|
|
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 3, 485-493, September 1999
2-Adrenergic Signaling Fails To
Modulate L-Type Ca2+ Current in Mouse Ventricular
Myocytes
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A receptor can be activated either by specific ligand-directed changes
in conformation or by intrinsic, spontaneous conformational change. In
the
2-adrenergic receptor (AR) overexpression transgenic (TG4) murine heart, spontaneously activated
2AR
(
2-R*) in the absence of ligands has been evidenced by
elevated basal adenylyl cyclase activity and cardiac function. In the
present study, we determined whether the signaling mediated by
2-R* differs from that of a ligand-elicited
2AR activation (
2-LR*). In ventricular myocytes from TG4 mice, the properties of L-type
Ca2+ current (ICa), a major effector of
2-LR* signaling, was unaltered, despite a
2.5-fold increase in the basal cAMP level and a 1.9-fold increase in
baseline contraction amplitude as compared with that of wild-type (WT)
cells. Although the contractile response to
2-R* in TG4
cells was abolished by a
2AR inverse agonist, ICI118,551
(5 × 10
7 M), or an inhibitory cAMP analog,
Rp-CPT-cAMPS (10
4 M), no change was detected in the
simultaneously recorded ICa. These results suggest that the
increase in basal cAMP due to
2-R*, while increasing
contraction amplitude, does not affect ICa characteristics. In contrast, the
2AR agonist, zinterol elicited a
substantial augmentation of ICa in both TG4 and WT cells
(pertussis toxin-treated), indicating that L-type Ca2+
channel in these cells can respond to ligand-directed signaling. Furthermore, forskolin, an adenylyl cyclase activator, elicited similar
dose-dependent increase in ICa amplitude in WT and TG4 cells, suggesting that the sensitivity of L-type Ca2+
channel to cAMP-dependent modulation remains intact in TG4 cells. Thus,
we conclude that
2-R* bypasses ICa to
modulate contraction, and that
2-LR* and
2-R* exhibit different intracellular signaling and
target protein specificity.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenergic
receptor (AR) stimulation plays a prominent role in modulation of
cardiac myocyte performance in response to an increased peripheral
demand. Driven by sympathetic neurotransmitters and adrenal hormones,
AR activation regulates virtually all major steps of the cardiac
cell excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling cascade, e.g., the
sarcolemmal L-type Ca2+ current
(ICa), sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)
Ca2+ release and reuptake, and the responsiveness
of contractile myofilaments to cytosolic Ca2+.
Because ICa provides the trigger for SR
Ca2+ release, and is a major determinant of
intracellular calcium homeostasis, modulation of this current by
AR
system has been extensively studied over the last two decades. It has
been demonstrated that both
1AR and
2AR subtypes coexist in cardiac myocytes in many mammalian species, and that stimulation of each of these receptor
subtypes increases cardiac ICa (Xiao and Lakatta,
1993
; Cerbai et al., 1995
) through the classic stimulatory G protein (Gs)-adenylyl cyclase-cAMP-protein kinase A (PKA)
signaling cascade (Hartzell et al., 1991
; Zhou et al., 1997
; Skeberdis
et al., 1997
; Xiao et al., 1999
). The existence and functional
importance of a more rapid, direct interaction of the
AR-activated
Gs and L-type Ca2+ channel
remain controversial (Yatani and Brown, 1989
; Hartzell et al., 1991
;
Zhou et al., 1997
; Skeberdis et al., 1997
).
A prevailing receptor theory (two-state model) states that a G
protein-coupled receptor, such as
1AR or
2AR, exists in an equilibrium between two
conformational states: an inactive (R) state and an active (R*) state,
the latter having high affinity for G proteins (Bond et al., 1995
). In
the absence of a receptor agonist, spontaneous transition between the
R* and R states results in a constitutive or intrinsic activation of
only minority of receptors (Chidiac et al., 1994
; Bond et al., 1995
)
and thus the functional significance of R* is not always evident. The
presence of a large number of spontaneously activated
2ARs (
2-R*s), which alter basal function, has been experimentally demonstrated in a
transgenic (TG) murine model, the TG4 mouse (Milano et al., 1994
; Bond
et al., 1995
; Xiao et al., 1999
), in which the human
2AR is overexpressed by ~200-fold in a
cardiac-specific manner. Hence, this transgenic model provides a unique
opportunity to study the transmembrane signal transduction originating
from unliganded
2-R* in comparison with that
from the ligand-activated
2AR
(
2-LR*). According to the two-state
receptor model,
2-R* ought to be identical with
2-LR*, because there is only a
single active conformational state. However, there is no a priori
reason that this has to be the case. By analogy to ionic channels and
enzymes, it is more plausible that a receptor may possess multiple,
distinct active conformations (Perez et al., 1996
; Gurdal et al.,
1997
). If
2-R* and
2-LR* differ in their active
conformational states, spontaneous and agonist-induced
2-adrenergic signaling may not be functionally
equivalent, e.g., in modulating their target proteins, such as L-type
Ca2+ channels.
In the present study, we examined the possible modulatory effects of
2-R* on basal ICa and
cell contraction in single ventricular myocytes and on basal cAMP in
myocardium from TG4 mice and wild-type (WT) littermates. Surprisingly,
we found no evidence that ICa was regulated by
2-R* in TG4 heart cells. In contrast, both
2-LR* signaling in the presence of
pertussis toxin (PTX) and direct adenylyl cyclase activation by
forskolin augmented ICa to an extent similar to
that observed in WT cells. Our results support the idea that despite
many similarities,
2-R* and
2-LR* may represent distinct
functional conformation states of the receptor, eliciting different
intracellular signaling patterns, and having differential effects on
target proteins. These findings require an extension of the current
model of
2AR to encompass multiple active
conformational states.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Isolation and Measurement of Contraction.
Single murine
cardiac myocytes were isolated from the hearts of 2- to 3- month-old
mice via a standard enzymatic technique (Korzick et al., 1997
).
Briefly, hearts were retrogradely perfused with collagenase B and
protease using the Langendorff method. Cells were shaken loose from the
heart after this perfusion and then suspended in HEPES buffer solution
consisting of: 1 mM CaCl2, 137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM
KCl, 15 mM dextrose, 1.3 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, and 20 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4, adjusted with NaOH. Ca2+ tolerant cells
were kept at 37°C, with or without incubation with 1.5 µg/ml PTX
for at least 3 h, as described previously (Xiao et al., 1995
).
Ca2+ Current Measurement.
ICa was measured via the whole-cell patch clamp
technique using an Axopatch 1D amplifier (Axon Instruments Inc., Foster
City, CA). Low-resistance (1-2 M
) micropipettes were pulled via a
two-stage micropipette puller (model P-97; Sutter Instrument Co.,
Novato, CA). The average series resistance (Rs)
in whole-cell configuration was 5.71 ± 0.28 M
for TG4 cells
(n = 34) and 5.99 ± 0.39 M
for WT cells
(n = 25), and routinely compensated ~70% in our
experiments. To selectively examine ICa, cells
were voltage-clamped at
40 mV to inactivate the sodium and T-type
Ca2+ channels. Potassium currents were inhibited
by appropriate blockers in the extracellular HEPES buffer solution (4 mM 4-aminopyridine, 5.4 mM CsCl substituted for KCl in standard HEPES
buffer solution) and in the pipette solution containing: 100 mM CsCl,
10 mM NaCl, 20 mM tetraethylammonium chloride 20, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgATP, and 5 mM EGTA; pH was adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH. In some
experiments to simultaneously record ICa and cell
contraction, EGTA was omitted from the pipette solution and normal
HEPES buffer constituted the extracellular solution.
ICa was elicited by 300-ms pulses from a holding
potential of
40 mV to test potentials from
30 to +50 mV in 10-mV
increments at 0.1 Hz at 23°C. To monitor drug effects,
ICa elicited by a depolarization from
40 to 0 mV was continuously recorded. The amplitude of
ICa was measured as the difference between the
peak inward current and that at the end of 300-ms pulse. The decay of
ICa was fitted to a biexponential function:
|
f and
s
are the fast and slow inactivation time constants;
A0 is a constant; and Af
and As are amplitudes of fast and slow current
components, respectively.
To determine whether there is a current-voltage (I-V) shift, the
voltage-dependence of ICa steady-state activation
was calculated from the equation:
|
|
is the steady-state
activation, and V1/2 represents the half-maximal activation
voltage. k is the slope factor of the steady-state
activation curve.
Measurement of cAMP Accumulation.
Cardiac membranes were
prepared as previously described (Xiao et al., 1998
). cAMP levels were
assayed by the radioimmunoassay. Briefly, 10 µl of membrane vesicles
(20 µg total protein) was added to a 40-µl reaction mixture to make
a final concentration of 4 mM Tris-EDTA and 10 µM Ro 20-1724 (an
inhibitor of phosphodiesterase IV) with or without 0.5 µM ICI 118,551 (ICI is a
2AR inverse agonist). The
reaction was performed for 15 min at 37°C and 25 µl of supernatant
was assayed using a cAMP 3H assay kit obtained
from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Protein was measured using the
Bradford method (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) with BSA as the standard.
Materials. PTX, tetrodotoxin, forskolin, isoproterenol hydrochloride, norepinephrine (NE), prazosin, and Ro 20-1724 were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Rp diastereomers of 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP (Rp-CPT-cAMPS) was purchased from Biolog Life Science Institute (La Jolla, CA). cAMP assay kits were purchased from Amersham. Zinterol was kindly supplied by Bristol-Myers (Evansville, IN); ICI was kindly supplied by Imperial Chemical Industry (London, United Kingdom). CGP20712A (CGP) was kindly supplied by Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Basel, Switzerland).
Data Analysis. Data are reported as mean ± S.E.M. Student's t test was used to test for differences between TG4 and WT groups and for PTX-treated and nontreated groups; a paired t test was used for assessing the significance of drug effects. A value of P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the absence of exogenous
2AR agonists,
the basal cAMP level was increased by 2.5-fold in TG4 relative to WT
hearts (Fig. 1A). Concomitantly, basal
contraction amplitude was enhanced by 1.9-fold in single ventricular
myocytes isolated from TG4 mice (Fig. 1B). A
2AR inverse agonist, ICI (5 × 10
7 M), which had no significant effect on
either basal cAMP or contractility in WT mice, reduced the baseline
cAMP (Fig. 1A) and contractility of TG4 cells (Fig. 1B) to levels
similar to those of WT littermates. These data are in agreement with
previous observations that ICI depresses the elevated basal adenylyl
cyclase activity, heart rate and cardiac contractility in vivo and in
isolated atria (Milano et al., 1994
; Bond et al., 1995
; Du et al.,
1996
). Therefore, the results so far support the notion of spontaneous
2AR activation in the absence of an agonist
(Chidiac et al., 1994
; Milano et al., 1994
; Bond et al., 1995
; Xiao et
al., 1999
) and indicate that
2-R* augments
cAMP production and cardiac contractility, as is the case for
ligand-induced
2AR stimulation (Xiao and
Lakatta, 1993
; Xiao et al., 1994
, 1995
; Altschuld et al., 1995
; Zhou et al., 1997
). If
2-R* and
2-LR* were functionally equivalent, as predicted by the two-state model, the L-type
Ca2+ channel, a key target effector of
2-LR* signaling, would be modulated
by
2-R* in a similar fashion, i.e., baseline
ICa in TG4 cells would be expected to be
tonically elevated and sensitive to ICI. To our surprise, basal
ICa was not elevated in TG4 cells (see below).
Furthermore, although ICI (5 × 10
7 M)
rapidly and reversibly attenuated the augmented baseline contraction amplitude in TG4 ventricular myocytes (Fig.
2A), it had virtually no effect on the
amplitude (Fig. 2B; 97.2 ± 3.4% of control, n = 9) and time course (Fig. 2C) of ICa in TG4 cells.
This result was further confirmed by the simultaneous recording of
ICa and contraction using the EGTA-free pipette
solution. As shown in Fig. 3, ICI induced
a marked decrease in cell contraction amplitude without any change of
ICa in the same TG4 cell.
|
|
|
The differential effects of
2-R* on
ICa and contractility are in sharp contrast to
the traditional views that the L-type Ca2+
channel is an obligatory effector of
2AR
signaling (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993
; Cerbai et al., 1995
; Altschuld et
al., 1995
; Zhou et al., 1997
). The results also raise doubts as to
whether the
2-R* effect to augment
contractility in TG4 myocytes even requires the classical
cyclase-cAMP-PKA signaling. To directly address this issue, we used an
inhibitory cAMP analog, Rp-CPT-cAMPS, to specifically block PKA
activation. As shown in Fig. 3, similar to the effect of the inverse
agonist ICI, Rp-CPT-cAMPS reversed the
2-R*
effect on contraction without affecting the simultaneously recorded
ICa. This observation indicates that the
2-R*-stimulated inotropic effect in TG4 cells
depends largely on
2-R*-elicited cAMP
signaling, as does
2-LR* (Zhou et
al., 1997
; Skeberdis et al., 1997
; Xiao et al., 1999
). Thus, the
inability of
2-R* to modulate L-type
Ca2+ channels may be attributed to either a
qualitative difference between
2-R* and
2-LR*, or to an alteration in
L-type Ca2+ channels of TG4 cells (see below).
To further characterize the L-type Ca2+ channel
properties in TG4 cells, whole-cell ICa
amplitude, current-voltage relation, and inactivation kinetics were
systematically examined in both TG4 and WT ventricular myocytes. Figure
4A shows typical traces of
ICa elicited by a depolarization from
40 to 0 mV in a WT and a TG4 myocyte in the absence of any
2AR ligands. The baseline ICa in TG4 and WT cells are virtually
indistinguishable in amplitude and time course (Fig. 4A), consistent
with the absence of ICI-sensitive (
2-R*)
component of ICa described above. The average
amplitude of ICa at 0 mV was 1.01 ± 0.05 nA
in TG4 (n = 34) and 1.03 ± 0.07 nA in WT cells
(n = 38). Rundown of ICa was not
significantly different between these two groups (12.4 ± 4.9 and
14.1 ± 6.2% at 10 min for TG4 and WT cells, respectively;
n = 3 for both groups). Because there was no
significant difference in cell membrane capacitance (166 ± 10 pF,
n = 34, in TG4 cells versus 161 ± 12 pF,
n = 38, in WT cells), the density of
ICa (i.e., ICa normalized
by capacitance) was also similar in TG4 and WT groups (6.73 ± 0.43 pA/pF, n = 34 and 6.86 ± 0.49 pA/pF,
n = 38, respectively). The similarity in membrane
capacitance between TG4 and WT cells is consistent with a previous
report that no cellular hypertrophy occurs in 2- to 4-month-old TG4
hearts (Milano et al., 1994
; Xiao et al., 1999
).
|
Next, we determined the current-voltage relation of
ICa in both TG4 and WT myocytes. Cells were
depolarized from a holding potential of
40 mV to various test
potentials from
30 to +50 mV in 10-mV increments. Over the entire
voltage range examined, the ICa density-voltage
relations in TG4 and WT cells overlapped (Fig. 4B), indicating that
voltage-dependent activation of L-type Ca2+
channel in TG4 cells was unchanged as compared with WT controls. Furthermore, ICa inactivation time constants
(
f and
s) and the voltage-dependence of
f or
s of WT cells were similar to those of TG4
cells (Fig. 4C); likewise, there is no difference in the amplitude
proportion of the two exponential components between these two groups
(Af/As = 1.24 ± 0.08 at 0 mV, n = 20, in TG4 versus 1.19 ± 0.16, n = 19, in WT). Therefore, no measured parameters of
ICa, including amplitude, voltage-dependence, and
inactivation kinetics were altered by spontaneous
2AR activation in TG4 cardiac myocytes.
If L-type Ca2+ channels in TG4 cells were somehow
modified via compensatory mechanisms so that ICa
could no longer respond to
2-R*-mediated cAMP
signaling, the ICa response to any other cAMP signaling should be similarly blunted. However, forskolin, an activator
of adenylyl cyclase, induced a robust increase in the Cd2+-sensitive ICa in TG4
cells (Fig. 5, A and B). More
importantly, the dose-response curves of ICa to
forskolin in TG4 and WT cells virtually overlapped, with no significant
difference in EC50 (3.97 × 10
7 M for WT and 5.96 × 10
7 M for TG4; P > .05, Fig.
5C). Thus, the sensitivity of cardiac L-type Ca2+
channel to cAMP-PKA modulation remains intact in TG4 mice.
|
Our recent studies have shown that cardiac
2AR
couples to the PTX-sensitive inhibition proteins,
(Gi) Gi2 and
Gi3 (Xiao et al., 1995
, 1999
), and that this
coupling partially offsets the
2AR
agonist-mediated contractile response in rat myocytes (Xiao et al.,
1995
) and completely negates the
2AR
agonist-mediated contractile (Xiao et al., 1999
) and
ICa responses (Fig. 5, A and B) in TG4 and WT
murine ventricular myocytes. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that
an excessive Gi coupling to
2-R* could be involved in the inability of
2-R* to modulate ICa. To
test this hypothesis, baseline ICa was
re-examined in PTX-treated cells and compared with that in
PTX-untreated cells. Figure 6B shows that
in TG4 cells, PTX treatment had no significant effect on the baseline
ICa amplitude or its current-voltage relation.
Similar results were also obtained in WT cells (Fig. 6A). Moreover,
even in PTX-treated TG4 cells, neither the amplitude nor the kinetics of the basal ICa were affected by ICI (data not
shown). These results suggest that Gi proteins
are not involved in the unresponsiveness of ICa
to
2-R*.
|
Although Gi inhibition failed to rescue
ICa response to
2-R*, in
the same TG4 cells, PTX permitted
2-LR* induced by zinterol to
significantly enhance ICa (Fig. 6, C and D). The PTX rescued ICa response to
2-LR* in TG4 cells (149 ± 12% of control, at 0 mV, n = 8) was comparable with
that of WT cells (153 ± 11% of control, at 0 mV,
n = 4). In addition, the ICa-voltage relation was shifted leftward by
zinterol (V1/2 was
16.58 ± 1.33 and
23.03 ± 1.67 mV in the absence and presence of zinterol,
respectively, P = .01, Fig. 6C), in agreement with previous observations in rat ventricular myocytes (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993
). However, neither the inactivation kinetics
(
f, 101 ± 8% of control,
s, 108 ± 3% of control), nor the ratio
of Af/As (95 ± 19%
of control, n = 5) were significantly altered by
zinterol in PTX-treated TG4 cells. Figure 6D shows that the
ICa response to zinterol in a PTX-treated TG4
cell was completely blocked by the
2AR-selective antagonist, ICI at 5 × 10
7 M (96.2 ± 6.2% of control,
n = 5, P > .05 versus control). Thus, PTX treatment permits
2-LR*, but
not
2-R*, to modulate L-type
Ca2+ channel activity in TG4 heart.
Although in mouse cardiac myocytes
1-AR is
unable to couple to Gi proteins, as manifested by
the G protein photoaffinity labeling profile (Xiao et al., 1999
),
previous studies in guinea pig (Hool and Harvey, 1997
) raised doubt as
to whether the PTX rescued effect of zinterol is related to the
activation of
1AR. We therefore examined the
effect of
1AR stimulation in the presence and
absence of PTX treatment in TG4 myocytes. Interestingly,
1AR agonist NE even at maximal concentration
(NE 10
7 M) plus prazosin
10
6 M (Korzick et al., 1997
) did not induce a
discernible increase in ICa of TG4 cells, whereas
it markedly increased ICa in WT myocytes (Fig.
7, A and B). The absence of
ICa response to
1AR
stimulation is consistent with previous observations on the loss of
contractile response to
1AR stimulation by
either NE plus prazosin or isoproterenol plus the
2AR blocker, ICI (Bond et al., 1995
; Du et
al., 1996
). Whereas PTX treatment fully rescued the contractile (Xiao
et al., 1999
, also see Fig. 7C) and ICa (Fig. 6)
response to
2AR agonist stimulation, it was
unable to restore contractile and ICa response to
1AR stimulation (Fig. 7). In addition, in TG4
cells, the PTX-restored contractile response to a mixed
AR agonist,
isoproterenol 10
6 M, was specifically inhibited
by a
2AR antagonist, ICI
10
7 M, but not by a
1AR antagonist, CGP 3 × 10
7 M (Fig. 7C). This further corroborates our
previous notions that, unlike
2AR,
1AR does not couple to
Gi protein(s) in mouse myocardium (Xiao et al.,
1999
).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-R* Does Not Regulate ICa.
The
presence of
2-R* in the TG4 heart is evidenced
by the elevated basal adenylyl cyclase activity (Milano et al., 1994
) and cAMP production (Fig. 1A), the enhanced cardiac contractility (Milano et al., 1994
; Bond et al., 1995
; Du et al., 1996
; Rockman et
al., 1996
; Xiao et al., 1999
) (Fig. 1B), and the blockade of these
augmentations by the inverse
2AR agonist, ICI
(Milano et al., 1994
; Bond et al., 1995
; Du et al., 1996
; Xiao et al.,
1999
) (Figs. 2 and 3). In the present study, we have provided direct evidence that
2-R*-mediated modulation of
cardiac contractility is largely cAMP-PKA-dependent, because it is
sensitive to the PKA inhibitor Rp-CPT-cAMPS (Fig. 3). The most
surprising and unexpected finding of this study is that baseline
ICa in TG4 cardiac myocytes is not increased or
altered by
2-R* (Fig. 4). The simplest
explanation for this observation would be that
2-R*-directed signaling is totally diverted
from the L-type Ca2+ channels. However, the
interpretation for the results obtained from the transgenic model may
not be so straightforward, because compensatory changes have been
documented in TG4 hearts, e.g., down-regulation of the SR protein
phospholamban (PLB) (Rockman et al., 1996
) and up-regulation of
Gi proteins (R-P.X., unpublished data). Several
additional experiments have therefore been undertaken to explore
alternative possibilities.
2-R*, it could mask a
2-R*-mediated stimulatory effect on
ICa. In other words, an adaptive
"down-regulation" of ICa might offset an
increase in this current induced by
2-R*. This
possibility was tested by using the inverse
2AR agonist, ICI. Because ICI inactivates
2-R* and prevents spontaneous
2AR activation (Bond et al., 1995
2-R* effect. We have found that ICI has no
detectable effect on ICa, although it markedly reduces basal cell contractility and cAMP content (Figs. 1-3). Thus, our results do not support an adaptive reduction in L-type
Ca2+ channel number in TG4 mice.
A second possible explanation for the absence of enhancement of
ICa in TG4 cells is that L-type
Ca2+ channels might be somehow modified, thereby
losing their sensitivity to cAMP-dependent modulation. If this were the
case, ICa should no longer respond to any other
cAMP-dependent stimulation, or the responses should be markedly
attenuated. This possibility, however, have also been excluded on the
basis that agonist-elicited
2AR stimulation
enhances ICa (in PTX-treated TG4 myocytes) to an
extent similar to that in (PTX-treated) WT cells; and that the
ICa (in TG4 cells) dose-response curve to the
adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin overlaps with that in WT cells
(Fig. 5C), indicating that the responsiveness of L-type
Ca2+ channels to cAMP-PKA-dependent regulation in
TG4 cells is not significantly altered. Thus, the unresponsiveness of
ICa to
2-R* is not
caused by the changes in the channel proteins.
In mammalian hearts, agonist-elicited
2AR
stimulation evokes bifurcated Gs- and
Gi-mediated signaling cascades: the
2AR-Gi pathway exerts a
negative feedback control of the
2AR-Gs effects (Xiao et
al., 1995
2-LR* to L-type
Ca2+ channel in non-PTX-treated WT and TG4 cells,
because PTX unmasks a de novo ICa response to
2AR agonist zinterol (Fig. 6, C and D), and
the
2AR agonist zinterol enhances the
photoaffinity labeling of the
subunits of the
Gi proteins, Gi2 and
Gi3 (Xiao et al., 1999
2-R* to augment
ICa in TG4 cells, because PTX fails to potentiate basal ICa(Fig. 6B), and ICI has no effect on the
baseline ICa regardless of PTX (Figs. 2 and 3).
These functional results suggest that
2-R*
does not couple to Gi proteins as efficiently as
does
2-LR*. This is in good
agreement with the fact that in transgenic mice with high or medium
levels of
2AR overexpression,
2AR in the absence of an agonist,
coprecipitates with Gs but barely with
Gi/Go (Gurdal et al.,
1997
2AR activation in TG4 cells, whereas
increasing cell contractility, does not regulate
ICa, a key effector of
2-LR*.
Differences between
2-R*- and
2-LR*-Mediated Signaling.
In contrast to the
prediction of the two-state receptor model, the differential regulation
of ICa by
2-R* and
2-LR* suggests that the liganded
and unliganded active
2ARs are different active receptor species, likely having different conformations and
initiating distinct postreceptor signaling pathways. Several lines of
additional evidence support this hypothesis. First of all, whereas
2-R* in TG4 heart significantly increases the
baseline contractility,
2-LR*
induced by zinterol or isoproterenol at maximal concentrations are
unable to further increase contraction amplitude (Milano et al., 1994
;
Du et al., 1996
; Xiao et al., 1999
), even though the basal
contractility is not at the maximum contractile state yet (Du et al.,
1996
; Xiao et al., 1999
). Secondly,
2-R*,
unlike
2-LR*, does not couple to
Gi proteins, as reflected by the lack of a PTX
effect on the basal ICa (Fig. 6) and by
immunoprecipitation data on receptor-G protein interaction (Gurdal et
al., 1997
). Finally, it has recently been shown that in rat and mouse
cardiac myocytes, multiple active conformational states of
2AR can be induced by different
2AR ligands (R-P.X., unpublished data).
Similar observations have been reported previously for
2AR and other G protein-coupled receptors in
transfected cells (e.g., Eason et al., 1994
) or artificial lipid
vesicles (Gether et al., 1997
). The present finding that
2-R* differs from
2-LR* is in general agreement with
the emerging concept of multiple active receptor states for a given receptor.
2-R* and
2-LR* is manifested by their
chronic noncontractile effect. Agonist-induced, chronic, mixed
AR or
2AR stimulation has been shown to enhance cardiac cell growth in vitro (Boluyt et al., 1995
2-R*, as demonstrated here, may be of
particular relevance to the lack of cardiac hypertrophy and
cardiomyopathy in the TG4 model.
The present results also illustrate that, although both
2-LR* (Xiao et al., 1999
2-R* (Fig. 3) couple to cAMP-dependent signal
transduction pathway, their cAMP signaling may be differentially compartmentalized. Specifically, the cyclase activity or cAMP-PKA signal due to
2-R* must be somehow shielded
from L-type Ca2+ channels, but is readily
accessible to other E-C coupling machineries. In contrast to
2-R*, previous studies in many species (rat,
mouse, and dog) have shown that, L-type Ca2+
channel is the major target protein of
2-LR*, whereas the SR and other
cytosolic proteins do not always respond to
2-LR*-stimulated cAMP-PKA signaling
(Xiao et al., 1994
2-R* differs
qualitatively from
2-LR*; this
difference might not be simply explained by different coupling
efficiency to various targets. Taken together, not only the receptor
type or subtype (e.g., Zhou et al., 1997
2-LR*-Gi
signaling pathway can fully antagonize the
2-LR*-Gs-
cAMP-mediated effects in the bulk cytosolic compartment (Xiao et
al., 1994
2-LR*-Gi
signaling dominates, negating
2-LR*-Gs effects in both sarcolemmal and cytosolic compartments (Xiao et al.,
1999
2-LR*-Gs-cAMP signal. However, the same mechanism cannot explain the inability of
2-R* to modulate the L-type
Ca2+ channel because there is little
2-R*-Gi coupling (Gurdal
et al., 1997
2-R* versus
2-LR*. For example,
2-R* and
2-LR* could couple to different
isoforms of Gs (Seifert et al., 1998
2-R* or
2-LR* stimulation. The exact
mechanism underlying the inability of
2-R*-cAMP signaling to regulate
ICa remains to be elucidated in future studies.
Possible Mechanism for
2-R* to Augment Cardiac
Contractility.
Cardiac contractility is an integrated parameter
determined by several effectors involved in the E-C coupling cascade.
Although ICa is unaffected by
2-R*, the increase in the adenylyl cyclase activity and cAMP production may modulate the E-C coupling cascade by
PKA-dependent phosphorylation of target proteins downstream of L-type
Ca2+ channels, e.g., the SR
Ca2+ release channels, SR membrane protein PLB,
and some contractile proteins. Indeed, our preliminary observations
have shown that in TG4 ventricular myocytes, the frequency of
"Ca2+ sparks" (i.e., the elementary SR
Ca2+ release events) and the amplitude of whole
cell Ca2+ transients are markedly increased in
TG4 cells, and that both are sensitive to ICI. In addition, there is an
adaptive down-regulation of PLB expression in TG4 hearts (Rockman et
al., 1996
) and thereby less basal inhibition of the SR
Ca2+ pump in cardiac cells from these transgenic
animals. Thus, the enhanced SR Ca2+ recycling may
be sufficient to account for the augmentation of baseline contractility
in TG4 heart. Regardless of the specific mechanism, the suppression of
the enhanced basal contractility by Rp-CPT-cAMPS (Fig. 3) indicates
that the
2-R*-elicited contractile effect is
largely cAMP/PKA dependent.
Loss of
1AR Function Associated with
2AR Overexpression.
Although both
1AR and
2AR coexist
in mouse ventricular myocyte, the function of
1AR is undetectable in
2AR overexpression transgenic (TG4) murine
heart, as shown by the absence of ICa (Fig. 7, A
and B) or contractile response (Fig. 7C; also see Bond et al., 1995
; Du
et al., 1996
) to
1AR stimulation by either NE plus prazosin or isoproterenol plus the
2AR
blocker, ICI. In contrast, in WT mouse ventricular myocyte,
1AR stimulation produced a dose-dependent
increase in contraction amplitude (Korzick et al., 1997
) and
ICa (Fig. 7, A and B). In TG4 myocytes, PTX
treatment only rescues the contractile and ICa
responses to
2AR agonists, but not to
1AR agonists (Fig. 7; also see Xiao et al.,
1999
). Although the exact mechanism for the loss of
1AR function in TG4 heart is unknown, this
phenotype seems to be linked to the overexpression of
2AR, because the
1AR
function also disappeared in rat C6 glioma cells
overexpressed
2AR (Zhong et al., 1996
). These
results indicate a complex interaction between
AR subtypes (Zhong et
al., 1996
).
2-AR Stimulation in TG4 Hearts at Different
Ages.
Recent studies have shown that ICa
density is increased in embryonic/neonatal TG4 myocytes (An et al.,
1999
), but decreased in 3- to 8-month old TG4 mouse heart cells
(Heubach et al., 1999
) as compared with age-matched controls. In the
present study, we found no evidence for any difference in
ICa characteristics between transgenic and WT
cells from young adult animals (2-3 months old). This apparent
discrepancy may reflect an age-related change in
AR signaling
cascade. In nontransgenic rat, there are striking developmental changes
with respect to
2AR agonist sensitivity and
functions (Kuznetsov et al., 1995
, Xiao et al., 1998
), perhaps due to a
developmental changes in
2AR-Gi coupling. In this
scenario, it is not surprising that spontaneous
2AR activation may exhibit differential
functions at different stages of development. Alternatively, it is
possible that some compensatory changes (e.g., expression of L-type
Ca2+ channel) may occur progressively as a result
of the receptor overexpression, rendering divergent and even
conflicting phenotypes at different ages. Nevertheless, as discussed
above, a compensatory change in Ca2+ channel
sensitivity to cAMP-PKA signaling cannot account for the inability of
2-R*s to regulate ICa in
the young mouse heart.
2-R*s in TG4
cardiac myocytes is highly compartmentalized and target
protein-specific. In embryonic/neonatal TG4 cells,
2-R*s augment ICa but
not cAMP-sensitive potassium currents (IK) (An et
al., 1999
2ARs, in contrast to the ligand-activated
2ARs, do not regulate the L-type
Ca2+ channel, despite the fact that both
2-R* and
2-LR* can increase cAMP and
contractility. However, salient properties of L-type channels in TG4
cells are unaltered and ICa response to
2-LR* (in PTX-treated cells) or
forskolin remains intact. These results suggest that
2-R* may differ from
2-LR*, and thereby the two-state
receptor model apparently needs to be expanded to accommodate
additional active receptor species. These novel findings of the present
study also raise many important unsolved questions. 1) What is the
mechanism controlling the sorting of intracellular signals en route
from the same receptor at different active states? 2) What are the
effectors via which
2-R* produce a positive
inotropic effect? 3) Why are L-type Ca2+ channels
inaccessible to
2-R*-stimulated cAMP yet
receptive to
2-LR*- and adenylyl
cyclase-elicited cAMP signaling? 4) What is the mechanism underlying
the development- and age-associated differences in
2-AR signaling? Future studies are required to further understand these detailed aspects of
2-R* and
2-LR* signaling.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Drs. Walter J. Koch and Robert J. Lefkowitz for kindly
providing the
2AR overexpression transgenic
(TG4) mice, and Dr. Harold A. Spurgeon and Bruce Ziman for their
excellent technical support.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 1, 1999; Accepted May 14, 1999
Send reprint requests to: Rui-Ping Xiao, M.D., Ph.D., Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5600 Nathan Shock Dr., Baltimore, MD 21224. E-mail: xiaor{at}grc.nia.nih.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AR,
-adrenergic
receptor,
-R*, spontaneously activated
AR;
-LR*, ligand activated
AR;
CGP, CGP20712A;
E-C, excitation-contraction;
Gi and Gs, inhibitory
and stimulatory G protein(s), respectively;
ICa, L-type
Ca2+ current;
ICI, ICI118,551;
NE, norepinephrine;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A;
PLB, phospholamban;
PTX, pertussis
toxin;
R and R*, inactive and active receptor conformational states,
respectively;
Rp-CPT-cAMPS, Rp diastereomers of
8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP;
SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum;
TG4 mice, transgenic mice overexpressing human
2AR;
WT mice, wild-type mice..
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic stimulation.
Circulation
92:
1612-1618
2-adrenergic receptor overexpression in the developing mouse heart: Evidence for targeted modulation of ion channels.
J Physiol (Lond)
516:
19-30
2-adrenoceptor.
Nature (Lond)
374:
272-276[Medline].
-adrenoceptor subtypes in young and old rat ventricular myocytes: A combined patch-clamp and binding study.
Br J Pharmacol
116:
1835-1842[Medline].
-adrenergic antagonists.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
490-499[Abstract].
2-adrenergic receptor.
Am J Physiol
271:
H630-H636
2-adrenergic receptor subtype coupling to Gs.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
696-702[Abstract].
2 adrenoceptor.
EMBO J
16:
6737-6747[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor on ligand affinity in transgenic mice.
Mol Pharmacol
52:
187-194
I,
Wettwer E,
Himmel HM,
Michel MC,
Kaumann AJ,
Koch WJ,
Harding SE and
Ravens U
(1999)
L-type calcium current and contractility in ventricular myocytes from mice overexpressing the cardiac
2-adrenoceptor.
Cardiovasc Res
42:
173-182
1- and
2-adrenergic receptors in regulation of Cl- and Ca2+ channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.
Am J Physiol
273:
H1669-H676
overexpression.
Circ Res
78:
517-524
-adrenergic agonists.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
295-299
-adrenergic receptor kinase modifies cardiac myocyte contraction to norepinephrine.
Am J Physiol
272:
H590-H596
-adrenergic receptor stimulation in mice.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
2735-2746[Medline].
2-adrenergic signaling.
J Biol Chem
274:
22048-22052
2-adrenergic cAMP signaling is uncoupled from phosphorylation of cytoplasmic proteins in canine heart.
Circulation
99:
2458-2465
2-adrenergic receptor actions in neonatal and adult rat ventricular myocytes.
Circ Res
76:
40-52
2-adrenergic receptor.
Science
264:
582-586
2-adrenergic receptor is associated with reduced phospholamban protein.
J Clin Invest
97:
1618-1623[Medline].
splice variants on
2-adrenoreceptor-mediated signaling. The
2-adrenoreceptor coupled to the long splice variant of Gs
has properties of a constitutively active receptor.
J Biol Chem
273:
5109-5116
2 adrenergic activation of L-type Ca2+ current in cardiac myocytes.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
283:
452-461
2-adrenoceptor to Gi proteins and its physiological relevance in murine cardiac myocytes.
Circ Res
84:
43-52
2-adrenergic receptor-stimulated increase in cAMP in rat heart cells is not coupled to changes in Ca2+ dynamics, contractility, or phospholamban phosphorylation.
J Biol Chem
269:
19151-19156
2-adrenoceptor to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein in cardiac myocytes.
Mol Pharmacol
47:
322-329[Abstract].
1-adrenoceptor stimulation and
2-adrenoceptor stimulation differ in their effects on contraction, cytosolic Ca2+, and Ca2+ current in single rat ventricular cells.
Circ Res
73:
286-300
1- and
2-adrenergic responses without changes in inhibitory G proteins or receptor kinases.
J Clin Invest
101:
1273-1282[Medline].
-adrenergic modulation of cardiac calcium channel currents by a fast G protein pathway.
Science
245:
71-74
1- and
2-adrenergic receptors in rat C6 glioma cells: Functional interaction between closely related subtypes.
Mol Pharmacol
50:
175-184[Abstract].
2-adrenoceptor stimulation on adult ventricular cardiomyocytes.
Mol Cell Biochem
163-164:
211-216.
2-adrenergic modulation of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling.
Am J Physiol
273:
H1611-H1618This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Engelhardt and F. Rochais G Proteins: More Than Transducers of Receptor-Generated Signals? Circ. Res., April 27, 2007; 100(8): 1109 - 1111. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Grandy, E. M. Denovan-Wright, G. R. Ferrier, and S. E. Howlett Overexpression of human {beta}2-adrenergic receptors increases gain of excitation-contraction coupling in mouse ventricular myocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1029 - H1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Chakir, Y. Xiang, D. Yang, S.-J. Zhang, H. Cheng, B. K. Kobilka, and R.-P. Xiao The Third Intracellular Loop and the Carboxyl Terminus of {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Confer Spontaneous Activity of the Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2003; 64(5): 1048 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-P. Xiao, S.-J. Zhang, K. Chakir, P. Avdonin, W. Zhu, R. A. Bond, C. W. Balke, E. G. Lakatta, and H. Cheng Enhanced Gi Signaling Selectively Negates {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor (AR)- but Not {beta}1-AR-Mediated Positive Inotropic Effect in Myocytes From Failing Rat Hearts Circulation, September 30, 2003; 108(13): 1633 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jurevicius, V A. Skeberdis, and R. Fischmeister Role of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoforms in cAMP compartmentation following {beta}2-adrenergic stimulation of ICa,L in frog ventricular myocytes J. Physiol., August 15, 2003; 551(1): 239 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bartel, E.-G. Krause, G. Wallukat, and P. Karczewski New insights into {beta}2-adrenoceptor signaling in the adult rat heart Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2003; 57(3): 694 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Cesetti, J. M. Hernandez-Guijo, P. Baldelli, V. Carabelli, and E. Carbone Opposite Action of beta 1- and beta 2-Adrenergic Receptors on CaV1 L-Channel Current in Rat Adrenal Chromaffin Cells J. Neurosci., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 73 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Port and M. R. Bristow beta -Adrenergic Receptors, Transgenic Mice, and Pharmacological Model Systems Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 629 - 631. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Engelhardt, Y. Grimmer, G.-H. Fan, and M. J. Lohse Constitutive Activity of the Human beta 1-Adrenergic Receptor in beta 1-Receptor Transgenic Mice Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 712 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Seifert, K. Wenzel-Seifert, U. Gether, and B. K. Kobilka Functional Differences between Full and Partial Agonists: Evidence for Ligand-Specific Receptor Conformations J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2001; 297(3): 1218 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Zhou and M. Artman Nucleoside diphosphate kinase: a new player in heart failure? Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2001; 49(1): 7 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Zhou, D. Yang, W.-Z. Zhu, S.-J. Zhang, D.-J. Wang, D. K. Rohrer, E. Devic, B. K. Kobilka, E. G. Lakatta, H. Cheng, et al. Spontaneous Activation of beta 2- but Not beta 1-Adrenoceptors Expressed in Cardiac Myocytes from beta 1beta 2 Double Knockout Mice Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2000; 58(5): 887 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Zhou, S.-Q. Wang, W.-Z. Zhu, A. Chruscinski, B. K. Kobilka, B. Ziman, S. Wang, E. G. Lakatta, H. Cheng, and R.-P. Xiao Culture and adenoviral infection of adult mouse cardiac myocytes: methods for cellular genetic physiology Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2000; 279(1): H429 - H436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Zhou, L.-S. Song, E. G Lakatta, R.-P. Xiao, and H. Cheng Constitutive {beta}2-adrenergic signalling enhances sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ cycling to augment contraction in mouse heart J. Physiol., December 1, 1999; 521(2): 351 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-P. Xiao, H. Cheng, Y.-Y. Zhou, M. Kuschel, and E. G. Lakatta Recent Advances in Cardiac {beta}2-Adrenergic Signal Transduction Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1092 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Zhang, H. Cheng, Y.-Y. Zhou, D.-J. Wang, W. Zhu, B. Ziman, H. Spurgoen, R. J. Lefkowitz, E. G. Lakatta, W. J. Koch, et al. Inhibition of Spontaneous beta 2-Adrenergic Activation Rescues beta 1-Adrenergic Contractile Response in Cardiomyocytes Overexpressing beta 2-Adrenoceptor J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2000; 275(28): 21773 - 21779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||