|
|
|
|
Vol. 55, Issue 2, 195-201, February 1999
Molecular Pharmacology Group, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with epinephrine, the relative intrinsic activity of a
series of partial agonists to activate fusion proteins between the
porcine alpha-2A adrenoceptor and the
-subunit of
Gi1 was reduced after a single-point mutation
(Cys351Gly) in the G protein. Although UK14304 was close to
a full agonist at the fusion construct containing wild-type
(Cys351)Gi1
, it was a partial agonist at
that containing Gly351Gi1
. Moreover,
although clonidine functioned as a good partial agonist to activate the
fusion protein containing Cys351Gi1
, it was
essentially an antagonist at the
Gly351Gi1
-containing fusion protein. By
contrast, incorporation of Ile351Gi1
into
the fusion protein resulted in all partial agonists displaying higher
intrinsic activity relative to epinephrine to activate this fusion
protein than the one containing the wild-type G protein sequence.
This is the first demonstration that the relative intrinsic activity
of a series of agonists can be modified by a point mutation in a G
protein rather than a receptor and indicates that the nature of a key
contact site between a G protein and a receptor can selectively regulate partial agonist function. We provide a model for this based on
the hydrophobicity of a key receptor-G protein
-subunit interaction interface.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ligand
efficacy and intrinsic activity are key concepts in pharmacology
(Stephenson, 1956
; Hoyer and Boddeke, 1993
; Clarke and Bond, 1998
).
They are usually equated simply with the "strength" of an agonist
ligand to transmit signal after binding to a receptor. However, a
molecular understanding of the basis of these parameters would provide
novel insights into the conformational alterations induced by agonist
binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that result in G protein
activation. It is particularly interesting in this regard that the
relative intrinsic activity of partial agonists at the
beta-2 adrenoceptor has been noted to be increased after
mutations of this GPCR that result in degrees of agonist-independent signal transduction (Lefkowitz et al., 1993
; Samama et al., 1993
). Such
mutations are generically described as constitutively active mutations
(CAMs) (Lefkowitz et al., 1993
; Samama et al., 1993
).
Relative intrinsic activity can be measured at a range of points in a
signaling cascade. However, due to cross-talk between pathways and
varying levels of amplification throughout such cascades, differences
in levels of expression of the GPCR and altered GPCR/G protein
expression ratios can result in variations in this parameter when using
distal points for analysis (Whaley et al., 1994
; MacEwan et al., 1995
).
Therefore, a proximal assay point such as ligand-induced G protein
activation provides a highly appropriate level for such measurements.
We constructed a series of fusion proteins between the porcine
alpha-2A adrenoceptor and the
-subunit of the G protein Gi1 (Wise and
Milligan, 1997
; Wise et al., 1997a
,b
; Burt et al., 1998
). Because their
construction defines that the ratio of expressed GPCR to G protein is
always maintained at 1:1 and agonist function can be measured as
activation of the GTPase activity of the G protein within the fusion
construct, these have particular value in assessing relative intrinsic
activity of a series of agonists (Wise et al., 1997a
). We recently
examined the effectiveness of a series of agonists after transient
expression of an alpha-2A adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein that was
rendered insensitive to the actions of pertussis toxin by mutation of
Cys351 of the G protein to Gly (Wise et al.,
1997a
). We were surprised to note that a number of
alpha-2A adrenoceptor partial
agonists, including clonidine, functioned more poorly compared with
epinephrine than might have been expected. To understand the basis for
these observations, we constructed further
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion proteins in which the
only difference was the nature and identity of the amino acid at
residue 351 of the G protein sequence. We note that partial agonists
vary in intrinsic activity relative to epinephrine with the identity of
this amino acid. All partial agonists display reduced relative
intrinsic activity at alpha-2A adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
compared with alpha-2A adrenoceptor
wild-type (Cys351)Gi1
,
whereas they all display enhanced relative intrinsic activity to
stimulate alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
.
We provide a model for this based on the hydrophobicity of a key GPCR-G
protein
-subunit interaction interface.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
All materials for tissue culture were supplied by
Life Technologies, Inc. (Paisley, Strathclyde, Scotland).
[3H]RS-79948-197 (90 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham
International (Buckinghamshire, U.K.). [
-32P]GTP (30 Ci/mmol) was obtained from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA).
Pertussis toxin (240 µg/ml) and all other basic chemicals were
purchased from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, U.K.) or Boehringer-Mannheim (Mannhein, Germany) and were of the highest purity available. Reagents
for molecular biological manipulation were obtained from Promega
(Madison, WI).
Construction of Alpha-2A
Adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
and
Alpha-2A
Adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
Fusion
Constructs.
The porcine alpha-2A
adrenoceptor (Guyer et al., 1990
) was obtained from Dr. L. E. Limbird (Vanderbilt University, TN). A Cys351Gly mutant of
rat Gi1
was linked to the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor as described
previously to generate alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
(Wise et al., 1997a
)
and ligated into the KpnI and EcoRI sites
of the eukaryotic expression vector pcDNA3 (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA).
Wild-type (Cys351) and Ile351 rat
Gi1
cDNAs in pcDNA3 (Bahia et al., 1998
) were digested with the restriction enzymes SacII and
EcoRI. The 1.3-kb fragments so produced were recovered
and ligated with alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
in pCDNA3 from which
the equivalent 1.3-kb SacII/EcoRI fragment had been removed. This resulted in generation of
alpha-2A adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
and
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
in pcDNA3.
Cell Culture and Transfection.
COS-7 cells were maintained
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% (v/v) newborn
calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were seeded onto 60-mm culture dishes and
grown to 60 to 80% confluency (18-24 h) before transfection with
pCDNA3 containing the relevant cDNA species using Lipofectamine reagent
(Life Technologies, Inc.) (Wise et al., 1997b
). For transfection, 2.5 to 2.8 µg of DNA was mixed with 10 µl of Lipofectamine in 0.2 ml of
Opti-MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) and incubated at room temperature
for 30 min before the addition of 1.8 ml of Opti-MEM. COS-7 cells were
exposed to the DNA/Lipofectamine mixture for 5 h. Then, 2 ml of
20% (v/v) newborn calf serum in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
was added to the cells. Cells were harvested 48 h after
transfection. In a number of experiments, cells were treated for the
final 24 h before cell harvest with pertussis toxin (50 ng/ml).
Preparation of Membranes.
Plasma membrane-containing P2
particulate fractions were prepared from cell pastes that had been
stored at
80°C after harvest as described previously (McKenzie and
Milligan, 1990
).
[3H]RS-79948-197 Binding Studies.
Binding
assays were initiated by the addition of 5 µg of protein to an assay
buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl, 50 mM sucrose, 20 mM MgCl2, pH
7.5) containing [3H]RS-79948-197 (Wise and Milligan,
1997
; Wise et al., 1997a
,b
) (1 nM). Nonspecific binding was determined
in the presence of 100 µM idazoxan. Reactions were incubated at
30°C for 45 min, and bound ligand was separated from free ligand by
vacuum filtration through GF/C filters. The filters were washed with
3 × 5 ml of assay buffer, and bound ligand was estimated by
liquid scintillation spectrometry.
High-Affinity GTPase Assays.
High-affinity GTPase assays
were performed as described previously (Wise and Milligan, 1997
; Wise
et al., 1997a
,b
). Nonspecific GTPase was assessed by parallel assays
containing 100 µM GTP. All experiments were performed at least three
times on membranes prepared from individual cell transfections.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recently reported that the GTPase activity of a fusion protein
between the porcine alpha-2A
adrenoceptor and the
-subunit of a pertussis toxin-resistant
(Cys351Gly) mutant of the G protein
Gi1 can be stimulated by addition of the
alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist UK14304 (Wise et
al., 1997a
). To characterize agonist regulation of the enzymic
properties of this fusion protein in detail, it was transiently
expressed in COS-7 cells. Membranes were prepared, and the stimulation
of high-affinity GTPase activity by a series of 10 alpha-2
adrenoceptor agonists was measured at maximally effective
concentrations of each ligand (Fig. 1).
The natural ligands epinephrine and norepinephrine produced the
greatest levels of stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity. UK14304 was clearly a partial agonist in comparison with epinephrine and norepinephrine (Fig. 1), as were a series of other ligands, including dexmeditomidine, BHT933, xylazine, and clonidine. It was
of interest to note that oxymetazoline, which is often described as a
high-affinity partial agonist with selectivity for the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor over the other
alpha-2 adrenoceptor subtypes (Jasper et al.,
1998
) had little capacity to activate the GTPase activity of the fusion
protein (Fig. 1). Other ligands, such as clonidine, also displayed
substantially reduced relative intrinsic activity compared with
epinephrine to values reported in the literature (Jasper et al., 1998
).
These values were unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment of the cells
before membrane preparations (data not shown). Such results confirm
that, as demonstrated previously (Wise et al., 1997a
), in such
transient transfections little or none of the agonist-mediated GTPase
activity reflects stimulation of endogenously expressed pertussis
toxin-sensitive G proteins but instead indicates activation of the
fusion protein-linked G protein.
|
It was clearly possible that the limited effects of clonidine,
oxymetazoline, and certain other ligands reflected structural constraints imposed by the nature of the fusion protein. However, because amino acid 351 of Gi1
is within
the C-terminal domain known to be a key contact site between GPCRs
and G proteins (Bourne, 1997
; Hamm, 1998
), we wanted to explore whether
a single-point mutation at this position could regulate intrinsic
activity in an agonist-dependent manner. A fusion protein between the
porcine alpha-2A adrenoceptor and the
-subunit of wild-type
(Cys351)Gi1 was thus
constructed and expressed in COS-7 cells in parallel with that
containing Gly351Gi1
.
When examining the fusion protein containing the wild-type G protein,
the relative intrinsic activity of all of the partial agonists was
substantially greater compared with epinephrine than the values
obtained at the fusion protein containing
Gly351Gi1
(Fig. 1).
Indeed, UK14304 now displayed activity that was 90% of that of
epinephrine and norepinephrine, clonidine displayed relative intrinsic
activity of some 40%, and oxymetazoline was a clear partial agonist
(Fig. 1).
Because we recently produced evidence in cotransfection experiments
using the porcine alpha-2A
adrenoceptor that UK14304 is able to activate
Ile351Gi1
to a greater
extent than Cys351Gi1
(Bahia et al., 1998
), we also generated a fusion protein between the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor and
Ile351Gi1
. After
expression of this fusion protein, the capacity of the same series of
ligands to stimulate high-affinity GTPase activity was examined. Now,
compared with epinephrine and norepinephrine, all of the ligands that
functioned as partial agonists at
alpha-2A adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
displayed higher intrinsic activity relative to epinephrine (Fig. 1)
with UK14304 now acting as a full agonist.
The effects of UK14304 at each of the three fusion proteins were then
analyzed in detail over a range of concentrations and compared with a
maximally effective concentration of epinephrine (Fig.
2). In addition to enhanced relative
intrinsic activity, as noted above, at the Ile > Cys > Gly351Gi1
-containing
fusion proteins, the potency of UK14304 followed the same profile with
EC50 values of 2.9 ± 0.5 × 10
8 M
(Ile351) > 7.3 ± 0.6 × 10
8 M
(Cys351) > 3.2 ± 0.4 × 10
7 M
(Gly351) (Fig. 2).
|
As an alternative means to explore variation in agonist relative
intrinsic activity with alteration in residue 351 of the G protein,
each of the alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
,
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
,
and alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion proteins expressed in membranes of COS-7 cells were stimulated
by a concentration of epinephrine (100 µM) that was maximally
effective at all three constructs. The capacity of varying
concentrations of the alpha-2A
adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine or the partial agonist clonidine to
modulate the effects of epinephrine was then assessed (Fig.
3). In membranes expressing alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
,
yohimbine fully inhibited the effect of epinephrine in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3, top). Yohimbine was also able
to fully attenuate the GTPase activity of the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
and alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion proteins that had been stimulated by 100 µM epinephrine. However, the IC50 for yohimbine in these assays
was higher at alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
(1.4 ± 0.2 × 10
6 M) than at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
fusion protein (3.0 ± 0.5 × 10
7 M)
and higher again (7.4 ± 1.5 × 10
6
M) at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion protein (Fig. 3. top). Clonidine also inhibited the effects of
epinephrine (Fig. 3, bottom) with IC50 values of (Gly) 4.8 ± 0.5 × 10
6
M, (Cys) 2.5 ± 1.3 × 10
5 M, and (Ile) 4.1 ± 0.4 × 10
5 M.
However, much more obvious than these variations in potency for
clonidine was the variation in maximal effect. At maximally effective
concentrations, clonidine was able to reduce the effects of epinephrine
to close to basal activity at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
fusion protein (Fig. 3, bottom). By contrast, maximally effective
concentrations of clonidine resulted in only partial reductions of the
epinephrine-stimulated GTPase activity at both the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
and alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion proteins (Fig. 3, bottom). Analysis of such experiments provided
estimates for the relative intrinsic activity of clonidine compared
with epinephrine of 6 ± 2% at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
fusion protein, 37 ± 7% at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
fusion protein, and 64 ± 8% at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion protein (Fig. 3, bottom). As such, clonidine was again shown to
function as a reasonable partial agonist at the fusion protein
containing the wild-type G protein sequence, a better one after
substitution of Cys351 to Ile but akin to an
antagonist after the single amino acid substitution of
Cys351 to Gly in the G protein.
|
The antagonist [3H]RS-79948-197 displays
similar affinity to bind to each of the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
,
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
,
and alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion proteins (Carr et al., 1998
; and data not shown). The affinity
of yohimbine to compete for the specific binding of
[3H]RS-79948-197 was not different among the
three fusion proteins (Ki = 3.1-4.0 × 10
9 M)
(Fig. 4, top, and Table
1). Epinephrine, clonidine, and
oxymetazoline were also able to compete fully for the specific binding
of [3H]RS-79948-197 to the three fusion
proteins (Fig. 4, bottom; and data not shown). However, although
neither clonidine nor epinephrine displayed significant differences in
affinity to compete for the binding of
[3H]RS-79948-197 to the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
and alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion proteins, they both displayed some 2-fold lower affinity to
compete for binding to the alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
fusion protein (Table 1).
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The basis of relative agonist intrinsic activity is a major
practical as well as theoretical issue in pharmacological studies (Stephenson, 1956
; Hoyer and Boddeke, 1993
; Clarke and Bond, 1998
). Although generally considered as the "strength" of the agonist to
generate and promote a signal, in molecular terms it must reflect the
capacity of the ligand to stabilize a conformation of the GPCR able to
activate a cognate G protein. Considerable interest has been accorded
observations of mutations in GPCRs that result in receptor activity in
the absence of agonist ligands (Lefkowitz et al., 1993
; Samama et al.,
1993
). So-called CAM GPCRs have been considered to be likely to provide
insights into conformations of wild-type receptors that are stabilized
on addition of agonist ligands. Interestingly, given the results of
this study, a regularly observed feature of a number of CAM GPCRs has
been the enhanced relative intrinsic activity of partial agonist
ligands compared with their effects at the wild-type GPCR
(Lefkowitz et al., 1993
; Samama et al., 1993
).
If the relative intrinsic activity of agonists to transmit a signal
from GPCR to G protein can be modified by structural alterations in the
GPCR, it should be inherently true that modifications in G protein
structure should also alter this parameter. Moreover, this might be
anticipated to be particularly obvious if such alterations in the G
protein were located at key contact sites with GPCRs. Although certain
mutations in G proteins are known to prevent guanine nucleotide
exchange and/or hydrolysis (Bourne, 1997
), these would not be
anticipated to result in more subtle modifications of relative
intrinsic activity of different agonists.
The details of interfacial surfaces responsible for productive GPCR-G
protein interactions have yet to be fully mapped. However, the extreme
C-terminal domain of G protein
-subunits certainly is a key contact
site (Bourne, 1997
; Hamm, 1998
). In the Gi family of G proteins, a conserved Cys residue 4 amino acids from the C
terminus acts as the acceptor for ADP-ribose transferred catalytically from NAD+ by pertussis toxin. This modification
essentially attenuates productive interactions between receptors and
this family of G proteins. Members of the Gi
family are routinely coexpressed, and therefore a null background is
lacking for expression and functional studies. As such, a number of
groups have generated mutations in Gi family
members in which this Cys residue has been converted to either Ser or
Gly to render the proteins insensitive to the actions of pertussis
toxin (Hunt et al., 1994
; Senogles, 1994
; Chuprun et al., 1997
; Wise et
al., 1997c
; Yamaguchi et al., 1997
). Such mutant proteins have been of
great use, but little attention has been paid to the effects these
mutations may have on the detailed pharmacology of signal transduction.
Recently, we converted Cys351 of
Gi1
into every possible amino acid. After
individual coexpression of each of these with the porcine
alpha-2A adrenoceptor, we demonstrated
a spectrum in the capacity of the agonist UK14304 to stimulate binding
of
[35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate
to these mutants (Bahia et al., 1998
).
We have also been developing the use of fusion proteins between GPCRs
and G protein
-subunits to examine the details of interactions between specific pairs of signaling polypeptides (Wise and Milligan, 1997
; Wise et al., 1997a
,b
; Burt et al., 1998
). This strategy provides
a wealth of useful features, including the knowledge that the
expression ratio of GPCR and G protein must be 1:1, the necessity of
proximity of the protein partners after expression, and, most important
for the current study, the capacity to consider and analyze the
construct as an agonist-activated GTPase on which detailed enzyme
kinetics and pharmacology can be performed.
The first construct we generated was between the porcine
alpha-2A adrenoceptor and a pertussis
toxin-insensitive Cys351Gly mutant of
Gi1
(Wise et al., 1997b
). This produced
excellent responses to both epinephrine and UK14304, which were used to provide direct turnover numbers for agonist-induced guanine nucleotide hydrolysis. However, we noted that oxymetazoline, which is routinely described as a high-affinity and
alpha-2A adrenoceptor-selective partial agonist (Jasper et al., 1998
), failed to cause any significant stimulation of the high-affinity GTPase activity of the fusion construct (Fig. 1). Furthermore, certain other agonists displayed substantially weaker intrinsic activity compared with epinephrine than
routinely reported in the literature (Fig. 1). These observations could
be viewed as evidence that the fusion protein approach was flawed and
not useful for detailed pharmacological analysis. However, we selected
to explore a more interesting possibility (i.e., that the
Cys351Gly mutation in
Gi1
selectively limited its activation in a
manner that was dependent on the intrinsic activity of the ligand). Expression of fusion proteins between the porcine
alpha-2A adrenoceptor and wild-type
(Cys351)Gi1
and
Ile351Gi1
confirmed this
concept (Fig. 1). For the fusion protein containing wild-type G protein
sequence, the relative intrinsic activity compared with epinephrine was
now increased for all the partial agonists at
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
.
Importantly, their relative intrinsic activity was further increased
when we examined a fusion protein containing
Ile351Gi1
(Figs. 1 and
2).
To explore this in greater detail, the capacity of clonidine to compete
with epinephrine for stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity was
compared at each construct. As a control, we demonstrated that
maximally effective concentrations of the alpha-2
adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine would fully compete with
epinephrine (Fig. 3, top). It was noted, however, that although the
binding affinity of yohimbine was identical at the three fusion proteins, as might be anticipated for an antagonist, the potency of
this ligand to compete for epinephrine-stimulated GTPase activity was
not. Yohimbine potency increased in the order
Gly351> Cys351 > Ile351 (Fig. 3, top). This was not inherently
surprising because the potency of UK14304 to stimulate the GTPase
activity of the three fusion proteins also varied but in the reverse
order (Fig. 2). It is also noteworthy that in cotransfection
experiments with the porcine alpha-2A
adrenoceptor and residue 351 mutants of Gi1
, the potency of UK14304 increased, as did the maximal capacity of the
individual forms of Gi1
to be stimulated
(Bahia et al., 1998
).
Clonidine was able to compete with epinephrine for stimulation of
high-affinity GTPase activity at each of the three fusion constructs
(Fig. 3, bottom). However, at maximally effective concentrations of
clonidine, the results were very different. At the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor-Cys351Gi1
fusion protein, stimulated GTPase activity was reduced to some 40% of
that produced by epinephrine. This value was in good accord with that
obtained from the direct addition of clonidine (Fig. 1). This is a
reflection that as clonidine competes with epinephrine to fill the
ligand-binding site of the fusion protein population, the asymptote
reached when clonidine has fully displaced epinephrine must reflect the
relative intrinsic activity of clonidine compared with epinephrine.
However, this value was distinctly different at the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
fusion protein. At maximally effective concentrations, clonidine was
almost as effective as yohimbine in suppressing epinephrine-stimulated
GTPase activity, with an estimated relative intrinsic activity of only
7%. Most interestingly, when using the
alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Ile351Gi1
fusion protein, clonidine displayed a relative intrinsic activity of
some 60% (Fig. 3, bottom). Confirmation that these results were not
related simply to a low affinity of clonidine to occupy the binding
site of the alpha-2A
adrenoceptor-Gly351Gi1
fusion protein compared with those containing
Cys351Gi1
or
Ile351Gi1
was produced
in classical [3H] ligand-binding studies. The
alpha-2 adrenoceptor antagonist [3H]RS-79948-197 displayed equal affinity to
bind to each fusion construct. Clondine and epinephrine were each able
to fully compete with the antagonist for binding at each fusion protein
construct, and the higher affinity of clonidine compared with
epinephrine for this site (Fig. 4, bottom) ensured that clonidine would
compete effectively with epinephrine in the GTPase inhibition studies (Fig. 3, bottom).
The capacity of UK14304 to stimulate binding of
[35S]GTP
S to residue 351 mutants of
Gi1
is highly correlated with the hydrophobicity of the amino acid at this position (Bahia et al., 1998
).
Furthermore, hydrophobic Leu residues are found invariantly throughout
the family of mammalian G protein
-subunit at positions
3 and +2
in relation to this site. An obvious hypothesis is that these
interactions would benefit from additional hydrophobicity at residue
351. An interpretation of the effects noted herein is that "strong"
full agonists can overcome a suboptimal GPCR-G protein interface in
this region to produce sufficient stabilization and interaction to
allow effective G protein activation. By contrast, "weak" partial
agonists are even more ineffective in attempting to promote G protein
activation when this GPCR-G protein interface is made less hydrophobic
in character.
These results offer a conceptually simple, but highly attractive,
picture of how agonist relative intrinsic activity is manifest after
binding to the alpha-2A adrenoceptor
to allow activation of the G protein Gi1
and
how it can be modulated. Hydrophobic interfaces are clear candidates
for determining the effectiveness of protein-protein interactions. It
will be of considerable interest to analyze whether this is true for
activation of Gi1
by other GPCRs and, indeed,
for activation of other G proteins by the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor. It is
noteworthy in this regard that a 4-amino acid motif of the M2
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, which is distinctly hydrophobic
(Val385, Thr386,
Ileu389, and Leu390) and
which is predicted to lie on one face of an
helix close to the
interface of the third intracellular loop and sixth transmembrane region, has been demonstrated to have selective capacity to interact with the C-terminal portion of Gi family G
proteins (Liu et al., 1995
). Related Val- and Leu-rich sequences are
commonly found at the water-lipid interface at the end of the predicted
third intracellular loop and sixth transmembrane element of many
Gi-linked GPCRs. Furthermore, the Thr residue of
this motif is particularly conserved in GPCRs with related function.
Mutation of this Thr in the human
alpha-2A adrenoceptor has been
reported to cause constitutive activity (Ren et al., 1993
). Based on
the results provided herein, mutational analysis of this region of the
alpha-2A adrenoceptor might also be
predicted to provide further novel insights into the basis of
agonist-relative intrinsic activity and the selectivity of GPCR-G
protein interactions.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the Medical Research Council for financial support. D.S.B. thanks the Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council for award of a CASE Studentship.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 16, 1998; Accepted November 10, 1998
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Graeme Milligan, Davidson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, U.K. E-mail: g.milligan{at}bio.gla.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; CAM, constitutively active mutant.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
determines the extent of activation by the
2A-adrenoceptor.
Biochemistry
37:
11555-11562[Medline].
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein results in activation of both receptor- linked and endogenous G proteins: Comparisons of their contributions to GTPase activity and signal transduction and analysis of receptor-G protein activation stoichiometry.
J Biol Chem
273:
10367-10375
: Effects on
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein activation.
FEBS Lett
428:
17-22[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor.
Mol Pharmacol
48:
316-325[Abstract].
2-adrenergic receptor: Extending the ternary complex model.
J Biol Chem
268:
4625-4636.
-adrenergic receptor modifies agonist stimulation of adenylyl cyclase: A quantitative evaluation.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
481-489[Abstract].
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein.
FEBS Lett
419:
141-146[Medline].
when constrained within an
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein.
Biochem J
325:
17-21.
2A-adrenoceptor and acylation minus forms of Gi1
by expressing the proteins from chimaeric open reading frames.
J Biol Chem
272:
24673-24678This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q. Zhang, M. Okamura, Z.-D. Guo, S. Niwa, and T. Haga Effects of Partial Agonists and Mg2+ Ions on the Interaction of M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor and G Protein G{alpha}i1 Subunit in the M2-G{alpha}i1 Fusion Protein J. Biochem., May 1, 2004; 135(5): 589 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-J. Feng, E. Kellett, C. A. Scorer, J. Wilde, J. H. White, and G. Milligan Selective Interactions between Helix VIII of the Human {micro}-Opioid Receptors and the C Terminus of Periplakin Disrupt G Protein Activation J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33400 - 33407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Pankevych, V. Korkhov, M. Freissmuth, and C. Nanoff Truncation of the A1 Adenosine Receptor Reveals Distinct Roles of the Membrane-proximal Carboxyl Terminus in Receptor Folding and G Protein Coupling J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 30283 - 30293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Benians, J. L. Leaney, G. Milligan, and A. Tinker The Dynamics of Formation and Action of the Ternary Complex Revealed in Living Cells Using a G-protein-gated K+ Channel as a Biosensor J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2003; 278(12): 10851 - 10858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Leaney, A. Benians, F. M. Graves, and A. Tinker A Novel Strategy to Engineer Functional Fluorescent Inhibitory G-protein alpha Subunits J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28803 - 28809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Welsby, E. Kellett, G. Wilkinson, and G. Milligan Enhanced Detection of Receptor Constitutive Activity in the Presence of Regulators of G Protein Signaling: Applications to the Detection and Analysis of Inverse Agonists and Low-Efficacy Partial Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2002; 61(5): 1211 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wurch, J. Okuda, and P. J. Pauwels Reciprocal Modulation of alpha 2A-Adrenoceptor and Galpha o Protein States as Determined by Carboxy-Terminal Mutagenesis of a Galpha o Protein Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 666 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Millan, D. Cussac, G. Milligan, C. Carr, V. Audinot, A. Gobert, F.'o. Lejeune, J.-M. Rivet, M. Brocco, D. Duqueyroix, et al. Antiparkinsonian Agent Piribedil Displays Antagonist Properties at Native, Rat, and Cloned, Human alpha 2-Adrenoceptors: Cellular and Functional Characterization J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2001; 297(3): 876 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Pauwels, S. Tardif, T. Wurch, and F. C. Colpaert Facilitation of Constitutive alpha 2A-Adrenoceptor Activity by Both Single Amino Acid Mutation (Thr373Lys) and Galpha o Protein Coexpression: Evidence for Inverse Agonism J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2000; 292(2): 654 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Waldhoer, A. Wise, G. Milligan, M. Freissmuth, and C. Nanoff Kinetics of Ternary Complex Formation with Fusion Proteins Composed of the A1-Adenosine Receptor and G Protein alpha -Subunits J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 1999; 274(43): 30571 - 30579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kellett, I. C. Carr, and G. Milligan Regulation of G Protein Activation and Effector Modulation by Fusion Proteins between the Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A Receptor and the alpha Subunit of Gi1alpha : Differences in Receptor-Constitutive Activity Imparted by Single Amino Acid Substitutions in Gi1alpha Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 684 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bofill-Cardona, O. Kudlacek, Q. Yang, H. Ahorn, M. Freissmuth, and C. Nanoff Binding of Calmodulin to the D2-Dopamine Receptor Reduces Receptor Signaling by Arresting the G Protein Activation Switch J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2000; 275(42): 32672 - 32680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cavalli, K. M. Druey, and G. Milligan The Regulator of G Protein Signaling RGS4 Selectively Enhances alpha 2A-Adreoreceptor Stimulation of the GTPase Activity of Go1alpha and Gi2alpha J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2000; 275(31): 23693 - 23699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||