|
|
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 5, 917-925, November 1999
Division of Molecular Psychiatry, Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine and Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two novel cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) splice
variants were found by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
cloning by using mouse brain RNA as a template. One splice variant,
named
-14, lacks 14 nucleotides at the beginning of exon 9 of the
CREB
isoform. The other, named
-35, lacks 35 nucleotides at the
beginning of exon 8 of CREB
. These nucleotide deletions cause frame
shifts for codon usage, producing proteins which conserve the major
phosphorylation site (Ser133) but lack the basic/leucine
zipper domain, which is essential for binding to DNA and to other
transcription factors. Both variants are widely expressed in peripheral
tissues, but are enriched in brain, thymus, and testis. CREB
-14 and
-35 variant proteins were expressed by using an in vitro translation
system and by transfecting into human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Both
variants were detected by a CREB antibody that recognizes the CREB
amino terminus, but not by an antibody which recognizes the CREB
carboxy terminus, as would be predicted based on the frame shift.
Activation of the cAMP pathway increased phospho-CREB immunoreactivity,
indicating that these variants are substrates of cAMP-dependent protein
kinase. In addition, immunocytochemical analysis demonstrated
that CREB
-14 and
-35 are primarily cytosolic, whereas
CREB
is predominantly in the nucleus. Finally, expression of
CREB
-14 or
-35 decreased cAMP responsive element-chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase reporter activity, demonstrating that both can
function as repressors of endogenous CREB.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Various
extracellular signals such as neurotransmitters and hormones influence
cellular function by increasing the intracellular cAMP cascade. This
second messenger cascade includes activation of cAMP-dependent protein
kinase (PKA) and regulation of gene transcription via cAMP response
elements (CRE; Ziff, 1990
) in the promoter regions of target genes. The
CRE binding protein (CREB) mediates the action of the cAMP cascade on
gene expression (Hoeffler et al., 1988
; Yamamoto et al., 1988
; Gonzalez
and Montminy, 1989
). In addition to CREB, there are several other CRE
binding proteins that form the CREB/activating transcription factor
(ATF) family (Maekawa et al., 1989
; Hai and Curran, 1991
).
Phosphorylation of CREB at Ser133 by PKA
initiates CREB transactivation. Phosphorylated CREB binds to a
coactivator protein, CREB binding protein (Chrivia et al., 1993
), which
then binds to a transcription factor/RNA polymerase II complex, which
directly transactivates the target gene (Kwok et al., 1994
). The
Ser133 residue can be phosphorylated not only by
PKA, but also by other kinases, including CaM kinase II and IV (Dash et
al., 1991
; Matthews et al., 1994
), indicating that intracellular
elevation of calcium can also transactivate target genes via CREB. In
the CREB/ATF family the basic/leucine zipper (bZIP) motif in the C
terminus region is highly conserved. The bZIP motif is essential for
DNA binding and heterodimerization of the CREB/ATF proteins (Johnson and McKnight, 1989
). In addition, the bZIP domain is necessary for
translocation of CREB into the nucleus (Waeber and Habener, 1991
).
A study of the mouse CREB gene has revealed that it consists of 11 exons and multiple variants produced by alternative splicing (Cole et
al., 1992
; Ruppert et al., 1992
). Following that report, additional
splice variants of mammalian CREB have been identified, some of which
exhibit tissue specific expression (Waeber and Habener, 1992
; Ellis et
al., 1995
; Blendy et al., 1996
; Girardet et al., 1996
; Walker et al.,
1996
; Youg et al., 1997
). The major identified CREB isoforms,
,
,
and
(Ruppert et al., 1992
; Blendy et al., 1996
) have all of the
three domains which are essential for the transactivation function of
CREB, including a glutamine rich domain (Q domain), a kinase inducible
domain (KID domain), and a bZIP domain.
In contrast, some members of the CREB/ATF family have the bZIP domain
but lack the glutamine rich Q and kinase-inducible domains (KIDs), and act as repressors of CREB transactivation (Walker et
al., 1996
). Examples of these are the I-CREBs and ICER, an isoform of
cAMP response element modulator. In addition, CREB variants that lack
the bZIP domain also have been reported (Ruppert et al., 1992
; Waeber
and Habener, 1992
; Ellis et al., 1995
; Youg et al., 1997
; Bartsch et
al., 1998
), although the functional significance of these proteins is
still controversial. These variants are localized primarily to the
cytosol due to their lack of a bZIP domain (Waeber et al., 1991
;
Bartsch et al., 1998
).
CREB plays an important role in numerous cellular functions (Lalli and
Sassone-Corsi, 1994
). In the brain, CREB is reported to play a role in
circadian rhythm and formation of learning and memory (Ginty et al.,
1993
; Milner et al., 1998
). Furthermore, the function and expression of
CREB in specific brain regions has been implicated in the neuronal
adaptations or plasticity due to chronic psychotropic drug treatments
(Nibuya et al., 1996
); Duman et al., 1997
; Nestler and Aghajanian,
1997
). To further characterize the expression of CREB variants in the
brain, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cloning
of CREB variants was performed. Two novel splice variants, which are
predicted to lack the bZIP domain, but conserve the KID domain, were identified.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RT-PCR Cloning of CREB Variants.
Total RNA was extracted
from mouse brain (striatum) using the RNAquous kit (Ambion, Austin, TX)
according to the manufacture's standard protocol. A sense primer
(designated primer 8; Fig. 1) and an
antisense primer (designated primer 9; Fig. 1), which recognize exons 4 and 9 of the mouse CREB, respectively, were designed for RT-PCR. The
sequence of primer 8 was 5'-CAGTCTCCACAAGTCCAAACAGTT-3', and that for
primer 9 was 5'-GTAGAATGGTAGTACCCGGCTGA-3'. RT-PCR was carried out with
the striatal RNA as template by using the Access RT-PCR system
(Promega, Madison, WI), according to the manufacture's recommended
method. RT-PCR products of the primer 8-9 set were subjected to
agarose gel separation and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Several RT-PCR products of the predicted size [434 base pairs (bp) and
392 bp] of known variants (CREB
and CREB
) were observed. In
addition, several products of unpredicted size were also observed (data
not shown). These RT-PCR products were isolated by using a gel
extraction kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), subcloned into pGEM-T Easy
vector (Promega) and verified by sequencing. Two distinct plasmids,
encoding novel splice variants of the CREB
isoform, were isolated
and designated CREB
-14/8-9 and CREB
-35/8-9 (Fig. 1 and
Results).
|
RNase Protection Assay (RPA) of Splice Variants.
RNase
protection analysis was performed by RPAII kit (Ambion) according to
the manufacture's standard protocol, with total RNA extracts from
various mouse tissues as templates. The riboprobes were generated by
linearizing CREB
-14 or
-35 plasmids with NcoI and
32P-labeled using SP6 RNA polymerase (Boehringer Manheim,
Indianapolis, IN). Protected fragments were loaded onto an 8%
Acrylamide-TBE gel and the separated bands were detected by
autoradiography. Measurement and quantification of protected band
density were carried out by using the Macintosh-based NIH image
analysis program (version 1.52).
Subcloning of CREB Variants into Expression Plasmids for
Mammalian Cells.
To obtain the cDNAs encoding CREB
-14 or
-35
with initiation sites of CREB
isoform, another RT-PCR was
performed using primer set 6-7 (Fig. 1). The sense (6) and antisense
(7) primers were 5'-CTAAATGACCATGGAATCTGGAGCA-3' and
5'-AGTTACACTATCCACAGACTCCTG-3', respectively. RT-PCR products encoding
CREB
isoforms were identified based on their predicted size and
subcloned into a pGEM-T Easy vector (designated as CREB
/6-7). To
subclone CREB
14 or CREB
35 cDNA with the CREB
initiation site,
ExoRI/PleI fragments of CREB
/6-7 and PleI/EcoRI
fragments of CREB
14/8-9 or CREB
35/8-9, respectively, were
ligated into the ExoRI sites of the pCI plasmid, an expression plasmid
for mammalian cells with a CMV promoter. To subclone CREB
-14 and
-35 cDNA containing the CREB
initiation site into pCI (Promega), an expression plasmid for mammalian cells with a CMV promoter, EcoRI/PleI fragments of CREB
/6-7 and
PleI/EcoRI fragments of CREB
-14/8-9 and CREB
-35/8-9,
respectively, were ligated into the EcoRI site of pCI
plasmids.These plasmids were designated as CREB
-14 pCI and
CREB
-35 pCI, respectively.
-14 or CREB
-35 protein in
mammalian cells, PCR was performed using CREB
-14 pCI or CREB
-35
pCI as templates. The sense primer used was
5'-TTGAATT CATGACCATGGAATCTGGAGCA-3'. The antisense primers used for
CREB
-14 was 5'-TTGAATTCTTAGCCAGCTGTATTGCTCCT-3' and for CREB
-35
was 5'-TTGAATTCTCAATCCTTGGCACCCCTGTA-3'. These PCR fragments, which
contain the coding region of CREB
-14 or CREB
-35 isoforms, were
digested with EcoRI and subcloned into the EcoRI
site of pTB701 FL, an expression plasmid used to fuse the FLAG peptide
to the N terminus of the target protein (Kuroda et al., 1996
-14 FL and CREB
-35 FL,
respectively. All PCR products used were verified by sequencing after
the subcloning into pGEM-T Easy.
Cell Transfection and CAT Assay.
Human embryonic kidney
(HEK) 293 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium
containing 25 mM glucose, which was buffered with 44 mM NaHCO3 and
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, in a humidified atmosphere
containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. Transfection of
plasmids was performed by lipofection with TransIT-LT2 reagent (Panvera, Madison, WI), into subconfluent 293 cells (approximately 6 × 106 cells/10 cm dishes). For Western
blotting, cells were reseeded into two or three 10-cm dishes 16 h
after the transfection and were harvested 48 h later. For CAT
assays, 5 µg of CRE-CAT constructs (Montominy et al., 1986
) plus 15 µg of either CREB pCI variant or pCI vector alone plus 1 µg
pCMV-
gal (Promega) were cotransfected into 293 cells. Cells were
reseeded into six-well dishes (3.0 cm in diameter) 24 h after the
transfection. After the transfection, cells were allowed to settle on
the dishes (approximately 8 h after reseeding), then treated with
or without forskolin (5 µM; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO) for
16 h, and then the CAT assay was carried out by CAT enzyme assay
system (Promega) as described previously (Widnell et al.,
1996a
).
-galactosidase activity was simultaneously measured
by the
-galactosidase enzyme assay system (Promega) and CRE-CAT
activity was normalized to the
-gal activity.
Western Blotting, Immunocytochemistry and In Vitro
Transcription/Translation.
Transfected or untransfected cells were
washed and harvested with isotonic homogenate buffer (250 mM sucrose,
10 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris/HCl, 200 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.4), then lysed with RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.15 M
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 200 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 19,000 × g for 15 min. Supernatants were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Western blotting was carried out as described
previously (Takahashi et al., 1999
). For phospho-CREB immunoblotting,
cells were harvested after treatment with 50 µM forskolin for 10 min.
Phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM
Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF and 100 nM
calyculin A) were added to homogenates and RIPA buffer. Immunoblotting
for N- and C-terminal CREB was performed using polyclonal CREB (Upstate
Biotechnology Incorporated, Lake Placid, NY; 1:500 dilution) and
monoclonal CREB (X-12; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; 1:100
dilution) antibodies, respectively. Immunoblotting for phospho-CREB was
performed using polyclonal phospho-CREB antibody (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA; 1:500 dilution).
-14 pCI and CREB
-35 pCI as templates.
[35S]Methionine-labeled proteins were subjected
to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were detected by autoradiography.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sequence Analysis and Predicted Structure of Novel CREB Splicing
Variants.
By using RT-PCR and total RNA extracted from mouse
striatum as a template, we have isolated two cDNAs which encode novel
CREB splice variants. The primers used for RT-PCR were derived from the
nucleotide sequence of exons 4 and 9 of the mouse CREB gene (Fig. 1).
Both variants lack exon 5, suggesting that they are most closely
related to the CREB
isoform, which also lacks this exon. One splice
variant, referred to as CREB
-14, also lacks 14 nucleotides at the
beginning of exon 9, around the boundary of intron 8 and exon 9 (Fig.
1). Deletion of 14 nucleotides would result in a change of codon usage,
including termination of translation in exon 9. Based on this analysis
and the initiation site in exon 2, which is the same as that used for
CREB
and
isoforms, CREB
-14 is predicted to have 175 amino acids.
minus 35 (CREB
-35),
lacks 35 nucleotides at the beginning of exon 8, around the boundary of
intron 7 and exon 8 (Fig. 1). This deletion in CREB
-35 would also
cause a frame shift resulting in termination of protein translation in
exon 8. The predicted number of amino acids in CREB
-35 is 122, based
on the use of the same translation initiation site in exon 2 discussed
for CREB
-14 and the CREB
and
isoforms.
The splicing rule for acceptor and donor sites is kept in both
CREB
-14 and
-35 (i.e., the end of the deleted nucleotide sequence
in each case is "AG"; Fig. 1). In addition, both CREB
-14 and
-35 translated proteins are predicted to lack the bZIP domain, which
is encoded in exon 11, but would retain the conserved PKA phosphorylation site at Ser133 in exon 7.
Tissue Distribution of CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 Splice
Variants.
To characterize CREB
-14 and
-35 expression, we
analyzed levels of mRNA for each variant in different tissues.
Expression was determined by RPA with antisense riboprobes derived from
CREB
-14 or
-35 cDNAs, referred to as CREB
-14/8-9 and
CREB
-35/8-9, respectively. The predicted fragment size for each CREB
isoform in the RPA is summarized in Fig.
2A. As shown in Fig. 2B, CREB
-14 and
-35 are expressed in all tissues examined, although at different
levels, providing evidence for widespread distribution of both
variants. CREB
-14 and
-35 were found to be enriched in most brain
regions, particularly cerebellum, as well as in thymus and testis,
relative to other peripheral tissues; the CREB
and
isoforms are
also expressed at relatively high levels in these tissues. Both
variants are expressed at lower levels in the other tissues examined,
including lung, heart, liver, spleen, and kidney. Note that larger
amounts of total RNA were used for these latter tissues, due to lower levels of expression, to observe clear expression of the variants.
|
Expression of CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 Protein.
To
characterize the structural and functional properties of the CREB
variants, expression vectors for CREB
-14 and
-35 were prepared.
As described in Materials and Methods, RT-PCR was used to
isolate the 5' coding region of the CREB
isoform, including the
translation initiation start site, which was then subcloned separately
with each of the original RT-PCR products into a pCI expression
plasmid. Sequence analysis confirmed that the expression plasmids
contained the predicted 5' coding region, as well as the coding region
for each variant. CREB
-14 and
-35 were first expressed by using
an in vitro transcription/translation system under the control of T7
promoter. The CREB
-14 and
-35 proteins have molecular
masses of approximately 27 and 22 kDa, respectively (Fig.
3A).
|
-14 and
-35
proteins lack the bZIP domain at the C terminus. To determine whether
this is the case, antibodies specific to the amino and carboxy terminus
of CREB were used for immunoblot analysis of CREB
-14 and
-35
after transfection into HEK293 cells. As shown in Fig. 3B, CREB
-14
and
-35 proteins were detected by the CREB antibody, which
recognizes the amino terminus, but not by the antibody which recognizes
the carboxy terminus. The molecular masses of the CREB
-14 and
-35
were 27 and 21.5 kDa, respectively, similar to the sizes observed for
the products of the in vitro transcription/translation system.
One more prediction based on sequence analysis is that the
Ser133 phosphorylation site is conserved in both
CREB
-14 and
-35 (see Fig. 1). To determine whether this is the
case, a phospho-CREB specific antibody was used for immunoblot analysis
of the CREB
-14 and
-35. After transfection, HEK293 cells were
treated with forskolin to activate the cAMP-PKA signaling cascade, and
levels of phospho-CREB were determined. The phospho-CREB antibody is
directed against the Ser133 phosphorylation site
found in CREB and CREB related transcription factors, ATF1 and cAMP
response element modulator. As shown in Fig. 3C, forskolin treatment
increased levels of phospho-CREB immunoreactivity for bands of 27 and
21.5 kDa in cells transfected with CREB
-14 and
-35, but not in
cells transfected with vector plasmid alone. Forskolin treatment also
increased several immunoreactive bands of larger molecular weight that
correspond to the size of endogenous CREB and ATF-1 isoforms. These
phosphorylated bands were observed in both the CREB
-14 and
-35
transfected, as well as nontransfected, cells as expected.
To examine whether these two variants are expressed in native tissues
at the protein level, immunoblot analysis was conducted by using the
antibody that recognizes the N-terminus of CREB. As shown in Fig. 3D,
an immunoreactive band that comigrates with recombinant CREB
-14 or
-35 is seen in every brain region examined, as well as in
two peripheral tissues, demonstrating the presence of CREB
-14- and
-35-like proteins.
Localization of CREB
-14 and
-35 in Transfected Cells.
To
examine the localization of the CREB variants in transfected HEK293
cells, we constructed plasmids for expression of FLAG-tagged versions
of the CREB variants (referred to as CREB
-14FL and CREB
-35FL; see
Materials and Methods). We also transfected FLAG-tagged
CREB
cDNA (a gift from Dr. M.Greenberg, Harvard Medical School,
Cambridge, MA) as a control. FLAG immunocytochemistry was
performed in cells transfected with FLAG-CREB
-14, FLAG-CREB
-35
and FLAG-CREB
. In cells expressing either FLAG-CREB
-14 or
FLAG-CREB
-35, FLAG-immunoreactivity was seen predominately in the
cytosol and rarely in the nucleus (Fig.
4). These observations are consistent
with the prediction that the CREB variants are not translocated to the
nucleus because they lack the bZIP domain. In contrast, in cells
transfected with FLAG-CREB
, FLAG immunoreactivity was observed
largely in the nucleus, although immunoreactivity in the cytosol was
also observed (Fig. 4).
|
Effects of CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 on CRE-Reporter activity.
To study the functional characteristics of the CREB variants, we
cotransfected each with a CRE-CAT reporter construct into HEK293 cells.
Basal and forskolin-stimulated CRE-CAT activity was determined in the
cotransfected cells. Forskolin incubation (5 µM) increased levels of
CRE-CAT activity by more than 4-fold, relative to basal reporter
activity (Fig. 5). Overexpression of either CREB
-14 or
-35 repressed CRE-CAT activity (Fig. 5). The inhibitory effects of the CREB variants were more prominent on basal
CRE-CAT than on forskolin-stimulated activity (basal CRE activity:
100 ± 5.7;
-14, 43 ± 3.3;
-35, 31 ± 3.4;
forskolin-stimulated CRE-CAT activity: control, 444 ± 21;
-14,
341 ± 20; 
35, 319 ± 12; mean ± S.E.M. percentage
of control, basal CRE-CAT activity) (Fig. 5).
|
-14 or
-35
and the CRE-CAT constructs into HEK 293 cells (Fig. 5B). Both
CREB
-14 and
-35 dose-dependently repressed basal CRE-CAT
activity, but not forskolin-stimulated CRE-CAT activity.
CREB Variants Are Regulated in CREB-Overexpressing Transgenic
Mice.
The CREB gene contains a CRE, and previous studies have
demonstrated that activation of the cAMP system regulates the
expression of CREB isoforms (Widnell et al., 1994
). To determine
whether CREB
-14 and
-35 are also regulated by the cAMP system, we
examined the expression of these variants in CREB
-overexpressing
mice. We recently have developed inducible CREB
-overexpressing
transgenic mice by using the tetracycline-regulated system (Chen et
al., 1998
). In these mice, the tetracycline transactivator is under the
control of the neuron-specific enolase promoter and expression of
CREB
is under the control of the tetracycline-responsive promoter. Addition of tetracycline induces a conformational change in
tetracycline transactivator and thereby blocks its ability to activate
tetracycline-responsive promoter-CREB
expression (tetracycline-off
system). For these studies, we used one of the lines (6-B) that
exhibits high levels of CREB
overexpression in the striatum and
cerebellum (Chen et al., 1998
).
up-regulates endogenous CREB
and
isoforms (not shown). In the present study, the riboprobes used for analysis of CREB
-14 and
-35 do not
distinguish between these variants, but a clear increase of more than
400% in the combined levels of CREB
,
, and
isoforms was
observed in the transgenic mice (Fig.
6A). This is most likely largely due to
overexpressed CREB
, as well as up-regulation of CREB
and
.
Levels of CREB
-14 mRNA in the CREB
transgenic mice were reduced
to 81 ± 5% (mean ± S.E.M) of that in control mice. In contrast, CREB
-35 mRNA was up-regulated by 277 ± 13%
(mean ± S.E.M.) compared with control mice. These findings
demonstrate that CREB
-14 and
-35 are differentially regulated by
CREB
, and raise the possibility that expression of these variants
can be regulated by the cAMP system under physiological conditions.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have identified two novel CREB splice
variants, CREB
-14 and CREB
-35. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of several CREB isoforms as a result of alternative splicing (Waeber et al., 1991
; Ruppert et al., 1992
; Ellis et al.,
1995
; Blendy et al., 1996
; Girardet et al., 1996
; Walker et al., 1996
;
Youg et al., 1997
; Bartsch et al., 1998
). In most of these previous
reports, the CREB variants were generated by splicing out an entire
exon (Ruppert et al., 1992
; Youg et al., 1997
) or the insertion of a
novel exon (Waeber et al., 1991
; Ruppert et al., 1992
; Girardet et al.,
1996
; Bartsch et al., 1998
). The CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 variants
described in this study have a deletion of exon 5, similar to that in
the CREB
variant. In addition, CREB
-14 and
-35 also lack
several nucleotides at the beginning of exon 9 and 8, respectively,
indicating that they are novel CREB splice variants. This indicates
that CREB
-14 and
-35 are generated by recognition of alternative
intron-exon boundaries within these regions. In this regard, CREB
-14
and
-35 are similar to the
CREB
1 variant (Ellis et al., 1995
),
in which an insertion of several nucleotides was found at the beginning
of exon 7.
The sequence deletions in CREB
-14 and
-35 suggest an alternative
codon usage that would result in an early stop codon. This would result
in the formation of proteins with reduced molecular weight relative to
CREB
, and loss of the carboxy bZIP domain that is required for
dimerization and DNA binding. Expression by either a
transcription/translation system or transfection of HEK293 cells
demonstrates that CREB
-14 and
-35 have molecular masses of
approximately 27 and 22 kDa, respectively. In addition, deletion of the
bZIP domain in CREB
-14 and
-35 was directly demonstrated by
immunoblot analysis by using antibodies that selectively recognize the
amino or carboxy terminus of CREB. In cells overexpressing the CREB
variants, immunoreactivity against the amino, but not the carboxy,
terminus was observed, consistent with the sequence prediction. In
addition, immunocytochemical analysis of cells expressing FLAG-tagged
recombinant CREB
-14 and
-35 demonstrated that the variants were
localized primarily to the cytosol, with very low levels in the
nucleus, as would be predicted from the loss of nuclear localization
signals and the DNA binding domain.
In contrast to these deletions, both variants contain the
kinase-inducible domain located in exon 7, indicating that CREB
-14 and
-35 are substrates for phosphorylation by CREB kinases,
including PKA and CaMKII and IV. This was examined by immunoblot
analysis by using phospho-CREB specific antibodies. In the basal or
untreated cells, levels of phospho-CREB immunoreactivity were
undetectable. Stimulation of the cAMP cascade by incubation of cells
with forskolin resulted in high levels of a phospho-CREB bands of the
appropriate size in cells expressing either CREB
-14 or
-35 (i.e.,
27 or 22 kDa, respectively). These findings confirm that CREB
-14 and
-35 are substrates of PKA, and suggest that they are likely to be
substrates for other CREB kinases.
The functional characteristics of CREB
-14 and
-35 were also
examined by using a CRE-CAT reporter assay. Expression of either CREB
-14 or CREB
-35 repressed both basal and forskolin-stimulated CRE-CAT activity in transfected cells. In addition, the function of
recombinant CREB was also repressed by expression of the CREB variants.
Previous studies have reported two other CREB variants that, like
CREB
-14 or CREB
-35, lack the bZIP domain but retain the kinase
inducible, phosphorylation domain. These are the CREBw isoform in rat
(Waeber et al., 1991
) and the CREB1c isoform in Aplysia (Bartsch et
al., 1998
). The cellular localization of these isoforms in the cytosol
is similar to that found in the present study for CREB
-14 and
-35. However, one of these variants (CREBw) but not the other
(CREB1c) was reported to repress CRE-reporter activity (Girardet et
al., 1996
; Walker et al., 1996
; Bartsch et al., 1998
). This discrepancy
could be explained by different experimental conditions or expression efficiency.
The mechanism by which CREB
-14, CREB
-35, and CREBw inhibit
endogenous CREB function is not clear. Because these variants lack the
bZIP domain they can not dimerize or bind to DNA to inhibit CREB
function. The most likely mechanism for the inhibition is that these
variants may act as pseudosubstrates of PKA in the cytosol and thereby
decrease the phosphorylation of endogenous CREB in the nucleus. The
question remains as to whether endogenous expression of these isoforms
is at a level that is sufficient to repress CREB function under
physiological conditions. CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 are widely
expressed in all tissues that were examined, and were particularly
enriched in brain, thymus, and testes. Moreover, CREB
-35 mRNA
appears to be abundant and is expressed at high levels relative to the
other major CREB isoforms, CREB
,
, and
. Expression of
immunoreactive bands of the appropriate molecular weight were also
observed, indicating that CREB
-14 and
-35 are expressed at the
protein levels. In addition, the finding that CREB
-35 is
up-regulated in CREB transgenic mice suggests that expression of this
isoform may serve a negative feedback role for the cAMP system. These
findings raise the possibility that CREB
-35, as well as CREB
-14,
could influence CREB function in vivo. Alternatively, these isoforms
may have other, unidentified functions in the cytosol that are
regulated by phosphorylation. This possibility is supported by studies
demonstrating that CREB
is present in developing dendrites (Crino et
al., 1998
) and in mitochondria (Cammarota et al., 1999
).
Yet another possibility is that CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 may be
aberrant splice variants that are repressed under physiological conditions. This has been demonstrated for other aberrant splice variants that are associated with human disease (Nakai and Sakamoto, 1994
). For example, the pathogenesis of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis recently was determined to result, in part, from
aberrant RNA processing of a glutamate transporter (EAAT2; Lin et al., 1998
). In this regard, the CREB
-14 and CREB
-35 variants could be
involved in the regulation of the cAMP-CREB signaling pathway under
pathological conditions. Further examination will be needed to
determine the function of the CREB
-14 and
-35 variants in normal
physiological signaling, and possibly in aberrant conditions.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 23, 1999; Accepted July 29, 1999
This work is supported by U.S. Public Health Services Grants MH45481 and MH25643.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Ronald S. Duman, Department of Psychiatry, Ribicoff Research Facility, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park St., New Haven, CT 06508. E-mail: ronald.duman{at}yale.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; CRE, cAMP response elements; CREB, cAMP responsive-element binding protein; HEK293, Human embryonic kidney 293 cells; KID, kinase-inducible domain; ATF, activating transcription factor; CMV, cytomegalovirus.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ito, Y. Hozumi, F. Sakane, S. Saino-Saito, H. Kanoh, M. Aoyagi, H. Kondo, and K. Goto Cloning and Characterization of Diacylglycerol Kinase {iota} Splice Variants in Rat Brain J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23317 - 23326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lou and R. F. Gagel Alternative Ribonucleic Acid Processing in Endocrine Systems Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2001; 22(2): 205 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||