|
|
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 6, 1198-1206, December 1999
Institute of Chemical Toxicology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glucocorticoid-inducible hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase (SULT2-40/41)
gene transcription was investigated in primary cultured rat
hepatocytes transiently transfected with a series of SULT2-40/41 5'-flanking region-luciferase reporter constructs, with emphasis on
examining the functional role of an inverted repeat-0 nuclear receptor
motif (IR0). Treatment of transfected cultures with any of four
glucocorticoids activated luciferase expression from a construct
containing 1938 base pairs (bp) of the SULT2-40/41 gene 5'-flanking
sequence, whereas deletion of bp
227 to
158 (containing the IR0
motif) largely abolished the effect. On closer analysis, treatment of
hepatocyte cultures with either of the potent glucocorticoids dexamethasone [strong cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) inducer] or triamcinolone acetonide (weak CYP3A inducer) produced dose-dependent increases in luciferase activity when hepatocytes were transiently transfected with a construct containing as little as 158 bp of 5'-flanking sequence or containing a mutated IR0 motif. The
dexamethasone dose-dependent increase in luciferase activity continued
through a dose of 10
6 M when the transfected construct
contained the IR0 motif, but was maximal at 10
7 M when
the transfected construct lacked the IR0 motif. In contrast, triamcinolone acetonide-induced luciferase activity was maximal at a
dose of 10
7 M, irrespective of the presence or absence of
the IR0 motif. Coincubation of transfected hepatocytes with
10
8 M dexamethasone and the antiglucocorticoid RU486
inhibited luciferase expression. Luciferase induction by the
prototypical CYP3A inducer pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile was
restricted to constructs containing the IR0 motif. These data suggest
that glucocorticoid-inducible SULT2-40/41 gene expression occurs
through a dual mechanism, whose components possibly involve the
glucocorticoid receptor and the pregnane X receptor.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
hydroxysteroid sulfotransferases (SULT2) play critical roles in drug
metabolism, bile acid detoxication, and carcinogen activation, and in
the regulation of intratissue active hormone levels. Therefore,
understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate the expression of
this multigene family is important. SULT2 enzymes catalyze the
sulfonation of a wide range of sulfate acceptor molecules such as
hydroxysteroid hormones, bile acids, aliphatic alcohols, procarcinogens
such as 5-hydroxymethylchrysene, and other endogenous and exogenous
compounds (Jakoby et al., 1980
; Barnes et al., 1989
; Ogura et al.,
1990b
). Depending on the stability of the sulfate ester that is
formed, SULT2-catalyzed reactions may culminate in the creation of a
polar end product that is amenable to excretion and elimination
(detoxication) or in the bioactivation of a procarcinogen to a highly
reactive intermediate. Moreover, because sulfated hormones are
generally considered to be receptor inactive, alterations in SULT2 gene
expression have the potential to shift the balance of intratissue
active hormone levels and affect gene expression.
In a broad-based search for hepatic genes that undergo altered
expression during aging, Roy and coworkers cloned two rat senescence marker protein genes, SMP2A and SMP2B (Song et al., 1990
), that were
later identified as sulfotransferase genes of the SULT2 family (Ogura
et al., 1990a
; Watabe et al., 1994
). Age- and gender-related expression
of the rat hepatic SULT2 gene family has long been recognized as a key
feature of these enzymes and strongly suggests that hormonal regulation
is central to SULT2 gene expression. Throughout adult life, the SULT2
enzymes are more abundantly expressed in female compared with male rat
liver (Runge-Morris and Wilusz, 1991
; Chatterjee et al., 1994
). As male
rats surpass puberty, SULT2 gene expression declines in response to
rising androgen levels and produces an androgenizing effect on hepatic
gene expression (Chatterjee et al., 1990
, 1994
). Temporal fluctuations
in androgen (Chatterjee et al., 1987
, 1990
, 1994
) and pituitary growth
hormone concentrations (Yamazoe et al., 1989
; Ueda et al., 1997
) have both been implicated to influence SULT2 gene expression, and we have
found that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, an
"environmental hormone" with pleiotropic effects on gene
expression, also produces alterations in rat hepatic SULT2 mRNA levels
(Runge-Morris, 1998
).
Insights into the mechanisms responsible for SULT2 gene regulation are
just beginning to emerge. Although the three known SULT2 enzyme
isoforms that are present in rat liver (SULT2-40/41, -20/21, and -60)
appear to have similar substrate specificities, they are independently
regulated in response to steroid hormone (Liu and Klaassen, 1996
) and
xenobiotic treatments (Runge-Morris et al., 1998
). Among the SULT2
isoforms, SULT2-40/41, which is expressed in vivo and in primary rat
hepatocyte culture, has been best characterized. A recent analysis of
the SULT2-40/41gene 5'-flanking region revealed that direct androgen
receptor-DNA interactions are unlikely to be responsible for
androgen-mediated repression of SULT2-40/41gene transcription and that
the octamer transcription factor-1 (Oct-1), hepatic nuclear factor 1 (HNF1), and CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) transcription
factors figure prominently in the control of liver-specific SULT2-40/41
gene expression (Song et al., 1998
).
Glucocorticoids and steroidal "antiglucocorticoids" such as
pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile have been shown to induce SULT2-40/41 mRNA levels in rat liver (Liu and Klaassen, 1996
). Regulation of SULT2
gene expression by glucocorticoids appears to share some features with
steroid-inducible cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) expression, including
dose-response relationships that continue increasing beyond
physiological glucocorticoid doses (Schuetz and Guzelian, 1984
; Schuetz
et al., 1984
; Runge-Morris et al., 1996
). In liver, steroid-inducible
CYP3A is transcriptionally controlled via a cis-acting
ATGAACT direct repeat sequence in the 5'-flanking region of the gene
(Quattrochi et al., 1995
). This direct repeat sequence, which also can
be viewed as the complement of a DR3 nuclear receptor motif
(i.e., a direct repeat of the hexanucleotide
AGG/TTCA, in which the two
halves of the repeat are separated by three bases), is a binding site
for the pregnane X receptor (PXR), a novel member of the nuclear
receptor superfamily (Kliewer et al., 1998
). The SULT2-40/41 gene
contains an ATGAACT "half-site" at base pair (bp)
184 to
178,
which also can be considered as part of an imperfect inverted repeat-0
nuclear receptor motif (IR0) (i.e., an inverted repeat of the
aforementioned hexanucleotide, in which the two halves of the repeat
are separated by zero bases). DNase I footprinting analysis suggested
that this IR0 site may play a role in regulating SULT2-40/41 gene
expression (Song et al., 1998
). In the present study, transient
transfection analyses were conducted in primary cultured rat
hepatocytes to identify which regions of the SULT2-40/41 gene are
responsible for conferring glucocorticoid-inducible transcriptional
activation, with particular emphasis on examining the functional
significance of the IR0 motif.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
Steroids (dexamethasone, triamcinolone acetonide,
betamethasone, hydrocortisone, and pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile)
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Custom-synthesized oligonucleotides were purchased from Genosys (The
Woodlands, TX). Other supplies and reagents were obtained from the
sources described previously (Runge-Morris et al., 1996
; Kocarek et
al., 1998
).
Preparation of Reporter Constructs.
A fragment of the
SULT2-40/41gene spanning bp
1938 to +52 was prepared by polymerase
chain reaction amplification, using Pfu polymerase
(Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA), rat genomic DNA as template, and
primers corresponding to bp 36 to 55 and 2022 to 2005 [5'-GGACGCGTAATGTTCAACATCCTTATCA-3' and
5'-GGCTCGAGCTCTGTGTAGGTCCTGT-3'; an Mlu I site
and a XhoI site (shown underlined) were added to the 5' ends
of the forward and reverse primers, respectively] of the published
SULT2-40/41 gene (GenBank accession no. M29301). The amplified fragment
was ligated into the Mlu I and XhoI sites of the
pGL3-basic (Promega Biotec, Madison, WI) firefly luciferase reporter
plasmid (construct 1938) and sequenced completely. There were single
base pair differences between our SULT2-40/41 clone and the published
sequence, and the sequences were identical between bp
629 and +52. A
construct containing the 1938-bp 5'-flanking sequence, but lacking the
70-bp fragment delimited by PstI sites at
227 and
158
(construct
PstI), was prepared by performing a complete
PstI digestion of the 1938 construct, and ligating closed
the digested plasmid. Constructs containing 227 bp or 158 bp of
5'-flanking sequence (constructs 227 and 158) were prepared by first
performing a complete digestion of the 1938 construct with
KpnI (in the pGL3-basic multiple cloning site, 5' of the SULT2-40/41insert) followed by a partial digestion with
PstI, and blunt-ending and ligating closed the digested
plasmid. Constructs containing 77 bp or 34 bp of 5'-flanking sequence
(constructs 77 and 34) were prepared by polymerase chain reaction
amplification, with construct 1938 as template. These amplified
fragments were initially ligated into the pGEM-T vector (Promega
Biotec), and were subsequently subcloned into the Mlu I and
XhoI sites of pGL3-basic. A construct containing a
mutagenized ATGAACT motif (construct IR0-Mut) was prepared with
the Altered Sites II in vitro mutagenesis system (Promega Biotec)
according to manufacturer's instructions. The mutagenic primer
sequence (corresponding to bp
199 to
164) was
5'-TTCTGTTTGGGGGTCAactAgTTGGGCTCACAAAT G-3', in which the ATGAACT motif (the corresponding location in the mutagenic primer is
underlined; base changes are shown in lowercase letters) was changed to
contain a unique SpeI restriction site (ACTAGT), to facilitate the identification of mutant clones. A construct lacking the
IR0 motif (construct
IR0) was prepared by replacing the 70-bp PstI fragment of the 1938 construct with a 58-bp
double-stranded oligonucleotide lacking the IR0 sequence. The
downstream PstI site of this oligonucleotide was changed to
GTGCAG to facilitate the identification of a forward orientation clone
following ligation. Sequences of all constructs were verified by
sequence analysis (Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics DNA
Sequencing Facility, Wayne State University).
Transient Transfection and Treatment of Primary Cultured Rat
Hepatocytes.
Isolation, primary culture, and transient
transfection of rat hepatocytes were performed essentially as described
previously (Kocarek et al., 1998
). Hepatocytes were isolated
from the livers of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (220-300 g) and
plated in standard medium, consisting of Williams' medium E
supplemented with 0.25 U/ml insulin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, onto Vitrogen- (The Collagen Corporation, Palo
Alto, CA) coated 12-well plates (3 × 105
hepatocytes/well). At ~21 h after plating, culture medium was replaced with 0.6 ml of Opti-MEM containing a premixed complex of 5.5 µg of Lipofectin reagent (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY) and 0.8 µg
of reporter plasmid, in combination with 0.08 µg of the pRL-TK
plasmid (Promega Biotec), which expresses the Renilla luciferase under the control of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter, to allow for normalization among samples due to
differences in transfection efficiency. Transfection incubations were
continued for 5 h, after which culture medium was replaced with
standard Williams' medium E for 2 h. Culture medium was then aspirated, and hepatocytes were overlaid with 0.8 mg of Matrigel (Collaborative Research Products, Bedford, MA). After incubating the
cultures at 37°C for 30 min to allow for Matrigel gelation, standard
culture medium (1 ml) was added to each well, and cultures were
incubated overnight. Alternatively, following the transfection incubation, 1 ml of standard medium was added to each well, and 100 µg of Matrigel was pipetted into the medium. These two methods of
Matrigel addition were equally effective in restoring steroid responsiveness to the hepatocyte cultures. At 48 h after plating, fresh medium, either alone or containing steroid [or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle, 0.1% final medium concentration], was added
to each well. After 24-h treatment, hepatocytes were harvested for
measurement of luciferase activity (firefly and Renilla)
with the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Biotec),
according to the manufacturer's instructions, and a Dynex model MLX
luminometer. In preliminary experiments, with a plasmid expressing
-galactosidase under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter,
transfection efficiency of the primary cultured rat hepatoctyes was
estimated to be ~5%. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by
the Newman-Keuls post hoc test. ED50 values and
95% confidence intervals were estimated by fitting dose-response data
to a sigmoidal function, with Prism (version 2) software (GraphPad
Software, San Diego, CA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether the first ~2 kilobases of the SULT2-40/41
gene 5'-flanking region contained sequences conferring glucocorticoid inducibility, and to obtain preliminary information on whether the
ATGAACT/IR0 motif (hereafter referred to simply as the IR0 motif)
located upstream of bp
184 may be involved in any
glucocorticoid-mediated effects, primary cultures of rat hepatocytes
were transiently transfected with a lucerifase reporter construct
containing 1938 bp of SULT2-40/41 5' sequence (1938 construct), or with
a deletion construct containing the same sequence but lacking the 70-bp
fragment delimited by PstI sites at
227 and
158 bp
(
PstI construct) (Fig. 1).
Forty-eight hours after plating, the transfected hepatocytes were
treated for 24 h with medium alone, DMSO vehicle, or with one of
the following potent glucocorticoids: dexamethasone (at 10
7 or 10
5 M),
triamcinolone acetonide (10
5 M), betamethasone
(10
5 M), or hydrocortisone
(10
5 M) (Fig. 1). Relative to untreated or
vehicle-treated controls, glucocorticoid treatment significantly
induced luciferase reporter gene expression in the 1938-bp SULT2-40/41
5'-luciferase construct (each steroid induced luciferase activity at
least 15-fold at the 10
5 M dose) (Fig. 1A). The
higher dose of dexamethasone (10
5 M) produced a
1.9-fold greater degree of induction from the 1938-bp construct
compared with the lower dose of dexamethasone
(10
7 M) (significant at p < .05). In contrast, deletion of the 70-bp PstI fragment
containing the IR0 motif (
PstI), markedly blunted glucocorticoid inducibility of the construct because the maximal increase observed following glucocorticoid treatment was 6-fold (Fig.
1B).
|
To examine the glucocorticoid-mediated activation of the SULT2-40/41
gene more thoroughly, and the functional significance of the IR0 motif
more directly, primary rat hepatocyte cultures were transiently
transfected with a series of SULT2-40/41 5'-luciferase reporter
constructs, and complete dose-response relationships for the
glucocorticoid inducibility of reporter gene expression were determined
(Figs. 2 and
3). The test constructs (see Fig. 2 for
representations of the constructs) included two plasmids that contained
the intact IR0 motif (the 1938 construct and 227, containing 227 bp of
5'-flanking sequence), two plasmids that lacked the IR0 motif (the
PstI construct and 158, containing 158 bp of 5'-flanking
sequence), and one plasmid that contained 1938 bp of SULT2-40/41
5'-flanking region, but a mutagenized ATGAACT motif (IR0-Mut
construct). In these experiments, transiently transfected hepatocytes
were treated for 24 h with either dexamethasone, a potent
glucocorticoid and efficacious inducer of CYP3A (Fig. 2), or with
triamcinolone acetonide, a potent glucocorticoid that is a relatively
ineffective CYP3A inducer (Fig. 3) (Schuetz and Guzelian, 1984
; Kocarek
and Reddy, 1998
). Each steroid was delivered at doses ranging from
10
9 to 10
5 M. Consistent with the results described in Fig. 1, treatment with
dexamethasone or triamcinolone acetonide produced a dose-dependent increase in luciferase activity in hepatocytes transfected with the
1938 construct (Figs. 2A and 3A), and this induction was markedly attenuated in hepatocytes transfected with the
PstI
construct (Figs. 2B and 3B). Glucocorticoid inducibility of luciferase
activity was only slightly diminished in hepatocytes transfected with
the 227 construct compared with that occurring in hepatocytes
transfected with the 1938 construct, suggesting that sequences upstream
of bp 227 were relatively unimportant for glucocorticoid inducibility (Figs. 2C and 3C). However, substantial glucocorticoid inducibility (albeit lower than that observed in hepatocytes transfected with the
1938 or 227 construct) was retained in hepatocytes transfected with the
158 construct or the IR0-Mut construct (Figs. 2,
D and E and 3, D and E). Thus, glucocorticoid
treatment induced luciferase expression irrespective of whether the
transfected construct contained an intact IR0 motif. Comparable
dexamethasone-inducible effects on SULT2-40/41 gene transcription were
observed when primary cultured female hepatocytes were transfected with
the 1938,
PstI, or 158 construct (data not shown).
|
|
Upon closer inspection of the data, differences were observed among the
dose-response relationships that were obtained in hepatocyte cultures
transfected with the SULT2-40/41 constructs that either contained or
lacked the IR0 motif. Luciferase activity was maximal at a
dexamethasone dose of ~10
7 M when the
SULT2-40/41 construct lacked an intact IR0 motif [i.e., constructs
PstI, 158, and IR0-Mut (Fig. 2, B, D, and E)], but continued to increase through a dexamethasone dose of
10
6 M when the construct contained the IR0
motif [i.e., constructs 1938 and 227 (Fig. 2, A and C)]. Thus, after
transfection with either of the two IR0-containing constructs, the
luciferase activity measured in hepatocytes treated with
10
6 M dexamethasone was at least 30% greater
[i.e., 30.8% greater for the 1938 construct and 51.5% greater
(p < .05) for the 227 construct] than that measured
in cultures treated with 10
7 M dexamethasone
(Fig. 2, A and C). In contrast, the largest increase in luciferase
activity that was measured at 10
6 compared with
10
7 M dexamethasone treatment in hepatocytes
transfected with a construct lacking an intact IR0 motif was 12.6%
(Fig. 2E).
In addition, when sigmoidal functions were fit to the dexamethasone
dose-response data, the ED50 values that were
calculated for hepatocytes transfected with constructs containing the
IR0 motif (i.e., 18.1 and 41.1 nM for constructs 1938 and 227, respectively) were greater than the upper 95% CL that were calculated
for the hepatocytes transfected with the constructs lacking the IR0
motif, with the exception of the
PstI construct, which
gave a relatively flat dose-response relationship and wide confidence
interval (Table 1). Likewise, the
ED50 values for the IR0-lacking constructs were
smaller than the lower 95% CL for the IR0-containing constructs. In
comparison, the dose-dependent increases in luciferase activity that
were produced by triamcinolone acetonide were maximal at 10
8 to 10
7 M,
irrespective of the presence of the IR0 motif (Fig. 3). Thus, with one
exception, the ED50 values for triamcinolone
acetonide-induced luciferase expression from the SULT2-40/41 constructs
ranged from 1.98 to 6.52 nM and were comparable to the
ED50 values obtained for dexamethasone-induced
expression from the IR0-lacking constructs (Table 1). An outlying
ED50 value was calculated for the
PstI construct, which again gave a very low response and
wide confidence interval (Table 1). For the 158 construct, the response
occurring after treatment with 10
5 M
triamcinolone acetonide, which was significantly greater than the
response observed after treatment with 10
6 M
triamcinolone acetonide (Fig. 3D), was excluded from the analysis because an increased response at the 10
5 M dose
was not reproduced in a subsequent experiment (data not shown).
Collectively, these data suggest that dexamethasone, which is not only
a potent glucocorticoid but also an efficacious inducer of CYP3A,
activates expression of the SULT2-40/41 gene through both a low dose-
and a high dose-mediated component, whereas triamcinolone, which is a
potent glucocorticoid but a relatively ineffective CYP3A inducer,
activates SULT2-40/41 expression only through the low-dose component.
Although these analyses do not resolve the low- and high-dose
components to allow estimations of their relative affinities and
contributions to overall dexamethasone-inducible SULT2-40/41
expression, they do indicate that when the IR0 motif is present, a
high-dose component is present that is of sufficient magnitude to
modify the shape of the dexamethasone dose-response relationship for
SULT2-40/41 expression.
|
The low-dose component of dexamethasone-inducible SULT2-40/41 gene
activation is suggestive of a classical glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanism. To test this possibility, hepatocyte cultures were transiently transfected with either the 227 or 158 construct (i.e., either containing or lacking the IR0 motif), and then
treated with 10
8 M dexamethasone (i.e., a dose
sufficient to activate the low-dose component, but not expected to
activate the high-dose component), either in the absence or presence of
the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU486, at
10
6 M [higher RU486 doses have been shown to
activate the PXR (Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al., 1998
; Schuetz
et al., 1998
)]. As shown in Fig. 2, treatment with
10
8 M dexamethasone produced comparable
increases in luciferase expression in hepatocytes transfected with
either of the two constructs (Fig. 4).
Treatment with 10
6 M RU486 alone had no effect
on luciferase activity, whereas cotreatment with RU486 significantly
inhibited (by ~53%, p < .05) dexamethasone-induced luciferase expression from both constructs. These findings suggest that
low-dose dexamethasone-inducible SULT2-40/41 expression is mediated
through a glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanism, and that this
effect does not require the IR0 motif.
|
Dexamethasone treatment induces CYP3A expression at higher doses than
those required to saturate the classical glucocorticoid receptor.
Recently, certain steroids, including dexamethasone, and other
chemicals that induce CYP3A have been shown to activate a newly
described member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, termed the PXR
(Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al., 1998
; Schuetz et al., 1998
). The
prototypical CYP3A inducer pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile has no
glucocorticoid receptor agonist activity. Nevertheless, pregnenolone
16
-carbonitrile is among the most efficacious activators of the
mouse PXR (Kliewer et al., 1998
). To examine whether the IR0 motif,
implicated in mediating the high-dose component of dexamethasone-inducible SULT2-40/41 expression, might confer
transcriptional responsiveness to pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile,
primary cultured rat hepatocytes were transiently transfected with a
panel of SULT2-40/41 5'-luciferase constructs and treated with either
10
8 or 10
6 M
dexamethasone, or with 10
5 M pregnenolone
16
-carbonitrile. The SULT2-40/41 constructs consisted of those
described in Figs. 2 and 3, and an additional construct containing the
1938-bp 5'-flanking sequence, but specifically lacking the entire IR0
motif (
IR0). In contrast to dexamethasone, pregnenolone
16
-carbonitrile-inducible reporter gene activation was restricted
only to hepatocytes that were transfected with SULT2-40/41
5'-luciferase reporter constructs containing the intact IR0 motif.
Thus, pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile treatment produced significant
increases in luciferase activity of 3.1- and 2.8-fold in hepatocytes
transfected with the 1938 or 227 construct, respectively (Fig.
5, A and C), but failed to induce
reporter gene expression in hepatocytes transfected with any of the
other constructs (Fig. 5, B and D-F).
|
Because glucocorticoid-inducible luciferase activity was still
preserved when primary cultured rat hepatocytes were transfected with
construct 158, which contained the least amount of 5' information, two
additional constructs were prepared, extending to bp
77 or
34
relative to the transcription start site (constructs 77 and 34). These
particular constructs were designed based on a recent report by Roy and
coworkers (Song et al., 1998
) that the promoter proximal ~140 bp of
the SULT2-40/41 gene contained four sites (termed A, B,
C1, and C2) that were
protected in DNase I footprint experiments with rat liver nuclear
extracts. Thus, construct 77 contained only sites A and B, whereas
construct 34 did not contain any of the footprinted sites. When these
constructs were tested in transient transfection assays, neither the 77 nor the 34 construct conferred any glucocorticoid-inducible reporter
gene activity, suggesting that sequences contained within domains
C1 and/or C2 are critical
for achieving glucocorticoid responsiveness (data not shown).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously reported that the administration of dexamethasone to
adult male rats significantly induced SULT2 mRNA and protein levels in
the liver (Runge-Morris et al., 1996
). In primary cultured rat
hepatocytes, SULT2 mRNA expression continued to increase as the
dexamethasone dose was augmented from 10
8 to
10
5 M (Runge-Morris et al., 1996
). These
findings contrasted sharply with those obtained for expression of
tyrosine aminotransferase, a gene that is regulated via a classical
glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanism (Shinomiya et al., 1984
). In
hepatocytes, lower doses of dexamethasone (10
8
M compared with 10
5 M) produced more
substantial increases in tyrosine aminotransferase mRNA expression, and
cotreatment with dexamethasone and the glucocorticoid receptor
antagonist RU486 had a greater inhibitory effect on
dexamethasone-induced tyrosine aminotransferase than on
dexamethasone-induced SULT2 mRNA expression (Runge-Morris et al.,
1996
). These data implicated the involvement of an "alternative"
relative to a "classical" glucocorticoid receptor-mediated
mechanism in the control of glucocorticoid-inducible SULT2 gene expression.
In this study, we have extended our earlier findings by characterizing
the transcriptional regulation by glucocorticoids of expression of the
SULT2-40/41 gene, the best characterized of the SULT2 family members,
by conducting transient transfection analyses with a series of
SULT2-40/41 5'-luciferase reporter constructs. These transient
transfection studies were performed with primary cultured rat
hepatocytes as the recipient cell, and the particular hepatocyte
culture model that was used has been shown, through a variety of
criteria, to exhibit a highly differentiated phenotype, and to
recapitulate many of the effects of endogenous and xenobiotic substances on gene expression that are produced in liver in vivo. Findings of the present study suggest that glucocorticoids, such as
dexamethasone, induce SULT2-40/41 gene transcription via a dual
mechanism, a low-dose effect that is probably transmitted through the
glucocorticoid receptor, and a high-dose effect that may be mediated
through the newly described PXR (Kliewer et al., 1998
). Several pieces
of evidence are offered in support of these assertions. Dose-response
analysis suggested that dexamethasone, a potent glucocorticoid and
efficacious CYP3A inducer, activated SULT2-40/41 transcription through
both a low -dose- and a high-dose-mediated mechanism. The low-dose
effect was observed in constructs containing as little as 158 of the 5'
sequence, whereas the high-dose effect was observed only in constructs
containing the IR0 motif. In contrast, triamcinolone acetonide, a
potent glucocorticoid that is not an effective CYP3A inducer, produced
only the low-dose-type inductive effect. Because the low dose-mediated
effect was produced by two potent glucocorticoids, we postulated that
this effect may occur through a glucocorticoid receptor-mediated
mechanism. We have provided evidence in support of this hypothesis by
demonstrating that coincubation of transfected primary cultured rat
hepatocytes with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU486
significantly inhibited SULT2-40/41 gene activation by low-dose
dexamethasone treatment, irrespective of whether the transfected
construct contained the IR0 motif.
Because the high dose-mediated effect on SULT2-40/41 expression was
produced only by a glucocorticoid that is also an efficacious CYP3A
inducer, we postulated that the high-dose effect may be mediated
through the PXR, a newly described member of the nuclear receptor
superfamily that has been shown to mediate CYP3A induction by a variety
of steroidal and nonsteroidal chemicals (Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann
et al., 1998
; Schuetz et al., 1998
). In support of this possibility, we
showed that treatment of hepatocytes with the prototypical CYP3A
inducer and PXR agonist pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile increased
reporter gene activity, but only when the transfected SULT2-40/41
construct contained an intact IR0 motif. The activated PXR has
previously been shown to interact with the direct repeat-3 and everted
repeat-6 nuclear receptor motifs found in the CYP3A23 (rat) and CYP3A4
(human) genes, respectively (Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al.,
1998
). Our findings raise the possibility that the PXR also may
interact with the SULT2-40/41 IR0 motif. However, until such an
interaction is verified experimentally, it remains possible that
nuclear receptors other than, or in addition to, PXR may mediate
glucocorticoid-inducible SULT2-40/41 gene transcription. In this
regard, the constitutive androstane receptor was recently shown to bind
to and activate transcription through the same CYP3A4 everted repeat-6
nuclear receptor motif that interacts with PXR (Sueyoshi et al., 1999
).
Although our data suggest that low doses of glucocorticoids activate
SULT2-40/41 transcription through a glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanism and that the responsive cis-acting element resides
within the 158 bp immediately upstream of the transcription start site (specifically within the fragment located at
77 to
158 relative to
the transcription start site), this region of the SULT2-40/41 gene does
not contain a typical glucocorticoid response element, suggesting that
the glucocorticoid receptor may not directly interact with SULT2-40/41
DNA. A possible explanation for these findings may relate to the
findings of Roy and coworkers (Song et al., 1998
), who reported that
each of the four DNase I-protected sites that are contained within the
first 140 bp of the SULT2-40/41 gene (i.e., sites A, B,
C1, and C2; the
glucocorticoid-responsive
77 to
158 fragment includes sites
C1 and C2) interacts with liver-enriched C/EBP and/or HNF1 transcription factors. In addition, transient overexpression of C/EBP
activated SULT2-40/41 5'-reporter gene transcription in HepG2 cells, whereas coexpression of both C/EBP
and HNF1
synergistically activated reporter gene expression in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts (Song et al., 1998
). Of particular note, certain
C/EBP family members (e.g.,
and
) are reported to be glucocorticoid-inducible transcription factors (Takiguchi, 1998
).
Our data suggest that sequences upstream of bp
227 are not essential
for glucocorticoid-inducible SULT2-40/41 transcription. However, the
PstI construct consistently displayed the lowest glucocorticoid inducibility of any of the constructs. If sequences upstream of bp
227 have no role in regulating glucocorticoid-mediated SULT2-40/41 gene transcription, glucocorticoid-induced transcription of
the
PstI construct should have been as great as it was
from the 158 construct. Also, if the IR0 motif is the only sequence contained within the PstI fragment that participates in
glucocorticoid inducibility, transcription of the
PstI
construct should have been as great as it was from the IR0-Mut
construct. Therefore, our findings suggest that one or more
cis-acting elements located upstream of bp
227 may exert a
negative effect on glucocorticoid-inducible SULT2-40/41 expression, but
that this suppressive effect is only revealed upon deletion of an
element, other than the IR0, that is contained within the
PstI fragment. Of possible significance in this regard, Roy
and coworkers (Song et al., 1998
) implicated a DNase I-protected region
between
231 and
292 in mediating androgen-repressible SULT2-40/41
gene transcription. This region contained several binding sites for
Oct-1 and C/EBP, but did not bind to the androgen receptor. In
addition, Chandran et al. (1999)
recently provided evidence that
glucocorticoid-repressible transcription of the gonadotropin-releasing
hormone gene is mediated through a multiprotein complex in which the
glucocorticoid receptor does not directly bind to the negative
regulatory region, but rather is tethered to DNA-bound Oct-1.
In the liver, members of the SULT2 gene family are involved in bile
acid detoxication and drug metabolism, and in the regulation of
intratissue active hormone levels. It stands to reason that disruption
or deregulation of SULT2 gene expression may have serious consequences
for hepatic cholestasis, xenobiotic detoxication, and hormone response
mechanisms. Although the deduced amino acid sequences corresponding to
individual SULT2 isoforms maintain a close (~86.3 to 99.6%)
structural identity (Watabe et al., 1994
; Yamazoe et al., 1994
;
Runge-Morris et al., 1998
), we and others have shown that the mRNA
expression of separate SULT2 isoforms is differentially regulated in
response to hormone or xenobiotic treatment. For example, noncoordinate
regulation by growth hormone of the rat hepatic SULT2-40/41 and
SULT2-20/21 isoforms in growth hormone-deficient rats has been
previously described (Ueda et al., 1997
). In addition, male and female
rat liver displayed very different patterns of SULT2 isoform-specific
mRNA expression following in vivo treatment with pharmacologic doses of
dexamethasone or pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile (Liu and Klaassen,
1996
). Similarly, we found that SULT2-40/41 mRNA levels were induced,
whereas amounts of SULT2-20/21 mRNA were concomitantly suppressed when
male rats were treated with CYP2B-inducing doses of phenobarbital
(Runge-Morris et al., 1998
).
The reasons for heterogeneity in the expression and regulation of
individual SULT2 isoforms are not yet clear, but suggest that despite
their overlapping substrate specificities, the SULT2-40/41, -20/21, and
-60 isoforms may have important differences in their substrate
specificity profiles and consequent biological activities in vivo. The
existence of dual mechanisms for the regulation of steroid-inducible
SULT2-40/41 expression may presage the enzyme's physiological role.
Thus, physiological levels of circulating glucocorticoid
[~10
8 to 7 × 10
7 M corticosterone in rat (Oster et al.,
1988
; De Boer and Van der Gugten, 1987
)] would primarily activate the
low-dose, glucocorticoid receptor-mediated component of SULT2-40/41
transcription, which may be essential for maintaining basal
liver-specific SULT2-40/41 gene expression. Alternatively, higher doses
of glucocorticoids, as occur during periods of physiological stress,
may augment SULT2-40/41 gene expression via activation of the PXR.
Additional molecular studies are required to define the precise
identities, interactions, and functional significance of the nuclear
receptor transcription factors that govern glucocorticoid-inducible
SULT2-40/41 gene expression.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge the technical contributions of Amy Wesa, Anita Reddy, Kelly Rose, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center Cell Culture Facility Core, and the Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics DNA Sequencing Facility at Wayne State University.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 15, 1999; Accepted September 14, 1999
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants ES05823 (to M.-R.M.) and HL50710 (to T.A.K.), and by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center Grant ES06639.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Melissa Runge-Morris, Institute of Chemical Toxicology, Wayne State University, 2727 Second Ave., Detroit, MI 48102. E-mail: m.runge-morris{at}wayne.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
SULT2, hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase; Oct-1, octamer transcription factor-1; HNF1, hepatic nuclear factor 1; C/EBP, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein; CYP3A, cytochrome P-450 3A; bp, base pair; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PXR, pregnane X receptor; IR0, inverted repeat-0 nuclear receptor motif.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-carbonitrile regulate de novo synthesis of a common form of cytochrome P-450 in cultures of adult rat hepatocytes in the liver in vivo.
J Biol Chem
259:
1999-2006This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-L. Fang, S. C. Strom, E. Ellis, Z. Duanmu, J. Fu, Z. Duniec-Dmuchowski, C. N. Falany, J. L. Falany, T. A. Kocarek, and M. Runge-Morris Positive and Negative Regulation of Human Hepatic Hydroxysteroid Sulfotransferase (SULT2A1) Gene Transcription by Rifampicin: Roles of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4{alpha} and Pregnane X Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2007; 323(2): 586 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Echchgadda, C. S. Song, T. Oh, M. Ahmed, I. J. De La Cruz, and B. Chatterjee The Xenobiotic-Sensing Nuclear Receptors Pregnane X Receptor, Constitutive Androstane Receptor, and Orphan Nuclear Receptor Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4{alpha} in the Regulation of Human Steroid-/Bile Acid-Sulfotransferase Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 21(9): 2099 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Guzelian, J. L. Barwick, L. Hunter, T. L. Phang, L. C. Quattrochi, and P. S. Guzelian Identification of Genes Controlled by the Pregnane X Receptor by Microarray Analysis of mRNAs from Pregnenolone 16{alpha}-Carbonitrile-Treated Rats Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2006; 94(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Song, I. Echchgadda, Y.-K. Seo, T. Oh, S. Kim, S.-A Kim, S. Cho, L. Shi, and B. Chatterjee An Essential Role of the CAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein-{alpha} in the Vitamin D-Induced Expression of the Human Steroid/Bile Acid-Sulfotransferase (SULT2A1) Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 20(4): 795 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Duanmu, A. Weckle, S. B. Koukouritaki, R. N. Hines, J. L. Falany, C. N. Falany, T. A. Kocarek, and M. Runge-Morris Developmental Expression of Aryl, Estrogen, and Hydroxysteroid Sulfotransferases in Pre- and Postnatal Human Liver J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1310 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Orans, D. G. Teotico, and M. R. Redinbo The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor Pregnane X Receptor: Recent Insights and New Challenges Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 19(12): 2891 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|