MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, Y.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, R.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, Y.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, R.-P.

Vol. 56, Issue 3, 485-493, September 1999

Spontaneous beta 2-Adrenergic Signaling Fails To Modulate L-Type Ca2+ Current in Mouse Ventricular Myocytes

Ying-Ying Zhou, Heping Cheng, Long-Sheng Song, Dingji Wang, Edward G. Lakatta, and Rui-Ping Xiao

Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland

    Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

A receptor can be activated either by specific ligand-directed changes in conformation or by intrinsic, spontaneous conformational change. In the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (AR) overexpression transgenic (TG4) murine heart, spontaneously activated beta 2AR (beta 2-R*) in the absence of ligands has been evidenced by elevated basal adenylyl cyclase activity and cardiac function. In the present study, we determined whether the signaling mediated by beta 2-R* differs from that of a ligand-elicited beta 2AR activation (beta 2-LR*). In ventricular myocytes from TG4 mice, the properties of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa), a major effector of beta 2-LR* signaling, was unaltered, despite a 2.5-fold increase in the basal cAMP level and a 1.9-fold increase in baseline contraction amplitude as compared with that of wild-type (WT) cells. Although the contractile response to beta 2-R* in TG4 cells was abolished by a beta 2AR inverse agonist, ICI118,551 (5 × 10-7 M), or an inhibitory cAMP analog, Rp-CPT-cAMPS (10-4 M), no change was detected in the simultaneously recorded ICa. These results suggest that the increase in basal cAMP due to beta 2-R*, while increasing contraction amplitude, does not affect ICa characteristics. In contrast, the beta 2AR agonist, zinterol elicited a substantial augmentation of ICa in both TG4 and WT cells (pertussis toxin-treated), indicating that L-type Ca2+ channel in these cells can respond to ligand-directed signaling. Furthermore, forskolin, an adenylyl cyclase activator, elicited similar dose-dependent increase in ICa amplitude in WT and TG4 cells, suggesting that the sensitivity of L-type Ca2+ channel to cAMP-dependent modulation remains intact in TG4 cells. Thus, we conclude that beta 2-R* bypasses ICa to modulate contraction, and that beta 2-LR* and beta 2-R* exhibit different intracellular signaling and target protein specificity.

    Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

beta -adrenergic receptor (AR) stimulation plays a prominent role in modulation of cardiac myocyte performance in response to an increased peripheral demand. Driven by sympathetic neurotransmitters and adrenal hormones, beta AR activation regulates virtually all major steps of the cardiac cell excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling cascade, e.g., the sarcolemmal L-type Ca2+ current (ICa), sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release and reuptake, and the responsiveness of contractile myofilaments to cytosolic Ca2+. Because ICa provides the trigger for SR Ca2+ release, and is a major determinant of intracellular calcium homeostasis, modulation of this current by beta AR system has been extensively studied over the last two decades. It has been demonstrated that both beta 1AR and beta 2AR subtypes coexist in cardiac myocytes in many mammalian species, and that stimulation of each of these receptor subtypes increases cardiac ICa (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993; Cerbai et al., 1995) through the classic stimulatory G protein (Gs)-adenylyl cyclase-cAMP-protein kinase A (PKA) signaling cascade (Hartzell et al., 1991; Zhou et al., 1997; Skeberdis et al., 1997; Xiao et al., 1999). The existence and functional importance of a more rapid, direct interaction of the beta AR-activated Gs and L-type Ca2+ channel remain controversial (Yatani and Brown, 1989; Hartzell et al., 1991; Zhou et al., 1997; Skeberdis et al., 1997).

A prevailing receptor theory (two-state model) states that a G protein-coupled receptor, such as beta 1AR or beta 2AR, exists in an equilibrium between two conformational states: an inactive (R) state and an active (R*) state, the latter having high affinity for G proteins (Bond et al., 1995). In the absence of a receptor agonist, spontaneous transition between the R* and R states results in a constitutive or intrinsic activation of only minority of receptors (Chidiac et al., 1994; Bond et al., 1995) and thus the functional significance of R* is not always evident. The presence of a large number of spontaneously activated beta 2ARs (beta 2-R*s), which alter basal function, has been experimentally demonstrated in a transgenic (TG) murine model, the TG4 mouse (Milano et al., 1994; Bond et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 1999), in which the human beta 2AR is overexpressed by ~200-fold in a cardiac-specific manner. Hence, this transgenic model provides a unique opportunity to study the transmembrane signal transduction originating from unliganded beta 2-R* in comparison with that from the ligand-activated beta 2AR (beta 2-LR*). According to the two-state receptor model, beta 2-R* ought to be identical with beta 2-LR*, because there is only a single active conformational state. However, there is no a priori reason that this has to be the case. By analogy to ionic channels and enzymes, it is more plausible that a receptor may possess multiple, distinct active conformations (Perez et al., 1996; Gurdal et al., 1997). If beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* differ in their active conformational states, spontaneous and agonist-induced beta 2-adrenergic signaling may not be functionally equivalent, e.g., in modulating their target proteins, such as L-type Ca2+ channels.

In the present study, we examined the possible modulatory effects of beta 2-R* on basal ICa and cell contraction in single ventricular myocytes and on basal cAMP in myocardium from TG4 mice and wild-type (WT) littermates. Surprisingly, we found no evidence that ICa was regulated by beta 2-R* in TG4 heart cells. In contrast, both beta 2-LR* signaling in the presence of pertussis toxin (PTX) and direct adenylyl cyclase activation by forskolin augmented ICa to an extent similar to that observed in WT cells. Our results support the idea that despite many similarities, beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* may represent distinct functional conformation states of the receptor, eliciting different intracellular signaling patterns, and having differential effects on target proteins. These findings require an extension of the current model of beta 2AR to encompass multiple active conformational states.

    Experimental Procedures
Top
Summary
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Isolation and Measurement of Contraction. Single murine cardiac myocytes were isolated from the hearts of 2- to 3- month-old mice via a standard enzymatic technique (Korzick et al., 1997). Briefly, hearts were retrogradely perfused with collagenase B and protease using the Langendorff method. Cells were shaken loose from the heart after this perfusion and then suspended in HEPES buffer solution consisting of: 1 mM CaCl2, 137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 15 mM dextrose, 1.3 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, adjusted with NaOH. Ca2+ tolerant cells were kept at 37°C, with or without incubation with 1.5 µg/ml PTX for at least 3 h, as described previously (Xiao et al., 1995).

Cells were placed on the stage of an inverted microscope (Zeiss, model IM-35; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) and superfused with HEPES-buffered solution at a flow rate of 1.8 ml/min. Each cell was illuminated with red (650-750 nm) light through the normal brightfield path of the microscope and field stimulated at 0.5 Hz at 23°C. Cell length was monitored from the brightfield image by an optical edge tracking method using a photodiode array (model 1024 SAQ;, Reticon) with a 3-ms time resolution (Spurgeon et al., 1990).

Criteria for viable mouse myocytes have been described in a previous report (Korzick et al., 1997), i.e., 1) rod shape; 2) clearly defined sarcomeric striations; 3) a clear negative staircase after rest for a period of ~1 min; and 4) a stable steady-state contraction amplitude for at least 5 min before drug administration.

Ca2+ Current Measurement. ICa was measured via the whole-cell patch clamp technique using an Axopatch 1D amplifier (Axon Instruments Inc., Foster City, CA). Low-resistance (1-2 MOmega ) micropipettes were pulled via a two-stage micropipette puller (model P-97; Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA). The average series resistance (Rs) in whole-cell configuration was 5.71 ± 0.28 MOmega for TG4 cells (n = 34) and 5.99 ± 0.39 MOmega for WT cells (n = 25), and routinely compensated ~70% in our experiments. To selectively examine ICa, cells were voltage-clamped at -40 mV to inactivate the sodium and T-type Ca2+ channels. Potassium currents were inhibited by appropriate blockers in the extracellular HEPES buffer solution (4 mM 4-aminopyridine, 5.4 mM CsCl substituted for KCl in standard HEPES buffer solution) and in the pipette solution containing: 100 mM CsCl, 10 mM NaCl, 20 mM tetraethylammonium chloride 20, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgATP, and 5 mM EGTA; pH was adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH. In some experiments to simultaneously record ICa and cell contraction, EGTA was omitted from the pipette solution and normal HEPES buffer constituted the extracellular solution. ICa was elicited by 300-ms pulses from a holding potential of -40 mV to test potentials from -30 to +50 mV in 10-mV increments at 0.1 Hz at 23°C. To monitor drug effects, ICa elicited by a depolarization from -40 to 0 mV was continuously recorded. The amplitude of ICa was measured as the difference between the peak inward current and that at the end of 300-ms pulse. The decay of ICa was fitted to a biexponential function:
<UP>I<SUB>Ca</SUB></UP>=<UP>A</UP><SUB>0</SUB>+<UP>A<SUB>f</SUB>exp</UP>(<UP>−t/&tgr;</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>)+<UP>A<SUB>s</SUB>exp</UP>(<UP>−t/&tgr;</UP><SUB><UP>s</UP></SUB>)
Where tau f and tau s are the fast and slow inactivation time constants; A0 is a constant; and Af and As are amplitudes of fast and slow current components, respectively.

To determine whether there is a current-voltage (I-V) shift, the voltage-dependence of ICa steady-state activation was calculated from the equation:
g=<UP>I/</UP>(<UP>E<SUB>m</SUB></UP>−<UP>E</UP><SUB><UP>rev</UP></SUB>)
where g is the membrane conductance, I is the peak current at a given test potential (Em), and Erev is the apparent reversal potential for ICa (+60 mV). The conductance at each test potential was then normalized to peak conductance. The data were fit by a Boltzmann equation:
d<SUB>∞</SUB>={1+<UP>exp</UP>[<UP>−</UP>(<UP>V<SUB>m</SUB></UP>−<UP>V</UP><SUB>1/2</SUB>)/k]}<SUP><UP>−</UP>1</SUP>
where dinfinity is the steady-state activation, and V1/2 represents the half-maximal activation voltage. k is the slope factor of the steady-state activation curve.

Measurement of cAMP Accumulation. Cardiac membranes were prepared as previously described (Xiao et al., 1998). cAMP levels were assayed by the radioimmunoassay. Briefly, 10 µl of membrane vesicles (20 µg total protein) was added to a 40-µl reaction mixture to make a final concentration of 4 mM Tris-EDTA and 10 µM Ro 20-1724 (an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase IV) with or without 0.5 µM ICI 118,551 (ICI is a beta 2AR inverse agonist). The reaction was performed for 15 min at 37°C and 25 µl of supernatant was assayed using a cAMP 3H assay kit obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Protein was measured using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) with BSA as the standard.

Materials. PTX, tetrodotoxin, forskolin, isoproterenol hydrochloride, norepinephrine (NE), prazosin, and Ro 20-1724 were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Rp diastereomers of 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP (Rp-CPT-cAMPS) was purchased from Biolog Life Science Institute (La Jolla, CA). cAMP assay kits were purchased from Amersham. Zinterol was kindly supplied by Bristol-Myers (Evansville, IN); ICI was kindly supplied by Imperial Chemical Industry (London, United Kingdom). CGP20712A (CGP) was kindly supplied by Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Basel, Switzerland).

Data Analysis. Data are reported as mean ± S.E.M. Student's t test was used to test for differences between TG4 and WT groups and for PTX-treated and nontreated groups; a paired t test was used for assessing the significance of drug effects. A value of P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.

    Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

In the absence of exogenous beta 2AR agonists, the basal cAMP level was increased by 2.5-fold in TG4 relative to WT hearts (Fig. 1A). Concomitantly, basal contraction amplitude was enhanced by 1.9-fold in single ventricular myocytes isolated from TG4 mice (Fig. 1B). A beta 2AR inverse agonist, ICI (5 × 10-7 M), which had no significant effect on either basal cAMP or contractility in WT mice, reduced the baseline cAMP (Fig. 1A) and contractility of TG4 cells (Fig. 1B) to levels similar to those of WT littermates. These data are in agreement with previous observations that ICI depresses the elevated basal adenylyl cyclase activity, heart rate and cardiac contractility in vivo and in isolated atria (Milano et al., 1994; Bond et al., 1995; Du et al., 1996). Therefore, the results so far support the notion of spontaneous beta 2AR activation in the absence of an agonist (Chidiac et al., 1994; Milano et al., 1994; Bond et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 1999) and indicate that beta 2-R* augments cAMP production and cardiac contractility, as is the case for ligand-induced beta 2AR stimulation (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993; Xiao et al., 1994, 1995; Altschuld et al., 1995; Zhou et al., 1997). If beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* were functionally equivalent, as predicted by the two-state model, the L-type Ca2+ channel, a key target effector of beta 2-LR* signaling, would be modulated by beta 2-R* in a similar fashion, i.e., baseline ICa in TG4 cells would be expected to be tonically elevated and sensitive to ICI. To our surprise, basal ICa was not elevated in TG4 cells (see below). Furthermore, although ICI (5 × 10-7 M) rapidly and reversibly attenuated the augmented baseline contraction amplitude in TG4 ventricular myocytes (Fig. 2A), it had virtually no effect on the amplitude (Fig. 2B; 97.2 ± 3.4% of control, n = 9) and time course (Fig. 2C) of ICa in TG4 cells. This result was further confirmed by the simultaneous recording of ICa and contraction using the EGTA-free pipette solution. As shown in Fig. 3, ICI induced a marked decrease in cell contraction amplitude without any change of ICa in the same TG4 cell.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Comparison of the basal cAMP (A) and contractility (B) in the beta 2AR TG4 mice and in WT mice. Both basal cAMP and contraction amplitude are significantly increased in TG4 as compared with that of WT mice, and both increases can be reversed by a beta 2AR inverse agonist, ICI 118,551 (ICI, 5 × 10-7 M); n = 3 for cAMP measurements; n = 12 and 9 for contraction measurements in WT and TG4 cells, respectively. *P < .01 for TG4 without ICI group compared with other groups.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A beta 2AR inverse agonist, ICI (5 × 10-7 M), depresses the basal contraction but not ICa in TG4 cardiomyocytes. A, an example of the effect of ICI on basal contraction amplitude. Top, a continuous chart recording of cell length. An upward deflection indicates cell shortening. Bottom, the twitch is displayed at higher resolution at times indicated in top panel. A downward deflection indicates cell shortening. B, typical continuous recording of ICa in response to ICI. ICa is elicited every 30 s by 300-ms pulses from -40 to 0 mV. C, superimposed traces of ICa recorded before and after exposure to ICI at times indicated in B.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A typical example of simultaneous recording of TG4 cell contraction and ICa in response to the beta 2AR inverse agonist, ICI (5 × 10-7 M) or a PKA inhibitor, Rp-CPT-cAMPS (10-4 M) under the whole-cell voltage clamp condition without EGTA in the pipette. The voltage clamp protocol is shown as the inset. Shortening of cell length is shown in the upper panel and ICa in the lower panel. Similar results were obtained in three other cells.

The differential effects of beta 2-R* on ICa and contractility are in sharp contrast to the traditional views that the L-type Ca2+ channel is an obligatory effector of beta 2AR signaling (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993; Cerbai et al., 1995; Altschuld et al., 1995; Zhou et al., 1997). The results also raise doubts as to whether the beta 2-R* effect to augment contractility in TG4 myocytes even requires the classical cyclase-cAMP-PKA signaling. To directly address this issue, we used an inhibitory cAMP analog, Rp-CPT-cAMPS, to specifically block PKA activation. As shown in Fig. 3, similar to the effect of the inverse agonist ICI, Rp-CPT-cAMPS reversed the beta 2-R* effect on contraction without affecting the simultaneously recorded ICa. This observation indicates that the beta 2-R*-stimulated inotropic effect in TG4 cells depends largely on beta 2-R*-elicited cAMP signaling, as does beta 2-LR* (Zhou et al., 1997; Skeberdis et al., 1997; Xiao et al., 1999). Thus, the inability of beta 2-R* to modulate L-type Ca2+ channels may be attributed to either a qualitative difference between beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR*, or to an alteration in L-type Ca2+ channels of TG4 cells (see below).

To further characterize the L-type Ca2+ channel properties in TG4 cells, whole-cell ICa amplitude, current-voltage relation, and inactivation kinetics were systematically examined in both TG4 and WT ventricular myocytes. Figure 4A shows typical traces of ICa elicited by a depolarization from -40 to 0 mV in a WT and a TG4 myocyte in the absence of any beta 2AR ligands. The baseline ICa in TG4 and WT cells are virtually indistinguishable in amplitude and time course (Fig. 4A), consistent with the absence of ICI-sensitive (beta 2-R*) component of ICa described above. The average amplitude of ICa at 0 mV was 1.01 ± 0.05 nA in TG4 (n = 34) and 1.03 ± 0.07 nA in WT cells (n = 38). Rundown of ICa was not significantly different between these two groups (12.4 ± 4.9 and 14.1 ± 6.2% at 10 min for TG4 and WT cells, respectively; n = 3 for both groups). Because there was no significant difference in cell membrane capacitance (166 ± 10 pF, n = 34, in TG4 cells versus 161 ± 12 pF, n = 38, in WT cells), the density of ICa (i.e., ICa normalized by capacitance) was also similar in TG4 and WT groups (6.73 ± 0.43 pA/pF, n = 34 and 6.86 ± 0.49 pA/pF, n = 38, respectively). The similarity in membrane capacitance between TG4 and WT cells is consistent with a previous report that no cellular hypertrophy occurs in 2- to 4-month-old TG4 hearts (Milano et al., 1994; Xiao et al., 1999).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Properties of basal L-type Ca2+ current (ICa) recorded in single ventricular myocytes isolated from TG4 and WT mice. A, representative traces of ICa recorded from TG4 and WT cells. Inset, voltage clamp protocol to elicit ICa. B, current density-voltage curves obtained from TG4 and WT cells. C, relationship between voltage and inactivation time constants of ICa in TG4 and WT cells. The decay of ICa is fitted to the sum of two exponentials (see Experimental Procedures); n = 19 to 20 for data presented in B and C.

Next, we determined the current-voltage relation of ICa in both TG4 and WT myocytes. Cells were depolarized from a holding potential of -40 mV to various test potentials from -30 to +50 mV in 10-mV increments. Over the entire voltage range examined, the ICa density-voltage relations in TG4 and WT cells overlapped (Fig. 4B), indicating that voltage-dependent activation of L-type Ca2+ channel in TG4 cells was unchanged as compared with WT controls. Furthermore, ICa inactivation time constants (tau f and tau s) and the voltage-dependence of tau f or tau s of WT cells were similar to those of TG4 cells (Fig. 4C); likewise, there is no difference in the amplitude proportion of the two exponential components between these two groups (Af/As = 1.24 ± 0.08 at 0 mV, n = 20, in TG4 versus 1.19 ± 0.16, n = 19, in WT). Therefore, no measured parameters of ICa, including amplitude, voltage-dependence, and inactivation kinetics were altered by spontaneous beta 2AR activation in TG4 cardiac myocytes.

If L-type Ca2+ channels in TG4 cells were somehow modified via compensatory mechanisms so that ICa could no longer respond to beta 2-R*-mediated cAMP signaling, the ICa response to any other cAMP signaling should be similarly blunted. However, forskolin, an activator of adenylyl cyclase, induced a robust increase in the Cd2+-sensitive ICa in TG4 cells (Fig. 5, A and B). More importantly, the dose-response curves of ICa to forskolin in TG4 and WT cells virtually overlapped, with no significant difference in EC50 (3.97 × 10-7 M for WT and 5.96 × 10-7 M for TG4; P > .05, Fig. 5C). Thus, the sensitivity of cardiac L-type Ca2+ channel to cAMP-PKA modulation remains intact in TG4 mice.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Response of ICa to a beta 2AR agonist, zinterol, or an adenylyl cyclase activator, forskolin, in PTX-untreated cardiomyocyte from TG4 mice. A, time course of changes in the peak amplitude of ICa. ICa is activated by 300-ms depolarization pulses from a holding potential of -40 to 0 mV at 0.1 Hz. Note that ICa is not affected by zinterol at 10-6 M, but is markedly increased by forskolin at 10-6 M, and that ICa is abolished by 5 × 10-5 M Cd2+. B, selected current traces recorded before or after exposure to different drugs. Letters "a" to "e" correspond to those time points marked in A. C, dose-response curves of ICa to forskolin in myocytes from TG4 or WT hearts. The values of EC50 in WT (3.97 × 10-7 M) and TG4 (5.96 × 10-7 M) are not significantly different (P > .05). Each point represents mean ± S.E.M. of results from four to eight cells. Data are expressed as percentage of control value (C). Control values of ICa are 0.95 ± 0.09 nA for TG4 (n = 17) and 0.91 ± 0.07 nA for WT (n = 20).

Our recent studies have shown that cardiac beta 2AR couples to the PTX-sensitive inhibition proteins, (Gi) Gi2 and Gi3 (Xiao et al., 1995, 1999), and that this coupling partially offsets the beta 2AR agonist-mediated contractile response in rat myocytes (Xiao et al., 1995) and completely negates the beta 2AR agonist-mediated contractile (Xiao et al., 1999) and ICa responses (Fig. 5, A and B) in TG4 and WT murine ventricular myocytes. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that an excessive Gi coupling to beta 2-R* could be involved in the inability of beta 2-R* to modulate ICa. To test this hypothesis, baseline ICa was re-examined in PTX-treated cells and compared with that in PTX-untreated cells. Figure 6B shows that in TG4 cells, PTX treatment had no significant effect on the baseline ICa amplitude or its current-voltage relation. Similar results were also obtained in WT cells (Fig. 6A). Moreover, even in PTX-treated TG4 cells, neither the amplitude nor the kinetics of the basal ICa were affected by ICI (data not shown). These results suggest that Gi proteins are not involved in the unresponsiveness of ICa to beta 2-R*.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of PTX treatment on the baseline ICa and the response of ICa to zinterol in ventricular myocytes from WT and TG4 mice. A and B, current-voltage curves obtained in PTX-untreated (open symbols, dashed line) and PTX-treated cells (filled symbols, solid line) from WT (A) and TG4 (B) cells. C, current-voltage curves obtained before (open symbols, dashed lines) and 5 min after exposure to zinterol (10-6 M, filled symbols, solid lines) in PTX-treated TG4 cells. D, time course of changes in peak magnitude of ICa after exposure to zinterol (10-6 M) and the blockade of zinterol's effect by ICI (5 × 10-7 M) in a representative PTX-treated TG4 cell. In A-C, each symbol represents the means ± S.E.M. from 5 to 20 cells. *P < .05 compared with values before zinterol in PTX-treated TG4 cells.

Although Gi inhibition failed to rescue ICa response to beta 2-R*, in the same TG4 cells, PTX permitted beta 2-LR* induced by zinterol to significantly enhance ICa (Fig. 6, C and D). The PTX rescued ICa response to beta 2-LR* in TG4 cells (149 ± 12% of control, at 0 mV, n = 8) was comparable with that of WT cells (153 ± 11% of control, at 0 mV, n = 4). In addition, the ICa-voltage relation was shifted leftward by zinterol (V1/2 was -16.58 ± 1.33 and -23.03 ± 1.67 mV in the absence and presence of zinterol, respectively, P = .01, Fig. 6C), in agreement with previous observations in rat ventricular myocytes (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993). However, neither the inactivation kinetics (tau f, 101 ± 8% of control, tau s, 108 ± 3% of control), nor the ratio of Af/As (95 ± 19% of control, n = 5) were significantly altered by zinterol in PTX-treated TG4 cells. Figure 6D shows that the ICa response to zinterol in a PTX-treated TG4 cell was completely blocked by the beta 2AR-selective antagonist, ICI at 5 × 10-7 M (96.2 ± 6.2% of control, n = 5, P > .05 versus control). Thus, PTX treatment permits beta 2-LR*, but not beta 2-R*, to modulate L-type Ca2+ channel activity in TG4 heart.

Although in mouse cardiac myocytes beta 1-AR is unable to couple to Gi proteins, as manifested by the G protein photoaffinity labeling profile (Xiao et al., 1999), previous studies in guinea pig (Hool and Harvey, 1997) raised doubt as to whether the PTX rescued effect of zinterol is related to the activation of beta 1AR. We therefore examined the effect of beta 1AR stimulation in the presence and absence of PTX treatment in TG4 myocytes. Interestingly, beta 1AR agonist NE even at maximal concentration (NE 10-7 M) plus prazosin 10-6 M (Korzick et al., 1997) did not induce a discernible increase in ICa of TG4 cells, whereas it markedly increased ICa in WT myocytes (Fig. 7, A and B). The absence of ICa response to beta 1AR stimulation is consistent with previous observations on the loss of contractile response to beta 1AR stimulation by either NE plus prazosin or isoproterenol plus the beta 2AR blocker, ICI (Bond et al., 1995; Du et al., 1996). Whereas PTX treatment fully rescued the contractile (Xiao et al., 1999, also see Fig. 7C) and ICa (Fig. 6) response to beta 2AR agonist stimulation, it was unable to restore contractile and ICa response to beta 1AR stimulation (Fig. 7). In addition, in TG4 cells, the PTX-restored contractile response to a mixed beta AR agonist, isoproterenol 10-6 M, was specifically inhibited by a beta 2AR antagonist, ICI 10-7 M, but not by a beta 1AR antagonist, CGP 3 × 10-7 M (Fig. 7C). This further corroborates our previous notions that, unlike beta 2AR, beta 1AR does not couple to Gi protein(s) in mouse myocardium (Xiao et al., 1999).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   ICa and contractile response to beta AR stimulation in mouse ventricular myocyte. A, typical current traces recorded before or after beta 1AR stimulation by norepinephrine (NE, 10-7 M) plus prazosin (Praz, 10-6 M) in representative WT, TG4, and PTX-treated TG4 myocytes. B, average increase in ICa elicited by a depolarization pulse from -40 to 0 mV in response to beta 1AR stimulation. Control values of ICa are 1.03 ± 0.14 nA for WT (n = 7), 1.09 ± 0.06 nA for TG4 (n = 5), and 1.21 ± 0.15 nA for PTX-treated TG4 myocytes (n = 3). *P < .01 versus control. C, a typical example of continuous chart recording of cell length following beta AR stimulation by isoproterenol (ISO, 10-6 M) in a PTX-treated TG4 cell. An upward deflection indicates cell shortening. The beta 2AR antagonist, ICI118511 (ICI, 10-7 M), but not the beta 1AR antagonist, CGP20712A (CGP, 3 × 10-7 M), specifically inhibited the PTX-rescued contractile response to ISO. Similar results are observed in other 10 cells.

    Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

beta 2-R* Does Not Regulate ICa. The presence of beta 2-R* in the TG4 heart is evidenced by the elevated basal adenylyl cyclase activity (Milano et al., 1994) and cAMP production (Fig. 1A), the enhanced cardiac contractility (Milano et al., 1994; Bond et al., 1995; Du et al., 1996; Rockman et al., 1996; Xiao et al., 1999) (Fig. 1B), and the blockade of these augmentations by the inverse beta 2AR agonist, ICI (Milano et al., 1994; Bond et al., 1995; Du et al., 1996; Xiao et al., 1999) (Figs. 2 and 3). In the present study, we have provided direct evidence that beta 2-R*-mediated modulation of cardiac contractility is largely cAMP-PKA-dependent, because it is sensitive to the PKA inhibitor Rp-CPT-cAMPS (Fig. 3). The most surprising and unexpected finding of this study is that baseline ICa in TG4 cardiac myocytes is not increased or altered by beta 2-R* (Fig. 4). The simplest explanation for this observation would be that beta 2-R*-directed signaling is totally diverted from the L-type Ca2+ channels. However, the interpretation for the results obtained from the transgenic model may not be so straightforward, because compensatory changes have been documented in TG4 hearts, e.g., down-regulation of the SR protein phospholamban (PLB) (Rockman et al., 1996) and up-regulation of Gi proteins (R-P.X., unpublished data). Several additional experiments have therefore been undertaken to explore alternative possibilities.

If the L-type Ca2+ channel protein expression were reduced in TG4 heart cells so that ICa density in these cells was lower than normal in the absence of beta 2-R*, it could mask a beta 2-R*-mediated stimulatory effect on ICa. In other words, an adaptive "down-regulation" of ICa might offset an increase in this current induced by beta 2-R*. This possibility was tested by using the inverse beta 2AR agonist, ICI. Because ICI inactivates beta 2-R* and prevents spontaneous beta 2AR activation (Bond et al., 1995), the ICI-sensitive component would thus reflect the magnitude of the beta 2-R* effect. We have found that ICI has no detectable effect on ICa, although it markedly reduces basal cell contractility and cAMP content (Figs. 1-3). Thus, our results do not support an adaptive reduction in L-type Ca2+ channel number in TG4 mice.

A second possible explanation for the absence of enhancement of ICa in TG4 cells is that L-type Ca2+ channels might be somehow modified, thereby losing their sensitivity to cAMP-dependent modulation. If this were the case, ICa should no longer respond to any other cAMP-dependent stimulation, or the responses should be markedly attenuated. This possibility, however, have also been excluded on the basis that agonist-elicited beta 2AR stimulation enhances ICa (in PTX-treated TG4 myocytes) to an extent similar to that in (PTX-treated) WT cells; and that the ICa (in TG4 cells) dose-response curve to the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin overlaps with that in WT cells (Fig. 5C), indicating that the responsiveness of L-type Ca2+ channels to cAMP-PKA-dependent regulation in TG4 cells is not significantly altered. Thus, the unresponsiveness of ICa to beta 2-R* is not caused by the changes in the channel proteins.

In mammalian hearts, agonist-elicited beta 2AR stimulation evokes bifurcated Gs- and Gi-mediated signaling cascades: the beta 2AR-Gi pathway exerts a negative feedback control of the beta 2AR-Gs effects (Xiao et al., 1995, 1999; Zhou et al., 1997). The Gi-mediated inhibition of Gs signaling could account for the apparent uncoupling of beta 2-LR* to L-type Ca2+ channel in non-PTX-treated WT and TG4 cells, because PTX unmasks a de novo ICa response to beta 2AR agonist zinterol (Fig. 6, C and D), and the beta 2AR agonist zinterol enhances the photoaffinity labeling of the alpha  subunits of the Gi proteins, Gi2 and Gi3 (Xiao et al., 1999). However, Gi-mediated inhibition cannot explain the inability of beta 2-R* to augment ICa in TG4 cells, because PTX fails to potentiate basal ICa(Fig. 6B), and ICI has no effect on the baseline ICa regardless of PTX (Figs. 2 and 3). These functional results suggest that beta 2-R* does not couple to Gi proteins as efficiently as does beta 2-LR*. This is in good agreement with the fact that in transgenic mice with high or medium levels of beta 2AR overexpression, beta 2AR in the absence of an agonist, coprecipitates with Gs but barely with Gi/Go (Gurdal et al., 1997). Taken together, we conclude that spontaneous beta 2AR activation in TG4 cells, whereas increasing cell contractility, does not regulate ICa, a key effector of beta 2-LR*.

Differences between beta 2-R*- and beta 2-LR*-Mediated Signaling. In contrast to the prediction of the two-state receptor model, the differential regulation of ICa by beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* suggests that the liganded and unliganded active beta 2ARs are different active receptor species, likely having different conformations and initiating distinct postreceptor signaling pathways. Several lines of additional evidence support this hypothesis. First of all, whereas beta 2-R* in TG4 heart significantly increases the baseline contractility, beta 2-LR* induced by zinterol or isoproterenol at maximal concentrations are unable to further increase contraction amplitude (Milano et al., 1994; Du et al., 1996; Xiao et al., 1999), even though the basal contractility is not at the maximum contractile state yet (Du et al., 1996; Xiao et al., 1999). Secondly, beta 2-R*, unlike beta 2-LR*, does not couple to Gi proteins, as reflected by the lack of a PTX effect on the basal ICa (Fig. 6) and by immunoprecipitation data on receptor-G protein interaction (Gurdal et al., 1997). Finally, it has recently been shown that in rat and mouse cardiac myocytes, multiple active conformational states of beta 2AR can be induced by different beta 2AR ligands (R-P.X., unpublished data). Similar observations have been reported previously for beta 2AR and other G protein-coupled receptors in transfected cells (e.g., Eason et al., 1994) or artificial lipid vesicles (Gether et al., 1997). The present finding that beta 2-R* differs from beta 2-LR* is in general agreement with the emerging concept of multiple active receptor states for a given receptor.

Another intriguing difference between beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* is manifested by their chronic noncontractile effect. Agonist-induced, chronic, mixed beta AR or beta 2AR stimulation has been shown to enhance cardiac cell growth in vitro (Boluyt et al., 1995; Zhou et al., 1996) and cause cardiac hypertrophy in vivo (Kudej et al., 1997). Cardiac hypertrophy also occurs in other transgenic murine models in which Gs or the cAMP signaling cascade has been genetically up-regulated (Iwase et al., 1996). In contrast, the TG4 model is exceptional in that it has tonically elevated cardiac contractile function and cAMP signaling without evident cardiac and cellular hypertrophy as shown in the present and previous studies (Milano et al., 1994; Xiao et al., 1999, Heubach et al., 1999). Given the central role of sarcolemmal ICa in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, and given the role of Ca2+ signaling in cell hypertrophy in vivo and in vitro (Molkentin et al., 1998), it is tempting to speculate that the lack of L-type Ca2+ current response to beta 2-R*, as demonstrated here, may be of particular relevance to the lack of cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyopathy in the TG4 model.

The present results also illustrate that, although both beta 2-LR* (Xiao et al., 1999) and beta 2-R* (Fig. 3) couple to cAMP-dependent signal transduction pathway, their cAMP signaling may be differentially compartmentalized. Specifically, the cyclase activity or cAMP-PKA signal due to beta 2-R* must be somehow shielded from L-type Ca2+ channels, but is readily accessible to other E-C coupling machineries. In contrast to beta 2-R*, previous studies in many species (rat, mouse, and dog) have shown that, L-type Ca2+ channel is the major target protein of beta 2-LR*, whereas the SR and other cytosolic proteins do not always respond to beta 2-LR*-stimulated cAMP-PKA signaling (Xiao et al., 1994; Altschuld et al., 1995; Kuschel et al., 1999b). Thus, beta 2-R* differs qualitatively from beta 2-LR*; this difference might not be simply explained by different coupling efficiency to various targets. Taken together, not only the receptor type or subtype (e.g., Zhou et al., 1997), but also the conformational state of the same receptor is an important determinant of intracellular sorting of cAMP signaling. Selective shielding of cAMP signaling from a subset of target proteins implies that an additional counteracting mechanism(s) must be simultaneously engaged. In this respect, we have shown, in rat and dog, that the beta 2-LR*-Gi signaling pathway can fully antagonize the beta 2-LR*-Gs- cAMP-mediated effects in the bulk cytosolic compartment (Xiao et al., 1994; Altschuld et al., 1995; Kuschel et al., 1999a); but not in the vicinity of L-type Ca2+ channel (Xiao and Lakatta, 1993; Altschuld et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 1995; Zhou et al., 1997; Kuschel et al., 1999b). In the mouse, beta 2-LR*-Gi signaling dominates, negating beta 2-LR*-Gs effects in both sarcolemmal and cytosolic compartments (Xiao et al., 1999; also see Fig. 5, A and B). Hence, activation of Gi is involved in the intracellular sorting of beta 2-LR*-Gs-cAMP signal. However, the same mechanism cannot explain the inability of beta 2-R* to modulate the L-type Ca2+ channel because there is little beta 2-R*-Gi coupling (Gurdal et al., 1997), and in the present study, PTX treatment cannot potentiate the basal ICa in TG4 cells (Fig. 6B). Thus, some unidentified mechanisms must be involved in the differential cAMP signaling induced by beta 2-R* versus beta 2-LR*. For example, beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* could couple to different isoforms of Gs (Seifert et al., 1998) or adenylyl cyclase (for review see Tang and Hurley, 1998), or to distinctively localized components of the cAMP signaling cascade, such as cAMP (Hohl and Li, 1991) or PKA (Buxton and Brunton, 1983). In addition, localized activation of phosphodiesterase (Jurevicius and Fischmeister, 1996), protein phosphatase (Kuschel et al., 1999a), or specific anchoring proteins of PKA (Gray et al., 1998) may also contribute to subcellular compartmentalization of cAMP or PKA during beta 2-R* or beta 2-LR* stimulation. The exact mechanism underlying the inability of beta 2-R*-cAMP signaling to regulate ICa remains to be elucidated in future studies.

Possible Mechanism for beta 2-R* to Augment Cardiac Contractility. Cardiac contractility is an integrated parameter determined by several effectors involved in the E-C coupling cascade. Although ICa is unaffected by beta 2-R*, the increase in the adenylyl cyclase activity and cAMP production may modulate the E-C coupling cascade by PKA-dependent phosphorylation of target proteins downstream of L-type Ca2+ channels, e.g., the SR Ca2+ release channels, SR membrane protein PLB, and some contractile proteins. Indeed, our preliminary observations have shown that in TG4 ventricular myocytes, the frequency of "Ca2+ sparks" (i.e., the elementary SR Ca2+ release events) and the amplitude of whole cell Ca2+ transients are markedly increased in TG4 cells, and that both are sensitive to ICI. In addition, there is an adaptive down-regulation of PLB expression in TG4 hearts (Rockman et al., 1996) and thereby less basal inhibition of the SR Ca2+ pump in cardiac cells from these transgenic animals. Thus, the enhanced SR Ca2+ recycling may be sufficient to account for the augmentation of baseline contractility in TG4 heart. Regardless of the specific mechanism, the suppression of the enhanced basal contractility by Rp-CPT-cAMPS (Fig. 3) indicates that the beta 2-R*-elicited contractile effect is largely cAMP/PKA dependent.

Loss of beta 1AR Function Associated with beta 2AR Overexpression. Although both beta 1AR and beta 2AR coexist in mouse ventricular myocyte, the function of beta 1AR is undetectable in beta 2AR overexpression transgenic (TG4) murine heart, as shown by the absence of ICa (Fig. 7, A and B) or contractile response (Fig. 7C; also see Bond et al., 1995; Du et al., 1996) to beta 1AR stimulation by either NE plus prazosin or isoproterenol plus the beta 2AR blocker, ICI. In contrast, in WT mouse ventricular myocyte, beta 1AR stimulation produced a dose-dependent increase in contraction amplitude (Korzick et al., 1997) and ICa (Fig. 7, A and B). In TG4 myocytes, PTX treatment only rescues the contractile and ICa responses to beta 2AR agonists, but not to beta 1AR agonists (Fig. 7; also see Xiao et al., 1999). Although the exact mechanism for the loss of beta 1AR function in TG4 heart is unknown, this phenotype seems to be linked to the overexpression of beta 2AR, because the beta 1AR function also disappeared in rat C6 glioma cells overexpressed beta 2AR (Zhong et al., 1996). These results indicate a complex interaction between beta AR subtypes (Zhong et al., 1996).

beta 2-AR Stimulation in TG4 Hearts at Different Ages. Recent studies have shown that ICa density is increased in embryonic/neonatal TG4 myocytes (An et al., 1999), but decreased in 3- to 8-month old TG4 mouse heart cells (Heubach et al., 1999) as compared with age-matched controls. In the present study, we found no evidence for any difference in ICa characteristics between transgenic and WT cells from young adult animals (2-3 months old). This apparent discrepancy may reflect an age-related change in beta AR signaling cascade. In nontransgenic rat, there are striking developmental changes with respect to beta 2AR agonist sensitivity and functions (Kuznetsov et al., 1995, Xiao et al., 1998), perhaps due to a developmental changes in beta 2AR-Gi coupling. In this scenario, it is not surprising that spontaneous beta 2AR activation may exhibit differential functions at different stages of development. Alternatively, it is possible that some compensatory changes (e.g., expression of L-type Ca2+ channel) may occur progressively as a result of the receptor overexpression, rendering divergent and even conflicting phenotypes at different ages. Nevertheless, as discussed above, a compensatory change in Ca2+ channel sensitivity to cAMP-PKA signaling cannot account for the inability of beta 2-R*s to regulate ICa in the young mouse heart.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that there is a common thread among these reports: the effect of beta 2-R*s in TG4 cardiac myocytes is highly compartmentalized and target protein-specific. In embryonic/neonatal TG4 cells, beta 2-R*s augment ICa but not cAMP-sensitive potassium currents (IK) (An et al., 1999). In young adult TG4 cells (2-3 months), baseline contraction is increased but ICa is unchanged (this study); whereas in older (3-8 months) TG4 cells, ICa is down-regulated without changing baseline contractility (Heubach et al., 1999). The results in adult TG4 cells also suggest a general pattern for dissociation between alterations in baseline contractility and ICa in this transgenic model.

In summary, we have provided several lines of evidence that in TG4 cardiac myocytes, ligand-independent, spontaneously activated beta 2ARs, in contrast to the ligand-activated beta 2ARs, do not regulate the L-type Ca2+ channel, despite the fact that both beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* can increase cAMP and contractility. However, salient properties of L-type channels in TG4 cells are unaltered and ICa response to beta 2-LR* (in PTX-treated cells) or forskolin remains intact. These results suggest that beta 2-R* may differ from beta 2-LR*, and thereby the two-state receptor model apparently needs to be expanded to accommodate additional active receptor species. These novel findings of the present study also raise many important unsolved questions. 1) What is the mechanism controlling the sorting of intracellular signals en route from the same receptor at different active states? 2) What are the effectors via which beta 2-R* produce a positive inotropic effect? 3) Why are L-type Ca2+ channels inaccessible to beta 2-R*-stimulated cAMP yet receptive to beta 2-LR*- and adenylyl cyclase-elicited cAMP signaling? 4) What is the mechanism underlying the development- and age-associated differences in beta 2-AR signaling? Future studies are required to further understand these detailed aspects of beta 2-R* and beta 2-LR* signaling.

    Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Walter J. Koch and Robert J. Lefkowitz for kindly providing the beta 2AR overexpression transgenic (TG4) mice, and Dr. Harold A. Spurgeon and Bruce Ziman for their excellent technical support.

    Footnotes

Received March 1, 1999; Accepted May 14, 1999

Send reprint requests to: Rui-Ping Xiao, M.D., Ph.D., Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5600 Nathan Shock Dr., Baltimore, MD 21224. E-mail: xiaor{at}grc.nia.nih.gov

    Abbreviations

beta AR, beta -adrenergic receptor, beta -R*, spontaneously activated beta AR; beta -LR*, ligand activated beta AR; CGP, CGP20712A; E-C, excitation-contraction; Gi and Gs, inhibitory and stimulatory G protein(s), respectively; ICa, L-type Ca2+ current; ICI, ICI118,551; NE, norepinephrine; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A; PLB, phospholamban; PTX, pertussis toxin; R and R*, inactive and active receptor conformational states, respectively; Rp-CPT-cAMPS, Rp diastereomers of 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP; SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum; TG4 mice, transgenic mice overexpressing human beta 2AR; WT mice, wild-type mice..

    References
Top
Summary
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References