|
|
|
|
Vol. 54, Issue 2, 322-333, August 1998
3/
4 Subtype of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine
Receptor Stably Expressed in a Transfected Cell Line: Pharmacology of
Ligand Binding and Function
Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We stably transfected human kidney embryonic 293 cells with the
rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR)
3 and
4
subunit genes. This new cell line, KX
3
4R2, expresses a high level
of the
3/
4 receptor subtype, which binds (±)-
[3H]epibatidine with a
Kd value of 304±16
pM and a Bmax value of
8942 ± 115 fmol/mg protein. Comparison of nicotinic drugs in
competing for
3/
4 receptor binding sites in this cell line and
the binding sites in rat forebrain (predominantly
4/
2 receptors) revealed marked differences in their
Ki values, but similar rank
orders of potency for agonists were observed, with the exception of
anatoxin-A. The affinity of the competitive antagonist
dihydro-
-erythroidine is >7000 times higher at
4/
2 receptors
in rat forebrain than at the
3/
4 receptors in these cells. The
3/
4 nAChRs expressed in this cell line are functional, and in
response to nicotinic agonists, 86Rb+ efflux
was increased to levels 8-10 times the basal levels. Acetylcholine, (
)-nicotine, cytisine, carbachol, and (±)-epibatidine all stimulated 86Rb+ efflux, which was blocked by
mecamylamine. The EC50 values for acetylcholine and
(
)-nicotine to stimulate 86Rb+ effluxes were
114 ± 24 and 28 ± 4 µM, respectively.
The rank order of potency of nicotinic antagonists in blocking the
function of this
3/
4 receptor was mecamylamine > d-tubocurarine > dihydro-
-erythroidine > hexamethonium. Mecamylamine, d-tubocurarine, and
hexamethonium blocked the function by a noncompetitive mechanism,
whereas dihydro-
-erythroidine blocked the function competitively.
The KX
3
4R2 cell line should prove to be a very useful model for
studying this subtype of nAChRs.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuronal
nAChRs are ligand-gated cation channels composed of
and
subunits. Eight different
subunits (
2-
9) and three different
subunits (
2-
4) have been identified in vertebrate neuronal
tissue, which allows for the possibility of multiple nAChR subtypes
that display a range of functional and pharmacological characteristics.
In rat brain, the two most abundant nAChR subtypes (as measured by the
density of binding sites) are one composed of
4 and
2 subunits
(Whiting et al., 1991
; Flores et al., 1992
) and
another that may be composed of
7 subunits only (Schoepfer et
al., 1990
; Seguela et al., 1993
). The relative
abundance of the mRNA encoding nAChR subunits in brain is consistent
with the prevalence of these two receptor subtypes (Wada et
al., 1989
; Seguela, et al., 1993
). However, the CNS
expresses mRNA for all of the nAChR subunits, and despite their lower
abundance in brain overall, the receptors that contain
3 subunits
may mediate important effects of acetylcholine and nicotine in specific
regions of the brain (Mulle et al., 1991
; Connolly et
al., 1995
; Clarke and Reuben, 1996
; Albuquerque et al.,
1997
; Kulak et al., 1997
), in the retina (McKay et
al., 1994
), and in the spinal cord (Flores et al.,
1997
).
In addition to their roles in the CNS, nAChRs comprised of
3
subunits in combination with either
2 or
4 subunits may play fundamental roles in peripheral neuronal tissues, including neurons of
mammalian sympathetic ganglia (Covernton et al., 1994
;
Mandelzys et al., 1994
), parasympathetic ganglia (Poth
et al., 1997
), sensory neurons such as the trigeminal
ganglia (Flores et al., 1996
), and adrenal chromaffin cells
(Rogers et al., 1992
; Campos-Caro, 1997
). Nicotinic
receptors containing
3 subunits also may predominate in chick
ciliary ganglia (Boyd et al., 1988
; Couturier et
al., 1990
), superior cervical ganglia (Couturier et
al., 1990
; Vernallis et al., 1993
; Conroy and Berg,
1995
), and dorsal root ganglion cells (Boyd et al., 1991
).
Compared with the
4/
2 nAChR in the CNS, receptors that contain
3 subunits seem to have much lower affinity for most nicotinic agonists; therefore, until recently, they could not be reliably measured or studied with the available radiolabeled ligands. This fundamental obstacle has hindered studies of the pharmacology and
regulation of the binding sites of these receptor subtypes. EB, in
contrast to most other nicotinic agonists, has high affinity for
ganglionic-type receptors (Badio and Daly, 1994
); in fact, [3H]EB binds with high affinity to several
different defined nAChR subtypes in stably transfected cell lines (Xiao
et al., 1996
), as well as to the receptor or receptors in
rat adrenal gland (Houghtling et al., 1995
) and trigeminal
ganglia (Flores et al., 1996
). Furthermore, the iodinated
analog of EB, [125I]EB (formerly
[125I]IPH), labels receptors in the superior
cervical ganglia (Dávila-García et al., 1997
).
These ganglionic tissues seem to contain nicotinic receptors composed
predominantly of
3 subunits in combination with either
2 or
4
subunits, and in some cases, there may be an additional
5 subunit
(Conroy et al., 1992
; Conroy and Berg, 1995
).
Another critical obstacle to the characterization of the pharmacology
and regulation of nAChR subtypes containing
3 subunits is that the
tissues in which they are found in high concentration, such as
autonomic ganglia, adrenal gland, and specific nuclei within the brain,
may contain more than one subtype of nicotinic receptor, making the
assignment of characteristics to any one subtype difficult.
Furthermore, these tissues provide only a very limited amount of tissue
for study because of their relatively small size.
To study the pharmacological and functional characteristics of an
important nAChR subtype that contains
3 subunits, we transfected HEK
293 cells with the genes encoding rat
3 and
4 nicotinic receptor
subunits. A stable clonal cell line has been established, and it
expresses this nAChR subtype at a very high density. Here, we report
the characteristics of the
3/
4 nAChR binding site labeled by
[3H]EB and the activation of this receptor
ligand-gated ion channel by nicotinic agonists.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials and drugs.
Tissue culture medium, serum,
antibiotics, restriction endonucleases, modifying enzymes, and
molecular size standards were obtained from GIBCO BRL (Gaithersburg,
MD). [3H]EB and
86RbCl were supplied by New England
Nuclear Research Products (Boston, MA).
[
-35S]dATPs,
[
-32P]CTP, and
[
-32P]ATP were obtained from Amersham
(Arlington Heights, IL). DNA sequencing reagents were purchased from
United States Biochemicals (Cleveland, OH). Electrophoresis reagents
were purchased from BioRad Laboratories (Melville, NY). All other
chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) unless
otherwise stated. A-85380, (+)-anatoxin-A, DH
E, and EB were from
Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). (
)-Nicotine,
acetylcholine, carbachol, d-tubocurarine, and
cytisine were from Sigma Chemical. Mecamylamine was from Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Lab (Rahway, NJ). Two plasmids, pPCA48E-3 and
pZPC13, which carry the cDNA clones of rat neuronal nAChR subunit
3
and
4 genes, were described previously (Boulter et al.,
1987
; Duvoisin et al., 1989
) and were generously provided by
Dr. J. Boulter (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA). HEK 293 cells (CRL 1573; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were a gift
from Y.-H. Wang and B.B. Wolfe (Georgetown University, Washington,
D.C.).
Construction of pKX
3RC1 and pKX
4RC1.
To constitutively
express the rat neuronal nAChR
3 subunit in mammalian cells, a
1.7-kb HindIII/EcoRI fragment was isolated from
the pPCA48E-3 and subcloned into the eukaryotic expression vector
pcDNA3 (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA). The resulting plasmid with the
3
coding sequence in the sense orientation was designated pKX
3RC1. For
generation of the eukaryotic expressable
4 gene, a 2-kb
EcoRI/XbaI fragment was isolated from the pZPC13
and inserted into the pcDNA3 vector. The new construct with the
4
coding sequence in the sense orientation was denoted pKX
4RC1.
pKX
3RC1 and pKX
4RC1 were restriction mapped and sequenced to
confirm correct ligation and orientation.
Cell culture and stable transfection.
HEK 293 cells were
maintained at 37° with 5% CO2 in a humidified
incubator. Growth medium for the HEK 293 cells was minimum essential
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml
penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. For transfection experiments, plasmids were linearized by restriction digestion within
their prokaryotic elements. Transfection was conducted according to the
calcium phosphate method (Chen and Okayama, 1987
). Briefly,
exponentially growing HEK 293 cells were plated onto 100-mm dishes
containing 10 ml of the growth medium 24 hr before transfection. For a
single transfection experiment, 1 ml of transfection mixture was made.
The mixture was composed of 10 µg of linearized DNA, 125 mM CaCl2, 25 mM HEPES,
140 mM KCl, 6 mM glucose, and 0.75 mM Na2HPO4, pH
7.05. The mixture was added to the dish of cells in dropwise fashion.
The cells were incubated with the transfection mixture for 16 hr in the
incubator, after which the mixture was removed, and the cells were
grown in fresh growth medium for 24 hr. The cells then were collected
and plated at a range of densities onto six-well plates in the
selection medium, which consisted of the growth medium containing 0.7 mg/ml geneticin (G418). The cells were grown in the selection medium
for 3-4 weeks before G418-resistant clones were picked up by cloning
cylinders. The stably transfected cells were maintained in the
selection growth medium.
RNA isolation and RNase protection assay.
Total cellular RNA
was isolated from cells using RNA-STAT-60, an RNA isolation reagent
(Tel Test B, Friendswood, TX). DNA templates for antisense riboprobes
were prepared as described previously (Xiao et al., 1995
).
The size of the full-length probes and the expected protected fragments
of the probes are for rat
2, 421 and 332 bases; rat
3, 308 and
231 bases; rat
4, 497 and 408 bases; rat
5, 450 and 388 bases;
rat
2, 328 and 266 bases; rat
4, 258 and 174 bases; and human
GAPDH, 224 and 154 bases, respectively. The probes were synthesized
using T7 RNA polymerase (Ambion, Austin, TX) and
[
-32P]CTP. Specific activities of
[
-32P]CTP used for synthesizing the probes
of rat nAChR subunit genes and the probe of GAPDH were 800 and 32 Ci/mmol, respectively. Approximately 50 µg of total RNA was
hybridized with probes overnight at 42°. Nonprotected probes were
digested with a mixture of RNase A and RNase T1, and the samples were
processed using the RPA II kit (Ambion). The sizes of protected
fragments were determined by electrophoresis on a 6% denaturing
polyacrylamide gel.
Ligand binding studies.
Cultured cells at >70% confluence
were harvested in 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, and homogenized
with a Polytron homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY).
Homogenates were centrifuged at 35,000 × g for 10 min,
and pellets were washed twice with fresh buffer. Membrane pellets were
resuspended in fresh buffer, and aliquots equivalent to 60-200 µg of
protein were used for binding assays. Ligand binding was measured as
described previously (Houghtling et al., 1995
) with minor
modifications. Briefly, membrane preparations were incubated with
[3H]EB for 4 hr at 24° in a final volume of
2.5 ml. Bound and free ligands were separated by vacuum filtration
through Whatman GF/C filters treated with 0.5% polyethylenimine. The
filter-retained radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation
counting. Total binding and nonspecific binding was determined in the
absence and presence of (
)-nicotine (300 µM),
respectively. Specific binding was defined as the difference between
total binding and nonspecific binding. Typically, total binding was
measured in duplicate, and nonspecific binding was measured in singlet.
In saturation binding experiments, receptor densities
(Bmax) and dissociation constants
(Kd) were determined by nonlinear
least-squares regression analyses (Accufit Saturation Two-Site Program;
Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). The one-site model was accepted
unless the two-site model gave a statistically better fit of the data (p < 0.05 by F test). Hill coefficients
(nH) of specific binding curves were
determined by linear regression analyses of those specific binding
values that fell between 10% and 90% of
Bmax. The affinities of drugs at the
receptors were determined from binding inhibition curves, in which a
series of concentrations of each drug was incubated with a single
concentration of [3H]EB. In some studies, the
type of binding inhibition mechanism was investigated by including the
drug in a [3H]EB binding saturation assay. Hill
coefficients (nH) and
IC50 values of binding inhibition curves were
determined by linear regression analyses. The inhibition constants
(Ki) were calculated according to the
Cheng-Prusoff equation (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973
).
30% confluency. The medium was removed and replaced by 20 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, containing minimum essential
medium and 3 nM [3H]EB. The intact
cells were incubated with [3H]EB for 2 hr,
after which the buffer was removed by aspiration and the cells were
washed rapidly three times with buffer. The cells then were lysed by
the addition of 1 ml of 0.1 M NaOH, and the lysate in each
well was counted in a liquid scintillation counter. Nonspecific binding
was determined in parallel samples incubated with
[3H]EB in the presence of either 300 µM nicotine, which crosses cell membranes and thus has
access to both cell surface and intracellular receptors, or 30 mM carbachol, a quaternary ammonium nicotinic agonist that
does not easily cross membranes and thus has access only to cell
surface receptors. In this method, aggregate specific binding is
defined as total binding minus nonspecific binding measured in the
presence of nicotine, whereas cell surface specific binding is defined
as total binding minus nonspecific binding measured in the presence of
the nonpermeant carbachol.
86Rb+efflux assay.
The function of
nAChRs expressed in the transfected cells was measured using a
86Rb+ efflux assay as
described by Lukas and Cullen (1988)
, with modifications. In brief,
identical aliquots of cells in the selection growth medium were plated
onto 24-well plates coated with poly-d-lysine. The plated
cells were grown at 37° for 18-24 hr to reach 70-95% confluence.
The cells then were incubated in growth medium (0.5-1 ml/well)
containing 86RbCl (2 µCi/ml) for 4 hr at 37°.
The loading mixture was aspirated, and the cells were washed three
times with 1 ml aliquots of buffer (15 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgSO4, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 11 mM glucose, pH 7.4) for 30 sec, 5 min, and 30 sec, respectively. One milliliter of buffer, with or
without drugs, was added to each well. After incubation for 2 min, the
assay buffer was collected, and the amount of
86Rb+ in the buffer was
determined. Cells were lysed by the addition of 1 ml of 0.1 M NaOH to each well, and the lysate was collected for
determination of the amount of
86Rb+ that was in the cells
at the end of the efflux assay. Radioactivity of the assay samples and
lysates was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Total loading
(cpm) was calculated as the sum of the assay sample and the lysate of
each well. Values of total loading were 100,000-200,000 cpm/well. The
amount of 86Rb+ efflux was
expressed as a percentage of
86Rb+ loaded. Stimulated
86Rb+ efflux was defined as
the difference between efflux in presence and absence of nicotinic
agonists. The EC50, IC50,
and nH values were estimated by
linear regression analysis. Experiments with antagonists were done in
two different ways. For obtaining an IC50 value,
inhibition curves were constructed in which different concentrations of
an antagonist were included in the assay to inhibit efflux stimulated
by 100 µM nicotine. For determination of the
mechanism of antagonist blockade, concentration-response curves for
activation by nicotine were constructed in the absence or presence of
one or more concentrations of an antagonist.
Ca2+ and Na+ imaging assays. Effects of nicotinic drugs on changes in [Ca2+]i or [Na+]i were evaluated by Ca2+ and Na+ imaging assays. These assays were performed on an Attofluor Fluorescence Imaging System (Attofluor, Rockville, MD) with an Axiovert 135 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Germany). Cells were plated onto 25-mm glass coverslips (Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA) or 35-mm plastic tissue culture dishes (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark), both precoated with poly-d-lysine. The plated cells were grown for 36-72 hr at 37°. Culture medium was removed, and cells were rinsed three times with Locke's buffer with the following composition: 140 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM KCl, 3.6 mM NaHCO3, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5.6 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4.
For measuring [Ca2+]i, cells were loaded with 5-10 µM Fura-2/AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in Locke's buffer supplemented with 0.1% Pluronic F-127 (Molecular Probes) to facilitate dye loading. The cells were incubated with the loading solution for 30 min at room temperature and then washed three times with Locke's buffer. Dishes and coverslips were mounted onto the fluorescence microscope stage and then incubated with the Locke's buffer for 15-20 min to complete Fura-2/AM deesterification. Buffer with or without drugs was delivered at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Fluorescence was measured at room temperature at excitation wavelengths of 334 and 380 nm using dry objective 40/0.6 LD Achroplan for cells plated onto plastic dishes or oil immersion objective 40/1.3 Fluar Ph3 for cells seeded onto glass coverslips. Emission wavelengths, monitored with intensified CCD cameras, were >420 nm for objectives 40/0.6 LD Achroplan and >510 nm for objectives 40/1.3 Fluar Ph3. The [Ca2+]i was calculated from the ratio (R) of fluorescence signals obtained at the two excitation wavelengths as described by Grynkiewicz et al. (1985)| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stable transfections of HEK 293 cells.
Four sets of plasmid
DNA were used for transfection experiments independently: (1) pcDNA3
(vector only), (2) pKX
3RC1 (
3 subunit gene), (3) pKX
4RC1 (
4
subunit gene), and (4) the combination of pKX
3RC1 and pKX
4RC1
(
3 and
4 subunit genes). From each of the transfections, 36-72
stable, G418-resistant cell clones were isolated after cultivation in
selection medium for 3-4 weeks. These clonal cell lines were then
grown in selection medium for an additional 4 weeks.
3R1 (expressing the
3 subunit gene only), (3) KX
4R1
(expressing the
4 subunit gene only), and (4) KX
3
4R2
(expressing both the
3 and
4 subunit genes). An assessment of the
mRNA for six different rat nAChR subunits (
2-
5,
2, and
4)
in the parent HEK 293 cells and in each of the four clonal cell lines
is shown in Fig. 1. As expected, there
was no detectable expression of mRNA for any of the six nAChR subunit
genes in either HEK 293 or KXC1 cells. However, the mRNA levels for the
appropriate subunit gene in KX
3R1 and KX
4R1 were quite high, as
were the mRNA levels of both subunit genes in KX
3
4R2 (Fig. 1).
|
3 or
4 subunit gene (Fig.
2). In contrast, in membrane homogenates
from KX
3
4R2 cells, which had been transfected with both
3 and
4 genes, specific binding of [3H]EB was
quite high, displaying a density of binding sites >8000 fmol/mg of
protein (Fig. 2). As a point of comparison, the density of nicotinic
receptors labeled by [3H]EB in rat brain
membrane homogenates (primarily
4/
2 receptors) in parallel assays
was ~88 fmol/mg protein, or ~1% of the density of
3/
4
receptors in this cell line (Fig. 2, inset). The
KX
3
4R2 cell line was selected for further study and has been
continually cultured in our laboratory for >12 months with no
significant change in the levels of expression of the mRNA encoding
3 or
4 subunits or in the binding to or function of the receptor.
|
Analysis of [3H]EB binding to
3/
4 receptors in
KX
3
4R2 cell membrane homogenates.
Specific binding of
[3H]EB in cell membrane homogenates was
saturable and represented >98% of the total binding throughout most
of the concentration range used (Fig.
3A). The high density of nicotinic
receptor binding sites in KX
3
4R2 cells and the very low
nonspecific binding of [3H]EB allowed binding
to be analyzed over a wide range of concentrations. Over this range,
[3H]EB binding fit a model for a single site
with a Hill coefficient (nH) close to
1, a Kd value of ~300
pM, and a site density of ~8900 fmol/mg of
protein (Fig. 3B, see figure legend for calculated values).
|
Pharmacological characteristics of
3/
4 receptor binding sites
in KX
3
4R2 cells.
The pharmacological characteristics of the
3/
4 nicotinic receptor binding sites in these cells were examined
in binding competition assays in which drugs competed against
500
pM [3H]EB for binding sites in cell
membranes (Fig. 4A, Table
1). EB was by far the most potent drug in
competing for
3/
4 receptor binding sites, with an affinity
>2 orders of magnitude higher than that of any other drug tested. For
example, among nicotinic agonist drugs, EB was >100 times more potent
than anatoxin-A and A85380, >500 times more potent than cytisine, and
>1000 times more potent than nicotine, acetylcholine, or carbachol
(Fig. 4, Table 1). Among nicotinic antagonists,
d-tubocurarine was nearly 10 times more potent than DH
E
in competing for
3/
4 receptor binding sites (Fig. 4, Table 1).
Neither mecamylamine nor hexamethonium at concentrations up to 1 mM competed effectively for [3H]EB
binding sites.
|
|
4/
2 subtype of nicotinic receptor (Whiting
et al., 1991
4/
2 receptor
binding sites in rat forebrain than the
3/
4 receptors in
KX
3
4R2 cells. This can be seen in the leftward shift of the
curves in Fig. 4B compared with those in Fig. 4A. Furthermore, it
should be noted that the affinity of [3H]EB is
~7 times higher at the
4/
2 receptors in rat forebrain than at
the
3/
4 receptors in KX
3
4R2 cells; therefore, the fraction
of receptors occupied by [3H]EB in rat
forebrain was greater than that in the cells (90% versus 57%). Thus,
as shown in Table 1, after accounting for this difference in receptor
occupancy (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973
E and
A85380, which show, respectively, 7565 and 759 times higher affinity
for
4/
2 receptors than for
3/
4 receptors. Cytisine,
nicotine, and acetylcholine, all of which have been used as
radioligands to label nicotinic receptors in brain, also have much
higher affinity for
4/
2 receptors than for
3/
4 receptors
(Table 1).
Among agonists, the rank order of binding affinities at the two
receptor subtypes is similar, with only the relative position of
anatoxin-A changing. In contrast, the order of affinities of the two
antagonists, d-tubocurarine and DH
E, is very different at
the two receptor subtypes. Thus, at
3/
4 receptors
d-tubocurarine binds with almost 10 times higher affinity
than DH
E, whereas at
4/
2 receptors, DH
E has 77 times higher
affinity than d-tubocurarine (Table 1). Interestingly, the
Hill coefficients for d-tubocurarine competing at the
3/
4 receptor binding sites and for both antagonists competing at
the binding sites in brain are significantly <1 (Table 1).
Hexamethonium competed weakly for [3H]EB
binding sites in brain, whereas mecamylamine displayed virtually no
affinity.
Assessment of
3/
4 receptor function in KX
3
4R2
cells.
To examine the function of the
3/
4 nicotinic receptor
in these cells, we measured ion flux stimulated by nicotinic agonists. Three types of ion flux were measured: efflux of
86Rb+ from preloaded cells,
increases in intracellular Ca2+ as measured by
Fura-2/Ca2+ imaging, and increases in
intracellular Na+ as measured by
SBFI/Na+ imaging.
Stimulation of 86Rb+ efflux.
As shown
in Fig. 5A, nicotine stimulated
86Rb+ efflux from
KX
3
4R2 cells, which express both
3 and
4 subunits, but not
from the parent HEK 293 cells or from HEK 293 cells transfected with either the vector only or the
3 or
4 subunit only. Both nicotine and acetylcholine stimulated
86Rb+ efflux from
KX
3
4R2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5B), with
EC50 values of 28 and 114 µM,
respectively. Maximal 86Rb+
efflux, 8-10 times greater than the basal efflux, occurred at a
nicotine concentration of ~300 µM and an acetylcholine
concentration of 2 mM. Concentrations of >1 mM
nicotine and 10 mM acetylcholine tended
to decrease 86Rb+ efflux,
possibly due to desensitization or agonist blockade of the channel (see
Fig. 6B). The Hill coefficients for
functional activation of the receptor by nicotine and acetylcholine
were 1.6 and 1.5, respectively, and in both cases, these values were significantly different from 1 (p < 0.01). In
addition to nicotine and acetylcholine, cytisine (30 µM),
carbachol (300 µM), and EB (30 nM) all
stimulated 86Rb+ efflux
from KX
3
4R2 cells, and in each case, the efflux was nearly
completely blocked by 10 µM mecamylamine (Fig. 5C).
|
|
Block of nicotine-stimulated 86Rb+
efflux.
The blockade of nicotine-stimulated
86Rb+ efflux by several
antagonists was investigated. As shown in Fig. 5D, despite the
inability of mecamylamine to compete for the agonist binding site
(Table 1), it blocked nicotine-stimulated
86Rb+ efflux from
KX
3
4R2 cells quite potently, with an IC50
value of
1 µM and a nearly complete blockade of efflux
at a concentration of 10 µM. Similarly,
d-tubocurarine, DH
E, and hexamethonium blocked nicotine-stimulated ion efflux in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50 values of
10, 100, and 210 µM, respectively (Fig. 5D). In contrast to these drugs,
-bungarotoxin (1.5 µM) had no effect on
nicotine-stimulated 86Rb+
efflux from KX
3
4R2 cells (data not shown).
3/
4 receptor, it does not provide information about
the type of block exerted by these drugs. Therefore, to investigate the
mechanism of the block produced by these antagonists, concentration-response measurements for nicotine-stimulated
86Rb+ efflux were made in
the absence and presence of each of the drugs. As shown in Fig. 6A, in
the presence of mecamylamine or hexamethonium, the maximum response
elicited by nicotine was decreased, but the nicotine
EC50 value was not significantly altered,
indicating that both of these drugs block these nicotinic receptors by
a noncompetitive mechanism. In contrast, the presence of DH
E shifted the nicotine concentration-response curve to the right (Fig. 6B), resulting in a higher EC50 value but no decrease
in the maximum response that could be elicited, indicating that DH
E
blocks these receptors by a competitive mechanism.
Tubocurarine is a competitive antagonist at nicotinic receptors in
muscle, whereas at ganglionic nicotinic receptors, it has been reported
to block the ion channel of the receptor (Ascher et al.,
1979
3/
4 receptor function. As shown in
Fig. 6C, in the presence of increasing concentrations of
d-tubocurarine, the maximum
86Rb+ efflux stimulated by
nicotine was progressively decreased without noticeably affecting the
nicotine EC50 value. Furthermore, this blockade
by d-tubocurarine is reversible; therefore, when cells were
exposed to 200 µM d-tubocurarine for 2 min (as
in the 86Rb+ efflux assay)
and then washed in fresh buffer, the response to nicotine was nearly
completely restored (data not shown). Thus, d-tubocurarine
blocks
3/
4 receptor function by a noncompetitive mechanism
consistent with channel blockade.
Tubocurarine thus is unusual in that it competes with
[3H]EB for the
3/
4 receptor's agonist
binding site with an apparent Ki of
23 µM (Fig. 4, Table 1), but at similar
concentrations it blocks the receptor's function by a noncompetitive
mechanism, suggesting that it might be a channel blocker. Therefore, we
investigated the mechanism of the inhibition by
d-tubocurarine of [3H]EB binding to
3/
4 receptors in more detail by examining its effect on
[3H]EB binding saturation curves and comparing
it with the competitive antagonist DH
E. As shown in Fig.
7, the block of
[3H]EB binding by 250 µM DH
E fit a model of competitive
inhibition, shifting the apparent Kd
value of [3H]EB by a factor of 4 with no change
in its Bmax (Fig. 7B). The block of
[3H]EB binding by 30 µM
d-tubocurarine, however, seemed to fit a model of a mixed
mechanism. Competitive inhibition was indicated by the
3-fold shift
in apparent Kd for
[3H]EB, but there also was a 25% decrease in
the apparent Bmax value for
[3H]EB binding in the presence of
d-tubocurarine (Fig. 7B).
|
Ca2+ ion imaging.
As shown in Fig.
8A, nicotine stimulated an increase in
[Ca2+]i concentration in
KX
3
4R2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. When the
extracellular Ca2+ concentration was maintained
at 1.3 mM, nicotine at concentrations of 10 and 100 µM increased
[Ca2+]i levels to 2-fold
and 5-fold of base-line, respectively. When the extracellular
Ca2+ was raised from 1.3 to 10 mM
(Fig. 8B), the basal level of
[Ca2+]i increased
slightly, but the increase in
[Ca2+]i stimulated by 10 µM nicotine was markedly enhanced to >10-fold of
base-line. This nicotine stimulated increase in
[Ca2+]i was almost
completely blocked by 10 µM mecamylamine (Fig. 8B).
|
Na+ ion imaging. Nicotine also stimulated an increase in [Na+]i, measured by SBFI/Na+ imaging, and this increase was blocked by mecamylamine (Fig. 9A). Unlike changes in [Ca2+]i, however, the nicotine-stimulated increase in [Na+]i was not affected by increasing the extracellular Ca2+ from 1.3 to 10 mM (Fig. 9B).
|
Binding of [3H]EB to cell surface receptors.
The
KX
3
4R2 cells produce a very high density of
3/
4 receptors,
and the ligand binding studies indicate that these receptors have
characteristics of a single homogenous population. However, ligand
binding measurements in membrane homogenates do not distinguish between
receptors on the cell surface membrane and receptors on intracellular
membranes. Therefore, to estimate the fraction of the total
3/
4
receptor population that is located on the cell surface of KX
3
4R2
cells, [3H]EB binding was measured in intact
cells attached to 24-well tissue culture plates, and nonspecific
binding was determined with either nicotine (which easily crosses cell
membranes) or carbachol (which does not readily cross cell membranes).
As shown in Fig. 10, nicotine blocked
>95% of the [3H]EB binding sites in intact
cells, whereas in contrast, the nonpermeant carbachol blocked a maximum
of 40% of the [3H]EB binding sites even at a
concentration 25,000 times higher than its affinity constant
(Ki) for the receptor, as determined in membrane binding assays (see Table 1). Thus, we estimate that 40%
of the total number of
3/
4 receptors measured in KX
3
4R2 cell homogenates are located on the cell surface.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The KX
3
4R2 cells described here stably express
3/
4
nAChRs that bind [3H]EB with high affinity and
function to gate cations through their channels in response to
nicotinic agonists. In contrast, cells expressing the mRNA for either
the
3 or
4 subunit alone do not express
[3H]EB binding sites or cation channels that
respond to nicotine. Both [3H]EB saturation
binding and drug competition studies indicate that KX
3
4R2 cells
express a single class of nicotinic receptor binding sites; similarly,
the studies of the receptor function are consistent with a single class
of receptors. These cells produce a very high density of
3/
4
receptors, and binding studies in intact cells indicate that ~40% of
the total number of receptors are located on the cell surface. Only the
receptors on the cell surface would be expected to mediate functional
responses, whereas receptors on intracellular membranes might be in
various stages of their receptor cycle, either before insertion into
the cell surface membrane or after removal from it. Furthermore, we
cannot exclude the possibility that these cells express receptors with more than one stoichiometric combination of
3 and
4 subunits but
very similar pharmacological and functional properties. Nevertheless, these cells provide a model system in which the pharmacology, function,
and regulation of the
3/
4 nAChR can be examined in detail.
Drug binding competition studies indicated that the affinity of every
agonist examined is lower at the
3/
4 receptor binding site in
these cells than at the
4/
2 nicotinic receptor site in rat
forebrain, with affinity ratios ranging from 7 for EB to >750 for
A85380. One consequence of the lower affinity of agonists for
3/
4
receptors is that with the exception of [3H]EB,
radioligands such as [3H]cytisine,
[3H]nicotine, and
[3H]acetylcholine, which have been very useful
for labeling the
4/
2 nAChR, the predominant receptor subtype in
brain, probably would not be useful for labeling
3/
4 receptors.
This is because their lower affinities would require ligand
concentrations (200-880 nM) at which nonspecific binding
would obscure specific binding. This probably explains why these
radioligands have not been useful for labeling nicotinic receptors in
autonomic ganglia or adrenal gland, where a receptor subtype containing
3 subunits seems to predominate. Although the affinity of EB also is
lower at
3/
4 receptors than at
4/
2 receptors in brain, its
affinity at these
3/
4 receptors (300 pM) is still
very high, making it an excellent radioligand for these receptors.
The affinities of d-tubocurarine and DH
E, the two
antagonists examined that competed for the binding site, like those of the agonists, are lower at the
3/
4 receptor binding site than at
the
4/
2 binding site in brain. In fact, DH
E displays the largest difference in affinity for these two receptor subtypes of any
drug examined. Thus, DH
E, with a receptor binding site affinity
ratio of >7500, and A85380, with an affinity ratio of >750, could be
useful drugs for distinguishing between these two subtypes of nicotinic
receptors in native tissues. In addition to the absolute difference in
affinity of DH
E, a second way to distinguish between these two
receptor subtypes could be to take advantage of the difference in the
rank orders of affinities of d-tubocurarine and DH
E.
Thus, at
3/
4 receptor binding sites, d-tubocurarine
has >9 times higher affinity than DH
E, whereas in contrast, at
4/
2 binding sites, DH
E has >75 times higher affinity than
d-tubocurarine.
Consistent with a previous report (Houghtling et al., 1995
),
both d-tubocurarine and DH
E show low Hill coefficients in
competing for brain [3H]EB binding sites, which
are predominantly
4/
2 receptors. Similarly, d-tubocurarine shows a low Hill coefficient in competing for
3/
4 receptors in these transfected cells. These low Hill
coefficients suggest the interesting possibility that some antagonists
can distinguish between two states of the same receptor, for example, as the receptor conformation changed from a resting state to a desensitized state (with high affinity for agonists) during prolonged incubation with an agonist, as in the receptor binding assay.
The
3/
4 nAChR function and its pharmacology were assessed by
measuring agonist-stimulated
86Rb+ efflux. Nicotine and
acetylcholine both stimulated
86Rb+ efflux in a
concentration-dependent manner, with EC50 values of
28 and 114 µM, respectively. The difference between
the affinity of the receptor for these agonists as assessed by this
measurement of receptor function compared with binding studies (Table
1) presumably reflects the shift of the receptor to a state with high
affinity for agonists under equilibrium binding conditions. In the
cases of nicotine and acetylcholine, the EC50
values for functional activation were 59- and 129-fold higher,
respectively, than the Ki values
measured in binding studies.
Among the antagonists tested, mecamylamine, with an
IC50 value of 1 µM, was the most
potent in blocking nicotine-stimulated 86Rb+ efflux in
KX
3
4R2 cells. It was ~10 times more potent than
d-tubocurarine, 100 times more potent than DH
E, and 200 times more potent than hexamethonium. Both mecamylamine and
hexamethonium blocked receptor function by a noncompetitive mechanism,
suggesting that they block the receptor ion channel. This would explain
their effective block of receptor function in the face of their
near-total inability to compete for the agonist binding site of the
3/
4 receptor.
Tubocurarine, on the other hand, presents a more interesting case. In
the binding assay, it competes for the
3/
4 receptor agonist
recognition site with a Ki value of
23 µM (Table 1), but at similar
concentrations, its blockade of receptor function seems to be entirely
by a noncompetitive mechanism. In fact, there was no indication that
d-tubocurarine competes for the agonist binding site in the
86Rb+ efflux assay; that
is, the concentration-response curves for nicotine were not shifted to
the right in the presence of any concentration of tubocurarine tested
(Fig. 6C). One explanation for this apparent contradiction between the
binding assay and the 86Rb+
efflux assay is that in the receptor's functional state, as measured in the 86Rb+ efflux assay,
tubocurarine has virtually no affinity for the agonist recognition site
of the receptor but nevertheless very effectively blocks receptor
function noncompetitively by blocking the ion channel. However, when
the receptor conformation shifts to a desensitized state with its
higher affinity for nicotinic agonists, as occurs in the binding assay,
its affinity for tubocurarine also increases, enabling this antagonist
to then compete with micromolar affinity for the agonist recognition
site. This explanation also can account for the observation that
tubocurarine competes for the agonist recognition sites of both the
3/
4 receptor in these cells and the
4/
2 receptor in rat
brain with a low Hill coefficient because this could reflect the
different affinities of the drug for the different conformations of the
receptors. In fact, the [3H]EB saturation
binding studies shown in Fig. 7 suggest that in the presence of 30 µM tubocurarine, ~25% of the receptors may remain in a conformation with an affinity for
[3H]EB too low to be measured in a typical
binding assay.
In contrast to these other antagonists, DH
E blocked receptor
function in a competitive manner. Its affinity constant for the
functional state of the receptor, calculated from its
IC50 value in blocking nicotine-stimulated
86Rb+ efflux (after
correction for the nicotine concentration), is ~20 µM,
which is ~10 times lower than the
Ki value derived from the ligand
binding competition assays (Table 1). In other words, DH
E is ~10
times more potent in blocking receptor function than would have been
predicted from the binding assay. This suggests that DH
E has higher
affinity for the functional conformation of the receptor than for its
conformation in the desensitized state, which would occur during the
binding assay.
Activation of the
3/
4 receptor in KX
3
4R2 cells resulted in
an increase in both
[Ca2+]i and
[Na+]i. The
nicotine-stimulated increase in
[Ca2+]i was markedly
enhanced when the concentration gradient was increased by raising the
extracellular Ca2+ concentration from 1.3 to 10 mM. The higher extracellular Ca2+
concentration, however, seemed to have no effect on the
nicotine-stimulated increase in
[Na+]i. These results
suggest that extracellular Ca2+ can actually pass
through the
3/
4 receptor channel.
The
3/
4 nAChR has been expressed previously in HEK 293 cells,
both transiently (Wong et al., 1995
) and stably in
conjunction with a voltage-gated Ca2+ channel
(Stetzer et al., 1996
). Although pharmacological comparisons of these previously expressed
3/
4 nAChRs and those in the
KX
3
4R2 cells are very limited, there seems to be agreement that
acetylcholine, nicotine, and cytisine are full agonists, confirming
studies in frog oocytes (Luetje and Patrick, 1991
; Covernton et
al., 1994
; Papke and Heinemann, 1994
). However, nicotine and
acetylcholine seemed to be somewhat more potent in stimulating the
3/
4 receptors in these KX
3
4R2 cells than was reported in
the other transfected HEK 293 cells.
In conclusion, KX
3
4R2 cells provide a model system in which to
study
3/
4 receptors, a subtype that may mediate neurotransmission in autonomic ganglia and brain. These cells have maintained a high
level of receptor expression and function for >300 generations and
thus have allowed a detailed examination of the pharmacology of the
receptor. The pharmacological studies reported here, for both drug
binding and functional activation, should help in studying the
distribution, physiological role, and pharmacology of
3/
4 nAChRs
in brain and peripheral tissues. In addition, this cell line provides a
stable and convenient source of highly functional channels for
patch-clamp experiments to study in detail the electrophysiological properties of
3/
4 nAChRs (Zhang et al., 1997
).
Furthermore, the binding site of the receptor and its function in these
cells are altered by exposure to nicotinic drugs (Meyer et
al., 1997
); thus, these stably transfected cells should prove
useful in studying the chronic and acute effects of nicotinic drugs on
the density, cellular distribution, and function of
3/
4 nAChRs.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Susan Hernandez for her participation in intact cell binding assays and Parul Mehta for her assistance with tissue culture.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 18, 1997; Accepted May 11, 1998
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DA06486 and AG09973. E.L.M. was supported by National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Fellowship Grant DA05739-01.
A preliminary report of this work has been presented previously
[Xiao Y, Meyer EL, Thompson JM, and Kellar KJ (1997) Generation and
characterization of a stably transfected cell line expressing rat
3
4 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Soc
Neurosci Abstr 23:385].
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Kenneth J. Kellar, Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C. 20007. E-mail: kellark{at}gunet.georgetown.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor;
CNS, central nervous system;
EB, (±)-epibatidine;
DH
E, dihydro-
-erythroidine;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase;
[Ca2+]i, intracellular Ca2+
concentration;
[Na+]i, intracellular
Na+ concentration;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 gene product assembles with multiple acetylcholine receptor subunits to form distinctive receptor subtypes in brain.
Neuron
9:
679-691[Medline].
5,
3, and non-
3: three clustered avian genes encoding neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-related subunits.
J Biol Chem
265:
17560-17567
4.
Neuron
3:
487-496[Medline].
3
4, a novel subtype in the mammalian nervous system.
J Neurosci
16:
7892-7901
4 and
2 subunits and is up-regulated by chronic nicotine treatment.
Mol Pharmacol
41:
31-37[Abstract].
-Conotoxin MII blocks nicotine-stimulated dopamine release in rat striatal synaptosomes.
J Neurosci
17 (14):
5263-5270
- and
-subunits contribute to the agonist sensitivity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
J Neurosci
11:
837-845[Abstract].
-subunit gene expression and occurs independent of innervation.
J Neurosci
14:
2357-2364[Abstract].
3
4 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype stably expressed in transfected HEK 293 cells.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
23:
385.
2 subunit.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
142-149[Abstract].
7: a nicotinic cation channel highly permeable to calcium.
J Neurosci
13:
596-604[Abstract].
3/
4 subtype of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
FEBS Lett
397:
39-44[Medline].
2,
3,
4, and
2 neuronal nicotinic receptor subunit mRNAs in the central nervous system: a hybridization histochemical study in the rat.
J Comp Neurol
284:
314-335[Medline].
3
4, expressed in transfected eucaryotic cells.
Mol Brain Res
28:
101-109[Medline].
3
4 receptors.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
23:
385.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Decker and J. J. Galligan Cross-inhibition between nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and P2X receptors in myenteric neurons and HEK-293 cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): G1267 - G1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Armishaw, A. A. Jensen, T. Balle, R. J. Clark, K. Harpsoe, C. Skonberg, T. Liljefors, and K. Stromgaard Rational Design of {alpha}-Conotoxin Analogues Targeting {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: IMPROVED ANTAGONISTIC ACTIVITY BY INCORPORATION OF PROLINE DERIVATIVES J. Biol. Chem., April 3, 2009; 284(14): 9498 - 9512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Gonzalez-Cestari, B. J. Henderson, R. E. Pavlovicz, S. B. McKay, R. A. El-Hajj, A. B. Pulipaka, C. M. Orac, D. D. Reed, R. T. Boyd, M. X. Zhu, et al. Effect of Novel Negative Allosteric Modulators of Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors on Cells Expressing Native and Recombinant Nicotinic Receptors: Implications for Drug Discovery J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2009; 328(2): 504 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Gahring, A. V. Osborne-Hereford, G. A. Vasquez-Opazo, and S. W. Rogers Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Enhances Nicotinic Receptor Up-regulation via a p38MAPK-dependent Pathway J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2008; 283(2): 693 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. McKay, C. Chang, T. F. Gonzalez-Cestari, S. B. McKay, R. A. El-Hajj, D. L. Bryant, M. X. Zhu, P. W. Swaan, K. M. Arason, A. B. Pulipaka, et al. Analogs of Methyllycaconitine as Novel Noncompetitive Inhibitors of Nicotinic Receptors: Pharmacological Characterization, Computational Modeling, and Pharmacophore Development Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 1288 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pankratov, U. Lalo, A. Verkhratsky, and R. A. North Quantal Release of ATP in Mouse Cortex J. Gen. Physiol., March 26, 2007; 129(3): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mao, R. P. Yasuda, H. Fan, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar Heterogeneity of Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in Rat Superior Cervical and Nodose Ganglia Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1693 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Le Magueresse, V. Safiulina, J.-P. Changeux, and E. Cherubini Nicotinic modulation of network and synaptic transmission in the immature hippocampus investigated with genetically modified mice J. Physiol., October 15, 2006; 576(2): 533 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xiao, H. Fan, J. L. Musachio, Z.-L. Wei, S. K. Chellappan, A. P. Kozikowski, and K. J. Kellar Sazetidine-A, A Novel Ligand That Desensitizes {alpha}4beta2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors without Activating Them Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1454 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ohtani, T. Oka, M. Badyuk, Y. Xiao, K. J. Kellar, and J. W. Daly Mouse beta-TC6 Insulinoma Cells: High Expression of Functional {alpha}3beta4 Nicotinic Receptors Mediating Membrane Potential, Intracellular Calcium, and Insulin Release Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 899 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Barik and S. Wonnacott Indirect Modulation by {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors of Noradrenaline Release in Rat Hippocampal Slices: Interaction with Glutamate and GABA Systems and Effect of Nicotine Withdrawal Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2006; 69(2): 618 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Marritt, B. C. Cox, R. P. Yasuda, J. M. McIntosh, Y. Xiao, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Rat Retina: Simple and Mixed Heteromeric Subtypes Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1656 - 1668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Zhu, R. R. Stewart, J. M. McIntosh, and F. F. Weight Activation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Increases the Frequency of Spontaneous GABAergic IPSCs in Rat Basolateral Amygdala Neurons J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3081 - 3091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Turner and K. J. Kellar Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Rat Cerebellum: Multiple Heteromeric Subtypes J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9258 - 9265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Hernandez, S. Vicini, Y. Xiao, M. I. Davila-Garcia, R. P. Yasuda, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar The Nicotinic Receptor in the Rat Pineal Gland Is an {alpha}3{beta}4 Subtype Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2004; 66(4): 978 - 987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mamede, K. Ishizu, M. Ueda, T. Mukai, Y. Iida, H. Fukuyama, T. Saga, and H. Saji Quantification of Human Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors with 123I-5IA SPECT J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1458 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xiao and K. J. Kellar The Comparative Pharmacology and Up-Regulation of Rat Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Subtype Binding Sites Stably Expressed in Transfected Mammalian Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2004; 310(1): 98 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Parker, Y. Fu, K. McAllen, J. Luo, J. M. McIntosh, J. M. Lindstrom, and B. M. Sharp Up-Regulation of Brain Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Rat during Long-Term Self-Administration of Nicotine: Disproportionate Increase of the {alpha}6 Subunit Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 611 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Boorman, M. Beato, P. J. Groot-Kormelink, S. D. Broadbent, and L. G. Sivilotti The Effects of {beta}3 Subunit Incorporation on the Pharmacology and Single Channel Properties of Oocyte-expressed Human {alpha}3{beta}4 Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2003; 278(45): 44033 - 44040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Jensen, I. Mikkelsen, B. Frolund, H. Brauner-Osborne, E. Falch, and P. Krogsgaard-Larsen Carbamoylcholine Homologs: Novel and Potent Agonists at Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 64(4): 865 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Avila, M. I. Davila-Garcia, V. S. Ascarrunz, Y. Xiao, and K. J. Kellar Differential Regulation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in PC12 Cells by Nicotine and Nerve Growth Factor Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 64(4): 974 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alkondon, E. F.R. Pereira, and E. X. Albuquerque NMDA and AMPA Receptors Contribute to the Nicotinic Cholinergic Excitation of CA1 Interneurons in the Rat Hippocampus J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1613 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Miller, E. H. F. Wong, M. D. Chesnut, and L. P. Dwoskin Reboxetine: Functional Inhibition of Monoamine Transporters and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2002; 302(2): 687 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Abdrakhmanova, J. Dorfman, Y. Xiao, and M. Morad Protons Enhance the Gating Kinetics of the alpha 3/beta 4 Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor by Increasing Its Apparent Affinity to Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2002; 61(2): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xiao, R. D. Smith, F. S. Caruso, and K. J. Kellar Blockade of Rat alpha 3beta 4 Nicotinic Receptor Function by Methadone, Its Metabolites, and Structural Analogs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2001; 299(1): 366 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Parker, S. C. Harvey, and C. W. Luetje Determinants of Agonist Binding Affinity on Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor beta Subunits J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2001; 299(1): 385 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Meyer, Y. Xiao, and K. J. Kellar Agonist Regulation of Rat alpha 3beta 4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Stably Expressed in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2001; 60(3): 568 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Giniatullin, E. M. Sokolova, S. Di Angelantonio, A. Skorinkin, M. V. Talantova, and A. Nistri Rapid Relief of Block by Mecamylamine of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors of Rat Chromaffin Cells In Vitro: An Electrophysiological and Modeling Study Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2000; 58(4): 778 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Hernandez, M. Bertolino, Y. Xiao, K. E. Pringle, F. S. Caruso, and K. J. Kellar Dextromethorphan and Its Metabolite Dextrorphan Block alpha 3beta 4 Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2000; 293(3): 962 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Mukhin, D. Gündisch, A. G. Horti, A. O. Koren, G. Tamagnan, A. S. Kimes, J. Chambers, D. B. Vaupel, S. L. King, M. R. Picciotto, et al. 5-Iodo-A-85380, an alpha 4beta 2 Subtype-Selective Ligand for Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2000; 57(3): 642 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vailati, W. Hanke, A. Bejan, B. Barabino, R. Longhi, B. Balestra, M. Moretti, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti Functional alpha 6-Containing Nicotinic Receptors Are Present in Chick Retina Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1999; 56(1): 11 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Perry, M. I. Dávila-García, C. A. Stockmeier, and K. J. Kellar Increased Nicotinic Receptors in Brains from Smokers: Membrane Binding and Autoradiography Studies J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1999; 289(3): 1545 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, Y. Xiao, G. Abdrakhmanova, W. Wang, L. Cleemann, K.J. Kellar, and M. Morad Activation and Ca2+ Permeation of Stably Transfected alpha 3/beta 4 Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 1999; 55(6): 970 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Parker, A. Beck, and C. W. Luetje Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor beta 2 and beta 4 Subunits Confer Large Differences in Agonist Binding Affinity Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 1998; 54(6): 1132 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||