MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conroy, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conroy, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.

Vol. 53, Issue 3, 392-401, March 1998

Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes in the Developing Chick Brain: Appearance of a Species Containing the alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 Gene Products

William G. Conroy and Darwin K. Berg

Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California 92093-0357

    Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Increasing evidence suggests nicotinic receptors regulate developmental events in the nervous system. We used [3H]epibatidine and 125I-alpha -bungarotoxin, together with subunit-specific monoclonal antibodies, to distinguish and quantify nicotinic receptor subtypes in developing chick brain. The results show that more than three fourths of the epibatidine-binding receptors at both early and late embryonic stages contain alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits, representing receptors previously distinguished by high affinity nicotine binding. A fraction of these also contain the alpha 5 gene product, which is consistent with studies on transfected cells showing that the alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 gene products coassemble to produce epibatidine-binding receptors. A small portion of the receptors contain alpha 3 and beta 4 subunits, assembled in part with either alpha 4 or beta 2 subunits. The most abundant nicotinic receptors, however, at both early and late embryonic stages are those having high affinity for alpha -bungarotoxin rather than epibatidine. Most contain alpha 7 subunits, whereas about half contain alpha 8 subunits as well. The sharpest developmental increase between embryonic days 8 and 17/18 occurs with receptors containing alpha 5 subunits, whereas receptors containing alpha 3 or beta 4 subunits undergo no specific increase. The three major receptor species (containing alpha 4 and beta 2 but not alpha 5 subunits; alpha 7 subunits; or alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunits) each increase approx 3-fold during the same period. The results indicate greater receptor complexity than appreciated previously; they provide information about the rules governing subunit assembly in neuronal nicotinic receptors and draw attention to the role of alpha 5 subunits in late development.

    Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

AChRs in the vertebrate nervous system are ligand-gated ion channels that depolarize neurons by permitting cations to flow across the plasma membrane. Like their counterparts in vertebrate skeletal muscle, the receptors are thought to be pentameric transmembrane proteins encoded by one or more members of a multigene family (Karlin and Akabas, 1996). It is clear that neuronal AChRs can participate in a variety of functions. Presynaptically, the receptors can modulate neurotransmitter release, whereas postsynaptically, they can generate synaptic currents from both synaptic and perisynaptic locations (Role and Berg, 1996; Zhang et al., 1996; Wonnacott, 1997). Some classes of AChRs have a high relative permeability to calcium and can influence calcium-dependent events in neurons, including activation of second messenger cascades.

Neuronal AChRs may play important developmental roles as well. The receptors are expressed early during embryogenesis, as is the enzyme responsible for synthesis of ACh (Zoli et al., 1995; Role and Berg, 1996). AChRs can be found on the tips of growing neurites in cell culture and, when activated, can influence the pattern of neurite growth. Presynaptic AChRs also can enhance neurotransmitter release at newly formed neuromuscular synapses in culture (Fu and Liu, 1996), and they may contribute to the early stages of synaptogenesis.

It is not clear which AChR subtypes are likely to be most important during development, or, in fact, how many AChR subtypes exist. Nine genes encoding neuronal AChR subunits (alpha 2-7; beta 2-4) have been isolated from both chick and rat (Role and Berg, 1996). In addition, alpha 8 has been isolated uniquely from chick, and alpha 9 has been isolated uniquely from rat. Two major AChR subtypes have been identified in brain from both species: one is a receptor with alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits that binds nicotine with high affinity, and the other is a receptor with alpha 7 subunits that binds alpha -Bgt with high affinity (Lindstrom, 1996). Receptor analyses with subunit-specific mAbs also have identified other AChR subunit combinations in brain (Flores et al., 1996; Lindstrom, 1996; Forsayeth and Kobrin, 1997).

Recently, the alkaloid epibatidine emerged as a broad-spectrum cholinergic ligand for neuronal AChRs. [3H]Epibatidine seems to bind with high affinity to all AChR species examined to date, except for some that bind alpha -Bgt (Gerzanich et al., 1995; Houghtling et al., 1995; Wang et al., 1996). As a result, [3H]epibatidine, together with 125I-alpha -Bgt and subunit-specific mAbs, offers a means of identifying and quantifying additional AChR subtypes in brain. In the current report, we used this strategy to address four questions: Do the major AChR species identified in brain contain other gene products as well? Do individual AChR genes often contribute subunits to different AChR subtypes in the central versus peripheral nervous system? Can new AChR subtypes be detected? Do the relative amounts of individual AChR subtypes change substantially during development? Answers to these questions should provide information about the rules governing subunit assembly in neuronal AChRs and may help identify the receptor species most important at early developmental stages.

    Experimental Procedures
Top
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

mAbs. All subunit-specific mAbs used in the current study have been characterized and described previously (see references in Vernallis et al., 1993; Conroy and Berg, 1995). Regarding specificities with chicken neuronal AChR gene products, mAbs 270, 289, 308, 313, and B4-1 both immunoprecipitate and immunoblot selectively the beta 2, alpha 4, alpha 8, alpha 3, and beta 4 gene products, respectively, whereas mAbs 318 and 319 do the same with the alpha 7 gene product. mAb 268 selectively immunoblots (but does not immunoprecipitate) the alpha 5 gene product, whereas mAb 35 immunoprecipitates and immunoblots the alpha 5 gene product (it was raised against electric organ AChRs and recognizes the alpha 1 subunit therein). Experiments with transfected cells indicate that mAb 35 also immunoprecipitates receptors with alpha 3 subunits but does not recognize the alpha 4, alpha 7, alpha 8, beta 2, or beta 4 gene products (Conroy et al., 1992; W. Conroy and D. Berg, unpublished observations). Unless otherwise indicated, the mAbs were diluted from concentrated stocks of hybridoma culture supernatants, or mouse ascites fluid (B4-1 only) for use or were purified using Protein G-Sepharose-4-Fast-Flow (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) or size exclusion chromatography (mAb 289). Purified mAbs 35, 270, 289, 313, and B4-1 and normal IgG were coupled individually to Actigel (Sterogene Bioseparations, Arcadia, CA) at 2-4 mg/ml according to the manufacturer's specifications.

Binding assays. Whole brains were dissected from embryonic day (E) 8-18 chicks and stored frozen at -70° until use. Triton X-100 (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL) extracts of the brains were prepared as described previously (Conroy et al., 1992) using two to four volumes of 2% (w/v) Triton X-100 extraction buffer/g of tissue. For filter binding assays, 2-4 nM [3H]epibatidine or 5-10 nM 125I-alpha -Bgt was incubated with 25 µl of brain extract in a total volume of 0.1 ml for 2 hr at room temperature. After the incubation, 4 ml of wash buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, containing 0.05% Triton X-100) was added, and the solution was filtered immediately through Whatman (Clifton, NJ) GF/B filters presoaked in 0.5% polyethyleneimine. The filters were washed two additional times with 4 ml of wash buffer and counted either by liquid scintillation counting in Ecolite (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) for [3H]epibatidine or by gamma -counting for 125I-alpha -Bgt. Nonspecific binding was determined by incubation in the presence of 200 µM nicotine. Protein in the extracts was quantified by the BCA Protein Assay (Pierce) using bovine serum albumin as standard.

[3H]Epibatidine binding sites associated with specific AChR subunits were quantified using a modification of a solid-phase immunoprecipitation assay (Conroy and Berg, 1995) and the mAbs 35 (alpha 3, alpha 5), 270 (beta 2), 289 (alpha 4), 313 (alpha 3), and B4-1 (beta 4) to tether AChRs. Immulon 2 Removawells (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) were coated with mAb by first incubating the wells overnight at 4° on a shaker with affinity-purified rabbit anti-mouse antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) at a concentration of 20 µg/ml in PBS (1× = 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.01 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) containing 0.02% azide. The wells then were washed three times with PBS-TX and incubated on a shaker overnight at 4° with 50 µl of anti-AChR mAb diluted in buffer. The wells were rinsed three times with PBS-TX and incubated overnight with the detergent extracts. The extracts were removed, and the wells were washed four times with PBS-TX. [3H]Epibatidine (100-200 µl) was added at 2-4 nM in the presence and absence of 200 µM nicotine. The wells were washed four times with PBS-TX and placed in 5 ml of Ecolite (ICN) for liquid scintillation counting.

When competition binding experiments were performed with [3H]epibatidine, the incubations included the indicated compounds with 1 nM [3H]epibatidine and were carried out for 4 hr at room temperature. Plots of competition curves were generated, and IC50 values were determined by a nonlinear least-squares method using Prism (GraphPAD Software, San Diego, CA) assuming a single class of sites in each case. KD values for epibatidine were determined from saturation binding reactions in which the receptor concentration did not exceed 60 pM. Because ligand depletion may nevertheless have had some effect on the KD determinations (Kenakin, 1993), the values are considered approximate (apparent KD values).

Immunodepletions. Extracts were depleted of AChR subtypes by incubation of extracts (0.2 ml) with 40 µl of anti-AChR mAb coupled to Actigel beads. After an overnight incubation, the Actigel beads with bound material were removed by centrifugation. [3H]Epibatidine binding sites then were quantified in the depleted extracts using the filter binding assay.

AChRs also were depleted by incubation of extracts in Immulon 2 Removawells (Dynatech Laboratories) coated with mAbs 270 or 289, as described above for the solid-phase immunoprecipitation assay, to remove AChRs containing beta 2 and alpha 4 subunits, respectively. After recovery of the depleted extracts from the wells, they were used in a solid-phase assay with [3H]epibatidine to quantify the remaining AChRs. Similarly, a combination of mAbs 318 and 319 was used to deplete AChRs with alpha 7 subunits, and mAb 308 was used to deplete AChRs with alpha 8 subunits. 125I-alpha -Bgt binding sites remaining in the depleted extracts then were quantified by the filter binding assay. In sequential depletion experiments, recovered extracts from one round of depletion were subjected to a second round of depletion in a new well containing either the same mAb as in the first round or an mAb to another subunit. In all depletion experiments, normal rat IgG was used in place of the anti-AChR mAbs as a negative control.

Immunoprecipitations and immunoblots. AChRs containing alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 subunits were analyzed by monitoring the coprecipitation of alpha 5 subunits with AChRs containing both alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits. Similar analyses have been used to show the association of alpha 3, alpha 5, and beta 4 subunits in ganglia (Vernallis et al., 1993; Conroy and Berg, 1995). E8 and E18 brain extracts containing equal amounts of protein (0.7 mg) were incubated on Immulon 2 Removawells (Dynatech Laboratories) coated with mAb 289, as described above for the solid-phase assay, to remove AChRs containing alpha 4 subunits. Removawells coated with normal rat IgM served as the negative control. Extracts recovered from these wells then were incubated overnight with 20 µl of mAb 270-Actigel to bind AChRs containing beta 2 subunits. The gel was washed three times with PBS-TX and 2 times with PBS-TX containing 1 M NaCl. Bound material was eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted to nitrocellulose, and probed with mAbs 268 for alpha 5 and 289 for alpha 4 as described previously (Vernallis et al., 1993; Conroy and Berg, 1995). Horseradish peroxidase coupled to goat anti-rat IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch) was used to detect bound mAbs. Signals were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Molecular mass markers for the blots included phosphorylase B (97.4 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66.2 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), and carbonic anhydrase (31 kDa) (low range; BioRad).

Transfections. Chicken AChR gene constructs were used for the transfections. The expression constructs pCDM8-Ch 23.1 and pCDM8-Ch 26.1 containing the beta 2 and alpha 4 cDNAs, respectively, under CMV promoters (Whiting et al., 1991) were kindly provided by Dr. Paul Whiting (Merk, Sharp, & Dohme Laboratories, Essex, England). An alpha 5 cDNA kindly provided by M. Ballivet (University of Geneva, Geneva) was modified to delete untranslated 3' and 5' sequences and to add the alpha 3 leader sequence, which has an efficient Kozak consensus sequence for translation initiation. The modified alpha 5 construct was subcloned into the RSV.An vector (obtained from D. Donahue, University of California, San Diego) under an RSV promoter.

Transfections were performed on HEK 293 cells obtained from J. Wahl (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) and grown in Eagle's minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 units each of penicillin and streptamycin. The cells were plated at 3.4 × 105/35-mm culture dish and maintained at 37° in 95% air/5% CO2. After 24 hr, the cells were transfected using calcium phosphate-DNA precipitation in a BES buffer as described previously (Chen and Okayama, 1987). Transfections usually contained 1 µg of alpha 4, 0.2 µg of beta 2, and/or 0.5 µg of alpha 5 cDNA/dish; pBluescript SK- DNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was added as needed to adjust the total to 2 µg in each case. The ratio of alpha 4 to beta 2 cDNA was chosen to optimize the amount of [3H]epibatidine binding expressed by the cells (see below). The presence of alpha 5 DNA did not significantly alter the amount of [3H]epibatidine binding expressed by cells transfected with alpha 4 and beta 2 cDNA.

After 18-24 hr of transfection, the cells were washed with fresh medium, incubated an additional 24 hr, and then harvested by scraping in 0.5 ml of solubilization buffer containing 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, and the protease inhibitors iodoacetamide (0.4 mM), benzamidine (5 mM), phosphoramidon (5 µg/ml), soybean trypsin inhibitor (10 µg/ml), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), pepstatin A (20 µg/ml), EDTA (5 mM), EGTA (5 mM), aprotinin (2 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM). Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation for 15 min in a microfuge at 4°. [3H]Epibatidine binding sites were quantified using the solid-phase assay. Immunoblot analysis was used to confirm the expression of transfected genes.

Materials. White Leghorn embryonated chick eggs were obtained locally and maintained at 39° in a humidified incubator as described by Conroy et al. (1992). mAb 35 was purified and radioiodinated as described by Smith et al. (1985). alpha -Bgt was purchased from Biotoxins (St. Cloud, FL) and radioiodinated to a specific activity of 0.5-0.7 × 1018 cpm/mol using chloramine T. [3H]Epibatidine (56.5 Ci/mmol) was a generous gift from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Unlabeled epibatidine was purchased from Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA). mAbs 268, 270, 289, 308, 313, 318, and 319 were generously supplied by Dr. Jon Lindstrom (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). All compounds were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise indicated. Dr. Paul Whiting (Merck, Sharp, & Dohme Laboratories) generously provided the chicken AChR alpha 4 and beta 2 gene constructs, and Dr. Marc Ballivet (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland) generously provided the chicken AChR alpha 5 cDNA. Dr. Jeffrey Wahl (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) provided the HEK 293 cells, and Dr. Daniel Donoghue (University of California, San Diego) provided the RSV.An vector.

    Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Epibatidine-binding AChRs in brain. Filter binding assays were used to measure the total number of epibatidine binding sites present in chick brain extracts. A mean value of 109 ± 28 fmol/mg of protein (mean ± standard error; three experiments) was obtained with 2 nM [3H]epibatidine for extracts prepared from E17/18 chick brain. No additional sites were revealed by increasing the concentration of epibatidine (data not shown), which is consistent with previous studies showing that 2 nM epibatidine is sufficient to saturate epibatidine binding sites on neuronal AChRs (Gerzanich et al., 1995; Houghtling et al., 1995; Wang et al., 1996).

Immunodepletion with subunit-specific mAbs before conducting the filter assays provides a means of identifying AChR gene products making up the epibatidine-binding receptors. Anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 immunodepleted approx 75% of the epibatidine binding capacity of E17/18 brain extracts, whereas anti-beta 2 mAb 270 immunodepleted approx 85% (Fig. 1A). No significant depletion was caused by either anti-alpha 3 mAb 313 or anti-beta 4 mAb B4-1. mAb 35, which recognizes the neuronal alpha 3 and alpha 5 gene products, immunodepleted approx 10% of the binding. The results are consistent with the major epibatidine-binding AChR species in E17/18-brain containing the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products. Few AChRs at this stage contain either the alpha 3 or beta 4 gene products, but a portion are likely to contain the alpha 5. This latter conclusion comes from the different amounts of immunodepletion achieved by mAbs 313 and 35. 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Brain AChR species identified by [3H]epibatidine binding and subunit-specific mAbs. A, Receptors containing alpha 4 or beta 2 subunits. Detergent extracts of E17/18 chick brains were incubated with the indicated mAbs (depleting mAb with indicated specificity) to deplete AChRs. The depleted extracts then were assayed for [3H]epibatidine binding in filter binding assays. Normal rat IgG was used as a negative control for the immunodepletions. mAbs to either the alpha 4 or beta 2 gene products depleted most of the [3H]epibatidine binding sites from chick brain extracts. mAb 35 depleted approximately one tenth of the sites, indicating that a small proportion of the AChRs contain at least one other gene product as well (most likely alpha 5). B, Receptors containing alpha 3 or beta 4 subunits. Direct binding of [3H]epibatidine to AChRs immunotethered in solid-phase assays with the indicated mAbs (tethering mAb with indicated specificity) confirms that most contain alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits but also shows that small but significant numbers contain alpha 3 and beta 4 subunits. Values represent the mean ± standard error from three experiments.

A more sensitive method for identifying subpopulations of brain AChRs capable of binding epibatidine is to use a solid-phase immunoprecipitation assay. In this case, a subunit-specific mAb is used to immunotether all receptors containing a given gene product, and then [3H]epibatidine binding is used to quantify the number of receptors retained by the antibody. By this criterion, many epibatidine-binding receptors in E17/18 brain extracts seem to contain only the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products (alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs; Fig. 1B). The anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 immunoprecipitated 86 ± 13% (three experiments), whereas the anti-beta 2 mAb 270 immunoprecipitated 93 ± 12% of the total [3H]epibatidine binding measured with the filter assay. mAb 289 is specific under these conditions; it does not, for example, retain in the two-site assay chick ciliary ganglion AChRs that contain the alpha 3, beta 4, and alpha 5 subunits coassembled (Vernallis et al., 1993) and bind epibatidine in E17/18 extracts (data not shown).

Only small numbers of binding sites were retained by either the anti-alpha 3 mAb 313 or the anti-beta 4 mAb B4-1 in E17/18 brain extracts (Fig. 1B). mAb 35, in contrast, immunotethered approximately one sixth of the total number of sites. Control experiments performed with E17/18 ciliary ganglion extracts demonstrated that mAb 35 is 2.0 ± 0.1-fold (mean ± standard error; three experiments) more efficient than mAb 313 in the two-site assay at capturing AChRs containing the appropriate subunit (summing two sequential immunoprecipitations for each mAb). Identical experiments performed on E17/18 brain extracts indicated that mAb 35 was able to capture 12.1 ± 4.6-fold (three experiments) more receptors than mAb 35 (again summing two sequential passes with each mAb). The results are consistent with those in Fig. 1B and suggest that substantially more brain AChRs contain alpha 5 subunits than alpha 3 subunits. This, together with the other immunoprecipitation data, is consistent with most of the brain receptors recognized by mAb 35 being alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs.

Subunits coassembled with the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products. The ability of the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products to form receptors that bind nicotine with high affinity is well documented (Whiting et al., 1991; Lindstrom, 1996). Less clear is the extent to which the two kinds of gene products are associated with other kinds of subunits in brain AChRs. This was tested by using a combination of immunodepletions and solid-phase assays. One mAb was used to immunodeplete all receptors containing a given gene product, whereas a second mAb was used to immunotether the remaining receptors containing a different gene product. The tethered receptors then were quantified with [3H]epibatidine binding in the solid-phase assay. By comparing the binding values obtained with and without the immunodepletion step, it was possible to assess the proportion of receptors containing both gene products.

When the anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 was used for immunodepletion, approximately three fourths of the epibatidine-binding receptors containing the beta 2 gene product were removed from the extract (Fig. 2A). In addition, more than half of the receptors containing either the alpha 3 or beta 4 gene products were removed. More than half of the receptors recognized by mAb 35 also were removed by the depletion with mAb 289. To test the efficiency of the immunodepletion step, the depleted extracts were tested for residual receptors containing the alpha 4 gene product; approximately one fifth of the control value remained. Taking into account the immunodepletion efficiency determined in this manner, the results indicate that most of the brain AChRs containing the beta 2 gene product and more than half of the receptors containing the alpha 3 or beta 4 gene products also contain the alpha 4 gene product. The same is likely to be true of receptors containing the alpha 5 gene product and recognized by mAb 35, namely, that they also contain the alpha 4 gene product.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequential immunodepletions to identify the proportion of receptors containing two given gene products coassembled. A, Receptors containing alpha 4 coassembled with other subunits. After immunodepletion with the anti-alpha 4 mAb 289, extracts were analyzed for [3H]epibatidine binding using solid-phase immunoprecipitation assays in which the indicated mAbs (tethering mAb with indicated specificity) were used to immunotether receptors containing the corresponding gene product. The results are expressed as a percentage of the binding obtained in the absence of immunodepletion [i.e., when normal rat IgM was substituted for the IgM mAb 289 (defined as 100%)]. With mAb 289 used for both the depletion and tethering of receptor in the solid-phase assay, the efficiency of depletion was shown to be >= 75%. B, Receptors containing beta 2 coassembled with other subunits. Experiments were performed as in A except that anti-beta 2 mAb 270 replaced mAb 289 in the immunodepletion step; efficiency of depletion was approx 85%. Values represent the mean ± standard error from three separate experiments.

Immunodepletion with the anti-beta 2 mAb 270 removed >80% of the alpha 4- and beta 2-containing receptors, corroborating the results obtained with mAb 289 (Fig. 2B). Between one half and three fourths of the alpha 3 and beta 4-containing receptors were removed, as was more than three fourths of the receptors recognized by mAb 35. More than three fourths of the beta 2-containing receptors also were removed by the immunodepletion, demonstrating the efficiency of the antibody. The results support previous findings indicating that a substantial portion of the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products are assembled into alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs with no other apparent subunits. The results also show, however, that some alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits combine with additional kinds of subunits to make up a heterogeneous population of epibatidine-binding AChRs in the CNS.

Coassembly of alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 subunits in transfected cells. The fact that mAb 35 immunoprecipitates many more epibatidine-binding sites from brain extracts than does the alpha 3-specific mAb 313 suggests that the receptors contain alpha 5 subunits instead of alpha 3 subunits. These could represent alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs and constitute a significant fraction of all brain receptors containing the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products at the end of embryogenesis. Recently, the alpha 5 gene product has been shown capable of assembling with alpha 4 and beta 2 when coexpressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996). We examined this issue in cells that were not oocytes.

HEK 293 cells were transiently transfected with various combinations of the alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 cDNAs. Two days later, cell extracts were prepared and examined in solid-phase assays for receptors that could bind [3H]epibatidine and be immunotethered by anti-AChR mAbs. The alpha 4 and beta 2 gene combination produced a large number of receptors tethered either by anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 or by anti-beta 2 mAb 270, but none were recognized by mAb 35 (Fig. 3). Inclusion of alpha 5 cDNA in the transfection with alpha 4 and beta 2 had little effect on the total number of epibatidine-binding receptors tethered by mAbs 289 or 270 but generated a significant number of receptors recognized by mAb 35. Transfection with alpha 5 alone, alpha 5 plus alpha 4, or alpha 5 plus beta 2 yielded no significant epibatidine binding retained by any of the mAbs. The results clearly indicate that the alpha 5 gene product can combine with the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products to produce epibatidine-binding alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Coassembly of the alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 gene products in transfected cells to produce epibatidine-binding AChRs. HEK 293 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated combinations of AChR gene cDNAs and subsequently solubilized and assayed for [3H]epibatidine binding in solid-phase assays using the indicated mAbs to tether receptors. The total amount of epibatidine binding was not influenced by expression of the alpha 5 gene, but only expression of the alpha 5 gene in concert with alpha 4 and beta 2 produced epibatidine-binding receptors that could be immunoprecipitated by mAb 35. Because mAb 35 recognizes alpha 5 protein but not alpha 4 or beta 2 protein, the data indicate that the three gene products coassembled.

Ligand binding properties of AChR subtypes. In X. laevis oocytes, heterologous expression of the chick AChR alpha 4 and beta 2 genes with and without the alpha 5 gene shows that alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs have a 100-fold higher EC50 value for activation by ACh than that of alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs (20). In contrast, expression of the human alpha 5 gene in oocytes with the alpha 3 and beta 4 genes has no effect on the ACh dose-response curve, whereas expression of alpha 5 with the alpha 3 and beta 2 genes shifts the EC50 value to smaller values (Wang et al., 1996).

To examine the possible contribution of alpha 5 subunits to the pharmacology of native AChRs containing the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene product, we first used mAb 35 to isolate a population of receptors from brain extract that included those with alpha 5 subunits. mAb 289 then was used on the same mAb 35-depleted extracts to isolate a receptor population containing alpha 4 (and presumably beta 2) but not alpha 5 subunits. Binding assays revealed no significant difference in the affinity of the two receptor populations for [3H]epibatidine. The presumed alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs had an apparent KD value of 2.8 ± 0.7 pM (five experiments), whereas alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs had an apparent KD value of 5.4 ± 2.6 pM (three experiments). Similar binding assays with alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs isolated by mAb 35 from HEK 293 cells transfected with alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 cDNA or with alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs isolated by mAb 289 from cells transfected with alpha 4 and beta 2 cDNA yielded apparent KD values of 2.3 ± 0.5 pM (seven experiments) and 2.6 ± 0.9 pM (four experiments), respectively. Thus, receptors of known subunit composition from transfected cells corroborated the results with native AChRs in showing no difference in epibatidine affinity that could be ascribed to the presence of alpha 5 subunits.

Competition binding studies with [3H]epibatidine were used to compare the binding affinities of receptor subtypes for other nicotinic ligands (Fig. 4). A comparison of IC50 values indicated at most a nominal 5-fold difference in affinity between putative alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5- and alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs isolated from brain extract as described above (Table 1). The IC50 values for alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5- and alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs from transfected cells were essentially indistinguishable from their brain counterparts. The results are consistent with the inferred subunit composition of the brain AChR subtypes and indicate little effect of alpha 5 subunits on ligand affinity in binding assays.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding isotherms showing little difference between receptors containing the alpha 5 subunit and those lacking it. AChRs were solubilized from E17 chick brain and immunotethered either (A) with mAb 35 or (B) with mAb 289 after having first depleted the extract with mAb 35. Competition binding studies were carried out with [3H]epibatidine and the indicated ligands in solid-phase assays. Values represent the mean ± standard error of three determinations for each point from a single experiment. Similar results were obtained in at least two additional experiments. DHBE, dihydro-beta -erythroidine.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Ligand binding properties of AChRs immunoisolated from brain and transfected HEK 293 cells

AChRs from brain and HEK 293 cell extracts were immunotethered with subunit-specific mAbs in solid-phase immunoprecipitation assays and subjected to competition binding with [3H]epibatidine and the indicated ligands as described in Fig. 4. Brain mAb 35 AChRs were isolated from brain extracts with mAb 35; brain mAb 289 AChRS were isolated from brain extracts with mAb 289 after depletion with mAb 35; HEK 293 alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5 AChRs were isolated from HEK 293 cells transfected with the alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 genes and using mAb 35; and HEK 293 alpha 4/beta 2 AChRs were isolated from HEK 293 cells transfected with the alpha 4 and beta 2 genes and using mAb 270. Values are mean ± standard error of three or four separate determinations. Few differences exist among them; HEK 293 alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5 AChRs seem to be indistinguishable from brain mAb 35 AChRs, whereas HEK 293 alpha 4/beta 2 AChRs are very similar to brain mAb 289 AChRs.

Changing populations of epibatidine-binding AChRs during development. The relative contributions of individual AChR gene products to epibatidine-binding AChR subtypes in brain were measured during development. The goal was to determine whether different species predominated at early versus late times. Solid-phase assays revealed three patterns. Of the epibatidine-binding AChRs, receptors containing either the alpha 4 or the beta 2 gene product were the most abundant at all times examined and increased developmentally approx 3-fold between E8 and E17/18 (Fig. 5A). This was over and above increases due to cell growth as reflected in the amount of total protein. Receptors containing either the alpha 3 or beta 4 gene products were the least abundant at all times examined and showed no developmental increase between E8 and E17/18; the small increase in binding sites represented net growth because no change was apparent when the values were normalized for protein. Most striking was the change in the number of epibatidine-binding receptors recognized by mAb 35. These increased 7-fold between E8 and E17/18 when normalized for protein (Fig. 5B). Because no developmental increase was observed in the number of receptors containing the alpha 3 gene product over the same time period, much of the increase is likely to involve receptors with alpha 5 subunits.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Developmental changes in the epibatidine-binding AChRs expressed in vivo. Whole brains dissected from chick embryos at the indicated times were solubilized and assayed for [3H]epibatidine binding using the solid-phase assay and subunit-specific mAbs to immunotether selected AChR subtypes. Receptors containing alpha 4 protein were tethered with mAb 289 (square ), beta 2 with mAb 270 (black-diamond ), alpha 3 with mAb 313 (black-triangle), beta 4 with mAb B4-1 (×), and the combination of alpha 3 and alpha 5 (and possibly unknown AChR gene products) with mAb 35 (open circle ). A, Absolute amounts; binding is expressed per mg of protein. B, Relative increases; binding is normalized to that present at E8. Values represent the mean ± standard error from three or four experiments conducted on two or more preparations of extract.

Immunoblot analysis provides a method for using the available mAbs to confirm the presence of individual gene products in AChRs and determine whether developmental increases in receptors recognized by mAb 35 correlates with increases in receptors containing alpha 5 subunits. Brain AChRs were concentrated by immunoprecipitation, eluted, gel electrophoresed, and analyzed on blots probed with subunit-specific mAbs. All five AChR gene products inferred above to be present in brain AChRs were detected on the blots (Fig. 6A). The relative amounts of alpha 5 protein assembled with alpha 4 and beta 2 protein at early and late developmental stages then was assessed by using the anti-beta 2 mAb 270 to immunoprecipitate the receptors. The material was eluted, electrophoresed, and analyzed on blots probed with mAb 289 to detect alpha 4 protein and mAb 268 to detect alpha 5 protein. Both alpha 4 and alpha 5 protein could be detected, and both increased substantially between E8 and E17/18 (Fig. 6B). Immunodepletion with the anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 before immunoprecipitation with mAb 270 removed large amounts of the alpha 4 and alpha 5 proteins subsequently detected on the blots. The results confirm the conclusions that a portion of the native AChRs containing alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits also contain alpha 5 subunits and that the amount of this species increases developmentally. Interestingly, a portion of the alpha 5 protein also seems to be associated with a different receptor species late in development because some of the alpha 5 gene product associated with beta 2 (and immunoprecipitated by the anti-beta 2 mAb 270) cannot be immunodepleted by the anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Immunoblot analysis of brain AChR subtypes probed with subunit-specific mAbs. A, AChR gene products in E18 brain extracts. Receptors were immunopurified with the indicated mAb (IP mAb), subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted, and probed with the indicated mAb (probe mAb with indicated specificity). Lane 1, alpha 4. Lane 2, beta 2. Lane 3, alpha 3. Lane 4, beta 4. Lane 5, alpha 5 gene product. B, Developmental increase in brain AChRs containing alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 subunits coassembled. Receptors were immunopurified from E8 (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) and E17/18 (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8) brain extracts with the anti-beta 2 mAb 270 (IP mAb) before (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) and after (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) immunodepletion with the anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 (depleting mAb) and then subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted, and probed (probe mAb) with either the anti-alpha 4 mAb 289 (lanes 1-4) or the anti-alpha 5 mAb 268 (lanes 5-8). Almost all of the alpha 5 protein at E8 is coassembled with both alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits, and the amount increases substantially by E17/18. Some of the alpha 5 protein at the later developmental stage also is found in a species lacking alpha 4 subunits. The large molecular weight material detected with mAb 289 as probe (A, lane 1; B, lanes 1-4) is aggregated alpha 4 protein. Similar results were obtained in three experiments.

Developmental changes in the population of brain AChRs that bind alpha -Bgt. The total number of alpha -Bgt-binding AChRs detected in brain extracts using 125I-alpha -Bgt in the filter assay was substantially higher at all stages examined than was the total number of epibatidine-binding AChRs (Fig. 7A). A developmental increase of approx 3-fold occurred in the number of alpha -Bgt-binding receptors between E8 and E17/18. Immunodepletion with the anti-alpha 7 mAbs 318/319 indicated that most of the alpha -Bgt-binding receptors at both early and late times in embryonic brain contain the alpha 7 gene product, whereas approximately half also contain the alpha 8 gene product (Fig. 7B). Sequential immunoprecipitations were required to collect all of the receptors containing the alpha 8 gene product, presumably because of the inefficiency of the antibody. A small fraction of the total alpha -Bgt-binding AChRs at both early and late times may contain gene products other than alpha 7 and alpha 8 gene because some alpha -Bgt-binding species remained in solution even after repeated immunoprecipitations. A similar fraction of alpha -Bgt-binding species remained in E17/18 ciliary ganglion extracts after sequential immunoprecipitations in the two-site assay with mAbs 318/319 (data not shown), and a portion of this has been attributed previously to an AChR species lacking the alpha 7 gene product (Pugh et al., 1995). Much of the remainder, however, could represent receptor in which the relevant epitopes are blocked or degraded. No significant change was observed between E8 and E17/18 in the ratios of the alpha -Bgt-binding species in brain.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Developmental changes in the amount of alpha -Bgt-binding AChRs. A, Total alpha -Bgt binding sites/mg of protein in brain as a function of embryonic age. Whole-brain extracts were prepared at the indicated times and assayed for 125I-alpha -Bgt binding sites (black-square) or, for comparison, [3H]epibatidine binding sites (open circle ) using the filter binding assay. Values were normalized for protein and represent the mean ± standard error from three to seven experiments. B, Proportion of alpha -Bgt-binding AChRs in brain containing alpha 7 and/or alpha 8 subunits. Brain extracts were prepared from E8 and E17/18 chicks, depleted with either the anti-alpha 7 mAbs 318 and 319 or with the anti-alpha 8 mAb 308, and then assayed for residual 125I-alpha -Bgt binding sites using the filter binding assay. Sequential immunodepletions either with the same mAbs (x2) or with mAbs to alpha 7 and then alpha 8 (alpha 7 + alpha 8) were performed to evaluate the efficiency of the immunodepletions. Values represent the mean ± standard error from three or four experiments.

    Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Epibatidine and alpha -Bgt together as probes distinguish several major classes of AChRs in brain. Most abundant are receptors binding alpha -Bgt and containing either alpha 7 or alpha 7 plus alpha 8 subunits. Together they make up at least three fourths of the total alpha -Bgt-binding species at all developmental stages examined and represent nearly two thirds of the total AChRs distinguished in the combined filter assays. The findings are consistent with earlier reports of abundant alpha -Bgt-binding AChRs containing alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunits in chick brain (Gotti et al., 1994a; Lindstrom, 1996). The current study shows that only a small fraction of the total alpha -Bgt binding in brain at either early or late developmental times is a candidate for receptor species lacking both the alpha 7 and alpha 8 gene products. Gotti et al. (1994b) reported that approximately half of the alpha -Bgt-binding receptors in chick brain between E7 and E13 could not be immunoprecipitated by antisera against either alpha 7 or alpha 8 peptides. The reason for the discrepancy between the earlier results and those reported here is not clear but may be due to differences in the efficiency of receptor immunoprecipitation in the two studies.

The next most abundant species of brain AChRs is one that binds epibatidine and contains the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products. These constitute >80% of the total epibatidine-binding receptors at all developmental stages examined and represent approx 15% of the total brain AChRs detected in filter assays with epibatidine and alpha -Bgt. The same AChR subtype was identified previously as a major species capable of binding nicotine with high affinity in rat and chick brain (Lindstrom, 1996).

Another AChR species distinguished here in brain is one that binds epibatidine and contains not only the alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products but also gene products recognized by mAb 35. Previous studies in chick have shown that mAb 35 recognizes the alpha 3 and alpha 5 neuronal AChR gene products but not the alpha 4, alpha 7, alpha 8, beta 2, or beta 4 gene products (Conroy et al., 1992; Vernallis et al., 1993; Lindstrom, 1996). Because the anti-alpha 3 mAb 313 is unable to immunoprecipitate the vast majority of such receptors, they are unlikely to contain alpha 3 subunits. Instead, sequential immunoprecipitations with other mAbs followed by immunoblot analysis with the anti-alpha 5 mAb 268 confirm that a portion of the AChRs in brain containing alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits also contain alpha 5 subunits and seem to be alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs.

Heterologous coexpression of alpha 4, beta 2, and alpha 5 constructs in both X. laevis oocytes (Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996) and HEK 293 cells produces alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs. An electrophysiological comparison of alpha 4/beta 2- and alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChR in oocytes shows that the alpha 5 subunit reduces receptor affinity for ACh as judged by dose-response curves (Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996). Binding studies on receptors from HEK 293 cells, however, reveal no difference between alpha 4/beta 2- and alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs in affinity for several nicotinic ligands. A likely reason for the different results is that the electrophysiological analysis measured ligand affinity of nondesensitized receptors, whereas the equilibrium binding studies used for the current report almost certainly measured ligand affinity of desensitized receptors. An alternative possibility is that oocytes and HEK 293 cells influence receptor pharmacology differently through the kinds of post-translational modifications they provide. A similar argument has been advanced to account for differences in the single-channel events seen for AChRs produced by oocytes versus neurons (Sivilotti et al., 1997). Consistent with current results, previous researchers (Lindstrom, 1996) have found no difference in the binding affinities of nicotine, cytisine, or epibatidine for chick brain AChRs immunoprecipitated by either mAb 35 or anti-alpha 4 mAbs. The results underscore the need for caution in using pharmacology alone to draw conclusions about subunit composition, but they do not conflict with the conclusion based on immunoprecipitations and immunoblot analysis showing that the alpha 5 gene product coassembles with alpha 4 and beta 2 in brain.

In situ hybridization analyses demonstrate that alpha 4 and beta 2 transcripts are widely expressed in both rat and chick brain (Wada et al., 1989; Morris et al., 1990). Although the distribution of alpha 5 mRNA has not been examined in chick, in situ hybridization studies in rat brain show extensive overlap between regions expressing alpha 5 transcripts and those expressing alpha 4 and beta 2 (Wada et al., 1990). Overlap also is found in both rat and chick between brain regions expressing alpha 3 and those expressing alpha 4 and beta 2 (Wada et al., 1989; Morris et al., 1990; Lobron et al., 1995). The same is true for beta 4 expression in rat brain (Dineley-Miller et al., 1992).

Three remaining neuronal AChR genes in chick, alpha 2, alpha 6, and beta 3, were not included in the current study because subunit-specific antibodies were not available. Least relevant is beta 3 because in situ hybridization analysis indicates that expression of the gene is largely confined to the retina and trigeminal ganglion in chick (Hernandez et al., 1995). Both the alpha 2 and alpha 6 genes are expressed in chick brain (Wada et al., 1989; Daubas et al., 1990; Gerzanich et al., 1997) and may contribute subunits to receptors currently thought to be either alpha 4/beta 2-AChRs or alpha 4/beta 2/alpha 5-AChRs. Neither alpha 2 nor alpha 6 is likely to define a large class of entirely separate brain AChRs, however, because most epibatidine-binding receptors can be immunoprecipitated by both anti-alpha 4 and anti-beta 2 mAbs. The alpha 2 and alpha 6 gene products could, in principle, account for some of the mAb 35 binding to brain AChRs. Preliminary results opposing this for the alpha 2 gene product come from immunoprecipitations with mAb 321, which was raised against an alpha 2-specific peptide sequence (R. Schoepfer, W. Conroy, and J. Lindstrom, unpublished observations); mAb 321 immunoprecipitates only 1-2% of the total epibatidine-binding receptors from E17/18 chick brain extracts (W. Conroy and D. Berg, unpublished observations). The alpha 6 gene product has yet to be tested for mAb 35 binding but is not a likely candidate because it lacks a critical moiety in the domain recognized by the antibody (Saedi et al., 1990; Gerzanich et al., 1997). Nevertheless, the subunit heterogeneity of AChRs that bind mAb 35 and contain alpha 4 and beta 2 gene products could be even greater than shown here.

Previous studies indicated that neuronal AChRs can contain more than one kind of alpha -type subunit, as well as more than one kind of beta -type subunit (Conroy et al., 1992; Vernallis et al., 1993; Conroy and Berg, 1995; Lindstrom, 1996; Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1996; Forsayeth and Kobrin, 1997). An individual AChR gene product also can enter into different subunit associations depending on the partners available. The current findings extend this pattern, showing that AChR gene products common in the peripheral nervous system also are expressed in the central nervous system but largely assemble with different partners in the two cases. Thus, the alpha 5 gene product is assembled with alpha 3, beta 2, and beta 4 in autonomic neurons but usually not with alpha 4 (Listerud et al., 1991; Vernallis et al., 1993; Mandelzys et al., 1994; Conroy and Berg, 1995; Flores et al., 1996), whereas in brain, alpha 5 subunits are assembled in considerable measure with alpha 4 and beta 2. Similarly, the alpha 3 and beta 4 gene products are assembled with alpha 5 and to some extent beta 2 in autonomic neurons but usually not with alpha 4 (Listerud et al., 1991; Vernallis et al., 1993; Mandelzys et al., 1994; Conroy and Berg, 1995; Flores et al., 1996), whereas in brain alpha 3 and beta 4 are assembled mostly with alpha 4 and beta 2.

Changing AChR patterns during brain development suggest that receptors containing the alpha 3 and beta 4 gene products are likely to be most important at early times and less so at later stages because their levels undergo no developmental increase beyond that present at E8. This view is consistent with in situ hybridization studies in rat showing that alpha 3 and beta 4 mRNA appear early in development and then virtually disappear from the brain and spinal cord at later times (Zoli et al., 1995). Transcripts for alpha 7 and for alpha 4 and beta 2 in rat brain undergo more sustained increases throughout development (Broide et al., 1995; Ostermann et al., 1995; Zoli et al., 1995; del Toro et al., 1997), which is consistent with the sustained developmental increases in AChRs containing the gene products reported here. An interesting exception is the case of beta 2 gene expression in chick optic tectum, which is transient and dependent on innervation from the eye (Matter et al., 1990).

The largest developmental increase observed in the current study was that of AChRs recognized by mAb 35. They undergo a 7-fold increase between E8 and E17/18 over and above that expected from net growth and represent approximately one sixth of all epibatidine-binding receptors at the end of embryogenesis. Immunoblot analysis confirmed a developmental increase in alpha 5 protein associated with alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits in such receptors. Some of the increase in epibatidine-binding AChRs recognized by mAb 35 also may represent the appearance of receptors containing alpha 5 subunits coassembled with different AChR gene products, however, because not all of the receptors could be immunoprecipitated by anti-alpha 4 mAbs. In fact, AChRs that bind mAb 35 constitute approximately one half of the receptors capable of high affinity nicotine binding in adult chicken brain and can be immunoprecipitated by the anti-beta 2 mAb 270 but not by the anti-alpha 4 mAb 285 (Lindstrom, 1996). The subunit composition of this species includes components of 49 and 58 kDa (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1986), with the former being in the size range expected for both the alpha 5 and beta 2 proteins (Conroy et al., 1992).

Differences in subunit composition are likely to influence many aspects of receptor function. Among these are the rates of receptor activation and desensitization, agonist sensitivity, calcium permeability, second messenger regulation, and possibly location on the cell surface. Considered broadly, the fact that a given AChR gene product is assembled with different subunit partners suggests the receptors perform different physiological functions but share a need for the specific features conferred by individual subunits. Identification of unique features contributed by individual subunits is a challenge for subsequent studies.

    Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jon Lindstrom (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) for generously providing the indicated mAbs and Dr. Paul Whiting (Merk, Sharp, & Dohme Laboratories, Essex, England) and Dr. Marc Ballivet (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland) for generously providing cDNA constructs. Lynn Ogden provided expert technical assistance.

    Footnotes

Received August 5, 1997; Accepted November 23, 1997

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NS12601 and NS35469), Muscular Dystrophy Association, Council for Tobacco Research (4191), and Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program.

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Darwin K. Berg, Department of Biology, 0357, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0357. E-mail: dberg{at}ucsd.edu.

    Abbreviations

ACh, acetylcholine; AChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; alpha -Bgt, alpha -bungarotoxin; DHBE, dihydro-beta -erythroidine; HEK, human embryonic kidney; mAb, monoclonal antibody; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PBS-TX, phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% (w/v) Triton X-100; EGTA, ethylene glycol bis(beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid.

    References
Top
Summary
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References


0026-895X/98/030392-10$3.00/0
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 53:392-401 (1998).
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Cerpa, J. A. Godoy, I. Alfaro, G. G. Farias, M. J. Metcalfe, R. Fuentealba, C. Bonansco, and N. C. Inestrosa
Wnt-7a Modulates the Synaptic Vesicle Cycle and Synaptic Transmission in Hippocampal Neurons
J. Biol. Chem., February 29, 2008; 283(9): 5918 - 5927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. G. Farias, A. S. Valles, M. Colombres, J. A. Godoy, E. M. Toledo, R. J. Lukas, F. J. Barrantes, and N. C. Inestrosa
Wnt-7a Induces Presynaptic Colocalization of {alpha}7-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Adenomatous Polyposis Coli in Hippocampal Neurons
J. Neurosci., May 16, 2007; 27(20): 5313 - 5325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. M. Marritt, B. C. Cox, R. P. Yasuda, J. M. McIntosh, Y. Xiao, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar
Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Rat Retina: Simple and Mixed Heteromeric Subtypes
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1656 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. V. Plazas, E. Katz, M. E. Gomez-Casati, C. Bouzat, and A. B. Elgoyhen
Stoichiometry of the {alpha}9{alpha}10 Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor
J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10905 - 10912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. J. Zhu, R. R. Stewart, J. M. McIntosh, and F. F. Weight
Activation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Increases the Frequency of Spontaneous GABAergic IPSCs in Rat Basolateral Amygdala Neurons
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3081 - 3091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. R. Turner and K. J. Kellar
Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Rat Cerebellum: Multiple Heteromeric Subtypes
J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9258 - 9265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. McIntosh, P. V. Plazas, M. Watkins, M. E. Gomez-Casati, B. M. Olivera, and A. B. Elgoyhen
A Novel {alpha}-Conotoxin, PeIA, Cloned from Conus pergrandis, Discriminates between Rat {alpha}9{alpha}10 and {alpha}7 Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., August 26, 2005; 280(34): 30107 - 30112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. F. Vallejo, B. Buisson, D. Bertrand, and W. N. Green
Chronic Nicotine Exposure Upregulates Nicotinic Receptors by a Novel Mechanism
J. Neurosci., June 8, 2005; 25(23): 5563 - 5572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. L. Hanganu and H. J. Luhmann
Functional Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Subplate Neurons in Neonatal Rat Somatosensory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 189 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Vailati, M. Moretti, R. Longhi, G. E. Rovati, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Developmental Expression of Heteromeric Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes in Chick Retina
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2003; 63(6): 1329 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Q. Nai, J. M. McIntosh, and J. F. Margiotta
Relating Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes Defined by Subunit Composition and Channel Function
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 311 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. L. Papke, P. R. Sanberg, and R. D. Shytle
Analysis of Mecamylamine Stereoisomers on Human Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 12, 2001; 297(2): 646 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Buisson and D. Bertrand
Chronic Exposure to Nicotine Upregulates the Human {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Function
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2001; 21(6): 1819 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Z. Shao and J. L Yakel
Single channel properties of neuronal nicotinic ACh receptors in stratum radiatum interneurons of rat hippocampal slices
J. Physiol., September 15, 2000; 527(3): 507 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. N Sudweeks and J. L Yakel
Functional and molecular characterization of neuronal nicotinic ACh receptors in rat CA1 hippocampal neurons
J. Physiol., September 15, 2000; 527(3): 515 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. W. Oppenheim, D. Prevette, A. D'Costa, S. Wang, L. J. Houenou, and J. M. McIntosh
Reduction of Neuromuscular Activity Is Required for the Rescue of Motoneurons from Naturally Occurring Cell Death by Nicotinic-Blocking Agents
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2000; 20(16): 6117 - 6124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Balestra, S. Vailati, M. Moretti, W. Hanke, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Chick Optic Lobe Contains a Developmentally Regulated alpha 2alpha 5beta 2 Nicotinic Receptor Subtype
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2000; 58(2): 300 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Cuevas, A. L Roth, and D. K Berg
Two distinct classes of functional {alpha}7-containing nicotinic receptor on rat superior cervical ganglion neurons
J. Physiol., June 15, 2000; 525(3): 735 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. D. Shoop, N. Yamada, and D. K. Berg
Cytoskeletal Links of Neuronal Acetylcholine Receptors Containing alpha 7 Subunits
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2000; 20(11): 4021 - 4029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Q.-s. Liu and D. K. Berg
Actin Filaments and the Opposing Actions of CaM Kinase II and Calcineurin in Regulating alpha 7-Containing Nicotinic Receptors on Chick Ciliary Ganglion Neurons
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1999; 19(23): 10280 - 10288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Q.-S. Liu and D. K. Berg
Extracellular Calcium Regulates Responses of Both alpha 3- and alpha 7-Containing Nicotinic Receptors on Chick Ciliary Ganglion Neurons
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1124 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Vailati, W. Hanke, A. Bejan, B. Barabino, R. Longhi, B. Balestra, M. Moretti, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Functional alpha 6-Containing Nicotinic Receptors Are Present in Chick Retina
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1999; 56(1): 11 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. T. Chang and D. K. Berg
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Containing alpha 7 Subunits Are Required for Reliable Synaptic Transmission In Situ
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1999; 19(10): 3701 - 3710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. J. Marks, P. Whiteaker, J. Calcaterra, J. A. Stitzel, A. E. Bullock, S. R. Grady, M. R. Picciotto, J.-P. Changeux, and A. C. Collins
Two Pharmacologically Distinct Components of Nicotinic Receptor-Mediated Rubidium Efflux in Mouse Brain Require the beta 2 Subunit
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1999; 289(2): 1090 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. D. Shoop, M. E. Martone, N. Yamada, M. H. Ellisman, and D. K. Berg
Neuronal Acetylcholine Receptors with alpha 7 Subunits Are Concentrated on Somatic Spines for Synaptic Signaling in Embryonic Chick Ciliary Ganglia
J. Neurosci., January 15, 1999; 19(2): 692 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. M. Blumenthal, R. D. Shoop, and D. K. Berg
Developmental Changes in the Nicotinic Responses of Ciliary Ganglion Neurons
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Cuevas and D. K. Berg
Mammalian Nicotinic Receptors with alpha 7 Subunits That Slowly Desensitize and Rapidly Recover from alpha -Bungarotoxin Blockade
J. Neurosci., December 15, 1998; 18(24): 10335 - 10344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conroy, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conroy, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics