|
|
|
|
Vol. 54, Issue 4, 687-694, October 1998
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201 (J.G.G., Y.Z., Z.Z., M.J.B., S.A.B., R.A., J.C.), and Office of the Wayne County Medical Examiner, Detroit, Michigan 48207 (C.J.S.)
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A novel splice variant of RGS 9 was isolated from a rat hypothalamus,
human retina, and a human kidney (Wilm's) tumor. This variant, termed
RGS 9L, differs from the retinal form (termed RGS 9S) identified
previously in that it contains a 211- (rat) or 205- (human) amino acid
proline-rich domain on the carboxyl terminus. The pattern of RGS 9 mRNA
splicing was tissue specific, with striatum, hypothalamus- and nucleus
accumbens expressing RGS 9L, whereas retina and pineal expressed RGS 9S
almost exclusively. This pattern of mRNA splicing seemed to be highly
conserved between human and rodents, suggesting cell-specific
differences in the function of these variants. Transient expression of
RGS 9L augmented basal and
-adrenergic receptor-stimulated adenylyl
cyclase activity while suppressing dopamine D2
receptor-mediated inhibition. Furthermore, RGS 9L expression greatly
accelerated the decay of dopamine D2 receptor-induced GIRK
current. These results indicate RGS 9L inhibits heterotrimeric
Gi function in vivo, probably by acting as a
GTPase-activating protein. The human RGS 9 gene was localized to
chromosome 17 q23-24 by radiation hybrid and fluorescent in
situ hybridization analyses. The RGS 9 gene is within a
previously defined locus for retinitis pigmentosa (RP 17), a disease
that has been linked to genes in the rhodopsin/transducin/cGMP
signaling pathway.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Desensitization
is a nearly universal feature of transmembrane signaling systems, and
various mechanisms have evolved that serve to dampen intracellular
signals in the face of persistent extracellular stimulation. Until
recently, the large body of research examining G protein-mediated
signaling pathways focused mainly on involvement of receptor
phosphorylation and sequestration in the desensitization process.
However, a new class of regulators, termed RGS, has been identified
recently that influence this pathway at the level of
G
subunits (Dohlman and Thorner, 1997
; Berman and Gilman, 1998
). Members of the family share a domain (termed RGS
domain) that serves to accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of
G
subunits, thereby greatly limiting the
duration of their activity. Outside of the RGS domain, however, members
of the family are structurally diverse and can contain additional
motifs that could mediate subcellular targeting, assembly, or both of
signaling complexes. Additionally, certain RGS family members exhibit
highly restricted patterns of expression, implying cell-specific
functions.
The expression of RGS mRNAs in the central nervous system has been
recently examined, and one family member, RGS 9, was found to be
expressed almost exclusively in brain regions that receive dense
dopaminergic innervation (Gold et al., 1997
; Burchett
et al., 1998
; Thomas et al., 1998
). Moreover, a
single dose of amphetamine, which releases endogenous dopamine, greatly
reduces expression of RGS 9 mRNA (Burchett et al., 1998
). At
the time these observations were made, full-length RGS 9 had not been
isolated. We therefore sought to clone RGS 9 cDNA to characterize its
molecular and biochemical properties. This work, along with the recent
cloning of retinal RGS 9 (He et al., 1998
), demonstrates the
existence of large and small RGS 9 isoforms that are generated by
alternative RNA splicing. These splice variants show strong
tissue-specific expression that is conserved between humans and rats.
Transient heterologous expression of RGS 9L indicates that it
suppresses Gi-mediated signaling in vivo, probably by acting as a GTPase activating protein.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cloning of rat and human RGS 9.
Standard molecular
biological techniques were used for cloning procedures (Sambrook
et al., 1989
). A partial rRGS 9 cDNA (Burchett et
al., 1998
) was used to design primers for PCR-based enrichment of
RGS 9 clones from a rat hypothalamic mammalian expression cDNA library.
Enriched fractions containing 103 colony-forming
units were then screened by standard colony lift hybridization using
the partial rRGS 9 cDNA as a probe. The obtained cDNA (p374) was
sequenced on both strands by the dideoxy-chain termination technique.
Nuclease protection analysis.
Recently described RGS 9 cDNAs isolated from bovine and murine retina (He et
al., 1998
) encode proteins that are ~200 amino acids smaller
than the rat and human cDNAs we obtained, indicating the existence of
RGS 9 splice variants. RT-PCR was used to isolate a partial cDNA
encoding the small (retinal) form of RGS 9 from rat eye cup RNA. The
forward and reverse primers were GAAGCCTGTGAGGATCTGAAGTATG and
AGGAGGCAGCTCCTTTTTGAGTTG, respectively. The amplified cDNA was cloned
into pGEM 7Z, and sequence analysis demonstrated it to be the rat
ortholog of the retinal isoforms described previously (He et
al., 1998
). This construct (p403) was linearized with
HhaI and then used to generate a riboprobe for nuclease
protection analysis. Because the probe spans the alternatively spliced
exon and includes 233 nt of common sequence, it allows quantification of the large and small forms of rRGS 9 (termed RGS 9L and RGS 9S,
respectively) in a single sample. To evaluate the expression of these
variants in human brain, a 497-bp EcoRI/SphI
fragment of AA653129 was subcloned into pGEM 7Z. This construct (p385) was linearized with HinfI, and the 250-nt riboprobe
generated from this construct spans the alternatively spliced exon,
allowing detection of both forms. To evaluate expression of RGS splice variants in human retina, 3' RACE was performed on retina cDNA (Marathon Ready) with the oligonucleotide AATCTCCGATCTATAAGGACATGCTG as
the forward primer and AP1 primer (Clontech) as the reverse primer.
Because these primers are common for the large and small splice
variants present in the cDNA, both subtypes are amplified by this
technique. The relative abundance of the subtypes in the RACE products
then was determined by nuclease protection analysis using 1% of
the amplified material. Nuclease protection analysis was performed as
described previously (Granneman et al., 1997
).
In situ hybridization histochemistry.
Male
Sprague-Dawley rats (250 g; Hilltop, Scottdale, PA), maintained
in a controlled environment with free access to food and water, were
killed by decapitation. Human tissues were obtained at necropsy from
neurologically normal subjects from the Office of the Wayne County
Medical Examiner. Tissues were frozen as blocks for later processing
for in situ hybridization experiments using a previously
published protocol (Bannon and Whitty, 1997
).
[35S]CTP-labeled antisense cRNA probes were
derived from rat (Burchett et al., 1998
) and human (p385)
RGS 9 cDNAs. Specificity of hybridization signal was established by
competition with 1000-fold excess unlabeled probe.
Expression of RGS 9L.
Rat RGS 9L (in pcDNA3) or empty vector
were transiently transfected into 293T cells along with cDNAs encoding
rat
1-AR and human dopamine D2-long receptors,
as described previously (Granneman et al., 1997
). Two days
later, cells were washed and collected by gentle trituration for
testing in cAMP accumulation assays (Granneman et al.,
1998
). Briefly, cells (~5 × 104/well)
were preincubated for 20 min in Ham's F-12 medium containing 1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine. All cells were treated with 1 µM ICI 118551 to block endogenous
2-AR and then
exposed to 20 nM isoproterenol to stimulate transfected
1-AR in the presence or absence of the D2
receptor agonist quinpirole (1 µM). Reactions were
stopped after 7.5 min, and accumulated cAMP was determined by protein
binding assay (Brown et al., 1971
).
) were filled with a standard intracellular recording solution containing 130 mM
KMeSO4, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.3. Cells were continuously perfused with an
extracellular recording solution containing 111.5 mM NaCl,
30.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 0.53 mM
MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES and voltage
clamped at
90 mV. Quinpirole was administered using a fast perfusion
system (Warner Instruments) that produced solution exchanges with a
time constant <100 msec as determined by changing extracellular
potassium concentration outside the cell during the experiment. Under
our recording conditions, D2 receptor-mediated
current were inward.
Chromosomal localization of human RGS 9. PCR primers to hRGS 9 were tested with human genomic DNA to determine a set that amplified DNA within a single exon. The forward and reverse primers used were AGGAGAGTCGGGTGACCG and GTTCTCGAGCAAGTGTGTCC, respectively. The Genebridge 4 and Stanford G3 radiation hybrid panels (Research Genetics, Hunstville, AL) were screened by PCR, and results were evaluated using the Whitehead (http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu/) and Stanford Human Genome Center (http://www.shgc.stanford.edu/) radiation hybrid data servers. Further analysis was performed using the Weizmann Institute of Science Genome and Bioinfomatics Unified Database for Chromosome 17 (http://www.bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il/db17/)
FISH was performed on chromosomal slides prepared from synchronized human lymphocytes (Heng et al., 1992| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular cloning of rat and human RGS 9. A partial rRGS 9 cDNA was used to isolate a 2.4-kb cDNA that encodes a protein of 677 amino acids (Fig. 1). A BLAST search of the NCBI expressed sequence tag database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with the rRGS 9 sequence was used to identify potential clones encoding human RGS 9. One clone, AA653129 derived from a Wilm's tumor, was isolated and characterized by restriction analysis and sequencing. Because technical difficulties prevented complete sequencing of 5' end of this clone, 5' RACE was performed to complete the human sequence. To further verify the human sequence, the entire coding block of human RGS 9 was amplified from retinal cDNA and sequenced directly. Human RGS 9 cDNA encodes a protein of 674 amino acids (Fig. 1).
|
Chromosomal localization of human RGS 9.
Northern blot and
in situ hybridization analyses have demonstrated that RGS 9 is expressed in discrete regions within the central nervous system
(Gold et al., 1997
; He et al., 1998
). Because certain hereditary diseases have been linked to brain regions that
express RGS 9 (Wszolek et al., 1992
; Dryja and Li, 1995
; Chatterjee et al., 1995
), it was of interest to determine
its chromosomal localization in humans. Radiation hybrid analysis of
the Genebridge 4 panel localized human RGS 9 to the long arm of
chromosome 17, ~4.5 cR from WI-5110. Two-point maximum
likelihood analysis of the Stanford G3 panel placed RGS 9 at
SHGC-30967. Both markers have been placed ~86 Mb from 17 pter. The
localization to the long arm of chromosome 17 was confirmed with FISH
analysis, which placed hRGS 9 at 17q23-24 (Fig.
2).
|
Alternative splicing of RGS 9.
While undertaking
characterization of rat and human RGS 9, He et al., (1998)
reported the isolation of mouse and bovine RGS 9 from retina. These
retinal forms of RGS 9 are highly similar to the first 467 and 470 amino acids, respectively, of the rat and human sequence reported here
(Fig. 1). Thereafter, the nucleic acid sequence diverges dramatically,
indicating that RGS 9 is alternatively spliced to encode large (RGS 9L)
and small (RGS 9S) forms. This hypothesis was confirmed by RT-PCR
amplification and sequencing of a partial RGS 9 cDNA isolated from rat
eye cup RNA. Like the RGS 9L, RGS 9S contains the DEP and RGS domains but completely lacks the 200-amino acid proline-rich domain that constitutes the carboxyl-terminal third of the RGS 9L protein.
Tissue distribution splicing pattern of RGS 9 mRNA.
Northern
blot analysis indicated that RGS 9 expression was limited to the
central nervous system, where mRNA species of ~2.5 and ~9 kb were
observed (Fig. 3, top). The
9-kb mRNA species was greatly enriched in pineal and retina (not
shown), tissues that express genes of the phototransduction pathway
(Blackshaw and Snyder, 1997
), whereas the 2.5-kb band was enriched in
brain regions innervated by dopamine neurons (e.g., striatum and
nucleus accumbens). This pattern of expression indicates that RGS 9L
and RGS 9S are encoded by the 2.5- and 9-kb mRNA species, respectively.
The precise nature and proportion of the RGS 9 splice variants
therefore were examined by nuclease protection analysis using probes
that span the alternatively spliced exon and thus allow simultaneous
detection of RGS 9L and RGS 9S mRNAs. As shown in Fig. 3
(bottom), the pattern of RGS 9 mRNA splicing in rat brain
was strikingly tissue specific. RGS 9 mRNA within rat brain
(hypothalamus, striatum, nucleus accumbens) was nearly exclusively of
the RGS 9L form. On the other hand, RNA from eye cup (retina) and
pineal gland contained predominantly the RGS 9S mRNA form.
|
|
|
Expression of RGS 9.
A truncated RGS 9-GST fusion protein
recently was shown to accelerate GTPase activity of
Gt (transducin), and it has been proposed that
RGS 9S plays a key role in the rapid desensitization kinetics observed
in photoreceptor signal transduction. Gt is not
expressed in striatum; thus, it is likely that the RGS 9L targets
related G proteins in the striatum. We therefore examined whether RGS
9L could influence the activity of Gi proteins
in vivo. For this purpose, 293T cells were transiently
transfected with rat
1-ARs and human dopamine
D2 receptors in addition to empty vector
(pcDNA3), rRGS 9L, or human RGS 4. In cells transfected with
1-ARs
and dopamine D2 receptors alone, the
-AR
agonist isoproterenol stimulated cAMP, whereas the
D2 receptor agonist quinpirole inhibited that
activity (Fig. 6). Transfection with RGS
4, which is known to interact with Gi (Watson
et al., 1996
; Tesmer et al., 1997
), greatly
increased basal cAMP accumulation to the point that further stimulation
by
-AR activation was modest. Furthermore, isoproterenol-stimulated
activity was not suppressed by D2 receptor
stimulation. Expression of RGS 9L also significantly increased basal
(p < 0.04) and isoproterenol-stimulated
(p < 0.01) activities. Furthermore, RGS 9L
expression abrogated D2 receptor inhibition of
cAMP accumulation. Although expression of either RGS 9 or RGS 4 prevented D2 receptor-mediated suppression of
adenylyl cyclase, RGS 4 seemed to increase basal and stimulated
accumulation to a greater degree. Whether this difference can be
explained by differences in expression levels or activity is not known. In any event, these results strongly indicate that RGS 9L modulates cAMP signaling through interactions with Gi
proteins.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RGS proteins are a newly described class of signaling proteins
that suppress the activity of G proteins by promoting their deactivation. The suppression of G protein-mediated signaling is
achieved through the highly conserved RGS domain that directly interacts with G proteins and accelerates their GTPase activity (Tesmer
et al., 1997
). Outside of the conserved RGS domain, however, these proteins vary considerably in size and sequence. Furthermore, the
domains flanking the RGS core seem to be critical for functional activity in vivo (Berman and Gilman, 1998
).
In this study, we report the cloning of RGS 9L, a large splice variant
of RGS 9 that is highly expressed in forebrain regions receiving
dopamine innervation. Both the large and small RGS 9 isoforms share
common RGS and DEP domains. He et al. (1998)
have shown that
this domain in RGS 9 is sufficient to accelerate GTPase activity of
Gt in biochemical analyses. The current work
demonstrates that RGS 9L suppresses Gi-mediated
signaling in transfected cells, probably by accelerating GTPase
activity. The DEP domain is a recently recognized sequence found in
several diverse signaling molecules (Ponting and Bork, 1996
). Of the
RGS proteins cloned to date, the DEP domain is found in egl 10, RGS 7, and RGS 9. Interestingly, these RGS subtypes seem to be expressed
exclusively in the central nervous system. Although the function of the
DEP domain is not clear, it is possible that this domain is involved in
G protein functions, such as membrane excitability and secretion, that
are unique to neuronal cells.
The fundamental difference between the splice variants of RGS 9 is the
presence or absence of a 200-amino acid motif that is enriched in
proline and serine residues. Nothing is known about the functional
significance of this domain; however, several observations suggest that
it is likely to play an important role in modulating dopaminergic
neurotransmission in the brain. Proline-rich motifs often serve as
docking sites for the assembly of signal/protein complexes.
Well-studied examples are proteins with SH3 and WW domains, which
target and assemble signaling complexes through interactions with
polyproline motifs (Lim et al., 1994
; Staub and Rotlin,
1996
). Furthermore, the strong, tissue-specific pattern of RGS 9 subtype expression is conserved between rats and human, suggesting that
the polyproline motif is involved in G protein-mediated processes that
are unique to striatal and hypothalamic neurons versus retinal
photoreceptor cells and pinealocytes. Work with recombinant RGS 9L
indicates that it functions to suppress
Gi-mediated inhibition of cAMP accumulation and
GIRK activation. Whether the polyproline domain serves to more
precisely target these functions in neurons is under investigation. In
this regard, it has been noted that many proteins that associate with
synaptic vesicles contain polyproline motifs (Linial, 1994
). Clearly,
an important goal of future work will be to define roles of the DEP and
polyproline domains of RGS 9 in the organization and regulation of G
protein signaling in vivo.
The current results demonstrate that RGS 9L affects
Gs-mediated signaling by altering
Gi-mediated suppression of this pathway. Preliminary in situ hybridization analyses indicate that RGS
9L is expressed in substance P-containing neurons in the striatum (Burchett SA, Granneman JG, and Bannon MJ, unpublished observations), which are known to express an abundance of D1
dopamine receptors linked to Gs (LeMoine and
Bloch, 1995
). In this regard, we have found that release of dopamine by
the indirect agonist amphetamine strongly suppresses RGS 9 expression
in rat striatum (Burchett et al., 1998
). Thus, inhibition of
RGS 9 expression would augment the activity of Gi
proteins that oppose the D1/Gs pathway and thus
serve as a means of suppressing D1-mediated
neurotransmission. It is possible that the profound tolerance to
dopamine-augmenting drugs such as amphetamine and cocaine seen after
repeated administration could be related to alterations in RGS 9 expression or activity.
The inhibition of Gs-mediated signaling through
suppression of RGS proteins that interact with Gi
may be a more general phenomenon because cAMP suppresses expression of
RGS 4, a Gi GAP, in PC 12 cells (Pepperl et
al., 1998
). It is relevant to note that no RGS proteins have been
shown to possess GTPase-activating activity with
Gs, and it is possible that suppression of the
expression, activity, or both of RGS proteins that interact with
Gi is an important means of indirectly
suppressing Gs-mediated signaling (at least with
respect to cAMP-mediated signaling). In this regard, RGS 9 contains
three consensus protein kinase A phosphorylation sites near the RGS
domain that are conserved in all species examined to date. It is
tempting to speculate that elevation of cAMP might acutely regulate RGS
9 function and provide a rapid means of suppressing Gs-mediated signaling.
RGS 9L was also found to accelerate the decay of the dopamine
D2 receptor-induced GIRK current in transfected
CHO cells. This current is known to be activated by 
subunits
released from Gi (Kofuji et al., 1995
;
Reuveny et al., 1994
). In contrast, we found no reduction in
the amplitude of the current induced by dopamine
D2 receptor activation after transfection of the
cells with RGS 9L. Similar effects on dopamine D2
and muscarinic M2 receptor-mediated GIRK currents
also have been reported for RGS4 (Doupnik et al., 1997
) and
RGS8 (Saitoh et al., 1997
). Previous studies in central
neurons have shown that one of the clearest effects of dopamine acting
on dopamine receptors of the D2 subtype is a
membrane hyperpolarization mediated by the activation of inwardly
rectifying potassium channels (Lacey et al., 1987
, 1988
). Because such currents are now understood to be mediated by channels composed of GIRK subunits, the current results suggest a possible effect of RGS 9L in the central nervous system might be to regulate the
time course of potassium channel activation by dopamine
D2 receptors.
RGS 9 gene was localized to 17q23, very near the Whitehead marker
WI-5110 and the Stanford marker SHGC-30967. Interestingly, the cGMP PDE
subunit, which seems to interact with RGS 9S to accelerate
Gt inactivation, also maps to this general region
(Tuteja et al., 1990
; Dollfus et al., 1993
).
Search of the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/omim) indicated that
RGS 9 is within a 10-cM locus previously identified for retinitis
pigmentosa (RP 17; Bardien et al., 1995
, 1997
). Furthermore,
progressive rod-cone disease, a canine phenotypic equivalent of RP,
recently was mapped to a region syntenic with 17q21-25 (Acland
et al., 1998
). There are multiple loci for RP, but it is
significant that mutations in genes in the rhodopsin/transducin/cGMP PDE signaling pathway have been shown to produce the disease (Dryja and
Li, 1995
). For example, activating and null mutations of rhodopsin produce RP (Rosenfeld et al., 1992
; Robinson et
al., 1992
), as do mutations in the
and
subunits of cGMP
PDE (McLaughlin et al., 1993
; Huang et al.,
1995
). Furthermore, targeted disruption of murine cGMP PDE
, a
protein that seems to interact with RGS 9, results in a phenotype
resembling RP (Tsang et al., 1996
), although this subunit
has been excluded as a cause of RP17 (Bardien et al., 1997
).
These observations suggest that either overactivity or underactivity of
this G protein-mediated signaling pathway can lead to RP. RGS 9S seems
to be an important regulator of the biochemical pathway that links
rhodopsin to cGMP PDE. On the basis of its chromosomal localization,
abundant expression in retina and biochemical properties, RGS 9 is a
strong candidate for RP 17 in humans and progressive rod-cone disease
in dogs.
While undertaking our study, Thomas et al. (1998)
reported a
cDNA sequence for rat striatal RGS 9 that differs from the ones reported here. Compared with the rRGS 9L cDNA, the 5' end of the sequence of Thomas et al. is truncated by ~700 bp and thus
lacks cDNA encoding the first 214 amino acids of rRGS 9L. Instead, the 5' terminal 92 bp of the sequence of Thomas et al. contains
consensus RNA splicing signals, including a polypyrimidine tract and an acceptor splice site, indicating the presence of an intron/exon boundary. Both sequences are identical immediately after the putative intron/exon boundary. Because Northern blots indicate that the size of
RGS 9L mRNA is ~2.5 kb (Gold et al., 1997
; Burchett
et al., 1998
; current work), the 1749-bp cDNA obtained by
Thomas et al. cannot represent the major mRNA species in the
striatum. To further demonstrate this, we probed a Northern blot with a 5' fragment of RGS 9L cDNA that does not exist in the sequence of
Thomas et al. and found that it identifies the same 2.5-kb mRNA detected with the full-length probe (Granneman JG, unpublished observations). Moreover, antibodies to an epitope on the carboxyl terminus of RGS 9L that is common to both sequences detect a single band of ~77 kDa, as predicted from translation of the current sequence (Granneman JG, unpublished observations). Together,
these observations indicate that the cDNA described by Thomas et
al. (1998)
probably was derived from truncated, incompletely
spliced mRNA.
In summary, two RGS 9 subtypes are expressed in the central nervous system. RGS 9L is a novel splice variant that contains a novel proline-rich carboxyl-terminal domain and is abundantly expressed in forebrain regions receiving dopamine innervation. This isoform suppresses Gi function in transfected cells. RGS 9S is abundantly expressed in retina and pineal gland, and its demonstrated biochemical properties and chromosomal localization indicate it may be involved in degenerative retinal disease.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Donald Rao (Icogen, Seattle, WA) for the gift of the hypothalamic library, Robert MacKenzie (Parke Davis, Ann Arbor, MI) for RGS4 cDNA, H. A. Lester (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA) for GIRK cDNAs, Archana Chaudhry (Wayne State University, Detroit, MI) for preliminary nuclease protection analysis, and Helena Kuivaneimi and Gerard Tromp for advice on genetic linkage analysis.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 1, 1998; Accepted June 18, 1998
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK46339 and DK37006 (J.G.G.), DA06470 and NS34935 (M.J.B.), and MH43985 (R.A.).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. James Granneman, Cell Biology, Parke-Davis Research Labs, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
RGS, regulator of G protein
signaling;
rRGS, rat regulator of B protein signaling;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
RT, reverse transcription;
RACE, rapid
amplification of cDNA ends;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
EGTA, ethylene
glycol bis(
-aminoethyl
ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid;
HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid;
AR, adrenergic receptor;
nt, nucleotide(s);
FISH, fluorescence in
situ hybridization;
PDE, phosphodiesterase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|

-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
10461-10466
1- and
3-adrenergic receptors: involvement of the seventh transmembrane region in conferring subtype specificity.
Mol Pharmacol
53:
856-861
1a-adrenergic receptor protein and mRNA in brown adipose tissue by neural and
3-adrenergic stimulation.
Mol Pharmacol
51:
644-650
subunits and function as heteromultimers.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
6542-6546
-subunit of rod phosphodiesterase in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
Nat Genet
4:
130-134[Medline].
subunits.
Nature (Lond)
370:
143-146[Medline].
: stabilization of the transition state for GTP hydrolysis.
Cell
89:
251-261[Medline].
subunit of the rod cGMP phosphodiesterase.
Science (Washington D C)
272:
1026-1029[Abstract].
-subunits.
Nature (Lond)
383:
172-175[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Martemyanov, C. M. Krispel, P. V. Lishko, M. E. Burns, and V. Y. Arshavsky Functional comparison of RGS9 splice isoforms in a living cell PNAS, December 30, 2008; 105(52): 20988 - 20993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gu, A. Anton, S. Salim, K. J. Blumer, C. W. Dessauer, and S. P. Heximer Alternative Translation Initiation of Human Regulators of G-Protein Signaling-2 Yields a Set of Functionally Distinct Proteins Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Gold, C. V. Hoang, B. W. Potts, G. Porras, E. Pioli, K. W. Kim, A. Nadjar, C. Qin, G. J. LaHoste, Q. Li, et al. RGS9 2 Negatively Modulates L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine-Induced Dyskinesia in Experimental Parkinson's Disease J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14338 - 14348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fu, X. Huang, L. Piao, A. N. Lopatin, and R. R. Neubig Endogenous RGS proteins modulate SA and AV nodal functions in isolated heart: implications for sick sinus syndrome and AV block Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2532 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bouhamdan, H.-D. Yan, X.-H. Yan, M. J. Bannon, and R. Andrade Brain-Specific Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 9-2 Selectively Interacts with {alpha}-Actinin-2 to Regulate Calcium-Dependent Inactivation of NMDA Receptors J. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 26(9): 2522 - 2530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Garzon, M. Rodriguez-Munoz, A. Lopez-Fando, and P. Sanchez-Blazquez Activation of {micro}-Opioid Receptors Transfers Control of G{alpha} Subunits to the Regulator of G-protein Signaling RGS9-2: ROLE IN RECEPTOR DESENSITIZATION J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 8951 - 8960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Traynor and R. R. Neubig REGULATORs OF G PROTEIN SIGNALING & DRUGS OF ABUSE Mol. Interv., February 1, 2005; 5(1): 30 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cabrera-Vera, S. Hernandez, L. R. Earls, M. Medkova, A. K. Sundgren-Andersson, D. J. Surmeier, and H. E. Hamm RGS9-2 modulates D2 dopamine receptor-mediated Ca2+ channel inhibition in rat striatal cholinergic interneurons PNAS, November 16, 2004; 101(46): 16339 - 16344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Jones, D. P. Siderovski, and S. B. Hooks The G{beta}{gamma} DIMER as a NOVEL SOURCE of SELECTIVITY in G-Protein Signaling: GGL-ing AT CONVENTION Mol. Interv., August 1, 2004; 4(4): 200 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Keresztes, K. A. Martemyanov, C. M. Krispel, H. Mutai, P. J. Yoo, S. F. Maison, M. E. Burns, V. Y. Arshavsky, and S. Heller Absence of the RGS9{middle dot}G{beta}5 GTPase-activating Complex in Photoreceptors of the R9AP Knockout Mouse J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1581 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Chatterjee, Z. Liu, and R. A. Fisher Human RGS6 Gene Structure, Complex Alternative Splicing, and Role of N Terminus and G Protein {gamma}-Subunit-like (GGL) Domain in Subcellular Localization of RGS6 Splice Variants J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 30261 - 30271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zhang, M. A Pacheco, and C. A Doupnik Gating properties of girk channels activated by g{alpha}o- and G{alpha}i-Coupled Muscarinic m2 Receptors in Xenopus Oocytes: The Role of Receptor Precoupling in RGS Modulation J. Physiol., December 1, 2002; 545(2): 355 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hollinger and J. R. Hepler Cellular Regulation of RGS Proteins: Modulators and Integrators of G Protein Signaling Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 54(3): 527 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Rahman, S. J. Gold, M. N. Potenza, C. W. Cowan, Y. G. Ni, W. He, T. G. Wensel, and E. J. Nestler Cloning and Characterization of RGS9-2: A Striatal-Enriched Alternatively Spliced Product of the RGS9 Gene J. Neurosci., March 15, 1999; 19(6): 2016 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. He, T. J. Melia, C. W. Cowan, and T. G. Wensel Dependence of RGS9-1 Membrane Attachment on Its C-terminal Tail J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 48961 - 48966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||