QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: mol.108.047142v1 74/4/1059    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Qi, T. Articles by Hay, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Qi, T. Articles by Hay, D. L.

Identification of N-Terminal Receptor Activity-Modifying Protein Residues Important for Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide, Adrenomedullin, and Amylin Receptor Function

School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (T.Q., R.J.B., D.L.H.); and Drug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia (G.C., A.C., P.M.S.)

Calcitonin-family receptors comprise calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) or calcitonin receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) pairings. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors are CL/RAMP1, whereas adrenomedullin (AM) receptors are CL/RAMP2 (AM₁ receptor) or CL/RAMP3 (AM₂ receptor). Amylin (Amy) receptors are RAMP hetero-oligomers with the calcitonin receptor (AMY₁, AMY₂, and AMY₃, respectively). How RAMPs change G protein-coupled receptor pharmacology is not fully understood. We exploited sequence differences between RAMP1 and RAMP3 to identify individual residues capable of altering receptor pharmacology. Alignment of human RAMPs revealed eight residues that are conserved in RAMP2 and RAMP3 but are different in RAMP1. We hypothesized that residues in RAMP2 and RAMP3, but not RAMP1, are responsible for making CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we introduced individual RAMP3 residues into RAMP1 and vice versa in these eight positions. Mutant or wild-type RAMPs were transfected into Cos7 cells with CL or the insert-negative form of the calcitonin receptor [CT_(a)]. Agonist-stimulated cAMP production and cell-surface expression of constructs were measured. Position 74 in RAMP1 and RAMP3 was critical for determining AM potency and affinity, and Phe93 in RAMP1 was an important contributor to CGRP potency at CGRP receptors. Mutant RAMP/CT_(a) receptor complexes displayed different phenotypes. It is noteworthy that RAMP1 S103N and W74E mutations led to enhanced rAmy potency, probably related to increased cell-surface expression of these complexes. This differs from the effect on CL-based receptors where expression was unchanged. Targeted substitution has emphasized the importance of position 74 in RAMP1/RAMP3 as a key determinant of AM pharmacology.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Debbie L. Hay, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: dl.hay{at}auckland.ac.nz