![]() |
|
|
1 Subunit of
-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Influence Affinities for
Benzodiazepine Binding Site Ligands
Department of Pharmacology, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site allosterically modulate
-aminobutyric acidA receptors. Their binding pocket is made up of amino acid residues located on both
and
subunits. We
transiently expressed wild-type
1
2
2 and mutant
GABAA receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and
determined their binding properties. Receptors containing the mutant
Y209A showed ~40-fold decrease in affinity for
[3H]Ro 15-1788 and diazepam, whereas zolpidem displayed
no measurable affinity. Receptors containing the mutant
Y209F showed
a small-to-moderate decrease in affinity for [3H]Ro
15-1788, diazepam, zolpidem,
methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-
-carboline-3-carboxylate, and Cl
218872, amounting to 2-8-fold. Receptors containing the mutant
Y209Q appeared in the surface membrane of transfected cells, bound
[3H]muscimol with wild-type affinity, but failed to bind
[3H]Ro 15-1788 or [3H]flunitrazepam with
detectable affinity. If these mutant receptors were expressed in
Xenopus laevis oocytes, the apparent affinity for GABA
was only slightly decreased, whereas the ability of the currents to be
stimulated by low concentrations of flunitrazepam was abolished.
Receptors containing a point mutant of another amino acid residue,
T206A, surprisingly showed an increase in affinity of 5- and
16-fold, for the negative allosteric modulator methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-
-carboline-3-carboxylate and the partial positive allosteric modulator Cl 218872, respectively, whereas
there was only a small decrease in affinity for Ro 15-1788, diazepam,
and zolpidem, amounting to 2-, 4-, and 5-fold. Both
206 and
209
are thus both important in determining the binding affinities for
ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site. The residues are spaced at
an interval of three amino acids and may be part of an
helix.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The GABAA receptor is one of the major inhibitory neuronal ion channels in mammalian brain. Two subunits were initially purified (1), and their coding DNA was cloned (2). A total of 14 mammalian subunits were subsequently cloned (3) (see Refs. 4-8 for reviews). The subunits show homology to subunits of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, glycine receptor and serotonin3 receptor.
The GABAA receptor is also the site of binding of
benzodiazepines and related compounds (see Ref. 7 for review). Both the
and
subunits are important for interaction with the channel agonist GABA (9-11). In addition to the well established importance of
an
subunit, the presence of a
subunit is indispensable for
benzodiazepine stimulation of GABA-induced currents (12, 13). Three
amino acid residues in the
2 subunit affect benzodiazepine pharmacology (14-17). Both
and
subunits are thought to
contribute to the benzodiazepine binding site, but its localization
remains unknown.
We recently described three point mutations in
the
and
subunits that individually affect benzodiazepine
effects in GABAA receptors on expression in
Xenopus laevis oocytes (15). All of the mutated channels
respond ~3-fold to diazepam compared with the wild-type. Two point
mutations also result in channels with an enhanced response to
zolpidem, whereas the mutation in the
subunit results in a loss of
the zolpidem effect (15). The loss in sensitivity toward zolpidem is
accompanied by a loss in sensitivity toward alpidem, Cl 218872, and
zopiclone (16). Although the benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 can
counteract diazepam effects, zolpidem cannot, indicating that zolpidem
has lost its ability to interact with the receptor; direct binding
studies on GABAA receptors transfected in HEK 293 cells confirmed this (16). Interestingly, some of the amino acid
residues important for allosteric modulation by benzodiazepines are
directly homologous to amino acid residues on other subunits implicated
in the formation of the receptor agonist binding site.
In a previous functional study, the mutated amino acid Y209A of the
subunit gave varying results with different ligands of the
benzodiazepine binding site. Although there was a significant functional difference between wild-type channels and channels containing this mutated subunit toward 1 µM zolpidem,
this divergent behavior was not significant for 1 µM
diazepam. To decide whether this amino acid residue is important for
the binding of ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site, we
investigated the binding properties of the respective receptors after
transient expression in HEK 293 cells. We analyzed two additional point
mutants of this amino acid residue and the T206A mutant of the
subunit. Results obtained suggest involvement of both amino acid
residues
206 and
209 in the formation of the binding pocket for
ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site. The positional difference of the two residues is suggestive of an
helix.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transfection of recombinant GABAA receptors in
cultured cells.
The cDNAs coding for the
1,
2, and
2
subunits of the rat GABAA receptor channel and
the construction of point mutants have been previously described
(18-20). HEK 293 cells were maintained in minimum essential medium
(GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum,
2 mM glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml
streptomycin through standard cell culture techniques. Equal amounts
(total of 20 µg of DNA/90-mm dish) of GABA receptor subunits were
transfected into HEK 293 cells (American Type Culture Collection,
Rockville, MD) through the calcium phosphate precipitation method (21).
After overnight incubation, the cells were washed twice with serum-free
medium and fed again with medium.
Membrane preparation.
At ~60 hr after transfection, the
cells were harvested by washing with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline, pH 7.0, and centrifuged at 150 × g. Cells were
washed with buffer containing 10 mM K phosphate, 100 mM KCl, and 0.1 mM K-EDTA, pH 7.4. Cells were
homogenized through sonication in the presence of 10 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 mM EDTA. Membranes were
collected in three centrifugation-resuspension cycles (100,000 × g for 20 min), and then used for ligand binding or stored at
20°.
Binding assays. Resuspended cell membranes (0.5 ml) were incubated for 90 min on ice in the presence of [3H]muscimol (26 Ci/mmol), [3H]Ro 15-1788 (87 Ci/mmol), or [3H]flunitrazepam (86 Ci/mmol) (Dupont-New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) and various concentrations of competing ligands. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 25 µM unlabeled muscimol, Ro 15-1788, or flunitrazepam, respectively. Membranes (20-50 µg of protein/filter) were collected through rapid filtration on GF/C filters presoaked in 0.3% polyethyleneimine. After three washing steps with 4 ml of buffer, the filter-retained radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. On the basis of IC50 determinations, the Ki value was estimated according to the Cheng-Prusoff equation (22).
Detection of GABAA receptors on the surface of
living, transfected HEK 293 cells.
Culture medium was removed from
transfected cells. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against a
polypeptide representing amino acid residues 1-9 of the rat
GABAA receptor
1 subunit (5 µg/ml) (23, 24)
and dialyzed, tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-coupled swine
anti-rabbit IgG antibody (R 0156, 1:20; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) were
added in succession, each diluted in buffered saline and incubated for
45 min at room temperature. The cells were visualized using a Zeiss
Axiovert 35 fluorescence microscope equipped with a 63× objective or
on a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 100). Where indicated, cells were
fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde before immunostaining.
Detection of
1 GABAA receptor subunits on Western
blots.
Protein (15 µg) from transfected cells was subjected to
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking for 1 hr with 5% nonfat
dry milk/0.05% Tween-80, lanes were successively subjected for 3 hr to
5 µg/ml concentrations of the above-mentioned rabbit primary antibody
(25) and peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit IgG antibody (R-14745, 1:200, 1 hr; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY). Peroxidase activity was
visualized by the ECL reaction (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).
Expression and functional characterization.
X.
laevis oocytes were prepared, injected, and defolliculated, and
currents were recorded as previously described (13, 26). Briefly,
oocytes were injected with 50 nl of cRNA dissolved in 5 mM
K-HEPES, pH 6.8. This solution contained the transcripts coding for the
different subunits at a concentration of 10 nM for
1, 10 nM for
2, and 100 nM for
2 (calculated
from the UV absorption). Electrophysiological experiments were
performed by the two-electrode voltage-clamp method at a holding
potential of
80 mV. GABA dose-response curves were fitted using a
least-squares method (Gauss-Newton-Marquardt). The equation used was
I(c) = Imax
cn/(cn + Kan), where c is
the GABA concentration, I is the current elicited, Ka is the GABA concentration
eliciting half-maximal current amplitudes (50%
Imax), and n is the Hill coefficient.
Each of the curves was then standardized to Imax = 100%, and the averaged data were fitted again. Allosteric
potentiation via the benzodiazepine site was measured at a GABA
concentration eliciting 5-15% of the maximal GABA current amplitude
by application of GABA alone and coapplication of GABA with increasing
concentrations of flunitrazepam. GABA was applied for 20 sec, and a
washout period of 4 min was allowed to ensure full recovery from
desensitization. Stimulation of GABA currents was expressed in
percentage of the respective control current amplitudes and then
standardized, taking the stimulation by 1 µM
flunitrazepam of wild-type receptors (328%) as 100%. The perfusion
system was cleaned by washing with dimethylsulfoxide to avoid
contamination.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of wild-type and mutant receptors in HEK 293 cells.
Wild-type
1
2
2 (hereafter referred to as 

) were
mutated in the tyrosine residue
209 to alanine (
Y209A
),
phenylalanine (
Y209F
), or glutamine (
Y209Q
) or the
threonine residue
206 to alanine (
T206A
). Wild-type and
point mutant
Y209A
,
Y209F
,
Y209Q
, and
T206A
receptors were expressed by transient transfection in
HEK 293 cells. Expression was verified by measuring binding of
[3H]Ro 15-1788 to membrane fractions. On
coexpression with wild-type subunits to yield 

combinations,
the mutants
T206A and
Y209F each resulted in maximal
[3H]Ro 15-1788 binding comparable with wild-type
receptors, whereas
Y209A resulted in ~10% of the binding of
wild-type receptors.
Y209Q
receptors, no binding was detectable of
[3H]Ro 15-1788 or
[3H]flunitrazepam, and the ligand for the
agonist site of the receptor [3H]muscimol was
used. On coexpression with 
,
Y209Q resulted in maximal
[3H]muscimol binding approximately half that of
wild-type receptors (Fig. 1). Specific
binding of [3H]muscimol to
Y209Q
and
wild-type receptors showed a KD value of 14 ± 6 and 14 ± 5 nM, and a
maximal binding capacity of 0.74 ± 0.14 and 1.6 ± 0.6 pmol/mg of protein, respectively, showing that at least this mutation,
which destroyed the binding of two different radiolabeled ligands of
the benzodiazepine binding site, did not significantly affect agonist
binding affinity. In nontransfected cells, a very small endogenous
component of specific [3H]muscimol binding was
seen similar to that previously observed (27), but because of its small
size, it could not be properly quantified.
|
1 subunit was also verified on Western blot
analysis (25) for these subunit combinations. Although nontransfected cells did not result in a signal, wild-type and mutant
Y209Q
receptors resulted in a signal of comparable intensity (not shown).
Surface expression in living HEK 293 cells was followed for wild-type
receptors and
Y209A
and
Y209Q
mutant receptors. This
was achieved using fluorescent staining of GABAA
receptors on living cells with an
1-specific polyclonal antibody
(23, 24) recognizing an extracellular epitope followed by fluorescence microscopy. Although cells transfected with 
resulted only in very little autofluorescence (Fig. 2b),
cells transfected with wild-type receptors showed an intense
fluorescence organized in clusters at the surface membrane with little
background fluorescence in the cell interior (Fig. 2d). Cells
transfected with mutant
Y209Q
(Fig. 2f) displayed a surface
staining similar to wild-type receptors, and
Y209A
receptors
seemed to show slightly less fluorescence (not shown). The organization
of the fluorescence into clusters is induced by the polyclonal antibody
and lateral diffusion of the receptors during the incubation; a random
distribution was found in transfected cells that were first fixed and
then immunolabeled (Fig. 2j). Again, cells transfected with 
only did not show any specific fluorescence (Fig. 2h). The results demonstrate clearly that in these experiments, mutant subunits
Y209Q
reach the surface membrane to a similar extent as the wild-type subunits. Furthermore, these observations made with the
Y209Q
mutant parallel our observations in
[3H]muscimol binding measurements.
|
Binding properties of
Y209A
,
Y209F
, and
Y209Q
receptors.
In the previous functional study (15),
the mutated amino acid Y209A of the
subunit yielded similar but
somewhat differing behavior toward diazepam and zolpidem. Although
there was a significant difference between wild-type channels and
channels containing this mutation toward 1 µM zolpidem,
this difference was not significant for 1 µM diazepam;
therefore we investigated whether binding of ligands was affected.
|
|
subunit) led to a small decrease (2-8-fold) for [3H]Ro 15-1788, diazepam,
zolpidem, DMCM, and Cl 218872 (Table 1). The largest effect was seen on
DMCM (Fig. 4) binding, indicating that
this hydroxyl residue is important for interaction of the receptor with
this compound.
|
subunit was replaced by glutamine, the binding properties of the
benzodiazepine site were altered dramatically. Indeed, we first
analyzed for binding of [3H]Ro 15-1788 and
were unable to detect any specific binding. Before immunofluorescence,
Western blot experiments, and [3H]muscimol
binding, we interpreted this as a failure in the expression of the
mutant receptor.
When [3H]flunitrazepam was used for binding, a
saturable binding with a KD value of
43 ± 6 nM (two experiments) and a maximal specific binding capacity of ~400 fmol/mg of protein could be measured (not shown). Displacement studies with Ro 15-1788, zolpidem, DMCM, and diazepam were then carried out. An affinity of <30
µM was not detectable for Ro 15-1788,
zolpidem, DMCM, or Cl 218872, indicating that these ligands were unable
to displace [3H]flunitrazepam. These binding
properties are reminiscent of the [3H]flunitrazepam binding site endogenous to
HEK 293 cells (28). Fuchs et al. (28) reported an endogenous
binding component for [3H]flunitrazepam. They
found a specific binding of 20 ± 1 fmol/mg of protein at a 2 nM concentration. The
Kd value was estimated at >100
nM. If the value for specific binding is
extrapolated to 20 nM
[3H]flunitrazepam, binding amounts to ~200
fmol/mg of protein. Specific binding also could not be displaced by Ro
15-1788 or a
-carboline. We found that in the presence of 20 nM [3H]flunitrazepam,
~120 fmol/mg of protein was specifically bound to the membranes,
regardless of whether cells were untransfected or transfected with the
Y209Q mutant. Flunitrazepam therefore does not bind to expressed
receptors but rather to an unidentified endogenous binding site. As
shown above, measurement of [3H]muscimol
binding showed that the receptor was present and, remarkably, the
binding affinity for the receptor agonist muscimol was unaltered. Because [3H]muscimol was bound to
Y209Q
and the receptor appears on the cell surface, the
mutation Y209Q leads to an intact receptor but to the complete loss of
binding ability for the radiochemicals [3H]flunitrazepam and
[3H]Ro 15-1788.
Functional properties of
Y209Q
receptors.
Wild-type


and mutant
Y209Q
receptors were expressed in
X. laevis oocytes. The mutant receptor resulted in maximal
GABA current amplitudes approximately three times smaller than those of
wild-type receptors. The apparent affinities for GABA to activate ion
currents (Ka) were determined for
both types of receptor. Fig. 5,
top, shows that there is a small, nearly 2-fold reduction in
Ka value from 27 ± 4 (three
experiments) in wild-type to 48 ± 7 µM
(three experiments) in mutant receptors. Concentrations of
flunitrazepam of <30 nM failed in contrast to
wild-type receptors to significantly stimulate GABA-induced currents
(Fig. 5, bottom). Higher concentrations of flunitrazepam
resulted in a small current stimulation in mutant receptors, amounting
to <15% of the wild-type at 1 µM
flunitrazepam..
|
Binding properties of
T206A
receptors.
In
a previous functional study using receptors expressed in X. laevis oocytes and electrophysiological techniques (15), this
mutation resulted in channels displaying an enhanced response to
diazepam and zolpidem. It was therefore interesting to see how the
binding of ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site was affected.
This point mutation led to the expression of receptors displaying a
slightly reduced affinity for Ro 15-1788, diazepam, and zolpidem (2-, 4-, and 5-fold) (Table 1). Interestingly, the affinities for DMCM and
Cl 218872 were increased strongly, by 5- and 16-fold (Fig.
6), respectively, indicating that these
latter ligands can be better accommodated after the replacement of
threonine by alanine.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We attempted to further characterize the structural and functional properties of the binding site for benzodiazepine-site ligands. For this purpose, wild-type and mutant GABAA receptors were expressed in HEK 293 cells and X. laevis oocytes. Expression was verified by Western blot analysis, immunocytochemistry, radioligand binding, and electrophysiology.
Binding properties of wild-type and mutant
Y209A
,
Y209F
,
Y209Q
, and
T206A
receptors.
Wild-type and mutant GABAA receptors were
expressed by transient transfection in HEK 293 cells. The agonist
binding properties and those for allosteric modulators acting at the
benzodiazepine binding site were determined using
[3H]muscimol and [3H]Ro
15-1788, respectively. Although the first type of binding site was
unaltered, at least in the Y209Q mutant, the second type was profoundly
affected in its properties. Because the endogenous [3H]flunitrazepam binding site to HEK 293 cells
is unable to bind the antagonist Ro 15-1788, in all cases in which
experiments were based on [3H]Ro-15 1788 binding (i.e., all reported mutants mentioned in Table 1), this
endogenous site can be safely ignored. Both mutant receptors
T206A
and
Y209F
were affected up to 16-fold in their
binding properties. Interestingly, replacement of the threonine residue
in position 206 by alanine led to an increase in affinity for the
negative allosteric modulator DMCM and the partial positive allosteric
modulator Cl 218872, amounting to 5- and 16-fold, respectively. It
might be speculated that reduction in residue size leads to better
accommodation of these ligands in the binding pocket. The mutant
receptor
Y209A
showed reduced affinities of >40-fold for
several ligands. Reduction in size and loss of aromaticity of this
amino acid residue lead to the retention of some affinity (40-50-fold
reduction) for diazepam and Ro 15-1788, whereas any detectable
affinity for zolpidem, DMCM, and Cl 218872 is lost.
subunit by the
similar-sized, nonaromatic residue glutamine leads to the complete loss
of any detectable affinity for the two benzodiazepine ligands tested,
[3H]Ro 15-1788 and
[3H]flunitrazepam (Table 1). The binding
properties of the
Y209Q
receptor (i.e., normal presence of
agonist binding and absence of the benzodiazepine ligand binding site)
are reminiscent of dual subunit receptor 
, lacking the
subunit. Because benzodiazepine binding is still present in alanine and
phenylalanine mutants of the same residue but each expresses an altered
pharmacology, we believe this is an unlikely interpretation of our
results. Rather, we believe the binding site for these ligands is
compromised by the presence of the glutamine residue. Also, after
expression in X. laevis oocytes, the alanine mutant still
results in diazepam stimulation (15), which indicates the presence here
of a
subunit. In addition, we have shown using immunocytochemical
methods that the altered
subunit reaches the surface membrane in
living cells. Because the exclusive expression of
subunits results
in the very inefficient formation of homomeric channels (8, 29, 30),
the mutant
subunit is probably assembled together with other
subunits.
Relation between binding studies and receptor function.
Functional studies on receptors expressed in X. laevis
oocytes were previously been performed with the alanine mutants
T206A
and
Y209A
(15). The first mutant channel was
stimulated by diazepam and zolpidem to a significantly higher degree
than the wild-type channel. For the second mutant, diazepam resulted in a nonsignificantly reduced stimulation, and zolpidem resulted in a loss
of stimulation. For functional effects to occur, a substance must first
bind. The fact that diazepam and zolpidem result in differential
decreases in stimulation of the currents elicited in
Y209A
can
also be rationalized on the basis of the binding data, showing an
affinity of ~0.5 µM for diazepam and a very strongly reduced affinity for zolpidem. Thus, at the 1 µM
concentration used, these agents are expected to occupy their receptor
site to a degree of 67% and <4%, respectively.
Y209Q
showed a <2-fold reduction in the
apparent affinity for channel gating by GABA (Fig. 5, top), whereas any stimulation of the GABA-induced currents by flunitrazepam below a concentration of 30 nM was absent (Fig. 5, bottom).
This confirms our findings with the immunocytochemistry and binding studies of this receptor variant showing that the mutant receptor reaches the surface membrane and findings for binding properties in
transiently transfected 293 cells, with the binding site for [3H]muscimol unaltered and binding sites for
[3H]Ro 15-1788 and
[3H]flunitrazepam undetectable.
Spacing of mutations affecting the binding properties of ligands of
the benzodiazepine binding site.
The mutations described here
affect the two amino acid residues T206 and Y209 of the
subunit.
These residues are located three amino acids apart, which suggests that
this region of the
subunit might form an
helix. A Chou-Fasman
analysis (31) predicts for region 199-209 an
helix followed by a
sheet. Amino acid 206 is located in the center of a hydrophilic
region, and 209 is located at the interface of the latter and a
hydrophobic region. If the prediction of the secondary structure is
correct for this stretch of the
subunit and if amino acids altering the binding properties of ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site do
take part in the formation of the actual binding pocket, constraints
are imposed on the way in which the pocket is formed by the protein.
Homology of
206 and
209 with
202 and
205.
The two
residues described here that extensively affect binding of allosteric
modulators, Thr206 and Tyr209 on the
1 subunit, are directly
homologous to Thr202 and Tyr205 on the
2 subunit, as implicated in
the interaction with the channel agonist GABA (9). This indicates a
large degree of homology between the binding sites for channel agonists
and for channel modulators of the benzodiazepine type. During revision
of the current report, a study by Amin et al. (32), in which
the authors made a similar conclusion, came to our attention. Based on
functional studies in X. laevis oocytes and on binding
studies of the serine mutant of the tyrosine
209, it was concluded,
similar to the current report, that this amino acid residue may be
involved in binding of benzodiazepines.
Structure of the binding site.
The following amino acid
residues on the
1 subunit, or homologous residues on other
isoforms, and on the
2 subunit have been shown to affect functional
alterations to the response of ligands of the benzodiazepine binding
site:
Y159,
Y161,
T206,
Y209,
F77,
M130, and
T142
(14-17, 32, current report). The binding of these ligands is affected
by
H101,
Y159,
G200,
T206,
Y209,
F77, and
M130
(16, 17, 32-35; current report). These seven residues have been shown
to strongly affect the binding properties. Unless these amino acid
residues exert distal effects, they might take part in the formation of
the binding pocket for ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site.
These amino acid residues are located in five different areas of the
protein complex, which may be located next to each other. This means
that both the
subunit and the
subunit may contribute to the
formation of the binding site, each folding back after > 50 residues. The proper three-dimensional arrangement of these residues
remains to be established.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to Prof. H. Reuter, in whose institute this work
was carried out, for continuous encouragement; to Prof. W. Sieghart
(University of Vienna, Austria) for providing the
1 subunit-specific
antibody in the context of the collaboration funded by the European
Union; to Dr. K. Kannenberg for expert help with microscopic
techniques; and to Dr. V. Niggli for careful reading of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 21, 1997; Accepted June 20, 1997
This work was supported by Grant 31-37192.93 from the Swiss National Science Foundation, EU Grant BIO4-CT96-0585 (BWW 96.0010), and the Foundation for the Promotion of Scientific Research at the University of Bern.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Erwin Sigel, Department of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Friedbühlstr. 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail: sigel{at}pki.unibe.ch
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid;
DMCM, methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-
-carboline-3-carboxylate;
HEK, human
embryonic kidney.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Sigel, E.,
F. A. Stephenson,
C. Mamalaki, and
E. A. Barnard.
A -aminobutyric acid/benzodiazepine receptor complex of bovine cerebral cortex: purification and partial characterization.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:6965-6971 (1983) |
| 2. | Schofield, P. R., M. G. Darlison, N. Fujita, D. R. Burt, F. A. Stephenson, H. Rodriguez, L. M. Rhee, J. Ramachandran, V. Reale, T. A. Glencorse, P. H. Seeburg, and E. A. Barnard. Sequence and functional expression of the GABA-A receptor shows a ligand-gated receptor superfamily. Nature (Lond.) 328:221-227 (1987)[Medline]. |
| 3. | Davies, P. A., M. C. Hanna, T. G. Hales, and E. F. Kirkness. Insensitivity to anesthetic agents conferred by a class of GABAA receptor subunit. Nature (Lond.) 385:820-823 (1997)[Medline]. |
| 4. | Burt, D. R. and G. L. Kamatchi. GABAA receptor subtypes: from pharmacology to molecular biology. FASEB J. 5:2916-2923 (1991)[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Macdonald, R. L. and R. W. Olsen. GABAA receptor channels. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17:569-602 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 6. | Dunn, S. M. J., A. N. Bateson, and I. L. Martin. Molecular neurobiology of the GABAA receptor. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 36:51-96 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Sieghart, W.
Structure and pharmacology of -aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes.
Pharmacol. Rev.
47:181-233 (1995)[Medline].
|
| 8. | Rabow, L. E. Russek, S. J., and D. H. Farb. From ion currents to genomic analysis: recent advances in GABAA receptor research. Synapse 21:189-274 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 9. | Sigel, E., R. Baur, S. Kellenberger, and P. Malherbe. Point mutations affecting antagonist affinity and agonist dependent gating of GABAA receptor channels. EMBO J. 11:2017-2023 (1992)[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Amin, J. and
D. S. Weiss.
GABAA receptor needs two homologous domains of the -subunit for activation by GABA but not by pentobarbital.
Nature (Lond.)
366:565-569 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 11. |
Smith, G. B. and
R. W. Olsen.
Identification of a [3H]muscimol photoaffinity substrate in the bovine -aminobutyric acidA receptor -subunit.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:20380-20387 (1994) |
| 12. | Pritchett, D. B., H. Sontheimer, B. D. Shivers, S. Ymer, H. Kettenmann, P. R. Schofield, and P. H. Seeburg. Importance of a novel GABAA receptor subunit for benzodiazepine pharmacology. Nature (Lond.) 338:582-585 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 13. | Sigel, E., R. Baur, G. Trube, H. Möhler, and P. Malherbe. The effect of subunit composition of rat brain GABAA receptors on channel function. Neuron 5:703-711 (1990)[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Mihic, S. J.,
P. J. Whiting,
R. L. Klein,
K. A. Wafford, and
R. A. Harris.
A single amino acid of the human -aminobutyric acid type A receptor 2 subunit determines benzodiazepine efficacy.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:32768-32773 (1994) |
| 15. |
Buhr, A.,
R. Baur,
P. Malherbe, and
E. Sigel.
Point mutations of the 1 2 2 GABAA receptor affecting modulation of the channel by ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site.
Mol. Pharmacol.
49:1080-1084 (1996)[Abstract].
|
| 16. |
Buhr, A.,
R. Baur, and
E. Sigel.
Subtle changes in residue 77 of the subunit of 1 2 2 GABAA receptors drastically alter the affinity for ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11799-11804 (1997) |
| 17. |
Buhr, A. and
E. Sigel.
A point mutation in the subunit of 1 2 2 GABAA receptors alters specificity for ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:8824-8829 (1997) |
| 18. | Lolait, S. J., A.-M. O'Carroll, K. Kusano, J.-M. Muller, M. J. Brownstein, and L. C. Mahan. Cloning and expression of a novel rat GABAA receptor. FEBS Lett. 246:145-148 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Malherbe, P.,
A. Draguhn,
G. Multhaup,
K. Beyreuther, and
H. Möhler.
GABAA-receptor expressed from rat brain - and -subunit cDNAs display potentiation by benzodiazepine receptor ligands.
Mol. Brain Res.
8:199-208 (1990).
[Medline] |
| 20. |
Malherbe, P.,
E. Sigel,
R. Baur,
E. Persohn,
J. G. Richards, and
H. Möhler.
Functional characteristics and sites of gene expression of the 1 1 2-isoform of the rat GABAA receptor.
J. Neurosci.
10:2330-2337 (1990)[Abstract].
|
| 21. |
Chen, C. and
H. Okayama.
High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:2745-2752 (1987) |
| 22. | Cheng, Y. C. and W. H. Prusoff. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 22:3099-3108 (1973)[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Zimprich, F.,
J. Zezula,
W. Sieghart, and
H. Lassmann.
Immunohistochemical localization of the 1, 2 and 3 subunit of the GABAA receptor in the rat brain.
Neurosci. Lett.
127:125-128 (1991)[Medline].
|
| 24. |
Nusser, Z.,
J. B. D. Roberts,
A. Baude,
J. G. Richards,
W. Sieghart, and
P. Somogyi.
Immunocytochemical localization of the 1 and 2/3 subunits of the GABAA receptor in relation to specific GABAergic synapses in the dentate gyrus.
Eur. J. Neurosci.
7:630-642 (1995)[Medline].
|
| 25. | Zezula, J. and W. Sieghart. Isolation of type I and type II GABAA-benzodiazepine receptors by immunoaffinity chromatography. FEBS Lett. 284:15-18 (1991)[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Sigel, E.
Properties of single sodium channels translated by Xenopus oocytes after injection with messenger ribonucleic acid.
J. Physiol.
386:73-90 (1987).
|
| 27. |
Slany, A.,
J. Zezula,
V. Tretter, and
W. Sieghart.
Rat 3 subunits expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells form high affinity [35S]t-butylcyclophosphorothionate binding sites modulated by several allosteric ligands of -aminobutyric acid type A receptors.
Mol. Pharmacol.
48:385-391 (1995)[Abstract].
|
| 28. | Fuchs, K., J. Zezula, A. Slany, and W. Sieghart. Endogenous [3H]flunitrazepam binding in human embryonic kidney cell line 293. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 289:87-95 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 29. |
Blair, L. A.
Levitan, E. S., Marshall, J., Dionne, V. E., and E. A. Barnard. Single subunits of the GABAA receptor form ion channels with properties of the native receptor.
Science (Washington D. C.)
242:577-579 (1988) |
| 30. |
Pritchett, D. B.
Sontheimer, H., Gorman, C. M., Kettenmann, H., Seeburg, P. H., P. R. Schofield. Transient expression shows ligand gating and allosteric potentiation of GABAA receptor subunits.
Science (Washington D. C.)
242:1306-1308 (1988) |
| 31. | Chou, P. Y. and G. D. Fasman. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enzymol. 47:45-148 (1978). |
| 32. |
Amin, J.
Brooks-Kayal, A. R., and D. S. Weiss. Two tyrosine residues on the subunit are crucial for benzodiazepine binding and allosteric modulation of -aminobutyric acidA receptors.
Mol. Pharmacol.
51:833-841 (1997) |
| 33. |
Pritchett, D. B. and
P. H. Seeburg.
-Aminobutyric acid type A receptor point mutation increases the affinity of compounds for the benzodiazepine site.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1421-1425 (1991) |
| 34. |
Wieland, H. A.,
H. Lüddens, and
P. H. Seeburg.
A single histidine in GABAA receptors is essential for benzodiazepine agonist binding.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:1426-1429 (1992) |
| 35. | Korpi, E. R., C. Kleingoor, H. Kettenmann, and P. H. Seeburg. Benzodiazepine-induced motor impairment linked to point mutation in cerebellar GABAA receptor. Nature (Lond.) 361:356-359 (1993)[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Sancar, S. S. Ericksen, A. M. Kucken, J. A. Teissere, and C. Czajkowski Structural Determinants for High-Affinity Zolpidem Binding to GABA-A receptors Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 38 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xu, S. Fang, H. Shi, H. Li, Y. Deng, Y. Liao, J.-M. Wu, H. Zheng, H. Zhu, H.-M. Chen, et al. Topology characterization of a benzodiazepine-binding {beta}-rich domain of the GABAA receptor {alpha}1 subunit Protein Sci., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2622 - 2637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Baur and E. Sigel Benzodiazepines Affect Channel Opening of GABAA Receptors Induced by Either Agonist Binding Site Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1005 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Berezhnoy, Y. Nyfeler, A. Gonthier, H. Schwob, M. Goeldner, and E. Sigel On the Benzodiazepine Binding Pocket in GABAA Receptors J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3160 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Baumann, R. Baur, and E. Sigel Individual Properties of the Two Functional Agonist Sites in GABAA Receptors J. Neurosci., December 3, 2003; 23(35): 11158 - 11166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Kucken, J. A. Teissere, J. Seffinga-Clark, D. A. Wagner, and C. Czajkowski Structural Requirements for Imidazobenzodiazepine Binding to GABAA Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 289 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Sawyer, D. C. Chiara, R. W. Olsen, and J. B. Cohen Identification of the Bovine gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor alpha Subunit Residues Photolabeled by the Imidazobenzodiazepine [3H]Ro15-4513 J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 50036 - 50045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Baumann, R. Baur, and E. Sigel Forced Subunit Assembly in alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 GABAA Receptors. INSIGHT INTO THE ABSOLUTE ARRANGEMENT J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46020 - 46025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-A. Thompson, P. B. Wingrove, L. Connelly, P. J. Whiting, and K. A. Wafford Tracazolate Reveals a Novel Type of Allosteric Interaction with Recombinant gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2002; 61(4): 861 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||