|
|
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 5, 982-988, November 1999
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The association of lead with chromatin in cells suggests that
deleterious metal effects may in part be mediated through alterations in gene function. To elucidate if and how lead may alter DNA binding of
cysteine-rich zinc finger proteins, lead ions were analyzed for their
ability to alter the DNA binding mechanism of the
Cys2His2 zinc finger protein transcription
factor IIIA (TFIIIA). As assayed by DNase I protection, the interaction
of TFIIIA with the 50-bp internal control region of the 5S ribosomal
gene was partially inhibited by 5 µM lead ions and completely
inhibited by 10 to 20 µM lead ions. Preincubation of free TFIIIA with
lead resulted in DNA-binding inhibition, whereas preincubation of a
TFIIIA/5S RNA complex with lead did not result in DNA-binding
inhibition. Because 5S RNA binds TFIIIA zinc fingers, this result is
consistent with an inhibition mechanism via lead binding to zinc
fingers. The complete loss of DNase I protection on the 5S gene
indicates the mechanism of inhibition minimally involves the N-terminal fingers of TFIIIA. Inhibition was not readily reversible and occurred in the presence of an excess of
-mercaptoethanol. Inhibition kinetics were fast, progressing to completion in ~5 min. Millimolar concentrations of sulfhydryl-specific arsenic ions were not inhibitory for TFIIIA binding. Micromolar concentrations of lead inhibited DNA
binding by Sp1, another Cys2His2 finger
protein, but not by the nonfinger protein AP2. Inhibition of
Cys2His2 zinc finger transcription factors by
lead ions at concentrations near those known to have deleterious
physiological effects points to new molecular mechanisms for lead
toxicity in promoting disease.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Xenobiotic
metals such as cadmium, arsenic, and lead can induce a variety of
adverse physiological responses in rodents and humans, including
carcinogenesis, reproductive and developmental defects, nephropathies,
and neuropathies (Goyer, 1996
). These effects are thought to be
mediated through metal ion-protein interactions of a variety of
cellular targets; in some cases, the metal ions are complexed with
certain proteins in detoxification mechanisms (Goyer, 1983
, 1984
). To
aid in risk assessment and to help elucidate the biochemical mechanisms
for adverse effects of metal ions on biological systems, it is
important to identify potential protein targets for their toxic action
and elucidate underlying inhibitory mechanisms, including concentration
dependence and kinetics. Because cysteine amino acids in proteins are
highly reactive to electrophilic metal ions, proteins containing such
residues are proposed to be primary targets for metal ions, especially
those in the heavy-element category (Thomas and Wofford, 1983
).
An important class of cysteine-rich proteins is the regulatory factors
that contain Cys2His2
zinc-binding domains first identified in transcription factor IIIA
(TFIIIA) and referred to as "zinc fingers" (Hanas et al., 1983
;
Miller et al., 1985
). TFIIIA binds the internal control region (ICR) of
the 5S ribosomal RNA gene and activates 5S RNA synthesis by RNA
polymerase III (Engelke et al., 1980
). Cysteine-rich zinc finger
proteins are proposed to be cellular targets for many xenobiotics, including metal ions, and are possibly responsible for carcinogenic effects of metal ions (Sunderman and Barber, 1988
).
Mechanistic effects of arsenic and cadmium ions on zinc finger
structure were previously examined in two structurally and functionally
distinct proteins, the steroid hormone receptor and transcription
factor IIIA (Simons et al., 1990
; Predki and Sarkar, 1992
; Hanas and
Gunn, 1996
). Both of these proteins are prototypes of transcription
factor superfamilies. Members of the hormone receptor family contain
two Cys2Cys2 zinc-binding
domains and members of the TFIIIA superfamily contain various numbers
of Cys2His2 zinc-binding
domains. Divalent metal ions such as cadmium and arsenic ions display
increased avidity for two closely spaced thiols in a vicinal
orientation (Joshi and Hughes, 1981
). Arsenic(III) was found to inhibit
both hormone and DNA-binding functions of the estrogen receptor (Simons
et al., 1990
). Significantly, micromolar amounts of arsenic inhibited
hormone binding and millimolar amounts inhibited DNA binding. The
micromolar sensitivity to arsenic for hormone binding is indicative of
the disruption and necessity of a vicinal thiol arrangement for this
function. Cadmium ions at micromolar amounts were found to be
nondetrimental to the DNA binding function of the steroid hormone
receptor and could replace zinc in the finger structure with no loss of
function (Predki and Sarkar, 1992
). Micromolar concentrations of
cadmium ions were found to inhibit the DNA binding mechanism of the
prototypical Cys2His2 zinc
finger protein, TFIIIA (Hanas and Gunn, 1996
).
Lead is the most common metal in the environment that has known adverse
effects on biological systems. Normal blood lead levels in children and
adults measure in the 0.1 to 0.2 µM range (Pirkle et al., 1994
).
Although this level is still high, it has decreased ~5-fold from the
mid-1970s. Children and neonates are especially sensitive to lead
effects because they absorb significantly more of ingested metal than
adults. Blood lead levels in the 0.5 to 5 µM range are known to have
deleterious effects on nervous, renal, and reproductive tissue and the
metal is a known carcinogen in rodents (Goyer, 1996
). At the cellular
level, lead accumulates in cell nuclei and associates with nuclear
proteins and chromatin (Hitzfeld and Taylor, 1989
). The presence of
lead in the nucleus could result in adverse effects on gene function if
lead ions at low concentrations are capable of having deleterious
effects on gene regulatory proteins. Alterations in gene expression
could be manifested in developmental, reproductive, and carcinogenic effects of the metal, which are known to occur in animals (Johnson, 1998
). It is therefore important to mechanistically determine if lead
ions can have deleterious effects on gene expression in general and on
gene regulatory proteins in particular and at what concentrations. In
the present study, mechanistic effects of metal ions on zinc finger
proteins are extended by investigating lead interactions with TFIIIA
and transcription factor Sp1, another Cys2His2 finger protein
that binds GC-rich regions in RNA polymerase II promoters (Kadonaga et
al., 1987
).
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of TFIIIA.
Immature ovarian tissue was removed
from anesthetized 4- to 5-cm female Xenopus laevis frogs
(Nasco Biologicals, Fort Atkinson, WI) and homogenized briefly in
buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). This homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000g and aliquots were layered onto 15 to 30% v/v
glycerol gradients in the buffer A. These gradients were centrifuged
for 24 h at 34,000 rpm in a Beckman SW41 rotor; all manipulations
were performed at 0-4°C. The 7S particle complex containing TFIIIA
and 5S ribosomal RNA sedimented slightly faster than the 5S hemoglobin
molecule and was identified by UV absorption. The ribonucleoprotein
particles were further purified to 90% homogeneity by
diethylaminoethyl cellulose ion exchange chromatography as described
previously (Hanas et al., 1983
) 5S RNA was removed from TFIIIA by
digestion of the 7S particle (20 µg/ml) with RNase A (10 µg/ml) in
buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 320 mM KCl, 2 mM
MgCl2, 0.4 mM DTT, 0.1% v/v Nonidet P-40
detergent (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min at
room temperature and then placed on ice. Protein concentration was
determined by the method of Bradford with bovine serum albumin as a
standard (Bradford, 1976
).
Transcription Factor-DNA-Binding Reactions.
A 303-bp DNA
insert containing the 120-bp Xenopus borealis somatic 5S
ribosomal RNA gene was 32P end-labeled on the
coding strand by digesting a pT7 plasmid containing the insert with
BamHI followed by alkaline phosphatase removal of the 5'
phosphates. After removal of alkaline phosphatase by phenol-chloroform
extraction, the 5' ends were rephosphorylated with polynucleotide
kinase and [
-32P]ATP. The end-labeled
plasmid was then ethanol precipitated, digested with EcoRI
to excise the insert, and the 303-bp end-labeled fragment was purified
on a 6% w/v polyacrylamide gel. The specific activity of the DNA
insert was determined by absorbency at 260 nm and Cerenkov counting. To
study the effects of xenobiotic metal ions on TFIIIA function, TFIIIA
in buffer B is diluted 5-fold in buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH. 7.6, 70 mM NH4Cl, 7 mM MgCL2, 0.2 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% v/v nonionic detergent Nonidet P-40) and
incubated at room temperature with lead chloride (Aldrich Chemical Co.
Wilwaukee, WI), sodium arsenate, or sodium arsenite (both purchased
from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at the concentrations and times
indicated in the figure legends. TFIIIA was then diluted (20-fold) to
10 mM in the same buffer minus the lead, end-labeled 5S gene was added
to a final concentration of 1 nM (~104 cpm),
and the binding reaction (20 µl) took place for 15 min. DNA-binding
reactions with transcription factors Sp1 and AP2 (obtained from Promega
Life Sciences, Madison, WI) were performed in similar fashion
with the template simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter DNA end-labeled
according to the vendor's instructions.
DNase I Protection Assays.
DNase footprint analyses to
identify specific DNA-protein interactions were performed in accordance
with a previously described procedure (Galas and Schmitz, 1978
).
Briefly, DNase I was added to the binding reactions to a final
concentration of 1 to 2 µg/ml and incubated for an additional minute
at room temperature. The digestion was terminated by addition of 100 µl of stop buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS,
30-µg sonicated salmon sperm DNA/ml). The DNA was
ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in 4 µl of formamide solution
(20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 95% deionized formamide, 1 mM EDTA, 0.01%
xylene cyanol and bromphenol blue), heated at 95°C for 5 min, and
then electrophoresed through a 7 M urea-7% w/v polyacrylamide gel
until the xylene cyanol marker migrated two-thirds down the gel. The
gel was then transferred to blotting paper, dried, and subjected to
autoradiography overnight at
70°C exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs).
For EMSAs
(Yoshinaga et al., 1989
), TFIIIA treated with RNase A in buffer B was
diluted 5-fold in buffer D (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 75 mM KCl, 2.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1% v/v Nonidet
P-40, 5% glycerol), and incubated at room temperature with lead
chloride or zinc chloride at the concentrations indicated in the figure
legend. The TFIIIA was then diluted to 10 mM in the same buffer minus
the metals, end-labeled 5S gene and poly dI-dC (Sigma Chemical Co.)
were added to a final concentration of 1 nM and 1 µg/ml,
respectively, and the binding reaction (20 µl) took place for 15 min.
The samples were then electrophoresed for 1 h at 250 V on a
preelectrophoresed 6% w/v polyacrylamide gel (60:1 w/w
acrylamide/bis-acrylamide) in buffer E (90 mM Tris-HCl, 90 mM boric
acid, pH 7.9). The gel was transferred to blotting paper and subjected
to autoradiography overnight at
70°C exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibition of TFIIIA-DNA Interactions by Lead Ions.
In a
protein-dependent DNA EMSA, exposing TFIIIA to increasing
concentrations of lead ions (10-30 µM Pb2+)
inhibited the ability of the protein to bind to and retard the mobility
of the 32P end-labeled 5S gene fragment as
evidenced by the autoradiogram in Fig.
1A. The faster mobility of the unbound
DNA bands in lanes 3 to 5 is evident compared with that in lane 2 (the
positive control) where TFIIIA binding to the 5S gene has slowed the
electrophoretic mobility of the end-labeled DNA; the negative control
reaction containing end-labeled DNA but no TFIIIA was electrophoresed
in lane 1. Significantly, inhibition of the TFIIIA-dependent mobility shift was not observed with treatment of the factor with the same concentrations of zinc ions (Zn2+, lanes 3-5,
Fig. 1B). To examine the concentration dependence of the lead
inhibition more closely, the DNase I protection assay was used, which
allows a "visualization" of the specificity and location of the
TFIIIA binding event on the 5S gene (Fig.
2). TFIIIA in this assay binds to and
protects from DNase digestion a large surface on the 5S gene, from
nucleotides +43 to +96, relative to the +1 start site of transcription
(lane 2); in the absence of TFIIIA binding, DNase 1 readily nicks this
area of the gene as evidenced by the large number of
[32P]DNA fragments in this region (lane 1).
Exposing TFIIIA to concentrations of lead ions <10 µM results in
significant loss of DNase I protection (lane 4, 5 µM); lower
concentrations of lead ions result in slight inhibition (lane 3, 2.5 µM). The inhibition of TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection occurs
over the entire factor-binding region, from +43 to +96 on the 5S gene
where all nine zinc fingers of TFIIIA interact. It is noted that the
DNase I protection and EMSA DNA-binding reactions contain 0.2 mM
-mercaptoethanol and 0.5 mM DTT respectively; these reagents are
necessary for TFIIIA activity. These excess thiol groups may bind lead
ions, thus increasing the lead concentration necessary for TFIIIA
inhibition. We have observed that it takes higher lead concentrations
to see complete TFIIIA inhibition in the EMSA than in the DNase I
protection assay. This may be due in part to the use of 0.5 mM DTT in
the EMSA.
|
|
Time Course of Lead Inhibition of TFIIIA Binding.
The
inhibition of TFIIIA function by lead ions is taking place before the
DNA binding assay as TFIIIA is first exposed to the lead ions and then
diluted ~20-fold into the DNA binding assay. In addition, the
inhibition is taking place in the presence of an excess of thiol
reagent. These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of the lead
ions on TFIIIA structure is not readily reversible. In the experiments
depicted in Figs. 1 and 2, TFIIIA was exposed to the various
concentrations of lead ions for 20 min at room temperature before
assaying for DNA binding, which takes place in an additional 15-min
incubation. To elucidate the time course of this inhibition, a kinetic
analysis of lead exposure was performed to gain additional information
about the inhibition mechanism; a rapid inhibition would suggest a
direct and specific interaction with lead on TFIIIA. TFIIIA was
pretreated with lead ions for various times before addition to the DNA
binding reaction, which was shortened to 1 min. Figure
3 is an autoradiogram that illustrates this kinetic analysis of the DNA-binding inhibition as assayed by DNase
I protection. Very slight lead inhibition of TFIIIA-dependent DNase I
protection is observed at the 1-min lead exposure time point (lane 4)
and substantial inhibition is observed at the 2.5-min and 5-min time
points (lanes 5 and 6). The loss of DNase I protection at 5 min is
about the same as at 20 min (lane 8). This rapid inhibition is
consistent with a direct binding mechanism between lead ions and
TFIIIA.
|
Lead Ions Inhibit TFIIIA Zinc Finger Structure.
Although zinc
fingers comprise three fourths of the TFIIIA structure (30 kDa out of
40-kDa total mass), nonfinger regions could possibly be involved in
this lead inhibition. TFIIIA zinc fingers bind 5S RNA in a mechanism
competitive with 5S gene DNA (Hanas et al., 1984
). The TFIIIA-5S RNA
complex is referred to as the 7S ribonucleoprotein particle.
Previously, cadmium ions were shown to inhibit TFIIIA only upon direct
exposure to the free protein but not when the protein was bound to 5S
RNA in the 7S particle. This result is consistent with an inhibitory
mechanism in which the cadmium ions were directly binding the TFIIIA
zinc fingers (Hanas and Gunn, 1996
). A similar experiment was performed with lead ion inhibition of TFIIIA in the present study, which is
exhibited in the autoradiogram in Fig. 4.
Lanes 4 and 5 are control TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection patterns
in the presence and absence of 7S particle-specific 5S RNA,
respectively; note the lack of TFIIIA binding is observed in the
presence of 5S RNA (no DNase I protection from nucleotides +43 to +96,
lane 4) but not in the absence of 5S RNA (lane 5). This result
indicates the 5S RNA is preventing the TFIIIA zinc fingers from binding
the 5S gene. Lanes 6 and 7 exhibit the same experiment although with initial exposure of the 7S particle to 30 µM lead ions; the same result is observed as in lanes 4 and 5. This demonstrates that the 7S
particle-specific 5S RNA was able to protect the TFIIIA from lead ion
inhibition as evidenced by DNA binding after removal of the 5S RNA by
RNase digestion (lane 7). The positive controls for TFIIIA binding and
lead inhibition of binding are in lanes 2 and 3, respectively.
|
|
Millimolar Concentrations of Arsenic Do Not Inhibit TFIIIA Binding
to 5S Gene.
Arsenic, mercury, and zinc also exhibit specificity
for binding thiols in proteins. Specific DNA binding by TFIIIA is
inhibited by micromolar concentrations of cadmium (Hanas and Gunn,
1996
) and lead but not by zinc (Fig. 1B). Micromolar amounts of mercury were previously found not to be inhibitory for TFIIIA (Hanas and Gunn,
1996
). Because arsenite is highly selective for binding to protein
vicinal thiols and was found to inhibit the estrogen receptor
transcription factor (Simons et al., 1990
), this compound was tested
for inhibition of TFIIIA. Figure 6
exhibits the DNase I protection patterns in the presence of TFIIIA
exposed to increasing concentrations of arsenate (A) or arsenite (B).
In both cases, no inhibition of TFIIIA binding is observed even at very
high arsenic concentrations (2 mM, lane 5). It is noted that these arsenic concentrations inhibit the DNase I enzyme as evidenced by the
reduction in 32P banding intensities in lanes 4 and 5 compared with the negative and positive controls (lanes 1 and 2).
Although zinc ions in the 10- to 30-µM range do not inhibit
TFIIIA-dependent gel shift ability (Fig. 1), zinc ions in the
concentration range used in this arsenic analysis do inhibit
TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection (data not shown).
|
Micromolar Concentrations of Lead Ions Inhibit DNA Binding by
Transcription Factor Sp1 But Not AP2.
DNA binding by the
Cys2His2 zinc finger
transcription factor Sp1 in a crude cell extract was previously shown
to be inhibited by millimolar levels of lead ions (Zawia et al., 1998
).
It was necessary therefore to determine what lead concentration range may inhibit a purified recombinant form of this protein. Figure 7A is an autoradiogram of the effects of
increasing micromolar lead ion concentrations on the ability of the
zinc finger protein Sp1 to bind the SV40 viral DNA promoter region as
assayed by DNase I protection. Inhibition of Sp1 DNA binding (loss of
DNase I protection) is observed at 10 and 25 µM lead ion (lanes 4 and
5) but not at 5 µM (lane 3). Significant lead inhibition of TFIIIA
binding was observed at 5 µM (Fig. 2A). As a control, the ability of
lead ions to inhibit the DNA binding ability of a nonzinc finger
protein, AP2, is exhibited in Fig. 7B. AP2 is an RNA polymerase II
enhancer binding protein that regulates differential gene expression
(Williams et al., 1988
). No inhibition of AP2 binding to either
demarcated binding site on the SV40 promoter region is observed at the
5 to 25 µM lead ion level in Fig. 7B (lanes 3-5) or at higher lead concentrations in the 50- to 100-µM range (not shown).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The amino acid sequence of Xenopus TFIIIA revealed a
structure of nine repetitive domains beginning near the amino terminus of the protein, each of ~30 amino acids with two cysteines and two
histidines for zinc binding; these domains were termed "zinc fingers" (Ginsberg et al., 1984
; Miller et al., 1985
). Significantly, human TFIIIA has an identical overall zinc finger structure and function to frog TFIIIA (Drew et al., 1995
; Ogilvie and Hanas, 1997
).
Mammalian genomes are estimated to contain at least 1000 distinct genes
coding for TFIIIA-type
Cys2His2 zinc finger
proteins (Berg and Shi, 1996
). The role of zinc in TFIIIA-type proteins is to hold the finger in the proper conformation for DNA interactions because removal of zinc by chelation, as was first demonstrated for
TFIIIA, results in a protein conformational change and loss of specific
DNA binding (Hanas et al., 1988
). In addition, single amino-acid
changes via site-directed mutagenesis in the zinc coordination sphere
of TFIIIA fingers also led to loss of specific DNA binding (Smith et
al., 1991
). These two results demonstrated that structural alterations
in the zinc coordination spheres of TFIIIA-type zinc fingers can
significantly disrupt the DNA binding mechanism. Chemical agents such
as electrophilic xenobiotics that interact with cysteine residues are
potential disrupters of zinc finger structure and function. Previous
work demonstrated that micromolar amounts of cadmium were able to
disrupt zinc finger function in TFIIIA (Hanas and Gunn, 1996
).
Cadmium and arsenic ions have selective affinity for closely spaced
thiol groups where they can bind one metal ion (Simons et al., 1990
).
This mechanism may exist for lead as well because at 5 to 10 µM,
these ions were found to inhibit TFIIIA zinc finger structure (Fig. 2).
The sensitivity and the speed of that inhibition (5 min, Fig. 3) may
result from direct interaction with a vicinal orientation of thiols in
the zinc finger structure. Such an orientation is known to exist in the
crystallographic structure of TFIIIA-type zinc fingers (Pavletich and
Pabo, 1993
). However, excess exogenous zinc ions do not reverse
the lead inhibition (Fig. 5) so a simple competitive inhibition model
does not appear to hold. It is of interest that even millimolar
concentrations of arsenite do not inhibit TFIIIA zinc fingers (Fig. 6).
This surprising result suggests that the overall finger structure may
determine which metal ions can gain access to its zinc coordination
sphere. This differential access is likely to be true when comparing
zinc finger proteins from different structural families such as TFIIIA
and the steroid hormone receptors that have
Cys2Cys2 metal coordination
spheres. For example, arsenite inhibits steroid hormone receptor DNA
binding (Simons et al., 1990
) but not TFIIIA binding (Fig. 6). Within members of the TFIIIA superfamily, sensitivities to xenobiotic metals
may be similar because lead ions were shown to inhibit the
Cys2His2 transcription
factor Sp1 in a similar although slightly higher micromolar
concentration range (Fig. 7A). DNA binding by Sp1 also is sensitive to
micromolar amounts of cadmium ions (data not shown). An important
control experiment in these xenobiotic metal experiments is the
observed lack of lead inhibition of the transcription factor AP2 (Fig.
7B). The amino acid sequence of this protein reveals no cysteine-rich
finger motifs (Williams et al., 1988
). In addition, AP2 DNA binding is
not sensitive to cadmium ion inhibition at micromolar concentrations
(data not shown).
The DNA binding mechanism of TFIIIA was previously shown to involve
three groups of three fingers each, with the N-terminal group binding
the C-box at the 3' end of the ICR, the middle group binding the M-box
or intermediate element in the middle of the ICR, and the C-terminal
group binding the A box at the 5' end of the ICR. (Hanas et al., 1989
).
In vitro mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that disruption of the
zinc coordination spheres either by changing individual amino acids or
by amino acid deletions caused differences in DNA-binding inhibition,
depending upon which group of fingers was mutated (Hanas et al., 1989
;
Smith et al., 1991
). Mutation of the middle or C-terminal finger groups
still allowed the N-terminal group to afford DNase I protection of the C-box region. However, mutation of the N-terminal group resulted in
complete inhibition of DNase I protection over the entire ICR (+43 to
+96) by the middle and C-terminal groups as well as by the N-terminal
group. Therefore, the complete inhibition of TFIIIA-dependent DNase I
protection by lead ions along the entire ICR (Fig. 2) indicates that
the lead ions are minimally altering the structure of the N-terminal
group of fingers. If just the middle or C-terminal fingers were
affected, DNase I protection of the C-box region should have been
observed and was not. With respect to lead inhibition of Sp1 binding,
this protein has three
Cys2His2 zinc fingers and all appear to be inhibited because no partial DNase I footprint is
apparent (Fig. 7A).
The family of Cys2His2 zinc
finger factors is the largest known protein superfamily in living
systems (Henikoff et al., 1997
). Different TFIIIA-type
Cys2His2 zinc finger
proteins vary in their finger number, structure, and DNA binding
specificity (Berg and Shi, 1996
). This family of proteins is only found
in eukaryotes and their number and complexity have increased during
evolution. Although the precise functions of most of these proteins are
not known, their nucleic acid binding potential suggests they have roles in regulating gene expression, signal transduction, cell growth
and differentiation, and/or chromosome structure. Lead ions are known
to accumulate in cell nuclei where they interact with chromatin and
other nuclear proteins (Hitzfeld and Taylor, 1989
). The micromolar
sensitivity to lead, the rapid inhibition kinetics, and other molecular
information obtained from this present work on TFIIIA and Sp1 increase
the likelihood that members of the
Cys2His2 family of cellular
zinc finger proteins are at risk for lead toxicity in cell nuclei in
vivo. Higher organisms have evolved cysteine-rich metallothionein
proteins to act as xenobiotic cellular "mops," possibly to protect
critical cysteines in
Cys2His2 regulatory factors
as well as in other proteins. However, as the environmental load of
such xenobiotics is increased above levels found in nature, cellular
defense mechanisms may become limiting. This scenario could result in
increased incidence of lead-related genetic diseases (Johnson, 1998
).
Our results with TFIIIA and Sp1 suggest that these as well as related
cysteine- and histidine-rich regulatory proteins involved in
transcription and signal transduction are potentially at risk in vivo,
especially at low concentrations of lead that can be further
concentrated in the cell nucleus. If such factors are involved in
regulating transcription responsible for normal cell growth or
differentiation for example, their inhibition by lead could result in
abnormal cell growth. Lead is known to induce cancers in animal models
(Goyer, 1996
). Therefore, in these models, lead may be acting as an
epigenetic tumor promoter inducing cell proliferation as opposed to
acting simply as a DNA mutagen. Zinc fingers should be included as
targets in possible mechanisms of lead-induced disease processes.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank M. Tillman and T. Pugh for the excellent technical assistance and R. J. Hanas for critically reading the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 15, 1999; Accepted August 2, 1999
1 Current address: Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University, 430 Life Sciences West, Stillwater, OK 74074.
This work was supported by a grant from the Environmental Protection Agency (R 826273-01-0).
Send reprint requests to: Jay S. Hanas, Ph.D., Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, 800 Research Pkwy., Room 448, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. E-mail: Jay-Hanas{at}ouhsc.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
TFIIIA, transcription factor A for RNA polymerase III; Cys2, two cysteine amino acids; His2, two histidine amino acids; ICR, internal control region; S, sedimentation constant; DNase I, deoxyribonuclease I; RNase A, ribonuclease A; SV40, simian virus 40; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Taupeau, J. Poupon, D. Treton, A. Brosse, Y. Richard, and V. Machelon Lead Reduces Messenger RNA and Protein Levels of Cytochrome P450 Aromatase and Estrogen Receptor {beta} in Human Ovarian Granulosa Cells Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 1982 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. I. Lidsky and J. S. Schneider Lead neurotoxicity in children: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates Brain, January 1, 2003; 126(1): 5 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Li and T. G. Rossman Genes Upregulated in Lead-Resistant Glioma Cells Reveal Possible Targets for Lead-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2001; 64(1): 90 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||