![]() |
|
|
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.S., M.S.S.) and Sealy Center for Molecular Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1062 (A.K., M.S.S.), Institute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia (Z.S.), and Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 (A.J.W.)
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We characterized a new iodinated, high affinity, linear V1a
vasopressin antagonist,
phenylacetylD-Tyr(Et)Phe-Gln-Asn-Lys-Pro-Arg-Tyr-NH2. The antagonist bound specifically to the V1a vasopressin
receptor in crude rat liver membranes with an apparent
Kd value of 0.168 nM. This affinity is ~1 order of magnitude greater
than that of the natural agonist, vasopressin. The inhibitory activity of the antagonist can be demonstrated by its inability to elicit activation and uncoupling of G proteins from the receptor. Thus, after
occupancy of receptor sites in rat liver membranes with labeled
antagonist and detergent solubilization, the labeled receptor (~60
kDa) was eluted as a stable 400-kDa complex on size-exclusion chromatography. In contrast, when the receptor sites were occupied by
the agonist [3H]vasopressin, the receptor eluted as a
60-kDa peak. Coincubation of membranes with iodinated antagonist and an
excess of unlabeled vasopressin caused both reduced antagonist binding
and a complete shift from the 400-kDa to the 60-kDa peak. The addition
of vasopressin to unliganded 400-kDa fractions resulted in a 75%
increase in [35S]guanosine-5
-O-(3-thio)triphosphate
binding activity, indicating that the 400-kDa fraction contains
complexes between the V1a receptor and G proteins. The
vasopressin-elicited increase was inhibited by antagonist. Using
specific antibodies and immunoadsorption to protein A/Sepharose
columns, we found that G protein isotypes G
q/11,
G
i3, and G
s, and effector enzymes
PLC-
1, PLC-
2 and PLA-2 were associated with the
antagonist-labeled receptor in the 400-kDa fraction. Because the
400-kDa complex was found in the absence of ligand, the V1a
receptor and the appropriate G proteins and effector enzymes are likely
preassociated with each other and do not aggregate after antagonist
addition. The association of V1a receptor with the
different specific G proteins and effector enzymes is consistent with
the multiple actions of vasopressin on liver cells. Antibodies directed
against a portion of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the
V1a receptor interacted with 60-kDa antagonist-occupied
receptor but not with receptor in the 400-kDa complex. These results
suggest that the carboxyl-terminal region of the receptor is sterically
hindered when coupled to G proteins. The iodinated linear vasopressin
antagonist therefore allows stable receptor/G protein complexes and can
be an important tool (along with the antisera) for use in the study of
factors that control V1a receptor/G protein coupling.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AVP
receptors are members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled
receptors. Distinct yet similar vasopressin receptor subtypes, which
are expressed by separate genes (1), are found in the liver
(V1a), anterior pituitary [V1b
(V3)], and kidney (V2). V1 receptors are associated with polyphosphoinositide metabolism; V2 receptor activity is mediated by cAMP. V1a
receptors in liver membranes have been solubilized and characterized
(2-6). Incubation of liver membranes with GTP
S reduces the affinity
of the receptor for ligand, presumably by dissociating a receptor/G
protein complex (5). A nearly homogeneous preparation of rat liver
V1a receptor has an apparent molecular weight of 58,000, which is in agreement with affinity cross-linking results with crude
membrane preparations (6).
A number of selective AVP agonists and antagonists have served as powerful tools to elucidate the physiological and pathophysiological roles of AVP (7, 8). Manning et al. (8) showed that acyclic analogues of AVP have potent antagonistic properties, and they synthesized eight variants with a Tyr-NH2 residue at the carboxyl terminus for radioiodination (9). One has been characterized in detail (10), whereas another, LVPA, is the subject of the current study. This peptide is of interest because it has an 8-Lys that can be derivatized for photoaffinity labeling or labeling with biotin or used with bifunctional cross-linking agents. One purpose of the current study was to characterize binding and functional properties of this peptide. We noted that unlike tritiated agonist, the iodinated antagonist allows V1a receptor to remain complexed to G proteins and effector enzymes during solubilization. As such, the iodinated antagonist takes on even greater usefulness by allowing the identification of the G proteins and to discriminate between coupled and uncoupled forms of the V1a receptor.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
[tyrosyl-2,6-3H]AVP
(17.4 Ci/mmol) and Na125I were purchased from Amersham
(Arlington Heights, IL). CHAPSO was purchased from Pierce Chemical
(Rockford, IL). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to mouse
G
q/11 (residues 341-359 of
G
q and G
11),
mouse G
q (residues 13-29), rat
G
s/olf (residues 377-394 of G
s,
differing from G
olf by a single residue),
rat G
i3 (residues 345-354), rat PLC-
1 (residues
1204-1216), human PLC-
2 (residues 1213-1232), human PLA-2
(residues 1-216), and corresponding peptides used for the antibodies
preparation were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz,
CA). Rabbit antiserum to murine G
q/14 was
directed against the peptide H2N-CQLNREFNLV-COOH, corresponding to residues 350-359 of the carboxyl terminus of G
14 (11). LVPA (9) was a gift from Dr.
Maurice Manning (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, OH). The other AVP analogues were
purchased from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA).
[35S]GTP
S (1156 Ci/mmol, was purchased from DuPont-New
England Nuclear Research Products (Boston, MA). Mastoparan was
purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
Iodination of linear AVP antagonist. LVPA was monoiodinated to a specific activity of ~2000 Ci/mmol, and the labeled peptide was purified by high performance liquid chromatography, as described previously for the preparation of iodinated oxytocin antagonist (12).
Binding studies. Binding parameters were determined by incubating liver membranes (50 µg) with increasing concentrations of 125I-LVPA (8-1100 pM) for 16 hr at 4° in a final volume of 150 µl. Assay buffer was composed of 50 mM Tris-maleate, 10 mM MnCl2, 0.1% (w/v) gelatin, 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Fraction V), and 0.05% (w/v) bacitracin, pH 7.5. Nonspecific binding was determined by the addition of 0.1 µMAVP for each 125I-LVPA concentration point. Bound and free ligands were separated by filtration through microporous glass-fiber filters (Whatman GF/C) presoaked in 0.3% (v/v) polyethyleneimide in water, with the use of a Titertek Cell Harvester 530 (Flow Laboratories, Irvine, Scotland). For competition experiments, 50-µg samples of liver membrane proteins were incubated with 0.43 pM 125I-LVPA (~20,000 cpm) and increasing concentrations of peptides. We determined membrane protein concentrations by using Micro BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce Chemical) and bovine serum albumin as standard.
Solubilization of occupied receptor.
Livers from adult
female Sprague-Dawley rats were homogenized in 10 volumes of buffer
composed of 10 mM Tris, 1.5 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.4, at
4°.3 The homogenate was centrifuged
20,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was
recentrifuged at 165,000 × g for 30 min at 4°. The
microsomal pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-maleate, pH 7.6, containing 10 mM MnCl2 and stored at
70° at concentrations ranging from 7 to 18 mg of membrane
protein/ml. Aliquots were thawed, repelleted at 165,000 × g for 30 min, adjusted to a concentration of 9 mg of
membrane protein in 2 ml of binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MnCl2, pH 7.6), and resuspended by
sonication. Labeled agonist or antagonist (~1 × 106
cpm) was incubated with the membranes for 1 hr at 22°. Unbound ligand
was removed by centrifuging the membranes at 165,000 × g for 30 min at 4°. The resulting pellets were homogenized
in 0.9 ml of solubilization solution composed of 7.5 mM
CHAPSO, 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaN3, 2 mM EDTA, and 20 mM ATP, pH 7.6, and incubated on ice for 30 min with constant stirring. The extract was centrifuged at 165,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was
adjusted to a final concentration of 5.0 mM CHAPSO by the
addition of 20 mM HEPES, and a mix of proteolysis
inhibitors to a final concentration of 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg of leupeptin/ml, and 10 µg of
apoprotinin/ml was added. The samples were either used immediately for
chromatography or stored at
70° for several days until used.
Size-exclusion chromatography. Columns for chromatography were equilibrated with DOC buffer (5 mM deoxycholate, 20 mM HEPES, and 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). Two types of columns were used: Sepharose 6L-CB (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) (1.5 × 100 cm) and Superose 12 HR 10/30 (Pharmacia). Solubilized extracts (0.5 ml) were applied to the columns, and 2- and 0.5-ml fractions, respectively, were collected. Radioactivity in each fraction was measured using a gamma counter, and in some instances specific fractions were pooled and used for further studies. Molecular size markers were purchased from Pharmacia.
Measurement of [35S]GTP
S
binding.
Aliquots of the 400-kDa peak eluted from Superose 12 HR
10/30 columns were adjusted to 3.5 µg of protein in 50 µl and
assayed for [35S]GTP
S binding by a modification
of the method of Hepler et al. (13). The final sample (100 µl) contained 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 3 mM EGTA,
20 mM MgCl2, 50 µM GDP, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% deoxycholic acid, 50 µM
GTP
S, and 3 nM [35S]GTP
S. Assays were
performed in the presence or absence of 0.1 µM AVP or 1 µM unlabeled LVPA. Mastoparan (50 µM) was
used as positive control. The samples were incubated for 20 min at
30°. Bound and free [35S]GTP
S was separated by gel
permeation through 1-ml Sephadex G-50 spin-columns (equilibrated with
20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, and 5 mM deoxycholate).
Radioactivity in the void volume fraction was quantified by liquid
scintillation counting.
Production of polyclonal antisera to the rat V1a receptor. Antisera were produced by Immuno-Dynamics (La Jolla, CA). The synthetic peptide H2N-CHSMAQKFAKDDSDS-COOH, which is a 15-mer peptide extending to 10 residues from the carboxyl-terminal tail of the rat V1a receptor (1), was coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin using the heterobifunctional reagent m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxy-succinimide ester. Two rabbits were hyperimmunized with the conjugate. The IgG fraction was purified from antisera using protein A/Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma) columns, as described previously (14), or antibodies were affinity purified by adsorption to peptide/bovine serum albumin complex coupled to Carbolink Gel according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce Chemical). The hapten was coupled to bovine serum albumin in the same manner as for hemocyanin.
Immunoadsorption of V1a receptor
complexes.
Aliquots (400 µl) of
125I-LVPA-labeled fractions obtained after size
selection on Superose 12 HR 10/30 column were incubated with
anti-G
and anti-phospholipase polyclonal antibodies at
4° for 4 hr. To verify antibody specificity, antibodies were preincubated for 90 min with the corresponding haptens (amounts as
described in figure legends) before addition of the 400-kDa fraction.
The concentration of each antibody was 10 µg in 100 µl of
phosphate-buffered saline, containing 0.2% gelatin and 1% bovine
serum albumin. After incubation, the samples were loaded onto protein
A/Sepharose CL-4B columns. Each column was composed of 150 µl of gel
in a 1-ml syringe, which was preequilibrated with 10% bovine serum
albumin at room temperature in DOC buffer and then rinsed with 2 ml of
DOC buffer. After application of the samples, the columns were rinsed
five times with 1 ml of DOC buffer, and adsorbed and unadsorbed
radioactivity was measured using a gamma counter.
Immunoaffinity column chromatography. A 2.5-ml aliquot of solubilized rat liver membrane proteins labeled with 125I-LVPA was applied to a 10-ml immunoaffinity column, which consisted of 20 mg of rabbit polyclonal V1a receptor antibodies (protein A purified from antiserum) immobilized to Carbolink Gel according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce Chemical). After incubation overnight at 4°, the gel was rinsed with DOC buffer to wash out unbound material, and proteins adsorbed to the column were eluted with 50 mM triethanolamine containing 5 mM DOC, pH 11.5. The columns were regenerated by rinsing with phosphate-buffered saline until pH was restored to 7.4, and the columns could be used several more times.
Immunoblotting. Fractions from columns were concentrated with a Centricon-10 concentrator (Amicon, Beverly, MA). Samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10% or 12.5% polyacrylamide). Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon P, Amersham) using a semidry blotter (Buchler Instruments). Nonspecific interactions were blocked with a 5% dry milk solution in phosphate-buffered saline/Tween 20 overnight at 4°. The membranes were incubated with antibody for 1 hr at room temperature, followed by a 1-hr incubation with horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit Ig antibody from donkey. The ECL system (Amersham) was used for detection.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Scatchard analyses showed that LVPA apparently bound
to a single class of noninteracting sites in crude rat liver membranes, with an apparent Kd value of
0.168 ± 0.004 nM and
Bmax value of 32.7 ± 4.2 fmol/mg of
protein (values are mean ± standard error; five determinations)
(Fig. 1, top). The ligand specificity of the
receptor sites was measured by the ability of AVP and several analogues to compete for binding with 125I-LVPA. The
regressions were parallel, indicating a common set of binding sites
(Fig. 1, bottom). The rank orders of affinities for the
peptides were
des-Gly-[phenylacetyl1,D-Tyr(O-ethyl)2,Lys6,Arg8]vasopressin > [(
-mercapto-
,
-cyclopentamethylene propionic acid)1,Tyr(-methyl)2,Arg8]vasopressin > [Arg8]vasopressin > oxytocin > [Thr4,Gly7]oxytocin > pressinoic acid.
The first two peptides, which are cyclic AVP antagonists (15), had
lower relative Ki values than AVP.
Oxytocin and the selective oxytocin agonist
[Thr4,Gly7]oxytocin had greater relative
Ki values than AVP. Pressinoic acid,
which contains the six-residue ring of AVP but lacks the three-residue
tail, bound with low affinity.
|
Comparison of the size of solubilized receptor binding to [3H]AVP versus iodinated antagonist by gel-exclusion chromatography on columns of Sepharose 6B CL showed that the complexed agonist eluted as a peak ~60 kDa, whereas the complexed antagonist eluted as a 400-kDa peak (Fig. 2A). The 60-kDa form apparently has a reduced affinity for the ligand because unbound [3H]AVP was eluted even though all of the ligand was bound before solubilization. The presence of the 400-kDa peak was largely absent in the lactating rat mammary gland, which has a preponderance of oxytocin receptors (16; data not shown). Incubation of liver membranes with iodinated antagonist (~0.2 nM) and 100 nM AVP resulted in reduced binding and a complete shift from the 400-kDa peak to the 60-kDa peak (Fig. 2B). These findings indicate that AVP destabilizes the 400-kDa complex while allowing reduced binding of 125I-LVPA to the 60-kDa receptor. The V1a receptor has a higher affinity for 125I-LVPA than AVP itself (Fig. 1B).
|
To determine whether the antagonist causes the receptor to associate
with other proteins or whether the antagonist binds to existing
high-molecular-weight receptor complexes, we carried out size selection
of the solubilized receptor in the absence of antagonist. Fractions
containing the receptor were identified by immunoblotting using
antisera directed against residues near the carboxyl terminus of the
rat V1a receptor. The specificity of affinity purified
antibodies for the rat V1a receptor was shown with
immunoblot analysis. The antibodies reacted with a ~60-kDa band from
rat liver membranes (Fig. 3), corresponding in size to
the purified receptor (5, 6). The specific receptor band was absent
from comparable amounts of membranes from rat kidney, which contain a
preponderance of vasopressin V2 receptors. No cross-reactivity was seen with human V1a receptors in human
amnion/chorion, as would be expected from the different amino acid
sequence (Fig. 3). Receptor immunoreactivity was found in the 400-kDa
fraction regardless of whether the binding site was occupied by
antagonist, suggesting that the 400-kDa receptor/protein complex is
preformed (Fig. 4B). In agreement with the radioactivity
profile of labeled antagonist (Fig. 4A), little receptor was present in
the 60-kDa form. Tentative identification of receptor-associated
proteins in the 400-kDa fraction was made by immunoblot analyses, using antisera to several G protein
subunits. Significant quantities of
G
q (Fig. 4C) and
G
i (Fig. 4D) classes were found in the
400-kDa and smaller fractions. G
s was also present in
the 400-kDa peak but absent in the fraction corresponding to free
Gs (Fig. 4E).
|
|
A direct demonstration of the association of V1a
vasopressin receptors with G proteins in the unliganded 400-kDa peak
was shown by AVP-induced [35S]GTP
S binding. The
addition of AVP to the 400-kDa fraction caused a 75% increase in
[35S]GTP
S binding (p < 0.05),
which was inhibited by the LVPA (Fig. 5). The antagonist
itself was ineffective in stimulating [35S]GTP
S
binding. Vasopressin-activated binding was ~60% that induced by
mastoparan, a peptide toxin from wasp venom that mimics receptors by
activating Gi and Go (17). In support of the
lack of effect of LVPA on [35S]GTP
S binding, the
addition of GTP
S (0.1 mM) or GTP (20 mM) to
125I-LVPA-bound rat liver membranes before solubilization
had no effect on the amount of 400-kDa complex formed (data not shown).
|
The identities of G proteins in the 125I-labeled receptor
complex were determined by isolation of the complex by size selection to eliminate unassociated G proteins, followed by the addition of
specific G protein
subunit antibodies and immunoadsorption to
protein A/Sepharose CL-4B. After extensive rinsing of each protein A
column, the amount of G protein-coupled labeled receptor was measured.
The addition of anti-G
q/11 or G
i3
antibodies each resulted in adsorption of >20% of the labeled complex
to protein A compared with 3% adsorption by preimmune, protein
A-purified IgG (Fig. 6, top). In contrast,
there was little or no effect of anti-G
14
and antibodies directed against the amino-terminal domain of
G
q.
|
Antibodies directed against G
s/olf also bound to labeled
complex, but the amount was consistently less than that seen with
anti-G
q/11 and G
i3. To determine whether
the notable binding of G
q/11 and G
i3 was
specific, the two were incubated separately with the peptide used for
immunization. The haptens competed with labeled binding sites in a
ligand-specific manner; each peptide was competitive only with its
corresponding antibody (Fig. 6, bottom).
Antagonist-labeled complexes were also examined for the presence of
possible effector enzymes by the use of antibodies to PLC-
1,
PLC-
2, and PLA-2. Approximately 11% of the complex was adsorbed by
either anti-PLC-
1 or -PLA-2 antibodies, whereas ~7% was adsorbed
with anti-PLC-
2 (Table 1). The specific binding of
the anti-PLC-
1 and anti-PLC-
2 antibodies was significantly reduced by preincubation with 10 µg of specific hapten (Table 1).
Because of the relatively large size of the PLA-2 peptide used for
immunization (216 residues), 10 µg of peptide was apparently too
small of a molar concentration to compete with PLA-2 for antibody binding sites.
|
When crude LVPA-liganded complex from solubilized membranes was adsorbed to immobilized antireceptor antibodies, approximately half of the radioactivity was bound to the column (Fig. 7, top). In contrast, only ~6% of the total radioactivity was retained on preimmune IgG columns (data not shown). The same relative proportion of bound and unbound labeled complex was found over a range in protein concentrations loaded onto the immunoaffinity column, indicating that the unadsorbed fraction was not due to column overloading (data not shown). Size-exclusion analysis showed that the unadsorbed fraction was ~400 kDa and not free ligand that had dissociated from the receptor (data not shown). Incubation overnight of the solubilized extract with anti-receptor IgG apparently results in a greater dissociation of free receptor from the 400-kDa complex than seen in the Superose 12 HB 10/30 studies (which were done without any prior incubation), accounting for only 50% of the receptor appearing in the 400-kDa form.
|
Immunoblotting of both unbound and eluted fractions from the
immunoaffinity column, using antisera directed against the receptor, indicated that about equal amounts of the receptor in the crude extract
were in both fractions (Fig. 7, bottom). Immunoblots of the
unadsorbed and eluted fractions with antisera directed against G
q/11 and G
i3 indicated that G protein
was present only in the unadsorbed fractions (Fig. 7,
bottom). In view of the findings shown in Fig. 4, the
results indicate that the interaction of receptor with G protein
prevented the receptor from being immunoadsorbed to the
anti-V1a receptor affinity column. Only free receptor was bound to the column.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phaa-D-Tyr(Et)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Lys-Pro-Arg-NH2
has been shown to be a highly potent and selective linear
V1 octapeptide antagonist (15). To increase the usefulness
of this analogue, Manning et al. (9) added a
carboxyl-terminal Tyr-NH2 as a potential radioiodination site. The noniodinated analogue was a strong V1 antagonist
(p2 = 8.64) and very weak V2 agonist (~0.001
unit/mg) (9). The current report is the first characterization of the
iodinated peptide. The apparent Kd
value of 0.168 nM for iodinated antagonist-liver membrane interactions is approximately one third greater than the value
(0.06 nM) observed for the analogue containing an
arginine at position 6 instead of a lysine (10) and ~1 order of
magnitude less than an analogue containing valine in position 4 instead of glutamine and having a Tyr-NH2 carboxyl-terminal
residue at position 8 (18). Aside from the obvious advantages of having a highly selective and high affinity antagonist that can be
radioiodinated for use with small amounts of tissue or for
autoradiographic studies, the lysine residue at position 6 allows the
formation of derivatives for photoaffinity and fluorescent labeling and
for biotinylation. An additional important application for the
antagonist is delineated in the current study: the ability to maintain
stable V1a receptor/G protein complexes for identifying the
G proteins and for use with conformational probes. Our findings, using
both the antagonist and receptor antibodies, suggest that receptor/G
protein-effector enzyme complexes are preformed and relatively stable
in the absence of agonist. In addition to the V1a receptor,
other G protein-coupled receptors seem to exist in preformed complexes
with G proteins; these include A1 adenosine (19), C5a (20),
opioid (21), and
2-adrenergic (22) receptors.
The identification of Gq/11 coupling to the V1a
receptor is consistent with the results of Wange et al.
(23), who found increased photoaffinity labeling of Gq/11
with [32P]
-azidoanilido GTP after treatment of rat
liver membranes with AVP. Activation of Gq/11 likely
accounts for AVP stimulation of increases in cytosolic levels of free
Ca2+ (24) and phosphoinositide release (25) in the liver.
The association of G
i3 with the V1a receptor
was an unexpected finding but in retrospect is consistent with several
earlier observations: AVP inhibited both glucagon- and
forskolin-induced hepatic cAMP accumulation, presumably by a direct
effect on adenylyl cyclase activity (26). Rat hepatocytes treated with
pertussis toxin, which inhibits Gi but not
Gq/11, lost both AVP- and GTP
S-stimulated Ca2+ influx, under conditions in which AVP-stimulated
release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores was unaffected
(27). Inhibition was also obtained with
anti-G
i1-2 antibody and
G
i2 peptide but not with a
G
i3 peptide (27). Additional studies have indicated that
Gi2 is involved in AVP and store-activated Ca2+
inflow in hepatocytes (28). Because the anti-G
i3
antibodies used in our study cross-react with
G
i2, it is not possible to determine the
relative contribution of each to the 400-kDa complex. AVP stimulation
of arachidonic acid release by rat aortic smooth muscle cells is also
mediated by a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein, and the effect is
independent of phosphoinositide hydrolysis (28). Gi3 has
also been shown to regulate PLC-mediated intracellular Ca2+
release and PLA-2-mediated arachidonic acid release in Chinese hamster
ovary cells (29). These collective observations strongly suggest that
pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins, such as Gi, are
important mediators of AVP action.
The association of Gs with a smaller fraction of
V1a receptors is a new observation and might be indicative
of a mechanism by which AVP opens voltage-gated membrane
Ca2+ channels (30). Differences in the amounts of labeled
receptor complex immunoadsorbed by the different G protein antibodies
could be an indication of the relative proportion of V1a
receptor associated with each
subunit subtype, but we cannot draw
any definitive conclusions without knowing the affinities of each of
the antisera for their respective epitopes.
Polyclonal antibodies to G
q/11, G
i3,
G
s/olf and G
14 were directed
against peptides corresponding to the carboxyl termini of their
respective G
subunits. G
14 IgG was ineffective in immunoadsorbing any of the V1a
receptor complex, even though the antiserum should bind
G
q/11 because of overlap in amino acid sequence between
the two peptides. Because we used polyclonal antisera, there might be a
preponderance of antibodies directed against
G
14 rather than
G
q in the particular preparation of
antiserum used, accounting for its lack of effect. Antibody directed
against the amino-terminal region of G
q was
not effective, perhaps because of inaccessibility of the amino-terminal
region in either the native or complexed conformation. The amino
terminus of G
q has been shown to be
important for its interactions with PLC-
1 and m1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor (31).
We also found that the V1a receptors are associated with
PLC and PLA-2. PLC has previously been shown to be associated with solubilized rat liver V1a receptors (32). The principal
fraction of effector enzymes associated with the V1a
receptor was PLC-
1. A smaller, but significant fraction of
receptors was bound to PLC-
2, suggesting that AVP stimulation of
inositol phosphate production results from activation of more than one
isoform of PLC. Activation of PLC-
2 occurs by tyrosine
phosphorylation, which involves interactions between PLC-
and
receptor tyrosine kinases (33). The mechanism of interaction between
V1a receptor and PLC-
2 is not presently understood, but
activation of PLC-
2 might be a pathway involved in the mitogenic
activity of AVP (34-35).
We found that when receptor is part of the 400-kDa complex, it does not react with antibodies directed against the region near the carboxyl-terminal end. The antibody, however, binds to uncomplexed V1a receptor and to SDS-denatured receptor. A possible explanation for these findings is that interaction of the receptor with G protein involves the carboxyl-terminal tail, which is hindered from interaction with receptor antibodies when complexed to G proteins. The carboxyl termini of several G protein-coupled receptors, along with specific cytoplasmic loops, have been implicated in G protein interactions (36, 37). Splice variants of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the prostaglandin EP3 receptor subtypes specify the specific isotype of G protein that is coupled (i.e., Gs, Gi, or Gs/Gi/Gq) (38). Schneider et al. (40) found that a core region of the PTH receptor composed of the three intracellular loops can interact promiscuously with different G proteins and that the carboxyl terminus of the full-length receptor directs the specific interaction with Gs. In addition to contributing to G protein isotype specificity, the carboxyl-terminal domain can be essential for activity. Irie et al. (50) found that EP3 receptors truncated at the carboxyl terminus retained the ability to physically associate with Gi2 but that there was no forskolin-induced inhibition cAMP accumulation or GTPase stimulation.
We are not certain whether changes in the accessibility of the antibody to the region near the carboxyl-terminal domain of the V1a receptor reflect overall conformational changes in the molecule on interaction with other proteins in the complex or more local conformational changes due to interactions with G or other proteins. Because there are both potential palmitoylation and phosphorylation sites in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the V1a receptor (1), inaccessibility of the antibody may be a reflection of covalent modification that are requisite for interaction with other proteins. The antibody, in conjunction with 125I-LVPA, should prove useful in future investigations to clarify whether covalent modifications of the vasopressin V1a receptor are involved in G protein coupling.
In summary, the inability of the antagonist to stimulate
[35S]GTP
S binding is indicative of the inability of
the antagonist-occupied receptor to assume a conformation that
activates G proteins. As a consequence, the preformed receptor/G
protein/effector enzyme complex is maintained in the presence of
antagonist. Thus, 125I-LVPA is an important tool, along
with conformational probes, to characterize previously unrecognized G
protein and effector enzymes that interact with the V1a
receptor. Furthermore, the high specific activity of the labeled
antagonist, compared with tritiated compounds, and the high affinity
for V1a receptors allow the use of relatively small amounts
of membrane material for these studies.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Solweig Soloff for expert technical assistance, Dr. Alexander Hinko for initially labeling the AVP antagonist, and Dr. Maurice Manning for the gift of the AVP antagonist.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 5, 1996; Accepted October 22, 1996
1 A.K. is deceased.
2 Current affiliation: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT 06492.
3 Care of the animals was in accord with institutional guidelines.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Melvyn S. Soloff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-1062. E-mail: melvyn.soloff{at}utmb.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AVP, arginine vasopressin;
GTP
S, guanosine-5
-O-(3-thio)triphosphate;
LVPA, phenylacetyl-D-Tyr(Et)-Phe-Gln-Asn-Lys-Pro-Arg-Tyr-NH2;
PLC, phospholipase C;
PLA, phospholipase A;
SDS, sodium dodecyl
sulfate;
EGTA, ethylene glycol bis(
-aminoethyl
ether)-N,N,N
,N
-tetraacetic
acid;
HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid;
CHAPSO, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Lolait, S. J., A. M. O'Carroll, and M. J. Brownstein. Molecular biology of vasopressin receptors. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 771:273-392 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Fitzgerald, T. J.,
R. J. Uhing, and
J. H. Exton.
Solubilization of the vasopressin receptor from rat liver plasma membranes.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:16871-16877 (1986) |
| 3. | Bojanic, D. and J. N. Fain. Guanine nucleotide regulation of [3H]vasopressin binding to liver plasma membranes and solubilized receptors: evidence for the involvement of a guanine nucleotide regulatory protein. Biochem. J. 240:361-365 (1986)[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Fishman, J. B.,
B. F. Dickey, and
R. E. Fine.
Purification and characterization of the rat liver vasopressin (V1) receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
262:14049-14055 (1987) |
| 5. | Georgoussi, Z., S. J. Taylor, S. B. Bocckino, and J. H. Exton. Purification of the hepatic vasopressin receptor using a novel affinity column. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1055:69-74 (1990)[Medline]. |
| 6. | Estrada, E. F., V. Barra, C. E. Caorsi, S. Troncoso, N. Ruiz-Opazo, and C. B. Gonzalez. Identification of the V1 vasopressin receptor by chemical cross-linking and ligand affinity blotting. Biochemistry 30:8611-8616 (1991)[Medline]. |
| 7. | Manning, M. and W. H. Sawyer. Design, synthesis and some uses of receptor-specific agonists and antagonists of vasopressin and oxytocin. J. Recept. Res. 13:195-214 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 8. | Manning, M., W. Y. Chan, and W. H. Sawyer. Design of cyclic and linear peptide antagonists of vasopressin and oxytocin: current status and future directions. Regul. Pept. 45:279-283 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 9. | Manning, M., A. S. Kolodziejczyk, A. M. Kolodziejczyk, S. Stoev, W. A. Klis, N. C. N. C. Wo, and W. H. Sawyer. Highly potent and selective Tyr-NH29-containing linear V1 antagonists and D-Tyr2-containing linear V2 agonists: potential radioiodinated ligands for vasopressin receptors, in Proceedings of the 21st European Peptide Symposium (E. Giralt and D. Andreu, eds.). ESCOM Science Publishers BV, Leiden, The Netherlands, 665-667 (1991). |
| 10. | Schmidt, A., S. Audigier, C. Barberis, S. Jard, M. Manning, A. S. Kolodziejczyk, and W. H. Sawyer. A radioiodinated linear vasopressin antagonist: a ligand with high affinity and specificity for V1a receptors. FEBS Lett. 282:77-81 (1991)[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Aragay, A. M.,
A. Katz, and
M. I. Simon.
The G q and G 11 proteins couple the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor to phospholipase C in GH3 rat pituitary cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:24983-24988 (1991) |
| 12. | Hinko, A. and M. S. Soloff. Characterization of oxytocin receptors in rabbit amnion involved in the production of PGE2. Endocrinology 130:3547-3553 (1992)[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Hepler, J. R.,
T. Kozasa,
A. V. Smrcka,
M. I. Simon,
S. G. Rhee,
P. C. Sternweis, and
A. G. Gilman.
Purification from Sf9 cells and characterization of recombinant Gq and G11 : activation of purified phospholipase C isozymes by G subunits.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:14367-14375 (1993) |
| 14. | Soloff, M. S., A. R. Shaw, L. E. Gentry, H. Marquardt, and P. Vasilenko. Demonstration of relaxin precursors in pregnant rat ovaries with antisera to bacterially expressed rat prorelaxin. Endocrinology 130:1844-1851 (1992)[Abstract]. |
| 15. | Manning, M., S. Stoev, A. Kolodziejczyk, W. A. Klis, M. Kruszynski, A. Misicka, A. Olma, N. C. Wo, and W. H. Sawyer. Design of potent and selective linear antagonists of vasopressor (V1-receptor) responses to vasopressin. J. Med. Chem. 33:3079-3086 (1990)[Medline]. |
| 16. | Soloff, M. S., M. A. Fernström, and M. J. Fernström. Vasopressin and oxytocin receptors on plasma membranes from rat mammary gland: demonstration of vasopressin receptors by stimulation of inositol phosphate formation, and oxytocin receptors by binding of a specific 125I-labeled oxytocin antagonist, D(CH2)51[Tyr(Me)2,Thr4,Tyr-NH29]OVT. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 67:152-162 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Higashijima, T.,
S. Uzu,
T. Nakajima, and
E. M. Ross.
Mastoparan, a peptide toxin from wasp venom, mimics receptors by activating GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins).
J. Biol. Chem.
263:6491-6494 (1988) |
| 18. |
Thibonnier, M.,
A. L. Bayer, and
Z. Madhun.
Linear V1-vascular vasopressin antagonists suitable for radioiodination, biotinylation, and fluorescent labeling.
Am. J. Physiol.
265:E906-E913 (1993) |
| 19. | Leung, E., K. A. Jacobson, and R. D. Green. Analysis of agonist-antagonist interactions at A1 adenosine receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 38:72-83 (1990)[Abstract]. |
| 20. |
Siciliano, S. J.,
T. E. Rollins, and
M. S. Springer.
Interaction between the C5a receptor and Gi in both the membrane-bound and detergent-solubilized states.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:19568-19574 (1990) |
| 21. |
Polastron, J.,
P. Jauzac, and
J. C. Meunier.
The -opioid receptor in neuroblastoma X glioma NG 108-15 hybrid cells is strongly precoupled to a G-protein.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
226:133-139 (1992)[Medline].
|
| 22. |
Neubig, R. R.,
R. D. Gantzos, and
W. J. Thomsen.
Mechanism of agonist and antagonist binding to 2-adrenergic receptors: evidence for a precoupled receptor-guanine nucleotide protein complex.
Biochemistry
27:2374-2384 (1988)[Medline].
|
| 23. |
Wange, R. L.,
A. V. Smrcka,
P. C. Sternweis, and
J. H. Exton.
Photoaffinity labeling of two rat liver plasma membrane proteins with [32P] -azidoanilido GTP in response to vasopressin: immunologic identification as alpha subunits of the Gq class of G proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:11409-11412 (1991) |
| 24. |
Thomas, A. P.,
J. S. Marks,
K. E. Coll, and
J. R. Williamson.
Quantitation and early kinetics of inositol lipid changes induced by vasopressin in isolated and cultured hepatocytes.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:5716-5725 (1983) |
| 25. | Blackmore, P. F., C. J. Lynch, R. J. Uhing, T. Fitzgerald, S. B. Bocckino, and J. H. Exton. Role of guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins and inositol phosphates in the hormone-induced mobilization of hepatocyte calcium. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 232:169-182 (1988)[Medline]. |
| 26. | Morgan, N. G., C. C. Shipp, and J. H. Exton. Studies on the mechanism of inhibition of hepatic cAMP accumulation by vasopressin. FEBS Lett. 163:277-281 (1983)[Medline]. |
| 27. | Berven, L. A., B. P. Hughes, and G. J. Barritt. A slowly ADP-ribosylated pertussis-toxin-sensitive GTP-binding regulatory protein is required for vasopressin-stimulated Ca2+ inflow in hepatocytes. Biochem. J. 299:399-407 (1994). |
| 28. | Ito, Y., O. Kozawa, H. Tokuda, J. Kotoyori, and Y. Oiso. Vasopressin induces arachidonic acid release through pertussis toxin-sensitive GTP-binding protein in aortic smooth muscle cells: independence from phosphoinositide hydrolysis. J. Cell. Biochem. 53:169-175 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 29. |
Hunt, T. W.,
R. C. Carroll, and
E. G. Peralta.
Heterotrimeric G proteins containing G i3 regulate multiple effector enzymes in the same cell: activation of phospholipases C and A2 and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:29565-29570 (1994) |
| 30. |
Mattera, R.,
M. P. Graziano,
A. Yatani,
Z. Zhou,
R. Graf,
J. Codina,
L. Birnbaumer,
A. G. Gilman, and
A. M. Brown.
Splice variants of the subunit of the G protein Gs activate both adenylyl cyclase and calcium channels.
Science (Washington D. C.)
243:804-807 (1989) |
| 31. |
Hepler, J. R.,
G. H. Biddlecome,
C. Kleuss,
L. A. Camp,
S. L. Hofmann,
E. M. Ross, and
A. G. Gilman.
Functional importance of the amino terminus of Gq .
J. Biol. Chem.
271:496-504 (1996) |
| 32. | Aiyar, N., C. F. Bennett, P. Nambi, W. Valinski, M. Angioli, M. Minnich, and S. T. Crooke. Solubilization of rat liver vasopressin receptors as a complex with a guanine-nucleotide-binding protein and phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C. Biochem. J. 261:63-70 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 33. |
Margolis, B.,
N. Li,
A. Koch,
M. Mohammadi,
D. R. Hurwitz,
A. Zilberstein,
A. Ullrich,
T. Pawson, and
J. Schlessinger.
The tyrosine phosphorylated carboxy terminus of the EGF receptor is a binding site for GAP and PLC- .
EMBO J.
9:4375-4380 (1990)[Medline].
|
| 34. |
Ganz, M. B.,
S. K. Pekar,
M. C. Perfetto, and
R. B. Sterzel.
Arginine vasopressin promotes growth of rat glomerular mesangial cells in culture.
Am. J. Physiol.
255:F898-F906 (1988) |
| 35. | Serradeil-Le Gal, C., B. Bourrie, D. Raufaste, P. Carayon, C. Garcia, J. P. Maffrand, G. Le Fur, and P. Casellas. Effect of a new, potent, non-peptide V1a vasopressin antagonist, SR 49059, on the binding and the mitogenic activity of vasopressin on Swiss 3T3 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 47:633-641 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 36. |
Münch, G.,
C. Dees,
M. Hekman, and
D. Palm.
Multisite contacts involved in coupling of the -adrenergic receptor with the stimulatory guanine-nucleotide-binding regulatory protein: structural and functional studies by -receptor-site-specific synthetic peptides.
Eur. J. Biochem.
198:357-364 (1991)[Medline].
|
| 37. | König, B. and M. Gratzel. Site of dopamine D1 receptor binding to Gs protein mapped with synthetic peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1223:261-266 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 38. | Namba, T., Y. Sugimoto, M. Negishi, A. Irie, F. Ushikubi, A. Kakizuka, S. Ito, A. Ichikawa, and S. Narumiya. Alternative splicing of C-terminal tail of prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP3 determines G-protein specificity. Nature (Lond.) 365:166-170 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 39. | Schneider, H., J. H. M. Feyen, and K. Seuwen. A C-terminally truncated human parathyroid hormone receptor is functional and activates multiple G proteins. FEBS Lett. 351:281-285 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 40. | Irie, A., Y. Sugimoto, T. Namba, T. Asano, A. Ichikawa, and M. Negishi. The C-terminus of the prostaglandin-E-receptor EP3 subtype is essential for activation of GTP-binding protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 224:161-166 (1994)[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. J. Pitkow, C. A. Sharer, X. Ren, T. R. Insel, E. F. Terwilliger, and L. J. Young Facilitation of Affiliation and Pair-Bond Formation by Vasopressin Receptor Gene Transfer into the Ventral Forebrain of a Monogamous Vole J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7392 - 7396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hoare, J. A. Copland, Z. Strakova, K. Ives, Y.-J. Jeng, M. R. Hellmich, and M. S. Soloff The Proximal Portion of the COOH Terminus of the Oxytocin Receptor Is Required for Coupling to Gq, but Not Gi. INDEPENDENT MECHANISMS FOR ELEVATING INTRACELLULAR CALCIUM CONCENTRATIONS FROM INTRACELLULAR STORES J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 1999; 274(40): 28682 - 28689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tran, N. Stelly, T. Tordjmann, T. Durroux, M. N. Dufour, A. Forchioni, R. Seyer, M. Claret, and G. Guillon Distribution of Signaling Molecules Involved in Vasopressin-induced Ca2+ Mobilization in Rat Hepatocyte Multiplets J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 1999; 47(5): 601 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Abel, N. Wittau, T. Wieland, G. Schultz, and F. Kalkbrenner Cell Cycle-dependent Coupling of the Vasopressin V1a Receptor to Different G Proteins J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2000; 275(42): 32543 - 32551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||