![]() |
|
|
Vol. 56, Issue 6, 1262-1270, December 1999
Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (P.K); and Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (K.M.D.)
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Incubation of CEM cells for 24 h with the guanine,
2,6-diaminopurine, and adenine nucleotide analogs of the
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl) series,
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)guanine (PMEG),
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)-2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP), and
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA), was found to inhibit DNA
synthesis 50% at concentrations of 1, 6, and 25 µM, respectively.
Possible reasons for the marked differences were investigated,
including cellular transport of the analogs, different efficiencies of
intracellular phosphorylation, differential effects on
2'-deoxynucleotide (dNTP) pools, and differences in the affinities of
the cellular DNA polymerases for the diphosphate derivatives of the
drugs. No significant differences in cellular uptake were found
among the analogs; however, they did differ in the efficiency of
phosphorylation, i.e., CEM cells were found to accumulate higher levels
of PMEG-diphosphate (PMEGpp) than PMEDAP-diphosphate (PMEDAPpp) or
PMEA-diphosphate (PMEApp). Treatment of cells with any of the
nucleotide analogs resulted in increased dNTP pools, with PMEG
producing the greatest increase. All three analogs had the greatest
effect on the dATP pool size, whereas the dGTP pool size was not
significantly affected. Comparison of the ratios of nucleotide analog
diphosphates to their corresponding dNTPs under conditions where DNA
synthesis is inhibited 50% suggested that cellular DNA polymerases
were approximately twice as sensitive to PMEGpp than to PMEDAPpp and
5-fold more sensitive to PMEGpp than to PMEApp. Consistent with this
hypothesis, examination of the efficiencies with which the replicative
DNA polymerases
,
, and
incorporated the analogs showed that
DNA polymerase
, the most sensitive of the DNA polymerases,
incorporated PMEGpp twice as efficiently as PMEDAPpp and 7-fold more
efficiently than PMEApp.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
guanine, 2, 6-diaminopurine, and adenine derivatives of the
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl) series
[9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)guanine (PMEG),
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)-2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP), and
9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA)] belong to a class of
acyclic nucleotide analogs containing a catabolically stable P-C
bond in a phosphonylmethylether group that simulates a phosphate moiety
(Fig. 1). Members of this class have been
investigated for antiviral activity (De Clercq, 1991
). The most
extensively studied analog, PMEA, exhibits potent activity against both
DNA viruses and retroviruses (Balzarini et al., 1991b
; Heijtink et al.,
1993
; Naesens et al., 1994
), and the oral prodrug of PMEA (adefovir
dipivoxil) is currently being evaluated for the treatment of both HIV
and hepatitis B virus infections. Several members of this class exhibit
cytotoxicity toward proliferating cells. The cellular toxicity of PMEG
eliminated this compound from further development as an antiviral drug
(De Clercq et al., 1987
); however, PMEG and its prodrug
N6-cyclopropyl PMEDAP (Compton et al.,
1999
) are currently being examined as potential antitumor agents. PMEG
was found to have antiproliferative effects in vitro against human
leukemic cells (Robbins et al., 1995a
) as well as solid tumor cell
lines (Paborsky et al., 1997
) and in vivo against two types of mouse
transplantable tumors (Rose et al., 1990
). PMEG also suppressed the
growth of papillomavirus-induced condylomas on human foreskin
xenografts in mice (Krieder et al., 1990
), and both PMEDAP and PMEA
were found to prolong the mean survival time of rats bearing lymphomas (Otová et al., 1997
).
|
It has been shown that both PMEG and PMEA are converted to mono- and
diphosphates intracellularly (Balzarini et al., 1991a
; Ho et al.,
1992
). Furthermore, the results of in vitro studies with purified or
partially purified replicative DNA polymerases suggest that the
diphosphorylated forms of PMEG and PMEA [PMEG-diphosphate (PMEGpp) and
PMEA-diphosphate (PMEApp)] effectively compete with the corresponding
deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dGTP and dATP) for incorporation into
DNA, and that PMEGpp is a more potent inhibitor of cellular DNA
polymerases than PMEApp (Kramata et al., 1996
; Pisarev et al., 1998
).
These studies suggest that the diphosphorylated forms of the acyclic
nucleotide analogs might inhibit cellular DNA synthesis by a direct
inhibition of replicative DNA polymerases. Acyclic nucleotide analogs
of the PME series also may function as chain terminators after their
incorporation into DNA due to the lack of a 3'-OH moiety in the
molecule. Furthermore, interaction of the nucleotide analogs or their
metabolites with enzymes involved in the synthesis of
deoxyribonucleotides may cause an imbalance in cellular
2'-deoxynucleotide (dNTP) pools. This, in turn, could affect the ratio
of nucleotide analog diphosphate to dNTP and thereby indirectly affect
the ability of an analog diphosphate to compete for binding at a DNA
polymerase active site.
To understand the mechanism of antiproliferative action of acyclic
nucleotides of the PME series, we examined the metabolism of PMEG,
PMEDAP, and PMEA in CEM cells. We also determined the levels of dNTP
pools in treated cells, the intracellular ratios of the
diphosphorylated forms of the analogs to their corresponding deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and the efficiency of incorporation of
the analog diphosphates by replicative DNA polymerases
,
, and
in vitro. In addition, we examined the correlation of these data
with the inhibitory effects of the analogs on cellular DNA synthesis.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compounds.
All reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted. PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA,
along with their mono- and diphosphates, were synthesized at Gilead Sciences (Foster City, CA). [8-3H]PMEG (15.5 Ci/mmol), [8-3H]PMEDAP (18 Ci/mmol),
[2,8-3H]PMEA (35 Ci/mmol),
[2,8-3H]dATP (16.8 Ci/mmol), and
[methyl-3H]deoxyribothymidine
5'-triphosphate
([methyl-3H]dTTP) (60 Ci/mmol)
were obtained from Moravek Biochemicals, Inc. (Brea, CA). The purity of
radioactively labeled nucleotide analogs was >97%.
Inulin[14C]carboxylic acid (6.4 mCi/mmol),
tritiated water (1 mCi/ml), [methyl-3H]thymidine (59 Ci/mmol), [
-32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol), and
unlabeled dNTPs were purchased from Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech
(Piscataway, NJ). Deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), proteinase K, alkaline
phosphatase, and the protease inhibitor cocktail were obtained from
Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). Phosphodiesterase I was
obtained from Worthington Biochemical (Lakewood, NJ), and RNace-It
ribonuclease cocktail was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). All
oligonucleotides used in the study were synthesized and polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (PAGE)-purified by Genosys (The Woodlands, TX).
DNA Polymerases.
DNA polymerases
and
from CCRF-CEM
cells and DNA polymerase
from calf thymus were isolated according
to previously published procedures (Ng et al., 1991
; Kramata et al.,
1995
, 1998
). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen was prepared from calf
thymus as described (Tan et al., 1986
). Protein concentrations were
determined according to the previously published method of Bradford
(1976)
with BSA as standard.
Cells.
The human T-lymphoblastoid cell line CCRF-CEM (ATCC,
CCL 119) was maintained in suspension culture in exponential growth in RPMI 1640 medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) supplemented with
10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Irvine Scientific) and 2 mM
L-glutamine (Irvine Scientific) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells were counted
by hemocytometer, and cell volume was estimated as described with
[3H]H2O and
inulin[14C]carboxylic acid (Wohlhueter and
Plagemann, 1989
). Cell viability was determined by a standard dye
exclusion assay with trypan blue.
Determination of Cellular DNA Synthesis. After 24-h incubation with 1 to 1000 µM nucleotide analogs, cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice in warm, fresh medium, and seeded at a density of 2 × 105/ml. After 30 min, the cells were incubated with [methyl-3H]thymidine (1 µCi/ml) for 30 min, harvested by centrifugation, washed in PBS, and extracted on ice with 0.4 N HClO4. After centrifugation, the acid-insoluble material was washed twice in ice-cold 0.4 N HClO4 and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. To determine the specific activity of the [3H]dTTP cellular pool, the acid-soluble extract was neutralized with trioctylamine in 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, centrifuged, and the water phase was separated with a Partisil-10 SAX column (4.6 × 250 mm) eluted at 1 ml/min with a 30-min linear gradient of 20 to 200 mM KPO4, pH 5.0. The incorporation of [3H]dTMP in DNA was calculated as the counts per minute detected in the acid-insoluble material divided by counts per minute per nanomoles of cellular[3H]dTTP.
Measurement of dNTP Pools.
After a 24-h incubation with 1 to
100 µM nucleotide analogs, 0.75 to 1.5 × 106 cells were harvested by centrifugation,
washed twice in cold PBS, counted, and extracted on ice with 0.4 N
HClO4. The acid-soluble extract was neutralized
with trioctylamine in 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, centrifuged, and
the water phase (100 µl) was frozen and stored at
80°C. The dNTP
pools were determined by adding 2.5 µl of the extract to a 25-µl
reaction mixture containing oligonucleotide template primers of defined
sequence, [3H]dTTP or
[3H]dATP, and DNA polymerase I (Klenow
fragment, 3'-5' exo
; New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA) as described in Sherman and Fyfe (1989)
. Inclusion of
PMEGpp, PMEDAPpp, or PMEDAP-diphosphate (PMEApp) up to 1 µM in the
assay did not affect the polymerase reaction, indicating that the
nucleotide analog diphosphates formed during the incubation of cells
with PMEG, PMEDAP, or PMEA would not interfere in the dNTP pool size determination.
Analysis of Nucleotide Analog Metabolites by HPLC. After a 24-h incubation with 1 to 100 µM 3H-labeled nucleotide analogs ([8-3H]PMEG, 15.5-0.155 Ci/mmol; [8-3H]PMEDAP, 18-0.18 Ci/mmol; [2,8-3H]PMEA, 35-0.35 Ci/mmol), cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice in cold PBS, counted, and extracted with 60% methanol. The extract was evaporated, dissolved in water, and analyzed by HPLC with a Separon SGX C18 reversed-phase column (Melcor Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA) with counter ion [tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (TBHAS)]. Mono- and diphosphates of nucleotide analogs were separated by a 30-min linear gradient of acetonitrile (0-20%) in 50 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4, pH 6.8, 3 mM TBAHS at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. After each run the column was saturated for 5 min with 50 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4, pH 6.8, 20 mM TBAHS. Radioactivity of collected fractions (1 ml) was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Radioactively labeled metabolites were identified with nonlabeled mono- and diphosphates of nucleotide analogs as internal standards.
DNA Primer Extension Assay.
A primer (18-mer) was
5'-32P-labeled with
[
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New
England Biolabs), the labeled products were separated on Quick Spin
columns (Boehringer Mannheim) and annealed in a 1.5:1 ratio to the
respective templates in 10 mM TE, pH 7.5. The following template
primers (T · P) were used: T · P-1:
3'-ACTGGTACATTGTCTCTCAAACAAGGAA-5';
5'-TGACCATGTAACAGAGAG; T · P-2:
3'-ACTGGTACATTGTCTCTCAAATAAGGAA-5';
5'-TGACCATGTAACAGAGAG.
,
, or
contained 0.5 µM dTTP and buffer
(40 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.0, 10%
glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM MgCl2, 200 mg/ml BSA), buffer
(buffer
+ 1 µg of proliferating cell
nuclear antigen/ml) or buffer
(buffer
with pH 7.5),
respectively. In addition, either 0.1 µM
32P-labeled T · P-1 along with various
concentrations of PMEGpp or dGTP were added (PMEG and dGMP
incorporation) or 0.1 µM 32P-labeled
T · P-2 along with various concentrations of PMEDAPpp, PMEApp, or
dATP were added (PMEDAP, PMEA, and dAMP incorporation). After a 15-min
incubation at 37°C, the reactions were stopped by the addition of an
equal volume of 98% formamide containing 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% bromophenol
blue, and 0.2% xylene cyanol FF. Products were separated by 20%
denaturing PAGE, the gels were scanned, and the radioactivity was
quantitated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Km and Vmax
values for incorporation of dNTPs and acyclic nucleoside phosphonate
diphosphates (ANPpps) were calculated from the Michaelis-Menten
equasion with Lineweaver-Burk plots and the KinetAsyst computer program.
Isolation of Cellular DNA and HPLC Analysis of DNA Digest. Exponentially growing CEM cells were incubated with 1 µM [8-3H]PMEG (15.5 Ci/mmol) or 6 µM [8-3H]PMEDAP (18 Ci/mmol) for 24 h at 37°C, harvested, and extracted with methanol as described above. The insoluble material from 1.5 × 107 cells was resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, and 25 mM EDTA, and incubated overnight at 50°C with 0.2 mg/ml proteinase K. The material was twice extracted by phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and once by chloroform. After ethanol precipitation, RNA was removed by a 3-h incubation with 100 U/ml of RNace-It ribonuclease cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim) at 37°C. The phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation steps were repeated. The resulting DNA (~200 µg) was digested for 2 h at 25°C with DNase I (500 U/mg DNA) in buffer containing 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM CaCl2, with addition of fresh DNase I after 1 h. The pH of the solution was then adjusted to 9, and the material was divided into halves. One part was digested to deoxyribonucleoside monophosphates by a 1-h incubation with 2 U of phophodiesterase I at 37°C. The second part was digested to deoxyribonucleosides by a 1-h incubation with 2 U of phophodiesterase I and 5 U of alkaline phosphatase. To identify the phosphonates in the DNA digests, the samples were loaded onto a Partisil-10 SAX (4.6 × 250 mm) column and eluted at 1 ml/min for 30 min with a gradient of 10 to 50 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4, pH 3.7. Radioactivity in each 1-ml fraction was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Retention time of a particular labeled phosphonate was compared with that of an unlabeled standard.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA on Cellular DNA Synthesis in CEM
Cells.
The ability of the nucleotide analogs to inhibit cellular
DNA synthesis was determined by measuring
[3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA after
treatment of CEM cells with various concentrations of the drugs
(1-1000 µM) for 24 h (Fig. 2).
The concentration of drug that inhibited cellular DNA synthesis 50%
(IC50) was found to be ~1 µM for PMEG, 6 µM
for PMEDAP, and 25 µM for PMEA. The marked differences in the
activities of these drugs as inhibitors of DNA synthesis could be the
result of differences in drug metabolism and/or differences in the
affinities of DNA polymerases for the diphosphate derivatives of the
drugs.
|
Intracellular Metabolism of PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA in CEM
Cells.
The levels of PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA and their mono- and
diphosphate derivatives were determined after a 24-h treatment of CEM
cells with varying concentrations of the drugs. As shown in Table
1, we found that the accumulation of
analog diphosphates was linearly dependent on the extracellular
concentration of analog in the tested range (1-100 µM). PMEGpp
accumulated to significantly higher levels (2- to 4-fold) than PMEDAPpp
and PMEApp, with the greatest differences seen at lower analog
concentrations. In accord with the previous observation of Compton et
al. (1999)
, neither PMEG nor its phosphorylated metabolites were
detected in cells treated with PMEDAP, suggesting that PMEDAP is not a
substrate for cellular adenosine or adenylate deaminases.
|
anská et al., 1997Effects of Nucleotide Analogs on Intracellular Levels of
dNTPs.
Treatment of cells with increasing concentrations of the
nucleotide analogs was found to result in increased levels of all four
dNTPs (Fig. 3). Changes in dNTP levels
were much more dramatic in cells treated with PMEG (Fig. 3A) than in
cells treated with PMEDAP (Fig. 3B) or PMEA (Fig. 3C). All three
nucleotide analogs produced the greatest change in the level of dATP
followed by dCTP and dTTP; the level of dGTP changed relatively little.
|
|
Efficiency of Incorporation of PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA Diphosphates
by DNA Polymerase
,
, and
.
To determine the
efficiency with which the replicative DNA polymerases
,
, and
incorporate the nucleotide analog diphosphates into DNA, a primer
extension assay with oligonucleotide template primers (T · P) was
used (Fig. 5). The template primers, with otherwise identical sequences, contained a single incorporation site
for either dGMP (T · P-1) or dAMP (T · P-2), located at the fourth position following the primer 3' terminus. The
Km and Vmax values for the incorporation of PMEGpp, PMEDAPpp, and PMEApp were obtained from Lineweaver-Burk plots as shown in Fig. 5 for DNA polymerase
. Because incorporated nucleotide analogs function as
chain terminators due to the lack of a 3'-OH moiety, extension of the
primer beyond the incorporated analog (Fig. 5, arrow) did not occur.
However, in control experiments with dATP or dGTP as a substrate,
extension of the primer beyond the incorporated dAMP or dGMP did occur
and thus the evaluation of control experiments required inclusion of
three product bands for the analysis (data not shown).
|
,
, and
, respectively. Among
the DNA polymerases, DNA polymerase
was found to have the highest
affinity for the analogs. The incorporation efficiencies were 40.2%
for PMEGpp, 20.5% for PMEDAPpp, and 5.4% for PMEApp. These results
suggest that among the replicative cellular DNA polymerases, DNA
polymerase
is a preferred target for the action of the nucleotide
analog diphosphates. Moreover, the substrate affinities of PMEGpp,
PMEDAPpp, and PMEApp for DNA polymerase
correspond well with the
sensitivities of cellular DNA replication to the three nucleotide
analogs.
|
|
Incorporation of PMEG and PMEDAP into Cellular DNA.
To
determine the levels of PMEG and PMEDAP incorporated into DNA under
conditions where these analogs cause 50% inhibition of cellular DNA
synthesis, cells were labeled with 1 µM
[3H]PMEG (Fig. 6,
A and B) or 6 µM [3H]PMEDAP (Fig. 6, C and D)
for 24 h, followed by isolation of labeled cellular DNA. Aliquots
of purified DNA were then digested to either deoxynucleotides (Fig. 6,
A and C) or deoxynucleosides (Fig. 6, B and D). Analysis of
deoxynucleotides in the digests with an ion-exchange column revealed
small radioactive peaks separated from four deoxynucleotides with a
retention time corresponding to PMEG (27 min; Fig. 6A) and PMEDAP (10 min; Fig. 6C). The majority of the radioactivity coeluted with
deoxynucleotides, probably due to labeling of cellular dNTPs with a
free purine base present as a minor impurity (<3%) in samples of
labeled nucleotide analogs. Consistent with this hypothesis, the
radioactivity eluted from an ion-exchange column in the void volume
along with deoxynucleosides after treatment with alkaline phosphatase
(Fig. 6, B and D). Because the phosphonate bond is resistant to
treatment with alkaline phosphatase, the analogs retain their charged
phosphonate group and are bound by the ion-exchange resin.
Approximately the same amounts of incorporated analogs were detected in
both systems, i.e., 0.32 pmol of PMEG and 0.25 pmol of PMEDAP/mg DNA.
The data demonstrate that both of the analogs are incorporated into
cellular DNA to a similar level following a 24-h incubation with an
extracellular concentration of analog corresponding to the
IC50 for cellular DNA synthesis.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The acyclic nucleotide analogs PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA were found to differ dramatically in their ability to inhibit cellular DNA synthesis in CEM cells. Possible reasons were investigated, including differences in cellular transport of the analogs, different efficiencies of intracellular phosphorylation, and differences in the affinities of the cellular DNA polymerases for the diphosphate derivatives of the drugs.
No significant differences in cellular uptake were found among the
analogs; however, they did differ in the efficiency of phosphorylation
by cellular enzymes. CEM cells were found to accumulate higher levels
of PMEGpp than PMEDAPpp or PMEApp. Previous studies reported that GMP
kinase catalyzes the phosphorylation of PMEG (Ho et al., 1992
) and that
mitochondrial and cytosolic isoenzymes of AMP kinase catalyze
phosphorylation of PMEDAP and PMEA (Merta et al., 1992
; Robbins et al.,
1995b
). Thus, more efficient phosphorylation of the acyclic guanine
analog than the acyclic adenine analogs in CEM cells is probably due to
a higher substrate specificity of GMP kinase for PMEG (Ho et al., 1992
)
compared with the substrate specificity of AMP kinase for PMEA or
PMEDAP (Merta et al., 1992
; Robbins et al., 1995
).
Treatment of CEM cells with any of the acyclic nucleotide analogs was
found to result in increased dNTP pools. PMEG produced the greatest
increase and all three analogs had the greatest effect on the dATP pool
size. Levels of dGTP were not significantly affected by treatment with
any of the nucleotide analogs. Recently, Hatse et al. (1999)
reported a
general increase in dNTP pool size after a treatment of human
erythroleukemia cells (K562) with PMEA. However, in contrast to the
present results, this group observed the highest elevation in
intracellular concentration of dTTP and the lowest change in the dATP
pool size. It is possible that changes in levels of a particular dNTP
after cellular treatment with acyclic nucleotide analogs are dependent
on cell type.
The increase in dNTP pools following treatment with the acyclic
nucleotide analogs contrasts with the effects of the clinically effective nucleoside analogs fludarabine (Gandhi and Plunkett, 1989
;
Huang et al., 1990
) and gemcitabine (Huang et al., 1991
) as well as
2-chloro-9-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-
-D-arabinofuranosyl)adenine (Xie and Plunkett, 1996
) and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyguanosine (Gandhi et
al., 1995
). The antiproliferative action of these drugs was shown to be
the result of both a reduction in dNTP pools, due to inhibition of
ribonucleotide reductase, and incorporation of the analogs into DNA by
DNA polymerases. Thus, depletion of cellular dNTP pools increases the
effectiveness of the triphosphate derivatives of these drugs as
competitors with dNTPs for binding to a DNA polymerase catalytic site.
In contrast, the increased levels of dNTPs in cells treated with
analogs of the PME series may diminish the inhibitory effects of their
diphosphates on cellular DNA synthesis.
Comparison of the ratios of nucleotide analog diphosphates to their
corresponding dNTPs under conditions where DNA synthesis was inhibited
50% suggested that DNA replicative enzymes were approximately twice as
sensitive to PMEGpp than to PMEDAPpp and 5-fold more sensitive to
PMEGpp than to PMEApp. Examination of the incorporation efficiencies of
these analogs in vitro showed that DNA polymerase
, the most
sensitive of the replicative DNA polymerases, incorporated PMEGpp twice
as efficiently as PMEDAPpp and 7-fold more efficiently than PMEApp. In
accord with the present results, a previous study reported that DNA
polymerase
had a 7.6-fold lower IC50 for
PMEGpp than for PMEApp and was more sensitive to the nucleotide analogs
than DNA polymerase
(Pisarev et al., 1998
). Because DNA polymerase
not only cooperates with DNA polymerases
and
at the
replication fork (Bambara et al. 1997
) but also participates in
nucleotide excision repair as a gap filling enzyme (Sancar, 1995
), it
is possible that nucleotide analogs may be incorporated into DNA during
both DNA replication and repair.
Although both PMEG and PMEDAP were detected in DNA of cells treated
with these analogs, their levels were unexpectedly low. In cells where
DNA synthesis was inhibited 50%, only 0.32 pmol of PMEG and 0.25 pmol
of PMEDAP/mg of DNA was found. In contrast, 9-
-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine 5'-monophosphate
(F-ara-A), a DNA chain terminator, was detected at a level of 30 pmol/mg DNA in CEM cells under similar conditions (Huang et al., 1990
). It is possible that cellular proofreading and/or repair mechanisms have
markedly different abilities to remove the acyclic nucleotide analogs
versus 9-
-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine
5'-monophosphate from 3' termini of DNA chains. Although little is
known about cellular repair of nucleoside or nucleotide analogs
incorporated into DNA, it has been demonstrated that F-ara-A-terminated
DNA is not a substrate for the 3'-5' exonuclease of DNA polymerase
and inhibits the enzyme by formation of a "dead end complex" (Kamiya et al., 1996
). In contrast, our previous studies showed not
only that the 3'-5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase
could
remove PMEG from the 3' ends of DNA but also that the DNA polymerase
activity of the enzyme was able to elongate PMEG-terminated primers
(Kramata et al., 1998
). The ability of both DNA polymerases
and
to excise PMEA from the 3' ends of DNA chains in vitro also was
demonstrated by Birku
et al. (1999)
. The in vivo significance of
these activities of the DNA polymerases remains to be elucidated.
The results of the present studies suggest that differences in
inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis by PMEG, PMEDAP, and PMEA may be
explained by different intracellular ratios of the analog diphosphates
to their corresponding deoxynucleoside triphosphates and different
affinities of DNA polymerases, primarily DNA polymerase
, for the
nucleotide analog diphosphates. However, we cannot exclude the
possibility that the mechanism of antiproliferative action of the
acyclic nucleotide analogs also involves some unidentified targets.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 29, 1999; Accepted September 9, 1999
This work was supported by Gilead Sciences and Grant DK26206 from the National Institutes of Health.
Send reprint requests to: Pavel Kramata, Laboratory of Cancer Research, College of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, 164 Frelinghuysen Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020. E-mail: Pavel_Kramata{at}gilead.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PMEG, 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)guanine;
PMEDAP, 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)-2,6-diaminopurine;
PMEA, 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine;
PMEGpp, PMEG-diphosphate;
PMEApp, PMEA-diphosphate;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PMEDAPpp, PMEDAP-diphosphate;
TBAHS, tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate;
ANPpp, acyclic nucleoside phosphonate diphosphate;
F-ara-A, 9-
-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G,
Votruba I,
Holý A and
Otová B
(1999)
9-(2-Phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine diphosphate (PMEApp) as a substrate toward replicative DNA polymerases
,
,
and
*.
Biochem Pharmacol
58:
487-492[Medline].
-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine. A mechanism for cytotoxicity.
J Biol Chem
265:
16617-16625
by fludarabine-terminated DNA.
J Biol Chem
271:
19428-19435
G,
Votruba I,
Otová B and
Holý A
(1995)
DNA polymerases
,
and
from T-cell spontaneus lymphoblastic leukemia of Sprague-Dawley inbred rat: Isolation and characterization.
Collect Czech Chem Commun
60:
1555-1572.
and
in vitro.
J Biol Chem
273:
21966-21971
,
, and
.
Mol Pharmacol
49:
1005-1011[Abstract].
.
J Biol Chem
266:
11699-11704
anská L,
Cihláø T,
Votruba I and
Holý A
(1997)
Transport of Adefovir (PMEA) in human T-lymphoblastoid cells.
Collect Czech Chem Commun
62:
821-828.
-D-arabinofuranosyl)adenine.
Cancer Res
56:
3030-3037This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Botros, S. William, O. Hammam, Z. Zidek, and A. Holy Activity of 9-(S)-[3-Hydroxy-2-(Phosphonomethoxy)Propyl]Adenine against Schistosomiasis mansoni in Mice Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2003; 47(12): 3853 - 3858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kamiya, A. Kubota, Y. Iwase, K. Sekiya, M. Ubasawa, and S. Yuasa Antiviral Activities of MCC-478, a Novel and Specific Inhibitor of Hepatitis B Virus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2002; 46(9): 2872 - 2877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Leblond, G. Attardo, B. Hamelin, D. Y. Bouffard, N. Nguyen-Ba, and H. Gourdeau BCH-1868 [(-)-2-R-dihydroxyphosphinoyl-5-(S)-(guanin-9'-yl-methyl) tetrahydrofuran]: A Cyclic Nucleoside Phosphonate with Antitumor Activity Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2002; 1(9): 737 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Birkus, M. Hajek, P. Kramata, I. Votruba, A. Holy, and B. Otova Tenofovir Diphosphate Is a Poor Substrate and a Weak Inhibitor of Rat DNA Polymerases {alpha}, {delta}, and {varepsilon} Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2002; 46(5): 1610 - 1613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||