![]() |
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 4, 807-812, October 1999
Departments of Pulmonary Pharmacology (D.E.G., L.D.M., M.A.L., D.W.P.H.), Cardiovascular Pharmacology (S.A.D., Z.A., E.H.O.), Immunology (T.G.D.), Laboratory Animal Science (L.D.), and Renal Pharmacology (M.P., P.N.), SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of endothelin B (ETB) receptors in inflammation
and nociception was examined using ETB receptor knockout
mice. Genotyping studies were used with tissues from
ETB(+/+), ETB(+/
),
and ETB(
/
) mice to confirm the loss of
ETB receptors. Algesia induced by phenylbenzoquinone was
evident in the (+/+) mice, reduced by ~80% in the (+/
) mice, and
absent in the (
/
) mice. Phenylbenzoquinone-induced algesia in (+/+)
mice was inhibited 74% by the ETB receptor-selective antagonist A192621 (25 mg/kg p.o.), but unaffected by the
ETA receptor-selective antagonist SB 234551 (25 mg/kg
p.o.). Noninflammatory pain, induced by hotplate, was equivalent
between (+/+) and (
/
) mice. The cutaneous inflammatory response to
topical arachidonic acid (AA) also was evaluated. Whereas (+/+) mice
had a marked inflammatory response to AA, the (+/
), and (
/
) mice
had significantly reduced fluid phase responses (37 and 65%
inhibition, respectively). Neutrophil infiltration also was reduced in
the (+/
) and (
/
) mice (51 and 65% reduction, respectively).
Topical administration of A192621 (500 µg/ear) in (+/+) mice
inhibited AA-induced swelling (39%), whereas SB 234551 (500 µg/ear)
was without effect. Collectively, these results implicate the
ETB receptor in mediation of inflammatory pain and
cutaneous inflammatory responses in mice.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
endothelin isopeptides (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3) are a family of distinct
gene products with a broad distribution in both the central and
peripheral nervous systems that possess a multiplicity of biological
actions (for review, see Masaki et al., 1992
; Rubanyi and
Polokoff, 1994
). The most widely studied isoform, ET-1, was the
first member of the family identified, in 1988 (Yanagisawa et al.,
1988
). Although recognized initially for its potent vasoconstrictor activity, subsequent extensive research revealed an array of effects of
ET-1, and related ligands, in a variety of cells and tissues, and a
pathophysiological role for ET-1 has been proposed for several diseases
(Masaki et al., 1992
; Rubanyi and Polokoff, 1994
; Michael and
Markewitz, 1996
).
The effects of ET-1 are mediated by G protein-coupled,
seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors of which two major subtypes (ETA and ETB) have been
characterized pharmacologically and by molecular biologic techniques
(Hosoda et al., 1992
; Arai et al., 1993
). Many peptide and nonpeptide
antagonists for ET receptors have been identified, including the two
compounds used in the present study: SB 234551, a nonpeptide
ETA receptor-selective antagonist (Ohlstein et
al., 1998
), and A192621, a nonpeptide ETB
receptor-selective antagonist (Douglas, 1997
).
Several studies have provided evidence that ET-1 modulates inflammatory
processes (Rubanyi and Polokoff, 1994
; Michael and Markewitz, 1996
).
For example, ET-1 stimulates tumor necrosis factor-
, granulocyte
monocyte colony-stimulating factor, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-8
synthesis and release from monocytes (McMillen and Sumpio, 1995
);
enhances
-integrin expression; and activates neutrophils
(Lopez-Farre et al., 1993
; Elferink and de Koster, 1994
; Helset et al.,
1994
; Filep et al., 1995
). In addition, recent data suggest a role for
ET-1 in nociception. Thus, ET-1 and sarafatoxins 6c, the
ETB receptor-selective agonist (Williams et al.,
1991
), induced algesia in the mouse by a mechanism apparently distinct from those used by acetic acid and phenylbenzoquinone (PBQ) (Raffa et
al., 1996a
,b
). Furthermore, ET-1 has been suggested to be involved in
mediating formaldehyde (Formalin)-induced pain and inflammation in mice
(Piovezan et al., 1997
). It is unclear, however, whether these algesic
and inflammatory effects are mediated through actions at
ETA and/or ETB receptors.
The current study addressed this issue by investigating inflammation
and nociception in ETB receptor knockout mice
(Hosoda et al., 1994
). The results suggest a significant role for the
ETB receptor in mediating inflammation and
inflammatory pain in the mouse.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compounds and Reagents.
Arachidonic acid (AA) was obtained
from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO); PBQ from Eastman Kodak Co.
(Rochester, NY); and IRL-1620, sarafatoxin S6c, and ET-1 from American
Peptide (Sunnyvale, CA). 125I-ET-1 (specific
activity, 2200 Ci/mmol) was obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston,
MA). A192621 [(+/
)-trans,
trans-2-(4-n-propoxyphenyl)-4-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-[(2,6-dienthylphenyl) aminocarbonylmethyl]pyrrolidine-3-carboxylic acid and SB 234551 (E)-
-[[1-butyl-5-[2-[(2-carboxyphenyl)methoxy]-4-methoxyphenyl]-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]methylene]-6-methyoxy-1,3-benzodioxole-5-propanoic were synthesized in the Department of Medicinal Chemistry, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (King of Prussia, PA).
Animals.
BALB/c mice (18-20 g) were obtained from Charles
River Breeding Laboratories (Raleigh, NC). ETB
receptor knockout mice were obtained from an in-house colony originally
derived from heterozygous 129/Sv-Ednrbtm1Ywa breeding pairs obtained
from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and initially described by
Hosada et al. (1994)
and Puffenberger et al. (1994)
. All animals
were housed in a barrier facility and fed water and pellet food ad
libitum. Wild-type ETB receptor knockout mice
(+/+) and heterozygotes (+/
) appeared healthy and of normal lifespan
and were used in a weight range of 18 to 20 g except for a study
comparing weanlings (+/+) with adults, in which both sets of animals
were 6 to 14 g. The (
/
) mice were used at 6 to 14 g and
had a healthy appearance at the time of use. The (
/
) mice, however,
became ill with megacolon within several days after weaning. All
procedures used were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee and
met or exceeded standards of the American Association for the
Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, the United States Department
of Health and Human services, and all local and federal animal welfare
laws. All of the experiments described were terminal.
Genotyping and Characterization of ETB Receptor
Knockout Mice.
Individual genotype analysis was performed by
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using genomic DNA (0.2 µg) isolated
from tail snip samples, as described by Moore (1994)
. Amplification was performed in 50-µl aliquots (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.001% gelatin, 17 mM MgCl2, 200 nM diethylnitrophenyl
thiophosphate, 10% dimethylsulfoxide, 1.25 U Taq DNA
polymerase, pH 8.3; Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT) using neomycin-(280 base
pair (bp) amplicon; 0.75 µM 5'-CTT GGG TGG AGA GGC TAT TC-3') and
5'-AGG TGA GAT GAC AGG AGA TC-3') and ETB
receptor-(400 bp amplicon; 0.15 µM 5'-TTG CTC GCA GAG GAC TGG CCA-3'
and 5'-AAG CAT GCA GAC CCT TAG GGG C-3') specific primers.
Amplification used a "two-step" protocol consisting of primary
high-stringency amplification (11 cycles; annealing: 64°C, 45 s;
extension: 72°C, 45 s; denaturation: 95°C, 35 s),
followed by secondary low-stringency PCR (21 cycles; annealing: 58°C). Amplification of a single species of PCR product of 280 bp
(neomycin insert) or 400 bp (ETB receptor)
corresponded to a (
/
) or (+/+) genotype. Samples that generated a
(280/400 bp) doublet corresponded to a (+/
) genotype. Amplification
fidelity was confirmed by subcloning (pCR2.1 TA vector; Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and sequencing selected PCR products and by comparison with
coat color phenotype.
In Vitro Characterization of A19261 and SB 234511. Male BALB/c mice, 18 to 20 g (Charles River), were killed and exsanguinated. First- and second-generation pulmonary artery and trachea of each animal were removed and cleaned of adherent tissue. Two rings (~1 mm in diameter, 3-4 mm in length) were cut from the second- generation pulmonary artery and two rings (~2 mm diameter, 4 cartilage rings in length) were cut from the trachea. The endothelium of the pulmonary artery and the epithelium of the trachea were left intact. Tissues were put into modified Krebs-Henseleit solution (composition of the solution was 113.0 mM NaCl , 4.8 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1.2 MgSO4, 25.0 NaHCO3, and 11.0 dextrose), which was gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. Experiments were run in the presence of 1 µM meclofenamic acid. Individual tissues were suspended via stainless steel hooks and silk suture in 10-ml water-jacketed organ baths containing Krebs-Henseleit solution and connected to Grass FTO3C force-displacement transducers. Mechanical responses were recorded isometrically by MP100WS/Acknowledge data acquisition system (BIOPAC Systems, Santa Barbara, CA) run on Macintosh computers. The tissues were equilibrated under a resting tension of 0.35 g and washed with Krebs-Henseleit solution every 15 min for 1 h. After the equilibration period, pulmonary tissues were contracted with 10 µM phenylephrine and trachea with 10 µM carbachol until reaching plateau. Tissues then were rinsed every 15 min over 1 h until reaching baseline tone. The preparations then were left for at least 30 min before the start of the experiment.
ET-1 and S6c concentration-response curves were obtained by a cumulative addition of the agonist in half-log increments. Each concentration was left in contact with the preparation until the response plateaued before the addition of the subsequent agonist concentration. At the end of the experiment, tissues were exposed again to 10 µM phenylephrine or 10 µM carbachol, which served as a reference contraction for data analysis. Paired tissues were exposed to SB 234551 or A192621 (10 or 100 nM) or vehicle for 30 min before ET-1 cumulative concentration-response curves were generated.In Vivo Characterization
PBQ-Induced Hyperalgesia. Mice were given PBQ (2 mg/kg, i.p., at a dose volume of 0.01 ml/g) and placed in 4-liter beakers for observation. After a 5-min pretreatment time, the number of abdominal constrictions were recorded over a 10-min period. In studies examining the effects of antagonists, SB 234551 or A192621 or vehicle was administered p.o. 15 min before challenge with PBQ.
"Hotplate" Response.
A hotplate method for determination
of thermal pain threshold was modified from the procedure described
previously by Rubat and coworkers (1997)
. Each mouse was placed into a
4-liter beaker maintained at 54°C in a water bath and timed for their
response, which included hopping and/or paw-licking.
AA-Induced Pruritus. A topical dose of AA (2.0 mg/20 µl in cold acetone) was administered to the left ear of the mouse. Each mouse was placed in a 4-liter beaker for observation. After a 2-min pretreatment time, the number of ear rubs and head shakes were recorded over 10 min.
Cutaneous Inflammation Induced by AA.
Mice were administered
AA (2.0 mg of in 20 µl of cold acetone) to the left ear, and the
difference in ear thickness of the left ear versus right ear was taken
with an ear thickness gauge 1 h after AA administration. Mice then
were killed using carbon dioxide and the left ears harvested for
myeloperoxidase (MPO) analysis as described previously (Bradley et al.,
1982
). Results were recorded in cm × 10
3
and were analyzed using P57 software and linear regression.
Histology.
Normal and AA-exposed ear pinnae of (+/+),
(+/
), and (
/
) mice were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered
formaldehyde (formalin), and the samples processed to paraffin blocks.
Five micrometer-thick sections, cut from the base to apex of the
pinnae, were stained with Harris's hematoxylin and eosin Y (Sigma
Chemical Co.) and examined by light microscopy. Digital images were
captured with a Sony DKC-5000 digital photo camera (Sony Corp., Tokyo,
Japan) using Image-Pro Plus analysis (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
Statistical Analysis. Where appropriate, results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Student's t test or ANOVA where appropriate, with a probability value, p < .05, considered statistically significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characterization of Knockout Mice.
Three different genotypes
of mice derived originally from the ETB receptor
gene targeted disruption mice described by Hosada et al. (1994)
were
used for these studies.
Genotyping of Mice by PCR and Southern Blot Analysis.
PCR
amplification of genomic DNA samples resulted in the generation of a
single reaction product of either 400 bp (wild-type ETB receptor) or a 280 bp (neomycin insert)
corresponded to wild-type (+/+) and homozygous (
/
) knockout
genotypes, respectively (Fig. 1). In
contrast, samples that resulted in the simultaneous amplification of a
280 bp/400 bp doublet genotyped as heterozygous (+/
) mice. These
results were consistent with animal phenotype, i.e., agouti (+/+) and
(+/
) genotypes or piebald (
/
) genotype, coat color.
|
), and (
/
) indicated that ETB
receptor-specific ligands (sarafatoxin S6c, IRL-1620, and A192621)
displaced 125I-ET-1 in (+/+)- and (+/
)-derived
tissue but not in the (
/
)-derived membranes (data not shown).
Pharmacology of A192621 and SB 234511. To confirm that A192621 and SB 234511 antagonized ETB receptor- and ETA receptor-mediated responses, respectively, in mouse tissues, the effects of the compounds against ET-1-induced response in mouse pulmonary artery (ETA receptor-mediated) and sarafotoxin S6c-induced response in mouse trachea (ETB receptor-mediated) were investigated. SB 234551 (10 nM) potently inhibited ET-1-induced responses in mouse pulmonary artery with a pKB of 8.4, whereas A192621 (100 nM) was without effect. SB 234551 (100 nM) was without effect on sarafotoxin S6c-induced responses in mouse trachea. In contrast, A192621 (100 nM) produced a marked shift to the right in sarafotoxin S6c concentration-response curves with a pKB of 8.3 (data not shown).
PBQ-Induced Hyperalgesia.
As seen in Fig.
2, the algesic response to PBQ (2 mg/kg
i.p.) was clearly quantifiable in the wild-type controls, markedly reduced (~80%) in the (+/
) mice, and absent in the (
/
) mice; the responses among all groups were statistically significantly different from each other, as demonstrated by p < .05.
|
/
) mice as weanlings, because of
their short life-expectancy, a comparison was made between the response
to PBQ of (+/+) pups with that of the adult (+/+) mice. The number of
PBQ-induced abdominal constrictions in the (+/+) weanling mice
(16.4 ± 1.7; n = 5) was not different from that
of the adult (+/+) mice (17.2 ± 3.5, n = 5;
p > .05). These results indicate that there are no
age-related differences in the response to PBQ in (+/+) mice.
Noninflammatory Pain.
The profound deficit in the PBQ-induced
response in the ETB receptor gene-targeted
knockouts led to investigation of the possibility that nociceptors and
nerves carrying the pain signals might be developmentally and
functionally immature. This was conducted by evaluating the pain
threshold using a hotplate methodology. As seen in Table
1, the threshold response of the (
/
)
mice was not statistically different from that of the wild-type (+/+) control animals.
|
Pharmacology of PBQ Response.
The role of the
ETB receptor in inflammatory pain in wild-type
(+/+) mice also was explored pharmacologically using A192621. A192621
(25 mg/kg p.o.; 15 min pretreatment) strongly inhibited (74%) the
response to PBQ (2 mg/kg i.p.), compared with vehicle-treated mice. In
contrast, SB 234551 (25 mg/kg p.o.; 15 min pretreatment) was without
significant effect on the PBQ-induced response (Fig. 3).
|
Cutaneous Inflammatory Response to AA.
To explore further the
inflammatory deficit in ETB receptor
gene-targeted knockout mice, the pruritic and inflammatory responses to
topical application of AA were investigated. The pruritic response to
topical AA (2 mg/ear) was similar in the wild-type (+/+) and homozygous
(
/
) mice with equivalent episodes of scratching and rubbing (Table
2).
|
) mice (37 and 51%, respectively) and (
/
)
mice (~65% inhibition of both endpoints), compared with wild-type
animals. This inflammatory deficit also was demonstrable histologically
(Fig. 4). The wild-type controls had
appreciable tissue swelling and neutrophil infiltration of the dermis
(Fig. 4A), the (+/
) mice had reduced swelling and modest inflammatory
cell infiltration (Fig. 4B). In the case of the (
/
) mice, tissue
swelling was markedly reduced and neutrophils were seen only
occasionally and then only in the intravascular compartment (Fig. 4C).
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the present study strongly implicate the
ETB receptor as playing a role in inflammatory
pain and cutaneous inflammation in the mouse. The major findings in
support of this conclusion are:
| 1. | PBQ-induced algesia was reduced markedly (80%) in
heterozygous (+/ ) ETB receptor knockout mice
and absent in homozygous ( / ) animals, compared with wild-type (+/+) controls.
|
| 2. | The selective ETB receptor antagonist A192621 inhibited PBQ-induced algesia, whereas SB 234551, a selective ETA receptor antagonist, was without effect. |
| 3. | In heterozygous (+/ ) and homozygous ( / ) mice, there was
significant inhibition of topical AA-induced cutaneous inflammation and
neutrophil infiltration, compared with wild-type animals.
|
| 4. | A192621, but not SB 234551, inhibited topical AA-induced inflammatory responses. |
The findings of Raffa and coworkers (1996a
,b
) have suggested that
PBQ-induced writhing may involve, at least in part, ET-1 release. In
addition, ET-1-induced writhing may be mediated by both
ETA and ETB receptors.
Involvement of the ETA receptor was suggested by
the results showing that ETB receptor-selective
ligands were less potent than were ET-1 in causing algesia. However, in the presence of the ETA antagonist BQ-123, the
ETB receptor selective ligand ET-3 still induced
algesia, suggesting a role for the ETB receptor.
In the current study, alternative approaches were used to explore the
relative roles of ETA and
ETB receptors, namely, gene-targeted knockout
mice and ETB receptor-selective antagonism.
A PCR genotyping unequivocally identified all mice. It was clear that
the (+/+) mice had only the ETB receptor
amplicon, the (+/
) mice had both the ETB
receptor and the neomycin insert amplicons, and the (
/
) mice had
only the neomycin insert amplicon. These results are consistent with
the conclusion that the (+/+) mice have two alleles encoding for
ETB receptors, the (+/
) only one allele, and
the (
/
) mice have no alleles encoding for ETB receptors.
Radioligand-binding studies with ET-1 (which interacts with both
ETA and ETB receptors)
using brain tissue from (+/+), (+/
), and (
/
) also support the
conclusions from genotyping. Use of the ETB
receptor selective agonists sarafatoxin S6c and IRL-1620 as well as of
the ETB receptor selective antagonist A192621
clearly indicated a lack of 125I-ET-1 competitive
binding (presumably to the loss of the ETB receptor binding component) in the (
/
) mice, compared with the (+/+) mice. Recent results indicate that the relative ET receptor density in trachea from (+/+), (+/
), and (
/
) mice were 100:84:59, and that the ET-1 binding in the (
/
) mice was exclusively through the ETA receptor (R. Goldie, personal
communication). Thus, these data support the contention that the
heterozygotes have reduced ETB number and that
the ETB receptor is absent in the (
/
) mice.
Pharmacological assessment of the involvement of ET receptors in the
responses measured in this study was conducted using A192621 and SB
234511 as selective antagonists of the ETB and ETA receptors, respectively. Although A192621 and
SB 234511 have been suggested to be potent and selective antagonists
for ETB and ETA receptors (
Douglas, 1997
; Ohlstein et al., 1998
), to our knowledge there is no
published information on their binding and functional properties
against mouse ET receptors. It was determined that A192621 and SB
234511 potently antagonized ETB
receptor-mediated and ETA
receptor-mediated responses, respectively, in mouse pulmonary tissues,
inhibiting responses induced by sarafotoxin S6c in trachea (ETB receptor-induced) and ET-1 in pulmonary
artery (ETA receptor-induced). These data support
the use of A192621 and SB 234551 as appropriate tool compounds in this
species and suggest that any effects observed with these molecules in
mice in vivo can be attributed to antagonism of
ETB and ETA receptors, respectively.
The responsiveness of gene-targeted knockout mice was examined in
different models. The PBQ test is a classical model of inflammatory pain, which has been used widely to study the analgesic
properties of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Griswold et al.,
1991
). It was found that the (
/
) mice were unresponsive to PBQ,
suggesting that the ETB receptor is essential for
this response. In addition, the ability of A192621, but not of SB
234511, to inhibit PBQ-induced algesia provides additional evidence
that the ETB receptor is involved exclusively in
the inflammatory pain induced by this particular stimulus, with no
participation of ETA receptor activation. However, these results do not rule out a role for the
ETA receptor in other nociceptive processes and
pathways activated by other stimuli. The involvement of prostanoids, a
widely recognized component of the PBQ response (Griswold et al., 1991
)
is unlikely to be important with respect to the ET-associated response
since Raffa and coworkers (1996a)
demonstrated that ET-1 induced
writhing is primarily insensitive to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents.
The possibility exists that the diminution in the PBQ response in
nonwild-type mice is not the result of a reduction in the inflammation
per se. Thus, although in the current study thermal pain was not
reduced in the (+/
) or (
/
) mice, it is known that the pathways
for mediation of this pain would likely be distinct from the visceral
pain induced in the PBQ model. It is possible that distinct pain
pathways may be altered differentially in the knockout mice, which
could be manifest as differences in responsiveness to different stimuli.
It was of interest that the inflammatory deficits observed in
ETB receptor gene knockout extended to the skin
where the response to AA was clearly reduced. Expression of ET-1- and
ET-binding sites in skin predominantly occur in the dermis and are
associated with the microvasculature (Bull et al., 1991
). Inhibition of
the inflammatory response was supported by the histological findings, in which the (+/
) and (
/
) animals had reduced neutrophil
infiltration and tissue swelling. The AA-induced inflammatory response
is primarily driven by eicosanoids; more specifically, cysteinyl
leukotrienes and leukotrienes B4, with a minimal
contribution from prostanoids (Carlson et al., 1985
). Although some
studies have indicated that ET-1 is not able to stimulate leukotriene
production (Hay et al., 1993a
,b
), mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells
produce leukotrienes C4 on stimulation with ET-1
(Uchida et al., 1992
); the latter effect appeared to be mediated
through the ETA receptor (Egger et al., 1995
).
ET-1 also has been demonstrated to enhance neutrophil endothelial cell
adhesion (Hayasaki et al., 1996
). It remains to be clarified whether
ETB receptors mediate ET-1-induced neutrophil activation and adhesion. As in the case of PBQ-induced inflammatory pain, A192621 reduced the cutaneous inflammatory response (edema) to
AA, whereas SB 234551 was not effective. Although there was a trend
toward an effect of A192621 on AA-induced neutrophil infiltration, a
significant effect was not demonstrated. These results suggest that
tissue swelling may represent the more sensitive endpoint to
ETB receptor antagonism, and higher doses of
A192621 may be required to see marked inhibition of neutrophil
infiltration. Furthermore, the possibility exists that both
ETA and ETB receptors may
be involved in neutrophil-induced influx, and also activation, and that
antagonism of both receptor subtypes is required for a significant
effect on this parameter to be observed. A requirement for antagonism
of both receptor populations to produce significant inhibition of
ET-1-induced responses has been demonstrated in human bronchus
(Fukuroda et al., 1996
).
In summary, the current results suggest that ETB receptors are involved in inflammatory processes and cutaneous inflammation in the mouse. Thus, inflammatory pain, tissue swelling, and inflammatory cell infiltration all appear to involve ETB receptor activation. These data raise the possibility that strategies to interrupt this pathway, including ETB receptor antagonists, may provide novel therapeutics for the treatment of diseases involving inflammation and inflammatory pain. However, it will be important to confirm these results in mice in other species, particularly, in humans.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We gratefully acknowledge the work of Renee Hernandez in the care and handling of the knockout mice, and Stephanie Van Horn and Ganesh Sathe (Gene Expression Sciences, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals) for sequencing the pCR2.1 clones.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 1, 1999; Accepted July 16, 1999
Send reprint requests to: Douglas W. P. Hay, Ph.D., Department of Pulmonary Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 709 Swedeland Rd, King of Prussia, PA 19406-0939. E-mail: douglas_w_hay{at}sbphrd.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ET, endothelin; ETA, endothelin A receptor; ETB, endothelin B receptor; IL, interleukin-8; PBQ, phenylbenzoquinone; AA, arachidonic acid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; MPO, myeloperoxidase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. G. Chichorro, A. R. Zampronio, and G. A. Rae Endothelin ETB Receptor Antagonist Reduces Mechanical Allodynia in Rats with Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1136 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Motta, J. B. Calixto, and G. A. Rae Mechanical Hyperalgesia Induced by Endothelin-1 in Rats Is Mediated Via Phospholipase C, Protein Kinase C, and MAP Kinases. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1141 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Trentin, M. B. Fernandes, P. D'Orleans-Juste, and G. A. Rae Endothelin-1 causes pruritus in mice. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1146 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Balonov, A. Khodorova, and G. R. Strichartz Tactile Allodynia Initiated by Local Subcutaneous Endothelin-1 Is Prolonged by Activation of TRPV-1 Receptors. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1165 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Verri Jr., R. O. Molina, I. R. S. Schivo, T. M. Cunha, C. A. Parada, S. Poole, S. H. Ferreira, and F. Q. Cunha Nociceptive Effect of Subcutaneously Injected Interleukin-12 Is Mediated by Endothelin (ET) Acting on ETB Receptors in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2005; 315(2): 609 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Wahl, N. J. Goetsch, H. J. Young, R. J. Van Maanen, J. D. Johnson, A. S. Pea, and A. Brittingham Murine Macrophages Produce Endothelin-1 After Microbial Stimulation Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2005; 230(9): 652 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Verri Jr, I. R. S. Schivo, T. M. Cunha, F. Y. Liew, S. H. Ferreira, and F. Q. Cunha Interleukin-18 Induces Mechanical Hypernociception in Rats via Endothelin Acting on ETB Receptors in a Morphine-Sensitive Manner J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2004; 310(2): 710 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bagnato, L. Rosano, F. Spinella, V. Di Castro, R. Tecce, and P. G. Natali Endothelin B Receptor Blockade Inhibits Dynamics of Cell Interactions and Communications in Melanoma Cell Progression Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1436 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Yang, R. Gros, M. G. Kabir, A. Sadi, A. I. Gotlieb, M. Husain, and D. J. Stewart Conditional Cardiac Overexpression of Endothelin-1 Induces Inflammation and Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Mice Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 255 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Khodorova, M. U. Fareed, A. Gokin, G. R. Strichartz, and G. Davar Local Injection of a Selective Endothelin-B Receptor Agonist Inhibits Endothelin-1-Induced Pain-Like Behavior and Excitation of Nociceptors in a Naloxone-Sensitive Manner J. Neurosci., September 1, 2002; 22(17): 7788 - 7796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Davenport International Union of Pharmacology. XXIX. Update on Endothelin Receptor Nomenclature Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Pomonis, S. D. Rogers, C. M. Peters, J. R. Ghilardi, and P. W. Mantyh Expression and Localization of Endothelin Receptors: Implications for the Involvement of Peripheral Glia in Nociception J. Neurosci., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 999 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||