|
|
|
|
Subunit Are Crucial for
Benzodiazepine Binding and Allosteric Modulation of
-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida 33612 (J.A.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 (A.B.-K.), and Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 (D.S.W.)
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Benzodiazepines (BZs) exert their therapeutic effects in the mammalian
central nervous system at least in part by modulating the activation of
-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-activated chloride channels. To gain
further insight into the mechanism of action of BZs on GABA receptors,
we have been investigating structural determinants required for the
actions of the BZ diazepam (dzp) on recombinant
1
2
2
GABAA receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to
introduce point mutations into the
1 and
2 GABAA receptor subunits. Wild-type and mutant GABAA receptors
were then expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes or human
embryonic kidney 293 (HEK 293) cells and studied using two-electrode
voltage-clamp and ligand-binding techniques. With this approach, we
identified two tyrosine residues on the
1 subunit (Tyr159 and
Tyr209) that when mutated to serine, dramatically impaired modulation
by dzp. The Y209S substitution resulted in a >7-fold increase in the
EC50 for dzp, and the Y159S substitution nearly abolished
dzp-mediated potentiation. Both of these mutations abolished binding of
the high affinity BZ receptor antagonist [3H]Ro 15-1788
to GABAA receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells. These tyrosine residues correspond to two tyrosines of the
2 subunit (Tyr157 and Tyr205) previously postulated to form part of the GABA-binding site. Mutation of the corresponding tyrosine residues on
the
2 subunit produced only a slight increase in the
EC50 for dzp (~2-fold) with no significant effect on the
binding affinity of [3H]Ro 15-1788. These data suggest
that Tyr159 and Tyr209 of the
1 subunit may be components of the
BZ-binding site on
1
2
2 GABAA receptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BZs are frequently prescribed as anxiolytics, sedatives, anticonvulsants, and muscle relaxants (1-3). It is now generally accepted that these compounds exert their therapeutic effects, at least partly, by interacting with GABAA receptors in the brain (2-8). Thus, a substantial effort has been directed at understanding the molecular mechanism by which BZs modulate GABAA receptor function (9-12).
Molecular cloning studies (13-15) have revealed multiple classes and
isoforms of GABAA receptor subunits in the mammalian brain (
1-6,
1-4,
1-3,
). This diversity of
,
, and
subunits allows the expression of a vast number of structurally unique GABAA receptor subtypes with distinct pharmacologies.
Studies using exogenous expression, photoaffinity labeling, chimeric
subunits, and site-directed mutagenesis have indicated that the
subunit contributes a major component of the BZ-binding site and,
depending on the subtype, can confer either BZ1 or BZ2 pharmacology on
the GABAA receptor (16-23). In particular, a histidine
residue at position 101 (22) and a glycine residue at position 200 (21)
have been implicated in BZ binding to the GABA receptor complex (Fig.
1).
|
Although the
subunit seems to form part of the BZ-binding site, the
presence of a
subunit is essential for the normal modulatory
actions of BZs on GABAA receptors (19, 24, 25; although see
Ref. 26). The
subunit is photoaffinity labeled by
[3H]flunitrazepam (27), suggesting that it may also
contribute part of the BZ-binding site. Site-directed mutagenesis
studies have identified a threonine residue at position 142 of the
human
2 subunit (Fig. 1) implicated in the efficacy of BZ ligands
(28).
We previously identified two tyrosines at position 157 and 205 of the
2 subunit (Fig. 1) that when mutated, dramatically impaired
GABA-mediated activation of the
1
2
2 GABAA
receptor/pore complex (29). These two tyrosine residues are conserved
in all
,
, and
subunit isoforms. Mutation of the homologous
tyrosines in the
1 or
2 subunits did not alter GABA-dependent
activation of the
1
2
2 GABAA receptor (29). Here,
we demonstrate that mutagenesis of these two tyrosines in the
1
(
1Y159S and
1Y209S) subunit, but not in the
2 subunit
(
2Y172S and
2Y220S), has profound effects on BZ binding and
modulation of GABA-activated currents, suggesting these amino acids may
be components of the BZ-binding site.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro
transcription.
Rat
1,
2, and
2 cDNAs were cloned into the
pSELECT vector (Promega, Madison, WI), and oligonucleotide-mediated
site-directed mutagenesis was achieved with the Altered Sites Kit
(Promega) as previously described (30). Successful mutagenesis was
verified by sequencing.
Oocyte isolation and cRNA injection. Xenopus laevis (Xenopus I, Ann Arbor, MI) were anesthetized by hypothermia, and oocytes were surgically removed from the frog and placed in a solution that consisted of 82.5 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin, pH 7.5. Oocytes were dispersed in this same solution minus Ca2+ and plus 0.3% Collagenase A (Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis IN). After isolation, the oocytes were thoroughly rinsed, and stage VI oocytes were separated and maintained overnight at 18°.
Micropipettes for injection of cRNA were pulled on a Sutter P87 horizontal puller, and the tips were cut off with microscissors. cRNAs for the desired subunit combinations were mixed (equimolar ratios), diluted 5-30-fold with diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water, and drawn up into the micropipette with negative pressure. The cRNA was injected into the oocytes by applying positive pressure using a Picospritzer II (General Valve Corporation, Fairfield, NJ). To ensure that equal concentrations of cRNA per construct were injected, in vitro synthesized cRNA, at different set dilutions, were electrophoresed onto a 1% formaldehyde-containing agarose gel. The amount of cRNA was judged and matched by interpolation of lanes containing different dilutions of the corresponding cRNA.Recording. At 1-3 days after injection, oocytes were placed onto a 300-µm nylon mesh suspended in a small volume chamber (<100 µl). The oocytes were continuously perfused and briefly switched to the test solution containing GABA (3 µM) or GABA plus dzp. The stock dzp (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) solution was made in PEG-300 or ethanol. No differences were observed between the two vehicles.
Recording microelectrodes were fabricated with a P87 Sutter horizontal puller and filled with 3 M KCl. The electrodes had resistances of 1-3 M
. Standard two-electrode voltage-clamp
techniques were used to record currents in response to application of
agonist. In all cases, the membrane potential was clamped to
70 mV.
Data were played out on a Gould EasyGraf chart recorder during the experiment and recorded on tape for off-line analysis.
Data analysis. The fractional potentiation (FP) was calculated for each dzp concentration as follows:
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
Transfection of mammalian cells.
Cloned cDNAs encoding the
rat wild-type or mutated subunits were subcloned into the polylinker
site of appropriate expression vectors by standard recombinant DNA
techniques (wild-type
1,
2, and
2: pCDM8, pRK5, and pRc/CMV,
respectively; mutant subunits: pRK7). Expression plasmid DNA was
prepared by CsCl gradient centrifugation. HEK 293 cells were
transfected using calcium phosphate precipitation with the combinations
of plasmid DNAs (20 µg/10-cm plate) indicated in the text. After 48 hr, cells were harvested, pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 × g, and frozen at
70°.
Binding assay. Cell membrane pellets were washed three times by homogenization in 20 volumes of ice-cold buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.2), centrifuged, and then homogenized in a mixture of 10 mM potassium phosphate and 100 mM potassium chloride, pH 7.2. Incubations contained 200-µl aliquots of membrane suspension; 25 µl of [3H]Ro 15-1788 (83.7 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear Research Products, Boston, MA) or [3H]muscimol (16 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). [3H]Ro 15-1788 was used at concentrations of 0.1-10 nM, and [3H]muscimol was used at concentrations of 1.5-50 nM. After incubation for 60 min at 4°, the membranes were collected by rapid filtration on Whatman GF/C filters and immediately washed two times with 5 ml of ice-cold buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM potassium chloride, pH 7.2). Radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. Specific binding was defined as the difference between total binding and nonspecific binding in the presence of clonazepam or GABA. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA Protein Assay (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dzp-mediated modulation of wild-type
1
2
2
receptors.
cRNA encoding rat wild-type
1,
2, and
2
subunits were coinjected into X. laevis oocytes, and 1-2
days later, GABA-activated currents were examined using the
two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. The traces in Fig.
2A are GABA-activated currents (3 µM GABA) from oocytes expressing wild-type
1
2
2 GABAA
receptors in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of
the BZ dzp. The dzp produced a concentration-dependent enhancement in
the amplitude of the GABA-evoked currents. The fractional potentiation of the current is plotted as a function of dzp concentration in Fig.
2B. Note that the dose-response relationship for dzp-mediated modulation has three components (also obvious in the current traces of
Fig. 2A); a potentiation that seems to plateau around 1 µM, a depression apparent at 1- 20 µM dzp,
and a further potentiation at dzp concentrations of > 20 µM.
|
1 µM
dzp, where the potentiation seemed to plateau. This fit (extrapolated as a dashed line) yielded an EC50 value of
64.8 ± 3.7 nM, a Hill coefficient of 1.16 ± 0.04, and a fractional potentiation of 2.57 ± 0.02 (Table
1). Although this potentiation seemed to saturate around
1 µM dzp, this may be in part due to the depression that is evident in this concentration range. Thus, the EC50 and
fractional potentiation may be underestimated. The fractional
potentiation at 200 µM dzp was 4.49 ± 0.60, which
represents an additional 1.9-fold increase in the GABA-activated
current above that seen at lower dzp concentrations. We examined these
higher dzp concentrations of the wild-type receptor because mutations
that impair the dzp sensitivity might shift the dose-response
relationship to the right.
|
Mutations in conserved domains of the
1 subunit.
The
tyrosine at position 159 of the
1 subunit (Fig. 1) was mutated to
serine (
1Y159S) and coexpressed with wild-type
2 and
2
subunits. The traces in Fig. 3A are GABA-activated
currents (3 µM GABA) in the absence or presence of
increasing concentrations of dzp for the
1Y159S
2
2 receptor.
Note the dramatic decrease in potentiation at lower dzp concentrations
compared with that of the wild-type receptor (Fig. 2A). This mutation
did not impair activation by GABA (
1
2
2: EC50 = 45.8 ± 3.6 µM, Hill coefficient = 1.57 ± 0.09, Imax = 381 ± 508 nA;
1Y159S
2
2:
EC50 = 44.9 ± 4.5 µM, Hill
coefficient = 1.62 ± 0.18, Imax = 586 ± 405 nA; see Ref. 29). Fig. 3B plots the potentiation of GABA-activated
currents for
1Y159S
2
2 (open symbols) as a function
of dzp concentration. For comparison, the potentiation of the wild-type
1
2
2 receptor is also plotted (filled symbols). The
1Y159S substitution nearly abolished the dzp-mediated potentiation
at < 1 µM, and therefore the Hill equation could
not be reliably fitted to these data points. In contrast, the
potentiation at > 20 µM greatly exceeded that of
the wild-type receptor. One possible interpretation of the increased
potentiation at high dzp concentrations is that the
1Y159S mutation
impaired dzp sensitivity of the lower component, thereby shifting it to
the right. Thus, this lower component might now overlap with the upper
component, yielding the increased potentiation at high dzp
concentrations (fractional potentiation of 7.5 compared with 4.4).
Based on these data, however, we cannot rule out the possibility that
the
1Y159S mutation enhanced the efficacy of the actions of dzp at
these higher concentrations.
|
1 subunit
(Fig. 1), was mutated to serine, and the resulting
1Y209S was coexpressed with wild-type
2 and
2
subunits. Similar to the tyrosine at position 159, mutation of the
tyrosine at position 209 decreased the potentiation by dzp compared
with that of the wild-type receptor. This mutation did not affect the
EC50 or Imax values for GABA-mediated
activation (
1
2
2: EC50 = 45.8 ± 3.6 µM, Imax = 381 ± 508 nA;
1Y209S
2
2: EC50 = 38.2 ± 12.2 µM, Imax = 627 ± 379; see Ref. 29),
although there was a slight but significant (p = 0.021) decrease in the Hill coefficient (
1
2
2: Hill
coefficient = 1.57 ± 0.09;
1Y209S
2
2: Hill
coefficient = 1.38 ± 0.10; see Ref. 29). Fig. 3C plots the
potentiation of GABA-activated currents (3 µM GABA) for
1Y209S
2
2 (open symbols) as a function of dzp concentration. Fitting a Hill equation to the data points at
10 µM diazepam yielded an EC50 value of 463 ± 51.2 nM, a Hill coefficient of 1.03 ± 0.08, and a
fractional potentiation of 1.54 ± 0.11 (Table 1). Thus, in
comparison with the wild-type receptor, substitution of the tyrosine at
position 209 imparted a 7.1-fold increase in the EC50 value
for dzp and a 1.7-fold reduction in the maximal potentiation.
Impaired dzp sensitivity is not due to the absence of the
subunit.
Evidence suggests the
subunit contributes a major
component of the BZ-binding site (21, 22, 31). Thus, we considered the
possibility that the tyrosine substitutions impair the assembly of the
mutant
subunit, resulting in a preponderance of
2
2 GABAA receptors that are less affected by dzp. It has
previously been shown that
2
2 GABAA receptors are dzp
sensitive (32-34) ,and Fig. 4 demonstrates that the dzp
sensitivity of
2
2 GABA receptors is similar to that of
1
2
2 GABA receptors (parameters provided in Table 1). These
data suggest that the impairment of dzp-mediated modulation with the
1Y159S and
1Y209S substitutions (Figs. 2 and 3) cannot be
accounted for by a mutation-induced impairment in the assembly of the
subunit.
|
More conservative substitutions at positions 159 and 209.
To
gain insight into the structural requirements at positions 159 and 209, more conservative substitutions with respect to the amino acid size and
aromatic ring were introduced at these positions (i.e.,
1Y159F and
1Y209F). Fitting the Hill equation to dose-response relationships
(not shown) from the
1Y159F
2
2 receptors (
1 µM
dzp) yielded an EC50 value of 118.2 ± 39.4 nM, a Hill coefficient of 1.09 ± 0.06, and a
fractional potentiation of 2.3 ± 0.03 (Table 1). Fitting the Hill
equation to dose-response relationships (not shown) from the
1Y209F
2
2 receptors (
1 µM dzp) yielded an
EC50 value of 140.9 ± 3.2 nM, a Hill
coefficient of 1.31 ± 0.02, and a fractional potentiation of
2.26 ± 0.24 (Table 1). Thus, in comparison with the serine
substitution, the more conservative phenylalanine substitution at these
two positions produced a moderate rightward shift in the dose-response
relationship for dzp.
Mutation of other tyrosines in the vicinity of
1Tyr159.
To
test the relative importance of these two conserved tyrosines of the
1 subunit in dzp-mediated potentiation of the GABA-activated currents, we mutated other tyrosine residues in the vicinity of
1Tyr159 (positions 161 and 168). Substitution of the tyrosine at
position 161 (
1Y161S) with serine (just two amino acids away from
the crucial
1Tyr159) had no effect on the EC50 value for dzp (Table 1), although there was a slight decrease in the maximal potentiation of the initial component. Similar to
Y161S,
substitution of the tyrosine at position 168 with serine (
1Y168S)
did not alter the EC50 value for dzp-mediated potentiation
(Table 1). The
1Y168S mutation also induced a slight depression in
the maximal potentiation at low dzp concentrations.
Mutation of a conserved threonine at position 162.
Previous
studies have shown that the threonine at position 160 of the
2
subunit plays a crucial role in GABA-mediated activation (29). We
mutated the homologous threonine in the
1 subunit (T162A) to
investigate its potential role in dzp-mediated modulation of the GABA
current.
1T162A
2
2 mutant receptors demonstrated a similar
sensitivity to dzp as that of the wild-type receptor (Table 1).
Mutations in conserved domains of the
2 subunit.
The
and
subunit tyrosines crucial for dzp-dependent potentiation (Figs.
2 and 3) and GABA-mediated activation (29) of the GABAA
receptor, respectively, are also conserved in the
2 subunit (Fig. 1;
2Tyr172 and
2Tyr220). Because the
2 subunit is
essential for the modulatory effects of BZs (19), we examined the
potential role of these two
2 subunit tyrosines in the actions of
dzp.
1
2
2Y172S and
1
2
2Y220S (shaded circles) GABAA
receptors, respectively. Both substitutions produced a ~2-fold
increase in the EC50 value of the initial component for dzp
(i.e., 118.5 ± 12.0 and 129.7 ± 5.3 nM for
Y172S and Y220S, respectively). These are moderate shifts in comparison
with those observed with mutation of the corresponding tyrosines of the
1 subunit. These two substitutions did not affect the sensitivity to
activation by GABA (
1
2
2: EC50 = 45.8 ± 3.6 µM, Hill coefficient = 1.57 ± 0.09, Imax = 381 ± 508 nA;
1
2
2Y172S:
EC50 = 40.4 ± 5.0 µM, Hill
coefficient = 1.49 ± 0.14, Imax = 453 ± 492 nA;
1
2
2Y220S: EC50 = 38.4 ± 6.2 µM, Hill coefficient = 1.43 ± 0.10, Imax = 495 ± 514 nA; see Ref. 29).
|
1 subunit,
the
2 subunit can assume the role of the
1 subunit role in dzp
sensitivity. Because the crucial tyrosines are conserved in the
2
subunit, we coexpressed the
2 subunit along with these mutant
2
subunits (
2Y172S and
2Y220S) to test their potential role in
dzp-mediated potentiation of the
2
2 receptor. Fig.
6 shows the wild-type
2
2 dose-response
relationship for dzp-mediated potentiation of the GABA-activated
current (already presented in Fig. 4). The potentiation of
GABA-activated currents from
2
2Y172S (
) and
2
2Y220S
(
) by 10, 100, and 1000 nM dzp is also plotted. These
nonconservative substitutions did not impair dzp sensitivity, suggesting that in the absence of the
1 subunit, these conserved
2 subunit tyrosines do not assume the same role as their
1
subunit counterparts.
|
Effects of tyrosine mutations on BZ binding.
The observed
impairment of the sensitivity of the GABAA receptor to dzp
imparted by the
1Y159S and
1Y209S mutations (Figs. 1 and 2) could
be accounted for by two mechanisms: (a) impairment of dzp binding or
(b) impairment of the coupling of dzp binding to receptor/channel
modulation. In an effort to distinguish between these two
possibilities, we compared the binding of the high affinity BZ
antagonist Ro 15-1788 to wild-type and mutant receptors. Fig. 7 (
) is a representative Scatchard plot of
[3H]Ro 15-1788 binding to a membrane preparation from
HEK 293 cells expressing
1
2
2 GABAA receptors.
[3H]Ro 15-1788 bound to these receptors with a
dissociation constant (Kd) of
0.98 ± 0.21 nM (Table 2),
which is in agreement with previously published reports (27).
Substitution of either of the two crucial tyrosines in the
subunit
with serine eliminated specific binding of [3H]Ro
15-1788 to the receptor. Muscimol binding to these mutant receptors
was similar to that of the wild-type receptor (Table 2).
[3H]Ro 15-1788 binding to transfected receptors
containing the more conservative substitution,
1Y209F was also
examined. A representative Scatchard analysis is also presented in Fig.
7 (
). The Kd value for
1Y209F
2
2 was 4.07 ± 0.38 nM (Table
2), which represents a 4-fold decrease in affinity compared with the
wild-type receptor (p = 0.0002). Receptors
containing substitutions of the corresponding tyrosines in the
2
subunit (
1
2
2Y172S,
1
2
2Y220F) had
[3H]Ro 15-1788 binding that was not significantly
different from the wild-type receptor (Fig. 8, Table 2).
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Actions of dzp on wild-type
1
2
2 and
2
2
GABAA receptors.
We examined the potentiation of
GABA-activated currents in
1
2
2 GABAA receptors by
dzp at concentrations ranging from 5 nM to 200 µM. Three apparent components were consistently observed in these dzp dose-potentiation relationships: (a) a fractional potentiation of 2.6 in the GABA-activated current that appeared to
saturate around 1 µM and demonstrated an apparent
EC50 value of 65 nM, (b) a slight depression
evident at 1- 20 µM dzp, and (c) a further potentiation
at > 20 µM dzp that imparted an additional 1.9-fold
increase (with 200 µM diazepam) in the GABA-activated current over that seen at lower dzp concentrations. We examined the
higher dzp concentration range based on the expectation that BZ-binding
site mutants might induce rightward shifts in the dose-potentiation relationships for dzp.
5
2
2,
1
2
2, and
2
2
GABAA receptors and in oocytes injected with mRNA isolated
from chick brains (33, 35). This depression was not observed when the
1 subunit was substituted for the
2 subunit (32, 35), indicating
this effect depends on the particular
subunit isoform. The
potentiation we observed at dzp concentrations of > 20 µM may represent an additional lower affinity BZ-binding
site on the GABAA receptor complex. Micromolar-affinity
BZ-binding sites have been reported in the mammalian central nervous
system (38, 39).
The observation that
2
2 GABA receptors show a similar dzp
sensitivity as
1
2
2 GABA receptors is intriguing given that a
significant component of the BZ-binding site is presumed to be on the
subunit (16-23). One possibility is that the
2 or
2 subunit
could substitute for the absence of the
subunit in the actions of
dzp. The
1 subunit tyrosine residues we identified in this study are
conserved in both the
2 and
2 subunits. The role of the
2
tyrosines (
2Tyr157 and
2Tyr205) would be difficult to assess
because substitution of either of these tyrosines with serine nearly
abolishes GABA-mediated activation (29). We tested the potential role
of the
2 tyrosines in the actions of dzp on
2
2 GABA receptors.
Mutation of either of these tyrosines to serine (
2Y172S and
2Y220S) did not impair dzp sensitivity, indicating homologous
regions of the
2 subunit do not substitute for the
1 subunit.
Other possibilities are that the the
2 subunit substitutes for the
1 subunit or other regions of the
2 subunit (not
2Tyr172 or
2Tyr220) are involved in the actions of dzp. A third possibility is
that a subunit endogenous to the oocyte is substituting for the
subunit and imparting dzp sensitivity on the expressed GABA receptors.
1Tyr159 and
1Tyr209 may form part of the BZ-binding
site.
Structure-function studies of ligand-receptor interactions
have typically revealed that binding sites are formed by contributions from several disparate regions of a subunit, as well as domains from
neighboring subunits. Thus, the previously identified residues of the
and
subunits (21, 22) may contribute only part of the binding
site. In this study, we identified two residues on the
1 subunit
(positions 159 and 209) that seem to be crucial for the actions of BZs
on GABAA receptors. The mutation Y159S nearly eliminated
the potentiation seen at low dzp concentrations, whereas Y209S shifted
the dzp EC50 value and reduced the maximal potentiation.
The more conservative substitution of these tyrosines with
phenylalanine produced moderate shifts in comparison with the serine
substitutions.
1Tyr159 or
1Tyr209 with serine abolished
specific binding of [3H]Ro 15-1788. Although caution
must be exercised in interpreting binding studies under these
conditions (40), the simplest interpretation is that mutation of the
tyrosine residues impaired binding of dzp to the BZ receptor. Thus,
1Tyr159 and
1Tyr209 may be components of the BZ-binding
site/pocket itself.
Mutation of the corresponding tyrosine residues of the
2 subunit
produced a ~2-fold increase in the EC50 (Table 1) with no
significant change in the binding affinity of [3H]Ro
15-1788 (Table 2). Thus, the
2 subunit mutations may impair dzp-mediated potentiation at steps subsequent to BZ binding.
Nevertheless, such slight shifts for nonconservative substitutions
suggest that these two residues are not key determinants in the actions
of BZs on GABAA receptors.
Although there was a consistency in the effects of the mutations on the
EC50 values (Table 1)and
Kd values (Table 2), one cannot
directly compare these parameters because different ligands were used
in the binding and electrophysiological studies. Understanding the
correlation between the Kd and the
EC50/fractional potentiation, however, must await
further understanding of the relation between the observed affinity and
efficacy of a ligand.
Other studies.
A putative model of the BZ-binding site is
beginning to emerge from structure-function studies of the
GABAA receptor. In this model, several disparate domains of
the
subunit contribute components of the BZ-binding site (Fig. 1).
The histidine at position 101 is photoaffinity labeled by BZ-site
ligands (23) and, when mutated to arginine, eliminates dzp binding (22)
and dzp-mediated potentiation (41). A separate region associated with
the glycine residue at position 200 of the
subunit (21) seems to be
important for BZ affinity. More recently, Buhr et al. (31)
observed that substitution of an alanine for the threonine at position
202 or tyrosine at position 161 of the
1 subunit enhanced the
maximal potentiation by dzp. In the current study, we replaced this
tyrosine at position 161 and did not observe an effect on dzp-dependent potentiation of the GABA-induced currents (see Table 1), suggesting a
more distal role for
1Tyr202 in comparison with
1His100,
1Tyr159, and
1Gly200 in dzp-dependent modulation of GABA-induced
currents.
1 subunit in the vicinity of
His101, Tyr159, and Gly200 seem to be associated with the BZ-binding site. In addition, mutation of the threonine at position 142 (28) or
the phenylalanine at position 77 (31) of the
subunit alters BZ
efficacy (Fig. 1), suggesting the BZ-binding site may be at the
/
subunit interface (23).
Two of the domains implicated in BZ binding, in the vicinity of
Tyr159 and
Gly200, are homologous to domains of the
subunit implicated as components of the GABA binding site (Fig. 1).
Furthermore, the two tyrosines at positions 159 and 209 that we have
identified in the
1 subunit crucial for BZ binding are homologous to
tyrosine residues in the
2 subunit that seem to play a key role in
the binding of GABA. It has been suggested that the homology observed between the two ligand-binding segments for GABA and BZs may have arisen from gene duplication resulting in a modified agonist site that
now functions as an allosteric modulatory site in the GABAA receptor (23). Given the dramatic differences in the molecular structures of dzp and GABA, however, a significant correspondence in
the structures of their respective binding sites would not necessarily
be expected. Another intriguing possibility is that BZs increase the
sensitivity of the GABA receptor by uncovering an additional
GABA-binding site(s). An increase in the number of binding sites with
no change in the number of binding events required to open the pore
could increase the GABA sensitivity without increasing the Hill
coefficient (42). In this scenario, the Y159S and Y209S substitutions
reported here impair dzp-mediated potentiation by impairing the binding
of GABA to this site, and the observed elimination of
[3H]Ro 15-1788 binding would be an indirect consequence
of the strict coupling between the GABA and BZ binding domains. A
comparison of the actions of dzp on the kinetics of single wild-type
and mutant GABAA receptors may help to distinguish these
two possible mechanisms.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 27, 1996; Accepted January 3, 1997
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AA09212, NS35291, and 5-P30-HD28815.
Send reprint requests to: David S. Weiss, Ph.D., Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1719 Sixth Avenue So., CIRC 410, Birmingham AL 35294. E-mail: dweiss{at}nrc.uab.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
BZ, benzodiazepine;
dzp, diazepam;
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid;
HEK, human
embryonic kidney.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Olsen, R. W. Drug interactions at the GABA receptor-ionophore complex. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 22:245-277 (1982)[Medline]. |
| 2. | Olsen, R. W. GABA-drug interactions. Prog. Drug. Res. 31:223-241 (1987)[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Sieghart, W.
GABAA receptors: ligand-gated Cl ion channels modulated by multiple drug-binding sites.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
13:446-450 (1992)[Medline].
|
| 4. | Choi, D. W., D. H. Farb, and G. D. Fischbach. Chlorodiazepoxide selectively augments GABA action in spinal cord cell cultures. Nature (Lond.) 269:342-344 (1977)[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Mohler, H. and
T. Okada.
Benzodiazepine receptor: demonstration in the central nervous system.
Science (Washington D. C.)
198:849-851 (1977) |
| 6. | Squires, R. F. and C. Brastrup. Benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain. Nature (Lond.) 266:732-734 (1977)[Medline]. |
| 7. | Olsen, R. W. GABA-benzodiazepine-barbiturate receptor interactions. J. Neurochem. 37:1-13 (1981)[Medline]. |
| 8. | Skerritt, J. H., M. Willow, and G. A. Johnston. Diazepam enhancement of low affinity GABA binding to rat brain membranes. Neurosci. Lett. 29:63-66 (1982)[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Study, R. E. and
J. L. Barker.
Diazepam and (±)-pentobarbital. fluctuation analysis reveals different mechanisms for potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid responses in cultured central neurons.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:7180-7184 (1981) |
| 10. |
Bormann, J. and
D. E. Clapham.
-Aminobutyric acid receptor channels in adrenal chromaffin cells: a patch-clamp study.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:2168-2172 (1985) |
| 11. |
Vicini, S.,
J. M. Mienville, and
E. Costa.
Actions of benzodiazepine and -carboline derivatives on -aminobutyric acid-activated Cl channels recorded from membrane patches of neonatal rat cortical neurons in culture.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
243:1195-1201 (1987) |
| 12. |
Twyman, R. E.,
C. J. Rogers, and
R. L. Macdonald.
Differential regulation of -aminobutyric acid receptor channels by diazepam and phenobarbital.
Ann. Neurol.
25:213-220 (1989)[Medline].
|
| 13. | Schofield, P. R., M. G. Darlison, N. Fujita, D. R. Burt, F. A. Stephenson, H. Rodriguez, L. M. Rhee, J. Ramachandran, V. Reale, T. A. Glencorse, P. H. Seeburg, and E. A. Barnard. Sequence and functional expression of the GABAA receptor shows a ligand-gated receptor super-family. Nature (Lond.) 328:221-227 (1987)[Medline]. |
| 14. | Barnard, E. A., M. G. Darlison, and P. H. Seeburg. Molecular biology of the GABAA receptor channel superfamily. Trends Neurosci. 10:502-509 (1987). |
| 15. | Macdonald, R. L. and R. W. Olsen. GABA receptor channels. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17:569-602 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 16. | Mohler, H., W. Sieghart, J. G. Richards, and W. Hunkeler. Photoaffinity labeling of benzodiazepine receptors with a partial inverse agonist. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 102:191-192 (1980). |
| 17. |
Bureau, M and
R. W. Olsen.
-Aminobutyric acid/benzodiazepine receptor protein carries binding sites for both ligands on both two major peptide subunits.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
153:1006-1011 (1988)[Medline].
|
| 18. | Fuchs, K., H. Mohler, and W. Sieghart. Various proteins from rat brain, specifically and irreversibly labeled by [3H]flunitrazepam, are distinct alpha-subunits of the GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex. Neurosci. Lett. 90:314-319 (1988)[Medline]. |
| 19. | Pritchett, D. B., H. Sontheimer, B. D. Shivers, S. Ymer, H. Kettenmann, P. R. Schofield, and P. H. Seeburg. Importance of a novel GABAA receptor subunit for benzodiazepine pharmacology. Nature (Lond.) 338:582-585 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Pritchett, D. B.,
H. Luddens, and
P. H. Seeburg.
Type I and type II GABAA-benzodiazepine receptors produced in transfected cells.
Science (Washington D. C.)
245:1389-1392 (1989) |
| 21. |
Pritchett, D. B. and
P. H. Seeburg.
-Aminobutyric acid type A receptor point mutation increases the affinity of compounds for the benzodiazepine site.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1421-1425 (1991) |
| 22. |
Wieland, H. A.,
H. Luddens, and
P. H. Seeburg.
A single histidine in GABAA receptors is essential for benzodiazepine agonist binding.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:1426-1429 (1992) |
| 23. | Smith, G. B. and R. W. Olsen. Functional domains of GABAA receptors. Trends Pharm. Sci.. 16:162-168 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Casalotti, S. O.,
A. Stephenson, and
E. A. Barnard.
Separate subunits for agonist and benzodiazepine binding in the -aminobutyric acidA receptor oligomer.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:15013-15016 (1986) |
| 25. |
Deng, L.,
R. W. Ransom, and
R. W. Olsen.
[3H]Muscimol photolabels the -aminobutyric acid receptor binding site on a peptide subunit distinct from that labelled with benzodiazepine.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
138:1308-1314 (1986)[Medline].
|
| 26. | Malherbe, P., A. Draguhn, G. Multhaup, K. Beyreuther, and H. Mohler. GABAA-receptor expressed from rat brain alpha- and beta-subunit cDNAs displays potentiation by benzodiazepine receptor ligands. Brain Res. 8:199-208 (1990). |
| 27. |
Stephenson, F. A.,
M. J. Duggan, and
S. Pollard.
The 2 subunit is an integral component of the -aminobutyric acidA receptor but the 1 polypeptide is the principal site of the agonist benzodiazepine photoaffinity labeling reaction.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:21160-21165 (1990) |
| 28. |
Mihic, S. J.,
P. J. Whiting,
R. L. Klein RL,
K. A. Wafford, and
R. A. Harris.
A single amino acid of the human gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor 2 subunit determines benzodiazepine efficacy.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:32768-32773 (1994) |
| 29. |
Amin, J. and
D. S. Weiss.
GABAA receptor needs two homologous domains of the subunit for activation by GABA, but not by pentobarbital.
Nature (Lond.)
366:565-569 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 30. |
Amin, J.,
I. M. Dickerson, and
D. S. Weiss.
The agonist binding site of the -aminobutyric acid type A channel is not formed by the extracellular cysteine loop.
Mol. Pharmacol.
45:317-323 (1994)[Abstract].
|
| 31. |
Buhr, A.,
R. Baur,
P. Malherbe, and
E. Sigel.
Point mutations of the 1 2 2 -aminobutyric acidA receptor affecting modulation of the channel by ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site.
Mol. Pharmacol.
49:1080-1084 (1996)[Abstract].
|
| 32. | Sigel, E., R. Baur, G. Trube, H. Mohler, and P. Malherbe. The effect of subunit composition of rat brain GABAA receptors on channel function. Neuron 5:703-711 (1990)[Medline]. |
| 33. |
Im, H. K.,
W. B. Im,
B. J. Hamilton,
D. B. Carter, and
P. F. Vonvoigtlander.
Potentiation of -aminobutyric acid-induced chloride currents by various benzodiazepine site agonists with the 1 2, 2 2, 1 2 2 subtypes of cloned -aminobutyric acid type A receptors.
Mol. Pharmacol.
44:866-870 (1993)[Abstract].
|
| 34. |
Whittemore, E. R.,
W. Yang,
J. A. Drewe, and
R. M. Woodward.
Pharmacology of the human -aminobutyric acidA receptor 4 subunit expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes.
Mol. Pharmacol.
50:1364-1375 (1996)[Abstract].
|
| 35. |
Puia, G.,
S. Vicini,
P. H. Seeburg, and
E. Costa.
Influence of recombinant -aminobutyric acid-A receptor subunit composition on the action of allosteric modulators of -aminobutyric acid-gated Cl currents.
Mol. Pharmacol.
39:691-696 (1991)[Abstract].
|
| 36. | Sigel, E. and R. Baur. Allosteric modulation by benzodiazepine receptor ligands of the GABAA receptor channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Neurosci. 8:289-295 (1988)[Abstract]. |
| 37. |
Chan, C. Y. and
D. H. Farb.
Modulation of neurotransmitter action: control of the -aminobutyric acid response through the benzodiazepine receptor.
J. Neurosci.
5:2365-2373 (1985)[Abstract].
|
| 38. |
Bowling, A. C. and
R. J. DeLorenzo.
Micromolar affinity benzodiazepine receptors: identification and characterization in central nervous system.
Science (Washington D. C.)
216:1247-1250 (1982) |
| 39. | Farb, D. H., L. A. Borden, C. Y. Chan, C. M. Czajkowski, T. T. Gibbs, and G. D. Schiller. Modulation of neuronal function through benzodiazepine receptors: biochemical and electrophysiological studies of neurons in primary monolayer cell culture. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 435:1-31 (1984). |
| 40. | Colquhoun, D. and M. Farrant. The binding issue. Nature (Lond.) 366:510-511 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 41. | Kleingoor, C., H. A. Wieland, E. R. Korpi, P. H. Seeburg, and H. Kettenmann. Current potentiation by diazepam but not GABA sensitivity is determined by a single histidine residue. Neuroreport 4:187-190 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 42. | Amin, J. and D. S. Weiss. Insights into the activation mechanism of rho1 GABA receptors obtained by coexpression of wild type and activation-impaired subunits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 263:272-282 (1996). |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Rayes, M. J. De Rosa, S. M. Sine, and C. Bouzat Number and Locations of Agonist Binding Sites Required to Activate Homomeric Cys-Loop Receptors J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 6022 - 6032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hsiao, K. B. Mihalak, K. L. Magleby, and C. W. Luetje Zinc Potentiates Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors by Increasing Burst Duration J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 999 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sancar, S. S. Ericksen, A. M. Kucken, J. A. Teissere, and C. Czajkowski Structural Determinants for High-Affinity Zolpidem Binding to GABA-A receptors Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 38 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Jones-Davis, L. Song, M. J. Gallagher, and R. L. Macdonald Structural Determinants of Benzodiazepine Allosteric Regulation of GABAA Receptor Currents J. Neurosci., August 31, 2005; 25(35): 8056 - 8065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Baur and E. Sigel Benzodiazepines Affect Channel Opening of GABAA Receptors Induced by Either Agonist Binding Site Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1005 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Berezhnoy, Y. Nyfeler, A. Gonthier, H. Schwob, M. Goeldner, and E. Sigel On the Benzodiazepine Binding Pocket in GABAA Receptors J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3160 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Baumann, R. Baur, and E. Sigel Individual Properties of the Two Functional Agonist Sites in GABAA Receptors J. Neurosci., December 3, 2003; 23(35): 11158 - 11166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Kucken, J. A. Teissere, J. Seffinga-Clark, D. A. Wagner, and C. Czajkowski Structural Requirements for Imidazobenzodiazepine Binding to GABAA Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 289 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Sawyer, D. C. Chiara, R. W. Olsen, and J. B. Cohen Identification of the Bovine gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor alpha Subunit Residues Photolabeled by the Imidazobenzodiazepine [3H]Ro15-4513 J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 50036 - 50045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Baumann, R. Baur, and E. Sigel Forced Subunit Assembly in alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 GABAA Receptors. INSIGHT INTO THE ABSOLUTE ARRANGEMENT J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46020 - 46025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-Q. Huang and G. H. Dillon Functional Characterization of GABAA Receptors in Neonatal Hypothalamic Brain Slice J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1655 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-A. Thompson, P. B. Wingrove, L. Connelly, P. J. Whiting, and K. A. Wafford Tracazolate Reveals a Novel Type of Allosteric Interaction with Recombinant gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2002; 61(4): 861 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Williams and M. H. Akabas Benzodiazepines Induce a Conformational Change in the Region of the gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor alpha 1-Subunit M3 Membrane-Spanning Segment Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2000; 58(5): 1129 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Newell, M. Davies, A. N. Bateson, and S. M. J. Dunn Tyrosine 62 of the gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor beta 2 Subunit Is an Important Determinant of High Affinity Agonist Binding J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2000; 275(19): 14198 - 14204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Kucken, D. A. Wagner, P. R. Ward, J. A. Teissére, A. J. Boileau, and C. Czajkowski Identification of Benzodiazepine Binding Site Residues in the gamma 2 Subunit of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2000; 57(5): 932 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. X. Carlson, A. C. Engblom, U. Kristiansen, A. Schousboe, and R. W. Olsen A Single Glycine Residue at the Entrance to the First Membrane-Spanning Domain of the gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor beta 2 Subunit Affects Allosteric Sensitivity to GABA and Anesthetics Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2000; 57(3): 474 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Boileau and C. Czajkowski Identification of Transduction Elements for Benzodiazepine Modulation of the GABAA Receptor: Three Residues Are Required for Allosteric Coupling J. Neurosci., December 1, 1999; 19(23): 10213 - 10220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. J. Dunn, M. Davies, A. L. Muntoni, and J. J. Lambert Mutagenesis of the Rat alpha 1 Subunit of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Reveals the Importance of Residue 101 in Determining the Allosteric Effects of Benzodiazepine Site Ligands Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 768 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Renard, A. Olivier, P. Granger, P. Avenet, D. Graham, M. Sevrin, P. George, and F. Besnard Structural Elements of the gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Conferring Subtype Selectivity for Benzodiazepine Site Ligands J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 1999; 274(19): 13370 - 13374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sigel, M. T. Schaerer, A. Buhr, and R. Baur The Benzodiazepine Binding Pocket of Recombinant alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors: Relative Orientation of Ligands and Amino Acid Side Chains Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 1998; 54(6): 1097 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. McKernan, S. Farrar, I. Collins, F. Emms, A. Asuni, K. Quirk, and H. Broughton Photoaffinity Labeling of the Benzodiazepine Binding Site of alpha 1beta 3gamma 2 gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors with Flunitrazepam Identifies a Subset of Ligands that Interact Directly with His102 of the alpha Subunit and Predicts Orientation of These within the Benzodiazepine Pharmacophore Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1998; 54(1): 33 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Boileau, A. M. Kucken, A. R. Evers, and C. Czajkowski Molecular Dissection of Benzodiazepine Binding and Allosteric Coupling Using Chimeric gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Subunits Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 1998; 53(2): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Wingrove, S. A. Thompson, K. A. Wafford, and P. J. Whiting Key Amino Acids in the gamma Subunit of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor that Determine Ligand Binding and Modulation at the Benzodiazepine Site Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 1997; 52(5): 874 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Buhr, M. T. Schaerer, R. Baur, and E. Sigel Residues at Positions 206 and 209 of the alpha 1 Subunit of gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Influence Affinities for Benzodiazepine Binding Site Ligands Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1997; 52(4): 676 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Buhr and E. Sigel A point mutation in the gamma 2 subunit of gamma -aminobutyric acid type A receptors results in altered benzodiazepine binding site specificity PNAS, August 5, 1997; 94(16): 8824 - 8829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hang, H. Shi, D. Li, Y. Liao, D. Lian, Y. Xiao, and H. Xue Ligand Binding and Structural Properties of Segments of GABAA Receptor alpha 1 Subunit Overexpressed in Escherichia coli J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2000; 275(25): 18818 - 18823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||