|
|
|
|
Vol. 53, Issue 4, 691-700, April 1998
Graduate Program in Biochemistry Cell and Molecular Biology (W.P.L.) and Center for Molecular Toxicology (M.P.-G., J.C.T., G.H.P.), Department of Veterinary Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of protein kinase C (PKC) in the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor (hAhR) signal transduction pathway was examined in cell lines stably transfected with pGUDLUC6.1, in which luc+ is solely controlled by four dioxin-responsive elements (DREs). These cell lines, P5A11 and HG40/6, were derived from HeLa and HepG2 cells respectively. Simultaneous treatment of these cells with 2,3,7,8,-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) enhanced trans-activation of the reporter construct several-fold relative to cells treated with TCDD alone. PKC inhibitors block the PMA effect and hAhR-mediated signal transduction, demonstrating these processes require PKC activity. Examination of other independently generated, HeLa-derived cell lines stably transfected with pGUDLUC6.1 demonstrates the PMA effect in P5A11 cells is not a clonal artifact. Transient transfections indicate the PMA effect is not due to a luciferase message/gene product stabilization mechanism or stimulation of the basal transcription machinery. Examination of cytosolic preparations demonstrates PKC stimulation or inhibition does not alter hAhR and hAhR nuclear translocator protein levels or TCDD-induced down-regulation of hAhR levels. Similarly, examination of nuclear extracts indicated PKC stimulation or inhibition does not alter nuclear AhR levels or hAhR/hAhR nuclear translocator protein heterodimer DRE-binding activity as assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. These results demonstrate a PKC-mediated event is required for the hAhR to form a functional transcriptional complex that leads to trans-activation and that the DRE is the minimal DNA element required for PMA to enhance AhR-mediated trans-activation.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Halogenated
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are environmental contaminants of
concern from a human health perspective due to their widespread
distribution (Fernandez-Salguero et al., 1996
). The
prototypic compound used to study the toxic response to halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is TCDD. TCDD binds with high affinity
to the AhR to generate the activated receptor; which is responsible for
nearly all of the biological effects of dioxin (Fernandez-Salguero
et al., 1996
). The biological/toxic effects of TCDD on
mammals include thymic atrophy, teratogenesis, a slow wasting syndrome,
tumor promotion, and chloracne (Poland and Knutson, 1992
). Null
ARNT allele mice were not viable past embryonic day 10.5, were defective in angiogenesis, and had impaired development (Maltepe
et al., 1997
), whereas null Ahr allele mice were
viable and fertile but had slowed early growth and hepatic defects
(Fernandez-Salguero et al., 1995
; (Schmidt et
al., 1996
). The phenotypes of these null allele mice demonstrate
both the AhR and its heterodimerization partner, the ARNT, play
essential roles in development and normal cellular metabolism.
Before TCDD exposure, the AhR is found predominantly in a
cytoplasmically localized 9S complex containing the AhR, two HSP90 molecules, and a protein of currently unknown function, hepatitis B
virus X-associated protein 2 (Chen and Perdew, 1996
; Meyer et al., 1998
). This 9S, ligand-activated, AhR complex then traverses the nuclear membrane, HSP90 dissociates, and the AhR forms a 6S heterodimer with the ARNT. The AhR/ARNT heterodimer is capable of
binding to DREs and altering transcription of dioxin-responsive genes
(Swanson et al., 1993
). Genes that are regulated by the AhR
include CYP4501A1, the glutathione-S-transferase Ya subunit, NAD(P)H:quinone reductase, plasminogen activator inhibitor 2, and
interleukin 1 (Poland and Knutson, 1992
).
The AhR and ARNT are members of the PAS family of transcription
factors. DNA binding and heterodimerization of the AhR and ARNT involve
the amino-terminal portions of these proteins, which contain basic and
helix-loop-helix motifs and a PAS domain (Reisz-Porszasz et
al., 1994
; Ma et al., 1995
). In addition, the AhR
contains a HSP90 and ligand-binding domain within the PAS domain
(Perdew and Bradfield, 1996
). The carboxyl-terminal regions of the AhR and ARNT act as transcription activation domains; however, in the
AhR/ARNT heterodimer, the AhR transcription activation domain is
dominant (Ko et al., 1996
). The AhR and ARNT are both
phosphoproteins with phosphorylation of the AhR seeming to occur
predominately on its carboxyl-terminal half (Perdew GH, unpublished
observations; Mahon and Gasiewicz, 1995
). Furthermore, the AhR and ARNT
proteins are both phosphorylated on threonine residues, suggesting a
serine/threonine kinase may be involved directly or indirectly in the
regulation of the functions of these proteins (Perdew GH, unpublished
observations).
A variety of data obtained from in vitro experiments,
whole-animal studies, and eukaryotic cell culture experiments suggest the serine/threonine kinase PKC, which is activated by the DAG analog
PMA, plays an important role in the regulation of the AhR signal
transduction pathway (Nishizuka, 1995
). Treatment of mice topically
with PMA or AhR ligands revealed CYP1A1 induction was down-regulated in
PMA-treated mice (Reiners et al., 1992
). Similarly, treatment of mice subcutaneously with PMA or AhR ligands revealed CYP1A1 induction was down-regulated in PMA-treated mice (Okino et
al., 1992
). Pretreatment of human keratinocytes and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells with PMA before TCDD exposure resulted in decreased
P4501A1 expression relative to cells treated with TCDD alone (Moore
et al., 1993
; Berghard et al., 1993
);
interestingly, longer pretreatments of MCF-7 cells with PMA resulted in
superinducibility of CYP1A1 by TCDD. Chen and Tukey (1996)
examined the
effects of PMA on the ligand-induced transcriptional activation of the AhR in human HepG2 101L cells, which are stably transfected with 1904 bases of 5'-flanking DNA from the promoter of the human CYP1A1 gene
fused to the firefly luciferase structural gene. Pretreatment of 101L
cells with PMA resulted in a 2-3-fold enhancement in the induction of
the stably transfected reporter construct relative to cells treated
with TCDD alone; in addition, PKC inhibitors blocked this PMA-induced
enhancement of luciferase expression and the ability of TCDD to induce
the luciferase reporter construct. These data suggest the PKC pathway
impinges on the AhR regulatory circuit and that the effects of PMA vary
depending on the tissue type, cell line, or reporter system examined.
Overall, little is known about the ability of protein kinases to
regulate the activity of the AhR or ARNT. However, studies conducted by
Chen and Tukey (1996)
and by Carrier et al. (1992)
have made
significant contributions toward understanding the role of PKC in these
processes by demonstrating PKC activity is required for AhR-mediated
signal transduction. In addition, in the study of Chen and Tukey, they
eliminated some candidate mechanisms by which PKC could be involved in
AhR-mediated signal transduction. The data presented here demonstrate a
PKC-mediated event is required for the hAhR to form a functional
transcriptional complex that leads to trans-activation and
that stimulation of PKC with PMA leads to an enhancement in
TCDD-induced, AhR-mediated trans-activation relative to
cells treated with TCDD alone. Importantly, the DRE is found to be the
minimal DNA element required for PMA to enhance AhR-mediated
trans-activation.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents.
Glycerol, acrylamide, and bisacrylamide were
purchased from Research Organics (Cleveland, OH). Goat anti-mouse IgG
(Fc specific) antibodies, biotin-SP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Fc
specific), and streptavidin were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch
Laboratories (West Grove, PA). Na[125I] was
obtained from Amersham Life Science (Cleveland, OH). The use of
Iodo-Beads (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL) in the iodination of either
goat anti-mouse IgG (Fc specific) or streptavidin was as described by
the manufacturer. PVDF membrane was obtained from Millipore (Bedford,
MA). Restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were from New England
Biolabs (Beverly, MA). [
-32P]ATP was from
Amersham Life Science. BSA,
NF, DMSO, phorbol, 4-O-methyl-PMA, PMA,
8-bromo-cAMP, Bis I, and Chel were from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
TCDD was obtained from Steven Safe, Texas A & M University (College
Station, TX). All other reagents, unless otherwise specified, were
obtained from Sigma Chemical.
Plasmids.
The pCI-neo, pGL3-Control, and pGL3-Basic vectors
were from Promega (Madison, WI). The pREP4
EBNA-1 vector (a gift from
Dr. D. M. Wojchowski) is a derivative of pREP4 (InVitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) in which the EBNA-1 and OriP loci
have been deleted by AvrII and XbaI restriction
and religation of these compatible ends. The pGUDLUC6.1 vector (a gift
from Dr. M. S. Denison, University of California, Davis) was
prepared by subcloning a 1810-bp HindIII fragment isolated
from the plasmid pGUDLUC1.1 into the HindIII site located 5'
to luc+ in the pGL3-Basic vector (Garrison
et al., 1996
). This 1810-bp, HindIII fragment
contains a portion of the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal
repeat, inclusive of the viral promoter but lacking functional
glucocorticoid-responsive elements, as well as an 480-bp fragment
isolated from the 5'-flanking region of the murine CYP1A1 gene that
contains four DREs and no other known or identifiable response elements
(Lee et al., 1984
). This 480-bp fragment confers TCDD
responsiveness on the mouse mammary tumor virus viral promoter and a
luciferase reporter gene (Garrison et al., 1996
). All
plasmids were propagated in Escherichia coli strain DH5
(supE44
lacU169 (
80 lacZ
M15)
hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96
thi-1 relA1).
Cell culture and transient transfections.
FBS was obtained
from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan, UT). OPTI-MEM was from Life
Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Trypsin/EDTA, PBS, and
-MEM were
from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). HeLa (a gift from Dr. Jeffery
Ross, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Madison, WI) and HepG2
(American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) cells were grown in
-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml
streptomycin at 37° in 94% air/6% CO2. Stably
transfected cell lines were propagated in growth media containing 75 µg/ml hygromycin (Calbiochem-Novabiochem International, San Diego,
CA) as the selective agent. HeLa cells to be transiently transfected
were grown to 80% confluency in 60 × 15-mm tissue culture plates
and transfected with 3 µg of DNA/dish using LipofectAMINE (Life
Technologies) as described by the manufacturer.
Luciferase assays. Cells were grown as described to 80% confluency in 24-well tissue culture trays and washed twice with PBS before lysis. Cell lysates were prepared and assayed for luciferase activity using the Promega Luciferase Assay System as specified by the manufacturer. Light output was measured for 15 sec at 25° using a TD-20e Luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA) and luciferase activity was expressed as relative light units/µg of protein. Protein content was determined using the BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical).
Generation of the P5A11, P2D12, and P1B12 cell lines.
HeLa
cells were grown as described previously, in 100 × 20-mm tissue
culture dishes to 80% confluency. The ProFection Mammalian Transfection System (Promega) was used, as described by the
manufacturer, to transfect cells by the calcium phosphate method with
20 and 6 µg of XmnI-linearized pGUDLUC6.1 and
pREP4
EBNA-1, respectively. At 24 hr after transfection, cells were
split 1:8 into 100 × 20-mm tissue culture dishes and allowed to
proliferate for 96 hr without selection. Stably transfected cells were
selected with growth media containing 300 µg/ml hygromycin for 3 weeks; media was changed every 72 hr. Surviving after expansion were
screened for stable integration of pGUDLUC6.1 by incubation with growth
media containing 100 µM
NF for 24 hr. After
NF
treatment, cells were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity as
described earlier.
Generation of the HG40/6 cell line. HepG2 cells were grown as described in 100 × 20-mm tissue culture dishes to 80% confluency. The ProFection Mammalian Transfection System (Promega) was used, as described by the manufacturer, to transfect cells by the calcium phosphate method with 5 and 20 µg of pCI-neo and XmnI-linearized pGUDLUC6.1, respectively. At 40 hr after transfection cells were split 1:40 into 100 × 20 mm tissue culture dishes and allowed to proliferate for 24 hr without selection. Stably transfected cells were selected with growth media containing 600 µg/ml G418 for 3 weeks; media was changed every 72 hr. Surviving colonies after expansion were screened for stable integration of pGUDLUC6.1 by incubation with growth media containing 10 nM TCDD for 24 hr. After TCDD treatment, cells were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity as described earlier.
Preparation of cellular extracts. P5A11 cells were grown as described to 80% confluency in 175-cm2 tissue culture flasks, washed twice with PBS, and serum fasted for 14 hr before treatment. Immediately before the addition of compounds, BSA was added to a final concentration of 5 mg/ml. Cells treated with the PKC inhibitors Bis I or Chel were preincubated with these compounds for 15 min before exposure to DMSO, TCDD, or PMA. Cells were incubated with the compounds for 4 or 1.5 hr before the preparation of cytosolic or nuclear extracts, respectively. Cells were harvested using trypsin/EDTA, washed twice with PBS, and homogenized in MENG-Mo [25 mM MOPS, 2 mM EDTA, 0.02% NaN3, 10% glycerol, and 20 mM Na2MoO4·2H2O, pH 7.4] with 40 strokes in a Dura-Grind Dounce tissue homogenizer (Wheaton Instruments, Millville, NJ) at 4°. Cell disruption was confirmed by microscopic examination of lysates. Nuclear pellets were isolated by centrifugation of the cell lysates at 1,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min to obtain the cytosolic fraction. The nuclear pellet was resuspended and washed three times with MENG-Mo and once with MENG-Mo containing 50 mM NaCl. High salt nuclear extracts were prepared by suspension of the nuclear pellet in an equal volume of MENG-Mo containing 1 M NaCl, incubation of this suspension at 4° for 1 hr, and then centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 hr. Total protein in cytosolic and nuclear fractions was determined with the BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical).
Quantitative assay for the AhR and ARNT proteins.
Protein
samples were separated by tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis on an 8.0% polyacrylamide tricine gel, after which
the proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane (Millipore). Transfers were performed at 8 V for 6 hr in a Genie electroblot unit (Idea Scientific, Minneapolis, MN) in
transfer buffer [20 mM Tris, 185 mM glycine,
20% (v/v) methanol]. After protein transfer, the membrane was blocked
with 3% (w/v) BSA in PBS containing 10 mM
Na2HPO4, 150 mM
NaCl, and 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20 for 30 min at 25°. The blots were
rinsed once in blot wash buffer consisting of 0.1% (w/v) BSA in PBS
containing 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20. The AhR- (Rpt 1) and ARNT- (2B10)
specific mAbs used in these experiments were generated as described
previously (Hord and Perdew, 1994
; Perdew et al., 1995
).
Blots were incubated with mAb Rpt 1 (0.5 µg/ml) or 2B10 for 1 hr at
room temperature, followed by three 10-min rinses with blot wash
buffer. mAb Rpt 1- or 2B10-probed blots then were incubated with
125I-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (0.5 µg/ml, Fc
fragment specific) or biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (0.5 µg/ml, Fc
fragment specific) for 1 hr at 25°, followed by three 10-min rinses
with blot wash buffer. Blots probed with biotinylated goat anti-mouse
IgG then were incubated with [125I]streptavidin
(1.0 µg/ml) for 1 hr at 25°, followed by three 10-min rinses with
blot wash buffer. Probed blots were dried, and visualization was
performed by autoradiography or with a BioRad (Hercules, CA) GS-363
Molecular Imager System PhosphorImager system. Quantification of
125I-labeled bands in phosphoimaged blots
was performed using Molecular Analyst software (version 1.4;
BioRad).
DRE-specific EMSA.
DRE-specific EMSAs were performed with
high salt nuclear extracts isolated from P5A11 cells treated with DMSO,
TCDD, PMA, and Chel as described. The assay system used essentially was
as described previously (Singh et al., 1996
). Wild-type DRE
oligonucleotides of sequences 5'-GATCTGGCTCTTCTCACGCAACTCCG-3' and
3'-ACCGAGAAGAGTGCGTTGAGGCCTAG-5' were gifts from Dr. M. S. Denison. The final composition of the assay mix was 25 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 21.6 ng/µl poly(dI/dC), 5 mM dithiothreitol, 4 mM
MgCl2, 4 mM spermidine, and 2.5%
(w/v) CHAPS. Nuclear extracts (5.3 µg of protein) were incubated with
the assay mix for 15 min at 25°, followed by the addition of 0.1875 ng of 32P-end-labeled, wild-type DRE and
incubation for an additional 15 min at 25°. The specificity of the
binding was assessed by incorporating 100-fold molar excess of
unlabeled, wild-type DRE into the assay system. The final assay volume
was 25 µl for all samples. Then, 2.5 µl of 0.25% (w/v) xylene
cyanol in 20% (w/v) Ficoll was added to each sample. Samples were
loaded onto a nondenaturing 4% polyacrylamide TAE gel and separated by
electrophoresis. Gels were dried and visualized with a BioRad GS-363
Molecular Imager System PhosphorImager and Molecular Analyst software.
Quantification of shifted bands was performed using the Molecular
Analyst software.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of TCDD, PMA, and PMA structural analogs on hAhR-mediated
trans-activation in P5A11 cells.
The P5A11 cell
line was generated by stably transfecting HeLa cells with the
pGUDLUC6.1 minimal DRE/luciferase reporter construct to examine rapidly
the effects of various biologically active compounds on AhR-mediated
signal transduction. To confirm the TCDD responsiveness of the stably
transfected minimal DRE/luciferase reporter construct pGUDLUC6.1 and to
begin to examine the role PKC plays in AhR-mediated signal
transduction, P5A11 cells were treated with TCDD, PMA, and PMA
structural analogs. In an attempt to examine the early effects of PKC
stimulation on the AhR responsive luciferase reporter a short, 4-hr
time course was selected. Dose-response experiments demonstrate that
the stably transfected pGUDLUC6.1 reporter construct is
trans-activated in a saturating, TCDD dose-dependent manner
in the P5A11 cell line and that the saturated response begins at 1 nM TCDD (Long WP, unpublished observations). Dose-response experiments in which P5A11 cells were treated with increasing doses of
PMA, a PKC activator, in the presence of 1 nM TCDD
demonstrated that the stably transfected reporter is
trans-activated in a saturating, PMA dose-dependent manner
and that saturation is reached at 81 nM PMA (Long WP,
unpublished observations). It is important to note that this value is
in the range in which PMA typically is found to stimulate PKC in
vivo (Iizuka et al., 1989
; Chen and Tukey, 1996
). To
examine further the effects of PMA on trans-activation of
the DRE/luciferase reporter construct, P5A11 cells were treated with
DMSO, 1 nM TCDD, 81 nM PMA, 81 nM
phorbol, or 81 nM 4-O-methyl-PMA as indicated (Fig.
1) and assayed for luciferase. Treatment
of P5A11 cells with 1 nM TCDD results in a 3.8-fold
increase in trans-activation of the reporter construct
relative to cells treated with DMSO alone (Fig. 1). Simultaneous
treatment of P5A11 cells with 1 nM TCDD and 81 nM PMA results in a 3.5- fold increase in
trans-activation of the reporter construct relative to cells
treated with 1 nM TCDD alone (Fig. 1) (i.e., PMA is
enhancing AhR-mediated trans-activation of the reporter
construct; also referred to as the "PMA effect"). Phorbol, the
biologically inactive, parent compound of PMA, and 4-O-methyl-PMA,
which weakly stimulates PKC (Iizuka et al., 1989
), were used
at concentrations of 81 nM to determine whether the phorbol
ring structure of PMA was responsible for the PMA effect in P5A11
cells. Fig. 1 demonstrates that P5A11s treated with 81 nM
phorbol or 81 nM 4-O-methyl-PMA alone had only basal
expression levels of reporter relative to DMSO-treated controls. As
expected, substitution of 81 nM phorbol for 81 nM PMA and cotreatment of cells with 1 nM TCDD
results in reporter levels identical to those in cells treated with 1 nM TCDD alone (Fig. 1). In addition, as expected,
substitution of 81 nM 4-O-methyl-PMA for 81 nM
PMA in cells treated with 1 nM TCDD resulted in an enhanced
trans-activation effect intermediate to that seen in P5A11s
treated with 1 nM TCDD and 81 nM PMA (Fig. 1).
Furthermore, the PKA activator 8-bromo-cAMP had no effect on
AhR-mediated trans-activation (Pray-Grant M, unpublished
observations; Hei et al., 1991
). These results demonstrate that the P5A11 cell line is a sensitive, TCDD-responsive model system
suitable for examination of the role of PKC in AhR-mediated signal
transduction. These data also confirm that the phorbol ring structure
of PMA is not responsible for the PMA effect but that instead the
12-myristate and 13-acetate moieties of PMA, which mimic the
conformation of the acyl side chains in
sn-1,2-diacylglycerol and thus stimulate PKC activity, seem
to be responsible for the PMA effect. Last, these data suggest that
PMA/DAG-binding PKC isoforms, but not PKA, impinge on the AhR pathway.
|
Effect of TCDD and PMA on hAhR-mediated trans-activation in the P2D12 and P1B12 cell lines. Before proceeding with a detailed examination of the PMA effect, it was necessary to confirm that the effect was not a clonal artifact unique to the P5A11 cell line. Cells from the independently derived, stably transfected cell lines P2D12 and P1B12 were treated with DMSO, 1 nM TCDD, or 81 nM PMA as indicated (Fig. 2). The P2D12 and P1B12 cell lines are nonresponsive to DMSO and 81 nM PMA alone (Fig. 2); in addition, the cells respond as expected to 1 nM TCDD. Importantly, treatment of these cell lines simultaneously with 1 nM TCDD and 81 nM PMA (Fig. 2) results in an enhanced trans-activation effect like that observed in similar experiments performed using P5A11 cells (Fig. 1). These results demonstrate that the PMA effect is not a clonal artifact unique to the P5A11 cell line and that further investigation of this effect in the P5A11 cell line was warranted.
|
Transient transfection of HeLa cells with the pGL3-Control
vector.
HeLa cells, the parent cell line of the P5A11 line, were
transfected transiently with the pGL3-Control vector to address the possibilities that the PMA effect is due to fortuitous, PMA-responsive TREs in the pGL3 vector series or that the effect occurs through a
luciferase message/gene product stabilization mechanism (Reifel-Miller et al., 1996
). The pGL3-Control vector contains SV40
promoter and enhancer sequences and constitutively expresses
luciferase. HeLa cells were grown; transfected with the pGL3-Control
vector; and treated with DMSO, 81 nM PMA, 1 nM
TCDD, or both compounds as indicated (Fig.
3),and cell extracts were assayed for
luciferase. No differences in luciferase activities were observed
between these treatments (Fig. 3), suggesting that the PMA effect is
not due to a luciferase message/gene product stabilization mechanism. In addition, no PMA-responsive TRE elements seem to be present in the
pGL3 vector series. Last, these results suggest the PMA effect does not
involve the basal transcription machinery.
|
Effects of PKC inhibitors on AhR-mediated
trans-activation in P5A11 cells.
The effects of the
specific PKC inhibitors Chel and Bis I on trans-activation
of the pGUDLUC6.1 reporter construct were examined in the P5A11 cell
line to confirm further that the PMA effect is due to stimulation of
PKC activity (Herbert et al., 1990
; Toullec et
al., 1991
). Chel and Bis I doses used in this experiment were from
dose-response experiments in which P5A11 cells were pretreated for 15 min with increasing doses of Chel or Bis I followed by cotreatment with
1 nM TCDD and 81 nM PMA for 4 hr, at which time luciferase assays were performed (Long WP, unpublished observations). These dose-response experiments demonstrated that the PMA effect could
be abolished in a dose-dependent manner by both Chel and Bis I and that
the minimal inhibitor doses required to abolish the PMA effect are 3 and 4 µM for Chel and Bis I, respectively. P5A11 cells
were treated with DMSO, 1 nM TCDD, 81 nM PMA, 3 µM Chel, or 4 µM Bis I as indicated (Fig.
4) and assayed for luciferase. Fig. 4
clearly shows that the PKC inhibitors Chel and Bis I specifically abolish the PMA effect. Importantly, treatment of P5A11 cells with
these PKC-specific inhibitors and 1 nM TCDD eliminated
AhR-mediated trans-activation of the reporter construct
(Fig. 4). These results demonstrate that PMA is specifically activating
PKC to generate the PMA effect and indicate that a PKC-mediated
phosphorylation event is required for the AhR signaling pathway to
function.
|
Effects of TCDD, PMA, PMA analogs, and PKC inhibitors on hAhR-mediated trans-activation in HG40/6 cells. HG40/6 cells, a HepG2-derived cell line, were treated with TCDD, PMA, PMA structural analogs, and PKC inhibitors to address the possibility that the PMA effect is cell line dependent. HG40/6 cells were treated with 5 nM TCDD, 81 nM PMA, 81 nM phorbol, 81 nM 4-O-methyl-PMA, 4.6 µM Chel, or 4.0 µM Bis I as indicated (Fig. 5); doses were optimized by conducting dose-response experiments (Tsai J, unpublished observations). Treatment of HG40/6 cells with 5 nM TCDD (Fig. 5A) results in a 39.2-fold increase in trans-activation of the stably transfected pGUDLUC6.1 reporter construct relative to cells treated with DMSO alone. However, cotreatment of HG40/6 cells with 1 nM TCDD and 81 nM PMA (Fig. 5A) results in a 6.5-fold increase in trans-activation of the reporter construct relative to cells treated with 1 nM TCDD alone. Simultaneous treatment of HG40/6 cells with 1 nM TCDD and 81 nM phorbol (Fig. 5A) failed to generate any increase in trans-activation of the reporter construct relative to cells treated with 1 nM TCDD alone. Importantly, treatment of cells with 81 nM PMA, phorbol, or 4-O-methyl-PMA alone (Fig. 5A) does not stimulate trans-activation of the reporter construct relative to cells treated with DMSO alone. In addition, the PKC inhibitors Chel and Bis I abolished the PMA effect and impaired TCDD-induced trans-activation of the reporter construct in HG40/6 cells (Fig. 5B). These data demonstrate that the PMA effect is not unique to HeLa-derived cell lines, such as the P5A11 line, but instead also occurs in the HepG2-derived HG40/6 cell line and thus seems to be cell line independent. Taken together, these data further suggest a PKC-mediated event is required for AhR-mediated trans-activation.
|
Examination of cytosolic hAhR and hARNT levels in treated P5A11
cells.
Quantification of cytosolic hAhR and hARNT levels was
performed to examine the possibility that Chel and PMA treatments
generate their effects by altering cytosolic levels of these proteins. Quantitative autoradiography of Western blots probed with the mAbs
RPT-1 and 2B10 was performed as indicated (Figs.
6 and 7) to
quantify hAhR and hARNT levels in cytosols from treated P5A11 cells.
These data (Figs. 6 and 7) demonstrate that Chel does not abolish the
enhanced trans-activation effect by promoting
down-regulation of the hAhR or hARNT. Furthermore, Chel and PMA
treatments do not drastically alter cytosolic levels of the hAhR
relative to P5A11 cells treated with DMSO alone (Fig. 6.). In addition,
PMA and Chel treatments (Fig. 6) do not prevent TCDD-induced
down-regulation of the hAhR (Reick et al., 1994
).
Together, these data demonstrate that the PMA effect does not occur as
a result of an increase in hAhR or hARNT levels or by some mechanism
that impairs TCDD-induced down-regulation of the hAhR.
|
|
hAhR levels and hAhR/hARNT heterodimer DRE-binding activities in
nuclear extracts from treated P5A11 cells.
Alteration of nuclear
hAhR levels or hAhR/hARNT heterodimer DRE-binding activity in the
nuclear compartment are two possible mechanisms by which the PMA effect
may occur. To begin to address these possibilities, a control
experiment was performed in which P5A11 cells were treated as indicated
in Fig. 8 and assayed for luciferase
(Long WP, unpublished observations). This control experiment confirms
that the PMA effect occurs when nuclear hAhR levels in TCDD-treated
HeLa cells are maximal (Singh et al., 1996
); in addition, the PKC inhibitor Chel abolishes the PMA effect and TCDD-induced trans-activation of the reporter when P5A11 cells are
treated as indicated in Fig. 8. After these control experiments,
nuclear extracts were prepared from P5A11 cells treated with 10 nM TCDD, 81 nM PMA, or 4 µM Chel
as indicated (Fig. 8), and quantitative autoradiography (Fig. 8A) of
Western blots probed with the mAb RPT-1 was performed. These
quantitative Western blots (Fig. 8) indicate that the PMA effect is not
due to a drastic increase in nuclear hAhR levels and that Chel does not
abolish TCDD-induced trans-activation of the reporter
construct by preventing the hAhR from translocating into the nucleus.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Currently, the mechanism by which PKC modulates AhR-mediated
signal transduction is poorly understood. However, studies conducted by
Carrier et al. (1992)
and Chen and Tukey (1996)
demonstrated that a PKC-mediated signaling event is required for AhR-mediated signal
transduction. We generated HeLa- and HepG2-derived cell lines stably
transfected with the minimal DRE/luciferase reporter construct
pGUDLUC6.1 as a tool with which to build on the findings of these
earlier studies regarding the role of PKC in AhR-mediated signal
transduction. Previous reports addressed this issue by using the
endogenous CYP1A1 gene as a reporter or used reporter constructs in
which large portions of the 5'-regulatory region of the CYP1A1 gene
were linked to CAT or luciferase reporter genes (Okino et
al., 1992
; Reiners et al., 1992
; Berghard et
al., 1993
; Moore et al., 1993
; Chen and Tukey, 1996
).
One limitation of such approaches is that CYP1A1 is an endogenous gene
in mammalian cells and its activity and expression in the cell likely
are regulated by mechanisms occurring at the levels of transcription
initiation, transcript stability, translational, or enzymatic activity
levels like other cytochrome P450s (Kloepper-Sams and Stegeman, 1989
; Ko et al., 1996
). In contrast to the stably transfected
reporter construct used by Chen and Tukey, the pGUDLUC6.1 reporter
construct, used in this study, contains four DREs and no other know
regulatory elements that make this minimal DRE/luciferase reporter
construct ideal for the examination of the role of PKC in AhR-mediated
transcriptional regulation.
Consistent with the observations of others, stimulation of PKC activity
with PMA, a potent activator of DAG-binding PKC isoforms (Nishizuka,
1995
), and the AhR pathway with TCDD in P5A11 and HG40/6 cells results
in a several-fold enhancement in trans-activation of the
stably transfected pGUDLUC6.1 reporter construct relative to cells
treated with 1 nM TCDD alone. Importantly, this study demonstrates that the PMA effect in P5A11 cells is not a clonal artifact (Fig. 2) and was not unique to HeLa-derived cell lines (Fig.
5). Previously, Chen and Tukey (1996)
suggested a possible mechanism by
which PKC stimulation by PMA promotes the formation of DNA-binding AP-1
complexes, which then act in conjunction with the DRE-associated
AhR/ARNT heterodimer to enhance transcription of AhR-responsive genes.
This candidate mechanism is unlikely to contribute to the PMA effect in
the P5A11 and HG40/6 cell lines because the stably transfected
pGUDLUC6.1 reporter construct has no known AP-1 sites in the promoter
region located 5' to the luciferase reporter (Angel and Karin, 1991
).
Treatments of P5A11 and HG40/6 cells with PMA structural analogs (Figs.
1 and 5A) implicate the 12-myristate and 13-acetate moieties of PMA,
which mimics the conformation of the acyl side chains in
sn-1,2-diacylglycerol a compound required in vivo
for stimulation of DAG-binding PKC isoforms, as required for the PMA
effect. In addition, the PMA effect was abolished by the specific PKC
inhibitors Chel and Bis I, which also abolished AhR-mediated
trans-activation, but not the PKA activator 8-bromo-cAMP
(Pray-Grant M, unpublished observations). These data are consistent
with previous findings, thus further demonstrating that the PMA effect
is due to stimulation of a DAG-binding PKC activity and that a
PKC-mediated event is required for AhR-mediated trans-activation (Chen and Tukey, 1996
). Importantly, our
data demonstrate that the PMA effect is not a clonal artifact or unique to HeLa- or HepG2-derived cell lines.
The mechanism by which PMA-induced PKC stimulation results in the PMA
effect may be through alteration of cellular levels of the hAhR or
hARNT (Puga et al., 1992
), TCDD induced down-regulation of
the hAhR, hAhR/hARNT heterodimer DRE-binding activity, the activity of
coactivators, or the basal transcription machinery itself. As
demonstrated quantitatively in Fig. 6, TCDD-induced down-regulation of
the AhR is unaffected by PMA or Chel treatments, demonstrating that
this mechanism is not responsible for the PMA effect in P5A11 cells.
Furthermore, the quantitative analyses in Figs. 6 and 7 demonstrate
that 81 nM PMA alone does not alter AhR or ARNT levels in
the cell sufficiently to account for the fold enhancement in
trans-activation of the reporter construct, relative to
TCDD-treated cells, which occurs during the PMA effect in P5A11 cells.
The observation that Chel (Figs. 6 and 7) does not decrease AhR or ARNT
levels in the cytosolic fraction of P5A11 cells relative to
DMSO-treated cells demonstrates that this PKC inhibitor does not
abolish the PMA effect or TCDD-induced AhR signal transduction by
decreasing AhR or ARNT levels in the cell. Quantitative examination of
nuclear AhR levels (Fig. 8), under conditions in which nuclear hAhR
levels are maximal in HeLa cells (Singh et al., 1996
),
revealed that the PMA effect is not the result of increased nuclear
translocation of the AhR, which is consistent with EMSA data generated
previously (Chen and Tukey, 1996
). This experiment (Fig. 8) also
revealed that Chel does not abolish the PMA effect or TCDD-mediated AhR
signal transduction by preventing the hAhR from translocating into the
nucleus. EMSAs performed using nuclear extracts from treated P5A11
cells (Fig. 9) demonstrate that the PMA effect is not due to an
increase in nuclear hAhR/hARNT heterodimer DRE-binding activity
relative to cells treated with 1 nM TCDD alone, which also
is consistent with EMSA data generated previously (Chen and Tukey,
1996
). Quantification of the shifted, 32P-labeled
DRE complex (Fig. 9B) suggests that PMA treatments cause a decrease in
DRE-binding activity, although EMSA is not an ideal method for
obtaining quantitative data. In addition, the mechanism by which the
inhibitor Chel abolishes the PMA effect and TCDD-mediated signal
transduction does not seem to involve a reduction in nuclear hAhR/hARNT
heterodimer DRE-binding activity (Fig. 9). Fig. 3 demonstrates that the
PMA effect is not due to a luciferase gene/message stabilization mechanism or a fortuitous, PMA-responsive TRE in the pGL3-vector series
(Reifel-Miller et al., 1996
). Importantly, Fig. 3 also demonstrates that PMA stimulation of PKC does not seem to affect the
basal transcription machinery, which previously had been suggested as
an explanation for the PMA effect (Chen and Tukey, 1996
). Furthermore, it seems that the PMA effect may be due to an event-mediated directly by PKC, because the effect occurs as early as 1.5 hr after PMA treatment (Long WP, unpublished observations). Based on these data, and
consistent with the studies of others, the most likely mechanism by
which the PMA effect occurs may be through a PKC-mediated event that
alters the ability of the AhR/ARNT complex to recruit coactivators or
through a direct effect on a specific coactivator involved in AhR/ARNT
directed assembly of transcription complexes.
A related explanation for the PMA effect is that stimulation of PKC by
PMA alters cellular phosphorylation patterns and results in alterations
in the activities of proteins involved in the basal transcription
machinery and chromatin structure (Chen and Tukey, 1996
). Although
possible, this seems unlikely because in transient transfections of
HeLa cells with the pGL3-Control vector (Fig. 3), the basal expression
levels of luciferase are unaffected by PMA treatments. In addition, PMA
has no effect by itself (Fig. 1) on basal expression levels of
luciferase in P5A11 cells, which constitutively have detectable nuclear
levels of the hAhR and hAhR/hARNT heterodimer (Figs. 8 and 9; Singh
et al., 1996
). Although not entirely eliminating the
possibility that the PMA effect is due to a more "open" chromatin
structure, these experiments make this alternative explanation seem
unlikely.
In summary, we generated HeLa- and HepG2-derived cell lines, the P5A11
and HG40/6 cell lines, stably transfected with the minimal
DRE/luciferase reporter construct pGUDLUC6.1, that are suitable for
screening the effects of biologically active compounds on AhR-mediated
signal transduction. Data generated using these model systems indicate
that PKC activity is required for the AhR to direct assembly of a fully
functional transcription complex, a finding consistent with the studies
of others (Carrier et al., 1992
; Schafer et al.,
1993
; Chen and Tukey, 1996
; Li and Dougherty, 1997
). The exact PKC
isoforms and classes involved in this process, however, are unresolved
because PMA activates both conventional isoform category PKCs and novel
isoform category PKCs. Furthermore, the specific PKC inhibitors Chel
and Bis I, used here, have not been shown to inhibit preferentially the
activity of a particular PKC isoform or isoform class. It also should
be noted that in light of our data and those of others, the activation
requirements and differential expression of PKC isoforms in specific
cell types and tissues may make an important contribution to the
cell-specific modulation of AhR activity in different tissues and
during development.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. M. S. Denison (University of California, Davis
CA) for his generous gift of the pGUDLUC6.1 vector, Dr. Steven Safe
(Texas A & M University, College Station, TX) for his gift of TCDD, and
Dr. D. M. Wojchowski (Pennsylvania State University, State
College, PA) for his gift of the pREP4
EBNA-1 vector.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received September 26, 1997; Accepted January 6, 1998
This work was supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Science Grant ES04869.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Gary H. Perdew, Department of Veterinary Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 115 Henning Building, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: ghp2{at}psu.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PKC, protein kinase C;
hAhR, human aryl
hydrocarbon receptor;
DRE, dioxin-responsive element;
TCDD, 2,3,7,8,-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin;
PMA, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate;
hARNT, human aryl hydrocarbon receptor
nuclear translocator protein;
HSP90, 90-kDa heat shock protein;
HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
PAS, PER/ARNT/SIM
(periodicity/aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator
protein/simple-minded) ;
DAG, sn-1,2-diacylglycerol;
NF,
- naphthoflavone;
8-bromo-cAMP, 8-bromoadenosine-cAMP;
Bis I, bisindolylmaleimide I·HCl;
Chel, chelerythrine chloride;
FBS, fetal
bovine serum;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
-MEM,
-minimum
essential media;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
4-O-methyl-PMA, 4-O-methyl-phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate;
PKA, protein
kinase A;
TRE, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-responsive element;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide;
MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]propanesulfonate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-naphthoflavone.
Arch Biochem Biophys
268:
525-535[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Dong, T. P. Dalton, M. L. Miller, Y. Chen, S. Uno, Z. Shi, H. G. Shertzer, S. Bansal, N. G. Avadhani, and D. W. Nebert Knock-In Mouse Lines Expressing either Mitochondrial or Microsomal CYP1A1: Differing Responses to Dietary Benzo[a]pyrene as Proof of Principle Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2009; 75(3): 555 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Christopher. R. Chiaro, R. D. Patel, and Gary. H. Perdew 12(R)-Hydroxy-5(Z),8(Z),10(E),14(Z)-eicosatetraenoic Acid [12(R)-HETE], an Arachidonic Acid Derivative, Is an Activator of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2008; 74(6): 1649 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Zimmermann, E. A. King, E. Dengler, S. R. Scogin, and W. H. Powell An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Repressor from Xenopus laevis: Function, Expression, and Role in Dioxin Responsiveness during Frog Development Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2008; 104(1): 124 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Hollingshead, T. V. Beischlag, B. C. DiNatale, P. Ramadoss, and G. H. Perdew Inflammatory Signaling and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mediate Synergistic Induction of Interleukin 6 in MCF-7 Cells Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3609 - 3617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Biswas, S. Srinivasan, H. K. Anandatheerthavarada, and N. G. Avadhani Dioxin-mediated tumor progression through activation of mitochondria-to-nucleus stress signaling PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 186 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Chiaro, R. D. Patel, C. B. Marcus, and G. H. Perdew Evidence for an Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Mediated Cytochrome P450 Autoregulatory Pathway Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2007; 72(5): 1369 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Ciolino, C. J. MacDonald, O. S. Memon, S. E. Bass, and G. C. Yeh Sulindac regulates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated expression of Phase 1 metabolic enzymes in vivo and in vitro Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2006; 27(8): 1586 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N'Diaye, E. Le Ferrec, D. Lagadic-Gossmann, S. Corre, D. Gilot, V. Lecureur, P. Monteiro, C. Rauch, M.-D. Galibert, and O. Fardel Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor- and Calcium-dependent Induction of the Chemokine CCL1 by the Environmental Contaminant Benzo[a]pyrene J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 19906 - 19915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Schreiber, C. Kohle, F. Buckler, S. Schmohl, A. Braeuning, A. Schmiechen, M. Schwarz, and P. A. Munzel REGULATION OF CYP1A1 GENE EXPRESSION BY THE ANTIOXIDANT TERT-BUTYLHYDROQUINONE Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2006; 34(7): 1096 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Petersen, S. Krishnan, and E. D. Hudgens The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway and Sexual Differentiation of Neuroendocrine Functions Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): s33 - s42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tsuchiya, M. Nakajima, S. Takagi, M. Katoh, W. Zheng, C. R Jefcoate, and T. Yokoi Binding of Steroidogenic Factor-1 to the Regulatory Region Might Not Be Critical for Transcriptional Regulation of the Human CYP1B1 Gene. J. Biochem., March 1, 2006; 139(3): 527 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Lavine, A. J. Rowatt, T. Klimova, A. J. Whitington, E. Dengler, C. Beck, and W. H. Powell Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors in the Frog Xenopus laevis: Two AhR1 Paralogs Exhibit Low Affinity for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2005; 88(1): 60 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Broccardo, R. E. Billings, M. E. Andersen, and W. H. Hanneman Probing the Control Elements of the CYP1A1 Switching Module in H4IIE Hepatoma Cells Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2005; 88(1): 82 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. W. Machemer and R. H. Tukey The Role of Protein Kinase C in Regulation of TCDD-Mediated CYP1A1 Gene Expression Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2005; 87(1): 27 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mulero-Navarro, E. Pozo-Guisado, P. A. Perez-Mancera, A. Alvarez-Barrientos, I. Catalina-Fernandez, E. Hernandez-Nieto, J. Saenz-Santamaria, N. Martinez, J. M. Rojas, I. Sanchez-Garcia, et al. Immortalized Mouse Mammary Fibroblasts Lacking Dioxin Receptor Have Impaired Tumorigenicity in a Subcutaneous Mouse Xenograft Model J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28731 - 28741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chen, T. Operana, J. Bonzo, N. Nguyen, and R. H. Tukey ERK Kinase Inhibition Stabilizes the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION AND PROTEIN DEGRADATION J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4350 - 4359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Minsavage, S.-k. Park, and T. A. Gasiewicz The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Tyrosine 9, a Residue That Is Essential for AhR DNA Binding Activity, Is Not a Phosphoresidue but Augments AhR Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 20582 - 20593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Lai, M. H. Wong, and C. K. C. Wong Modulation of AhR-Mediated CYP1A1 mRNA and EROD Activities by 17{beta}-Estradiol and Dexamethasone in TCDD-Induced H411E Cells Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2004; 78(1): 41 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. MacDonald, H. P. Ciolino, and G. C. Yeh The Drug Salicylamide Is an Antagonist of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor That Inhibits Signal Transduction Induced by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 64(1): 429 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Karchner, D. G. Franks, W. H. Powell, and M. E. Hahn Regulatory Interactions among Three Members of the Vertebrate Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Family: AHR Repressor, AHR1, and AHR2 J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 6949 - 6959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Jensen and M. E. Hahn cDNA Cloning and Characterization of a High Affinity Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in a Cetacean, the Beluga, Delphinapterus leucas Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2001; 64(1): 41 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yu, V. Hebbar, D. W. Kim, S. Mandlekar, J. M. Pezzuto, and A.-N. T. Kong Resveratrol Inhibits Phorbol Ester and UV-Induced Activator Protein 1 Activation by Interfering with Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2001; 60(1): 217 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. MacDonald, H. P. Ciolino, and G. C. Yeh Dibenzoylmethane Modulates Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Function and Expression of Cytochromes P450 1A1, 1A2, and 1B1 Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 61(10): 3919 - 3924. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Correction for vol. 97, p. 12475 PNAS, January 2, 2001; 98(1): 379 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hukkanen, A. Lassila, K. Päivärinta, S. Valanne, S. Sarpo, J. Hakkola, O. Pelkonen, and H. Raunio Induction and Regulation of Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Cytochrome P450s in the Human A549 Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Line Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2000; 22(3): 360 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Ciolino and G. C. Yeh Inhibition of Aryl Hydrocarbon-Induced Cytochrome P-450 1A1 Enzyme Activity and CYP1A1 Expression by Resveratrol Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 760 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Long, X. Chen, and G. H. Perdew Protein Kinase C Modulates Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator Protein-mediated Transactivation Potential in a Dimer Context J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 1999; 274(18): 12391 - 12400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||