Vol. 54, Issue 1, 59-69, July 1998
A Crucial Role for the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway
in Nicotinic Cholinergic Signaling to Secretory Protein Transcription
in Pheochromocytoma Cells
Kechun
Tang,
Hongjiang
Wu,
Sushil K.
Mahata, and
Daniel T.
O'Connor
Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics,
University of California, and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, San Diego, California
 |
Summary |
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway plays a pivotal
role in intracellular signaling, and this cascade may impinge on cAMP
response elements (CREs) of target genes. Both the MAPK pathway and
chromogranin A expression may be activated by cytosolic calcium influx,
and calcium-dependent signals map onto the chromogranin A promoter
proximal CRE. We therefore probed the role of the MAPK pathway in
chromogranin A biosynthesis after secretory stimulation of PC12
pheochromocytoma cells by the nicotinic cholinergic pathway, the
physiological secretory trigger. Chemical inhibition of either MAPK or
MAPK kinase blocked the response of a transfected chromogranin A
promoter to nicotine or protein kinase C activation [by
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA)], although nicotine-evoked
catecholamine secretion was unaffected. Activation of the MAP kinase
cascade (Ras, Raf, MAPK, or CREB kinase) by cotransfection of pathway
components stimulated the chromogranin A promoter. Cotransfection of
MAPK pathway dominant negative mutants (for Raf, MAPK, or CREB kinase)
blocked nicotinic or PMA activation of chromogranin A, although a
dominant negative Ras mutant was without effect. MAPK pathway enzymatic
activity was stimulated by both nicotine and PMA. Point mutations of
the chromogranin A CRE suggested that this element was necessary in cis for stimulation by nicotine, PMA, or chemical
activation of the MAPK pathway. Transfer of the CRE to a heterologous
promoter conferred inducibility by not only nicotine or cAMP but also
MAPK activation. Expression of the CREB antagonist KCREB blocked the response of the chromogranin A promoter to nicotine, cAMP, or MAPK
pathway activation by either chemical stimulation or cotransfection of
active cascade components. Chromogranin A mRNA responded to MAPK
pathway manipulation in a fashion similar to the transfected chromogranin A promoter, in both direction and magnitude. We conclude that the MAPK pathway is a necessary intermediate in signaling from the
nicotinic receptor to secretory protein transcription, although not to
catecholamine secretion. In trans, this response seems
to involve the following signal cascade: protein kinase C
Raf
MAPK kinase
MAPK
CREB kinase
CREB. In cis,
activation by the cascade maps onto the chromogranin A promoter
proximal CRE, which is both necessary and sufficient to confer the
response.
 |
Introduction |
The
MAPK pathway plays an increasingly appreciated role in diverse cellular
signaling processes, including signaling of several growth factors and
hormones toward gene expression (Kyriakis and Avruch, 1996
; Treisman
et al., 1996
; Robinson et al., 1997
). Growth factor activation of the MAPK pathway may impinge onto the CREs of
target genes, with activation of CREB through phosphorylation by CREB
kinase, otherwise known as ribosomal protein S6 serine kinase 2 (Rsk2;
Xing et al., 1996
), which is in turn activated through
phosphorylation by MAPK (Xing et al., 1996
).
In previous studies, we probed the mechanism of transcriptional
activation of the secretory granule protein chromogranin A by
stimulation of chromaffin cells through the physiological nicotinic cholinergic pathway (Tang et al., 1996
, 1997
). The
biosynthesis of chromogranin A, the major protein stored and released
by exocytosis with catecholamines (Takiyyuddin et al.,
1990
), is activated by nicotinic stimulation (Tang et al.,
1996
), and the response requires the participation of the chromogranin
A promoter CRE in cis (Tang et al., 1996
, 1997
)
and the transcription factor CREB in trans (Tang et
al., 1996
, 1997
). This response is also absolutely dependent on
cytosolic calcium influx and consequent activation of protein kinase C
(Tang et al., 1997
).
Because the MAPK cascade also can be triggered by protein kinase C
activation (Marquardt et al., 1994
), we wondered whether the
protein kinase C-dependent actions of nicotine might trigger the MAPK
pathway in chromaffin cells and whether this sequence of events might
be involved in chromaffin cell transcriptional responses to nicotinic
stimulation. Our interest was heightened not only because protein
kinase C is involved in nicotinic (Tang et al., 1997
) and
MAPK (Marquardt et al., 1994
) signaling but also because
both nicotinic (Tang et al., 1997
) and MAPK (Xing et
al., 1996
) transcriptional signals may converge on the protein CREB in trans and CREs in cis.
We therefore explored the role of the MAPK pathway in the actions of
nicotinic cholinergic stimulation to trigger secretory protein
transcription in chromaffin cells. Our results suggest that this
pathway plays a crucial (indeed indispensable) role in nicotinic
signaling to chromogranin A transcription, although not to
catecholamine secretion. Furthermore, MAPK responses use the
transcription factor CREB in trans and the chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE in cis.
 |
Materials and Methods |
Cell culture and transfections.
PC12 (Greene and Tischler,
1976
) cells (passages 10-25) were cultured and transfected by
lipofection, as described previously (Tang et al., 1996
).
Plasmids.
In plasmid pXP-1133, a functional mouse
chromogranin A promoter drives expression of a luciferase reporter (Wu
et al., 1994
); the promoter region in this plasmid extends
from
1133 bp upstream of the transcription initiation (cap) site to
+42 bp downstream of the cap site.
The mouse chromogranin A promoter CRE (CRE box; [
71
bp]5'-TGACGTAA-3'[
64 bp]) occurs at position
71 to
64 bp
upstream of the cap site. CRE box mutants M13 and M41 have been
described previously (Wu et al., 1995
). Mutant M13, in which
6 of 8 CRE bases are changed (to CATCACCA;
changes underlined), occurs in a 100-bp promoter/reporter construct
(control promoter/reporter plasmid: pXP-100). Mutant M41, a CRE
point-gap mutant (to TGA-GTAA) occurs in a 77-bp
promoter/reporter (control promoter/reporter plasmid: pXP-77).
The mouse chromogranin A promoter CRE domain (TGACGTAA), a CRE box
point mutant (TGA-GTAA), and a consensus CRE (TGACGTCA; Roesler et al., 1988
) were positioned just upstream of the
heterologous herpes simplex virus TK promoter, in a TK/luciferase
promoter/reporter (Wu et al., 1995
).
Other eukaryotic expression plasmids used in this research include (1)
wild-type human Erk1 (pCMV5Erk1), or its dominant negative mutant K71R
(pCMV5 Erk1 K71R), as well as wild-type rat Erk2 (pCMV5Erk2), or its
dominant negative mutant K52R (pCMV5 Erk2 K52R), each driven by the CMV
promoter (from John K. Westwick, University of North Carolina, Chapel
Hill, NC; Westwick et al., 1994
; Robbins et al., 1993
). (2) Wild-type rat Raf-1 (KSRSPA cRAF), or its dominant negative
mutant K375R (KS RSPA cRAF DN), each driven by the RSV-LTR promoter,
were from Michael Karin (University of California, San Diego, CA)
(Thorburn et al., 1994
). (3) Wild-type c-Ha-Ras (pCD-WTras), or its dominant negative mutant pCD-DNras (S17N), each driven by the
SV40 early promoter, were from Neil M. Nathanson (University of
Washington, Seattle, WA) (Feig and Cooper, 1988
; Feig et
al., 1986
). (4) Wild-type human CREB kinase (also called RSK2,
HA-epitope-tagged in pMT2HARSK2), or its K100R dominant negative mutant
(pMT2HARSK2KR100), each driven by the adenovirus major late promoter
(AML), were from Michael E. Greenberg (Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA) (Xing et al., 1996
). (5) The CREB dominant negative
(inhibitory) DNA binding domain point mutant KCREB, driven by the
RSV-LTR (in pRSV-KCREB), was from Richard H. Goodman (Oregon Health
Sciences University, Portland, OR) (Walton et al., 1992
).
(6) A 71-bp c-Fos promoter, which includes a "calcium response
element" at 5'-TGACGTTT-3' (
62 to
54 bp upstream of the
c-fos cap site), linked to a CAT reporter ("
71 wt fos
CAT"), was from Michael E. Greenberg (Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA) (Sheng et al., 1988
).
Assays and catecholamine secretion.
Luciferase reporter
activity was measured in cell extracts by luminometry (Dewet et
al., 1986
). In the c-fos promoter/CAT reporter study,
CAT activity was measured by incorporation of [14C]acetyl groups into chloramphenicol (Gorman
et al., 1982
). Catecholamine secretion from PC12 cells
preloaded with
[3H]-L-norepinephrine was
accomplished as described previously (Parmer et al., 1993
).
Protein was measured by the Coomassie blue dye binding assay (Bradford,
1976
).
MAPK pathway activity was measured with an MAP Kinase Assay Kit
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) (Boulton et al., 1991
; Davis,
1993
). PC12 cells (in 10-cm plates) under different experimental
conditions were harvested with PBS and then lysed with 1 ml of lysis
buffer (2.5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 2 mM Na vanadate). After pelleting cell
lysates, supernate protein concentrations were measured, and an
anti-MAPK antibody (Stratagene) was added to supernates at 1 µl/mg
protein. After a 1-hr incubation at 4°, 20 µl of protein A beads
(Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was added in lysis buffer, followed by
continued incubation for 30 min. The beads were washed three times with
lysis buffer and dissolved into a final volume of 24 µl of lysis
buffer, subsequently used for MAPK assay. Samples from the above
immunoprecipitation were mixed with
[
-32P]ATP in reaction buffer, with the MAPK
substrate PHAS-I (phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein
regulated by insulin). Mixtures were incubated at 30° for 20 min and
then electrophoresed on Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gradient gels (10-27%;
NOVEX, La Jolla, CA), followed by exposure to Kodak X-ray film at
70°. After fluorographic exposure,
32P-labeled protein bands were excised from gels
based on autoradiography, and the dpm of each band was obtained by
liquid scintillation counting.
Pharmacology.
The effect of the following agents on
transcription or secretion was tested at concentrations and times
indicated for a particular experiment. Nicotine was from Sigma
Chemical. Doses of nicotine for activation of chromogranin A
transcription (maximal at 1 mM nicotine) versus
catecholamine secretion (maximal at 60-100 µM nicotine)
were optimized by previous dose-response analyses (Tang et
al., 1996
). PMA, the MAPK inhibitor apigenin (Kuo and Yang, 1995
;
Sato et al., 1994
), the MAPK kinase inhibitor PD-98059
(Alessi et al., 1995
), and the MAPK pathway activators ATA
(Okada and Koizumi, 1995
), PAF (C16; Honda
et al., 1994
), and
N-hexanoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine (C6-ceramide; Jayadev et al., 1995
)
were obtained from Calbiochem/Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA).
Statistics.
Results are reported as the mean ± 1 standard error value. Data were analyzed by either t test
(two groups) or analysis of variance (three or more groups) using the
software packages Statworks or Cricketgraph (Cricket Software, Malvern,
PA) or StatView (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA), each for the Macintosh
microcomputer. Differences were considered significant at
p < 0.05.
 |
Results and Discussion |
Involvement of the MAPK pathway in nicotinic cholinergic signaling
to chromogranin A transcription, although not catecholamine secretion:
Effects of MAPK pathway chemical inhibitors.
We used the MAPK
pathway enzymatic activity inhibitors apigenin (MAPK inhibitor; Sato
et al., 1994
) or PD98059 (MAPK kinase inhibitor; Alessi
et al., 1995
) to probe that pathway's potential involvement
in nicotinic cholinergic signaling in PC12 cells. Both nicotine and the
protein kinase C activator PMA stimulated the transfected chromogranin
A promoter, and in each case the stimulation was substantially blunted
by inhibition of either MAPK or MEK (Table
1). The inhibitors alone (without the
activators [nicotine or PMA]) had only a modest effect on basal
expression of the transfected promoter.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Effects of MAPK pathway chemical inhibitors on nicotine-stimulated
catecholamine secretion or chromogranin A transcription in
pheochromocytoma cells
Chromogranin A transcription: After transfection of the 1133-bp mouse
chromogranin A promoter/luciferase reporter, apigenin (MAP kinase
inhibitor, 12.5 µM) or PD98059 (MAP kinase kinase
inhibitor, 20 µM) was added and incubated for 48 hr.
Nicotine (1 mM) was added at the same time as the
inhibitors, whereas PMA (0.1 µM) was added 6 hr before
cell harvest. Data shown are luciferase activity/mg of protein in
mean ± standard error for four replicates/condition.
|
|
Nicotine also activated catecholamine secretion, but neither basal nor
nicotine-stimulated catecholamine release was affected by inhibition of
either MAPK or MEK (Table 1), despite preincubation of PC12 cells with
each inhibitor for 1 hr before nicotinic secretory stimulation. Thus,
the MAPK pathway seems to be involved in the chromogranin A
transcriptional (although not the catecholamine secretory) response to
nicotine or PMA.
Activation of the MAPK pathway by cotransfection: Effect on
chromogranin A transcription.
During growth factor stimulation
(Ginty et al., 1994
), the MAPK pathway may relay signals to
the transcription factor CREB by the action of MAPK (Erk) on CREB
kinase (Rsk2), which in turn activates CREB by phosphorylation on CREB
Ser133 (Xing et al., 1996
).
We overexpressed several components of the MAPK pathway (Ras, Raf, Erk,
or RSK2; Okada and Koizumi, 1995
; Pang et al., 1995
; Johnson
and Nathanson, 1994
) in PC12 cells by cotransfection with an 1133-bp
mouse chromogranin A promoter/luciferase reporter plasmid. Each of
these components trans-activated the transfected
chromogranin A promoter (by 1.7-5.7-fold; Fig.
1) and in some cases (e.g., Raf-1 or
Erk-1) substantially augmented the chromogranin A transcriptional response to nicotine. Thus, overexpression of MAPK pathway components also can activate the chromogranin A promoter.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effects of cotransfection of MAPK pathway
expression plasmids on nicotinic cholinergic control of chromogranin A
promoter expression in pheochromocytoma cells. The 1133-bp mouse
chromogranin A promoter/luciferase reporter (3 µg/ml) was
cotransfected along with the indicated MAPK pathway expression plasmid
(3 µg/well), at 1 ml/well, in 12-well plates of PC12 cells.
Stimulation occurred over 48 hr, with nicotine (10 3
M) versus vehicle (mock). Results shown are luciferase
activity/mg sample protein [four replicates/condition; mean ± standard error; a, p < 0.05, compared with the
pBluescript (control) cotransfection group for each stimulation (same
color)]. b, p < 0.05 compared with the
unstimulated group for each cotransfection (same activator gene
coexpressed). cHa-Ras, wild-type c-Ha-Ras expression
driven by the SV40 promoter, in the plaasmid pCD-WTras;
rRaf-1, wild-type rat Raf-1 expression driven by the RSV
LTR (Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat) promoter, in the plasmid
KSRSPA cRAF, hErk-1, wild-type human Erk1 expression
driven by the CMV (cytomegalovirus) promoter, in the plasmid pCMV5Erk1;
rErk-2, wild-type rat Erk2 expression driven by the CMV
promoter, in the plasmid pCMV5Erk2; hRSK2, wild-type
human RSK2 (ribosomal serine kinase 2; CREB kinase) expression driven
by the AML (adenovirus major late promoter) in the plasmid
pMT2HARASK2.
|
|
Inhibition of the MAPK pathway by cotransfection: Effect on
chromogranin A transcription.
ATP binding domain, dominant
negative (inhibitory) point mutants have been developed for several
components of the MAPK cascade: Ras (Feig et al., 1986
; Feig
and Cooper, 1988
), Raf (Thorburn et al., 1994
), Erk (Robbins
et al., 1993
; Westwick et al., 1994
), and CREB
kinase (Xing et al., 1996
).
The chromogranin A transcriptional response to nicotine was almost
completely inhibited by expression of dominant negative mutants (Fig.
2) of three of these MAPK pathway
components (Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase; Kyriakis and Avruch, 1996
;
Treisman et al. 1996
; Robinson et al., 1997
),
although not by a dominant negative Ras mutant. Likewise, the
chromogranin A transcriptional response to protein kinase C activation
(by PMA) was at least partially blocked by dominant negative mutants of
Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase, although not by the Ras mutant (Fig. 2).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effects of cotransfected MAPK pathway dominant
negative (inhibitory) mutants on the response of the chromogranin A
promoter to stimulation by nicotine, phorbol ester, or NGF in
pheochromocytoma cells. The 1133-bp mouse chromogranin A
promoter/luciferase reporter (3 µg/ml) was cotransfected along with
the indicated (left) trans-inhibitor
expression plasmid (3 µg/ml). Stimulations were nicotine, 1 mM, 48 hr; PMA (phorbol ester), 0.1 µM, 6 hr;
NGF (positive control), 0.1 µg/ml, 48 hr; or vehicle (mock). Results
shown are luciferase activity/mg protein [four replicates/condition,
mean ± standard error; a, p < 0.05, compared
with the control (pBluescript) cotransfection group for each
stimulation (same color)]. b, p < 0.05, compared
with the unstimulated group for each cotransfection (same mutant
expressed). Control: cotransfection of pBluescript.
DN-Ha-Ras, dominant negative c-Ha-Ras (S17N) expression
driven by the SV40 promoter, in the plasmid pCD-DNras;
DN-Raf-1, dominant negative rat Raf-1 (K375R) expression
driven by the RSV LTR (Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat)
promoter, in the plasmid KS RSPA cRAF DN; DN-Erk1,
dominant negative human Erk1 (K71R) expression driven by the CMV
(cytomegalovirus) promoter, in the plasmid pCMV5 Erk1 K71R;
DN-Erk2, dominant negative human Erk2 mutant (K52R)
expression driven by the CMV promoter, in the plasmid pCMV5 Erk2 K52R;
DN-RSK2, dominant negative human RSK2 (ribosomal serine
kinase 2; CREB kinase) mutant (K100R) expression driven by the AML
(adenovirus major late promoter), in the plasmid pMT2HARSK2(KR100).
|
|
As a positive control, the effects of NGF on chromogranin A
transcription also were evaluated in the same experiment. NGF signaling
to chromogranin A transcription was substantially blocked by each of
the dominant negative mutants (for Ras, Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase).
Thus, the Ras dominant negative mutant was functional, and its lack of
inhibition of nicotine or PMA effects, suggests that Ras does not
signal for nicotine or PMA. Thus, specific mutant disruption of the
MAPK pathway inhibits the chromogranin A transcriptional response to
nicotine or PMA but only at the Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase steps
(although not at the level of Ras).
Nicotine or PMA effects on MAPK pathway enzymatic activity in PC12
cells.
In an MAPK activity assay (Fig.
3), nicotine augmented phosphorylation of
an MAPK substrate by 1.8-fold at 30 min, 4.6-fold at 1 hr, and 2.2-fold
at 12 hr. PMA increased activity by 3.2-fold at 30 min. Thus, MAPK
pathway enzymatic activity is triggered by nicotine or PMA in PC12
cells.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Stimulation of MAPK pathway enzymatic activity by
nicotine or protein kinase C activation in pheochromocytoma cells.
After stimulation of PC12 cells by secretatogue (nicotine,
10 3 M, or PMA, 10 6
M) or vehicle, MAPK was immunoprecipitated from cell
extracts and then incubated with [ -32P]ATP and the
MAPK substrate PHAS-I ("phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein
regulated by insulin"). Electrophoresis was performed in a
Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
gel. The dpm (disintegrations/minute) in the labeled bands were
lane 1, 7,220; lane 2, 13,200;
lane 3, 33,300; lane 4, 16,200, and
lane 5, 22,900.
|
|
MAPK pathway signaling to the chromogranin A promoter: Localization
of the activation to the CRE.
Because nicotinic cholinergic
stimulation of chromogranin A transcription maps substantially onto the
chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE, [
71 bp]5'-TGACGTAA-3'[
64
bp] (Tang et al., 1996
), we tested the effects of not only
nicotine but also several MAPK pathway activators on transfected
proximal chromogranin A promoter/reporter constructs: the MAPK
activator ATA (Okada et al., 1995
), the MAPK and MEK
activator PAF (C16) (Honda et al.,
1994
), or the MAPK activator N-hexanoyl
D-erythro-sphingosine
(C6-ceramide) (Jayadev et al., 1995
).
Not only nicotine and PMA but also each of the MAPK pathway activators
(ATA, PAF, or C6-ceramide),
trans-activated the transfected chromogranin A promoter in
PC12 cells (Table 2). Both a 100-bp promoter (in plasmid pXP-100) and a 77-bp promoter (in plasmid pXP-77)
were activated by each stimulus.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Necessity of the CRE box for MAPK pathway-mediated signaling to
chromogranin A gene expression in pheochromocytoma cells
Mouse chromogranin A promoter/reporter plasmids were transfected into
PC12 cells. Cells were harvested for reporter assay after the times
noted. Mutant bases in the CRE box are designated in bold type. In the
mouse chromogranin A promoter, the functional wild-type CRE box
(TGACGTAA) is at position 71 to 64 bp upstream of the cap
(transcription initiation) site. Data are shown as mean ± standard error values (n = 4) for luciferase/mg protein ratios.
|
|
The degree of nicotinic activation of the 100-bp (2.28-fold; pXP-100;
Table 2), 77-bp (1.91-fold; pXP-77; Table 2), or 1133-bp (2.66-fold;
pXP-1133; Table 1) transfected chromogranin A promoters was similar.
Likewise, the degree of PMA activation of the 100-bp (2.01-fold;
pXP-100; Table 2), and 77-bp (1.84-fold; pXP-77; Table 2) transfected
chromogranin A promoters was similar.
MAPK pathway activators stimulated the transfected 100-bp chromogranin
A promoter (pXP-100) to an extent (2.32-2.65-fold) similar to
nicotinic (2.28-fold) or PMA (2.01-fold) stimulation (Table 2).
Likewise, MAPK pathway activators stimulated the transfected 77-bp
chromogranin A promoter (pXP-77) to an extent (1.86-2.36-fold) similar
to nicotinic (1.91-fold) or PMA (1.84-fold) induction (Table 2).
Site-directed mutation of the chromogranin A promoter CRE (TGACGTAA;
Table 2), either a 6/8-bp change (to CATCACCA) in a 100-bp promoter
(mutant M13) or a single base gap (to TGA-GTAA) in a 77-bp promoter
(mutant M41), virtually abolished the chromogranin A promoter response
to not only nicotine or PMA but also the three MAPK pathway activators:
ATA, PAF, and C6-ceramide. Thus, the chromogranin
A promoter proximal CRE, [
71 bp]5'-TGACGTAA-3'[
64 bp], seemed
to be necessary (indeed, indispensable) in cis for activation of transcription in response to nicotinic stimulation, protein kinase C activation, or MAPK pathway activation.
Role of the chromogranin A CRE as a sufficient domain to transmit
MAPK pathway activation signals.
To test whether the mouse
chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE, [
71 bp]5'-TGACGTAA-3'[
64
bp], was sufficient to account for the response to MAPK pathway
activation, we fused the chromogranin A CRE (TGACGTAA) to a previously
unresponsive, heterologous (TK) promoter, which was in turn fused to a
luciferase reporter (pTK-LUC; Wu et al., 1994
, 1995
),
yielding the plasmid mCgA-CRE-TK. We also fused a mutant CRE
(TGA-GTAA) to the TK promoter, yielding the plasmid
Mutant-CRE-TK (Wu et al., 1995
); and a consensus CRE (TGACGTCA) to the TK promoter, yielding the plasmid Perfect-CRE-TK (Roesler et al., 1988
; Wu et al., 1995
).
The MAPK pathway activators ATA, PAF, and
C6-ceramide each stimulated the isolated CRE box
(Table 3), and the degree of stimulation (2.27-3.16-fold) was similar to that seen for the intact 1133-bp chromogranin A promoter (pXP-1133; 2.94-4.31-fold). By contrast, the
three MAPK pathway activators did not stimulate the control heterologous TK promoter without a CRE (in pTK-LUC), nor was this minimal promoter stimulated by nicotine or cAMP. The chromogranin A CRE
(in mCgA-CRE-TK) was stimulated to a similar degree by direct MAPK
activators (2.27-3.16-fold), nicotine (4.06-fold), or cAMP itself
(3.92-fold). A similar plasmid with a consensus CRE (TGACGTCA; Perfect-CRE-TK) also was stimulated to similar extents by MAPK activators (3.87-4.16-fold), nicotine (5.03-fold), or cAMP
(8.11-fold). Thus, the proximal CRE seems to be a sufficient element in
cis to account for activation of the chromogranin A promoter
by MAPK pathway stimulation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
Sufficiency of the CRE box for MAPK pathway-mediated signaling to
chromogranin A gene expression in pheochromocytoma cells
PC12 cells were transfected with the indicated promoter/luciferase
reporter plasmid (top row) and in the presence or absence of
secretagogues (left column), and cells were harvested for reporter
assay after the times noted. In the TK (thymidine kinase) plasmids, the
herpes simplex virus 110-bp TK promoter drives expression of a
luciferase reporter; isolated CRE (cAMP response element) boxes have
been fused just 5' (upstream) of the TK promoter. Both the mouse
chromogranin A (mCgA) promoter and the herpes simplex virus TK promoter
contain TATA boxes. Units are luciferase activity/mg protein. In the
wild-type mouse Cg A promoter, the functional CRE box (TGACGTAA) is
located at position 71 to 64 bp upstream of the cap site.
|
|
A "calcium response element," similar in sequence (TGACGTTT) to
a CRE (TGACGT[C/A]A), also can be activated by nicotinic cholinergic
stimulation, through an MAPK-dependent pathway.
Greenberg et
al. (Ginty et al., 1994
) characterized a "calcium
response element" in the c-Fos promoter that responds to cytosolic calcium-dependent signals. A c-Fos promoter/reporter plasmid (
71 wt
fos CAT) containing the calcium response element also was
activated (p < 0.05) by either nicotine
(1.8-fold) or PMA (1.4-fold), and each of these activations was almost
entirely blocked (p < 0.05) by inhibition of
the MAPK pathway, either at MAPK (by apigenin, 12.5 µM)
or at MEK (by PD98059, 40 µM). Thus, the calcium response element (TGACGTTT) responds to nicotine and PMA stimulation in much the
same MAPK pathway-dependent fashion as the chromogranin A CRE
(TGACGTAA).
Role of the transcription factor CREB in relaying signals from the
MAPK pathway: studies with chemical activators of MAPK.
Goodman
et al. (Walton et al., 1992
) developed a CREB
point mutant in the CREB DNA-binding domain, the expression of which acts as in dominant negative (inhibitory) fashion, perhaps by heterodimerizing with and thereby inactivating wild-type CREB. When we
coexpressed KCREB along with the 1133-bp mouse chromogranin A a
promoter/reporter plasmid in PC12 cells (Fig.
4), the chromogranin A promoter response
to nicotine was diminished by 73% (p < 0.05), whereas the response to three MAPK pathway chemical activators (ATA,
PAF, or C6-ceramide) was virtually abolished. As
a positive control, the effects of cAMP on chromogranin A transcription
also were blocked by KCREB expression (Fig. 4). Thus, CREB seemed to be
a necessary downstream element in signaling by MAPK pathway chemical
activation.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of the CREB antagonist KCREB on response of
the chromogranin A promoter to stimulation by nicotine or MAPK pathway
activators in pheochromocytoma cells. The 1133-bp mouse chromogranin A
promoter/luciferase reporter plasmid (3 µg) was cotransfected into
PC12 cells, along with either pRSV-KCREB (4 µg), or a DNA mass
control (pBluescript, 4 µg), in a 1-ml transfection volume. Exposure
(treatment) times were nicotine or cAMP, 48 hr; ATA, PAF
(C16), or C6-ceramide, 6 hr. Data shown are
luciferase activity/mg cell protein (mean ± standard error, four
replicates/condition). *, p < 0.05, comparing
KCREB with its control (pBluescript). ATA, stimulator of MAPK
phosphorylation; PAF (C16), activator of MAPK and MEK;
C6-ceramide, activator of MAPK. cAMP,
dibutyryl cAMP.
|
|
Role of the transcription factor CREB in relaying signals from the
MAPK pathway: studies with transfected overexpression of MAPK pathway
components.
Overexpression by cotransfection of Ras, Raf, Erk, or
CREB kinase each activated the transfected chromogranin A promoter in PC12 cells, by 1.8- to 3.8-fold (Fig. 5).
Coexpression of the CREB antagonist KCREB blunted the effects of not
only nicotine (Fig. 4) but also Ras, Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase (Fig. 5);
blockade of Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase effects was virtually complete.
Thus, CREB seemed to be a necessary downstream element in signaling by
each of these MAPK pathway components (Ras, Raf, Erk, and CREB kinase).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Role of CREB in relaying MAPK pathway activation
signals to the chromogranin A promoter in pheochromocytoma cells. A
1133-bp mouse chromogranin A promoter/luciferase reporter was
cotransfected into PC12 cells with the indicated MAPK pathway activator
plasmid (left), in the presence or absence of an
expression plasmid for the CREB antagonist KCREB. After 48 hr, the
cells were harvested for reporter assay. Transfection amounts (in 1 ml
each) were 3 µg of chromogranin A promoter/luciferase reporter, 4 µg of pRSV-KCREB, and 2 µg of MAPK pathway expression plasmid.
pBluescript was cotransfected as a DNA mass control, in the absence of
activator or inhibitor plasmid or plasmids. Data shown are luciferase
activity/mg protein (mean ± standard error, four
replicates/condition). *, p < 0.05, comparing
KCREB with its control (pBluescript). KCREB, dominant
negative CREB antagonist; RSV, Rous sarcoma virus long
terminal repeat.); cHa-Ras, wild-type c-Ha-Ras
expression driven by the SV40 promoter, in the plaasmid pCD-WTras;
rRaf-1, wild-type rat Raf-1 expression driven by the RSV
LTR (Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat) promoter, in the plasmid
KSRSPA cRAF; hErk1, wild-type human Erk1 expression
driven by the CMV (cytomegalovirus) promoter, in the plasmid pCMV5Erk1;
rErk2, wild-type rat Erk2 expression driven by the CMV
promoter, in the plasmid pCMV5Erk2; hRSK2, wild-type
human RSK2 (ribosomal serine kinase 2; CREB kinase) expression driven
by the AML (adenovirus major late promoter) in the plasmid
pMT2HARASK2.
|
|
Response of the endogenous (chromosomal) chromogranin A gene in
PC12 cells to the MAPK pathway.
The studies reported above relied
on activation of a transfected chromogranin A promoter. Do the same
observations apply to the chromogranin A gene as it exists in its usual
chromosomal location? For this question, we turned to mRNA blots,
evaluating the steady state levels of the chromogranin A message (Fig.
6). The chromogranin A mRNA was augmented
2.78-fold by nicotine, and this induction was entirely blocked by
either the MAPK inhibitor apigenin or the MEK inhibitor PD98059.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Chromogranin A mRNA response to nicotine in
pheochromocytoma cells showing the effect of activators or inhibitors
of the MAPK pathway. Northern blot quantification of MAPK pathway
inhibitor or activator effects on the chromogranin A mRNA (endogenous
gene) response to nicotine (10 3 M, 16 hr).
Two lanes (representing two separate culture plates of
PC12 cells) are shown at certain time points. The cyclophilin probe
recognizes a constitutive or "housekeeping" mRNA, at the same time
points. 18S rRNA, position of the 18S form of ribosomal
RNA on the ethidium bromide-stained gel. PD98059 (MEK inhibitor, 20 µM) or apigenin (MAPK inhibitor, 12.5 µM)
was added at the same time as nicotine. ATA (MAPK activator, 100 µM) or PAF (C16) (MAPK activator, 100 nM) was added 6 hr before cells were harvested.
Lanes 1 and 2, control. Lanes 3 and 4,
nicotine alone. Lane 5, PD98059 alone. Lane
6, apigenin alone. Lane 7, PD98059 plus
nicotine. Lane 8, apigenin plus nicotine. Lane
9, ATA alone. Lane 10, PAF alone.
Lane 11, ATA plus nicotine. Lane 12, PAF
plus nicotine.
|
|
Two MAPK activators each increased the chromogranin A mRNA: 2.51-fold
for ATA, and 3.02-fold for PAF. When coadministered, nicotine plus the
MAPK activators had slightly less than additive effects: 4.64-fold for
nicotine plus ATA and 3.88-fold for nicotine plus PAF. Thus, the
endogenous chromogranin A gene responds to MAPK pathway activation in a
manner similar in direction (Table 1) and magnitude (Tables 2 and 3;
Fig. 4) to the responses of the transfected chromogranin A promoter.
Conclusions.
Our results can be summarized and interpreted
most parsimoniously by the following model (see Fig.
7). Nicotinic cholinergic stimulation
triggers an initial cytosolic influx of sodium (Tang et al.,
1997
), creating membrane depolarization that then admits calcium to the
cytosol through voltage-gated calcium channels (Tang et al.,
1996
, 1997
). Calcium activates protein kinase C, thereby triggering the
MAPK cascade, initially by Serine/Threonine phosphorylating and thereby
activating Raf (Kyriakis and Avruch, 1996
; Treisman et al.,
1996
; Robinson et al., 1997
), which in turn causes the
sequential phosphorylation and activation of MEK, MAPK, CREB kinase,
and CREB. CREB, activated by phosphorylation on Ser133 (Tang et
al., 1996
), finally relays the transcriptional signal to the CRE
([
71 bp]5'-TGACGTAA-3'[
64 bp]) of the chromogranin A proximal
promoter.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Outline of proposed signal transduction pathway for
activation of chromogranin A transcription by nicotinic cholinergic
stimulation in pheochromocytoma cells. CgA, chromogranin
A; P-CREB, Ser133-phosphorylated (activated) CREB;
PKC, protein kinase C; MAPKK, MEK;
MAPKKK, MEK kinase. Dashed lines with
brackets, inhibition (or an inhibitor). Broad
arrows, signaling pathways suggested or confirmed by the
current experiments. Thin arrow, a pathway (Ras Raf-1) excluded by the current experiments from participation in
nicotinic cholinergic signaling.
|
|
Although the protooncogene Ras activated chromogranin A transcription
(Figs. 1 and 5) and a dominant negative Ras mutant (S17N) blocked
chromogranin A promoter activation by NGF (Fig. 2), the dominant
negative Ras mutant did not affect nicotinic signaling to chromogranin
A (Fig. 2). Thus, although Ras is a potent early activator of the MAPK
pathway (Figs. 1 and 5), nicotinic or protein kinase C signaling into
the MAPK pathway seems to proceed through Raf-1 without involving Ras
(Fig. 7).
Nicotinic cholinergic stimulation stimulates the enzymatic activity of
the MAPK pathway (Fig. 3), and disruption of the MAPK pathway, by
either chemical inhibition (Table 1) or dominant negative mutants of
pathway components (Fig. 2), abolishes nicotinic signaling toward
secretory protein transcription. Thus, the MAPK pathway is necessary in
trans for nicotinic signaling to the chromogranin A
promoter. The CRE (TGACGTAA) seems to be both necessary (Table 2) and
sufficient (Table 3) in cis for transmission of signals initiated by either nicotine or the MAPK pathway.
MAPK pathway chemical activation triggered increases in chromogranin A
promoter activity similar in direction and magnitude to that obtained
after nicotine (Tables 2 and 3); similarly, MAPK pathway chemical
inhibition diminished the chromogranin A promoter response to nicotine
(Table 1). While we measured MAPK pathway enzymatic activity
(phosphorylation of the MAPK substrate PHAS-I) under only a few
circumstances (nicotine or phorbol ester; Fig. 3), inhibition of the
nicotine response by both chemical (Table 1) and genetic (Fig. 2)
blockade of the MAPK pathway argues for a crucial role of this pathway
in mediating the nicotinic response of chromogranin A. Although MAPK
pathway activation seems to be crucial for transcriptional responses to
nicotinic cholinergic stimulation (Tables 1, Fig. 2), this pathway
apparently does not impinge on catecholamine secretion (Table 1)
triggered by the same nicotinic stimulus.
Xing et al. (1996)
first identified Rsk2 as CREB kinase, and
they pointed out its central role in MAPK cascade signaling to c-Fos
gene expression at the CRE in cis. Our studies extend the spectrum of CREB/cAMP targets for the MAPK pathway to secretory proteins (such as chromogranin A) and extend the range of MAPK pathway
activators to the nicotinic cholinergic system (Tang et al.,
1996
, 1997
), the physiological mediator of neurotransmission in
autonomic ganglia (both sympathetic and parasympathetic), chromaffin cells, and a diverse population of central neurons (Wonnacott, 1997
).
The CREB antagonist KCREB virtually abolished the response of the
chromogranin A promoter to chemical activation of the MAPK pathway or
to cAMP (Fig. 4), but the response to nicotine was incompletely (only
73%) disrupted by KCREB. Because both nicotinic and MAPK pathway
activation of chromogranin A map onto the promoter CRE (Tables 2 and
3), perhaps a trans-activating factor other than CREB may
signal in a quantitatively minor fashion to the promoter CRE,
accounting for a portion of the nicotinic response. For example, other
members of the CREB/activating transcription factor family may bind to
CRE elements, as may members of the AP-1/Jun-Fos/Fra family (Habener,
1990
).
Xia et al. (1996)
described MAPK cascade activation by
cytosolic calcium influx after
glutamate/N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation in primary neurons. Because
glutamate/N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and
nicotinic cholinergic receptors are both members of the same
superfamily of extracellular ligand-gated heteropentameric cation
channels, our results perhaps are analogous, although involving different receptor family members (Conley, 1996
).
Rosen and Greenberg (1996)
also found MAPK stimulation after
voltage-sensitive calcium channel activation. Although our dominant negative mutant results seemed to exclude a role for Ras (Fig. 2), and
our inhibitor results (Tang et al., 1997
) instead suggest a
necessary role for protein kinase C, Rosen and Greenberg (1996)
and
Rosen et al. (1994)
found that some calcium-influx signals to the MAPK cascade were quite Ras dependent. Different results in
particular signaling pathways may reflect the very different targets we
studied. For example, Rosen and Greenberg (1996)
and Rosen et
al. (1994)
found that the Ras-dependent pathway also was activated
by release of calcium from intracellular stores, while we found that
only extracellular calcium influx could trigger transcription of
chromogranin A (Tang et al., 1996
, 1997
).
In conclusion, our results suggest that the MAPK pathway plays a
crucial role in nicotinic cholinergic signaling in chromaffin cells to
secretory protein transcription, although not to catecholamine secretion. In trans, our results suggest this signal
transduction cascade: protein kinase C
Raf
MEK
MAPK
CREB kinase
CREB. In cis, the chromogranin A promoter
CRE is both necessary and sufficient to confer both nicotinic and MAPK
responses.
 |
Acknowledgments |
Gifts of expression plasmids included activator/inhibitor Ras
(N. M. Nathanson, University of Washington, Seattle, WA),
activator/inhibitor Raf (M. Karin, University of California, San Diego,
CA), activator/inhibitor Erk1 and Erk2 (J. K. Westwick, University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC), activator/inhibitor CREB kinase
and 71-bp c-fos/CAT promoter/reporter (M. E. Greenberg,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and KCREB (R. H. Goodman,
Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR).
 |
Footnotes |
Received December 23, 1997; Accepted March 18, 1998
This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs,
the National Institutes of Health, and the National Kidney Foundation.
Send reprint requests to: Daniel T. O'Connor, MD,
Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics (9111H),
University of California, San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San
Diego, CA 92161. E-mail: doconnor{at}ucsd.edu
 |
Abbreviations |
CRE, cAMP response element;
CREB, cAMP
response element binding protein;
RskII, ribosomal protein S6 serine
kinase II (pp90rsk, CREB kinase);
Erk, extracellular signal
relay serine/threonine kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
bp, base pair(s);
MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase;
Raf1, serine/threonine kinase;
MEKK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase;
Ras, guanine
nucleotide-binding/exchanging protooncogene product;
NGF, nerve growth
factor;
PMA, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate;
PAF, platelet-activating
factor;
TK, thymidine kinase;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
 |
References |
-
Alessi DR,
Cuenda A,
Cohen P,
Dudley DT and
Saltiel AR
(1995)
PD 098059 is a specific inhibitor of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro and in vivo.
J Biol Chem
270:
27489-27494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Boulton TG,
Nye SH,
Robbins DJ,
Ip INJ,
Radziejewska E,
Morgenbesser SR,
DePinho RA,
Panayotatos N,
Cobb MH and
Yancopoulos GD
(1991)
ERKs: a family of protein-serine/threonine kinases that are activated and tyrosine phosphorylated in response to insulin and NGF.
Cell
65:
663-675[Medline].
-
Bradford MM
(1976)
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal Biochem
7:
248-254.
-
Brammar WJ
(1996)
Nicotinic acetylcholine-gated integral receptor-channels, in
The Ion Channel FactsBook: Extracellular Ligand-Gated Channels (Conley EC ed) pp 234-292,
Academic Press, London.
-
Davis RJ
(1993)
The mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway.
J Biol Chem
268:
14553-14556[Free Full Text].
-
Dewet JR,
Wood KV,
DeLuca M,
Helinski D and
Subramani S
(1986)
Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells.
Mol Cell Biol
6:
1663-1670[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Feig LA,
Pan BT,
Roberts TM and
Cooper GM
(1986)
Isolation of ras GTP-binding mutants using an in situ colony-binding assay.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
83:
4607-4611[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Feig LA and
Cooper GM
(1988)
Inhibition of NIH 3T3 cell proliferation by a mutant ras protein with preferential affinity for GDP.
Mol Cell Biol
8:
3235-3243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ginty D,
Bonni A and
Greenberg ME
(1994)
Nerve growth factor activates a Ras- dependent protein kinase that stimulates c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of CREB.
Cell
77:
713-725[Medline].
-
Greene LA and
Tischler AS
(1976)
Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
73:
2424-8[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Habener JF
(1990)
Cyclic AMP response element binding proteins: a cornucopia of transcription factors.
Mol Endocrinol
4:
1087-1094[Medline].
-
Jayadev S,
Liu B,
Bielawska AE,
Lee JY,
Nazaire F,
Pushkareva MY,
Obeid LM and
Hammun YA
(1995)
Role for ceramide in cell cycle arrest.
J Biol Chem
270:
2047-2052[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gorman CM,
Moffat LF and
Howard BH
(1982)
Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells.
Mol Cell Biol
2:
1044-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Honda Z,
Takano T,
Gotoh Y,
Nishida E,
Ito K and
Shimizu T
(1994)
Transfected platelet-activation factor receptor activates mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and MAP kinase kinase in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
J Biol Chem
269:
2307-2315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Johnson JA and
Nathanson NM
(1994)
Differential requirements of p21 ras and protein kinase C in the regulation of neuronal gene expression by nerve growth factor and neurokinase.
J Biol Chem
269:
18856-18863[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kuo ML and
Yang NC
(1995)
Reversion of v-H-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells by apigenin through inhibiting mitogen activated protein kinase and its downstream oncogenes.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
212:
767-775[Medline].
-
Kyriakis JM and
Avruch J
(1996)
Sounding the alarm: protein kinase cascades activated by stress and inflammation.
J Biol Chem
271:
24313-24316[Free Full Text].
-
Marquardt B,
Frith D and
Stabel S
(1994)
Signalling from TPA to MAP kinase requires protein kinase C, raf and MEK: reconstitution of the signalling pathway in vitro.
Oncogene
9:
3213-3218[Medline].
-
Okada N and
Koizumi S
(1995)
A neuroprotective compound, aurin tricarboxylic acid, stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation cascade in PC12 cells.
J Biol Chem
270:
16464-16469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pang L,
Sawada T,
Decker SJ and
Saltiel AR
(1995)
Inhibition of MAP kinase kinase blocks the differentiation of PC12 cells induced by nerve growth factor.
J Biol Chem
270:
13585-13588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Parmer RJ,
Xi X-P,
Wu H,
Helman LJ and
Petz LN
(1993)
Secretory protein traffic: chromogranin A contains a dominant targeting signal for the regulated pathway.
J Clin Invest
92:
1042-1054.
-
Robbins DJ,
Zhen E,
Owaki H,
Vanderbilt CA,
Ebert D,
Geppert TD and
Cobb MH
(1993)
Regulation and properties of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 in vitro.
J Biol Chem
268:
5097-5106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Robinson MJ and
Cobb MH
(1997)
Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
9:
180-186[Medline].
-
Roesler WJ,
Vandenbark GR and
Hanson RW
(1988)
Cyclic AMP and the induction of eukaryotic gene transcription.
J Biol Chem
263:
9063-9070[Free Full Text].
-
Rosen LB,
Ginty DD,
Weber MJ and
Greenberg ME
(1994)
Membrane depolarization and calcium influx stimulate MEK and MAP kinase via activation of Ras.
Neuron
12:
1207-1221[Medline].
-
Rosen LB and
Greenberg ME
(1996)
Stimulation of growth factor receptor signal transduction by activation of voltage-sensitive calcium channels.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
1113-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sato F,
Matsukawa Y,
Nishino K and
Sakai T
(1994)
Apigenin induces morphological differentiation and G2-M arrest in rat neuronal cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
204:
578-584[Medline].
-
Sheng M,
Dougan ST,
McFadden G and
Greenberg ME
(1988)
Calcium and growth factor pathways of c-fos transcriptional activation require distinct upstream regulatory sequences.
Mol Cell Biol
8:
2787-2796[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Takiyyuddin MA,
Cervenka JH,
Hsiao RJ,
Barbosa JA,
Parmer RJ and
O'Connor DT
(1990)
Chromogranin A: storage and release in hypertension.
Hypertension
15:
237-246[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tang K,
Wu H,
Mahata SK,
Taupenot L,
Rozansky DJ,
Parmer RJ and
O'Connor DT
(1996)
Stimulus-transcription coupling in pheochromocytoma cells: promoter region-specific activation of chromogranin A biosynthesis.
J Biol Chem
271:
28382-28390[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tang K,
Wu H,
Mahata SK,
Mahata M,
Gill BM,
Parmer RJ and
O'Connor DT
(1997)
Stimulus coupling to transcription versus secretion in pheochromocytoma cells: convergent and divergent signal transduction pathways, and the crucial roles for route of cytosolic calcium entry and protein kinase C.
J Clin Invest
100:
1180-1192[Medline].
-
Thorburn J,
McMahon M and
Thorburn A
(1994)
Raf-1 kinase activity is necessary and sufficient for gene expression changes but not sufficient for cellular morphology changes associated with cardiac myocyte hypertrophy.
J Biol Chem
269:
30580-30586[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Treisman R
(1996)
Regulation of transcription by MAP kinase cascades.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
8:
205-215[Medline].
-
Walton KM,
Rehfuss RP,
Chrivia JC,
Lochner JE and
Goodman RH
(1992)
A dominant repressor of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-regulated enhancer-binding protein activity inhibits the cAMP-mediated induction of the somatostatin promoter in vivo.
Mol Endocrinol
6:
647-655[Abstract].
-
Westwick JK,
Cox AD,
Der CJ,
Cobb MH,
Hibi M,
Karin M and
Brenner DA
(1994)
Oncogenic Ras activates c-jun via a separate pathway from the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
6030-6034[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wonnacott S
(1997)
Presynaptic nicotinic ACh receptors.
Trends Neurosci
20:
92-98[Medline].
-
Wu H,
Rozansky DJ,
Webster NJG and
O'Connor DT
(1994)
Cell type-specific gene expression in neuroendocrine system: a neuroendocrine-specific regulatory element in the promoter of chromogranin A, a ubiquitous secretory granule core protein.
J Clin Invest
94:
118-129.
-
Wu H,
Mahata SK,
Mahata M,
Webster NJG,
Parmer RJ and
O'Connor DT
(1995)
A functional cyclic AMP response plays a crucial role in neuroendocrine cell type-specific expression of the secretory granule protein chromogranin A.
J Clin Invest
96:
568-578.
-
Xia Z,
Dudek H,
Miranti CK and
Greenberg ME
(1996)
Calcium influx via the NMDA receptor induces immediate-early gene transcription by a MAP kinase ERK-dependent mechanism.
J Neurosci
16:
5425-5436[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Xing J,
Ginty DD and
Greenberg ME
(1996)
Coupling of the RAS-MAPK pathway to gene activation by RSK2, a growth factor-regulated CREB kinase.
Science (Washington DC)
273:
959-963[Abstract].
0026-895X/98/010059-11$3.00/0
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 54:59-69 (1998).
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics