MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on July 3, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.048710

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.


Received for publication May 8, 2008.
Revised June 24, 2008.
Accepted for publication July 2, 2008.

Structural determinants for antagonist pharmacology that distinguishes the {rho}1 GABAC receptor from GABAA receptors

Jianliang Zhang 1, Fenqin Xue 1, Yongchang Chang 1*

1 Barrow Neurological Institute/St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: yongchang.chang{at}chw.edu

Abstract

{gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor types C (GABACR) and A (GABAAR) are both GABA-gated chloride channels that are distinguished by their distinct competitive antagonist properties. The structural mechanism underlying these distinct properties is not well understood. In this study, using previously identified binding residues as a guide, we made individual or combined mutations of 9 binding residues in the {rho}1 GABACR subunit to their counterparts in the {alpha}1{beta}2{gamma}2 GABAAR or reverse mutations in {alpha}1 or {beta}2 subunits. The mutants were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and tested for sensitivities of GABA-induced currents to the GABAA and GABAC receptor antagonists. The results revealed that bicuculline insensitivity of the {rho}1 GABACR was mainly determined by Y106, F138 and F240 residues. Gabazine insensitivity of the {rho}1 GABACR was highly dependent on Y102, Y106, and F138. The sensitivity of the {rho}1 GABACR to 3-APA and its analogue 3-APMPA mainly depended on residues Y102, V140, FYS240-242, and F138. Thus, the residues of Y102, Y106, F138, and F240 in the {rho}1 GABACR are major determinants for its antagonist properties distinct from those in the GABAAR. In addition, V140 in the GABACR also contributes to the 3-APA binding. In conclusion, we have identified the key structural elements underlying distinct antagonist properties for the GABACR. The mechanistic insights were further extended and discussed in the context of antagonists docking to the homology models of GABAA or GABAC receptors.


Key words: GABAA, GABAC, Func. analysis receptor/ion channel mutants, Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics