QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.106.031732v1 71/5/1360    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by St. Aubin, C. N. Articles by Linsdell, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by St. Aubin, C. N. Articles by Linsdell, P.

Identification of a Second Blocker Binding Site at the Cytoplasmic Mouth of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Chloride Channel Pore

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Chloride transport by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl^– channel is inhibited by a broad range of substances that bind within a wide inner vestibule in the pore and physically occlude Cl^– permeation. Binding of many of these so-called open-channel blockers involves electrostatic interactions with a positively charged lysine residue (Lys95) located in the pore. Here, we use site-directed mutagenesis to identify a second blocker binding site located at the cytoplasmic mouth of the pore. Mutagenesis of a positively charged arginine at the cytoplasmic mouth of the pore, Arg303, leads to significant weakening of the blocking effects of suramin, a large negatively charged organic molecule. Apparent suramin affinity is correlated with the side chain charge at this position, consistent with an electrostatic interaction. In contrast, block by suramin is unaffected by mutagenesis of Lys95, suggesting that it does not approach close to this important pore-forming lysine residue. We propose that the CFTR pore inner vestibule contains two distinct blocker binding sites. Relatively small organic anions enter deeply into the pore to interact with Lys95, causing an open-channel block that is sensitive to both the membrane potential and the extracellular Cl^– concentration. Larger anionic molecules can become lodged in the cytoplasmic mouth of the pore where they interact with Arg303, causing a distinct type of open-channel block that is insensitive to membrane potential or extracellular Cl^– ions. The pore may narrow significantly between the locations of these two blocker binding sites.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Paul Linsdell, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, 5850 College Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1X5, Canada. E-mail: paul.linsdell{at}dal.ca