![]() |
|
|
Departamentos de Química Biológica (G.P.V., C.P.L., M.D.G) and Química Orgánica (M.C.M., A.S.V., G.B.), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires and PRHOM-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (G.P.V., C.P.L., M.D.G.), Ciudad Universitaria, (1428) Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the rat, the conformationally highly bent steroid 21-hydroxy-6,19-oxidoprogesterone efficiently displaces [3H]corticosterone from thymus-glucocorticoid receptors and blocks type II receptors in kidney cytosols but competes with neither [3H]aldosterone for kidney-mineralocorticoid receptors nor [3H]progesterone for uterus-progesterone receptors. It evokes Na+ retention only at very high doses (~100 µg/100 g of rat weight) and is unable to induce tyrosine aminotransferase or to increase glycogen deposits in rat liver. When coincubated with corticosterone or dexamethasone, 2.5 µM 21OH-6OP inhibits 80% of tyrosine aminotransferase induction. It may therefore be used experimentally as an antiglucocorticoid virtually lacking mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid properties as well as affinity for mineralocorticoid or progesterone receptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The GR, cloned in 1985 (1), is a member of a protein super-family of closely related intracellular receptors that function as ligand-activated transcription factors (2). Steroid ligands that are able to activate GRs and to trigger a biological response exhibit a slightly torsioned steroid nucleus at the A/B-ring junction for optimal GC activity (3, 4). On the other hand, MC agonists require an overall flat conformation to acquire sodium-retaining activity (5). The MR, cloned by Arriza et al. (6) in 1987, have been shown to be highly homologous with GR. Because of that considerable homology, it was not too surprising that natural and even synthetic steroids exhibited cross-reaction between GR and MR. The PR is the third member of a subfamily of these highly related steroid receptors. Its natural ligand, P4, exhibits cross-reaction with both MR and GR.
Employing a systematic application of strategies to increase activity and decrease cross-reactivity and undesirable side effects, impressive progress has been reported in the development of new antihormonal agents with greater potency and selectivity, especially in the antiestrogen and antiandrogen fields (see Ref. 7 for a recent review).
The development of selective anticorticoids (of the spironolactone family, which are used in therapeutics) is more restricted. Those inhibitors seem to belong to the class of rapidly dissociating anti-MCs (7). Another synthetic steroid described as an anti-MC, ZK91587, shows specific binding properties for kidney (8) and hippocampus type I MR (9), but not for type II GR. It may therefore be conveniently used as a tool in the investigation of MR function in tissues containing both receptor systems.
A long-lasting search for a GC antagonist finally succeeded with the
development of the 11
-aminophenyl-substituted 19-norsteroid RU38486,
later shortened to RU486, in the early 1980s (10). It soon became
apparent, however, that this compound also possessed strong
antiprogestin activity, which led to its applications as a
contraceptive/contragestive agent (see Ref. 11 for a review). Avoiding
cross-reactions between GR and PR is still an unachieved goal for
pharmacologists.
The present work is the culmination of several studies on a novel synthetic steroid, 21OH-6OP, that suggest that this compound is a selective antiglucocorticoid that is unable to cross-react with uterus-PR or kidney-MR. The new structure has been developed as a result of our systematic studies on MC potencies on a series of 21-deoxysteroids, of which the highly bent 6OP (conformation of the skeleton is shown in Fig. 1) exhibited practically no Na+-retaining properties (5). Preliminary studies also showed lack of GC properties for this steroid. For the current work, we introduced a 21-hydroxyl group into its structure to ascertain the possibility of conferring GC or anti-GC properties to the 6,19-oxidopregnane skeleton.
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents. ALDO, corticosterone, P4, and DXM were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St.Louis, MO). 6OP and its 21-hydroxylated derivative 21OH-6OP (Fig. 1) were synthesized as described previously (Refs. 12 and 13, respectively). [3H]Corticosterone (specific activity, 80 Ci/mmol), [3H]ALDO (specific activity, 59 Ci/mmol), [3H]P4 (specific activity, 90 Ci/mmol), and [3H]ZK91587 (specific activity, 86.5 Ci/mmol) were purchased from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). RU28362 was a kind gift from Roussel-Uclaf (Romainville, France). All reagents used were of analytical grade.
Binding assays.
Adrenalectomized male Sprague-Dawley rats
were bled to death by heart puncture. Cold 0.9% NaCl was injected
profusely through the aorta until organs were completely blanched.
Thymuses were used as a source of GR and kidneys as a source of MR.
Homogenization and incubation conditions were performed as described
previously (Refs. 14 and 15, respectively). Briefly, homogenates
performed in cold TEGM buffer (0.1 M Tris·HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM Na2MoO4,
25% glycerol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2.0 TIU/ml aprotinin and 1 mg/100 ml leupeptin) at pH 7.4 were centrifuged
at 37,000 × g for 30 min at 0°. Supernatants from this centrifugation are referred to as "cytosol." Thymus or
kidney cytosols were incubated 12 hr at 0° in the presence of 5 nM [3H]corticosterone or
[3H]ALDO, and increasing amounts of unlabeled
steroids. [3H]P4 binding
to uterus PR was assayed on immature female rats according to the
method of Jordan et al. (16).
Bioassays. Liver glycogen deposition was measured on adrenalectomized male Sprague-Dawley rats (180-220 g) as follows: steroids were dissolved in ethanol/propylene glycol/0.9% NaCl solution (3:3:34) and 100 µg of steroid/100 g of body weight were injected intramuscularly on the previous night. On the morning of the experiment, this dose was reinjected intraperitoneally. Three hours later, the rats were killed by cervical dislocation and livers were removed immediately. Glycogen purification and quantification were carried out according to the method of Krisman (17). Na+-retaining properties were measured as described (5). TAT was induced in rat hepatocytes isolated by the procedure of Fry et al. (18). TAT activity was determined according to the method of Granner and Tomkins (19).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 2 shows the binding properties of 21OH-6OP to GR from rat thymus (Fig. 2A), CBG partially purified from rat plasma (Fig. 2B), and MR from rat kidney (Fig. 2C). We have included the displacement curve of 6OP for comparative purposes.
|
This steroid exhibits a moderate RBA for GR (Kd = 125 nM) and a low RBA for CBG (Kd = 1.27 µM). It does not compete efficiently with [3H]ALDO for MR, even when a thousandfold excess was added. The introduction of a functional hydroxyl group at 21 increased binding properties of 6OP to GR by more than 40-fold and binding to CBG by 100-fold. This introduction does not improve the binding of the 6,19-oxidopregnane skeleton to MR (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 3 shows biological properties using in vitro and in vivo methodologies. Compared with adrenalectomized controls, DXM or corticosterone produce 3-4-fold more liver glycogen deposits and increases TAT activity by a 5-6-fold. Despite the increase in RBA for GR, the 21-hydroxylation was unable to trigger GC responses. In effect, Fig. 3 shows that neither 6OP nor 21OH-6OP evoke these responses.
|
21OH-6OP is almost devoid of MC properties compared with the already weak Na+-retainer 6OP (Fig. 3C). Like other weak Na+ retainers, 6OP and 21OH-6OP exhibit a parabolic dose-response function with maxima of 40% retention for 21OH-6OP and 50% for 6OP at high doses, then lose activity at still higher doses (also see Ref. 5).
To study the binding of ALDO to kidney MR without the competitive influence of the relatively more abundant GR, we removed GR with the specific ligand RU28362 (7). This avoided the cross-reaction of ALDO with GR; hence, a two-slope Scatchard plot was created (20-22). Both situations can be seen in Fig. 4.
|
The presence of 1.0 µM RU28362 reduces the plot to a single line corresponding to type I sites, as does the selective ligand for MR, ZK91587. The calculated Kd for type I sites in different conditions ranges between 0.4 and 1 nM (Table 1), which is at least 80-fold higher than the affinity for type II sites. When we added the novel synthetic steroid 21OH-6OP to incubations performed in the presence of [3H]ALDO, a single binding site with kinetic parameters compatible with MR was again observed. This suggests that 2.5 µM 21OH-6OP is able to mask the cross-reaction of [3H]ALDO with GR. Hill coefficients (nH) calculated for each condition suggest a lack of allosteric interactions (Table 1).
|
In agreement with these binding properties, an antagonistic effect of
21OH-6OP against GC could be expected. Indeed, Fig. 5 shows that the novel pregnanesteroid
antagonizes TAT induction by corticosterone and dexamethasone. The
basal TAT activity in hepatocytes (Fig 5, control) was
measured by adding vehicle (final concentration, 0.2% ethanol)
to the culture. Neither 6OP nor 21OH-6OP facilitate TAT induction (
)
but 100 nM corticosterone (
) and 100 nM DXM
(
) stimulate enzyme activity 5-6-fold. 6OP (2.5 µM) does not affect this stimulation. However, 2.5 µM
21OH-6OP inhibits 80% of TAT induction when coincubated with
corticosterone or DXM.
|
Fig. 6 shows that 21OH-6OP displaces
[3H]P4 from uterus
receptors as weakly as the negative control 17
-estradiol
(E2). Unlabeled P4,
in contrast, was able to displace the tracer efficiently.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data presented in this article demonstrate that 21OH-6OP may be a useful tool for studying steroid-receptor interactions in systems in which more than one type of receptor is present. The RBA for GR refers to the mean affinity of [3H] corticosterone in thymus cytosols (125 nM). In spite of this moderate affinity, 21OH-6OP showed no ability to interact with MR or PR. It was also able to block type II receptors in kidney cytosols, where GR coexists not only with MR but also with a high level of CBG of dual origin [an unavoidable contamination by plasma (22, 23) and biosynthesis by the kidney (24)]. Fig. 2B indicates that 2.5 µM 21OH-6OP can simultaneously block almost 60% of the CBG binding sites. Fig. 2A shows only 75% of tracer displacement instead of the 95% saturation predicted according to mass action, perhaps because the CBG of dual origin was acting as a competitor for GR. (22, 23).
The induction of TAT activity in hepatocytes, triggered by both corticosterone and DXM, could be significantly inhibited by 21OH-6OP, indicating that this novel steroid may be a potential GC antagonist. Because it does not cross-react with PR (Fig. 6), the oxidopregnanesteroid could be interesting as a potential specific GR blocking agent. To our knowledge, a pure anti-GC has still not been developed. In effect, most of the antiprogestins and antiglucocorticoids available cross-react with other receptors (7).
One may imagine a number of possible mechanisms by which an antihormone may interfere with the agonist; the most common is interference with steroid binding by direct or indirect (allosteric) inhibition. However, recent findings relevant for the comprehension of receptor activation advise caution. Thus, dopamine and epidermal growth factor can affect the transformation of native hormone receptors to their active forms even though they do not seem to bind to the receptor (25). It was also suggested (26) that the insertion of the steroid between DNA strands plays an important role in transactivation. We are performing preliminary studies that suggest a competitive mechanism against glucocorticoid binding. However, there is no reason to believe that the antihormone binds to a given site similarly to the agonist. Because the binding is only the first event in a very sophisticated and still unclear cascade leading receptors to act as transcription factors, we still cannot speculate on a given molecular mechanism of action for 21OH-6OP.
In conclusion, this work indicates that 21OH-6OP binds almost exclusively to type II receptors but lacks biological activity and antagonizes GC responses. It may therefore be conveniently used as a tool for studying steroid-receptor interactions. The fact that 21OH-6OP, in contrast to other known antisteroids, is virtually devoid of affinity for MR and PR suggests some advantages for in vitro and even in vivo studies.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Argentina) and Universidad de Buenos Aires for financial support. We also are indebted to Mr. Rubén Di Paola and Mrs. María E. Otero for technical assistance.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 18, 1997; Accepted April 24, 1997
1 Current affiliation: Department of Pharmacology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0632
Send reprint requests to: Dr. G. P. Vicent, Departamento de Química Biológica, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón 2.-1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: gvicent{at}qb.fcen.uba.ar
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GR, glucocorticoid receptor; GC, glucocorticoid; MC, mineralocorticoid; MR, mineralocorticoid receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; P4, progesterone; 21OH-6OP, 21-hydroxy-6,19-oxidoprogesterone; 6OP, 6,19-oxidoprogesterone; ALDO, aldosterone; DXM, dexamethasone; TEGM, Tris/EDTA/glycerol/mercaptoethanol; CBG, transcortin; RBA, relative binding affinity; TAT, tyrosine aminotransferase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hollemberg, S. M., C. Weinberger, E. S. Ong, G. Cereli, A. Oro, R. Lebo, E. B. Thompson, M. G. Rosenfeld, and R. M. Evans. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature (Lond.) 318:635-641 (1985)[Medline]. |
| 2. | Forman, B. M. and R. M. Evans. Nuclear hormone receptors activate direct, inverted, and everted repeats. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 761:29-37 (1995)[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Lantos, C. P., G. Burton, A. Roldán, M. C. Damasco, and A. Aragonés. Structure-activity relationship in certain glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, in Physiopathology of Endocrine Diseases and Mechanisms of Hormone Action (R. J. Soto, A. de Nicola and J. Blaquier, eds.). Alan R. Liss, New York, 477-494 (1981). |
| 4. | Duax, W. L., V. Cody, J. F. Griffin, D. C. Rohrer, and C. M. Weeks. Molecular conformation and protein binding affinity of progestins. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 4:205-227 (1978)[Medline]. |
| 5. | Burton, G., M. D. Galigniana, S. de Lavallaz, A. L. Brachet-Cota, E. M. Sproviero, A. A. Ghini, C. P. Lantos, and M. C. Damasco. Sodium-retaining activity of some natural and synthetic 21-deoxysteroids. Mol. Pharmacol. 47:535-543 (1995)[Abstract]. |
| 6. |
Arriza, J.,
C. Weinberg,
G. Cerelli,
T. Glaser,
B. Handelin,
D. Housman, and
R. Evans.
Cloning of human mineralocorticoid receptor complementary DNA: structural and functional kinship with the glucocorticoid receptor.
Science (Washington D. C.)
237:268-275 (1987) |
| 7. | Teutsch, G., F. Nique, G. Lemoine, F. Bouchoux, E. Cérède, D. Gofflo, and D. Philibert. General structure-activity correlations of antihormones. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 761:5-28 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 8. | Grill, H. J., K. Nickisch, P. E. Schulze, H. Laurent, W. Elger, A. Heubner, and K. Pollow. 3H-ZK91587: a new synthetic, highly specific ligand for mineralocorticoid receptor determination. J. Steroid Biochem. 23(suppl): 19S (1985). |
| 9. | Sutanto, W. and E. R. de Kloet. ZK91587: a novel synthetic antimineralocorticoid displays high affinity for corticosterone (Type I) receptors in the rat hippocampus. Life Sci 43:1537-1543 (1988)[Medline]. |
| 10. | Antiprogestins/antiglucocorticoids, in Endocrinology at Roussel-Udaf. 64 (1993). |
| 11. |
Spitz, I. M. and
C. W. Bardin.
Mefiprestone (RU486): a modulator of progestin and glucocorticoid action.
N. Engl. J. Med.
329:404-412 (1993) |
| 12. | Brachet-Cota, A. L. and G. Burton. An improved preparation of 11,19-oxidopregn-4-ene-3,20-dione and 6,19-oxidopregnan-4-ene-3,11,20-trione. Z. Naturforsch. Teil B Anorg. Chem. Org. Chem. 45:711-715 (1990). |
| 13. | Veleiro, A. S., M. V. Nevado, M. C. Monteserín, and G. Burton. Syntheses of 21-hydroxy-11,19-oxidopregn-4-ene-3,20-dione and 21-hydroxy-6,19-oxidopregn-4-ene-3,20-dione. Steroids 60:268-271 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Galigniana, M. D.,
G. P. Vicent,
G. Burton, and
C. P. Lantos.
Features of the shuttle pair 11 -hydroxyprogesterone/11-ketoprogesterone.
Steroids
62:358-364 (1997)[Medline].
|
| 15. | Galigniana, M. D. Stability study on renal type I mineralocorticoid receptor. Life Sci. 59:511-521 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 16. | Jordan, V. C. and C. J. Dix. Effect of oestradiol benzoate, tamoxifen and monohydroxytamoxifen on immature rat uterine progesterone receptor synthesis and endometrial cell division. J Steroid Biochem. 11:285-291 (1979)[Medline]. |
| 17. | Krisman, C. A method for the colorimetric estimation of glycogen with iodine. Anal. Biochem. 4:17-23 (1962). |
| 18. | Fry, J., C. Jones, P. Webkin, and J. Bridges. The enzymatic isolation of adult rat hepatocytes in a functional and viable state. Anal. Biochem. 71:341-350 (1976)[Medline]. |
| 19. | Granner, D. and G. Tomkins. Metabolism of amino acids and amines: tyrosine amino-transferase. Methods Enzymol. 17:633-637 (1975). |
| 20. | Gomez-Sanchez, C. E. and E. P. Gomez-Sanchez. RU26988: a new tool for the study of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology 113:1004-1009 (1983)[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Funder, J. W. Glucocorticoid receptors. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43:389-394 (1992)[Medline]. |
| 22. | Galigniana, M. D., G. P. Vicent, C. P. Lantos, and G. Burton. Ligand properties of 11,19-oxidoprogesterone: a preliminary report. Ann. Assoc. Química Argentina 81:333-340 (1993). |
| 23. |
Krozowski, Z. S. and
J. F. Funder.
Renal mineralocorticoid receptors and hippocampal corticosterone binding species have identical intrinsic steroid specificity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:6056-6060 (1983) |
| 24. | Kraujelis, K., A. Ulinskaite, and V. Meilus. Transcortin in rat kidney: subcellular distribution of transcortin-synthesizing polyribosomes. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38:43-47 (1991)[Medline]. |
| 25. | Jensen, E. V. Steroid hormone antagonists: an overview. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 761:1-4 (1995). |
| 26. | Hendry, L. B., C. K. Chu, M. L. Rosser, J. A. Copland, J. C. Wood, and V. B. Mahesh. Design of novel antiestrogens. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 49:269-280 (1994)[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhang, F. T F Tsai, and D. S Geller Differential interaction of RU486 with the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors. J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 37(1): 163 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Patel, J. W. Funder, and J. R. G. Challis Mechanism of Cortisol/Progesterone Antagonism in the Regulation of 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Activity and Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels in Human Chorion and Placental Trophoblast Cells at Term J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2922 - 2933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Galigniana, G. P. Vicent, G. Piwien-Pilipuk, G. Burton, and C. P. Lantos Mechanism of Action of the Potent Sodium-Retaining Steroid 11,19-Oxidoprogesterone Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2000; 58(1): 58 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||