MolPharm Over 1500 Individual Drug Articles!

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on January 17, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.043042


0026-895X/08/7304-1092-1104$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 73:1092-1104, 2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.107.043042v1
73/4/1092    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riek, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, R. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riek, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, R. M.

Wide Turn Diversity in Protein Transmembrane Helices Implications for G-Protein-Coupled Receptor and Other Polytopic Membrane Protein Structure and FunctionFormula

R. Peter Riek, Angela A. Finch, Gillian E. Begg, and Robert M. Graham

Computational and Structural Biology Division (R.P.R.) and Molecular Cardiology (A.A.F., G.B., R.M.G.) Divisions, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia; and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia (A.A.F.)

Previously, we showed that perturbations of protein transmembrane helices are manifested as one of three types of noncanonical structures (wide turns, tight turns, and kinks), which, compared with {alpha}-helices, are evident by distinctive C{alpha}i->C{alpha}x distances. In this study, we report the analysis of more than 3000 transmembrane helices in 244 crystal structures from which we identified 70 wide turns (29 proline- and 41 nonproline-induced). Based on differences in the C{alpha}i->C{alpha}i-4 and C{alpha}i->C{alpha}i-5 profiles, we show that wide turns can be subclassified into three distinct subclasses (W1, W2, and W3) that differ with regard to the number and position of backbone i -> i-5 H-bonds formed N-terminal to the perturbing or signature proline or nonproline residue. Although wide turns generally produce changes in helical direction of 20° to 30° and a lateral shift in the helical axis, some of the W3 subclass are associated with changes of <5°. We also show that the distinct architectural features of wide turns allow the carbonyl bond of the i-4th residue, which is located on the widened loop of a wide turn, to be directed away from the helical axis. This provides regions of flexibility within helical regions allowing, for example, unique opportunities for interhelical H-bonding, including interactions with glycine zipper motifs, and for ion and cofactor binding. Furthermore, differences in wide-turn subtype usage by related protein family members, such as the G-protein-coupled receptors rhodopsin and the β2-adrenergic receptor, can significantly affect the orientation and position of residues critical for ligand binding and receptor activation.


Received October 30, 2007; accepted January 17, 2008

Address correspondence to: Dr. Robert M. Graham, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia. E-mail: b.graham{at}victorchang.edu.au







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics