MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daunt, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kobilka, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daunt, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kobilka, B. K.

0026-895X/97/050711-10$3.00/0
Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY 51:711-720 (1997).

Subtype-Specific Intracellular Trafficking of alpha 2-Adrenergic Receptors

David A. Daunt, Carl Hurt, Lutz Hein, Jaana Kallio, Felix Feng, and Brian K. Kobilka

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 (D.A.D., C.H.), Institut für Pharmakologie, Universität Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany (L.H.), Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland (J.K.), Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 (F.F.), and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 (B.K.K.)

    Summary
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The three alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes (alpha 2a, alpha 2b, and alpha 2c) are highly homologous G protein-coupled receptors. These receptors all couple to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins and have relatively similar pharmacological properties. To further explore functional differences between these receptors, we used immunocytochemical techniques to compare the ability of the three alpha 2-receptor subtypes to undergo agonist-mediated internalization. The alpha 2a-receptor does not internalize after agonist treatment. In contrast, we observed that the alpha 2b-receptor is able to undergo agonist-induced internalization and seems to follow the same endosomal pathway used by the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Attempts to examine internalization of the alpha 2c-receptor were complicated by the fact that the majority of the alpha 2c-receptor resides in the endoplasmic reticulum and cis/medial Golgi and there is relatively little cell surface localization. Nevertheless, we were able to detect some internalization of the alpha 2c-receptor after prolonged agonist treatment. However, we observed no significant movement of alpha 2c-receptor from the intracellular pool to the plasma membrane during a 4-hr treatment of cells with cycloheximide, suggesting that these cells are unable to process alpha 2c-receptors in the same way they process the alpha 2a or alpha 2b subtypes.

    Introduction
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The alpha 2-AR family consists of three highly homologous subtypes: alpha 2a, alpha 2b, and alpha 2c (1, 2). They belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors and mediate the physiological actions of the endogenous catecholamines, epinephrine and norepinephrine. These receptors are targets for therapeutic agents for hypertension, anesthesia, and analgesia. Although the three alpha 2-ARs are highly homologous (50-60% identity), several differences in their coupling to G proteins alpha  subunits and their desensitization have been reported. In reconstitution experiments. Kurose et al. (3) have shown that the human alpha 2a- and alpha 2c-ARs couple to the same G proteins, with only slight differences in efficiency. In contrast, using transfected cell lines, others (4) have shown that the alpha 2c subtype (the rat RG10 receptor) preferentially couples to Go, whereas alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-ARs couple to Gi (5). Initial studies indicated that alpha 2-ARs transduce their signal through a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein (Gi or Go); however, several more recent studies have demonstrated that all three alpha 2-AR subtypes can stimulate adenylyl cyclase in pertussis toxin-treated cells (6). The EC50 value of agonists for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by alpha 2-ARs, presumably through Gs, is higher than the EC50 value for inhibition of adenylyl cyclase through Gi (6). The three alpha 2-AR subtypes seem to differ in their efficiency of coupling to Gs (6). Moreover, the capacity and efficacy of Gs coupling by the three alpha 2-ARs are dependent on the agonist (7) and the cell line used to express the alpha 2-AR subtype (6, 8). Similarly, others have shown that depending on the cell line studied, alpha 2-ARs can inhibit or increase cellular cAMP levels, suggesting that these differences are due to coupling to different G proteins or isoforms of adenylate cyclase (9). Cotecchia et al. (10) demonstrated that alpha 2a- and alpha 2c-ARs can stimulate phospholipase C activity. The alpha 2a-AR has also been shown to inhibit voltage-dependent calcium currents and increase inwardly rectifying potassium currents (11); however, the ability of alpha 2b and alpha 2c to couple to these ion channels has not been reported. Finally, differences in receptor regulation have been described for the three alpha 2-ARs. Agonist-promoted desensitization has been observed for all alpha 2-AR subtypes; however, the extent of desensitization is greater for the alpha 2a subtype (12, 13). It has also been shown that phosphorylation of the alpha 2a-AR is required for desensitization (14, 15).

In addition to these functional differences in signal transduction and regulation, recent studies have identified differences in the intracellular trafficking of this receptor family. The alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-ARs have been observed to reside primarily in the plasma membrane, whereas a large portion of the alpha 2c-AR is found in an intracellular compartment (16, 17). We previously reported that there is no detectable agonist-induced internalization of the alpha 2a-AR in cells in which rapid agonist-induced internalization of the beta 2-AR is seen (16). Previously, agonist-induced internalization of the alpha 2b and alpha 2c-AR subtypes have not been thoroughly characterized using immunocytochemical techniques; however, these receptors are structurally and functionally more similar to the alpha 2a-AR than to the beta 2-AR and might be predicted to have similar trafficking properties. In this study, we examined the steady state distribution and agonist-induced subcellular sorting of each of the three alpha 2-AR subtypes in the same cell line. We observed that each subtype has distinctive trafficking properties. The alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-ARs are located on the plasma membrane at steady state, whereas most of the alpha 2c-AR is found in the endoplasmic reticulum. The alpha 2b- and alpha 2c-AR subtypes are internalized into endosomes after exposure to agonists, whereas the alpha 2a subtype is not.

    Experimental Procedures
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials. [3H]Atipamezole (50 Ci/mmol) and dexmedetomidine were kindly provided by Orion-Farmos (Turku, Finland). All other ligands and chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) unless indicated.

Plasmid construction and receptor expression in tissue culture cells. All cells were grown in DMEM (University of California, San Francisco Cell Culture Facility) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gemini Bio-Products, Calabasas, CA) and 25 µg/ml gentamicin (Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). The three mouse alpha 2-ARs were cloned into pBC 12BI, pREP4, or pcDNA3 expression vectors (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA) and epitope-tagged as previously described (16). Briefly, the 12CA5 epitope (sequence MGYPYDVPDYA) was inserted at the amino terminus of the three mouse alpha 2-ARs, using oligonucleotide linker-adapters into the NcoI site located at the 5'-end of the receptor coding sequence. The sequence of the recombinant alpha 2-ARs was confirmed by dideoxy sequencing. To monitor the trafficking pathway of alpha 2-ARs between intracellular organelles and the cell surface, a double epitope tag with a thrombin cleavage site between the two epitopes was added to the amino termini of the alpha 2a- and alpha 2c-ARs (see Fig. 6). For this purpose, part of the extracellular amino-terminal sequence of a flag epitope-tagged thrombin receptor (18, 19) was combined with the coding sequences of the murine alpha 2a- and alpha 2c-ARs. The thrombin epitope tag consists of the following domains: prolactin signal sequence, flag epitope (italic), amino acids 53-64 of the human thrombin receptor containing a thrombin cleavage site (dash) and the hirudin domain epitope (bold) (20) (amino acid sequence: MDSKGSSLLCQGVVSDYKDDDDVDATLDPR-SFLLRNPNDKY EPFWEDEEKNESGLTEYRLVSINDS). The sequence of the recombinant alpha 2-ARs was confirmed by dideoxy sequencing and subcloned into the pREP4 plasmid for expression in eukaryotic cells. The thrombin epitope tag can be detected by immunostaining using the monoclonal M1 antibody (Kodak IBI, Rochester, NY) recognizing the flag epitope and a polyclonal antiserum that was raised against a peptide containing the hirudin epitope domain of the human thrombin receptor (19). Epitope-tagged receptors were transfected by either DEAE-Dextran, calcium-phosphate precipitation, or electroporation methods. Stable cell lines were selected under 250-500 µg/ml G418 (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) or 200 IU/ml hygromycin (Boehringer-Mannheim) in the media.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Amino-terminal thrombin/M1 Flag epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR. A recombinant alpha 2c-AR was constructed with an additional amino-terminal sequence containing the M1 Flag epitope (first box), preceding a thrombin cleavage site (arrow) and the hirudin epitope (second box). When this epitope-tagged receptor is present in the plasma membrane of intact cells, thrombin treatment cleaves off the flag epitope, resulting in a loss of staining for flag, but retains staining for hirudin. Therefore, this construct allowed the differentiation between intracellular alpha 2c-AR, which had not yet been delivered to the plasma membrane (stains positive for both epitopes), and receptor presented to the plasma membrane, which had its M1 flag epitope irreversibly cleaved by thrombin (stains positive for hirudin only). This thrombin epitope-tagged receptor binds the antagonist atipamezole and agonists epinephrine and norepinephrine similar to wild-type alpha 2c-AR (Table 1) and shows subcellular distribution typical of the wild-type alpha 2c-AR (see Fig. 7, E and F).

Radioligand binding assay. For binding studies, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected using the DEAE-Dextran method, and cell membranes were harvested 3 days after transfection as previously described (21). Binding experiments were performed in 500-µl volumes of binding buffer (75 mM Tris, 12.5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) for 90 min at room temperature. The bound radioactivity was separated from free by filtration through GF/C filters and washed three times with 5 ml of ice-cold binding buffer using a Brandel cell harvester. Saturation isotherms were performed by incubating the membranes with varying concentrations of [3H]atipamezole. Nonspecific binding was determined by the addition of 100 µM yohimbine. Competition binding experiments were carried out by incubating membranes with varying concentrations of competing ligand and 2 nM [3H]atipamezole. Nonspecific binding was determined by the addition of 100 µM yohimbine. Equilibrium dissociation constants were determined from saturation isotherms and competition curves using GraphPAD software (San Diego, CA). All binding experiments were done in duplicate and repeated at least three times.

Production of antisera. The antigenic epitopes selected for the polyclonal antibodies were the carboxyl termini of each alpha 2-AR. The antigenic peptides were synthesized and MBS-coupled to thyroglobulin, purified, and injected into New Zealand White rabbits. Polyclonal sera directed against the alpha 2b and alpha 2c epitopes were affinity-purified over peptide coupled to epoxy-activated Sepharose columns and eluted with either M KSCN, pH 7.4, or 20 mM glycine, pH 3.0. The three polyclonal antisera are specific for their respective alpha 2-AR subtype and do not cross-react with other alpha 2-AR subtypes at the dilutions used (alpha 2a, 1:500; alpha 2b and alpha 2c affinity-purified antisera, 1:100; data not shown). The previously described beta 2 antibody was kindly provided by Dr. M. Von Zastrow (University of California, San Francisco).

Immunocytochemical studies and techniques. Receptor trafficking and subcellular distribution were examined using indirect immunocytochemical staining. Nonspecific binding was blocked with blotto (5% nonfat dry milk in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6) for 45 min. For staining in permeabilized cells, nonionic detergent (Nonidet P-40, Sigma) was added to blotto incubations to a final concentration of 0.2%. Cells were stained using 12CA5 hemagglutinin antibody (Berkeley Antibody Co., Berkeley, CA) monoclonal antibody (at 1:500 in blotto). For nonpermeabilized studies, receptors present on the plasma membrane were stained by incubation of live cells grown on coverslips at 37° with 6% CO2 for 60 min with 12CA5 monoclonal antibody at 1:500 in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. After a 60-min incubation, cells were washed with cold PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 30 min and then rinsed three times in room-temperature PBS. Nonpermeabilized immunocytochemistry was also performed by growing cells on coverslips for 2 or 3 days and then fixing them for 30 min in 4% formaldehyde and deleting detergent from the blotto. Secondary antibodies were either fluorescein-conjugated (fluorescein isothiocyanate) or Texas red-conjugated directed against the species of primary antibody used (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA).

One day after transient transfections, cells were trypsinized off tissue culture dishes and replated onto sterilized cover slips. For steady state studies, cells were grown on coverslips for 2 days and then fixed in 4% formaldehyde or 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min, followed by three washes with room-temperature PBS. For adrenergic agonist treatment studies, after 2 days' growth on coverslips, cells were incubated for 30 min at 37° with 6% CO2 in either serum-free DMEM (control) or agonist in serum-free DMEM. After incubations, the medium was aspirated, and cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 45 min at room temperature and then washed three times with room-temperature PBS. Studies involving basal trafficking of alpha 2c thrombin epitope-tagged receptors were carried out in the absence of agonist after a 30-min treatment with 5 nM thrombin to cleave off the M1 epitope from receptors present on the plasma membrane. The effect of agonist stimulation on alpha 2c thrombin epitope-tagged receptor trafficking was examined by exposing cells to 10 µM epinephrine in DMEM with 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and 10 µM cycloheximide to inhibit de novo protein synthesis for 30 min at 37°. Steady state trafficking of the cytosolic alpha 2c thrombin epitope-tagged receptor pool was also studied in the absence of de novo protein synthesis by treated cells with 10 µM cycloheximide for 4 hr. During inhibition of protein synthesis, cells were concomitantly treated with 5 nM thrombin to remove the M1 epitope from all receptors that were translocated to the plasma membrane.

For studies using thrombin epitope-tagged alpha 2-ARs, after 2 days of growth on coverslips, cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated at 37° with 6% CO2 in DMEM with 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, for 30-45 min. After various treatments as outlined above, cells were rinsed three time with PBS and fixed using cold methanol (-20°) for 5 min. After fixation, cells were washed three times with PBS supplemented with Ca2+/Mg2+ over a 5-min period. To block nonspecific binding, 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS with Ca2+/Mg2+ supplemented with 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, was applied to cells for a period of 30-45 min. Selective dual antibody labeling of cells was performed in the blocking agent applied at room temperature for 1 hr with either the monoclonal M1 antibody (Kodak-IBI) at 1:500 or a polyclonal antibody to the hirudin epitope (Dr. S. Coughlin, University of California, San Francisco, CA) at 1:1000.

Colocalization immunocytochemical studies were performed on either the wild-type alpha 2c or 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR and a variety of antibodies selective to various intracellular compartments. Cells were costained with either the 12CA5 monoclonal antibody or affinity-purified polyclonal antibody directed against the wild-type alpha 2c-AR as described above and one of the following: lgp120 (Dr. S. Green, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA) at 1:1000; cation-independent M6PR (Dr. William Brown, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) antibody at 1:500; mannosidase II (Berkeley Antibody, Berkeley, CA) at 1:500; calnexin (StressGen Biotechnologies, Victoria, BC, Canada) at 1:750; or BiP (GRP-78; Affinity Bioreagents, Nashanic Station, NJ) at 1:500. After primary antibody labeling, the cells were rinsed three times with PBS supplemented with Ca2+/Mg2+. Blocking agent was again applied for 30 min, and the aforementioned conjugated secondary antibodies were applied in blocking agent for 1 hr at room temperature. Cell were subsequently rinsed three times with PBS supplemented with Ca2+/Mg2+, and the specimens were mounted on glass slides for viewing.

Conventional immunofluorescence microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope with a Zeiss Neofluar 63×/1.25 or Zeiss Neofluar 100×/1.3 objective. Confocal microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Axioskop microscope and a Sarastro Phoibos 1000 instrument with either a Zeiss Apochromat 40×/1.0 or Zeiss Apochromat 63×/NA 1.4 objective, a 50-µM confocal pinhole, and optical filters set as described in the manufacturer's instructions for fluorescein isothiocyanate/Texas red imaging.

ELISA. For quantification of receptor internalization, ELISA assays were performed. Briefly, nonclonal stable HEK 293 cell lines were plated onto 24-well tissue culture dishes. To improve adhesion of this cell line to plastic, the wells were treated for 30 min with 0.0005% poly-L-lysine in PBS immediately before plating out ~10 × 104 cells/well. At ~48 hr later, when cells were ~75% confluent, they were incubated for 30 min at 37° with 6% CO2 in serum-free DMEM or 10 µM norepinephrine in serum-free DMEM. After incubations, the medium was aspirated, and cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature. Wells were washed three times with room-temperature PBS. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 1% BSA for 45 min with occasional gentle shaking. The 12CA5 antibody was diluted to 1:1000 in 1% BSA for 60 min, followed by three gentle PBS washes. Cells were briefly reblocked with 1% BSA for 15 min and then incubated with anti-mouse conjugated alkaline phosphatase (BioRad, Richmond, CA) diluted 1:1000 in 1% BSA for 60 min with occasional gentle shaking. Wells were then washed three times with PBS, and a colorimetric alkaline phosphate substrate was added. Plates were continuously but gently shaken (40 rotations/min) until an adequate color change had occurred, at which time a 100-µl sample was taken for colorimetric readings. Nontransfected cells were studied concurrently to determine background. All experiments were done in triplicate.

    Results
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Immunocytochemical techniques were used to examine the distribution of alpha 2-AR subtypes expressed in COS 7, HEK 293, MDCK, NRK and Rat1 fibroblast cell lines. Subtype-specific rabbit polyclonal antibodies were prepared against a carboxyl-terminal peptide as described in Experimental Procedures. The specificity of these antibodies was verified by staining untransfected COS 7 cells or COS 7 cells transfected with each of the alpha 2-AR subtypes (data not shown). In addition, we used receptors modified with an amino-terminal 12CA5 epitope, which is recognized by a commercially available monoclonal antibody. The amino-terminal tag permits examination of cell surface receptor density in nonpermeabilized cells. We previously observed that the use of this epitope does not alter the trafficking of the beta 2-AR (16). Moreover, the distribution and trafficking of epitope tagged alpha 2-ARs (examined with either 12CA5 monoclonal antibody or polyclonal subtype-specific antibody) are indistinguishable from those of nontagged receptors (examined with polyclonal antibody; data not shown). Binding affinity for the antagonist atipamezole, the endogenous catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine, and the specific alpha 2 agonist dexmedetomidine are also comparable between wild-type and epitope-tagged alpha 2-ARs (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Equilibrium dissociation constants of various adrenergic ligands for wild-type and amino-terminal 12CA5 or thrombin epitope-tagged mouse alpha 2-adrenergic receptors expressed in COS-7 cells

Binding assays were performed as described in Experimental Procedures. Values (in nM) represent an average of at least three independent binding assays.

Fig. 1 shows the distribution of the three alpha 2-AR subtypes in HEK 293 cells at steady state and after agonist treatment. It can be seen that alpha 2a and alpha 2b subtypes are predominantly localized in the plasma membrane at steady state, whereas a large portion of alpha 2c-AR is found in an intracellular compartment. After agonist treatment (10 µM norepinephrine) for 30 min at 37°, the alpha 2b-AR is internalized, but the alpha 2a subtype remains in the plasma membrane. This analysis does not allow us to determine whether the alpha 2c-AR is internalized because of the large background of alpha 2-AR already in an intracellular membrane compartment. This intracellular pool of alpha 2c-AR is be further characterized below.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Distribution of the three alpha 2-AR subtypes in permeabilized HEK 293 cells at steady state and after agonist treatment. Agonist treatment, cell fixation, permeabilization, and staining are described in Experimental Procedures. A, At steady state, the alpha 2a-AR was primarily localized to the plasma membrane. B, After a 30-min incubation with 10 µM norepinephrine, the alpha 2a-AR did not redistribute. C, Similar to the alpha 2a, at steady state the alpha 2b-AR was primarily localized in the plasma membrane. D, However, 10 µM norepinephrine treatment caused the alpha 2b-AR to internalize into intracellular vesicles. E, In contrast to alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-AR sorting at steady state, the alpha 2c-AR was primarily localized in an intracellular compartment; the alpha 2c-AR appears as punctate intracellular staining. In nonpermeabilized cells at steady state, there is a relatively small amount of the alpha 2c-AR present in the plasma membrane (data not shown). F, A 30-min incubation with 10 µM norepinephrine did not cause notable redistribution of the alpha 2c-AR.

To further investigate differences in agonist-mediated internalization, 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2b-AR was coexpressed with a nontagged alpha 2a-AR, allowing us to examine differences in trafficking between these two subtypes in the same cell. The alpha 2a distribution was monitored with the polyclonal alpha 2a subtype-specific antibody, and the epitope-tagged alpha 2b-AR distribution was monitored with a monoclonal antibody to the 12CA5 epitope. At steady state, both receptors are found in the plasma membrane of the same cell (Fig. 2, A and B). After exposure to 10 µM norepinephrine for 30 min, only the alpha 2b-AR is internalized (Fig. 2, C and D). Similar treatment with 10 nM of the nonselective alpha 2 agonist dexmedetomidine also selectively internalized the alpha 2b-AR in cotransfected cells (Fig. 2, E and F). Additional agonist treatment paradigms with the alpha 2a-AR (30-min incubations with 10 µM epinephrine or 100 µM norepinephrine or <= 4-hr incubation with 10 µM norepinephrine) resulted in similar findings (data not shown).


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Receptor distribution after agonist treatment in HEK 293 cells coexpressing alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-ARs. The 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2b-AR was transiently transfected into a nonclonal HEK 293 cell line stably expressing the alpha 2a-AR. After treatment, cells were fixed and permeabilized as described in Experimental Procedures. At steady state, receptor was localized to the plasma membrane in cells expressing both (A) alpha 2a- and (B) alpha 2b-AR subtypes. C, After a 30-min incubation with 10 µM norepinephrine, the alpha 2a-AR did not redistribute. D, In contrast, agonist treatment caused the alpha 2b-AR coexpressed in the same cell to internalize into endosomes. Similar treatment with a 10 nM concentration of the nonselective alpha 2 agonist dexmedetomidine also selectively internalized the alpha 2b-AR (F), whereas no alpha 2a-AR internalization could be detected in the same cells (E).

The alpha 2b- and beta 2-ARs internalize by a similar mechanism. The mechanism of agonist-mediated internalization of the beta 2-AR has been well characterized. We therefore coexpressed the epitope-tagged alpha 2b-AR along with the beta 2-AR and examined the distribution of the two receptors after agonist treatment. At steady state, both receptors are on the plasma membrane (Fig. 3, A and B). Only the beta 2-AR is internalized in cells exposed to the beta -AR agonist isoproterenol (Fig. 3, C and D), and only the alpha 2b-AR is internalized in cells exposed to the alpha 2-AR agonist dexmedetomidine (Fig. 3, E and F). Using confocal microscopy, we demonstrated that both receptors are internalized by exposure to the common agonist norepinephrine and seem to reside in the same endocytic vesicles (Fig. 3, G and H).


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of subtype-selective and -nonselective agonist treatment of HEK 293 cells coexpressing alpha 2b- and beta 2-ARs. The 12CA5 epitope-tagged mouse alpha 2b-AR was transiently cotransfected with the human beta 2-AR in HEK 293 cells. At ~24 hr after transient transfection, cells were plated onto glass coverslips and grown for 2 days. For treatments, coverslips were incubated for 30 min in serum-free DMEM (control) or with the appropriate agonist in serum-free DMEM at 37° and 6% CO2. After fixation, cells were permeabilized before staining. A and B, At steady state, both receptors are localized in the plasma membrane. In cells coexpressing both ARs, 10 µM isoproterenol, a beta -selective agonist, induced internalization of beta 2-ARs (D), whereas alpha 2b-ARs did not redistribute (C). Similarly, 10 nM dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-selective agonist, promoted internalization of alpha 2b-ARs (E), whereas beta 2-ARs did not redistribute (F). When cells coexpressing both alpha 2b- and beta 2-ARs were treated with 10 µM norepinephrine, a common agonist for alpha 2- and beta 2-ARs, both receptors internalized into the same endocytic vesicles as observed by confocal microscopy (G and H, respectively).

The results of these immunocytochemical studies suggest that there is no internalization of the alpha 2a-AR after agonist treatment; however, it may not be possible to detect internalized receptor by fluorescence microscopy if it is not concentrated in endosomes. To investigate this possibility, we used an ELISA to monitor the loss of cell surface receptor rather than accumulation of intracellular receptor protein after agonist activation. Epitope-tagged alpha 2a-and alpha 2b-ARs were expressed in HEK 293 cells, and the density of receptors was monitored in nonpermeabilized cells with the 12CA5 antibody. At steady state, the cell surface expression of the alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-ARs was comparable. After treatment with norepinephrine for 30 min, there was a loss of 31 ± 2.4% (mean ± standard error) of alpha 2b-ARs and a loss of 7 ± 1.4% of alpha 2a-ARs. These results confirm the difference between alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-ARs; however, they suggest that there is a small but significant agonist-induced internalization of the alpha 2a-AR, possibly by a nonendosomal mechanism.

The alpha 2c-AR is found in the endoplasmic reticulum in Rat1 fibroblast cells. Although there is some plasma staining, the alpha 2c-AR seems to reside primarily in an intracellular compartment in HEK 293 cells (Fig. 1C). To further study this, we expressed the alpha 2a- and alpha 2c-ARs in a variety of cell lines. Similar to studies reported by Wozniak et al., (17) when expressed in a MDCK II cell line, the abundance of alpha 2c-AR was localized in an intracellular compartment, whereas the alpha 2a-AR was targeted to the basolateral plasma membrane (Fig. 4, A and B). When the 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR was transiently cotransfected in an HEK-293 cell line stably expressing wild-type alpha 2a-AR, the alpha 2c subtype was also localized to an intracellular compartment (Fig. 4, C and D). Coexpression of the alpha 2c did not alter the trafficking of the alpha 2a-AR subtype. We attempted to quantify the amount of 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR in the plasma membrane using the ELISA method discussed above. In contrast to the alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-AR subtypes, the signal generated from alpha 2c-AR transfected cells was not significantly different from that of untransfected cells. Thus, although we were able to detect a small amount of 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR in the plasma membrane of nonpermeabilized cells by the sensitive technique of immunofluorescence microscopy, the amount was too small to quantify by ELISA.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Distinct subcellular localization of alpha 2a- and alpha 2c-ARs at steady state. Immunolocalization of 12CA5 epitope-tagged (A) alpha 2a- and (B) alpha 2c-ARs in permeabilized MDCK cells is shown. A, At steady state in stably transfected MDCK cells, the alpha 2a-AR was localized to the basolateral plasma membrane. B, The alpha 2c-AR subtype was predominantly localized in an intracellular compartment when stably transfected in MDCK cells. Consistent with our findings of subcellular distribution in other cell lines, a relatively small amount of this receptor is localized in the basolateral plasma membrane (arrows). The 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR was also transiently cotransfected in HEK 293 cells stably expressing the wild-type alpha 2a-AR. C, Field of permeabilized cells viewed by confocal microscopy at 40× magnification. D, Confocal image at higher magnification (63×). At steady state, the alpha 2a-AR is predominantly sorted to the plasma membrane (stained red). Although some alpha 2c-AR is localized in the plasma membrane (seen as yellow from overlap of red and green), the abundance of this receptor is localized in an intracellular compartment (stained green).

The identity of the intracellular compartment containing the alpha 2c-ARs was difficult to assess in HEK 293 cells because of their relatively small size. To further investigate the subcellular distribution of alpha 2c-ARs, we studied Rat1 fibroblast and NRK cells, which have relatively large cytoplasms. The distribution of the receptor in Rat1 cells colocalizes with both BiP and mannosidase II (Fig. 5, A-D), suggesting that the alpha 2c-AR is found primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum and cis/medial Golgi. No overlap was observed with markers for trans-Golgi network (M6PR), endosomes (M6PR), or lysosomes (lgp120) (Fig. 5, E-H). We observed a similar distribution of the alpha 2c-AR in NRK cells (data not shown).


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Immunocytochemical identification of the subcellular compartment containing alpha 2c-ARs. Colocalization studies using antibodies that specifically stain various subcellular compartments and antibodies specific for the wild-type (polyclonal) or 12CA5 (monoclonal) epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR have allowed identification of the distribution of this receptor in permeabilized Rat1 fibroblast cells. A, Cell is stained for the 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR. B, Same cell is costained for BiP, which specifically labels the endoplasmic reticulum. There is considerable overlap between these two antibodies, indicating that a significant proportion of the alpha 2c-AR is localized to this organelle. Similarly, the wild-type alpha 2c-AR (C) colocalizes with mannosidase II (Mann. II), a marker for cis/medial Golgi (D). Conversely, the 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR (E) does not overlap with M6PR, which labels the trans-Golgi network and endosomes (F). There also is no significant colocalization between the wild-type alpha 2c-AR (G) and lgp120, a lysosomal marker (H).

The finding that a large proportion of cellular alpha 2c-AR resides in the endoplasmic reticulum suggests several possibilities. This receptor may be improperly processed, or the cell may lack an important chaperone protein and therefore the receptor is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. It is also possible that the receptor is processed slowly and undergoes a relatively rapid turnover at the plasma membrane. However, similar half-lives have been reported for all three alpha 2-AR subtypes in MDCK cells (17). Finally, it is possible that the receptor is cycling between the plasma membrane and cytosolic pool. To examine these possibilities, we constructed a modified form of the alpha 2c-AR that would allow us to identify receptor that has been delivered to the plasma membrane. Fig. 6 shows the amino-terminal sequence of the modified alpha 2c-AR. An M1 flag epitope and a thrombin cleavage site were added to the amino terminus. Cleavage of the receptor by thrombin present in the media results in loss of the flag epitope (which can be recognized by the commercially available M1 monoclonal antibody), whereas the hirudin binding domain of the thrombin cleavage site remains and can be recognized by a polyclonal antibody. Therefore, receptors that are on the plasma membrane are susceptible to thrombin cleavage. These thrombin-cleaved receptors will stain only with the polyclonal antibody to the hirudin epitope, not with the M1 flag antibody.

Fig. 7 demonstrates that the amino-terminal thrombin epitope does not effect the distribution of the alpha 2c-AR. In permeabilized cells, most of the alpha 2c-AR is found in an intracellular compartment (Fig. 7, E-H); however, cell surface expression can be demonstrated in nonpermeabilized cells (Fig. 7, A-D). Exposure of the cell to thrombin results in loss of cell surface receptor staining by the M1 flag antibody (Fig. 7, C and G); however, the receptor is still recognized by the antibody to the hirudin epitope (Fig. 7, D and H). To investigate the turnover of alpha 2c-AR, cells were exposed to cycloheximide to block protein synthesis and incubated in the presence of epinephrine and thrombin for 4 hr (Fig. 8, A-F). Movement of receptor from the intracellular pool to the cell surface would result in cleavage by thrombin and a loss of staining by M1 flag antibody. If these receptors were then internalized and recycled through the endoplasmic reticulum or distributed to lysosomes, they would be recognized by staining with the polyclonal antibody to the hirudin epitope but not the M1 flag antibody. As seen in Fig. 8, there is no significant loss of intracellular staining by the M1 antibody, indicating that the intracellular pool of receptor is stable. Moreover, using the cleavable thrombin/flag epitope, we were able to determine that a small amount of alpha 2c-AR was internalized from the plasma membrane with agonist treatment (Fig. 8, E and F). This internalized receptor stains with the hirudin antibody but not the M1 antibody (Fig. 8, E and F, arrows).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Thrombin cleavage of the amino-terminal flag epitope distinguishes intracellular alpha 2c-AR from that delivered to the plasma membrane. For these experiments, NRK cells were studied because they are large and have a large ratio of cytoplasm to nucleus, which enabled better visualization of intracellular receptor compared with similar studies in HEK-293 cells. Intact NRK cells transfected with the thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR were incubated in DMEM (Control) or 5 nM thrombin in DMEM for 30 min. After fixation, immunocytochemical staining was performed using both nonpermeabilizing conditions (A-D) or after cellular permeabilization with 0.2% nonionic detergent (E-H). In nonpermeabilized stained control cells, (A) flag epitope and (B) hirudin epitope colocalized to the plasma membrane. Thrombin treatment caused a complete loss of flag staining in the plasma membrane (C), whereas hirudin staining was retained (D). In control cells that were permeabilized for immunocytochemical staining after fixation, (E) flag epitope and (F) hirudin epitope were colocalized. Thrombin treatment cleaved off the flag epitope of receptor present in the plasma membrane (G, arrow), whereas the intracellular flag epitope remained intact (G). Costaining with hirudin in thrombin-treated cells identifies flag-cleaved receptor in the plasma membrane (H, arrow).


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Agonist treatment does not induce redistribution of the intracellular pool of thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2c-ARs. To investigate whether agonist treatment could induce a shift in the subcellular localization of alpha 2c-ARs, intact NRK cells transfected with amino terminal thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2c-ARs were studied. Incubation with 10 µM cycloheximide did not result in an observable loss of alpha 2c-AR from the plasma membrane or shift in the intracellular receptor pool to the plasma membrane over a 4-hr treatment (A and B). Simultaneous 4-hr incubations with 10 µM cycloheximide and 5 nM thrombin showed a loss of receptor flag staining in the plasma membrane (C, arrow), whereas hirudin staining remained intact (D, arrow). There was no reduction of the intracellular pool of alpha 2c (staining with both antibodies). Finally, the effect of agonist on the subcellular trafficking of thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2c-AR was studied. Concurrent 4-hr incubations with 10 µM cycloheximide, 5 nM thrombin, and 10 µM epinephrine did not produce any observable shift in the intracellular pool of alpha 2c-AR (E and F), indicating that the intracellular pool of alpha 2c-AR is relatively stable. Moreover, the cleavable thrombin/flag epitope on the amino terminus of the alpha 2c-AR allowed us to identify that some receptor is internalized with agonist treatment. In the presence of thrombin, agonist-promoted receptor internalization from the plasma membrane resulted in a relatively small population of intracellular vesicles that stained only for the hirudin epitope (F, arrow), not the flag epitope (E, arrow).

In a comparable experiment, the alpha 2a-AR was similarly tagged with the same thrombin-cleavable epitope (Fig. 9). At steady state, most of the receptor is susceptible to cleavage with thrombin, indicating that the majority of alpha 2a-AR is localized in the plasma membrane (Fig. 9, C and D). A small amount of intracellular receptor (M1 flag antibody staining) is observed before but not after exposure to cycloheximide and thrombin for 4 hr (Fig. 9, E and F). This indicates that within 4 hr, all of the alpha 2a-AR in the biosynthetic pathway has been processed and inserted in the plasma membrane.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Trafficking studies of the amino-terminal thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2a-AR indicates that within 4-hr, all receptor has been processed and inserted into the plasma membrane. Intact NRK cells transfected with the thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2a-AR were grown on coverslips and incubated in (A and B, Control) DMEM, (C and D) 5 nM thrombin in DMEM for 5 min, or (E and F) 5 nM thrombin, 10 µM cycloheximide, and 10 µM norepinephrine for 4 hr. After fixation, immunocytochemical staining was performed after cellular permeabilization as described in Experimental Procedures. Similar to wild-type or 12CA5 epitope-tagged alpha 2a-ARs, at steady state, thrombin/flag epitope-tagged receptor is primarily localized to the plasma membrane (A and B). Thrombin treatment caused a complete loss of flag staining in the plasma membrane (D), whereas hirudin staining was retained (C). In cells that have been treated with thrombin, cycloheximide, and norepinephrine for 4 hr, there is a complete loss of flag staining (F), whereas hirudin staining in the plasma membrane is retained (E).

Agonist-promoted accumulation of alpha 2c-AR in endosomes may not be as pronounced as that observed for the alpha 2b-AR because of the large amount of alpha 2c-AR in the intracellular compartment at steady state and the comparatively small amount of alpha 2c-AR in the plasma membrane (Fig. 8F). A more sensitive technique for identifying agonist-induced receptor internalization is shown in Fig. 10. Living, nonpermeabilized cells expressing M1 flag-tagged alpha 2c-AR are first labeled with M1 flag monoclonal antibody and then washed and incubated in the presence or absence of agonist for 30 min. Cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with secondary antibody. This approach allowed us to selectively examine only alpha 2c-ARs that are in the plasma membrane. No internalization was detected in control cells (Fig. 10A); however, after agonist treatment, receptor was observed in an intracellular compartment (Fig. 10C, arrow). The intracellular receptor surrounds the nucleus, creating a nuclear shadow in agonist-treated cells (Fig. 10C), whereas no nuclear shadow is observed in control cells (Fig. 10A). The internalized alpha 2c-AR colocalized with the M6PR that is present in the trans-Golgi network and endosomes (Fig. 10D).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Immunocytochemical identification of agonist-induced redistribution of alpha 2c-ARs into endosomes. Thrombin/flag epitope-tagged alpha 2c-ARs were stably expressed in NRK cells and grown on coverslips as described in Experimental Procedures. Coverslips were incubated with monoclonal flag antibody at 4° for 60 min, labeling epitope-tagged alpha 2c-ARs present on the cell surface. After gentle washing, coverslips were returned to 37° with 6% CO2 and incubated in serum-free DMEM in the presence or absence of agonist (10 µM epinephrine) for 30 min. After this 30-min incubation, cells were fixed in 4% PFA, permeabilized, and stained as described. A and C, alpha 2c-AR distribution in control and agonist-treated cells, respectively. After fixation and permeabilization, the polyclonal antibody to M6PR was used to label the trans-Golgi network and endosomes in (B) control and (D) agonist-treated cells. C, Some alpha 2c-AR has internalized with agonist treatment and is localized in the perinuclear region (arrow). This area overlaps with that labeled in D with the M6PR antibody (arrow).

    Discussion
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

In this study, we report differences in steady state targeting and agonist-induced internalization of the three alpha 2-AR subtypes. The alpha 2b-AR behaves more like the beta 2-AR than the alpha 2a-AR. This is particularly interesting in light of the high degree of identity shared by alpha 2a and alpha 2b (55%, alpha 2a versus alpha 2b; 21%, beta 2 versus alpha 2b). Moreover, we extend previous observations regarding the intracellular distribution of the alpha 2c-AR subtype. The roles of intracellular targeting and trafficking in signal transduction are not well understood; however, agonist-induced internalization has been shown to play a role in receptor regulation. Studies have implicated agonist-induced internalization in the process of resensitization. Blocking internalization by selective receptor mutations or treatment of cells with concanavalin A or sucrose prevents dephosphorylation of the receptor (22). Recent studies have suggested that binding of beta -arrestin to the beta 2-AR after G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation is necessary for internalization (23). Of interest, the alpha 2a-AR has been shown to undergo phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinase (14, 15). The inefficient agonist-induced internalization in the alpha 2a-AR may suggest that this receptor does not bind to beta -arrestin. These results may also suggest that the alpha 2a-AR is tethered to the plasma membrane and is prevented from undergoing internalization even when phosphorylated and bound to beta -arrestin. This may lead to a difference in the rate of resensitization and therefore account for the more extensive desensitization observed for the alpha 2a-AR.

We observed a small amount of agonist-induced internalization of alpha 2a using a sensitive ELISA technique for quantitative changes in cell surface density of receptor antigen. However, there was no significant accumulation of receptor in endosomes that could be detected by immunocytochemistry. This suggests that the small amount of alpha 2a internalization may be occurring by a different mechanism than that used for internalization of alpha 2b- and beta 2-ARs. The inefficient agonist-induced internalization of alpha 2a relative to alpha 2b is in contrast to previous reports (12, 24); Eason et al. found that a 30-min exposure to agonist resulted in 35% sequestration of the alpha 2b-AR and 26% sequestration in the alpha 2a-AR. In those studies, CHO cells were used, and internalization was assayed by ligand binding techniques that used hydrophilic agonists to distinguish between cell surface and intracellular receptor. Several possibilities might account for these different results. First, CHO cells may express other proteins that are critical for agonist-induced sequestration in the alpha 2a-AR. Although alpha 2b- and beta 2-ARs undergo agonist-promoted receptor internalization in HEK 293 cells, it is possible that this cell line lacks a component necessary for sequestration of alpha 2a-ARs that is present in CHO cells. Another possible explanation is that different methods were used to assess sequestration in the two studies. In the current study, we used immunocytochemical methods to examine receptor internalization. These techniques are not influenced by the state of receptor/G protein coupling. This may not be the case when alpha 2-AR internalization is examined by using a hydrophilic agonist to quantify cell surface receptor density. It is possible that agonist treatment could reduce agonist binding of desensitized plasma membrane alpha 2a-AR even in the absence of receptor internalization.

The physiological or functional significance of the large intracellular pool of the alpha 2c-AR subtype is not known at this time. Both we and others have reported this unique intracellular distribution in a variety of cell lines, including COS-7, HEK 293, MDCK II, Rat1 fibroblasts, and NRK (16, 17). Moreover, this subcellular distribution is not a species-specific idiosyncrasy to the mouse alpha 2c-AR because the wild-type human receptor shows similar intracellular localization when transfected in COS-7 or HEK-293 cells (data not shown). Wozniak and Limbird (17) have shown that in MDCK II cells, this distribution is independent of receptor expression levels; consistent with our findings that a relatively small proportion of the alpha 2c-AR is targeted to the plasma membrane (Fig. 4, B-D), the authors showed that this receptor is targeted directly to the basolateral membrane of MDCK II cells. It is also noteworthy that when alpha 2c- and alpha 2a-ARs are coexpressed in the same cell, these differences in receptor sorting are maintained (Fig. 4, C and D). The alpha 2c-AR may require a specific chaperone protein for efficient targeting to the plasma membrane, or it may require a specific protein that anchors the receptor to the cytoskeleton. In the latter case, one would expect the receptor to traffic normally to the plasma membrane but not be retained. However, this mechanism is not consistent with the results of experiments using the thrombin/flag epitope-tagged receptor (Fig. 8) that demonstrate no detectable cycling of receptor between intracellular compartment and the plasma membrane.

We noted that plasma membrane alpha 2c-AR was more easily visualized in NRK cells (Figs. 7, 8, and 10) than in HEK 293 cells. It may be that NRK cells are somewhat better in translocating the alpha 2c-AR to the plasma membrane than are HEK 293 cells; however, this may also be due to the fact that the NRK cells are larger and very flat, permitting better visualization of a larger amount of plasma membrane in a single plane of focus.

We were unable to detect agonist-induced internalization of the alpha 2c-AR using conventional immunocytochemical techniques (Fig. 1). This is in part due to the large preexisting pool of intracellular alpha 2c-AR. However, using a cleavable thrombin/flag epitope on the amino terminus of the alpha 2c-AR allowed us to identify that some receptor is internalized with prolonged agonist treatment (Fig. 8, E and F). This was confirmed by prelabeling the amino-terminal M1 flag epitope of plasma membrane alpha 2c-AR with antibody before agonist treatment (Fig. 10).

The differences in intracellular trafficking observed for the alpha 2-AR subtypes is somewhat unexpected considering the high degree of amino acid identity and the functional similarity with respect to ligand-binding properties and G protein coupling. The functional significance of differences in receptor trafficking is unknown but may be more important in vivo in highly differentiated cells. It has been proposed that receptor subtypes may be targeted to specific plasma membrane microdomains in which receptors are found in close proximity with specific G proteins and effector enzymes (25). Thus, unique trafficking behavior of receptors may enable receptors to couple to specific effector systems.

Summary. We reported that in several cell lines, the three alpha 2-ARs display unique patterns of subcellular distribution and sorting. At steady state, the alpha 2a- and alpha 2b-AR subtypes are localized in the plasma membrane. Agonist treatment induces internalization of the alpha 2b-AR into endosomes, presumably using the same cellular machinery as the beta 2-AR, whereas no accumulation of alpha 2a-AR in endosomes could be detected after agonist stimulation. In contrast, at steady state the alpha 2c-AR is targeted to the plasma membrane; however, a significant proportion of this receptor is localized in an intracellular pool that has not yet been delivered to the plasma membrane. Through colocalization studies, we determined that the intracellular pool of alpha 2c-ARs is predominantly localized in the endoplasmic reticulum and cis/medial Golgi. Agonist treatment of the alpha 2c-AR results in some receptor internalization from the plasma membrane. The functional significance of the observed differences in subcellular sorting of the three relatively highly homologous alpha 2-ARs remains to be established.

    Footnotes

Received October 28, 1996; Accepted February 10, 1997

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Brian K. Kobilka, B159 Beckman Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: kobilka{at}cmgm.stanford.edu

    Abbreviations

AR, adrenergic receptor; HEK, human embryonic kidney; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; M6PR, mannose-6-phosphate receptor; BSA, bovine serum albumin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.

    References
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

1. Bylund, D. B. Subtypes of alpha 2-adrenoceptors. pharmacological and molecular biological evidence converge. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.  9:356-361 (1988)[Medline].
2. Bylund, D. B., P. C. Ray, and T. J. Murphy. alpha -2A and alpha -2B adrenergic receptor subtypes: antagonist binding in tissues and cell lines containing only one subtype. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.  245:600-607 (1988)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Kurose, H., J. W. Regan, M. G. Caron, and R. J. Lefkowitz. Functional interactions of recombinant alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes and G proteins in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry  30:3335-3341 (1991)[Medline].
4. Coupry, I., E. Duzic, and S. M. Lanier. Factors determining the specificity of signal transduction by guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors. II. Preferential coupling of the alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor to the guanine nucleotide-binding protein, Go. J. Biol. Chem.  267:9852-9857 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Duzic, E., I. Coupry, S. Downing, and S. M. Lanier. Factors determining the specificity of signal transduction by guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors. I. Coupling of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes to distinct G-proteins. J. Biol. Chem.  267:9844-9851 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Eason, M. G., H. Kurose, B. D. Holt, J. R. Raymond, and S. B. Liggett. Simultaneous coupling of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors to two G-proteins with opposing effects: subtype-selective coupling of alpha 2C10, alpha 2C4, and alpha 2C2 adrenergic receptors to Gi and Gs. J. Biol. Chem.  267:15795-15801 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Eason, M. G., M. T. Jacinto, and S. B. Liggett. Contribution of ligand structure to activation of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtype coupling to Gs. Mol. Pharmacol.  45:696-702 (1994)[Abstract].
8. Jansson, C. C., A. Marjamaki, K. Luomala, J. M. Savola, M. Scheinin, and K. E. Akerman. Coupling of human alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes to regulation of cAMP production in transfected S115 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol.  266:165-174 (1994)[Medline].
9. Duzic, E. and S. M. Lanier. Factors determining the specificity of signal transduction by guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors. III. Coupling of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes in a cell type-specific manner. J. Biol. Chem.  267:24045-24052 (1992)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Cotecchia, S., B. K. Kobilka, K. W. Daniel, R. D. Nolan, E. Y. Lapetina, M. G. Caron, R. J. Lefkowitz, and J. W. Regan. Multiple second messenger pathways of alpha -adrenergic receptor subtypes expressed in eukaryotic cells. J. Biol. Chem.  265:63-69 (1990)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Surprenant, A., D. A. Horstman, H. Akbarali, and L. E. Limbird. A point mutation of