MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, C.

0026-895X/97/040582-08$3.00/0
Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY 52:582-589 (1997).

Identification and Characterization of a Novel Endothelin Receptor That Binds Both ETA- and ETB-Selective Ligands

Ponnal Nambi, Mark Pullen, Jamie Kincaid, Parvathi Nuthulaganti, Nambi Aiyar, David P. Brooks, Miklos Gellai, and Chandrika Kumar

Departments of Renal Pharmacology (P.N., M.P., J.K., D.P.B., M.G.), Cardiovascular Pharmacology (N.A.), and Molecular Genetics (C.K.), SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, PA 19406-0939

    Summary
Summary
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

This study demonstrates the presence of a novel endothelin (ET) receptor subtype that displays high affinity for both ETA- and ETB-selective ligands. This subtype has been identified in canine spleen membranes using ETB-selective agonists ET-3, IRL-1620, sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) as well as ETA-selective antagonists BQ123 and related cyclic pentapeptides. Binding of 125I-ET-3 to canine spleen membranes was specific and saturable with an apparent dissociation constant of 130 pM and maximum binding (Bmax) of 240.0 fmol/mg protein. Although the apparent affinities obtained with 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3 were comparable (90 and 130 pM, respectively), the maximum binding obtained with 125I-ET-3 was ~35% of that obtained with 125I-ET-1, which indicates that canine spleen possesses both ETA and ETB receptors in the ratio 65:35. Competition binding experiments using 125I-ET-3 and unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and IRL-1620 suggested that although ET-1 and ET-3 displayed similar high affinity, S6c and IRL-1620 were 20-300-fold weaker than ET-1 and ET-3 in competing for 125I-ET-3 binding to canine spleen membranes. In addition, BQ123, an ETA-selective antagonist, displaced 125I-ET-3 binding from canine spleen with an IC50 value of 30 nM. Similar profiles were obtained with related cyclic pentapeptides. Electrophysiological studies performed on Xenopus laevis oocytes injected with canine spleen poly(A)+ RNA indicated that the ETB receptor present in these tissues is functional and displays the same pharmacology as that observed in binding studies using these membranes. As a comparison, both binding and functional studies were performed in canine lung and the data indicate that the ETB receptor present in this tissue is similar to that of the cloned human ETB receptor but different from that present in canine spleen. These observations were further confirmed by performing cross-linking experiments on these membranes. Although canine lung and cloned human ETB receptors displayed the same molecular weight bands with similar pharmacology, canine spleen ETB receptors displayed different molecular weight bands and different pharmacology. In addition, the ETB receptors present in canine spleen were also identified in canine bladder, monkey spleen and human spleen. Thus, the data presented in this manuscript provide evidence for the presence of a novel ETB receptor in different tissues as well as different species including human.

    Introduction
Summary
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

ET-1, a 21-amino-acid peptide identified initially and isolated from endothelial cell culture medium, has attracted considerable attention because of its potent and long-lasting vasoconstrictor property (1). Soon after its discovery, two other isopeptides, ET-2 and ET-3, and a group of snake venom toxins (sarafotoxins) were identified (2, 3). The biological effects of these peptides were shown to be mediated through the binding of these peptides to specific cell surface receptors that were identified in a number of tissues and cell lines (4-7). ET receptors display subtype heterogeneity and, based on the binding properties of various ET-related peptides, they have been classified as ETA and ETB. ETA receptors display high affinity for only ET-1 and ET-2, whereas ETB receptors display high affinity for ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and S6c (8). Both receptor subtypes have been cloned, sequenced, expressed and characterized from a number of species, including human (9-11). According to the initial classification, ETA receptors were shown to mediate vasoconstriction and ETB receptors were shown to mediate endothelium-dependent vasodilation (4-7). Development of subtype-selective antagonists played a critical role in demonstrating the involvement of ETA and ETB receptors in normal cellular functions as well as their role in various pathological conditions (12-15). BQ123, described originally by Ihara et al. (16) as an ETA-selective antagonist, was used by many investigators in binding as well as functional studies because it displayed 1000-fold higher affinity for ETA receptors than for ETB receptors (17-21). However, conflicting data from whole animal studies, in which S6c caused potent vasoconstriction in addition to its originally described vasodilation, necessitated the search for additional subtypes of ET receptors, possibly ETB receptor subtypes (22-25).

The present study was undertaken to identify and characterize subtypes of ETB receptors by binding and functional studies. The data presented in this article demonstrate clearly for the first time that the ETB receptors present in canine spleen, canine bladder, monkey spleen, and human spleen are novel and are different from those present in canine lung and cloned human ETB receptors.

    Materials and Methods
Summary
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

125I-ET-1 (specific activity 2200 Ci/mmol) and 125I-ET-3 (specific activity, 2200 Ci/mmol) were obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, S6c, BQ123, BQ610, JKC 301, and JKC 302 were from American Peptides (Sunnyvale, CA). All other chemicals were of the highest grades available.

Membrane preparation. The tissues (canine lung, spleen, bladder, monkey spleen and human spleen) were washed in ice cold saline, dissected into small pieces and frozen in liquid N2. The frozen tissues were homogenized in buffer (1 g of tissue/10 ml) containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 0.25 M sucrose, 100 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mg/ml aprotinin and 1 mg/ml leupeptin) using a Tekmar tissuemizer (Cincinnati, OH) model TR-10 polytron at a setting of 80 for 4 × 15 sec on ice. Homogenates were centrifuged for 15 min at 1000 × g at 4°. The supernatants were filtered through two layers of cheesecloth and recentrifuged at 40,000 × g for 30 min at 4°. The pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5 and 10 mM MgCl2 and stored in small aliquots after freezing in liquid N2.

Radioligand binding. 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3 binding to membranes prepared from the above mentioned tissues were performed as described previously (26). Assay volumes were 50 µl and the concentrations of membrane proteins were 5-15, 20-40, 0.5-1.5, 2-4 and 3-6 µg/tube for canine lung, spleen, bladder, monkey spleen, and human spleen, respectively. The concentrations of the radioligands were 30-1000 pM for saturation binding and 100-300 pM for competition binding experiments. Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled ET-1 or ET-3. Incubations were for 60 min at 30° and bound and free ligands were separated by filtration using GF/C filter paper and Brandel cell harvester (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD). Each experiment was performed 2-4 times with multiple membrane preparations and the variation between experiments was less than 10%. The data shown are from one experiment which is representative of all the experiments performed under that condition.

Cross-linking of ETB receptors. ETB receptors were cross-linked following the procedure of Nambi et al. (27) with minor modifications. Briefly, 50 pM 125I-ET-3 was added to membranes prepared from CHO cells expressing human ETB receptors, canine lung and canine spleen (6-7 fmol of ET-3 binding activity) in the binding buffer and incubated for 60 min at 30° in the absence and presence of 0.3 µM unlabeled ET-3 (to measure nonspecific binding), 30 nM IRL-1620 or 300 nM BQ610. At the end of incubation, disuccinimidyl suberate dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide was added at a concentration of 5 mM to each tube, and the incubations were continued for another 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by centrifuging the mixture and washing the pellets several times before resuspending in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer containing beta -mercaptoethanol. These samples were run on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and the gel was exposed to x-ray film after being dried.

Xenopus laevis oocyte electrophysiology. Large X. laevis females were anesthetized by hypothermia and ovaries were removed surgically. Individual defolliculated oocytes were obtained by manual dissection and stage V oocytes were selected for microinjection (28). For each experimental group, 20-30 oocytes were injected (Drummond injection apparatus) with 50 nl of water containing 25 ng of canine spleen or lung poly(A)+ RNA. Injected oocytes were maintained in Barth's medium at 18° for 48 hr to allow for ET receptor protein expression. Electrophysiology was performed using the voltage clamp technique, with an oocyte voltage clamp apparatus (Warner Instrument, CT). Oocyte membrane potentials were clamped at -60 mV and the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel activity was recorded in Barth's medium at room temperature as described (29).

    Results and Discussion
Summary
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Saturation binding experiments using 125I-ET-1 (binds to both ETA and ETB receptors with the same affinity) and 125I-ET-3 (binds to ETB receptors with high affinity) were performed in membranes prepared from canine lung and spleen to quantify the proportion of ETA and ETB receptors. As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, both tissues displayed high affinity binding sites for 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3, indicating the presence of both ETA and ETB receptors in these tissues. The apparent dissociation constants (Kds) were 33 and 45 pM for 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3, respectively, in canine lung membranes (Fig. 1C), whereas they were 90 and 130 pM for 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3, respectively, in canine spleen membranes (Fig. 2C). The maximum binding was 1100 and 750 fmol/mg for 125I-ET-1 and 600 and 240 fmol/mg for 125I-ET-3 in canine lung and spleen, respectively (Fig. 1C and 2C). Thus, the proportion of 125I-ET-3 binding was 55% and 35% of that obtained with 125I-ET-1 in canine lung and spleen, respectively (Fig. 1C and 2C). The nonspecific binding for 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3 was from 5-25% and 5-50%, respectively, in both tissues (Fig. 1, A and B, and Fig. 2, A and B).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Saturation binding of 125I-ET-1 (A) and 125I-ET-3 (B) to membranes prepared from canine lung. Increasing concentrations of 125I-ET-1 or 125I-ET-3 were added to membranes in the absence (total binding) or presence (nonspecific binding) of 1 µM unlabeled ET-1 or ET-3 and incubated for 60 min at 30°. The reactions were stopped by filtering the incubation mixture as explained in Materials and Methods. The data presented are from one experiment that is representative of two or three experiments. black-square, Total binding; open circle , nonspecific binding; bullet , specific binding. C, Scatchard plots of the specific binding for 125I-ET-1 (open circle ) and 125I-ET-3 (bullet ) obtained from saturation binding experiment presented in A and B.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Saturation binding of 125I-ET-1 (A) and 125I-ET-3 (B) to membranes prepared from canine spleen membranes. The experiment was performed as explained in Fig. 1 legend. black-square, Total binding; open circle , nonspecific binding; bullet , specific binding. C, Scatchard plots of the specific binding for 125I-ET-1 (open circle ) and 125I-ET-3 (bullet ) obtained from the saturation binding experiments.

Because the focus of this effort was to identify subtypes of ETB receptors, 125I-ET-3 was used as the radioligand for competition binding experiments because it will bind only to ETB receptors at the concentrations used for the binding studies. For comparison, CHO cell membranes expressing recombinant human ETA and ETB receptors were used in the competition binding experiments and 125I-ET-1 and 125I-ET-3 were used as the radioligands for ETA and ETB receptors, respectively. Competition of 125I-ET binding by unlabeled ET-1 and ET-3 from human ETA, human ETB and canine lung and spleen ETB receptors shown in Fig. 3. Although ET-1 gave monophasic superimposable competition curves in all four membranes (Fig. 3, top), ET-3 displayed high affinity competition curves in CHO/ETB, canine lung and spleen membranes, whereas it was 90-120-fold less potent in competing for CHO/ETA receptors (Fig. 3, bottom; Table 1). This is not surprising because ET-3 displays very weak affinity for ETA receptors. Fig. 4 presents the competition binding data obtained with the ETB-selective agonists, S6c and IRL-1620. As shown in Fig. 4, top, S6c was as potent as ET-1 and ET-3 in competing for human ETB receptors, whereas in canine lung and spleen, it displayed two affinities (Fig. 4, top). In canine lung, the predominant proportion (68%) of binding showed high affinity for S6c, whereas in canine spleen, the predominant proportion (74%) displayed low affinity for S6c (Fig. 4, top). As expected, S6c showed very weak affinity for human ETA receptors (Fig. 4, top). Similar binding profiles were obtained with IRL-1620 in these four preparations. Although IRL-1620 showed extremely weak binding to ETA receptors, it remained 6-10-fold less potent than ET-1, ET-3, and S6c for ETB receptors (Fig. 4, bottom). In canine spleen and lung, IRL-1620 competed with two affinities. The percentages of high affinity IRL-1620 binding sites in canine lung and spleen were 63 and 27, respectively (Fig. 4, bottom).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Competition of 125I-ET-1 binding to human ETA or 125I-ET-3 binding to human ETB, canine lung and canine spleen membranes by unlabeled ET-1 (top) or ET-3 (bottom). Increasing concentrations of unlabeled ET-1 or ET-3 were added to human ETA (black-square), ETB (black-triangle), canine lung ETB (black-diamond ), and canine spleen ETB (black-down-triangle ) receptors to compete with 0.3 nM 125I-ET-1 or 125I-ET-3. The incubations were for 60 min at 30° and the bound and free ligands were separated as explained in Materials and Methods. The data presented are from one experiment that is representative of three or four similar experiments.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Analysis of competition binding data obtained from recombinant human ETA and ETB receptors and canine lung and spleen ETB receptors

Competition binding experiments were done as explained in Materials and Methods and legends to Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. The radioligands used were 125I-ET-1 for human ETA and 125I-ET-3 for ETB canine lung and spleen. %, percentage of receptor; H, high affinity; L, low affinity. The data were analyzed using in Plot (Graph Pad) program. The data presented are from one experiment that is representative of two or three experiments.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Competition of 125I-ET-1 binding to human ETA (black-square) and 125I-ET-3 binding to human ETB (black-triangle), canine lung ETB (black-diamond ), and canine spleen ETB (black-down-triangle ) receptors by unlabeled S6c (top) and IRL-1620 (bottom). The experiment was performed as explained in legend to Fig. 3.

As a negative control for ETB receptors, we also tested BQ123, the putative ETA-selective antagonist, in these preparations. The unexpected results of these experiments are shown in Fig. 5, top. BQ123 was very potent in competing for 125I-ET-3 binding to canine spleen membranes (Fig. 5, top). In addition, canine spleen ETB receptors displayed two affinities for BQ123. The predominant (76%) receptor displayed high affinity (Ki = 12.3 nM) for BQ123, whereas 24% of the receptors displayed low affinity for BQ123 (Ki = 63 µM). This low affinity Ki value compared well with the published Ki value obtained for BQ123 with cloned human ETB receptors (30). In addition, the proportion of canine spleen ET receptors that showed low affinity for BQ123 (Ki = 63 µM) had high affinity for S6c and IRL-1620 (Ki = 0.34 and 0.58 nM, respectively) and the proportion of canine spleen ET receptors that demonstrated high affinity (Ki = 12.3 nM) for BQ123 showed low affinities for S6c and IRL-1620 (Ki = 100 and 2530 nM, respectively) (Table 1). These data indicate clearly that BQ123 was binding to ETB receptors present in canine spleen and that this ETB receptor was different from the one present in canine lung and the cloned human ETB receptors. Indeed, BQ123 displayed very similar binding profiles in canine lung and cloned human ETB receptors (Fig. 5a).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Competition of 125I-ET-1 binding to human ETA (black-square) and 125I-ET-3 binding to human ETB (black-triangle), canine lung ETB (black-diamond ), and canine spleen ETB (black-down-triangle ) receptors by unlabeled BQ123 (top) and BQ610 (bottom). The experiment was performed as explained in legend Fig. 3. The data are from one experiment that is representative of three or four similar experiments.

To further confirm this novel observation, we performed additional experiments using other ETA-selective antagonists (BQ610, JKC301, and JKC302) (Fig. 5, bottom, and 6). BQ610 displaced 125I-ET-1 binding from human ETA receptors with a Ki value of 13.3 nM and was very weak in displacing 125I-ET-3 binding from human ETB receptors (Fig. 5, bottom; Table 1). Similar to BQ123, it displayed two affinities for displacing 125I-ET-3 from canine spleen. The Ki values were 4.06 nM and 100 µM for the high and low affinity sites, respectively; the proportion of high and low affinity sites was 69 and 31%, respectively (Fig. 5, bottom; Table 1). Similar binding curves were obtained with JKC301 (Fig. 6, top) and JKC302 (Fig. 6, bottom), two other ETA selective antagonists. JKC302 was weaker than JKC301 in ETA and canine spleen preparations (Fig. 6, bottom); however, the binding profiles were very similar. Because spleen tissue is highly proteolytic, it was important to find out whether the binding profiles obtained with BQ123 and related compounds were caused by proteolysis of these peptides. To address this possibility, competition experiments were performed in the presence (data not shown) and absence of a protease inhibitor cocktail; the data indicated that there was no difference in the binding profiles whether the protease inhibitors were present or absent.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Competition of 125I-ET-1 binding to human ETA (black-square) and 125I-ET-3 binding to human ETB (black-triangle), canine lung ETB (black-diamond ), and canine spleen ETB (black-down-triangle ) receptors by unlabeled JKC 301 (top) and JKC 302 (bottom). The experiment was performed as explained in legend to Fig. 3.

Thus, the data presented thus far indicate that ETA-selective antagonists displayed very similar affinities for cloned human ETA receptors and canine spleen ETB receptors. At the concentrations (100-300 pM) used in these competition binding studies, 125I-ET-3 has been shown to bind only to ETB receptors; thus, in competition binding studies, ET-3 did not have any effect on 125I-ET-1 binding to ETA receptors up to 1 nM (Fig. 3, bottom). Furthermore, 125I-ET-1 was purposely not used for competition binding experiments in canine spleen and lung because it will bind to both ETA and ETB receptors and complicate the interpretation of the data. A summary of the Ki values and the ratio of different affinity sites are presented in Table 1. These interesting observations were further confirmed by performing cross-linking studies on these membranes; the data are presented in Fig. 7. Canine lung and cloned human ETB receptors displayed two specific bands at approximate molecular masses of 56 and 34 kDa (Fig. 7, A and B, lane 1). The labeling of these two bands was blocked by 30 nM IRL-1620 (Fig. 7, A and B, lane 3), but not by 300 nM BQ610 (Fig. 7, A and B, lane 4). On the other hand, cross-linking of canine spleen membranes with 125I ET-3 resulted in specific labeling of two bands at 65 and 46 kDa (Fig. 7C, lane 1), and the labeling of these two bands was blocked by 300 nM BQ610 (Fig. 7C, lane 4) and not 30 nM IRL-1620 (Fig. 7C, lane 3). Nonspecific labeling was identified in the presence of 300 nM unlabeled ET-3 (Fig. 7, lanes 2). The differences observed in the molecular masses of 125I ET-3 labeled bands between canine spleen, canine lung, and recombinant human ETB receptor may be caused by differences in post-translational modifications such as glycosylation of these receptors. Thus, these data further confirm the observations made in the binding studies.


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Cross-linking of 125I ET-3 to membranes prepared from CHO cells stably transfected with recombinant human ETB receptors (A), canine lung (B) and canine spleen (C). Membranes were cross-linked with 125I ET-3 in the absence (lane 1) or presence of 0.3 µM unlabeled ET-3 (lane 2), 30 nM IRL-1620 (lane 3), and 300 nM BQ610 (lane 4) as explained in Materials and Methods.

Studies were also performed to examine whether these receptors are functional. Heterologous expression of this ETB receptor in X. laevis oocytes resulted in increased Ca2+-activated chloride current in response to ET-3. Actual tracings of the responses obtained with X. laevis oocytes injected with water or poly(A)+ RNA isolated from canine spleen or lung are shown in Fig. 8A. In addition, S6c (10 nM) also increased Ca2+-activated chloride current in oocytes injected with canine spleen poly(A)+ RNA (Fig. 8B). BQ123 (100 nM), ETA-selective antagonist, inhibited ET-3-mediated (1 nM) as well as S6c-mediated (10 nM) responses by 85%, whereas RES701 (100 nM), an ETB-selective antagonist (31), inhibited ET-3-mediated response by only 30% (Fig. 8B). The reason why BQ123 did not inhibit ET-3- or S6c-mediated responses completely may be attributable to the presence of a small proportion (~20%) of the BQ123-insensitive ETB receptor in these membranes (Table 1). RES701, which is a potent antagonist for cloned human ETB receptors (IC50 = 100 nM) and a weak antagonist for canine spleen ETB receptors (IC50 > 10 µM), inhibited only 30% of ET-3-mediated response in canine spleen, again suggesting the presence of two ETB receptors in this tissue (BQ123-sensitive and RES701-sensitive). These functional data agree with the binding data obtained with BQ123 and related compounds that show two site-competition binding curves (Figs. 5 and 6; Table 1). SB 209670 (nonselective ET receptor antagonist) inhibited ET-3-mediated response almost completely (Fig. 8B). In comparison, similar experiments were performed with oocytes injected with poly(A)+ RNA isolated from canine lung; the data are presented in Fig. 8C. As observed in canine spleen, both ET-3 and S6c stimulated a chloride current, indicating the presence of ETB receptors in canine lung; however, their responses were not inhibited by BQ123 (Fig. 8C), which suggests that these ETB receptors are different from those present in canine spleen. On the other hand, RES701 completely abolished the ET-3-mediated response, further confirming the difference between canine spleen and lung ETB receptors. As in canine spleen, SB 209670 also abolished ET-3-mediated response in canine lung, suggesting that SB 209670 did not distinguish between the ETB receptors present in these two tissues. These functional data agree well with the binding data obtained with canine spleen and lung membranes.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   A, Functional coupling of canine spleen and lung ETB receptors as assessed by X. laevis oocyte electrophysiology. Representative tracings of ET-3- (1 nM) induced current (in nanoAmperes) induced 2 days after oocyte injection with water (top) or 25 ng of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from canine lung or spleen. Arrow, addition of ET-3. The mean ± standard error peak current response to ET-3 is 160 ± 20 (n = 30). B, Histogram showing the chloride current induced in X. laevis oocytes injected with poly(A)+ RNA isolated from canine spleen. The experiment was performed as explained in Materials and Methods. Bars, 1, ET-3 alone; 2, S6c alone; 3, ET-3 + BQ123; 4, S6c + BQ123; 5, ET-3 + RES701; 6, ET-3 + SB 209670. The concentrations of ligands are 1 nM and 10 nM for ET-3 and S6c, respectively, and 100 nM for BQ123, RES701, and SB 209670. C, Histogram showing the chloride current induced in X. laevis oocytes injected with poly(A)+ RNA isolated from canine lung. The experiment was performed as explained in Materials and Methods. Bars, 1, ET-3 alone; 2, S6c alone; 3, ET-3 + BQ123; 4, S6c + BQ123; 5, ET-3 + RES701; 6, ET-3 + SB 209670. The concentrations of ligands are 1 nM and 10 nM for ET-3 and S6c, respectively, and 100 nM for BQ123, RES701, and SB 209670.

Is this novel ETB receptor present only in canine spleen or do other tissues and species display this subtype of ETB receptor? To address this question, binding studies were conducted using membranes prepared from different tissues and different species, including human. The data presented in Fig. 9 demonstrate clearly that this novel ETB receptor subtype is also present in canine bladder, monkey spleen, and human spleen. BQ123 (Fig. 9, top) displaced 125I-ET-3 binding from canine bladder and monkey spleen with apparent Ki values of 7 and 16 nM, respectively. In human spleen, the Ki values were 8.16 nM and 25.7 µM, respectively, and the distribution of the receptors in high and low affinity states were 30% and 70%, respectively. Similar results were obtained with BQ610 (Fig. 9, bottom), which displayed Ki values of 2.2 and 4.5 nM for canine bladder and monkey spleen, respectively. The Ki values for human spleen were 0.4 nM and 10.3 µM, respectively; the distribution of receptors in high and low affinity states were 29% and 71%, respectively. These data indicate clearly that the presence of this novel ETB receptor is not restricted to one tissue or species. It is present in different tissues and different species, including humans.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Competition of 125I-ET-3 binding to membranes prepared from human spleen (bullet ), monkey spleen (black-triangle), and canine bladder (black-square) by BQ123 (top) and BQ610 (bottom). The experiment was performed as explained in legend to Fig. 3.

In summary, the data presented in this manuscript demonstrate clearly that there are subtypes of ETB receptors and demonstrate for the first time the nonselective nature of BQ123 and related putative ETA-selective antagonists. We and many other investigators have used BQ123 to characterize and quantify the subtypes of ET receptors and to study their involvement in different physiological and pathological conditions. Further studies are needed to revisit the old conclusions that were drawn based on these antagonists alone, especially in spleen and bladder. In addition, future experiments will be directed toward the identification of the expression of this receptor subtype using a wide range of tissues and species. At present, we do not know the physiological function of this newly identified ET receptor, although it is tempting to speculate that this may be the subtype of ETB receptor that mediates vasoconstriction. Molecular cloning of this newly identified ETB receptor subtype and its expression will enable further characterization of this receptor by binding and functional studies as well as its tissue distribution and regulation in normal and pathological conditions.

    Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Sue Tirri for expert secretarial assistance. RES701-1 was a gift from Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. (Tokyo, Japan).

    Footnotes

Received February 20, 1997; Accepted June 12, 1997

Send reprint requests to: Ponnal Nambi, Ph.D., SmithKline Beecham, Dept. of Renal Pharmacology, UW2521, P.O. Box 1539, King of Prussia, PA 19406-0939. E-mail: ponnal_nambi{at}sbphrd.com

    Abbreviations

ET, endothelin; S6c, sarafotoxin 6c; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; BQ123, c(D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu); BQ610, (N,N-hexamethylene)-carbamoyl-Leu-D-Trp(CHO)-D-; JKC 301, cyclic(D-Ile-Leu-D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro); JKC 302, cyclic(D-Val-Leu-D-Trp-D-Ser-Pro).

    References
Summary
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

1. Yanagisawa, M., H. Kurihara, S. Kimura, Y. Tomobe, M. Kobayashi, Y. Mitsui, Y. Yazaki, K. Goto, and T. Masaki. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature (Lond.)  332:411-415 (1988)[Medline].
2. Inoue, A., M. Yanagisawa, S. Kimura, Y. Kasuya, T. Miyauchi, K. Goto, and T. Masaki. The human endothelin family: three structurally and pharmacologically distinct isopeptides predicted by three separate genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA  86:2863-2867 (1989)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Kloog, Y., I. Ambar, M. Sokolovsky, E. Kochva, Z. Wollberg, and A. Bdolah. Sarafotoxin, a novel vasoconstrictor peptide: phosphoinositide hydrolysis in rat heart and brain. Science (Washington D. C.)  242:268-270 (1988)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Huggins, J. P., J. T. Pelton, and R. C. Miller. The structure and specificity of endothelin receptors: their importance in physiology and medicine. Pharmacol. Ther.  59:55-123 (1993)[Medline].
5. Simonson, M. S. Endothelins: multifunctional renal peptides. Physiol. Rev.  73:375-411 (1993)[Free Full Text].
6. Masaki, T., M. Yanagisawa, and K. Goto. Physiology and pharmacology of endothelins. Med. Res. Rev.  12:391-421 (1992)[Medline].
7. Lysko, P. and P. Nambi. Endothelin receptors in neural systems. Methods Neurosci.  11:186-198 (1993).
8. Williams, D. L., Jr., K. L. Jones, D. J. Pettibone, E. V. Lis, and B. V. Clineschmidt. Sarafotoxin S6c: an agonist which distinguishes between endothelin receptor subtypes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.  175:556-561 (1991)[Medline].
9. Arai, H., S. Hori, T. Aramori, H. Ohkubo, and S. Nakanishi. Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor. Nature (Lond.)  348:730-732 (1990)[Medline].
10. Sakurai, T., M. Yanagisawa, Y. Takuwa, H. Miyazaki, S. Kimura, K. Goto, and T. Masaki. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature (Lond.)  348:732-735 (1990)[Medline].
11. Elshourbagy, N., D. R. Korman, H-L. Wu, D. R. Sylvester, J. A. Lee, P. Nuthulaganti, D. J. Bergsma, C. S. Kumar, and P. Nambi. Molecular characterization and regulation of the human endothelin receptors. J. Biol. Chem.  268:3873-3879 (1993)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Sogabe, K., H. Nirei, M. Shoube, A. Nomoto, S. Ao, Y. Notsu, and T. Ono. Pharmacological profile of FR139317, a novel, potent endothelin ETA receptor antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.  264:1040-1046 (1993)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Benigni, A., C. Zoja, D. Corna, S. Orisio, L. Longaretti, J. Bertani, and G. Remuzzi. A specific endothelin subtype A receptor antagonist protects against injury in renal disease progression. Kidney Int.  44:440-444 (1993)[Medline].
14. Kato, T., S. Kassab, F. C. Wilkins, Jr., K. A. Kirchner, J. Keiser, and J. P. Granger. Endothelin antagonists improve renal function in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension (Dallas)  25:883-887 (1995)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Clozel, M. and V. Beru. The role of ETB receptors in normotensive and hypertensive rats as revealed by the nonpeptide selective ETB receptor antagonist, Ro 46-8443. FEBS Lett.  383:42-45 (1996)[Medline].
16. Ihara, M., T. Fukuroda, T. Sacki, M. Nishikibe, K. Kojiri, H. Suda, and M. Yano. An endothelin receptor (ETA) antagonist isolated from Streptomyces misakiensis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.  178:132-137 (1991)[Medline].
17. Nakamichi, K., M. Ihara, M. Kobayashi, T. Sacki, K. Ishikawa, and M. Yano. Different distribution of endothelin receptor subtypes in pulmonary tissues revealed by the novel selective ligands, BQ123 and [Ala1,3,11,15] ET-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.  182:144-150 (1992)[Medline].
18. Nambi, P., H-L. Wu, M. Pullen, N. Aiyar, H. Bryan, and J. D. Elliott. Identification of endothelin receptor subtypes in rat kidney cortex using subtype-selective ligands. Mol. Pharmacol.  42:336-339 (1992)[Abstract].
19. Mino, N., M. Kobayashi, A. Nakajima, H. Amano, K. Shimamoto, K. Ishikawa, K. Watanabe, M. Nishikebe, M. Yano, and F. Ikemoto. Protective effect of a selective endothelin receptor antagonist BQ123, in ischemic acute renal failure in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol.  221:77-83 (1992)[Medline].
20. Gellai, M., M. Jugus, T. Fletcher, R. DeWolf, and P. Nambi. Reversal of postischemic ARF with a selective ETA receptor antagonist in the rat. J. Clin. Invest.  93:900-906 (1994).
21. Bonvallet, S. T., M. R. Zamora, K. Hasunuma, K. Sato, N. Hanasato, D. Anderson, K. Sato, and T. J. Stelzner. BQ123, an ETA receptor antagonist, attenuates hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in rats. Am. J. Physiol.  266:H1327-H1331 (1994)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. DeNucci, G., R. Thomas, P. D'Orleans-Juste, E. Antunes, C. Walder, T. D. Warner, and J. R. Vane. Pressor effects of circulating endothelin are limited by its removal in the pulmonary circulation and by the release of prostacyclic and endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA  85:9797-9800 (1988)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Harrison, V. J., A. Randriantsoa, and P. Schoeffer. Heterogeneity of endothelin-sarafotoxin receptors mediating contraction of pig coronary artery. Br. J. Pharmacol.  105:511-513 (1992)[Medline].
24. Hay, D. W. P. Pharmacological evidence for distinct endothelin receptors in guinea pig bronchus and aorta. Br. J. Pharmacol.  106:759-761 (1992)[Medline].
25. Warner, T. D., G. H. Allcock, R. Corder, and J. Wane. Use of the endothelin antagonists BQ123 and PD142893 to reveal three endothelin receptors mediating smooth muscle contraction and the release of EDRF. Br. J. Pharmacol.  110:777-782 (1993)[Medline].
26. Brooks, D. P., P. D. DePalma, M. Pullen, and P. Nambi. Characterization of canine renal endothelin receptors and their function. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.  268:1091-1097 (1994)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Nambi, P., M. Pullen, and G. Feuerstein. Identification of endothelin receptors in various regions of rat brain. Neuropeptides  16:195-199 (1990)[Medline].
28. Smith, D. L., X. Weilong, and R. L. Varnold. Oogenesis and oocyte isolation. Methods Cell Biol.  36:45-51 (1991)[Medline].
29. White, M. M., K. M. Mayne, H. A. Lester, and N. Davidson. Mouse-torpedo hybrid acetylcholine receptors: functional homology does not equal sequence homology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA  82:4852-4856 (1985)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Nambi, P., N. Elshourbagy, H-L. Wu, M. Pullen, E. Ohlstein, D. P. Brooks, A. Lago, J. D. Elliott, J. Gleason, and R. R. Ruffolo. Nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists I. Effects on binding and signal transduction on human endothelinA and endothelinB receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.  271:755-761 (1994)[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Tanaka, T., E. Tsukuda, M. Nozawa, H. Nonaka, T. Ohno, H. Kase, K. Yamada, and Y. Matsuda. RES701-1, a novel, potent endothelin type B receptor-selective antagonist of microbial origin. Mol. Pharmacol.  45:724-730 (1994)[Abstract].


Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. Perfume, S. L. Nabhen, K. Riquelme Barrera, M. G. Otero, L. G. Bianciotti, and M. S. Vatta
Long-term modulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity and expression by endothelin-1 and -3 in the rat anterior and posterior hypothalamus
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R905 - R914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, C.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics