|
|
|
|
Vol. 55, Issue 3, 508-514, March 1999
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire (M.R.D., R.H.C.), and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa (A.E.G., N.O.A.)
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability of inhibitors selective for the type 5 phosphodiesterase
isozyme (PDE5) to act on the photoreceptor PDE isozyme (PDE6, the
central effector enzyme for visual transduction) is poorly understood.
Because PDE5 inhibitors are currently used as therapeutic agents,
it is important to assess the potency and mechanism of action of this
class of PDE inhibitor on PDE6. We show that E4021 (sodium
1-[6-chloro-4-(3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl)-aminoquinazolin-2-yl]piperidine-4-carboxylate sesquihydrate) inhibits activated PDE6 (KI = 1.7 nM) as potently as PDE5. This makes E4021 the most potent
inhibitor of PDE6 discovered to date. The effectiveness of E4021 to
inhibit nonactivated PDE6 (with bound inhibitory
subunits) is
reduced 40-fold compared with the activated enzyme. Furthermore, at
intermediate E4021 concentrations and high cGMP concentrations,
nonactivated PDE undergoes activation of cGMP hydrolysis rather than
inhibition. We demonstrate direct competition of E4021 and the
subunits for binding to the catalytic site. Measurements of cGMP
binding to noncatalytic regulatory sites on the catalytic subunits of PDE6 rule out an allosteric effect of E4021 by direct binding to these
noncatalytic sites. We conclude that E4021 is a competitive inhibitor
of cGMP hydrolysis and that the
subunit also competes with both
E4021 and substrate for catalytic site binding. An understanding of the
effects of PDE5-targeted drugs on retinal PDE6 requires a knowledge of
the complex interactions among substrate, drug, and inhibitory
subunit at the catalytic site of both nonactivated and activated forms
of PDE6.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
phosphodiesterase (PDE) isozymes found in rod and cone photoreceptor
cells of the retina belong to a large family of cyclic nucleotide PDEs
that catalyze cAMP and cGMP hydrolysis. The photoreceptor PDE
[constituting the photoreceptor phosphodiesterase (PDE6) subfamily] is the central effector enzyme involved in the pathway of visual excitation in vertebrate photoreceptors (Pfister et al., 1993
; Pugh and
Lamb, 1993
; Takemoto et al., 1993
; Helmreich and Hofmann, 1996
). In the
dark-adapted state, the rod PDE holoenzyme consists of a catalytic
heterodimer (P
) tightly associated with two inhibitory
subunits (P
); this 

2 holoenzyme is
the nonactivated state of the enzyme. The carboxyl terminus of the P
subunit is thought to directly bind to the active site and inhibit cGMP
hydrolysis in a competitive manner (Granovsky et al., 1997
). Activation
of the visual pigment rhodopsin by illumination results in activation of the retinal G protein transducin. The activated form of
transducin relieves the inhibitory constraint of the P
subunit
and activates PDE >300-fold in vitro (Arshavsky et al., 1992
).
Subsecond decreases in cGMP levels resulting from light-activated PDE6
directly regulate the cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel, leading to
the photoreceptor receptor potential (Koutalos and Yau, 1993
; Yarfitz
and Hurley, 1994
; Palczewski and Saari, 1997
). In addition to the
catalytic sites, the
and
subunits of PDE6 contain noncatalytic
cGMP binding sites, which can bind 2 mol of cGMP/mol of PDE holoenzyme with high affinity (Yamazaki et al., 1980
; Gillespie and Beavo, 1989b
;
Cote and Brunnock, 1993
). Activation of PDE by transducin reduces the
binding affinity of cGMP at the noncatalytic sites (Yamazaki et al.,
1982
; Cote et al., 1994
).
The PDE6 subfamily is most closely related to the PDE5 (cGMP binding,
cGMP-specific PDE) isozyme, as judged by several criteria: 1)
similarity of the amino acid sequence of the catalytic subunits (McAllister-Lucas et al., 1993
); 2) strong preference for cGMP over
cAMP as a substrate (Baehr et al., 1979
; Thomas et al., 1990
); 3)
presence of a putative PDE5-associated, low-molecular-weight protein
immunologically related to the PDE6 P
subunit (Lochhead et al.,
1997
); and 4) pharmacological properties (Gillespie and Beavo, 1989a
).
In the only pharmacological comparison of the efficacy of different PDE
inhibitors to block PDE6 catalysis, Gillespie and Beavo (1989a)
reported that two inhibitors that preferentially act on PDE5 (i.e.,
zaprinast and dipyridamole) were also good inhibitors of PDE6.
Surprisingly, these two drugs could also activate PDE6 catalysis under
certain conditions (Gillespie and Beavo, 1989a
). However, this study
was unable to determine the molecular basis by which these drugs
exerted both inhibitory and stimulatory effects on PDE6.
The interest in PDEs as molecular targets of drug action has grown with
the development of isozyme-selective PDE inhibitors that offer potent
inhibition of selected isozymes without the side effects attributed to
nonselective inhibitors such as theophylline. PDE5-selective inhibitors
show promise as therapeutic agents in several areas, including
pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases (Sybertz et al., 1995
). However,
little is known about the potency, selectivity, and mechanism of action
of PDE5-selective inhibitors with PDE6. We have chosen to examine E4021
(Takase et al., 1993
, 1994
; Saeki et al., 1995
), a PDE5 inhibitor that
is significantly more potent and selective than zaprinast (an early
PDE5 inhibitor) and comparable in its PDE inhibitory properties to
sildenafil (Viagra; Ballard et al., 1998
), a drug recently approved for
the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
In this article, we report on the mechanism of action of E4021 on both
the nonactivated and activated forms of rod PDE6 because both states
are relevant to understanding how PDE5-selective inhibitors may alter
signal transduction pathways in photoreceptor cells. Our results are
consistent with a single site of action of E4021 at the catalytic site
of the enzyme. However, the effects of E4021 on PDE6 depend on whether
the P
subunits are associated with the catalytic P
dimer. We
conclude that the mutually exclusive binding of drug, P
, and cGMP at
the catalytic site must be accounted for when evaluating the potency
and selectivity of PDE5-targeted drugs to alter PDE6 activity in
retinal photoreceptor cells.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
E4021 was a gift of Eisai Co., Ltd. (Tokyo,
Japan), and zaprinast was a gift from Rhone-Poulenc Rorer (Dagenham,
UK). Stock solutions of the PDE inhibitors were prepared as follows:
100 mM E4021 was prepared fresh daily in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone; 400 mM zaprinast was dissolved in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone and stored for
up to 3 months at
20°C; and 600 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) was prepared in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone and stored at
20°C.
Preparation of PDE.
Purified frog rod outer segments (ROS)
were isolated in the dark (using infrared illumination) using
modifications of a method described previously (Cote and Brunnock,
1993
). Briefly, frog retinas were removed from enucleated eyes, and ROS
were detached from the retinas by gentle shaking into a Ringer's
solution containing 5% Percoll. The ROS were then purified by
centrifugation in a discontinuous Percoll gradient consisting of 5%,
30%, and 60% Percoll. After dilution of the Percoll with Ringer's
and brief centrifugation of the ROS (1 min at 3000g), the
ROS were resuspended in the appropriate assay medium and homogenized at
4°C using a nylon pestle and glass mortar. No structure was
detectable by phase-contrast microscopy after homogenization.
Endogenous nucleotides were depleted by incubating the homogenized ROS
at room temperature for
30 min; this treatment has been shown to
remove >95% of the endogenous, bound cGMP (Cote and Brunnock, 1993
).

; Dumke et al., 1994
subunits, we performed
limited proteolysis to degrade the inhibitory P
subunits (Hurley and
Stryer, 1982
/mol of P
inhibited >90% of the enzyme activity and restored its ability to
undergo stimulation by E4021 (under the conditions described in Fig.
4), demonstrating that the activation by trypsin was directed at the
P
subunits and did not significantly affect the catalytic sites of
the enzyme.
PDE Activity Assay.
Nucleotide-depleted PDE was diluted to
45 µl with PDE activity assay medium. Unless indicated, PDE was
preincubated with the inhibitor for 15 min at 21°C before initiating
the PDE activity assay with the addition of 5 µl of the cGMP
substrate. The reaction was stopped by quenching 10-µl samples in 50 µl of 100 mM HCl at various times. To quantify the amount of cyclic
nucleotide that was hydrolyzed, each sample was neutralized with 50 µl of 100 mM Trizma base, treated with 10 µl of 12.5 mg/ml snake
venom (to convert the 5'-nucleoside monophosphate to the nucleoside plus inorganic phosphate), and analyzed using either a radiotracer assay followed by separation of nucleotides by diethylaminoethyl anion
exchange chromatography (Kincaid and Manganiello, 1988
) or a
colorimetric assay to quantify the amount of inorganic phosphate (Artemyev et al., 1998
). Total substrate hydrolysis was <30% in all
experiments. The calculation of the rate of cyclic nucleotide hydrolysis was based on three to six individual time points during which the time course remained linear.
Filter Binding Assay of cGMP Binding to Noncatalytic Sites of
PDE.
Nucleotide-depleted PDE holoenzyme was diluted to 7.5 nM with
binding assay medium and incubated overnight at 4°C with 10 mM EDTA
to prevent hydrolysis of [3H]cGMP used in the
binding assay. [EDTA inhibits hydrolytic activity by chelating
divalent cations, which are a required cofactor for catalysis
(Srivastava et al., 1995
). The long incubation period for effective
inhibition probably reflects slow dissociation of divalent cations from
the active site due to high-affinity binding of P
to this region
(Granovsky et al., 1997
). The effects of EDTA on PDE function were
limited to inhibition of the catalytic site and were fully reversible
on the addition of excess Mg2+.] The PDE was
then mixed with the indicated concentration of PDE inhibitor, and
preincubated for 15 min at 21°C. The sample was cooled to 4°C, and
the binding assay was initiated with [3H]cGMP
(final PDE concentration, 3 nM). After incubating for 1 h at
4°C, 50-µl samples were filtered in duplicate on prewet
nitrocellulose filters (HAWP 025; Millipore) using a vacuum manifold
system. PDE activity measurements showed that
2% of the cGMP was
hydrolyzed during the filter binding assay in the absence of PDE inhibitor.
Fluorescent Assay of P
-1-83BC Binding to PDE.
The
ability of E4021 to displace P
bound to P
was measured with a
fluorescence assay essentially as described previously (Granovsky et
al., 1997
; Artemyev et al., 1998
). Briefly, a mutant of P
was
constructed in which the four C-terminal residues were replaced with a
cysteine; this mutant was then labeled with
3-(bromoacetyl)-7-diethylaminocoumarin to form P
-1-83BC.
P
-1-83BC (10 nM) was mixed with 3.6 nM trypsin-activated PDE. To
perform the fluorescence measurements, the trypsin-activated PDE was
separated from the ROS membranes by centrifugation (180,000g for 5 min at 21°C) before addition to the cuvette.
-1-83BC
with P
was monitored in an Aminco-Bowman Series 2 luminescence spectrometer in 600 µl of modified PDE assay buffer (lacking protease inhibitors and with BSA reduced to 0.1 mg/ml). Fluorescence was monitored with excitation at 445 nm and emission at 495 nm. The displacement of bound P
-1-83BC by E4021 was determined by adding increasing concentrations of drug to the cuvette (total volume change,
<3%). Control experiments indicated that E4021 addition alone caused
no fluorescence change to
-1-83BC solutions. Assays were conducted
at equilibrium.
Data Analysis.
Dose-response curves at a single substrate
concentration and in the absence of drug-induced stimulation were fit
to the Hill equation using nonlinear least-squares analysis. The
IC50 value determined in this way was related to
the drug inhibition constant (KI) by
the following equation (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973
):
KI = IC50/(1 + [S]/KM), where [S] is the
substrate concentration, KM is the
Michaelis constant, and the mechanism of inhibition is assumed to be
competitive. For nonactivated PDE holoenzyme, a KM value for cGMP (95 µM) was
verified in our laboratory to be the same as that reported earlier
(Dumke et al., 1994
); for trypsin-activated PDE, the
KM for cGMP hydrolysis was
experimentally determined to be 21.8 ± 2.2 µM (mean ± S.E.M., n = 7). Kinetic analyses over a range of cGMP
and E4021 concentrations were used to more accurately determine the
KI value using a Dixon plot (Segel,
1975
). Analysis of fluorescence data was performed as described
previously (Granovsky et al., 1997
). All experiments were repeated at
least three times, and average values are reported as the mean ± S.E.M.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
E4021 Is a Simple Competitive Inhibitor of Activated PDE6.
We
first examined the potency of E4021 to inhibit the activated form of
frog rod PDE6 in which the P
subunits have been removed by limited
proteolysis. We found that E4021 is able to effectively inhibit
catalysis at an IC50 value of 70 nM (Fig.
1). This value is 20- and 3000-fold lower
than the IC50 values for zaprinast (a prototype
PDE5 inhibitor) and IBMX (a nonselective PDE inhibitor), respectively
(Fig. 1). With the IC50 data in Fig.1 and
knowledge of the KM value for
trypsin-activated PDE (21.8 ± 2.1 µM), we can calculate
KI values of 1.6 nM for E4021, 32 nM
for zaprinast, and 4.7 µM for IBMX. These results indicate that E4021
is the most potent inhibitor of PDE6 identified to date.
|
|
PDE Holoenzyme Is Inhibited by E4021 in a Complex Manner.
Because PDE is normally associated with its P
subunits in vivo, we
next tested the relative potency of E4021 to inhibit PDE holoenzyme
(

2) that was not activated. The
hydrolytic activity of this PDE preparation is low compared with the
maximum rate attainable for fully activated PDE; the basal rate
reflects the equilibrium binding of the P
subunits to the catalytic
P
dimer (Hurley and Stryer, 1982
; Wensel and Stryer, 1986
). The
PDE holoenzyme preparation was incubated with inhibitor 15 min to
permit the inhibitor to attain binding equilibrium at the catalytic
site. After preincubation with the drug, the hydrolytic activity of PDE
was determined by the addition of 200 µM cGMP. Figure
3 shows that even though the cGMP
concentration (200 µM) is 5-fold less than that shown in Fig. 1,
higher concentrations of PDE5-selective drugs were needed to inhibit
50% of the PDE activity of the nonactivated holoenzyme compared with
the activated catalytic dimer. In contrast, IBMX displayed a similar
potency of inhibition for nonactivated holoenzyme and activated PDE. To
quantify the difference in the ability of E4021 to inhibit nonactivated
and activated PDE, a Dixon plot was also constructed for PDE holoenzyme
at several cGMP and E4021 concentrations. The lines intersected at a
single point above the x-axis with a
KI value of 70 nM; the slope replot was linear and intersected the y-axis at the origin (data not shown).
These results are consistent with E4021 acting as a pure competitive
inhibitor of cGMP hydrolysis at the active site. However, the presence
of the P
subunits associated with the P
catalytic dimer reduce
the inhibitory potency of the drug ~40-fold compared with the
activated P
dimer.
|
subunits
are associated with P
was obtained by examining the behavior of
the drug at high cGMP concentrations. Previously, it has been reported
that at
1 mM cGMP concentrations, zaprinast can stimulate cGMP
hydrolysis of bovine rod PDE holoenzyme; this stimulatory effect was
not seen for activated PDE (Gillespie and Beavo, 1989a
|
E4021 Interacts Very Weakly with Noncatalytic cGMP Binding Sites on
PDE Holoenzyme.
Previous work has shown that high-affinity binding
of cGMP to the noncatalytic binding sites on PDE requires that P
be
associated with the catalytic P
dimer (Yamazaki et al., 1980
;
Cote et al., 1994
); we verified for this study that trypsin-activated
PDE (in which the P
subunits have been proteolyzed) was unable to
bind [3H]cGMP (<0.2 mol of cGMP/mol of
P
; M.R. D'Amours and R.H. Cote, unpublished
observations). We then reasoned that the differences in how
E4021 acts on the activated P
dimer (Fig. 1) versus the nonactivated PDE holoenzyme (Figs. 3 and 4) might be related to the
occupancy of the noncatalytic sites by cGMP in the latter case.
subunit in the complex
effects of E4021 on PDE holoenzyme, we avoided the use of P
to
suppress cGMP hydrolysis, as had been done previously (Gillespie and
Beavo, 1989a
2% of the total added
[3H]cGMP used for the binding assays.
Figure 5 shows that both E4021 and
zaprinast are only weakly able to displace
[3H]cGMP from the noncatalytic binding sites on
PDE, whereas IBMX is even less effective in competing at these sites.
In contrast, unlabeled cGMP is
1000-fold more potent than these drugs
in competing with radiolabeled cGMP at the noncatalytic sites (Fig. 5,
dashed line). Note that E4021 and zaprinast do not substantially differ in their ability to displace cGMP at the noncatalytic sites (Fig. 5),
whereas E4021 is 20-fold more potent than zaprinast as a catalytic site
inhibitor (Fig. 1). This suggests that the weak effect of these
PDE5-selective drugs on [3H]cGMP binding is
being exerted directly at the noncatalytic sites and is not an
allosteric effect of drug binding to the catalytic sites. These results
are consistent with previous work demonstrating the high specificity
for cGMP binding exhibited by noncatalytic cGMP binding sites (Hebert
et al., 1998
|
E4021 Is a Competitive Inhibitor of P
Binding to Catalytic Site
on PDE.
Having ruled out the noncatalytic cGMP binding sites on
PDE as the site by which E4021 can activate PDE holoenzyme, we
considered other potential drug binding sites that might account for
the anomalous behavior of E4021. Although all of the unusual effects of
E4021 are exhibited only when P
is present, we consider it very
unlikely that E4021 can bind directly to P
because the P
subunit
lacks sufficient secondary and tertiary structure (Berger et al., 1997
)
to form a high-affinity binding pocket for E4021 or other
PDE5-selective drugs. Rather, it seems most likely that E4021 occupies
a high-affinity binding site on P
that also is a site of
interaction with the P
subunit. Although a novel drug-binding site
on PDE cannot be excluded, we first considered whether the effects of
E4021 on PDE could be ascribed to high-affinity binding at the active
site of the enzyme in direct competition with P
binding there.
subunit (P
-1-83BC) that retains its ability to bind to and
inhibit cGMP hydrolysis of bovine rod P
dimers; the fluorescent
probe attached at the truncated C-terminal end of P
undergoes a
fluorescence change on binding to the active site of the enzyme
(Granovsky et al., 1997
-1-83BC, a 5-fold maximal increase in fluorescence occurred in a
dose-dependent fashion. This fluorescence change was reversed on
addition of recombinant, unlabeled P
subunits, demonstrating the
specificity of the fluorescence change. Figure 6 shows that the addition of increasing
amounts of E4021 to the P
/P
-1-83BC complex resulted in a
progressive displacement of the fluorescent P
mutant with an
IC50 value of 15 nM and a Hill coefficient of
1.1. Although the actual KI value for
E4021 competition with P
-1-83BC cannot be determined from this
data, it must be less than the IC50 value. This
high-affinity competition of E4021 with P
at the active site is
consistent with the high-affinity competition of E4021 with cGMP
(KI = 1.7 nM) to block hydrolysis. We
conclude from this result that E4021, the fluorescent probe portion of
P
-1-83BC, and cGMP all bind in a mutually exclusive fashion to the
catalytic site on P
. This ability of PDE5-selective inhibitors to
compete not only with cyclic nucleotides but also with the binding of
endogenous P
inhibitory subunits provides the most reasonable
explanation for the complex behavior these drugs have on the PDE6
holoenzyme (see Discussion).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results demonstrate that E4021 is the most potent inhibitor of
PDE6 studied to date. However, it appears that although PDE5-selective
inhibitors may show good discrimination of PDE5 from most other PDE
isoforms, there is likely to be poor discrimination of these drugs
between PDE5 and PDE6 isozymes. Our results also demonstrate that the
efficacy and mechanism of drug inhibition depend on the subunit
composition and state of activation of PDE6. Activated PDE (lacking
bound P
) is inhibited by E4021 (Fig. 1) or zaprinast (Gillespie and
Beavo, 1989a
) (Fig. 1) in a simple competitive manner, whereas the
nonactivated PDE holoenzyme (containing bound P
) is affected by
PDE5-selective inhibitors in a complex manner that depends on several
factors. Our results rule out a major effect of E4021 on the
noncatalytic sites on PDE and support a mechanism of action in which
E4021, P
, and cGMP all compete in a mutually exclusive manner at the
active site.
Comparison of Potency and Selectivity of E4021 with Other
PDE5-Selective Inhibitors.
With a
KI value of 1.7 nM for the activated
enzyme, E4021 is the most effective pharmacological inhibitor of PDE6
thus far reported. By comparison, older PDE5-selective drugs such as
zaprinast and dipyridamole are >10-fold less potent in inhibiting the
activated PDE6. Recently, another PDE5-selective drug, sildenafil, was
reported to inhibit nonactivated bovine PDE6 with a
KI value of 30 nM (Ballard et al.,
1998
), ~2-fold lower than the KI
value for E4021 inhibition of nonactivated frog PDE6 (see
Results). Based on the 40-fold increase in potency of E4021
with activated PDE, we predict that sildenafil may also act much more
potently (KI ~ 1 nM) on the activated form of PDE6.
Mutually Exclusive Competitive Binding of E4021 and P
at Active
Site Can Account for Complex Effects of E4021 on PDE Holoenzyme.
The high affinity with which E4021 can both inhibit cGMP hydrolysis at
the active site of PDE and displace a fluorescently labeled P
mutant
(Fig. 6) supports the idea that E4021 exerts its complex effects on PDE
holoenzyme solely through direct binding of the drug at the
active site. We describe how the KI
shift and the apparent stimulation of hydrolysis by E4021 can be
explained by a model in which P
, E4021, and cyclic nucleotides
compete for binding to the active site of PDE.

) with nonactivated
PDE (

2) is a consequence of the
competition between drug and P
subunit for mutually exclusive binding at the active site. This system of two pure competitive inhibitors is expected to behave similarly to a single competitive inhibitor (Segel, 1975
binding to the active site of the enzyme. Removal of the competing P
increases the apparent potency of E4021 by eliminating this
competition. The value of 1.7 nM for the
KI value of E4021 with activated PDE represents the intrinsic affinity of the drug to bind to and inhibit hydrolysis at the active site.
The ability of E4021 to stimulate cGMP hydrolysis of nonactivated PDE
holoenzyme under the conditions of Fig. 4 can be explained by the
action of E4021 in reducing the concentration of PDE containing P
bound at the active site. Before incubation with E4021, P
bound to
PDE holoenzyme is in equilibrium with free P
. Because the
KD value for P
binding is in the
low picomolar range for bovine (Wensel and Stryer, 1986
and are unable to hydrolyze cGMP. When E4021 is added at
concentrations that exhibit stimulation of hydrolysis (~100 nM; Fig.
4), the drug displaces some bound P
at the active site to give a
population of P
/E4021 complexes. With submillimolar levels of
cGMP, the substrate cannot be hydrolyzed because it cannot compete
effectively with E4021 bound at the catalytic site; this reasoning is
supported by the 104 difference in relative
binding affinities of E4021 (KI = 1.7 nM) compared with cGMP (KM = 22 µM).
Thus, no apparent activation of cGMP hydrolysis is seen. However, at
very high (
1 mM) substrate concentrations, cGMP can effectively
compete with and displace E4021 bound to P
, leading to elevated
cGMP hydrolytic rates. The stimulatory effect of E4021 is confined to a
limited range of concentrations (30-1000 nM with 10 mM substrate)
because lower drug concentrations would not displace bound P
from
PDE holoenzyme, whereas higher concentrations of E4021 would require
proportionately higher cGMP concentrations than those we tested to be
effective in competing with the drug.
In conclusion, E4021 is able to inhibit catalysis at the active site of
PDE6 better than any other known phosphodiesterase inhibitor. The
potency of E4021 for inhibiting activated PDE6 is comparable to the
effects of the drug on PDE5, making E4021, and probably other
PDE5-targeted drugs, essentially nonselective in its inhibitory potency
for PDE5 versus PDE6. The presence of an inhibitory P
subunit that
binds tightly to PDE6 in its nonactivated state has a pronounced effect
on the potency of E4021. The simplest model that accounts for our
observations is that E4021 binds in a mutually exclusive manner in
competition with the P
subunit at the active site of the enzyme.
Thus, it will be important to carefully evaluate the extent to which
PDE5-selective drugs can act on both the nonactivated and activated
forms of the retinal PDE6 isozymes. Future efforts should be directed
toward identifying the differences that exist in the active sites of
PDE5 and PDE6 to design inhibitors that discriminate PDE5 from PDE6
with high selectivity.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Karen Sanborn and Kathleen McCarthy for technical support during the initial phase of the research.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 19, 1998; Accepted November 13, 1998
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY-05798 (R.H.C.) and EY-10843 (N.O.A.) and by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station (Scientific Contribution 1972).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Rick H. Cote, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824-3544. E-mail: rick.cote{at}unh.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
E4021, sodium
1-[6-chloro-4-(3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl)-aminoquinazolin-2-yl]piperidine-4-carboxylate
sesquihydrate;
PDE, phosphodiesterase;
P
, inhibitory
subunit of
type 6 phosphodiesterase;
P
, catalytic heterodimer of type 6 phosphodiesterase;
PDE5, cGMP-binding cGMP phosphodiesterase;
PDE6, photoreceptor phosphodiesterase;
ROS, rod outer segments;
zaprinast, 2-o-propoxyphenyl-8-azapurin-6-one;
IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine;
KD, dissociation constant;
KI, drug inhibition
constant;
P
-1-83BC, recombinant P
mutant in which residues
83-87 are deleted and replaced with a cysteine, followed by labeling
with 3-(bromoacetyl)-7-diethylaminocoumarin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunits: A putative regulatory mechanism of the rod photoresponse.
J Biol Chem
267:
24501-24507
subunit and cyclic GMP with specific binding sites on catalytic subunits.
Methods
14:
93-104[Medline].
subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase blocks the enzyme catalytic site.
J Biol Chem
272:
11686-11689
subunit of the photoreceptor cGMP phosphodiesterase.
J Biol Chem
272:
18397-18403This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Zhang, Q. Feng, and R. H. Cote Efficacy and Selectivity of Phosphodiesterase-Targeted Drugs in Inhibiting Photoreceptor Phosphodiesterase (PDE6) in Retinal Photoreceptors Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3060 - 3066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Norton, M. R. D'Amours, H. J. Grazio, T. L. Hebert, and R. H. Cote Mechanism of Transducin Activation of Frog Rod Photoreceptor Phosphodiesterase. ALLOSTERIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE INHIBITORY gamma SUBUNIT AND THE NONCATALYTIC cGMP-BINDING SITES J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38611 - 38619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||