Institute of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical
School, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy (R.M., A.O., S.R.G.,
C.E.), and
Division of Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical Sciences
and Biotechnology, University of Brescia, 25124 Brescia, Italy (M.G.)
 |
Introduction |
NPY is the most abundant and widely distributed
neuropeptide within the central nervous system, where it participates
in the control of a large number of physiological functions, including effects on food intake, psychomotor activity, and central endocrine secretion and potent vasoactive effects on the cardiovascular system
(1, 2). Two major subtypes of NPY receptors, Y1 and Y2, have been defined on the basis of pharmacological
criteria; the Y1 receptor is considered to be a
postjunctional receptor, and the Y2 receptor is considered
to be a prejunctional receptor (3). We and others previously reported
the molecular cloning of the Y1 receptor cDNA from rat (4,
5), mouse (6), and human (7, 8) tissues; its primary structure shows
that it belongs to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. In peripheral tissues, the Y1 receptor is found predominantly
at the sympathetic postjunctional sites in blood vessels, where it mediates the contractile response to NPY of vascular smooth muscle, both directly and indirectly by potentiating the action of other pressure agents, such as norepinephrine (3). In the central nervous
system, the Y1 receptor has been linked with different physiological processes, including stimulation of feeding behavior (9),
stimulation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release (9), a
sedative anxiolytic effect (10, 11), and modulation of inflammation and
nociception (12, 13).
Recent studies have shown that a marked plasticity in the expression of
the Y1 receptor and its mRNA can be induced under different
circumstances. For example, peripheral tissue inflammation evokes
up-regulation of Y1 receptor mRNA in dorsal root ganglia; in the same tissue, peripheral axotomy changes expression of the Y1 receptor mRNA level (12, 13). The molecular mechanisms responsible for regulation of Y1 receptor expression are
unknown; however, like the mechanisms for
2 receptors
and other G protein-coupled receptor genes (14-16), they may result
from alteration of the transcriptional regulatory pathway.
We recently cloned the murine gene of the Y1 receptor, and
we isolated a 1.3-kb genomic fragment of the 5
flanking region that is
able to drive the expression of the lacZ reporter gene in
the mouse neuroblastoma/rat glioma NG108-15 cell line and in rat
corticostriatal neuron primary cultures but not in the Y1 receptor-deficient rat glial and human embryonic kidney 293 cells (6).
Sequence analysis of this region revealed the presence of several
potential recognition sequences for known transcription factors,
including two decameric sequences corresponding to consensus sites for
members of the NF-
B/Rel family of transcription factors, three AP-1
sites, three half-palindromic estrogen-responsive elements, and one
cAMP-responsive element (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Murine Y1R-LUC expression plasmids. A,
Putative cis-acting elements residing in the upstream
region of the murine Y1 receptor gene. Above each
box, relative position of the proximal nucleotide in each motif
in relation to the initiator ATG. Below each box, nucleotide sequences. ERE, estrogen-responsive element;
CRE, cAMP-responsive element. Underlined,
sequences in the Y1- B motif corresponding to the B
site. B, Luciferase fusion constructs containing deletion fragments of
the murine Y1 receptor 5 flanking region.
Top, restriction fragments that were used for deletion
mutants.
|
|
In the current study, we further characterized the upstream promoter
region of the murine Y1 receptor gene through the use of
transient transfection assays with NG108-15 and 293 cells. Analysis of
Y1-R/LUC constructs containing deletions of the
Y1 receptor regulatory region suggested the presence of a
181-bp cell type-specific core promoter spanning nucleotides
399
through
218 from the initiator ATG and, upstream of this region, of
two positive and two negative regulatory elements. Furthermore, we present evidence that members of the NF-
B/Rel family of
transcription factors may participate in regulation of the
Y1 receptor gene expression. The functional role of this
family of inducible, ubiquitous transcription factors has been widely
characterized in the periphery, where these proteins respond to a
variety of signals and control expression of several genes mainly
implicated in inflammatory and immune reactions (for reviews, see Refs.
17-19). More recently, several groups have shown that NF-
B is also
abundant in brain, where it was found as both an inducible and a
constitutively activated form (20-27). However, currently, very little
is known about the role of NF-
B-related factors in regulation of the
expression of genes whose products play a functional role in the
central nervous system.
 |
Materials and Methods |
Cell culture.
The mouse neuroblastoma/rat glioma NG108-15
cells were plated onto Falcon Petri dishes coated with 10 µg/ml
poly-L-lysine (Mr
70-150 × 103) and were cultured in the minimum
essential medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1× HAT
supplement (all from GIBCO, Grand Island, NY). The human embryonic
kidney 293 cells were grown in minimum essential medium and 10% fetal
bovine serum. Mouse fibroblast NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% calf serum
(GIBCO). All culture media contained 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Plasmid construction.
A SalI/BglII
fragment from the original murine Y1 receptor genomic clone
(from nucleotides
1523 to
218 relative to the initiator ATG) was
first subcloned into the polylinker of pBluescript SK
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) (6) (Fig. 1B). The
SalI/BglII fragment was isolated by gel
electrophoresis; then, the BglII-digested end (all
restriction enzymes were from Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) was filled in with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (Boehringer-Mannheim) and excess of dNTPs (0.4 mM). The resulting SalI-blunt fragment was
ligated into the SalI/ClaI sites of pBluescript
SK
after the ClaI site of the plasmid was
filled to obtain a blunt end. This construct (pBS-Y1PR)
contains 1305 bp of the 5
flanking region of the murine Y1
receptor gene and includes the first three sites of initiation of
transcription (6). The Y1R-LUC expression plasmids were
constructed through subcloning into the polylinker of pGL2-basic
(Promega, Madison, WI) with the following restriction fragments from
pBS-Y1PR: a 1305-bp SalI/HindIII
fragment (p1305-LUC), a 985-bp HpaI/HindIII
fragment (p985-LUC), a 686-bp SmaI/HindIII fragment (p686-LUC), a 618-bp NsiI/HindIII
fragment (p618-LUC), a 490-bp SspI/HindIII
fragment (p490-LUC), a 306-bp PstI/HindIII fragment (p306-LUC), and a 181-bp EcoRI/HindIII
(p181-LUC) fragment (see Figs. 1B and 2B). Constructs
containing an upstream sequence between nucleotides
1113 and
960
(p895-LUC, p876-LUC, p808-LUC, and p742-LUC; see Figs. 1B and 2B) were
obtained through digestion of pBS-Y1PR with HpaI
and subsequent treatment with Bal31 enzyme (Boehringer-Mannheim). The
plasmid DNA was then rendered blunt with the Klenow enzyme, digested a
second time with HindIII, and subcloned into the
SmaI/HindIII sites of pGL2-basic. The junctions between the insert DNAs and luciferase gene of the fusion constructs were confirmed through sequence analysis (28).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
B-Y1R-LUC expression plasmids. A,
Putative regulatory elements residing in the 5 flanking region of the
Y1 receptor gene. B, B-Y1R-LUC fusion genes
containing the Y1- B motif ligated immediately upstream
of different deletion fragments of the murine Y1 receptor
promoter. Above each
B-Y1R-LUC
plasmid, corresponding luciferase fusion constructs containing
the deletion fragments of the murine Y1 receptor 5
flanking region. Mutant constructs were obtained as described in
Materials and Methods and were confirmed by sequence analysis and
restriction mapping. Restriction fragments that were used for deletion
mutants are shown in Fig. 1.
|
|
Oligonucleotides containing the Y1-
B and
mY1-
B (see below) were synthesized with BglII
overhangs, annealed, and inserted into the BamHI site of
pBluescript SK
, resulting in
B-pBS SK
and m
B-pBS SK
.
To construct p
B-985-LUC, p
B-686-LUC, pm
B-686-LUC, and
p
B-181-LUC plasmids, the deletion fragments of the Y1
receptor 5
flanking sequence were obtained from pBS-Y1PR
using the unique HindIII site from the pBluescript
SK
polylinker and the appropriate restriction sites in
the upstream region of Y1 receptor gene and were ligated
immediately downstream of the wild-type and mutated
B sites of
B-pBS SK
and m
B-pBS SK
. The resulting
plasmids were digested by XbaI, rendered blunt by Klenow
enzyme, digested a second time with HindIII, and subcloned into the SmaI/HindIII sites of the pGL2-basic
vector (see Fig. 2B). To obtain the p
B-893-LUC, p
B-873-LUC,
p
B-811-LUC, and p
B-741-LUC plasmids, the p
B-686-LUC plasmid
was digested by SmaI/HindIII to remove the 696-bp
insert, resulting in
B-pGL2. The plasmid pBS-Y1PR was
then digested with HpaI and subsequently treated with Bal31
enzyme. The plasmid DNA was rendered blunt by Klenow enzyme, digested a
second time with HindIII, and ligated into the
SmaI/HindIII sites of
B-pGL2 (see Fig. 2B).
The sequences of the resulting
B/Y1R-LUC expression
plasmids were confirmed through restriction analysis and nucleotide
sequence determination.
Sequencing of the Y1R-LUC expression plasmids revealed
seven nucleotide errors compared with the previously published 5
flanking region of the Y1 receptor
gene.1
Transient transfection experiments.
Transfection of reporter
plasmids into NG108-15, 293 and NIH 3T3 cells was performed according
to the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method (29). In all
experiments, pSV-
-galactosidase control vector (Promega), containing
the
-galactosidase gene linked to the simian virus 40 early
promoter/enhancer, was included as an internal control for the
different transfection efficiencies between experiments. When cells
reached ~50% confluence, each 35-mm Petri dish received equimolar
amounts (2.5 µg) of test plasmid and pSV-
-galactosidase. Cells
were harvested 48 hr after transfection, and the activities of
luciferase and
-galactosidase were assayed as previously described (30). As controls, the plasmid pGL2-basic, containing the promoterless luciferase gene, and the plasmid pGL2-promoter vector (Promega), containing the luciferase gene driven by the simian virus 40 promoter, were transfected into parallel cultures of each cell line. In all of
the cell lines tested, the pGL2-basic was inactive, whereas the
pGL2-promoter vector showed high levels of luciferase activity.
Pharmacological treatments of transiently transfected NG108-15 cells
were performed 8 and 20 hr before processing of cells.
Nuclear extracts and electrophoretic mobility shift assays.
Nuclear extracts from rat brain areas were prepared essentially as
described by Kang et al. (31). Nuclear extracts from cell
lines and from A.E7 cells were prepared according to a small-scale protocol (25) with minor modifications. Briefly, 5-10 × 106 cells were scraped into cold phosphate-buffered saline,
washed once in phosphate-buffered saline, and pelleted for 10 sec in an
Eppendorff centrifuge. Cells were then resuspended in 400 µl of cold
buffer A (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), allowed to swell on ice
for 10 min, and vortexed for 10 sec. Samples were centrifuged for 10 sec, and the pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of cold buffer C (20 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 420 mM
NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA,
0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and incubated on ice for 20 min for high salt extraction. Cellular debris were removed by centrifugation for 2 min at 4°, and
the supernatant was stored at
70°. Protein concentration was
assessed by BioRad (Hercules, CA) Bradford assay according to the
manufacturer's instructions. DNA binding reaction were initiated by
the combination of 2 µg of nuclear extracts with 20,000 cpm (0.1 ng)
of
-32P-labeled oligonucleotide probes in 1× lipage
buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol) containing 0.5 µg of poly(dI/dC) in a total volume of 10 µl. In competition experiments, indicated amounts of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides were added with 32P-labeled probes. Reactions were carried
out for 20 min at room temperature, and protein/DNA complexes were
resolved on nondenaturing 4% polyacrylamide gels in 1×
Tris/glycine/EDTA buffer (1× = 50 mM Tris, 380 mM glycine, and 2.7 mM EDTA). Gels were then
dried and subjected to autoradiography at room temperature.
Synthetic DNA oligonucleotides.
Oligonucleotide sequences
and their respective complementary strands were synthesized with a DNA
synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT) and purified through
denaturing gel electrophoresis. Oligonucleotides were annealed to
complementary strands by heating to 68° and cooling slowly to room
temperature. For gel shift analysis, double-stranded oligonucleotides
were end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP (> 7000 Ci/mmol; ICN
Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa) and T4 polynucleotide kinase
(Boehringer-Mannheim) to obtain a specific activity of
>108 cpm/µg. The sequences of the oligonucleotides were
as follows: Y1-
B,
5
-GATCATGGGATTTCATTGGGATTTCACTT-3
(sense);
mY1-
B,
5
-GATCCATctcATTTCATTctcATTTCACTT-3
(sense);
Ig-
B, 5
-CAGAGGGGACTTTCCGAGAGGC-3
; and octamer (octamer binding site from the IL-2 gene enhancer region),
5
-TATGTGTAATATGTAAAACATTTTGACACC-3
. Sequences corresponding to the
B site are underlined.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by
using the Mann-Whitney U test.
 |
Results |
Analysis of the effect of progressive deletion within the
Y1 receptor promoter on heterologous gene
expression.
The ability of several deletion mutants of the 5
flanking region of the murine Y1 receptor gene to
drive the expression of the luciferase reporter gene was analyzed in
transient transfection experiments. As shown in Fig. 3,
the 1.3-kb genomic fragment, spanning nucleotides
1523 through
218
relative to the initiator ATG (p1305-LUC), drives the luciferase
activity in NG108-15 cells, whereas a very low enzyme activity was
determined in 293 cells. Sequential deletion from nucleotides
1523
through
1026 (p985-LUC, p895-LUC, p876-LUC, and p808-LUC) had no
significant effect on luciferase activity (Figs. 3 and
4). Further deletion to nucleotide
960 (p742-LUC)
resulted in an ~2-fold increase in luciferase activity in NG108-15
cells but not in 293 cells, suggesting the presence of a negative
regulatory element between nucleotides
1026 and
960 that is
operative in NG108-15 cells. The promoter activity remained unchanged
by removal of the region between
960 and
904 (p686-LUC), whereas
further reduction of the upstream sequence to nucleotide
836
(p618-LUC) increased the luciferase activity by ~2-fold in NG108-15
cells but not in 293 cells, suggesting that the sequence between
nucleotides
904 and
836 contains a negative regulatory element that
contributes to lower Y1 receptor gene expression in this
cell type (Fig. 3). Further deletion to nucleotide
708 (p490-LUC)
decreased the luciferase activity to the level driven by the undeleted
Y1 receptor promoter (p1305-LUC) in NG108-15 cells,
suggesting the presence of a positive cis-acting element
between nucleotides
836 and
708. Extension of 5
deletion to
nucleotide
524 (p306-LUC) did not affect the luciferase activity significantly, whereas further deletion to nucleotide
399 (p181-LUC) reduced the reporter gene expression by 2.8-fold in NG108-15 cells, suggesting the presence of a positive cis-acting element
between nucleotides
524 and
399. The remaining 181 bp-genomic
fragment, spanning nucleotides
399 and
218 of the Y1
receptor gene, drives the luciferase activity in NG108-15 cells at a
level significantly above the pGL2-basic (see legend to Fig. 3),
indicating that it represents the minimal promoter region still capable
of directing expression of the Y1 receptor gene in the
neuroblastoma/glioma cell line. It should also be pointed out that the
same sequence is unable to drive luciferase activity in 293 cells.
Furthermore, all of the Y1 receptor deletion mutants/fusion
constructs drove negligible luciferase activity when transiently
transfected into the mouse fibroblast NIH 3T3 cell line (data not
shown).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Deletion analysis of the murine Y1
receptor gene promoter. The promoter activity of the
Y1R-LUC expression plasmids was determined in (open
bars) NG108-15 and (hatched bars) 293 cells.
Left, tested reporter plasmids. The luciferase activity
was normalized to -galactosidase activity obtained by cotransfecting
cells with the control plasmid pSV- -galactosidase (in cpm). Values
are mean ± standard error from eight or more transfection
experiments, each performed in triplicate, with plasmid DNAs from at
least two different preparations. Cultures transfected with the
promoterless plasmid pGL2-basic had a mean luciferase activity of
0.16 ± 0.018 and 0.04 ± 0.003 cpm × 10 6
in NG108-15 and 293 cells, respectively.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Enhancer activity of the Y1- B
sequence in NG108-15 cells. Histograms show the mean ± standard
error of at least eight transfection experiments, each performed in
triplicate. Each reporter plasmid tested (left) was
independently prepared at least two times. The luciferase activity was
normalized to -galactosidase activity from a cotransfected internal
control plasmid pSV- -galactosidase (in cpm). The luciferase activity
of p B-741-LUC, p B-686-LUC, and p B-181-LUC was significantly
more than that of p742-LUC, p686-LUC, and p181-LUC, respectively (*,
p < 0.05).
|
|
Binding of Y1-
B sequences to members of
the family of NF-
B transcription factors.
Detailed sequence
analysis of the Y1 receptor promoter region reveals
the presence of putative binding sites for known transactivating factors that may play a role in the regulation of the tissue-specific expression of this gene (Fig. 1A). Particularly, we focused our interest on the sequence located in position
1302 through
1282 in
the Y1 receptor gene regulatory region because it contains two decameric sequences corresponding to consensus sites for members of
the NF-
B/Rel family of transcription factors (6). We performed experiments to verify whether the aforementioned sequences are indeed
binding sites for transcriptional control proteins belonging to this
family. A well-studied model of gene regulation mediated by
B/Rel
proteins is represented by A.E7 cells, a CD4+ murine T cell
clone in which
B-mediated gene expression has been extensively
analyzed. Kang et al. (31) demonstrated that these
untransformed cells constitutively express at least two nuclear
complexes belonging to the NF-
B/Rel family: the p50-p65 (relA)
heterodimer and the p50 homodimer. In this well-characterized model, we
initially studied binding properties of the putative
B sequences
from the Y1 receptor gene.
An oligonucleotide comprising the two
B sequences from the
Y1 receptor gene (Y1-
B oligonucleotide) was
synthesized, radioactively labeled at the 5
end with T4 kinase, and
incubated with nuclear extracts prepared from A.E7 cells. Subsequently,
binding reactions were analyzed in a gel shift assay; results are shown
in Fig. 5A. The Y1-
B probe could detect
three nuclear complexes with different migration properties. All
complexes proved to result from specific interaction with the DNA
sequence because they were displaced, in a dose-dependent manner, by
the unlabeled oligonucleotide Y1-
B. To further analyze
the relationship between these nuclear complexes and NF-
B/Rel
proteins, an oligonucleotide sequence containing a classic
B site
(Ig-
B) was tested for the ability to compete for binding to the
Y1-
B oligonucleotide. As shown in Fig. 5A, only the top
two migrating complexes were competed, whereas the binding of the third
complex was unaffected. These results suggested that the two
higher-molecular-weight complexes able to bind the Y1-
B
sequence were indeed
B-related proteins, whereas the third complex,
which was present in nuclear extracts from A.E7 cells, was also able to
specifically bind the examined sequence, but as shown by the results of
the competition analysis with the Ig-
B oligonucleotide, we could
exclude that it was a
B-related protein or even a degradation
product of the higher-molecular-weight
B complexes. To further prove
the ability of the Y1-
B sequence to bind
B-related
complexes, we confirmed that bacterially expressed, affinity purified
p50 protein, one of the members of the NF-
B/Rel family, was indeed
able to bind the Y1-
B probe in a gel shift assay (Fig.
5B).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of the binding properties of the
Y1- B sequence on nuclear extracts from a T cell clone
endowed with constitutive NF- B/Rel activities and on the p50
subunit. A, Oligonucleotide sequence comprising the two B sequences
from the Y1 receptor gene (Y1- B) binds three
specific nuclear complexes in extracts from a murine T cell clone,
A.E7. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay obtained through incubation
of 2 µg of A.E7 nuclear extracts with 32P-labeled
Y1- B probe in the absence (0 ng) or in the presence of
1, 16, or 32 ng of unlabeled Y1- B or Ig- B as
competitors. B, Affinity purified, bacterially produced p50 subunit of
the NF- B/Rel family can bind the Y1- B oligonucleotide
probe. bp50, bacterially purified p50.
|
|
Nuclear extracts were also prepared from NG108-15 cells and tested in a
gel shift assay for binding to the 32P-labeled
Y1-
B sequence. In analogy with what we observed in A.E7
extracts, three retarded complexes were detected (Fig.
6A, lane 1). When the same extracts were
incubated with the Ig-
B oligonucleotide probe, two complexes were
detected, comigrating with the top two complexes bound to the
Y1-
B probe (Fig. 6A, lane 2). A detailed
competition analysis of the Y1-
B bound complexes was
performed (Fig. 6B). Increasing amounts (1-8 ng) of unlabeled Y1-
B oligonucleotide (lanes 2-4) and Ig-
B
(lanes 5-7) were used. The two higher-molecular-weight
complexes were displaced by both competitors, whereas binding of the
third complex seemed to be affected by the Y1-
B but not
by the Ig-
B oligonucleotide. None of the complexes were competed by
an unrelated oligonucleotide containing the octamer protein binding
site (lanes 9-12), even when a higher concentration (16 ng)
of competitor was used (lane 12).

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Gel shift analysis of nuclear complexes
specifically interacting with the Y1- B probe in NG108-15
cell extracts. A, Comparison of the migration properties of complexes
intercepted by (lane 1) Y1- B and
(lane 2) Ig- B oligonucleotide probes in NG108-15 cell
extracts. B, Competition analysis of the complexes bound by the
Y1- B oligonucleotide probe. Competition was performed by
adding the indicated amounts (in ng) of the unlabeled oligonucleotide sequences Y1- B (lanes 2-4) or Ig- B
(lanes 5-7) or the unrelated oligonucleotide sequence
for octamer binding proteins (lanes 9-12). , No
competitor (lanes 1 and 8). Apparent discrepancies in
the migration properties of complexes in A and B are due to differences in gel running length in the two different sets of experiments.
|
|
Interaction between the Y1-
B sequences and DNA-binding
factors was further investigated in nuclear extracts from several rat
brain regions, including cortex, hippocampus, striatum, cerebellum, and
olfactory bulb. Results of a representative gel shift assay are shown
in Fig. 7. Surprisingly, in this situation, a single DNA
binding activity was detected, which seemed to be specific because it
could be competed by unlabeled Ig-
B sequence [Fig. 7, lane
6, shows competition on nuclear extracts from rat cortex, but the
same results were obtained with extracts from the other rat brain
regions (not shown)].

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The Y1- B oligonucleotide sequence
binds a single B-related complex in nuclear extracts from several
rat brain regions. Protein extracts were from hippocampus (lane
1, hipp.), striatum (lane 2),
cerebellum (lane 3, cereb.), cortex
(lanes 4 and 6), and olfactory bulb (lane
5, olf. bulb). Lane 6, binding
competition was performed with 16 ng of the unlabeled oligonucleotide
Ig- B and nuclear extracts from cortex.
|
|
The Y1-
B oligonucleotide sequence from
the Y1 receptor gene acts as enhancer element
in NG108-15 cells.
Although the deletion from nucleotides
1523
to
1203 (p985-LUC) in the Y1 receptor sequence did
not affect luciferase activity in our in vitro model (Fig.
4), based on the essential role of the NF-
B/Rel family of
transcription factors for the expression of several genes (for reviews,
see Refs. 17-19), we surmised that the Y1-
B sequence
may participate in the regulation of the transcriptional activity of
this gene. To test this possibility, we constructed a series of
expression plasmids (p
B-Y1R-LUC) in which an
oligonucleotide corresponding to the Y1-
B sequence was
placed immediately upstream of deletion fragments of the Y1
receptor 5
flanking region that did not contain the endogenous sites
(Fig. 2B). Results indicated that the
Y1-
B sequence, when placed upstream of nucleotides
959,
904, and
399 from the initiator ATG (p
B-741-LUC,
p
B-686-LUC, and p
B-181-LUC, respectively), enhances by >2-fold
the luciferase activity in NG108-15 cells (Fig. 4). Specificity of the
effect was demonstrated by the fact that mutation of selected
nucleotides within the motifs, which abolished binding activity in gel
shift assay (not shown), completely abolished enhancer activity (Fig. 8). Interestingly, the Y1-
B sequence
seemed to be functional in NG108-15 cells but not in 293 cells (Fig.
8). Furthermore, the Y1-
B motif failed to increase
luciferase activity when placed upstream of nucleotides
1203
(p
B-985-LUC),
1111 (p
B-893-LUC),
1091 (p
B-873-LUC), and
1029 (p
B-811-LUC) suggesting that the 70-bp sequence spanning
nucleotides
1029 and
959 of the Y1 receptor promoter
contains a negative regulatory element that inhibits Y1-
B enhancer activity in NG108-15 cells (Fig. 4). The
B-related factors were found as both inducible and constitutively
activated complexes in the central nervous system (20-27). The
B
nuclear activity interacting with the Y1 receptor gene is
constitutive. We verified whether specific extracellular signals might
further activate the enhancer activity of the Y1-
B
sequence. To investigate this possibility, we treated NG108-15 cells
transfected with p
B-686-LUC or p
B-181-LUC plasmids with various
agents that are known to modulate activity of these transcriptional
regulators in either peripheral or central nervous system-derived cells
(17, 22, 25-27). In particular, we tested cytokines, such as IL-1 (30 units/ml), IL-2 (2 nM), and tumor necrosis factor-
(100 ng/ml); lipopolysaccharide (25 µg/ml); concanavalin A (25 µg/ml);
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (0.1 µM);
hydrogen peroxide (50 and 100 µM), KCl (30 mM); and glutamate (100 µM). However, none of
these agents were able to further augment the transcriptional activity
of p
B-686-LUC or p
B-181-LUC expression plasmids (data not shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mutational analysis of the Y1- B
sequence. A three-nucleotide mutation was made in each B motif from
the Y1- B oligonucleotide sequence as described in
Materials and Methods. The pm B-686-LUC fusion plasmid was prepared
by ligating the mutated Y1- B motif (mY1- B) immediately upstream of the 686-bp
(SmaI/HindIII) deletion fragment of the
Y1 receptor promoter. Promoter activity of the p1305-LUC,
p686-LUC, p B-686-LUC, and pm B-686-LUC was determined in
(open bars) NG108-15 and (hatched bars)
293 cells. The enhancer activity of the mutated Y1- B
motif was depicted in NG108-15 cells. *, p < 0.05 versus p1305-LUC. **, p < 0.05 versus
p686-LUC.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The Y1 receptor subtype plays important roles in
mediating NPY-induced control of several functions, including
cardiovascular system activity, neuroendocrine secretion, food intake,
and nociception (1, 2). In situ hybridization studies have
shown that Y1 receptor mRNA is indeed highly expressed in
several regions of the rat forebrain, in the hypothalamus, and in
dorsal root ganglia (4, 13, 32, 33). We previously isolated the murine
gene encoding the Y1 receptor and demonstrated that the 5
flanking region of this gene contains a functional promoter that is
active in neuronal cells (primary cultured neurons and NG108-15 cells) but not in glial or 293 cells (6).
In the current study, we investigated which regions of the
Y1 receptor promoter contain potential negative or positive
cis-acting elements participating in the regulation of gene
expression. For this purpose, luciferase constructs comprising the
1.3-kb 5
flanking regions of the Y1 receptor or various 5
deletions of it were transfected into a cell line that expresses the
Y1 receptor endogenously, NG108-15 cells, and in the
Y1 receptor-deficient 293 cell line. Deletional analysis
has shown the presence of several potential areas of transcriptional
regulation. Our data suggest the presence of at least two positive
acting regulatory elements lying between nucleotides
836 and
708
and between nucleotides
524 and
399. Although the sequence of the
fragment contained between
836 and
708 has no clear homology to any
known regulatory element, it is noteworthy that an AP-1 binding site
resides between nucleotides
473 and
479. Further mutational and
deletional analysis will be required to define whether this site
functions as a cis-acting element. In preliminary
experiments, we were able to show that the Y1 receptor
promoter/luciferase reporter gene can be positively modulated by
treatment with phorbol esters but that deletion of the sequence
containing the AP-1 site (
473 to
479) fails to suppress this type
of responsiveness (data not shown).
A second type of regulation that may exist for the Y1
receptor gene expression involves silencer domains. Our work suggests the presence of at least two negative regulatory elements contained between nucleotides
1026 and
960 and between nucleotides
904 and
836. To assess the cell type specificity of these sequences, 293 and
NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with the corresponding luciferase
constructs. All deletion mutants were ineffective in modulating
transcription of the heterologous luciferase gene in these cell lines,
indicating that the negative regulatory elements of the Y1
receptor gene are not responsible for repression in these cell lines.
Reporter gene assay also suggested that the core promoter (
399 to
218) of the Y1 receptor gene exhibited substantial cell type specificity. Ball et al. (34) recently reported that
the human Y1 receptor gene is under the control of three
promoters that are activated in a tissue-specific manner. It is
noteworthy that the core promoter of the murine Y1 receptor
gene displays a high sequence homology with the corresponding region of
the human promoter directing the expression of the most abundant
Y1 receptor transcript.
Detailed analysis of the sequence of the murine Y1 receptor
5
flanking region reveals the presence of many putative binding sites
for known transcription factors (6) (Fig. 1A). We focused our attention
on the murine Y1 receptor promoter region that contains two
decameric sequences located in tandem in position
1302 to
1282 bp,
relative to the ATG. These sequences correspond to consensus sites for
members of the
B-Rel family of transcription factors (17). In the
current study, we showed that this sequence can indeed bind
B-related nuclear complexes in a specific manner and acts as an
enhancer element in transiently transfected NG108-15 cells.
NF-
B/Rel proteins are constitutive and inducible transcription
factors that are present in most cell types. Each
B complex corresponds to homodimers and heterodimers whose subunits belong to a
superfamily that comprises at least five DNA binding proteins: p50, p52
(p50B), p65 (RelA), c-rel, and RelB (17-19). The inducible form of
NF-
B contains an additional inhibitory subunit called I
B and can
be activated in response to stimuli that mostly represent pathogenic
conditions, including viruses, bacterial lipopolysaccharide, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidants. It was previously suggested that
only a limited number of lymphoid cells contain constitutively active
NF-
B-related factors (35, 36). More recent evidence, however,
indicates that in the central nervous system, members of the
B
family of transcription factors are constitutively active and are
present in the nucleus of cultured neurons as well as in neurons
in vivo (21, 24, 25).
Our data demonstrate that the Y1-
B sequence binds with
high affinity members of the
B/Rel family of transcription factors in nuclear extracts from rat brain areas, from the NG108-15 neuronal cell line, and from the murine T cell clone A.E7. Interestingly, different binding properties were observed in nuclear extracts from
different sources. In nuclear extracts from rat brain regions, a single
B-related complex was detected. In nuclear extracts prepared from
the cell line NG108-15, as well as in extracts from the murine T cell
clone A.E7, three complexes with different migration properties
interacted specifically with the Y1-
B sequence, but only
two of them seemed to be
B-related nuclear activities in competition
experiments. The molecular nature of the third complex, specifically
interacting with the Y1-
B sequence, remains to be elucidated. Furthermore, detailed mutation studies are necessary to
better define the binding requirements of each complex to the Y1-
B sequence containing the two
B sites. Also, it
will be interesting to clarify the significance of the differences in
binding activities in rat brain extracts compared with extracts from
NG108-15 cells and from the murine T cell clone A.E7. It is noteworthy
that the single complex identified by the Y1-
B
oligonucleotide probe in rat brain extract is reminiscent of the
binding specificity of a
B-binding site recently identified and
characterized in the regulatory region of the amyloid precursor
protein, which in rat brain extracts recognizes specific complexes that
are either identical or very similar to p50 homodimers (25).
In transient transfection assays, we also demonstrated that the
Y1-
B sequence behaves as an enhancer element when placed upstream of deletion fragments of the Y1 receptor
regulatory region. Surprisingly, the Y1-
B site does not
enhances the transcriptional activity of the fusion gene constructs
when placed
70 bases upstream of nucleotide
959 relative to the
initiator ATG. These results suggest that the 70-bp region lying
between
1029 and
959 bases of the 5
flanking region of the
Y1 receptor gene might contain a negative regulatory
element that is able to suppress the enhancer activity of
Y1-
B sequence in NG108-15 cells.
The NF-
B activity interacting with the Y1 receptor gene
promoter seems to be a constitutive activity, but it is well known that
these transcriptional activators can be present as both activated and
inducible forms in neurons (20, 22, 25-27). A wide variety of stimuli
can modulate NF-
B/Rel activities, depending on the cell type
(17-19). However, the treatment of NG108-15 cells with several agents,
including inflammatory cytokines, oxidants, bacterial lipopolysaccharide, and neurotransmitters, failed to stimulate the
transcriptional activity of the Y1-
B sequence. It is
possible that in NG108-15 cells, the intracellular signals that
activate NF-
B proteins are coupled to specific membrane receptors
that we were unable to identify, or that in this tumoral cell line, the
Y1-
B binding activity is maximally up-regulated. To
answer these questions, we are analyzing the modulation of the
Y1-
B binding activity in primary cultures of neuronal
cells.
The results that we report are, to our knowledge, the first
demonstration that a
B-related motif contained in the regulatory region of a neuropeptide receptor gene binds
B-related nuclear proteins and might be activated by this family of transcription factors. The functional significance of these data remains to be
elucidated. Kaltschmidt et al. (22) suggested that in
neurons, the
B-related factors might participate in the normal
physiology and development of the nervous system. Sequence analysis
revealed the presence of putative
B-related sequences in the
regulatory region of other neuropeptide receptor genes, such as the
vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor (37) and the
-opioid receptor
(38). It is possible that this family of transcription factors
participates in the control of neurotransmission by transcriptionally
regulating the expression of neuropeptide and neurotransmitter receptor
genes.
In most cell types, the
B-related proteins mediate an
immediate-early response to stimuli that represent stress conditions. Vascular responsiveness to NPY was shown to be increased in conditions that were occurring physiologically during prolonged stress or in
disease states, such as hypertension (39). In addition, NPY seems to
play a critical role in the transmission of stress-related information
to the hypothalamic/hypophysial system and in the activation of
neuroendocrine responses essential for the survival of the organism
(40). An interesting possibility is that the Y1 receptor
for NPY may represent one of the
B site-containing genes that is
modulated in the mammalian nervous system by
B-related factors in
response to stimuli that require an immediate defensive response.
We thank Prof. F. Altruda (Department of Biology, Genetics and
Medical Chemistry, University of Torino, Torino, Italy), Dr. D. Fornasari (CNR Center of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Milano,
Italy), and Dr. L. Varesio (Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Istituto
G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy) for critical reading of the manuscript.
| 1.
|
Heilig, M. and
E. Widerlöv.
Neuropeptide Y: an overview of centrally distribution, functional aspects, and possible involvement in neuropsychiatric illness.
Acta Psychiatr. Scand.
82:95-114 (1990)[Medline].
|
| 2.
| Allen, J. M., and J. I. Koenig. Central and peripheral
significance of neuropeptide Y and its related peptides. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 611: (1992).
|
| 3.
|
Wahlestedt, C. and
D. J. Reis.
Neuropeptide Y-related peptides and their receptors: are the receptors potential therapeutic drug targets?
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
32:309-352 (1993).
|
| 4.
|
Eva, C.,
K. Keinanen,
H. Monyer,
P. Seeburg, and
R. Sprengel.
Molecular cloning of a novel G protein-coupled receptor that may belong to the neuropeptide receptor family.
FEBS Lett.
271:81-84 (1990)[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Krause, J.,
C. Eva,
P. H. Seeburg, and
R. Sprengel.
Neuropeptide Y1 subtype pharmacology of a recombinantly expressed neuropeptide receptor.
Mol. Pharmacol.
41:817-821 (1992)[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Eva, C.,
A. Oberto,
R. Sprengel, and
E. Genazzani.
The murine NPY-1 receptor gene: structure and delineation of tissue specific expression.
FEBS Lett.
314:285-288 (1992)[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Herzog, H.,
Y. J. Hort,
H. J. Ball,
G. Hayes,
J. Shine, and
L. A. Selbie.
Cloned human neuropeptide Y receptor couples to two different second messenger systems.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5794-5798 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Larhammar, D.,
A. G. Blomqvist,
F. Yee,
E. Jazin,
H. Yoo, and
C. Wahlestedt.
Cloning and functional expression of a human neuropeptide Y/peptide YY receptor of the Y1 type.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:10935-10938 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Kalra, S. P.,
A. Sahu,
P. S. Kalra, and
W. R. Crowley.
Hypothalamic neuropeptide Y: a circuit in the regulation of gonadotropin and feeding behavior.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
611:273-283 (1990)[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Heilig, M.,
B. Söderpalm,
J. A. Engel, and
E. Widerlöv.
Centrally administered neuropeptide Y (NPY) produces anxiolytic-like effects in animal anxiety models.
Psychopharmacology
98:524-529 (1989)[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Wahlestedt, C.,
E. Merlo Pich,
G. F. Koob,
F. Yee, and
M. Heilig.
Modulation of anxiety and neuropeptide Y-Y1 receptors by antisense oligonucleotides.
Science (Washington D. C.)
259:528-531 (1993)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ru-Rong, J.,
X. Zhang,
Z. Wiesenfeld-Hallin, and
T. Hökfelt.
Expression of neuropeptide Y and neuropeptide Y (Y1) receptor mRNA in rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia following peripheral tissue inflammation.
J. Neurosci.
14:6423-6434 (1994)[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Zhang, X.,
Z. Wiesenfeld-Hallin, and
T. Hökfelt.
Effect of peripheral axotomy on expression of neuropeptide Y1 receptor mRNA in rat lumbar dorsal root ganglia.
Eur. J. Neurosci.
6:43-57 (1994)[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Collins, S.,
J. Altschmied,
C. Herbsman,
M. G. Caron,
D. L. Mellon, and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
A cAMP response element in the 2-adrenergic receptor gene confers transcriptional autoregulation by cAMP.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:19330-19335 (1990)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hershey, A. D.,
P. E. Dykema, and
J. E. Krause.
Organization, structure, and expression of the gene encoding the rat substance P receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:4366-4374 (1991)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Zhou, Q.-Y.,
C. Li, and
O. Civelli.
Characterization of gene organization and promoter region of the rat dopamine D1 receptor gene.
J. Neurochem.
59:1875-1883 (1992)[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Grilli, M.,
J. J.-S. Chiu, and
M. J. Lenardo.
NF- B and Rel participants in a multiform transcriptional regulatory system.
Int. Rev. Cytol.
143:1-62 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Liou, H. C. and
D. Baltimore.
Regulation of the NF- B/rel transcription factor and I B inhibitor system.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5:477-487 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Bauerle, P. A. and
T. Henkel.
Function and activation of NF- B in the immune system.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12:141-179 (1994)[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kaltschmidt, C.,
B. Kaltschmidt, and
P. A. Bauerle.
Brain synapses contain inducible forms of the transcription factor NF- B.
Mech. Dev.
43:135-147 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kaltschmidt, C.,
B. Kaltschmidt,
H. Neumann,
H. Wekerle, and
P. A. Bauerle.
Constitutive NF- B activity in neurons.
Mol. Cell Biol.
14:3981-3991 (1994)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kaltschmidt, C.,
B. Kaltschmidt, and
P. A. Bauerle.
Stimulation of ionotropic glutamate receptors activates transcription factor NF- B in primary neurons.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:9618-9622 (1995)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Bakalkin, G. Y.,
T. Yakovleva, and
L. Terenius.
NF-kappa B-like factors in the murine brain: developmentally-regulated and tissue-specific expression.
Mol. Brain Res.
20:137-146 (1993).
[Medline] |
| 24.
|
Rattner, A.,
M. Korner,
M. D. Walker, and
Y. Citri.
NF- B activates the HIV promoter in neurons.
EMBO J.
12:4261-4267 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Grilli, M.,
M. Ribola,
A. Alberici,
A. Valerio,
M. Memo, and
P. F. Spano.
Identification and characterization of a NF- B/Rel binding site in the regulatory region of the amyloid precursor protein gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:26774-26777 (1995)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Grilli, M.,
F. Goffi,
M. Memo, and
P. F. Spano.
Interleukin-1 and glutamate activate the NF- B/Rel binding site from the regulatory region of the amyloid precursor protein gene in primary neuronal cultures.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:15002-15007 (1996)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Guerrini, L.,
F. Blasi, and
S. Denis-Donini.
Synaptic activation of NF- B by glutamate in cerebellar granule neurons in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:9077-9081 (1995)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and
A. R. Coulson.
DNA sequencing with chain-termination inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467 (1977)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Chen, C. and
H. Okayama.
High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7(8):2745-2752 (1987)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Glembotski, C. C.,
C. E. Ironns,
K. A. Krown,
S. F. Murray,
A. B. Sprenkle, and
C. A. Sei.
Myocardial -thrombin receptor activation induces hypertrophy and increases atrial natriuretic factor gene expression.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:20646-20652 (1993)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Kang, S.-M.,
A.-C. Tran,
M. Grilli, and
M. J. Lenardo.
NF- B subunit regulation in nontransformed CD4+ T lymphocytes.
Science (Washington D. C.)
256:1452-1456 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Mikkelsen, J. D. and
P. J. Larsen.
A high concentration of NPY (Y1)-receptor mRNA-expressing cells in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus.
Neurosci. Lett.
148:195-198 (1992)[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Larsen, P. J.,
S. P. Sheikh, and
J. D. Mikkelsen.
Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors in the rat forebrain: autoradiographic demonstration of [125I][Leu31,Pro34]-NPY binding sites and neurons expressing Y1 receptor mRNA.
J. Recept. Signal Transd. Res.
15:457-472 (1995)[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Ball, H. J.,
J. Shine, and
H. Herzog.
Multiple promoters regulate tissue-specific expression of the human NPY-Y1 receptor gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27272-27276 (1995)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Griffin, G. E.,
K. Leung,
T. M. Folks,
S. Kunkel, and
G. J. Nabel.
Activation of HIV gene expression during monocyte differentiation by induction of NF- B.
Nature (Lond.)
339:70-73 (1989)[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Schreck, P.,
P. Rieber, and
P. A. Bauerle.
Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of NF- B transcription factor and HIV-1.
EMBO J.
10:2247-2258 (1991)[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Sreedharan, S. P.,
J.-X. Huang,
M.-C. Cheung, and
E. J. Goetzl.
Structure, expression, and chromosomal localization of the type I human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2939-2943 (1995)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Augustin, L. B.,
R. F. Felsheim,
B. H. Min,
S. M. Fuchs,
J. A. Fuchs, and
H. H. Loh.
Genomic structure of the mouse opioid receptor gene.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
207:111-119 (1995)[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Zukowska-Grojec, Z. and
C. Wahlestedt.
Origin and actions of neuropeptide Y in the cardiovascular system, in The Biology of Neuropeptide Y and Related Peptides (M. F. Colmers and
C. Wahlestedt, eds.). Humana Press, Totowa, 315-388 (1993).
|
| 40.
|
McDonald, J. K. and
J. I. Koenig.
Neuropeptide Y actions on reproductive and endocrine functions, in The Biology of Neuropeptide Y and Related Peptides (W. F. Colmers and
C. Wahlestedt, eds.). Humana Press, Totowa, 419-456 (1993).
|