|
|
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 4, 684-692, October 1999
Subunit of Gi1
: Differences in
Receptor-Constitutive Activity Imparted by Single Amino Acid
Substitutions in Gi1
Molecular Pharmacology Group, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fusion proteins were generated between the human
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor and both
wild-type (Cys351) and pertussis toxin-resistant
(Gly351 and Ile351) forms of Gi1.
These were expressed stably. Pertussis toxin treatment substantially
reduced basal high-affinity GTPase activity in clones expressing the
5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1
construct but
not in clones expressing 5-HT1A receptor
(Gly351)Gi1
or
(Ile351)Gi1
. Spiperone functioned as an
inverse agonist in membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor
wild-type Gi1
fusion protein and in those expressing
5-HT1A receptor (Ile351)Gi1
but
not the 5-HT1A receptor
(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein. The effect of
spiperone at the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
construct but not the 5-HT1A receptor
(Ile351)Gi1
construct was blocked by
pertussis toxin treatment. By contrast, agonists functioned with equal
effectiveness at the three fusion proteins and were unaffected by
pertussis toxin treatment of the (Ile351)Gi1
- and
(Gly351)Gi1
-containing constructs. 5-HT
resulted in strong inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase
in intact cells expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor. In
fusion protein-expressing cells, 5-HT-mediated inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase was also observed. Pertussis toxin treatment obliterated
5-HT-mediated inhibition in cells expressing the isolated receptor and
the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1
fusion
protein but not in those expressing the 5-HT1A receptor
(Ile351) or (Gly351)Gi1
fusion
proteins. These studies demonstrate that alteration of a single amino
acid in Gi1
located at a key contact site between the G
protein and a G protein-coupled receptor can regulate
agonist-independent constitutive activity of the G protein-coupled
receptor and that fusion proteins can directly regulate adenylyl cyclase.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5-hydroxytryptamine
(5-HT) mediates a wide range of physiological actions via activation of
a large family of receptors. With the exception of the
5-HT3 receptor, which is an intrinsic cation channel, all of the receptors for 5-HT are members of the superfamily of seven transmembrane element, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A
highly studied member of this family is the
5-HT1A receptor, which is expressed both
presynaptically on serotinergic nerve bodies, where it functions as an
autoreceptor to dampen neuronal activity, and postsynaptically in many
locations in the central nervous system to which serotinergic neurones
project. Signal transduction from this GPCR is mediated predominantly
via activation of members of the pertussis toxin-sensitive family of
Gi-like G proteins and involves inhibitory
regulation of adenylyl cyclase as well as modulation of the activity of
a series of ion channels (Julius, 1998
). Considerable interest
has been accorded pharmacological studies indicating a likely role for
this GPCR in the regulation of anxiety states, and the recent
production of mice lacking expression of this GPCR has confirmed these
ideas (Heisler et al., 1998
; Ramboz et al., 1998
).
In a series of studies designed to address details of the interactions
of GPCRs and G proteins, we have recently constructed a number of
fusion proteins in which the N terminus of a G protein
subunit was
linked directly to the C-terminal tail of a GPCR (Wise and Milligan,
1997
; Wise et al., 1997a
,b
, 1999
). Some of the constructs we have
examined in detail have utilized the
2A adrenoceptor (Wise and Milligan, 1997
; Wise et al. 1997a
,b
). This GPCR
is well established to function predominantly via members of the
Gi family of G proteins. After stable expression
of an
2A
adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein in which the G
protein was altered by conversion of cysteine351
to glycine to render it insensitive to the actions of pertussis toxin,
we noted that although inhibition of adenylyl cyclase could be produced
by
2A adrenoceptor agonists in untreated
cells, this was abolished after pertussis toxin treatment and thus
could not have been mediated via the G protein linked to the GPCR (Burt et al., 1998
).
In the present study, we have generated fusion proteins between the
human 5-HT1A receptor and both wild-type
(Cys351) and pertussis toxin-insensitive
(Gly351 and Ile351) forms
of Gi1
. After stable expression of these
constructs in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells,
ligand-mediated modulation of their GTPase activity and regulation of
adenylyl cyclase activity were examined. As point mutation of
residue351 of Gi1
can alter both the maximal effectiveness of agonist ligands (Bahia et
al., 1998
; Carr et al., 1998
) and the relative intrinsic activity of
different agonists (Jackson et al., 1999
) we wished to assess how
agonist-independent, constitutive activity might be modified by
mutation of this residue, which lies within a key GPCR-G protein
contact domain. We note marked constitutive activity of the
5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
fusion protein and the
5-HT1A receptor
(Ile351)-Gi1
fusion
protein, but not the 5-HT1A receptor
(Gly351)-Gi1
fusion
protein, which could be inhibited by the inverse agonist spiperone.
Confirmation that the constitutive activity of the
5-HT1A receptor (Ile351)
Gi1
fusion protein was inherently derived from
intramolecular interactions of the two elements of the fusion protein
was provided by the inability of pertussis toxin treatment to prevent
spiperone-mediated inhibition of GTPase activity at this construct.
These studies provide the first demonstration that single amino acid
alterations in a G protein can significantly alter agonist-independent
constitutive activity of a GPCR. Furthermore, we also record clear
agonist-induced inhibitory regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity,
which proceeds via the G protein of the fusion constructs.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
All materials for tissue culture were supplied by
Life Technologies Inc. (Paisley, Strathclyde, UK). Both the
5-HT1A receptor antagonist
[3H]4(2'-methoxy)-phenyl-1-[2'-(N-2"-pyridinyl)-p-fluorobenzamido]ethyl-piperazine (MPPF; 78.3 Ci/mmol) and [
-32P]GTP (30 Ci/mmol) were obtained from DuPont-NEN (Boston, MA). Cholera toxin and
pertussis toxin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Oligonucleotides were purchased from Cruachem (Glasgow, Strathclyde,
UK). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma and Boehringer
Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany).
Construction of Plasmids Encoding 5HT1A,
5HT1A-Gi1
Fusion Proteins.
The human
5HT1A receptor clone in pSP64 (a gift from
Glaxo-Wellcome, Stevenage, UK) was digested with
XbaI/BamHI and the resulting 1.5-kb fragment
ligated to pcDNA3. To obtain the open reading frame of 1.3 kb,
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using the
following primers to introduce a HindIII restriction site at
the 5' end and to remove the stop codon and introduce a
BamHI restriction site at the 3' end, respectively:
5'-CTGAAGCTTATGGATGTGCTCAGCCCTGGTC-3'; 5'-CTGGGA TCCCTGGCGGCAGAAGTTACACTTAATG-3' (restriction
enzyme sites underlined). The PCR fragment was digested with
HindIII and BamHI and ligated into pcDNA3 to make
the plasmid p5HT. To link the Gi1
wild-type
(Cys351) cDNA to the 5HT1A
receptor sequence, PCR was carried out on Gi1
to produce compatible restriction sites. The oligonucleotides used to
do this were 5'-CTGGGATCCGGCTGCACACTGAGCGCTGAG-3' at the 5'
end and 5'-GAGAATTCTTAGAAAGAGACCACAGTC-3' for the 3' end.
The plasmid p5HT was digested with BamHI/EcoRI as
was the Gi1
PCR fragment and the two were
ligated to give the plasmid p5HTGi1. To construct the
5HT1A-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion plasmid
(Gly351)Gi1
in PBS was
digested with SacII/EcoRI and the 730-bp fragment was used to replace the corresponding fragment in p5HTGi1. An equivalent strategy was used to produce
5HT1A-(Ile351)Gi1
.
The constructs were then sequenced to verify the DNA sequence.
Cell Culture and Stable Expression. HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% (v/v) newborn calf serum, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells were seeded into 100-mm culture dishes and grown to 60 to 80% confluence (18-24 h) before transfection with 5 µg of appropriate cDNAs using N-[1-(2,3-dideoxyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethyl ammonium methyl sulphate reagent (Boehringer Mannheim). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were split 1:4 into 800 µg/ml G418 sulfate (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) containing medium. A 100-mm dish of untransfected HEK293 cells was also split into the same medium as a control dish. About 1 week later, after all the cells in the control dish had died, G418-resistant cells in the transfected dishes were picked and transferred into 24-well plates using autoclaved pipette tips. About 20 clones of each cDNA were picked and grown in 1 ml/well of G418 medium (400 µg/ml). Clones were amplified, membrane preparations made, and their binding of [3H]MPPF determined.
Preparation of Membranes.
Plasma membrane-containing P2
particulate fractions were prepared from cell pastes that had been
stored at
80°C after harvesting. Cell pellets were resuspended in
TE buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)/0.1 mM EDTA], and rupture of the
cells was achieved with 25 strokes of a hand-held Teflon-on-glass
homogenizer. Unbroken cells and nuclei were removed by centrifugation
at low speed (2000 rpm) in a refrigerated microcentrifuge. The
supernatant fraction was then centrifuged at 75,000 rpm for 30 min in a
Beckman Optima TLX Ultracentrifuge with a TLA100.2 rotor. The pellets
were resuspended in TE buffer to a final protein concentration of 1 to
3 mg/ml and stored at
80°C until required.
[3H]MPPF Binding Studies. Binding assays were performed by adding 5 to 10 µg of membrane protein to an assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% ascorbic acid, 10 µM pargyline, pH 7.4) containing [3H]MPPF (0.25-20 nM). Nonspecific binding was determined in parallel in the presence of 100 µM 5-HT. Samples were incubated at 30°C for 40 min and then terminated by rapid filtration through GF/C filters. The filters were washed 3 times with 5 ml of ice-cold wash buffer (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% ascorbic acid, pH 7.4) and then counted.
High-Affinity GTPase Assays.
The assays were performed as
described by McKenzie and Milligan (1990)
with modifications as
described by Wise et al. (1997a
,b
) to allow measurement of
Vmax in a number of cases. In such studies concentrations of GTP used as substrate ranged from 22 nM to 2 µM.
Intact Cell Adenylyl Cyclase Assays.
Intact cell adenylyl
cyclase assays were performed essentially as described by Wong (1994)
and Merkouris et al. (1997)
. Cells were split into wells of a 24-well
plate and incubated in medium containing
[3H]adenine at 0.5 µCi/well for 16 to 24 h. The generation of [3H]cAMP in response to
ligands was then assessed in the presence of the nonselective cAMP
phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine (1 mM).
Miscellaneous. All experiments were performed on a minimum of three occasions using cells or membrane preparations derived from different cell passages. Where appropriate data are presented as means ± S.E.M.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PCR was used to amplify a cDNA encoding the human
5-HT1A receptor and in the process both remove
the stop codon and introduce a BamHI restriction site in
this region. This amplified cDNA was ligated to cDNAs encoding
full-length forms of either wild-type (Cys351)Gi1
or either
Gly351 or Ile351, pertussis
toxin-resistant, forms of this G protein, which we have described
previously (Wise et al., 1997c
; Bahia et al., 1998
). These had been
amplified to remove the initiator codon and introduce a
BamHI restriction site at the 5' end (Fig.
1). The ligated products were fully
sequenced and were predicted to encode single open reading frames of
776 amino acids. Both these fusion constructs and the isolated
5-HT1A receptor were expressed stably in HEK293 cells and a number of individual clones isolated based on their capacity to specifically bind the selective antagonist ligand [3H]MPPF. Membrane preparations from cells
either untreated or pretreated with pertussis toxin (25 ng/ml, 16 h) and expressing the isolated receptor or either wild-type- or
Gly351 Gi1
-containing
fusion proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(PAGE) and immunoblotted with an antiserum, I1C (Green et al., 1990
),
which identifies an epitope between amino acids 159 and 168 of
Gi1
. All of these membranes expressed a 41-kDa
polypeptide that comigrated with an I1C-reactive polypeptide from rat
brain cortex, a particularly rich source of
Gi1
(Fig. 2,
bottom). Prior pertussis toxin treatment slightly slowed the mobility
of this polypeptide through SDS-PAGE, as demonstrated for other systems
(Wise et al., 1997a
,c
), a feature associated with the ADP-ribosylation
of this and other pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins (Fig. 2,
bottom). Membranes expressing either of these 5-HT1A receptor-containing fusion proteins, but
not the isolated receptor, also contained I1C-reactive polypeptides of
apparent Mr of 85 to 90 kDa,
consistent with expression of the fusion proteins (Fig. 2, top).
Alterations in mobility of the fusion protein containing the wild-type
form of the G protein in response to pertussis toxin treatment could
not be observed. We believe this to reflect the large size of the
fusion construct and thus its mobility through SDS-PAGE rather than its
inability to be modified by pertussis toxin (see below).
|
|
Membranes from clones expressing each of the three fusion proteins were
used to perform saturation binding studies with
[3H]MPPF (Fig. 3
and data not shown). These indicated that each clone selected for
detailed study expressed high levels of an apparently single population
of [3H]MPPF binding sites with
Bmax in the region of 10 pmol/mg membrane protein and a Kd for
[3H]MPPF of 2.7 ± 0.2 nM. Prior treatment
with pertussis toxin did not modify these parameters substantially
(Fig. 3).
|
Addition of 100 µM 5-HT to membranes of cells expressing each of the
fusion proteins allowed stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity.
To explore these processes in detail, 5-HT stimulation of high-affinity
GTPase activity was examined at a range of GTP concentrations. In
membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor
(Gly351)Gi1
fusion
protein the agonist produced stimulation of high GTPase activity over a
range of nucleotide concentrations (20 nM-2 µM) and transformation
of such data to Eadie-Hofstee plots demonstrated the agonist to produce
a large increase in Vmax without alteration
in Km for GTP (Fig.
4A). Prior pertussis toxin treatment of
these cells did not significantly reduce basal high-affinity GTPase
activity and had little effect on 5-HT stimulation of activity (Fig.
4A). By contrast, pertussis toxin pretreatment greatly reduced basal
high-affinity GTPase activity in the 5-HT1A
receptor wild-type Gi1
fusion
protein-expressing membranes (Fig. 4B) and substantially inhibited, but
did not fully block, the capacity of 5-HT to stimulate this activity
(Fig. 4B). Such data infer that the signal observed after pertussis
toxin treatment in cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor (Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein must represent activation of the linked
(Gly351)Gi1
of the
fusion protein and imply little or no activation of the endogenously
expressed forms of Gi by this fusion protein. By
contrast, the effects of pertussis toxin in membranes derived from
cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor fusion
protein containing the wild-type G protein suggest both constitutive
activity of this construct and the maintenance of a level of
5-HT-mediated functional activation of the linked G protein even when
ADP-ribose has been attached to Cys351.
|
To explore both these differences in greater detail, membranes were
prepared from cells expressing each of the fusion proteins, both with
and without prior pertussis toxin treatment. The effects of toxin
treatment on basal and ligand regulation of high-affinity GTPase
activity were then explored using the agonists 5-HT,
7-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (7-OH DPAT) and 8-OH
DPAT. Each of the agonists stimulated high-affinity GTPase
activity to similar extents at maximally effective concentrations in
untreated cells (Fig. 5 and data not
shown). As anticipated from the data of Fig. 4, the effects of each of
the agonists were unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment of cells
expressing the 5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
(Fig. 5) and
-(Ile351)Gi1
(data not
shown) fusion proteins and were blunted but not eliminated in cells
expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
fusion protein (Fig. 5).
|
The ligand spiperone has been described as an inverse agonist at the
human 5-HT1A receptor (Barr and Manning, 1997
;
Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997a
). At high concentrations spiperone
clearly functioned as an inverse agonist in untreated membranes
expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
fusion protein (Fig.
6A). No further effect of spiperone could
be recorded, however, after pertussis toxin treatment of these cells
(Fig. 6A), which as noted also in Fig. 4B reduced basal GTPase activity
significantly. By contrast, no effect of spiperone as an inverse
agonist could be measured in either in untreated or pertussis
toxin-treated membranes expressing the 5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein (Fig. 6A), a feature consistent with the inability of
pertussis toxin treatment to reduce basal high-affinity GTPase in
membranes of these cells (Fig. 4A). In untreated membranes expressing
the 5-HT1A
receptor-(Ile351)Gi1
fusion protein spiperone again displayed marked inverse agonism (Fig.
6A). As the basal GTPase activity of these membranes was unaffected by
pertussis toxin treatment (Fig. 6A), spiperone still functioned as an
inverse agonist after toxin treatment (Fig. 6A). These results
confirmed that the constitutive GTPase activity in the
5-HT1A
receptor-(Ile351)Gi1
fusion protein expressing membranes, which was suppressed by spiperone,
directly reflected activity derived from intramolecular interactions
between the GPCR and G protein elements of the fusion protein. As with
the stimulatory effects of 5-HT on the fusion proteins described above,
the inhibitory effect of spiperone on the basal GTPase activity of the
5-HT1A
receptor-(Ile351)Gi1
fusion protein reflected a decrease in Vmax
(Fig. 6B). Further analysis of these effects were produced by use of a
range of concentrations of these ligands in membranes expressing the
5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1
fusion protein (Fig.
7). 5-HT (EC50 = 1.0 ± 0.4 × 10
8 M, nH = 0.60)
and 8-OH DPAT (EC50 = 3.3 ± 1.1 × 10
8 M, nH = 0.57) displayed similar
potencies to activate the high-affinity GTPase activity of this
construct, whereas 7-OH DPAT displayed a significantly lower potency
(EC50 = 1.8 ± 0.8 × 10
6 M, nH = 0.47). The inverse agonist
effects of spiperone were produced with EC50 of
7.1 ± 2.4 × 10
8 M and nH = 1.09. After pertussis toxin treatment not only were the maximal effects
of the agonists blunted but required substantially higher ligand
concentrations (Fig. 7). Because of the differences in effects of both
pertussis toxin treatment and spiperone on the high-affinity GTPase
activity of membranes expressing the various GPCR-G protein fusion
proteins, equivalent experiments were performed on separate clones
expressing each construct. Equivalent results to those described above
were recorded in each case (data not shown).
|
|
Comparison of the effects of 5-HT to stimulate high-affinity GTPase
activity via the isolated 5-HT1A receptor and
each of the fusion proteins demonstrated highly similar potencies
(EC50 = 6 × 10
8
M
2 × 10
7 M) and slope
coefficients (nH = 0.52-0.64) of the agonist (Fig. 8). Although there was no detectable
ability of 5-HT to stimulate high-affinity GTPase activity via the
isolated receptor after pertussis toxin treatment (Fig. 8), and no
alteration in function of 5-HT was recorded at the
5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein (EC50 = 6.5 ± 2.0 × 10
8 M, nH = 0.62), a clear reduction in
effectiveness and potency (EC50 = 1.2 ± 0.2 × 10
6 M) was recorded for 5-HT at the
5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
fusion protein (Fig. 8).
|
The 5-HT1A receptor is well established as a
member of the family of GPCRs able to cause inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase activity. In intact cells expressing the isolated
5-HT1A receptor, forskolin (50 µM)-amplified
adenylyl cyclase activity was inhibited in a concentration-dependent
manner with EC50 of 1.2 ± 0.6 × 10
9 M. This was obliterated after pertussis
toxin treatment of the cells (Fig. 9). In
cells expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1
fusion protein, 5-HT produced a profound,
virtually complete, inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase
activity with EC50 = 6.4 ± 0.4 × 10
9 M, which again was fully prevented by
pertussis toxin treatment (Fig. 10A).
5-HT displayed similar potency (EC50 = 3.7 ± 0.2 × 10
9 M) to mediate inhibition of
forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity via the
5-HT1A
receptor-(Ile351)Gi1
fusion protein. However, now prior pertussis toxin treatment did not
modify the effect of the agonist (Fig. 10B). Similar results were
produced in cells expressing the 5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein except that the potency of 5-HT was some 10-fold lower
(EC50 = 5.5 ± 0.6 × 10
8 M) but again pertussis toxin treatment did
not substantially modify the inhibition (Fig. 10C). A surprising
feature of adenylyl cyclase inhibition in cells expressing the fusion
proteins containing both
(Ile351)Gi1
and
(Cys351)Gi1
was the
apparent cooperativity of the effects of 5-HT. In both cases the
concentration-effect curves had pseudo Hill coefficients between 1.5 and 2.0.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current study, we have used the strategy of constructing
and stably expressing fusion proteins between a GPCR and a G protein
subunit to promote and explore interactions between the human
5-HT1A receptor and forms of the G protein
Gi1
. To do so we used both wild-type
Gi1
and mutationally modified
(Gly351, Ile351) forms of
the G protein, which have previously been characterized extensively
(Wise et al., 1997a
; Bahia et al., 1998
; Jackson et al., 1999
),
and are resistant to ADP ribosylation catalyzed by pertussis toxin.
Each of these three fusion proteins, as well as the isolated
5-HT1A receptor, were expressed stably in HEK293 cells before functional analysis. In part, these studies were designed to build on our recent analyses of a stably expressed
2A adrenoceptor-(Gly351)
Gi1
fusion protein (Burt et al., 1998
).
However, the current studies have produced a significant range of
differences from, as well as some similarities with, the previous
studies. The most important of these is the clear demonstration that
alteration of a single amino acid in the G protein can result in
substantial differences in the constitutive activity of the GPCR-G
protein fusion protein.
Identification of expression of the 5-HT1A
receptor-Gi1
fusion proteins was achieved in
two ways, first in ligand-binding studies using the selective
5-HT1A receptor antagonist
[3H]MPPF. Such studies allowed selection for
detailed analysis of clones expressing good levels of the fusion
proteins and clones expressing similar levels of the
5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
and 5-HT1A
receptor-pertussis toxin-resistant Gi1
forms.
Second, immunoblots of membrane fractions of these clones using an
antiserum with an epitope between amino acids 159 and 168 of
Gi1
identified polypeptides of apparent
Mr between 85 and 90 kDa, whereas a clone expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor did not,
although it too specifically bound [3H]MPPF.
One attraction of the fusion protein strategy has been to allow
detailed analysis of the receptor constructs as agonist-regulated high-affinity GTPases (Wise et al., 1997b
; Carr et al., 1998
). At a
maximally effective concentration of 5-HT, each of the
5-HT1A receptor Gi1
fusion proteins caused a large stimulation of membrane high-affinity
GTPase activity. In previous studies of an
2A
adrenoceptor-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein stably expressed in Rat-1 fibroblasts (Burt et al.,
1998
), analysis of agonist function in membranes of untreated and
pertussis toxin-pretreated cells indicated that a large fraction of the
agonist-stimulated signal derived from activation of the endogenously
expressed forms of Gi. As such, pertussis toxin
pretreatment was required to isolate and analyze GPCR interaction with
the linked G protein. However, in the current studies, pertussis toxin pretreatment, under conditions which clearly caused ADP ribosylation of
essentially the entire pool of endogenous Gi as
measured by the reduced mobility of the modified protein through
SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2), had essentially no effect on agonist-stimulated
GTPase activity in membranes expressing the
5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
or
-(Ile351)Gi1
fusion
proteins (Fig. 4). These results indicate a lack of functional access
of the expressed 5-HT1A receptor pertussis toxin-resistant Gi1
fusion proteins to a
significant pool of endogenous Gi. Pertussis
toxin treatment of these cells also had little effect on basal
high-affinity GTPase activity, an observation that could be interpreted
to suggest little constitutive activity (Samama et al., 1993
; Lefkowitz
et al., 1993
) of these fusion proteins. However, because these fusion
proteins cannot act as substrates for pertussis toxin-catalyzed
ADP-ribosylation these are not clear-cut experiments. To address this
issue we made use of previous reports that spiperone acts as an inverse
agonist at the human 5-HT1A receptor, able to
reduce basal, agonist-independent, signal transduction (Barr and
Manning, 1997
; Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997a
,b
). This ligand had
little or no effect on the basal GTPase activity of membranes
expressing the 5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
(Fig. 6A). However, in membranes expressing
5-HT1A
receptor-(Ile351)Gi1
spiperone functioned as an effective inverse agonist. This effect of
spiperone was not prevented by prior treatment of these cells with
pertussis toxin (Fig. 6A), demonstrating convincingly that the effect
of spiperone could not have been produced by interaction of the fusion
construct with endogenously expressed Gi family proteins. This confirmed that the constitutive GTPase activity must
result from intramolecular interactions between the GPCR and G protein
of the fusion protein. Furthermore, the effect of spiperone was shown
to represent a decrease in Vmax of the
intrinsic constitutive activity of this fusion protein (Fig. 6B).
Unlike the situation described above, pertussis toxin pretreatment
produced a substantial reduction in basal high-affinity GTPase activity in membranes expressing the 5-HT1A receptor
wild-type Gi1
fusion protein, a feature at
least consistent with constitutive activity of this construct. Addition
of spiperone to membranes expressing the 5-HT1A
receptor wild-type Gi1
fusion protein resulted
in a concentration-dependent inhibition of basal high-affinity GTPase activity with EC50 entirely in accord with that
reported previously for the isolated 5-HT1A
receptor (Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997a
). These observations, in
parallel with those of the other fusion proteins, confirmed the
constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type Gi1
fusion protein. Furthermore, as
the inverse agonist activity of spiperone was completely lacking in
membranes after pertussis toxin pretreatment, this indicates that the
effectiveness of agonist-independent (as well as agonist-induced)
interactions between the GPCR and G protein elements of the fusion
protein had been substantially reduced or ablated by attachment of
ADP-ribose to Cys351.
The current studies also bear comparison with the demonstration that a
fusion protein between the
2 adrenoceptor and
the long splice variant of Gs
displayed
greater constitutive activity than an equivalent fusion protein
containing the short splice variant of this G protein (Seifert et al.,
1998
). However, in the current case this alteration in measurable
constitutive activity is even more dramatic, resulting from a single
amino acid alteration in the G protein sequence. This provides a unique
example of regulation of GPCR constitutive activity.
Previous studies have shown that the 5-HT1A
receptor is able to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity. In cells
expressing the isolated 5-HT1A receptor
inhibition of forskolin-amplified activity by 80 to 90% could be
achieved with low concentrations of 5-HT. Pertussis toxin treatment
essentially attenuated this effect. It has previously been noted that
after stable expression of an
2A
adrenoceptor-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein agonists could mediate highly effective inhibition of
forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity in intact, untreated cells. However, after pertussis toxin treatment this effect was completely attenuated (Burt et al., 1998
). Such results argued that the fusion protein-linked G protein was unable to produce the
effect and that regulation of effector function reflected activation of
the endogenous Gi protein. In cells
expressing both the 5-HT1A
receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
and
-(Ile351)Gi1
fusion proteins, 5-HT was able to produce robust and
concentration-dependent inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl
cyclase activity. However, and in agreement with the lack of effect of
pertussis toxin on the capacity of 5-HT to activate high-affinity
GTPase in membranes from these cells, pertussis toxin had little effect
on agonist-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, the
ability of 5-HT to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity in cells
expressing the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
fusion protein was fully attenuated by pertussis toxin treatment.
Pertussis toxin-treatment was not able to fully attenuate agonist
stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity in cells expressing the
fusion protein containing the wild-type G protein (Fig. 4B). Although
this may initially appear surprising, these observations are entirely
in accord with previous studies on an
2A
adrenoceptor wild-type Gi1
fusion protein
(Carr et al., 1998
). Although the extreme C terminus of G protein
subunits is a key GPCR contact site it is clearly not the only one
(Bourne, 1997
; Hamm, 1998
). Therefore, although pertussis
toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of Gi-like
proteins appears to fully uncouple GPCRs from coexpressed but resolved
G proteins, now for two separate receptor systems, it is not sufficient
to fully eliminate agonist-mediated information transfer between the
two proteins given their enforced proximity in the fusion construction.
With this in mind it might then also be considered surprising that
pertussis toxin treatment resulted in a complete attenuation of
agonist-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. However, the lack of
signal amplification defined by the 1:1 molar ratio of GPCR and G
protein in the fusion protein means that high levels of fusion protein
expression are required to produce downstream signaling. Indeed in the
case of an A1 adenosine receptor-(Gly351)Gi1
fusion protein, agonist activation of mitogen-activated protein
kinase activity can be observed with high level of expression of the
construct but this is rapidly lost with diminishing levels of the
fusion protein (N. Bevan, A. Wise, G.M. and S. Rees, in preparation).
Furthermore, based on our analysis of the interactions between point
mutants of Gi1
at Cys351
and the
2A adrenoceptor, where greater
hydrophilicity both limited functional activation by agonist and moved
the response curve for agonist to higher concentrations (Bahia et al.,
1998
; Jackson et al., 1999
), it is not surprising that ADP-ribosylation
of the fusion protein at this position should have been observed to
reduce the potency of 5-HT to stimulate GTPase activity (Fig. 8).
However, it should also be noted that 5-HT displayed equivalent potency to stimulate the GTPase activity of the 5-HT1A
receptor(Gly351)Gi1
and the 5-HT1A receptor wild-type
Gi1
fusion proteins (Fig. 8) and thus
substitution of Cys351 by Gly in
Gi1
does not appear to be as deleterious to
agonist function at the 5-HT1A receptor as for
the
2A adrenoceptor (Bahia et al., 1998
;
Jackson et al., 1999
).
These studies have provided a wealth of information on the details of
interactions between the 5-HT1A receptor and
Gi1
, not least relating to the appearance and
detection of constitutive activity and inverse agonism. We predict that
further analysis of the pharmacology of regulation of these and related
fusion constructs will provide additional novel insights.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 1, 1999; Accepted June 24, 1999
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the European Union Biomed II program: Inverse agonism: Implications for drug design.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Graeme Milligan, Davidson Bldg., University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, United Kingdom. E-mail: g.milligan{at}bio.gla.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; MPPF, 4(2'-methoxy)-phenyl-1-[2'-(N-2"-pyridinyl)-p-fluorobenzamido]ethyl-piperazine; OH-DPAT, hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HEK, human embryonic kidney; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
determines the extent of activation by the
2A-adrenoceptor.
Biochemistry
37:
11555-11562[Medline].
2A adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein results in activation of both receptor- linked and endogenous G proteins: Comparisons of their contributions to GTPase activity and signal transduction and analysis of receptor-G protein activation stoichiometry.
J Biol Chem
273:
10367-10375
: Effects on
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein activation.
FEBS Lett
428:
17-22[Medline].
.
Mol Pharmacol
55:
195-201
2-adrenergic receptor-extending the ternary complex model.
J Biol Chem
268:
4625-4636
splice variants on
2 adrenoceptor-mediated signaling. The
2 adrenoceptor coupled to the long splice variant of Gs
has properties of a constitutively active receptor.
J Biol Chem
273:
5109-5116
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein.
FEBS Lett
419:
141-146[Medline].
when constrained within an
2A-adrenoceptor-Gi1
fusion protein.
Biochem J
325:
17-21.
2A-adrenoceptor and acylation minus forms of Gi1
by expressing the proteins from chimaeric open reading frames.
J Biol Chem
272:
24673-24678
G proteins following coexpression of receptor and G protein and expression of A1 adenosine receptor- Gi/o
fusion proteins.
Biochemistry
38:
2272-2278[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Hildebrandt Bring Your Own G Protein Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1079 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Takeda, T. Okada, M. Okamura, T. Haga, J. Isoyama-Tanaka, H. Kuwahara, and N. Minamino The Receptor-G{alpha} Fusion Protein as a Tool for Ligand Screening: a Model Study Using a Nociceptin Receptor-G{alpha}i2 Fusion Protein J. Biochem., May 1, 2004; 135(5): 597 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hiol, P. C. Davey, J. L. Osterhout, A. A. Waheed, E. R. Fischer, C.-K. Chen, G. Milligan, K. M. Druey, and T. L. Z. Jones Palmitoylation Regulates Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS) 16 Function: I. MUTATION OF AMINO-TERMINAL CYSTEINE RESIDUES ON RGS16 PREVENTS ITS TARGETING TO LIPID RAFTS AND PALMITOYLATION OF AN INTERNAL CYSTEINE RESIDUE J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19301 - 19308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Osterhout, A. A. Waheed, A. Hiol, R. J. Ward, P. C. Davey, L. Nini, J. Wang, G. Milligan, T. L. Z. Jones, and K. M. Druey Palmitoylation Regulates Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) 16 Function: II. PALMITOYLATION OF A CYSTEINE RESIDUE IN THE RGS BOX IS CRITICAL FOR RGS16 GTPase ACCELERATING ACTIVITY AND REGULATION OF Gi-COUPLED SIGNALING J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19309 - 19316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Molinari, C. Ambrosio, D. Riitano, M. Sbraccia, M. C. Gro, and T. Costa Promiscuous Coupling at Receptor-Galpha Fusion Proteins. THE RECEPTOR OF ONE COVALENT COMPLEX INTERACTS WITH THE alpha -SUBUNIT OF ANOTHER J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 15778 - 15788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Derrien, B. Zheng, J. L. Osterhout, Y.-C. Ma, G. Milligan, M. G. Farquhar, and K. M. Druey Src-mediated RGS16 Tyrosine Phosphorylation Promotes RGS16 Stability J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 16107 - 16116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Newman-Tancredi, D. Cussac, L. Marini, and M. J. Millan Antibody Capture Assay Reveals Bell-Shaped Concentration-Response Isotherms for h5-HT1A Receptor-Mediated Galpha i3 Activation: Conformational Selection by High-Efficacy Agonists, and Relationship to Trafficking of Receptor Signaling Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2002; 62(3): 590 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Welsby, E. Kellett, G. Wilkinson, and G. Milligan Enhanced Detection of Receptor Constitutive Activity in the Presence of Regulators of G Protein Signaling: Applications to the Detection and Analysis of Inverse Agonists and Low-Efficacy Partial Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2002; 61(5): 1211 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cavalli, K. M. Druey, and G. Milligan The Regulator of G Protein Signaling RGS4 Selectively Enhances alpha 2A-Adreoreceptor Stimulation of the GTPase Activity of Go1alpha and Gi2alpha J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2000; 275(31): 23693 - 23699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||