![]() |
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 6, 1229-1237, December 1999
Department of Experimental Zoology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) of the African
catfish couples to phospholipase C and belongs to the large family of G
protein-coupled receptors. We recently demonstrated that removal of the
carboxyl-terminal tail (S331-Q379) from the catfish GnRH-R results in
a loss of agonist binding; the current study sought to define more
precisely the role of this region in receptor function. Progressive
truncations of the carboxyl-terminal tail decreased cell surface
expression detected by either enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or
agonist-binding. The two most truncated receptors (stop331 and stop337)
showed no binding but were detected at the cell surface by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All receptors able to bind agonist
were also able to activate phospholipase C. The catfish GnRH-R was
phosphorylated after agonist-occupation and use of truncated mutants
showed this phosphorylation to be within the carboxyl-terminal tail.
Furthermore, studies with S356A, S363A and SS356,363AA mutant receptors
demonstrated that Ser363 is a major site of agonist-induced
phosphorylation. The absence of this phospho-acceptor site markedly
impaired agonist-mediated receptor internalization. In addition, both,
Ser363 and the last 12 residues of the tail (not containing Ser363)
were shown to be important for
-arrestin-dependent internalization.
These observations are relevant to the regulatory function of the
carboxyl-terminal tail of G protein-coupled receptors in general and
are particularly intriguing given the absence of this region in
mammalian GnRH-Rs.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gonadotropin-releasing
hormone (GnRH) is a hypothalamic decapeptide that acts on cells of the
anterior pituitary to stimulate the release of both
follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. These hormones
play a major regulatory role in gonadal steroidogenesis and gamete
maturation and GnRH is therefore a central player in the control of
vertebrate reproduction (Fink, 1988
). The receptor for GnRH
(GnRH-R) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family
and the binding of GnRH activates phospholipase C (PLC), resulting in
the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. The resulting
generation of both inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol is
able to mobilize Ca2+ from intracellular stores
and activate protein kinase C, respectively (Berridge, 1993
), thereby
mediating many of the biological effects of GnRH.
GPCRs are characterized structurally by an extracellular amino terminus
and an intracellular carboxyl terminus linked by seven transmembrane-spanning helices, which themselves are joined by three
extracellular loops and three intracellular loops. In general, the
extracellular domains and/or transmembrane regions are involved in
ligand-recognition, whereas cytoplasmic regions present sites for
interactions with not only G proteins but also other proteins (Wess,
1997
; Ji et al., 1998
). The full extent of such interactions and their
functional consequences has yet to be established, but there clearly
exists the potential for regulation of both receptor trafficking and
agonist-receptor-effector coupling. In this context, it is interesting
that the mammalian GnRH-Rs are unique among the GPCR family, because
they completely lack an intracellular carboxyl-terminal tail (Sealfon
et al., 1997
). In many receptors, this region has indeed been
demonstrated to impart regulatory features. In particular, this region
is important for agonist-induced phosphorylation, which may both
uncouple the receptor from its cognate G protein and target the
receptor for internalization (Ferguson et al., 1996
; Lefkowitz, 1998
).
Accordingly, our recent studies have indicated that the tail-less
mammalian GnRH-R is resistant to rapid desensitization and the receptor
also has slow internalization kinetics (Heding et al., 1998
).
In contrast to the mammalian versions of the GnRH-R, but in common with
other GPCRs, the cloned nonmammalian GnRH-Rs all have a
carboxyl-terminal tail (Sealfon et al., 1997
; Tensen et al., 1997
;
Illing et al., 1999
). We have demonstrated recently that in contrast to
the mammalian GnRH-R, the GnRH-R of the African catfish (Clarias
gariepinus) is susceptible to rapid desensitization and has
enhanced internalization kinetics (Heding et al., 1998
). We have also
demonstrated that removal of the carboxyl-terminal tail from the
catfish GnRH-R results in a loss of GnRH binding (Blomenröhr et
al., 1997
). Moreover, addition of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the
catfish GnRH-R to the tailless rat GnRH-R results in an increase in the
level of cell-surface expression (Lin et al., 1998
). Taken together,
these data suggest that the carboxyl-terminal tail of this nonmammalian
GnRH-R plays a pivotal role in its function, and this receptor provides
a model system in which to explore the relationship between structural
features of GPCRs and their functional correlates.
The aim of the current study was, therefore, to characterize the function of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the catfish GnRH-R in relation to cell-surface expression, ligand binding, and agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation and internalization. A truncation and point mutation strategy was adopted to identify the key residues that underlie the functional characteristics imparted by the carboxyl-terminal tail.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutant Catfish GnRH Receptor Constructs.
Mutations in the
catfish GnRH-R cDNA insert (Tensen et al., 1997
) were introduced using
the pALTER-1 in vitro mutagenesis system (Promega, Madison, WI)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Ser331, Ser337, Ser348,
Ser356, and Ser368 were replaced by a stop codon, generating truncated
catfish GnRH-Rs designated stop331, stop337, stop348, stop356, and
stop368, respectively (Fig. 1).
Furthermore, Ser356 and Ser363 were mutated to alanine residues,
generating single or double mutant constructs, designated S356A, S363A
and SS356,363AA. Mutant receptor constructs were confirmed by sequence
analysis and subcloned in pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) for
expression studies. For phosphorylation studies, a stretch of
nucleotides coding for a nine amino-acid epitope (YPYDVPDYA) derived
from the influenza virus hemagglutinin protein (HA-tag) was inserted
after the initiating methionine codon of wild-type (wt) or mutant
receptor constructs using a PCR-based procedure. The entire polymerase
chain reaction-amplified portion of the HA-tagged receptor constructs
was sequenced to confirm the absence of random mutations.
|
Cell Culture and Transfection.
HEK 293T cells and COS-7
cells were cultured as described previously (Blomenröhr et al.,
1997
; Heding et al., 1998
) and transiently transfected with wt or
mutant catfish GnRH-R cDNA using the SuperFect transfection method
(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. To prevent cells from detaching, 24-well plates were
coated with poly-D-lysine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) before
seeding cells.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Detection.
HEK
293T cells in 60-mm plates were transfected with various concentrations
of wt catfish GnRH-R cDNA (1-10 µg). In addition, HEK 293T cells
were transfected with 5 µg of wt receptor cDNA (positive control) or
mutant receptor cDNA or pcDNA3 vector only (negative control). After
24 h, cells were transferred into 24-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well) and after an additional 24 h, fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline at
room temperature for 30 min. Samples were then blocked with 1% nonfat
dried milk in 0.1 M NaHCO3 at room temperature
for 4 h and subsequently incubated with an antiserum raised
against the amino terminus of the catfish GnRH-R (Blomenröhr et
al., 1997
) overnight at 4°C (diluted 1:500 in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin). After exposure to peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG [1:1000 in 0.1 M
NaHCO3/1% nonfat dried milk (Sigma)] at room
temperature for 2 h, peroxidase was visualized using TMB liquid
substrate system (Sigma) for 30 min. Absorbance values (at 450 nm) of the negative control were subtracted and the values then
expressed as a percentage of the positive control. All constructs are
tested in triplicate in three separate experiments.
Receptor Binding Assay.
Chicken GnRH-II (cGnRH-II;
[His5,Trp7,Tyr8]-GnRH;
American Peptide Company, Sunnyvale, CA) was iodinated using either the
chloramine-T method and subsequent purification by C18 column
chromatography (Blomenröhr et al., 1997
) or the glucose
oxidase/lactoperoxidase method and subsequent Sephadex G-25 column
chromatography (Heding et al., 1998
). The specific activity of the
radioligand was 111 µCi/mmol. Initial binding assays were carried out
as described previously (Heding et al., 1998
) on cell membranes from
receptor-expressing cells. These cells were also used for ELISA
detection. Because the relative levels of binding of different
receptors as tested on whole cells were similar to those in membrane
fractions, further studies were performed as follows. HEK 293T cells
transfected for ELISA detection were also seeded in 24-well plates
(5 × 105 cells/well) for binding studies.
Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed with assay
medium [HEPES-modified Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
with 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4] before being incubated with
approximately 1 nM 125I-labeled cGnRH-II in 0.5 ml of assay medium at 4°C for 2 h in the presence or absence of
1 µM unlabeled cGnRH-II. The concentration of
125I-cGnRH-II used approximated its
Kd value at the wt catfish GnRH-R (2 nM,
see Results). After two washes with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline, extracellular receptor-associated ligand was
removed by washing with 1 ml of acid solution (50 mM acetic acid and
150 mM NaCl, pH 2.8) for 12 min. The amount of radioactivity present in
the collected acid wash was determined. Internalized radioactivity was
determined after solubilizing the cells in 0.2 M NaOH/1% SDS. All
binding studies were carried out in triplicate in at least three
independent experiments. Specific binding was calculated by subtracting
nonspecific binding (in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled cGnRH-II) from
total binding.
Total Inositol Phosphates (IPs).
Total IPs were extracted
and separated as described previously (Tensen et al., 1997
). Briefly,
24 h after transfection, cells were transferred to 24-well plates
(5 × 105 cells/well in 0.5 ml of
inositol-free DMEM containing 10% dialysed fetal calf serum) and
incubated for 24 h with [3H]inositol (1 µCi/ml; Amersham, Little Chalfont, England). Medium was removed,
cells were washed and preincubated for 10 min with assay medium
(HEPES-modified DMEM containing 10 mM LiCl) followed by addition of 1 µM cGnRH-II at 37°C for 60 min. The assay medium was then aspirated
and cells were frozen with liquid nitrogen. After a methanol/chloroform
extraction, the aqueous phase was transferred to tubes containing Dowex
(AG 1×8) anion-exchange resin (Sigma). Total IPs were then eluted, and
the amount of radioactivity was counted. Assays were performed in
triplicate in three separate experiments.
Receptor Phosphorylation.
This was carried out by
modification of a method described previously (Tobin and Nahorski,
1993
). Cells were removed from 25-cm2 flasks
24 h after transfection and replated in 6-well multidishes (one
flask of cells/well). After a further 24 h, cells were washed with
Krebs/HEPES buffer (10 mM HEPES, 4.2 mM NaHCO3,
11.7 mM glucose, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 4.7 mM KCl, 118 mM
NaCl, and 1.3 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) and incubated at
37°C for 1 h in 1 ml of buffer per well containing 50 µCi of
[32P]orthophosphate. Cells were then either
untreated or challenged with 1 µM cGnRH-II for 5 min by adding the
agonist directly to the wells. Buffer was then aspirated and 0.5 ml of
ice-cold solubilization buffer was added (10 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% deoxycholate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 100 µg/ml iodoacetamide, and 100 µg/ml benzamidine). After 30 min on ice, the solubilization buffer
was removed and centrifuged at 10,000g for 3 min. The
primary antibody (0.6 µg of a rabbit polyclonal IgG raised against
the HA epitope-tag; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was then
added to 0.4 ml of the cleared supernatant. After 60 min on ice, immune
complexes were separated by incubation at 4°C for 15 to 30 min with
protein A-Sepharose beads (150 µl of 30 mg/ml) under constant
agitation. Beads were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000g
for 10 s and washed twice with 1 ml of ice-cold 100 mM Tris-base,
1.5 M NaCl, 0.5% Tween-20, pH 7.4, followed by two washes with 1 ml of
ice-cold 10 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.4. Samples were then extracted
into 20 µl of sample buffer (100 mM Tris · HCl, 2% SDS, 10%
glycerol, 0.1% bromphenol blue, and 200 mM dithiothreitol) by standing
in boiling water for 5 min. Proteins were then resolved by 8%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The gels were dried and
subjected to autoradiography.
Immunoprecipitation/Western Blot. To examine the phosphorylation state of receptors, we had to ensure that the immunoprecipitations, as described above, were effective. To demonstrate this and to obtain an indication of the relative efficiencies of immunoprecipitation for the different receptor constructs, we carried out immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting. Moreover, to confirm the identity of phosphorylated protein, mock-transfected cells were used as receptor-negative control cells in the same experiments. Immunoprecipitations were performed exactly as described above with the exception that cells were not labeled with [32P]orthophosphate; instead, 1.2 mM KH2PO4 was added to the Krebs/HEPES buffer. After resolution by 8% SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. The blot was blocked overnight in 20 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, and 5% dried milk at 4°C and then probed with 1 µg/ml of a mouse monoclonal antibody raised against the HA epitope-tag (clone 12CA5; Boehringer-Mannheim, Sussex, UK). This antibody was visualized using a peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse IgG and enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham International plc, Buckinghamshire, UK).
Receptor Internalization Assay.
Internalization assays were
performed as described for binding assays on whole HEK 293T cells
(Heding et al., 1998
), except that radioligand incubations were
performed using time intervals ranging from 5 min to 2 h at
37°C. Nonspecific binding for each time point was determined under
the same conditions in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled cGnRH-II. After
subtraction of nonspecific binding, the amount of surface-bound
radioactivity was expressed as a percentage of the total binding at
that time interval. All time points were performed in duplicate in at
least three independent experiments. To determine the effect of
-arrestin on internalization, 10-cm dishes containing COS-7 cells
were transiently transfected with 5 µg of receptor cDNA together with
5 µg of
-arrestin cDNA in pcDNA3 or 5 µg of pcDNA3 vector.
Statistical Analysis. All data are presented as mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and, where p < .05, followed by the Bonferroni test. A p < .05 was considered significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the African catfish
GnRH-R depicting the amino acid sequence of the intracellular carboxyl-terminal tail (T329-Q379). To study the functional relevance of the carboxyl-terminal tail, five different, progressively truncated catfish GnRH-R constructs (stop331, stop337, stop348, stop356, and
stop368) were generated. Because we knew from previous work that HEK
293T cells transiently transfected with the stop331 mutant catfish
GnRH-R show very little binding of 125I-cGnRH-II
(Blomenröhr et al., 1997
), we developed an ELISA to quantitatively measure catfish GnRH-R protein expressed at the cell
surface. A polyclonal antibody raised against the extracellular amino
terminus of the catfish GnRH-R specifically recognized the catfish
GnRH-R. Thus, cells transfected with pcDNA3 vector or with rat GnRH-R
cDNA gave similar absorbance values [0.062 ± 0.006 (n = 3) and 0.067 ± 0.006 (n = 3), respectively], whereas cells transfected with catfish GnRH-R cDNA
gave absorbance values up to 5.3 times higher (Fig.
2A). Moreover, increasing amounts of transfected catfish GnRH-R cDNA yielded increasing absorbance values
with a maximum of 0.328 ± 0.008 (n = 3) at 5 µg
of DNA/60-mm dish (Fig. 2A). These ELISA results reflected the
data obtained in binding studies using 1 nM
125I-cGnRH-II (Fig. 2B), because maximal
specific binding of 125I-cGnRH-II [11182 ± 1349 cpm (n = 3)] was also achieved at 5 µg of
DNA/60-mm dish. We therefore used the ELISA detection method to
quantify mutant receptor expression levels at the surface of transfected HEK 293T cells.
|
Progressively larger truncations of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the
catfish GnRH-R resulted in progressively decreasing levels of receptors
detected at the cell surface, ranging from 81.7 ± 9.8% to
41.0 ± 2.9% of wt catfish GnRH-R levels (Fig.
3, solid bars). The results of binding
studies on membrane fractions largely resembled the ELISA data: the
shorter the carboxyl-terminal tail, the lower the specific binding of
125I-cGnRH-II (Fig. 3, hatched bars). However,
there was a greater loss of binding than truncated receptor expression
determined by ELISA. Indeed, the stop331 and stop337 mutant receptors,
although showing cell surface expression (as measured by ELISA) of
about 40% of wt catfish GnRH-R levels, showed hardly any detectable binding of 125I-cGnRH-II (Fig. 3). Binding to
whole cells rather than membranes gave similar results with respect to
relative levels of binding of different receptors (data not shown).
Binding of 125I-cGnRH-II to its receptor was
saturable with a Bmax value of 9.87 ± 0.88 pmol/mg membrane protein and a Kd
value of
8.67 ± 0.15 (log10 M, 2.16 nM;
n = 3).
|
In addition to the expression studies, we also investigated the function of truncated receptor constructs by measuring their ability to activate PLC. After 24-h labeling with [3H]inositol and 1-h stimulation with 1 µM cGnRH-II, the cellular levels of total IPs were determined. Basal IP levels for the wt and mutated receptor constructs were similar (284 ± 34 dpm). Stimulation of the wt GnRH-R resulted in an accumulation of IPs to 940 ± 232% of basal. With the exception of the stop331 and stop337 mutant receptors, stimulation of all other truncated receptors resulted in an accumulation of [3H]IPs against a Li+-block of inositol monophosphatase activity (Fig. 3, open bars). The relative levels of [3H]IP accumulation largely paralleled the binding levels.
To determine if the wt and mutant catfish GnRH-Rs were phosphorylated after agonist occupation, we inserted an HA-tag into the catfish GnRH-R. The insertion of this epitope allowed immunoprecipitation of the receptors using a commercially available antibody recognizing the HA epitope. We already had experience in receptor immunoprecipitation using an antibody raised against this epitope; given the commercial availability of this antibody, we chose to use this method for our immunoprecipitations. The antibody raised against the HA epitope-tag also recognized the receptors in our ELISA assay (data not shown). Moreover, the HA-tagged catfish GnRH-R showed binding and signal transduction characteristics similar to those of untagged wt catfish GnRH-Rs (data not shown).
Immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting demonstrated that all
of the truncated catfish GnRH-Rs could be immunoprecipitated using the
anti-HA polyclonal antibody (Fig. 4A).
Bands were detected at ~82 kDa for the wt catfish GnRH-R, ~81 kDa
for stop368, ~79 kDa for stop356, and ~77 kDa for stop348.
Additional bands were also observed for all receptors at higher
molecular masses. It is unclear whether these bands represent
receptor dimers/multimers or aggregates that form either naturally or
during the preparative process (despite strongly reducing conditions).
There were also bands of lower molecular mass, which probably represent
unprocessed (particularly unglycosylated) receptors. Agonist challenge
did not, however, alter the distribution of immunoreactivity between the bands, nor did it affect the ability of the anti-HA antibody to
immunoprecipitate the receptors (Fig. 4A). Moreover, extracts of
mock-transfected HEK 293T cells did not show these immunoreactive bands
(Fig. 4A), identifying them as receptor-specific bands.
|
In phosphorylation studies, we were able to demonstrate that a 5-min challenge with 1 µM cGnRH-II resulted in the phosphorylation of the wt catfish GnRH-R and stop368 but not stop356 or stop348 (Fig. 4B). The phosphorylations were observed at ~82 kDa and ~81 kDa for wt catfish GnRH-R and stop368, respectively, suggesting that these are the forms of the receptor inserted into the plasma membrane and accessible to a kinase after agonist binding. Again, extracts of mock-transfected cells did not contain phosphorylated proteins.
These data indicated that phosphorylation is likely to occur between
residue 355 and 368 of the carboxyl-terminal tail. In this region there
are two candidate phosphorylation sites, namely Ser356 and Ser363. To
identify which of these potential sites are phosphorylated after
agonist challenge of the catfish GnRH-R, we created and transfected
S356A, S363A, and SS356,363AA mutant catfish GnRH-R constructs (see
Fig. 1). All of these mutant receptors (S356A, S363A, and SS356,363AA)
were expressed at the cell surface, bound
125I-cGnRH-II, and increased
[3H]IP accumulation after agonist challenge to
similar extents as the wt catfish GnRH-R (p > .05;
Fig. 5). Immunoprecipitation followed by
Western blotting again demonstrated that we were able to
immunoprecipitate these expressed receptor constructs with the anti-HA
antibody and that their immunoprecipitation was not affected by agonist treatment (1 µM cGnRH-II for 5 min; Fig.
6A, data not shown). Bands were present
at ~82 kDa for all of these receptors, although bands of higher
molecular mass were again present. Studies demonstrated that a band at
~82 kDa was phosphorylated after agonist challenge (1 µM cGnRH-II
for 5 min) of S356A (Fig. 6B) although no such phosphorylation of
either S363A (Fig. 6B) or SS356,363AA (data not shown) occurred.
|
|
We also investigated the importance of the carboxyl-terminal tail, the
role of agonist-induced phosphorylation of Ser363, and the involvement
of
-arrestin in the process of agonist-induced receptor
internalization. Using a two-compartment model described by Koenig and
Edwardson (1997)
, we calculated the steady-state proportion of
receptors at the cell surface (Rs,ss) in the
presence of agonist. Rs,ss values represent
means ± S.E. of three individual experiments. The wt catfish
GnRH-R internalized up to about 60% in HEK 293T cells over a 2-h
period (Fig. 7). We have previously published similar results in HEK 293 cells (Heding et al., 1998
). All
truncated receptor constructs tested were internalized significantly less than the wt catfish GnRH-R, resulting in a greater proportion of
receptors at the cell surface at steady state
[Rs,ss values of 39.88 ± 1.39%,
63.65 ± 1.93%, 58.40 ± 1.71%, and 49.68 ± 2.80% for wt, stop368 (p < .001), stop356 (p < .001), and stop348 (p < .05), respectively,
n = 3; Fig. 7A]. Interestingly, the receptor construct
with the shortest tail did not exhibit the most attenuated rate and
extent of internalization. The stop368 mutant receptor had a
significantly lower proportion of internalized receptors than the
stop348 mutant receptor (p < .05). The stop356 mutant receptor, on the other hand, was not significantly different from either stop368 or stop348 mutant receptors (p > .05).
Moreover, we demonstrated that the S356A mutant receptor construct had
an Rs,ss value indistinguishable from the
Rs,ss value of the wt catfish GnRH-R (43.23 ± 1.69% and 42.47 ± 1.01%, respectively; p > .05, n = 3), whereas the S363A receptor construct
(56.38 ± 1.95%) differed significantly from wt and S356A mutant
catfish GnRH-Rs (p < .01; n = 3; Fig.
7B) but was similar to the truncated receptor constructs (p > .05).
|
We next wanted to investigate the relationship between the
phosphorylation site and the last 12 amino acid residues in the process
of endocytosis of the catfish GnRH-R. To this end, the effect of
different endogenous levels of
-arrestin on catfish GnRH-R
internalization and the importance of Ser363 and the last 12 amino acid
residues in this event were evaluated by performing experiments in
COS-7 cells, which express about 70% less total
-arrestin/mg of
protein than HEK 293 cells (Menard et al., 1997
). Under conditions of
low endogenous
-arrestin expression, the wt catfish GnRH-R had a
dramatically decreased extent of internalization in COS-7 cells
compared with HEK 293T cells, resulting in a significantly greater
portion of receptors at the cell surface at steady state [Rs,ss of 70.47 ± 1.73% (Fig.
8A) and Rs,ss of
39.88 ± 1.39% (Fig. 7A), respectively; p < .01;
n = 3]. However, this impaired internalization under
conditions of low endogenous
-arrestin expression could be largely
recovered by coexpression of
-arrestin, resulting in a decreased
Rs,ss value of 45.83 ± 2.78% (Fig. 8A).
Internalization of the stop368 mutant receptor, on the contrary, was
only poorly affected by coexpression of
-arrestin in COS-7 cells
(Rs,ss of 69.77 ± 3.07% without
-arrestin coexpression and Rs,ss of 60.83 ± 2.22% with
-arrestin coexpression; n = 3; Fig.
8B). Internalization of the S363A mutant receptor, like the stop368
mutant receptor, was also largely unaffected by coexpression of
-arrestin in COS-7 cells (Rs,ss of 61.62 ± 5.05% without
-arrestin coexpression and
Rs,ss of 55.12 ± 2.01% with
-arrestin
coexpression; n = 3; Fig. 8C).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The GnRH receptor is essential in the control of reproduction in both mammalian and nonmammalian species; the absence of an intracellular carboxyl-terminal tail in the mammalian GnRH-R is intriguing given the functional importance of this region in other GPCRs. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the physiological role of the carboxyl-terminal tail using a nonmammalian GnRH-R by comparing the wt catfish GnRH-R with five truncated versions (with decreasing lengths of the carboxyl-terminal tail) and three mutant receptors in which serine residues of the carboxyl-terminal tail were mutated to alanine residues.
Progressive truncation of the carboxyl-terminal tail reduced levels of
receptor expression as determined by either ELISA or agonist binding.
This is consistent with the observation that addition of the catfish
GnRH-R carboxyl-terminal tail to the naturally tailless rat GnRH-R
increases its expression (Lin et al., 1998
). However, the progressive
truncation of the catfish GnRH-R resulted in a proportionally greater
loss of agonist binding than cell-surface expression detected by ELISA.
In stop331 and stop337 receptors, there was little or no binding of
agonist despite cell-surface expression (detected by ELISA) of
approximately 40% of wt receptors. Recognition of these most severely
truncated receptors by antibody but not agonist suggests that these
receptors are transported and inserted into the plasma membrane
(although in reduced amounts), but have a disturbed ligand-binding site
because of the absence of the carboxyl-terminal tail or altered G
protein binding. This could relate to the loss of cysteine residues,
because palmitoylation of these sites within the carboxyl-terminal tail
of other GPCRs allows anchoring to the plasma membrane (Ovchinnikov et
al., 1988
; O'Dowd et al., 1989
; Ng et al., 1993
). Furthermore, mutants
of the luteinizing hormone receptor (Kawate et al., 1997
) and
V2 vasopressin receptor (Sadeghi et al., 1997
),
which lack palmitoylation sites, show decreased binding levels compared
with their wt counterparts. Based on the dramatic loss of agonist
binding for the stop331 and stop337 mutant catfish GnRH-Rs, we suggest
that Cys339 and/or Cys341 may be palmitoylated, thereby anchoring the
receptor to the plasma membrane and allowing formation of a functional
ligand-binding site. Future studies will test this hypothesis.
Measurement of the accumulation of inositol phosphates demonstrated both that progressive truncation of the catfish GnRH-R reduced agonist-activation of PLC and that only receptors that bound agonist could transduce a signal. Furthermore, stop368, stop356, and stop348 mutants couple to G proteins despite their lack of the last 12, 24, and 32 amino acids, respectively, of the carboxyl-terminal tail.
Agonist-dependent phosphorylation is a general phenomenon among the
GPCR family, including receptors coupling preferentially to the
activation of PLC (Tobin, 1997
). According to the ternary complex
model, agonist-occupied GPCRs isomerize from an inactive to an active
conformation. This is likely to involve the conserved NP(X)1,2Y motif in transmembrane 7 and seems to
enable coupling to G proteins (Gether and Kobilka, 1998
). Moreover,
this conformational change increases the effectiveness of GPCRs as
substrates for phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs) (Ferguson et al.,
1996
). This model is supported by a mutant
2-adrenoceptor in which the tyrosine of the
NP(X)1,2Y motif has been replaced by alanine. This mutant has markedly reduced agonist-dependent phosphorylation; , however, this reduction can be reversed by overexpression of GRK2
(Ferguson et al., 1995
). For several GPCRs, including the
2-adrenoceptor, the luteinizing hormone
receptor, the
-factor receptor, and the C5
anaphylatoxin
receptor, serine and threonine residues in distal portions of the
carboxyl-terminal tail are sites for GRK(s) phosphorylation after
receptor activation (Hausdorff et al., 1990
; Wang et al., 1996
;
Böhm et al., 1997
; Koenig and Edwardson, 1997
; Naik et al., 1997
;
Hicke et al., 1998
). In other receptors, phosphorylation sites are
located in different regions of the receptor, most notably the first
and third intracellular loops (Nakamura et al., 1998
). Here, we show
that the catfish GnRH-R is rapidly phosphorylated after exposure to
agonist and that Ser363 within the carboxyl-terminal tail may be the
major site for this phosphorylation. Mammalian GnRH-Rs lack this
potential phospho-acceptor site, because the carboxyl-terminal domain
is completely absent and an understanding of the role of such sites may
be key to understanding the physiological relevance of the lack of a
carboxyl-terminal tail within the mammalian GnRH-Rs.
Agonist-induced phosphorylation of GPCRs seems to be involved in
regulating several aspects of their function, including
desensitization, internalization, and the switching of coupling between
different G proteins (Ferguson et al., 1996
; Daaka et al., 1997
;
Lefkowitz, 1998
). In the current study, we have examined the potential
effects on agonist-induced internalization and, in particular, whether agonist-induced phosphorylation of Ser363 is important for
sequestration of the catfish GnRH-R. Compared with the catfish GnRH-R,
the S363A mutant (which is not phosphorylated), but not the S356A
mutant (which is phosphorylated), had a significantly greater
proportion of cell surface receptors (Rs,ss) in
the presence of agonist. This suggests that loss of the
phospho-acceptor site at Ser363 reduces the extent of agonist-mediated
internalization in agreement with reports demonstrating that mutation
of serine and threonine residues in the carboxyl-terminal domains of
other GPCRs results in diminished agonist-induced internalization
(Benya et al., 1993
; Naik et al., 1997
; Pohl et al., 1997
).
It has been demonstrated previously that the catfish GnRH-R is
internalized at twice the rate of the tailless rat GnRH-R (Heding et
al., 1998
); we demonstrate in the current study that truncation of the
catfish GnRH-R results in a reduction in agonist-induced internalization. This is consistent with the observation that complete
truncation of the carboxyl-terminal tail of another nonmammalian (chicken) GnRH-R reduces its rate of agonist-induced internalization levels equivalent to the relatively low rate of the human GnRH-R (Pawson et al., 1998
). This crucial role of the carboxyl-terminal tail
within GPCRs in general is also highlighted by the observation that
progressively larger truncations of the mammalian thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor or gastrin-releasing peptide receptor increasingly impair internalization (Benya et al., 1993
; Nussenzveig et al., 1993
;
Yu and Hinkle, 1998
). We suggest that this may be associated, at least
in part, with the loss of a phospho-acceptor site (or sites), which in
the catfish GnRH-R is Ser363. However, our results also demonstrated
that the stop368 receptor exhibited markedly impaired internalization
despite containing Ser363 and undergoing agonist-dependent
phosphorylation. These data suggest that multiple domains are involved
in regulating internalization, as has been demonstrated for the
mammalian GnRH-R, which also lacks a carboxyl-terminal tail and
potential regulatory phospho-acceptor sites (Arora et al., 1995
, 1997
).
In the case of the catfish GnRH-R, both phosphorylation and the last 12 amino acids of the carboxyl-terminal tail may, therefore, be important
for tail conformation to increase the accessibility of molecular
entities involved in receptor internalization. The adaptor protein
-arrestin might well be such an entity, and it is known that
-arrestin is abundantly expressed in HEK 293 cells (Menard et al.,
1997
). We demonstrate that
-arrestin plays a role in catfish GnRH-R
internalization, and loss of the phospho-acceptor site Ser363, as well
as truncation of the last 12 amino acids of the carboxyl-terminal tail,
indeed largely impair the effect of
-arrestin on receptor
internalization. The fact that stop368, stop356, and S363A mutant
receptors showed a similar decrease in internalization strengthens our
idea that stop368 and S363A mutant receptors might not have additive
effects but contribute to the same process of
-arrestin binding. Our
data agree with the current model for agonist-induced GPCR
internalization, which suggests that agonist stimulation is followed by
receptor phosphorylation and either the generation or stabilization of
a conformation that increases the affinity for
-arrestin. The
binding of
-arrestin seems not only to mediate receptor
desensitization, but also to target GPCRs for clathrin-coated,
vesicle-mediated endocytosis (Ferguson et al., 1996
, 1998
; Lefkowitz,
1998
). It is unlikely that the effects of truncation, phosphorylation,
and interaction with
-arrestin on the rate of internalization are
mediated in part by a change in the fraction of GPCRs, because it has
been reported that uncoupled thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptors, for example, exhibit the same internalization as coupled receptors (Petrou et al., 1997
; Yu and Hinkle, 1999
).
In summary, this study demonstrates that the carboxyl-terminal tail of
a nonmammalian GnRH-R is important for cell surface expression and
plays a central role in determining agonist binding. In addition, we
have identified a major site for agonist-induced phosphorylation within
the carboxyl-terminal tail of the catfish GnRH-R and identify this
phosphorylation as an important signal for agonist-induced
internalization. However, agonist-mediated regulation of
internalization of this GPCR is not only dependent upon receptor
phosphorylation. Other domains within the carboxyl-terminal tail, at
least of the catfish GnRH-R, are crucial in regulating the interaction
of the receptor with accessory proteins such as
-arrestin. These
regions directly affect processes such as agonist-induced internalization but may well impinge on other aspects of receptor function.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to Dr. Milka Vrecl, Ms. Alison McGregor, Ms.
Joke Granneman, and Dr. Thijs Zandbergen for helpful advice and technical assistance. We would also like to thank Prof. J.F. Benovic (Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia) who kindly provided us with
cDNA for
-arrestin.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 27, 1999; Accepted September 21, 1999
This research was financially supported by a Wellcome Trust Program Grant (16895/1.5).
M.B. and A.H. contributed equally to this work.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Jan Bogerd, Department of Experimental Zoology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: j.bogerd{at}bio.uu.nl.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; GnRH-R, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PLC, phospholipase C; wt, wild type; HA, hemagglutinin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HEK, human embryonic kidney; cGnRH-II, chicken GnRH-II; IP, inositol phosphate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Rs,ss, steady-state number of receptors at cell surface; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic receptor to different G proteins by protein kinase A.
Nature (Lond)
390:
88-91[Medline].
2-adrenergic receptor sequestration.
J Biol Chem
270:
24782-24789
2-adrenergic receptor sequestration: Intracellular complement of
-adrenergic receptor kinase and
-arrestin determine kinetics of internalization.
Mol Pharmacol
51:
800-808This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Pawson, E. Faccenda, S. Maudsley, Z.-L. Lu, Z. Naor, and R. P. Millar Mammalian Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors Undergo Slow, Constitutive, Agonist-Independent Internalization Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1415 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R Finch, K. R Sedgley, C. J Caunt, and C. A McArdle Plasma membrane expression of GnRH receptors: regulation by antagonists in breast, prostate, and gonadotrope cell lines J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 196(2): 353 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Metallinou, B. Asimakopoulos, A. Schroer, and N. Nikolettos Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Ovary Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2007; 14(8): 737 - 749. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R Sedgley, A. R Finch, C. J Caunt, and C. A McArdle Intracellular gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors in breast cancer and gonadotrope lineage cells J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 191(3): 625 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimizu and G. Y. Bedecarrats Identification of a Novel Pituitary-Specific Chicken Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor and Its Splice Variants Biol Reprod, November 1, 2006; 75(5): 800 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M R Silver and S A Sower Functional characterization and kinetic studies of an ancestral lamprey GnRH-III selective type II GnRH receptor from the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 36(3): 601 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Navratil, T. A. Farmerie, J. Bogerd, T. M. Nett, and C. M. Clay Differential Impact of Intracellular Carboxyl Terminal Domains on Lipid Raft Localization of the Murine Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 788 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PD |