![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Pharmacology (J.B., R.K.S., R.R.N.) and Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine (R.R.N.), the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. The N termini of some RGS4-family proteins provide receptor specificity and also contain an N-end rule determinant that results in ubiquitylation and decreased protein expression. The relevance of these mechanisms to other RGS proteins is not fully understood. Thus we examined function, receptor specificity, and expression of R4 subfamily RGS proteins (RGS2, -3, -4, -5, and -8). Although the N terminus plays a key role in protein stability in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, we were unable to demonstrate specificity of RGS2, -3, -4, -5, or -8 for muscarinic receptors (M1, M3, and M5). However, cellular RGS activity (8 = 3 > 2) was strongly correlated with expression; RGS4 and -5 had minimal expression and activity. Stabilizing mutations of RGS4 and -5 (C2S) enhanced expression and function with a greater influence on RGS4 than on RGS5. We were surprised to find that a predicted destabilizing mutation in RGS8 (A2C) did not markedly affect expression and had no effect on function. In contrast, a destabilizing mutation in RGS2 (RGS2-Q2L) recently identified as a rare N-terminal genetic variant in a Japanese hypertensive cohort (J Hypertens 23:1497–1505, 2005) showed significantly reduced expression and inhibition of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates. We were surprised to find that RGS2-Q2R, also predicted to be destabilizing, showed nearly normal expression and function. Thus, proteasomal regulation of RGS expression in HEK293 cells strongly controls RGS function and a novel RGS2 mutation with decreased protein expression could be relevant to the pathophysiology of hypertension in humans.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Richard R. Neubig, Department of Pharmacology, 1301 MSRB III/Box 0632, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0632. E-mail: rneubig{at}umich.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. H. Nisancioglu, W. M. Mahoney Jr., D. D. Kimmel, S. M. Schwartz, C. Betsholtz, and G. Genove Generation and Characterization of rgs5 Mutant Mice Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2008; 28(7): 2324 - 2331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gu, S. Tirgari, and S. P. Heximer The RGS2 Gene Product from a Candidate Hypertension Allele Shows Decreased Plasma Membrane Association and Inhibition of Gq Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2008; 73(4): 1037 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gu, A. Anton, S. Salim, K. J. Blumer, C. W. Dessauer, and S. P. Heximer Alternative Translation Initiation of Human Regulators of G-Protein Signaling-2 Yields a Set of Functionally Distinct Proteins Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Osei-Owusu, X. Sun, R. M. Drenan, T. H. Steinberg, and K. J. Blumer Regulation of RGS2 and Second Messenger Signaling in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells by cGMP-dependent Protein Kinase J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2007; 282(43): 31656 - 31665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Fu, X. Huang, L. Piao, A. N. Lopatin, and R. R. Neubig Endogenous RGS proteins modulate SA and AV nodal functions in isolated heart: implications for sick sinus syndrome and AV block Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2532 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
