|
|
|
|
Vol. 52, Issue 6, 1041-1055, 1997
Laboratories of Molecular Pharmacology (N.N., S.S., Y.P.) and Medicinal Chemistry (H.H., G.W.A.M.), Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A four-point pharmacophore was constructed from energy-minimized structures of chicoric acid and dicaffeoylquinic acid. The search of 206,876 structures in the National Cancer Institute 3D database yielded 179 compounds that contain this pharmacophore. Thirty-nine of these compounds were tested in an in vitro assay specific for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase (IN). Each retrieved structure was fit to the pharmacophore, and the conformation that afforded the best fit was identified. Twenty of the 39 compounds tested exhibited IC50 values of <20 µM. Among the most potent inhibitors, tetracyclines emerged as a new class of inhibitors. Although the parent tetracycline exhibited marginal potency against purified IN, all substituted tetracyclines tested showed 5-100-fold increased potency. Disintegration assays with truncated IN mutants indicated that tetracyclines inhibit the IN catalytic core domain. To investigate whether chelation of divalent metals is implicated in differential potency of tetracyclines, enzyme assays were performed in the presence of both Mn2+ or Mg2+; no significance difference in potency was observed. Rolitetracycline inhibited IN/DNA complex formation in the presence of EDTA, which suggests that inhibition was metal independent. Rolitetracycline reversed DNA binding of IN after the complex was allowed to form before the addition of drug. Selectivity of tetracyclines was also examined in an assay specific for topoisomerase I, and none of the tetracyclines tested induced topoisomerase I-mediated cleavable complex or inhibited camptothecin-induced cleavable complex. Remarkable potency against the IN in the absence of divalent metals and the core enzyme coupled with water solubility makes tetracyclines potential candidates for X-ray crystal structure determination with IN.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several classes of inhibitors of HIV-1 IN have been reported (for recent reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). Among these inhibitors, hydroxylated aromatics, which are present in a variety of natural products, have consistently exhibited remarkable potency in in vitro assays specific for IN. Although they are from a variety of unrelated families, the majority of these inhibitors share a common structural feature of two aryl units separated by a central linker (examples are shown in Fig. 1). The recurring requirement of a catechol moiety is a common theme among hydroxylated aromatic inhibitors of IN. Catechols, however, do not have desirable properties in the cell-based assay against HIV-1 infection; many of them retain high cytotoxicity. Oxidation of catechol units in situ to quinones may contribute to their cytotoxicity. Recent reports by Robinson et al. (3, 4) indicate that the caffeoylquinic acids and chicoric acid, both of which contain two catechol moieties, exhibit remarkable antiviral activity with high potency against IN.
|
Several other studies on the antiviral activity and cytotoxicity of
chicoric acids have appeared since the isolation and synthesis of the
parent compound were first reported by Scarpati and Oriente (5). For
example, chicoric acid and caffeic acid reduced infectivity of
vesicular stomatitis virus in mouse L-929 cells only after infection
with vesicular stomatitis virus (6). These compounds provide no
prophylactic properties; no antiviral effects were observed when L-929
cells were treated before vesicular stomatitis virus infection (6). A
variety of polyhydroxylated carboxylic acids have been reported to
inhibit HIV-1 replication, perhaps through interaction with gp120 and
prevention of virus binding to the CD4 receptor.
For example, Mahmood et al. (7) reported that
4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid interacts irreversibly with gp120. Moreover, galloylquinic acids were reported to possess biological activities that included inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and human DNA polymerases
,
, and
(8).
Other biological properties of plant polyphenols include anticarcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, immune-stimulating, antiallergic, and ostrogenic effects and inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase, lipoxygenase, and phospholipase A (9). Plant polyphenols are in general multifunctional and can act as reducing agents, hydrogen-donating antioxidants, metal chelators, and singlet-oxygen quenchers (9).
In our search for novel IN inhibitors, we have identified many hydroxylated aromatic inhibitors of IN (1, 2). Although they are in general cytotoxic or inactive against HIV-1 replication in cell-based assays, their use as lead compounds for the design of noncatechol-containing inhibitors has been indispensable, and their contribution to our structure-activity studies has helped to elucidate the structural requirement for cytotoxicity and activity. We previously identified a series of novel inhibitors of IN based on three-point pharmacophores that were used in searches of the National Cancer Institute 3D database to identify numerous IN inhibitors (10-12). Evidence was obtained that suggested that some of these three-point pharmacophores were in fact part of a four-point pharmacophore; we have now extended those studies to characterize such a pharmacophore. This pharmacophore has been built from the low energy conformations of chicoric acid and caffeoylquinic acids, and its use in a search of the National Cancer Institute 3D database yielded several novel inhibitors; among them, a series of tetracyclines were identified as potent inhibitors and studied further to characterize their molecular interaction with IN.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals.
Tetracycline, oxytetracycline, doxycycline,
methacycline, and rolitetracycline were obtained from Sigma Chemical
(St. Louis, MO). All of the other compounds used in this study were
obtained from the National Cancer Institute chemical repository through the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch (Bethesda, MD). All compounds were dissolved in DMSO, and the stock solutions were stored at
20°.
Preparation of oligonucleotide substrates.
The high
performance liquid chromatography-purified oligonucleotides AE117,
5
-ACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACAC-3
; AE118, 5
-GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCAGT-3
; AE157, 5
-GAAAGCGACCGCGCC-3
; AE146,
5
-GGACGCCATAGCCCCGGCGCGGTCGCTTTC-3
; AE156,
5
-GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCAGGGGCTATGGCGTCC-3
; RM22M,
5
-TACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACAC-3
; and RMAB2,
5
-GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCUGT-3
were purchased from Midland Certified
Reagent Company (Midland, TX). Purified recombinant IN deletion mutant
IN50-212, expression system for the wild-type IN
and the IN50-212 (F185K), were generous gifts of
Drs. T. Jenkins and R. Craigie (Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). To analyze the extents of
3
-processing and strand transfer using 5
-end-labeled substrates,
AE118 was 5
-end labeled using T4 polynucleotide
kinase (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and [
-32P]ATP (DuPont-New England Nuclear,
Boston, MA). To determine the extent of 30-mer target strand generation
during disintegration, AE157 was 5
-end labeled and annealed to AE156,
AE146, and AE117. The kinase was heat inactivated, and AE117 was added
to the same final concentration. The mixture was heated at 95°,
allowed to cool slowly to room temperature, and run through a G-25
Sephadex quick-spin column (Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals,
Indianapolis, IN) to separate annealed double-stranded oligonucleotide
from unincorporated label.
-end-labeled
substrate by IN, AE118 was 3
-end labeled using
[
-32P]cordycepin triphosphate (DuPont-New
England Nuclear) and terminal transferase (Boehringer-Mannheim
Biochemicals). The transferase was heat inactivated, and RM22M was
added to the same final concentration. The mixture was heated at 95°,
allowed to cool slowly to room temperature, and analyzed on a G-25
Sephadex quick-spin column as before.
To determine the extent of Schiff base formation (13), RMAB2 was 5
-end
labeled and allowed to react with AE117 as described above. The uracil
was removed from duplex oligonucleotides that contained deoxyuridine by
incubation of 40 µl of end-labeled DNA (500 nM stock
solution) with 1 unit of uracil DNA glycosylase (Life Technologies,
Grand Island, NY) for 90 min at 30°. The reaction was then loaded
onto a G-25 Sephadex quick-spin column to remove the unincorporated
label and the uracil.
IN assays.
To determine the extent of 3
-processing and
strand transfer, IN was preincubated at a final concentration of 200 nM with the inhibitor in reaction buffer [containing 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 µM EDTA, 50 µM dithiothreitol, 10%
glycerol (w/v), 7.5 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10%
DMSO, and 25 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic
acid, pH 7.2] at 30° for 30 min (14). Then, 20 nM of the
5
-end 32P-labeled linear oligonucleotide
substrate was added, and incubation was continued for an additional
hour. Reactions were quenched by the addition of an equal volume (16 µl) of loading dye (98% deionized formamide, 10 mM EDTA,
0.025% xylene cyanol, 0.025% bromphenol blue). An aliquot (5 µl)
was electrophoresed on a denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gel (0.09 M Tris-borate, pH 8.3, 2 mM EDTA, 20%
acrylamide, 8 M urea).
(D
C)/(N
C)], where
C, N, and D are the fractions of
21-mer substrate converted to 19-mer (3
-processing product) or strand
transfer products for DNA alone, DNA plus IN, and IN plus drug,
respectively. All IC50 values were determined by
plotting the drug concentration versus percent inhibition and determining the concentration that produced 50% inhibition.
To determine the effects of drugs on the choice of nucleophile in the
3
-processing, reactions were performed essentially as described above
with a 3
-end-labeled oligonucleotide (15). Disintegration reactions
were performed as above with a Y oligonucleotide (i.e., the branched
substrate in which the U5 end was "integrated" into target DNA)
(16).
DNA binding assay using Schiff base formation. This assay was described in detail recently (13). Briefly, IN (200 nM) was preincubated with the inhibitor (at the indicated concentration) for 30 min at 30°. Subsequently, an oligonucleotide that contained an abasic site (13) (see Fig. 9A) in reaction buffer (described above) was added for 2 min at room temperature. A freshly prepared solution of sodium borohydride (0.1 M final concentration) was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 2 min. An equal volume (16 µl) of 2× SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 4% 2-mercaptoethanol, 4% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 20% glycerol) was added to each reaction, and the reaction was heated at 95° for 3 min before loading a 20-µl aliquot onto a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel was run at 120 V for 1.5 hr, dried, and exposed in a PhosphorImager cassette. Gels were analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.
|
Topoisomerase reactions.
Reactions were performed in 10 µl
of reaction buffer (0.01 M Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2,
0.1 mM EDTA, 15 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) with the
following duplex oligonucleotide substrate (17) labeled with
-32P-cordycepin at the 3
-end of the upper
strand (*): 5
-GATCTAAAAGACTT GGAAAAATTTTTAAAAAA*ATTTTCTGAA-CCTTTTTAAAAATTTTTTCTAG-5
. This oligonucleotide contains a single topoisomerase I cleavage site (caret
in upper strand). Approximately 50 fmol of oligonucleotide/reaction was
incubated with 10 units of calf thymus DNA topoisomerase I (GIBCO BRL).
Reactions were stopped by the addition of SDS (0.5% final
concentration). Proteolysis was halted by the addition of 36 µl
of 2.5× loading buffer (98% formamide, 0.01 M EDTA, 1 mg/ml xylene cyanol, 1 mg/ml bromphenol blue). An aliquot (5 µl) was electrophoresed on a denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gel (0.09 M Tris-borate, pH 8.3, 2 mM EDTA, 20%
acrylamide, 8 M urea).
National Cancer Institute 3D database and search software.
The National Cancer Institute 3D database and the Chem-X program used
in both 3D database build and search processes have been described
previously (18-20). The current version of the National Cancer
Institute 3D database consists of 206,876 open and 201,036 discrete
(proprietary) structures, for a total of 407,912 structures. All
searches reported in this article were conducted only within the open
part of the database. The conformational flexible search algorithm
implemented in Chem-X (July 1994 version; Chemical Design, Oxford, UK)
running on a Silicon Graphics IRIS Indigo workstation (Mountain View,
CA) was used. For flexible compounds, multiple conformations are
generated and analyzed during both building and searching of the
database. A pharmacophore in this study refers to the 3D arrangement of
those atoms in a compound that is responsible for the biological
activity of the compound. Three-dimensional database pharmacophore
searching facilitates identification of molecules that meet the
requirements specified in the pharmacophore query. This approach has
gained attention recently for its use in the discovery of new leads in
drug development programs, and we have built a searchable 3D database
(18) with a total of
407,000 structures from the two-dimensional
structures of the National Cancer Institute Drug Information System
database (19) using the program Chem-X. Use of 3D database searching
has enabled us to identify a number of novel protein kinase C agonists
(21), as well as HIV-1 protease (22) and IN inhibitors (10-12).
Molecular modeling.
All molecular modeling studies were
performed with the QUANTA 4.0/CHARMm 22 (Molecular Simulations,
Burlington, MA) molecular modeling package running on a Silicon
Graphics IRIS Indigo workstation. Energy minimization was typically
computed with 5000 iterations or until convergence (defined as an
energy gradient of
0.001 Kcal/mol/Å), using an Adjusted Basis
Newton-Raphson algorithm as implemented in CHARMm. The structures of
compounds were built using the ChemNote module with QUANTA and were
energy-minimized using CHARMm. Conformational searches were conducted
using the Monte Carlo random search algorithm implemented in QUANTA.
| |
Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of a unique four-point pharmacophore.
Recently,
we reported the identification of two distinct three-point
pharmacophores among a series of lichen acids (10). Searches of the
National Cancer Institute 3D database with these pharmacophores yielded
800 compounds that contained either of these pharmacophores; the
dicaffeoylquinic acids were identified in this way as potent inhibitors
of IN. Robinson et al. (3, 4) reported anti-HIV-1 activity
for the caffeoylquinic class of compounds. To determine the
biologically active conformation of 1-MO-3,5-DCQA, 3,5-DCQA, and
L-chicoric acid, 5000 conformations were generated in each
case with the use of a random sample generator in QUANTA. Each of the
conformations was minimized with the Adjusted Basis Newton-Raphson
algorithm in CHARMm (23) using 5000 iterations or until convergence
defined as an energy gradient of 0.001 Kcal/mol/Å. The unique
four-point pharmacophore was identified in each case from analysis of
the low energy (
E < 4.7 Kcal/mol) conformations of these three
compounds. The pharmacophore query shown in Fig. 2 was built from the 3D structures of
1-MO-3,5-DCQA, 3,5-DCQA, and L-chicoric acid, whose
structures are shown in Fig. 1. These compounds possess the three-point
pharmacophores defined previously (10-12); it was envisaged that
four-point pharmacophores should be both more precise and more
specific. Compounds that contained a four-point pharmacophore should
bind more effectively than those with only a three-point pharmacophore.
The pattern of six distances in a four-point pharmacophore is more
stringent than that of the three distances in a three-point
pharmacophore, and fewer hits should be expected in a search. Molecular
modeling studies of 1-MO-3,5-DCQA, 3,5-DCQA, and L-chicoric
acid enabled us to identify the novel four-point pharmacophore shown in
Fig. 2. These three IN inhibitors fit this four-point pharmacophore in
low energy conformations (
E = 1.25, 4.37, and 4.67 Kcal/mol,
respectively), and the superimposition on one another of the four-point
pharmacophores in the best-fit conformations of these inhibitors, a
view of which is shown in Fig. 3, gave
RMS values of 0.334, 0.209, and 0.055Å. From this four-point
pharmacophore, we can generate four independent three-point
pharmacophores with distance patterns: 9.5, 8.6, and 2.6 Å; 11.5, 9.5, and 2.6 Å; 10.5, 8.6, and 2.6 Å; and 11.5, 10.5, and 2.6 Å.
|
|
3D database search. The four-point pharmacophore was used in a search of the National Cancer Institute 3D database. The distance tolerances in the pharmacophore query were set to 0.7 Å, as shown in Fig. 2. Every atom in the pharmacophore was allowed to be either oxygen or an amino nitrogen. The 3D database search of 206,876 structures yielded a total of 179 compounds that contain this four-point pharmacophore distance pattern in one or more of their conformations. Thirty-nine compounds (Fig. 4) were manually selected for bioassay based on considerations of structural diversity and sample availability, with the most probable four-point pharmacophore centers identified. It is important to note that several of the compounds selected by the four-point pharmacophore presented in this study would also fit the previously described three-point pharmacophore. However, the three-point pharmacophore in general yielded a higher number of hits. On the other hand, the four-point pharmacophore yielded a greater number of active inhibitors (see below).
|
Influence of conformational energy penalty and geometric fitness. All 39 compounds were initially tested in the IN assay at 100 µg/ml (Table 1). Compounds with inhibitory potency >50% were further assayed at different concentrations to determine their IC50 values. Twenty (51%) exhibited IC50 values of <20 µM and 24 (62%) exhibited IC50 values at <100 µM (Table 1), which suggests that the pharmacophore query used for searching is effective in identifying active compounds. However, 15 of the compounds were inactive (IC50 > 100 µM), so the four-point pharmacophore query defined in Fig. 2 seems to be necessary but not sufficient to determine effective binding of the ligand to IN. Other factors such as hydrophobicity and molecular shape effects could be responsible for the biological inactivity of compounds that contain the pharmacophore. Two factors that contribute to the structure-activity relationships are the conformational energy penalty and the geometric fitness of the pharmacophore in the ligand binding conformation. The larger the conformational energy penalty, the more difficult it will be for the inhibitor to adopt the desired conformation and less precise its binding will be to the enzyme. The better the enzyme-ligand fit, the more potent is the inhibitor.
|
E) between this conformation
and the global minimum is also given. The conformational energy penalty
and RMS value should both influence the potency of an inhibitor; these
two factors are represented in the following equation: F = (
E1
E2)(RMS),
where F represents the relation between inhibitor activity and the
conformational energy penalty and geometric fit. The
E1 refers to the energy difference between the
lowest energy conformer and the superimposition conformer of the
indicated compounds onto the four-point pharmacophore. The
E2 represents a hypothetical energy penalty
related to the conformational change and is derived from the analysis
of small molecule/protein complexes; this value is assigned as
7
Kcal/mol (24) in the above equation. RMS refers to RMS of
superimposition of the indicated compound onto a four-point
pharmacophore. This arbitrary equation provides the plot shown in Fig.
5, in which it can be seen that small F
values denote a better geometric fit (i.e., smaller RMS) and/or a low
conformational energy penalty, both of which are compatible with
increased potency of the inhibitor. Fig. 5 shows that this device
serves to distinguish the 24 active compounds
(IC50 < 100 µM) from the 15 less
active compounds and provides qualitative support for the importance of
both conformational energy and geometric fit. However, no linear
relationship was established between F and the
IC50 value. This is reasonable because conformational energy penalty and geometric fitness of a pharmacophore in binding conformation are only two of the factors that influence the
activity of an inhibitor; other properties, such as hydrophobicity and
steric and electronic factors, also should be considered for each
inhibitor.
|
Selection of compounds that contain the four-point pharmacophore. Structures of the 39 four-point pharmacophore-containing compounds assayed in this study are shown in Fig. 4. The pharmacophore query was built on the basis of the hydrogen bond donating capabilities of the inhibitors because in many cases, the hydrogen bond interaction provides a major contribution to the overall free energy of binding. Because a basic nitrogen may be capable of behaving as either a hydrogen bond donor or acceptor, a basic nitrogen atom was allowed in place of oxygen in the search, and several of the retrieved compounds (e.g., 6, 8, 12, 13, 15, 19, 21-24, and 25-39) contain at least one basic nitrogen atom in the pharmacophore assembly.
In vitro inhibition of HIV-1 IN.
Catechol-containing compounds in general are potent inhibitors of IN
in vitro (1). In many instances, this inhibition is associated with nonspecific binding to other cellular targets. Thus,
collateral toxicity associated with this class of inhibitors is of
major concern in anti-HIV drug development. We have used 3D database
searching of the National Cancer Institute drug screening program to
identify novel inhibitors of IN and identified novel non-catechol-containing inhibitors (1), some of which are presented in
this study. Several of the inhibitors reported are analogs of compounds
reported previously; for example, we identified a series of flavones as
inhibitors of IN (25). Novel flavones, such as the dihydrochalcone
derivative 1 and the phylloflavan 3, inhibited IN
<2 µM. In common with the chicoric and caffeoylquinic
acids, compounds 1-3 contain two catechol moieties. All of
the catechol-containing compounds exhibited similar potency as those
for the chicoric and caffeoylquinic acids, apparently regardless of the
linker length and linker geometry. Compound 11, with two
seven-membered rings, also exhibited remarkable potency, with
IC50 values of 1.4 and 2.3 µM for
3
-processing and strand transfer, respectively. However, when the OH
groups are protected, as in compounds 9, 10, and
20, total loss of activity was observed (Table 1). These
results are in accord with our recent investigation of a series of
monohydroxylated arylamide inhibitors of IN (26). Derivatization of a
hydroxyl group in a series of catechol-containing inhibitors abolished anti-IN activities (26), and the implication is that a hydrogen bond
donor (---OH) is necessary at these positions: a hydrogen bond acceptor
(---O---) is inadequate. Anthracycline antibiotics 22 and
23 exhibited IC50 values of 1.4 ± 0.4 and 2.3 ± 0.8 µM for 3
-processing and
1.5 ± 0.7 and 4.1 ± 2.0 µM for strand transfer, respectively. In accord with our earlier observations (27),
several other anthracyclines also showed similar potency range (data
not shown). N-Caffeoylglycine-L-phenylalanine
(6), with IC50 values of 104.4 ± 21.3 µM for 3
-processing and 32.0 ± 17.7 µM for strand transfer, was moderately active. The
disulfides 7 and 8 exhibited moderate activity,
whereas the sulfonylamides 14 and 15 were less
active.
-processing, respectively. In the tetracycline
series of compounds, the parent tetracycline 25, with
IC50 values of 204.0 ± 37.4 and 188.0 ± 30.8 µM for 3
-processing and strand transfer,
exhibited marginal potency against IN. However, pyrrolidinyl methyl
substitution at carboxamide group to protect the free amine increased
the potency 5-fold. This increase in potency was seen in all other
substituted tetracyclines, 27-39. Thus, tetracyclines
27-39 were equally potent, with an
IC50 range of 1.0-5.0 µM for both
3
-processing and strand transfer. The tetracyclines presented in this
study are a new class of IN inhibitors and were examined further in
different assays to probe the site and specificity of their inhibitory
action.
Relevance to antiviral activity. We based our study on the caffeoylquinic and chicoric acids that had been reported to exhibit antiviral activity with high potency against IN (3, 4). Interestingly, none of the caffeoylquinic acids tested in the National Cancer Institute Antiviral Drug Screening Program exhibited detectable activity against HIV-1-infected CEM cells (10). In addition, none of the tested compounds presented in Table 1 exhibited significant antiviral activity. Compounds 13-17, 21, 34, and 39 showed remarkable cytotoxicity. Interestingly, several of the tetracyclines were noncytotoxic, which suggests that they are devoid of nonspecific cellular effects. Further rational drug design requires synthesis of derivatives that would be more stable by modifying the R group (Fig. 4) to prevent intracellular cleavage, leading to the parent tetracycline, which has only marginal potency against IN.
Although some hydroxylated aromatics may have antiviral activities, their in vivo selectivity against IN remains to be established. However, there is increasing evidence for their nonselective binding to other targets. For example, in a recent study, Natarajan et al. (28) showed that caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potent and specific inhibitor of nuclear factor-
B
activation induced by different agents (28). Moreover, NDGA and
3-O-methyl-NDGA were reported to inhibit HIV-1 transcription
and replication by inhibiting HIV-1 Tat function (29). In our in
vitro assay, NDGA also exhibited moderate potency against purified
IN.1 A recent report by Baxter
et al. (30) indicates that multiple interactions between
polyphenols and a salivary proline-rich protein repeat resulted in
complexation and precipitation. Thus, the propensity to form
nonspecific complexes with proteins, DNA, and polysaccharides remains a
major concern in the development of polyphenolic-based inhibitors. This
lack of specificity in combination with poor cellular uptake translates
into poor antiviral activity in cell-based assays. Nevertheless, the
use of potent inhibitors as drug lead is of major impetus in
development of a more selective inhibitor.
Mechanism of IN inhibition by tetracyclines.
On infection of
cells, effective retroviral replication requires the integration of a
double-stranded DNA copy of the viral single-stranded RNA genome into a
host chromosome. HIV-1 IN is known to catalyze two consecutive
reactions. Initially, it processes linear viral DNA by removing the
nucleotides 3
from the conserved CA, leaving the recessed 3
-OH
termini. Subsequently, the processed 3
-ends of the viral DNA are then
covalently joined to host DNA (1, 31, 32). These two steps, known
respectively as 3
-processing and DNA strand transfer, can be readily
measured in an in vitro assay using purified recombinant IN,
a 21-mer duplex oligonucleotide that corresponds to the U5 end of the
HIV long terminal repeat sequence (Fig.
6A) and divalent metal ion
(Mn2+ or Mg2+). Fig. 6B
shows a representative gel that illustrates inhibition of both
3
-processing and strand transfer reactions by tetracyclines 29, 28, 26, and 25. The
substituted tetracyclines 26, 28, and
29 were 5-100-fold more potent than the parent compound
25. When we examined the inhibition of 3
-processing and
strand transfer in the presence of Mg2+, no
significant differences in IC50 values were
observed from those in the presence of Mn2+ (not
shown). The IC50 values for 3
-processing and
strand transfer, respectively, were 2.7 and 2.4 µM for
29, 3.2 and 3.1 µM for 28, 49.8 and
43.2 µM for 26, and 341.0 and 333.0 µM for 25.
|
-processing reaction involves hydrolysis of a single
phosphodiester bond 3
of the conserved CA-3
dinucleotide. However, in
addition to this hydrolysis reaction, retroviral integrases can use
glycerol or the hydroxyl group of the viral DNA terminus as the
nucleophile in the 3
-processing reaction, which yields a glycerol
esterified to the 5
-phosphate, or a circular dinucleotide or
trinucleotide, respectively (33-35) (Fig. 6A). To examine the effect
of several inhibitors on the choice of nucleophiles in the
3
-processing reaction, a substrate DNA labeled at the 3
-end was used
(34). Tetracyclines 29, 28, 26, and
25 inhibited glycerolysis, hydrolysis, and circular nucleotide formation (Fig. 7B) to
essentially the same extent, consistent with the data shown in Fig. 6B.
|
-processing and strand transfer reactions
described above, IN can catalyze reversal of strand transfer, which
leads to the "disintegration" step shown in Fig.
8A (16). One of the interesting aspect of
the disintegration reaction is that an IN deletion mutant
IN50-212 lacking both the amino-terminal zinc
binding and the carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domains remains active in
this assay, whereas such truncated IN loses activity in the
3
-processing and strand transfer assays (16). Thus, the disintegration
assay can be used to probe the site of drug-enzyme binding. We have
used two core mutants, IN50-212 wild-type or a
soluble IN50-212 (F185K) mutant (36), in this
assay and a Y oligonucleotide that mimics a strand-transfer product
(Fig. 8A). As shown in Fig. 8B, tetracyclines 25,
26, and 28 inhibited disintegration by
IN50-212 (F185K) with IC50
values of 197, 36.9, and 29.7 µM, respectively, which
implies that the IN core domain is sufficient for inhibition and that
binding of tetracyclines to the IN core region is responsible for IN
inhibition.
|
-processing and strand transfer,
respectively, whereas rolitetracycline (26), with
IC50 values of 28.0 ± 22.5 and 34.1 ± 13.3 µM for 3
-processing and strand transfer,
respectively, was 5 times more potent than the parent compound (Table
1). An even further increase in potency is observed as the bulk of the
substituent on the carboxamide moiety at C2 increases. Three other
commercially available tetracycline analogs that contain the free
carboxamide group (oxytetracycline, doxycycline, and methacycline) were
also tested in our IN inhibition assay and found to exhibit potencies in the same range as the tetracycline 25 (data not shown). The obvious difference was the presence of a protecting group on the
carboxamide group. Whether these subtle differences could play a major
contribution to metal binding is not clear; however, there are
precedents for differential metal binding characteristics of
tetracycline in solution (38, 39).
To determine the role of metal binding and potentially explain the
difference in IC50 values of tetracycline and
rolitetracycline, we examined the effect of DNA binding by IN in the
presence of divalent metal (Mn2+ or
Mg2+) or in the absence of metal in the presence
of EDTA. Using a recently described assay (13) to trap the IN on a DNA
substrate that contains an abasic site, we demonstrated that
rolitetracycline (26) inhibits IN-DNA binding and that this
inhibition is metal independent. The tetracycline 25 was
markedly less potent inhibitor of IN binding to DNA (Fig.
9), which is consistent with the greater
activity of rolitetracycline (26) over tetracycline
(25) in the 3
-processing, strand transfer, and
disintegration assays described above. We also found that rolitetracycline inhibited the IN50-212 core
binding to DNA, which is consistent with the results of functional
assays (Figs. 6, 7, 8) and indicates that tetracyclines act on the IN
catalytic core. Together, these results indicate that tetracyclines
inhibit IN, presumably by acting on the IN catalytic core domain.
Results of IN-DNA binding experiments suggest that this effect does not
require Mn2+ or Mg2+
cofactor.
It has been established that IN rapidly forms a stable complex with its
DNA substrate and that this complex has not been shown to reverse with
any of the known inhibitors. Interestingly, rolitetracycline (26) was able to displace DNA from the IN after the complex was allowed to form 5 min before the addition of the drug (Fig. 10, postincubation). However,
15-fold
more drug was required for 50% inhibition. When drug was incubated 30 min before the addition of DNA (Fig. 10, preincubation), an
IC50 value of 37 µM was obtained. Accordingly, a higher concentration of rolitetracycline (26) was required to inhibit DNA binding using
IN50-212 (F185K) mutant (data not shown).
Nevertheless, to inhibit all three IN enzymatic activities, only
37
µM was required to achieve 50% inhibition (Figs. 6B, 7B,
and 8B).
|
Tetracyclines do not affect eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I. Eukaryotic topoisomerase I assays can be used to probe the selectivity of compounds toward other DNA binding proteins. To determine the extent of topoisomerase I cleavable complex formation and inhibition of cleavable complex trapped by camptothecin, a 33-mer oligonucleotide bearing a unique topoisomerase I cleavage site in its center was used (17). and formation of the cleavable complex was monitored. None of the four tetracyclines (29, 28, 26, and 25) tested induced any detectable cleavable complex (data not shown) or inhibited the ability of topoisomerase I to generate camptothecin-mediated cleavable complex at concentrations that effectively inhibited IN (Fig. 11). These results indicate that the tested compounds exhibit some selectivity for IN and suggest that their inhibitory potency is not due to nonspecific binding to the IN or the DNA. Compounds 29, 28, and 26 exhibited no significant inhibition at the highest concentration tested, and tetracycline 25 showed an IC50 value of 400 µM against topoisomerase I (Fig. 11).
|
-processing and
strand transfer, respectively, were 4.4 and 3.8 µM for
29, 4.3 and 4.2 µM for 28, 10.4 and
9.3 µM for 26, and 227.0 and 243.0 µM for 25.
Tetracycline as lead compounds. A unique class of compounds identified in this study are the tetracyclines 25-39, which inhibited IN at low micromolar concentrations. Tetracyclines reported in this study are water soluble and potential candidates for cocrystallization with wild-type IN. In addition, tetracyclines are strong chelating agents and therefore of interest in elucidating the role of metal ions in the mechanism of IN function. It is puzzling why the prototype tetracycline with no substituent on the carboxamide group at the 2 position is considerably less potent than the carboxamido protected derivatives. This disparity is perhaps partially due to the nature of chelating properties of the tetracyclines. Alternatively, substituted tetracyclines could undergo intramolecular rearrangement on the side group (R group in Fig. 4) to release reactive electrophiles at the IN catalytic site. Although all the structures presented in this study contain the four-point pharmacophores, which can reasonably be superimposed on one another, the requirement for potency against IN is stringent, and subtle changes in structure can greatly affect their potency. Therefore, a more precise pharmacophore determination may have to await X-ray or NMR structural information. We are currently engaged in determining the cocrystal structure of several of the water-soluble inhibitors with HIV-1 IN.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 10, 1997; Accepted September 2, 1997
1 N. Neamati and Y. Pommier, unpublished observations.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Yves Pommier, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Division of Basic Sciences, NCI/NIH, Bldg. 37, Room 5DO2, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: pommier{at}nih.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; IN, integrase; RMS, root-mean-square; DCQA, dicaffeoylquinic acid; 1-MO-3, 5-DCQA, 1-methoxyoxalyl-3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; NDGA, nordihydroguaiaretic acid; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; 3D, three-dimensional.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Pommier, Y., A. Pilon, K. Bajaj, A. Mazumder, and N. Neamati. HIV-1 integrase as a target for antiviral drugs. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 8:483-503 (1997). |
| 2. | Neamati, N., S. Sunder, and Y. Pommier. Design and discovery of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. Drug Discovery Today 2:487-498 (1997). |
| 3. | Robinson, W. E., Jr., M. Cordeiro, S. Abdel-Malek, Q. Jia, S. A. Chow, M. G. Reinecke, and W. M. Mitchell. Dicaffeoylquinic acid inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus integrase: inhibition of the core catalytic domain of human immunodeficiency virus integrase. Mol. Pharmacol. 50:846-855 (1996)[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Robinson, W. E., Jr.,
M. G. Reinecke,
S. Abdel-Malek,
Q. Jia, and
S. A. Chow.
Inhibitors of HIV-1 replication that inhibit HIV integrase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:6326-3631 (1996) |
| 5. | Scarpati, M. L. and G. Oriente. Chicoric acid (dicaffeyltartic acid): its isolation from chicory (Chicorium intybus) and synthesis. Tetrahedron 4:43-48 (1958). |
| 6. | Cheminat, A., R. Zawatzky, H. Becker, and R. Brouillard. Caffeoyl conjugates from echinacea species: structures and biological activity. Phytochemistry 27:2782-2794 (1988). |
| 7. | Mahmood, N., P. S. Moore, N. De Tommasi, F. De Simone, S. Colman, A. J. Hay, and C. Pizza. Inhibition of HIV infection by caffeoylquinic acid derivatives. Antiviral. Chem. Chemother. 4:235-240 (1993). |
| 8. | Parker, W. B., M. Nishizawa, M. H. Fisher, N. Ye, K.-H. Lee, and Y.-C. Cheng. Characterization of a novel inhibitor of human DNA polymerases: 3,4,5-tri-O- galloylquinic acid. Biochem. Pharmacol. 38:3759-3765 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 9. | Rice-Evans, C. Plant polyphenols: free radical scavenger or chain-breaking antioxidants? Biochem. Soc. Symp. 61:103-116 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 10. | Neamati, N., H. Hong, A. Mazumder, S. Wang, S. Sunder, M. C. Nicklaus, G. W. A. Milne, B. Proksa, and Y. Pommier. Depsides and depsidones as inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase: discovery of novel inhibitors through 3D database searching. J. Med. Chem. 40:942-951 (1997)[Medline]. |
| 11. | Nicklaus, M. C., N. Neamati, H. Hong, A. Mazumder, S. Sunder, J. Chen, G. W. A. Milne, and Y. Pommier. HIV-1 integrase pharmacophore: discovery of inhibitors through 3D database searching. J. Med. Chem. 40:920-929 (1997)[Medline]. |
| 12. | Hong, H., N. Neamati, S. Wang, M. C. Nicklaus, A. Mazumder, Y. Pommier, H. Zhao, J. T. R. Burke, and G. W. A. Milne. Discovery of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors by pharmacophore searching. J. Med. Chem. 40:930-936 (1997)[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Mazumder, A.,
N. Neamati,
A. A. Pilon,
S. Sunder, and
Y. Pommier.
Chemical trapping of ternary complexes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase, divalent metal, and DNA substrates containing an abasic site: implications for the role of lysine 136 in DNA binding.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:27330-27338 (1996) |
| 14. | Mazumder, A., N. Neamati, S. Sunder, J. Owen, and Y. Pommier. Retroviral integrase: a novel target in antiviral development; basic in vitro assays with the purified enzyme, in Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology: Antiviral Evaluation (D. Kinchington and R. Schinazi, eds.). The Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, in press. |
| 15. | Mazumder, A., N. Neamati, J. P. Sommadossi, G. Gosselin, R. F. Schinazi, J. L. Imbach, and Y. Pommier. Effects of nucleotide analogues on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase. Mol. Pharmacol. 49:621-8 (1996)[Abstract]. |
| 16. |
Chow, S. A.,
K. A. Vincent,
V. Ellison, and
P. O. Brown.
Reversal of integration and DNA splicing mediated by integrase of human immunodeficiency virus.
Science (Washington D. C.)
255:723-726 (1992) |
| 17. |
Pommier, Y.,
G. Kohlhagen,
K. W. Kohn,
F. Leteurtre,
M. C. Wani, and
M. E. Wall.
Interaction of an alkylating camptothecin derivative with a DNA base at topoisomerase 1-DNA cleavage sites.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:8861-8865 (1995) |
| 18. | Milne, G. W. A., M. C. Nicklaus, J. S. Driscoll, S. Wang, and D. W. Zaharevitz. The NCI drug information system 3D database. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34:1219-1224 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 19. | Milne, G. W. A. and J. A. Miller. The NCI drug information system. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 26:154-197 (1986)[Medline]. |
| 20. | Milne, G. W. A., S. Wang, and M. C. Nicklaus. Molecular modeling in the discovery of drug leads. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36:726-730 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 21. | Wang, S., D. W. Zaharevitz, R. Sharma, V. E. Marquez, N. E. Lewin, L. Du, P. M. Blumberg, and G. W. A. Milne. The discovery of novel, structurally diverse protein kinase C agonists through computer 3D-database search: molecular modeling studies. J. Med. Chem. 37:4479-4489 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 22. | Wang, S., G. W. A. Milne, X. Yan, I. Posey, M. C. Nicklaus, L. Graham, and W. G. Rice. Discovery of novel, non-peptide HIV-1 protease inhibitors by pharmacophore searching. J. Med. Chem. 39:2047-2054 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 23. | Brooks, B. R., R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus. CHARMm: a program for macromolecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4:187-217 (1983). |
| 24. | Nicklaus, M. C., S. Wang, J. S. Driscoll, and G. W. A. Milne. Conformational changes of small molecules binding to proteins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 3:411-428 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 25. | Fesen, M. R., Y. Pommier, F. Leteurtre, S. Hiroguchi, J. Yung, and K. W. Kohn. Inhibition of HIV-1 integrase by flavones, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) and related compounds. Biochem. Pharmacol. 48:595-608 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 26. | Zhao, H., N. Neamati, A. Mazumder, S. Sunder, Y. Pommier, and T. R. Burke, Jr. Arylamide inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase. J. Med. Chem. 40:1186-1194 (1997)[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Fesen, M. R.,
K. W. Kohn,
F. Leteurtre, and
Y. Pommier.
Inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus integrase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2399-403 (1993) |
| 28. |
Natarajan, K.,
S. Singh,
T. R. Burke,
D. Grunberger, and
B. B. Aggarwal.
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potent and specific inhibitor of activation of nuclear transcription factor NF- B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:9090-9095 (1996) |
| 29. |
Gnabre, J. N.,
J. N. Brady,
D. J. Clanton,
Y. Ito,
J. Dittmer,
R. B. Bates, and
R. C. C. Huang.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription and replication by DNA sequence-selective plant lignans.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11239-11243 (1995) |
| 30. | Baxter, N. J., T. H. Lilley, E. Haslam, and M. P. Williamson. Multiple interaction between polyphenols and a salivary proline-rich protein repeat results in complexation and precipitation. Bichemistry 36:5566-5577 (1997). |
| 31. | Rice, P., R. Craigie, and D. R. Davies. Retroviral integrases and their cousins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:76-83 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 32. | Katz, R. A. and A. M. Skalka. The retroviral enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:133-173 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 33. | Engelman, A., K. Mizuuchi, and R. Craigie. HIV-1 DNA integration: mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer. Cell 67:1211-1221 (1991)[Medline]. |
| 34. | Mazumder, A., S. Wang, N. Neamati, M. Nicklaus, S. Sunder, J. Chen, G. W. Milne, W. G. Rice, T. R. Burke, Jr., and Y. Pommier. Antiretroviral agents as inhibitors of both human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase and protease. J. Med. Chem. 39:2472-2481 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 35. |
Vink, C.,
E. Yeheskiely,
G. A. van der Marel,
J. H. van Boom, and
R. H. Plasterk.
Site-specific hydrolysis and alcoholysis of human immunodeficiency virus DNA termini mediated by the viral integrase protein.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:6691-6698 (1991) |
| 36. |
Jenkins, T. M.,
A. B. Hickman,
F. Dyda,
R. Ghirlando,
D. R. Davies, and
R. Craigie.
Catalytic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase: identification of a soluble mutant by systematic replacement of hydrophobic residues.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:6057-6061 (1995) |
| 37. | Bujacz, G., M. Jaskolski, J. Alexandratos, A. Wlodawer, G. Merkel, R. A. Katz, and A. M. Skalka. The catalytic domain of avian sarcoma virus integrase: conformation of the active-site residues in the presence of divalent cations. Structure 4:89-96 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 38. | Gulbis, J., J. Everett, and G. W. Metal. binding characteristics of tetracycline derivatives in DMSO solution. Tetrahedron 32:913-917 (1976). |
| 39. | Williamson, D. E. and J. Everett, G. W.. A proton nuclear magnetic resonance study of the site of metal binding in tetracycline. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97:2397-2405 (1975)[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Semenova, A. A. Johnson, C. Marchand, D. A. Davis, R. Yarchoan, and Y. Pommier Preferential Inhibition of the Magnesium-Dependent Strand Transfer Reaction of HIV-1 Integrase by {alpha}-Hydroxytropolones Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1454 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Johnson, W. Santos, G. C. G. Pais, C. Marchand, R. Amin, T. R. Burke Jr., G. Verdine, and Y. Pommier Integration Requires a Specific Interaction of the Donor DNA Terminal 5'-Cytosine with Glutamine 148 of the HIV-1 Integrase Flexible Loop J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 461 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. John, T. M. Fletcher III, and C. B. Jonsson Development and Application of a High-Throughput Screening Assay for HIV-1 Integrase Enzyme Activities J Biomol Screen, September 1, 2005; 10(6): 606 - 614. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Plasencia, R. Dayam, Q. Wang, J. Pinski, T. R. Burke Jr., D. I. Quinn, and N. Neamati Discovery and preclinical evaluation of a novel class of small-molecule compounds in hormone-dependent and -independent cancer cell lines Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2005; 4(7): 1105 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Turner Echinacea for the Common Cold: Can Alternative Medicine Be Evidence-Based Medicine? Ann Intern Med, December 17, 2002; 137(12): 1001 - 1002. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Turner, D. K. Riker, and J. D. Gangemi Ineffectiveness of Echinacea for Prevention of Experimental Rhinovirus Colds Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2000; 44(6): 1708 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zhu, M. L. Cordeiro, J. Atienza, W. E. Robinson Jr., and S. A. Chow Irreversible Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase by Dicaffeoylquinic Acids J. Virol., April 1, 1999; 73(4): 3309 - 3316. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. King and W. E. Robinson Jr. Resistance to the Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Compound L-Chicoric Acid Results from a Single Mutation at Amino Acid 140 of Integrase J. Virol., October 1, 1998; 72(10): 8420 - 8424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Neamati, A. Mazumder, S. Sunder, J. M. Owen, M. Tandon, J. W. Lown, and Y. Pommier Highly Potent Synthetic Polyamides, Bisdistamycins, and Lexitropsins as Inhibitors of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 1998; 54(2): 280 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||