|
|
|
|
Vol. 57, Issue 1, 44-52, January 2000
2B Adrenergic
Receptors in Polarized MDCKII Cells Requires the Third Intracellular
Loop but Not G Protein Coupling
Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies in cultured, polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney II
(MDCKII) renal epithelial cells have demonstrated that the apical
steady-state localization and delivery of the A1 adenosine receptor is modified by disruption of the microtubule network with
colchicine, whereas the basolateral localization and trafficking of the
2-adrenergic receptors (
2AR) are not;
instead, the binding capacity of the
2BAR, but not
2AAR or
2CAR subtypes, is increased in a
time-dependent fashion. The present studies explore the molecular basis
for this
2BAR subtype-selective phenomenon. Colchicine selectively increased
2BAR density at the cell surface,
as determined by confocal microscopy, receptor binding, and surface
biotinylation studies. The colchicine-induced increase in the
functional density of the
2BAR requires the third
intracellular loop because the
2BAR loop deletion
(
2BAR
i3) mutant did not show an increased receptor
density after colchicine treatment. Furthermore, the colchicine-mediated increase in
2BAR density is manifest
only in polarized cells because colchicine treatment of nonpolarized MDCKII renal epithelial cells as well as simian kidney COSM6 and human
embryonic kidney HEK293 cells did not effect an increase in
2BAR density. Colchicine-dependent increases in
2BAR density did not depend on functional coupling to G
proteins, however, because pretreatment with pertussis toxin did not
eliminate the effect of colchicine. These data indicate that
microtubule-dependent regulation of
2BAR density at the
basolateral surface of polarized MDCKII cells requires the third
intracellular loop of
2BAR but not functional
2BAR-G protein coupling.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
mechanisms by which G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) attain their
localization in polarized epithelial cells are an important determinant
of trans-epithelial function. Using polarized Madin-Darby
canine kidney II (MDCKII) cells as a model system, we previously
described the different trafficking itineraries for the three
2-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (Wozniak
and Limbird, 1996
). The
2AAR and
2CAR subtypes are directly delivered to the
basolateral surace, whereas the
2BAR is
randomly delivered to both apical and basolateral surfaces. The
2BAR achieves its steady-state basolateral
enrichment due to its retention on that surface
(t1/2 = 10-12 h) compared with its rapid
turnover on the apical surface (t1/2 = 5-15 min). At steady state, the
2AAR and
2BAR subtypes are nearly exclusively on the
basolateral surface, whereas a substantial fraction of the
2CAR population remains in a cytoplasmic
compartment (Wozniak and Limbird, 1996
), corroborating earlier findings
in nonpolarized cells (von Zastrow et al., 1993
). Mutagenesis
strategies, undertaken in detail for the
2AAR
subtype, suggest that the third intracellular loop of the
2AAR is critical for retention of this subtype
on the basolateral surface, but that targeting to the bilayer involves
sequences or structures embedded in or near the bilayer (Keefer et al.,
1994
).
We previously had shown that the A1 adenosine
receptor (A1AdoR), also coupled to
Gi/Go G proteins, is
directly delivered to the apical surface of MDCKII cells and enriched
there at steady state (Saunders et al., 1996
; Saunders and Limbird,
1997
). Studies of surface delivery of truncations of the
2AAR or chimeras with the
A1AdoR suggest that multiple independent
sequences exist in the bilayer of GPCRs to determine targeting of these
seven transmembrane-spanning molecules in a hierarchical fashion to one
versus another surface in polarized cells (Saunders et al., 1998
).
Receptors and other cell surface proteins are not the only nonrandomly
distributed molecules in polarized cells. The apical surface is
undergirded by an actin-rich cytoskeletal network, whereas an
ankryn-fodrin-rich cytoskeleton underlies the basolateral surface
(Nelson and Hammerton, 1989
). Furthermore, actin microfilaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, involved in vesicle and
protein movement within all cells, have been particularly implicated in
polarized trafficking and subsequent function of membrane-targeted
molecules (Matter et al., 1990
; Lafont et al., 1994
; Arreaza and Brown,
1995
). We previously have observed that disruption of microtubules with
colchicine or nocodazole in polarized MDCKII cells paralleled a reduced
apical delivery of A1AdoR and an enrichment, or
rerouting, of the A1AdoR to the basolateral surface (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). In contrast, the same treatment had no impact on the random delivery of the
2BAR subtype to both surfaces before selective
retention on the basolateral surface. However, the amount of
2BAR delivered to the surface was
significantly enhanced in a time-dependent fashion when the microtubule
network of MDCKII cells is depolymerized with colchicine (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). The present studies were undertaken to further explore
the structural regions within
2BAR that
contribute to this unexpected subtype-selective increase in
2BAR density and the mechanisms that may
contribute to this phenomenon.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
[3H]Methoxyinulin (125.6 mCi/g) was purchased from DuPont/NEN (Boston, MA). Protein A-purified
12CA5 monoclonal antibody was from the Berkley Antibody (Richmond, CA);
Cy-3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG was from Jackson ImmunoResearch
(West Grove, PA); monoclonal anti-
-tubulin was from Amersham
(Arlington Heights, IL); and rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin was from
Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Colchicine and lumicolchicine were from
Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Construction of
2BAR
i3-TAG.
The first nine
amino acids after the initiating methionine of the
2BAR evaluated in these studies encode a
hemagglutinin (HA) epitope recognized by the commercially available
monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (Berkley Antibody). The HA-epitope tagged,
mutant
2BAR with the third intracellular loop
deletion was constructed with the Stratagene mutagenesis kit (La Jolla,
CA). The construction of the HA-epitope-tagged
2BAR has been described previously (Wozniak and Limbird, 1996
). Purified oligonucleotides were generated to engineer two NotI sites in the third intracellular loop of
the
2BAR, one at nucleotide 639 and one at
nucleotide 1062. Subsequently, nucleotide sequences encoding the
majority of the third loop were excised via NotI restriction
digest, and the remaining receptor sequence was ligated back together
with the T4 DNA ligase. This resulted in a construct that encoded an
2BAR mutant protein in which only the membrane
proximal sequences of the third loop remained intact (total third loop
length for the
2BAR is 178 amino acids, whereas the third loop of the
2BAR
i3 is 38 amino acids). In the
2BAR
i3 structure, 14 amino acids in the proximal (amino terminal) and 14 amino acids into
the distal (carboxy terminal) portion of the third cytoplasmic loop are
retained because these regions have been demonstrated to be critical
for G protein coupling (Wade et al., 1994
; Eason and Liggett, 1996
).
The
2BAR
i3 mutant was verified by
dideoxy-DNA sequencing.
COSM6 Transfection and Cell Culture.
This was done as
previously described in Guyer et al. (1990)
. Briefly, transient
transfection of simian kidney COSM6 cells (100-mm dishes plated at
1 × 106 cells/dish) with 10 µg of DNA by
the DEAE-dextran method of transfection was used to assess the level of
receptor expression with both immunocytochemistry (as described in
"Steady-State Localization of GPCRs by Immunolocalization") and
[3H]yohimbine binding (as described in
"Receptor-Binding Assays").
Development of Permanent Transformants of Human Embryonic Kidney
(HEK)293 Cells.
This was done as described previously in Schramm
and Limbird (1999)
. HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum at
37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Permanent
transfectants were generated by lipofectamine-mediated cotransfection
of the cells with plasmids containing the indicated receptors and a
neomycin resistance gene. Cells that survived selection in medium
containing 500 µg/ml G-418 were screened for expression of the
expected receptor by binding of the radiolabeled
2AR antagonist
[3H]rauwolscine. Clonal cell lines with varying
levels of
2AR expression were kept for further
study. The experiments reported herein were performed on an
2BAR expressing cell line that contains 2 to 4 pmol/mg of receptor binding.
Development of Permanent Transformants of MDCKII Cells.
Permanent clonal cell lines of MDCKII cells were developed as described
previously (Keefer and Limbird, 1993
; Wozniak and Limbird, 1996
). The
clonal cell lines evaluated in the present study include
TAG
2AAR (25 pmol/mg and 7 pmol/mg protein),
TAG
2BAR (10 pmol/mg and 3 pmol/mg protein),
and TAG
2CAR(5 pmol/mg and 3 pmol/mg protein).
The
2AAR subtype was encoded by a porcine cDNA; the
2BAR and
2CAR subtypes by a rat cDNA.
Polarized Culture of MDCKII Cells and Functional Confirmation of
Intact Monolayers.
MDCKII cells were maintained as described
previously (Keefer and Limbird, 1993
). For polarity experiments, MDCKII
cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106
cells/24.5-mm polycarbonate membrane filter (Transwell chambers, 0.4-µm pore size; Costar, Cambridge, MA), and cultured for 5 to 8 days with medium changes every day. Before each experiment, the
integrity of the monolayer was assessed by monitoring
[3H]methoxyinulin leak (Keefer et al., 1994
).
Receptor-Binding Assays.
MDCKII particulate preparations
were prepared essentially as described in Keefer and Limbird (1993)
.
Briefly, all MDCKII cell lines were grown in Transwell culture (except
when stated otherwise) and allowed to polarize for 7 to 8 days. Binding
assays were performed on membranes harvested from these cells treated
(or not) with varying agents examined in this study. Cells were
harvested into a lysis buffer: 15 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA, pH
8.0, containing 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin, 100 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride.
Assessment of Antagonist Binding.
The pellet resulting from
two washes in lysis buffer followed by centrifugation at
30,000g was resuspended in 900 µl of antagonist binding
buffer (20 HEPES, 25 glycine/glycine, 100 NaCl, 5 EGTA, pH 7.4). COSM6
cells and HEK293 cell membranes were prepared similarly. For all the
cell types, [3H]rauwolscine binding was
performed in 12 × 75-mm polypropylene tubes containing 3 nM
[3H]rauwolscine (diluted in water) in the
absence (total binding) or presence (nonspecific binding) of 10 µM
phentolamine, an
2AR antagonist. Incubations
were for 30 min at 25°C, and were terminated by the addition of 3.5 ml of ice-cold 25 mM glycyl glycine buffer, pH 8.0, and filtration
through Whatman GF/B glass microfiber filters.
Assessment of Agonist Binding. Membranes from clonal cell lines expressing wild-type or mutant receptors were harvested and washed in lysing buffer but resuspended and incubated in an agonist buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM EGTA, pH 8.0. Incubations were for 30 min at 25°C and contained 100 µg of membrane protein, 0.9 nM p-[125I]iodoclonidine ([125I]PIC) agonist radioligand (~160,000 cpm/100-µl incubation). The incubation was terminated by vacuum filtration and the GF/B filters were counted in a Beckman 4000 gamma counter.
Guanine Nucleotide Sensitivity of Radioligand Agonist Binding as
a Measure of
2BAR-G Protein Coupling.
The addition
of Gpp(NH)p, a hydrolysis-resistant GTP analog, to membrane
preparations containing G protein-coupled receptors typically disrupts
receptor/G protein coupling, shifting the receptor from a
higher-affinity state for agonists (functional receptor-G protein
coupling) to a lower-affinity state for agonists (receptor functionally
dissociated from G protein) (Stadel et al., 1980
). Consequently, the
ability of guanine nucleotides to decrease the detectability of
radiolabeled agonist binding is an indirect measure of the existence of
guanine nucleotide-sensitive high-affinity receptor-agonist
interactions (Williams and Lefkowitz, 1977
; Gerhardt et al., 1990
). To
evaluate the ability of Gpp(NH)p to modulate radiolabeled agonist
binding, [125I]PIC incubations were performed
in the absence (control) or presence of increasing concentrations of
Gpp(NH)p. When evaluated, pertussis toxin sensitivity of receptor-GTP
interactions was determined by incubation of MDCKII cells overnight
with 200 ng of pertussis toxin/ml of culture medium (10 ml of
medium/100-mm dish) (Keefer and Limbird, 1993
; Ceresa and Limbird,
1994
). To assess the relative fraction of receptors achieving
high-affinity agonist binding due to receptor-G protein interactions by
different receptor structures or under different incubation conditions,
the quantity of guanine nucleotide-sensitive
[125I]PIC binding (picomoles per milligram) to
total receptor density of [3H]rauwolscine
binding (picomoles per milligram) can be compared.
Treatment of Cells with Colchicine.
Colchicine is an
irreversible microtubule-disrupting drug that binds slowly to soluble
tubulin heterodimers, reducing them to large aggregates and rendering
them incapable of polymerizing for microtubule growth. Incubations with
10 µM colchicine were performed for 15 h as previously described
(Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). Immunocytochemical analysis of treated
cells with an anti-
-tubulin antibody confirmed that colchicine
treatment of cells had indeed disrupted the microtubule network, as
seen in Fig. 1C.
|
Steady-State Localization of GPCRs by Immunolocalization.
Immunostaining of cells grown in Transwell culture was performed as
described previously (Saunders et al., 1996
; Saunders and Limbird,
1997
) with the following concentrations of primary antibody: a 1:50
dilution of 12CA5 primary antibody, purified as described previously
(Wozniak and Limbird, 1996
), for the localization of hemagglutinin
epitope-tagged GPCRs (Keefer and Limbird, 1993
). The
antibody-containing buffers and wash buffers contained 0.1% Triton
X-100 to permit detection of epitope on the cell surface and in the
cell interior. Treatment with the secondary Cy3-conjugated donkey
anti-mouse IgG (1:200) was performed as described in Saunders and
Limbird (1997)
. Samples were visualized by confocal microscopy on a
Zeiss Axiovert 135 Micro System LSM (Oberkochen, Germany). The samples
were first visualized in the xy plane, and then in the
xz plane. In the images shown, the bottom three-fourths
represent the xy plane, the conventional view of the cells
as one looks down on them. The white line that is shown in the
xy plane confocal images indicates where the laser took a
cross-section of the cells to generate the z scan. The top one-fourth
of the image represents the xz plane (or z scan), the
cortical section perpendicular to the plane of the cell layer. Images
were analyzed with Showcase software on a Silicon Graphics (Mountain
View, CA) iris indigo workstation.
Steady-State Localization of
2BAR and
2BAR
i3 in MDCKII Cells: Biotinylation and
Photoaffinity Labeling.
The previously described method (Wozniak
and Limbird, 1996
) for quantitating the apical versus basolateral
(versus intracellular) distribution of the wild-type and mutant
2BAR in polarized MDCKII cells was
biotinylation of the apical versus the basolateral surface of cells
grown in Transwell culture, photoaffinity labeling of the functional
2BAR in harvested membranes, detergent
extraction, and isolation of biotinylated receptors via
streptavidin-agarose chromatography. The cell lines grown in Transwell
culture were biotinylated on ice for 30 min with sulfo-NHS biotin to
covalently label the primary amines of the
2BAR. Following membrane preparation, the
2BAR-expressing cell lines (both wild type and
2BAR
i3) were covalently modified with the
photoactivatable
2BAR-selective ligand
[125I]Rau-AzPEC for 1 h at 15°C in the
dark. Photolabeling not attributable to receptor binding was determined
in parallel incubations carried out in the presence of 10 µM
phentolamine, an
-adrenergic receptor antagonist. The
photoaffinity-labeled receptors were then extracted in RIPA buffer.
Streptavidin-agarose chromatography was used to isolated the
biotinylated (and now photoaffinity-labeled) molecules. The fraction of
biotinylated, photoaffinity-labeled
2AR
present on the apical versus basolateral surface was determined
following SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by
autoradiography. The films were then scanned and imported into Adobe Photoshop.
Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Stimulation.
Activation of MAP kinase was assessed as previously described for
HEK293 cells (Schramm and Limbird, 1999
) with a few alterations. Clonal
MDCKII cell lines were plated on 24-mm Transwell filters (Transwell
chambers, 0.4-µm pore size; Costar, Cambridge, MA) at confluency. The
cells were then serum-deprived overnight. On the day of the experiment,
the cells in Transwell culture were moved to a plate warmer kept at
37°C, and the medium was replaced with fresh serum-free DMEM. The
2AR agonist UK-14304 was added for 2 or 10 min
at all final concentration of 1 µM directly to the medium on the
cells and very gently swirled to mix. An equal volume of medium was
added to the control well. After the indicated times, the cells were
washed once with Dulbecco's PBS containing 1 mM
MgCl2 and 0.5 mM CaCl2,
then lysed in SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 2% w/v SDS;
10% glycerol; 50 mM dithiothreitol) supplemented with 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate (Sigma Chemical Co.), 10 U/ml leupeptin (Sigma Chemical
Co.), and 10 U/ml aprotinin (Bayer, Kankakee, IL). The lysates were
transferred to an Eppendorf tube on ice. When all samples were
collected, they were sonicated for 20 s, then placed in a heating
block at 95°C for 5 min. The lysates were then centrifuged in a
microcentrifuge at room temperature for 5 min to remove debris. The
supernatants were assayed in Bio-Rad's protein assay for relative
protein concentration, and equivalent amounts of protein were loaded on
a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis. The gel was run for
160 mAmp-hours, then transferred overnight onto nitrocellulose in
transfer buffer (20% methanol, 0.19 M glycine, 25 mM Tris base) at 33 mV. MAP kinase activation was evaluated with an antibody that
recognizes dually phosphorylated (Thr/Tyr) MAP kinase (catalog no.
V6671; Promega, Madison, WI) and normalized to total MAP kinase with an
antibody that recognizes MAP kinase regardless of its phosphorylation
state (catalog no. 9102; NEB, Beverly, MA). To assess activated MAP kinase content, the nitrocellulose blot was incubated in blocking buffer (1× Tris-buffered saline; 0.1% Tween 20; 5% w/v nonfat dry
milk) for 1 h at room temperature, then probed with Promega's rabbit polyclonal antibody to dually phosphorylated MAP kinase, diluted
1/500 in blocking buffer, for 1 h at room temperature. The blot
was washed three times for 5 min each with Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 (2.42 g/l Tris base, 8.0 g/l NaCl,
0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6) then probed with donkey anti-rabbit horseradish
peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (1/2000 dilution in blocking
buffer) (Amersham) for 1 h at room temperature. The wash protocol
was repeated, and the immunoreactive bands were detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence (Amersham) The blots were then stripped with
stripping buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 100 mM
2-mercaptoethanol) for 30 min at 65°C, and reprobed with antibody to
total MAP kinase (NEB) at a 1/500 dilution in blocking buffer overnight
at 4°C, followed by donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody as
described above. The enhanced chemiluminescence images were scanned
into Adobe Photoshop with a UMAX Astra 600 scanner.
|
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Colchicine Selectively Increases Receptor Density of
2BAR Subtype at Cell Surface.
As seen in Fig. 1A,
overnight treatment with 10 µM colchicine dramatically increased the
density of
2BAR capable of binding ligand, but
did not change functional receptor density significantly for the
2AAR or
2CAR
subtypes. As shown previously, increased
2BAR
binding was observed for colchicine and, to a lesser extent, for
nocodazole, another microtubule-disrupting agent (Saunders and Limbird,
1997
). The increase in receptor density was time dependent; it was not
noted before 2 h and displayed a maximal effect at 15 h.
Changes in
2BAR binding were not observed with
-lumicolchicine, a chemical analog of colchicine that does not disrupt microtubules (data not shown).
2BAR-binding capacity was paralleled by a
detectable increase in receptor fluorescence intensity on the lateral
subdomain of polarized MDCKII cells when
2BAR-expressing cells were pretreated with
colchicine. This intense lateral staining was observed in conjunction
with a decrease in the intracellular staining for the
2BAR. In contrast, no quantitative or
qualitative change in the staining profiles for the
2AAR or
2CAR was
observed following colchicine treatment of polarized MDCKII cells (Fig.
1.B). The observation that the increase in the relative surface to
intracellular distribution of the
2BAR subtype
was not shared by the
2CAR subtype, which has
a significant intracellular density, is consistent with previous findings that the intracellular compartments of the
2BAR and
2CAR
subtypes are functionally distinct (von Zastrow et al., 1993
2BAR binding detected at steady state was due
to an increase in maximal receptor density with little change in
2BAR receptor affinity for the radiolabeled
antagonist [3H]rauwolscine (see legend to Fig.
1A). Radioligand-binding assays with the hydrophobic antagonist
[3H]rauwolscine measure both surface accessible
and intracellular receptors, whether performed in intact cell
incubations or, as in these experiments, in broken cell assays (Fig.
1A). However, the disproportionate
increase in receptor density we detect is an increase in surface
receptor binding, as evidenced not only by the changes in relative
fluorescence intensity of lateral
2BAR (Fig.
1B) but also by the access of the
2BAR to
surface-accessible biotinylation reagents, before (Fig. 2C) or after
colchicine treatment (data not shown). The increase in receptor density
is paralleled by an increased synthesis and delivery of the
2BAR to the basolateral surface after
colchicine treatment (Saunders and Limbird, 1997Colchicine-Induced Increase in Functional Density of
2BAR Subtype Requires Third Intracellular Loop.
Because the third intracellular loop of all three
2AR subtypes interacts with other proteins,
including 14-3-3
(Prezeau et al., 1999
), we wanted to see if the
third intracellular loop of the
2BAR was
required to detect the colchicine-induced increase in receptor density.
We created a mutant
2BAR,
2BAR
i3, in which the third intracellular
loop was deleted, except for the membrane proximal portions responsible
for coupling to G proteins (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). As seen in
Fig. 2A, the colchicine-mediated increase in
2BAR density was not observed in the absence
of the third intracellular loop. Confocal microscopy images of
immunofluorescence staining revealed that this mutant
2BAR
i3 is localized predominantly intracellularly (Fig. 2B), as is confirmed with surface biotinylation and photoaffinity-labeling strategies (Fig. 2C). Surface biotinylation followed by photoaffinity labeling of the
2BAR
with the
2AR antagonist
[125I]Rau-AzPEC demonstrates that, for the
wild-type
2BAR, the receptor is predominantly
in the streptavidin eluates, meaning that the binding detected is
virtually exclusively occurring on the biotinylated cell surface. In
contrast, the photoaffinity-labeled
2BAR
i3 is in the pass throughs of streptavidin-agarose chromatography, indicative of little or no
2BAR
i3 on the
cell surface and therefore little or no biotinylation of the
2BAR
i3 by membrane impermeant reagents
(Fig. 2C).
2BAR
i3 to bind ligand, as demonstrated by
the lack of deposition of detergent-extracted
2BAR
i3 to streptavidin agarose, is an
important finding because it is the first direct documentation that
intracellular
2AR can bind ligands.
Interestingly, despite its almost exclusive intracellular localization,
the
2BAR
i3 still bound agonist (Fig. 2D)
and antagonist (Fig. 2A), coupled to G proteins (Fig. 2D), and
activated MAP kinase activity in a manner comparable to the wild-type
2BAR (Fig. 2E). Guanine nucleotide sensitivity
of receptor affinity for agonist, one measure of functional receptor-G
protein coupling, is most sensitively assessed by examining the ability
of quanine nucleotides, such as the hydrolysis-resistant Gpp(NH)p, to
decrease detectable radiolabeled agonist binding, because Gpp(NH)p
induced lower-affinity agonist-receptor interactions cannot be trapped by filtration assays (Williams and Lefkowitz, 1977
2BAR also is
observed for the
2BAR
i3. Because
heterotrimeric G proteins have been detected in intracellular
compartments (Muntz et al., 1992
2BAR
i3 to activate MAP kinase in polarized MDCKII cells because our own studies (Schramm and Limbird, 1999
2BAR. Nonetheless, these
findings do affirm that the structure of the
2BAR
i3 resembles that of the wild-type
2BAR sufficiently to be able to bind ligand,
activate G proteins, and elicit signaling.
Colchicine-Induced Increase in
2BAR Density Was
Observed Only in Polarized Cells.
The cytoskeletal ultrastructure
of polarized cells is very different from that of nonpolarized cells.
Two main groups of microtubule networks exist in polarized epithelial
cells: a randomly organized group, arranged around the apical area of
the cell, and a polarized network that runs along the lateral sides of
the cells, with the minus ends of the microtubules facing the apical
apex, and the plus ends facing the basal side. Because this disparate
arrangement is not present in nonpolarized cells, we evaluated whether
the colchicine-induced increase in
2BAR
density also could manifest itself in nonpolarized cells, both those
which had the potential to polarize under the appropriate culture
conditions (MDCKII cells), and those that do not possess the potential
to do so, such as COSM6 and HEK293 cells. As seen in Fig.
3, the ability of colchicine to increase
2BAR density is most readily detected in
MDCKII cells grown in Transwell culture to a functionally and
morphologically polarized state (Nelson and Veshnock, 1987
). In
Transwell culture, both the basal surface, via the nitrocellulous
filter, and the apical surface have direct access to nutrients. When
the cells are plated densely on plastic, close apposition of the cells
forces the cells to form a tight monolayer at the lateral sides of the cells in a pseudopolarized phenotype, but the basal surface does not
readily get access to medium. As seen in Fig. 3, the
colchicine-mediated increase in receptor density is diminished in
MDCKII cells grown on plastic compared with cells grown in Transwell
culture, i.e., when greater polarization is achieved. Alternatively,
when MDCKII cells are plated sparsely on plastic (i.e., 20-40%
confluent), there is no detectable effect of colchicine on
2BAR density, in parallel with the absence of
MDCKII cell polarization under these conditions (Nelson and Veshnock,
1987
). The necessity of a polarized cell environment to detect
colchicine-evoked increases in
2BAR density is
further evidenced by the lack of a colchicine-induced effect on steady
state
2BAR density in either COSM6 cells
transiently expressing the
2BAR, or in HEK293
cells permanently expressing the
2BAR (Fig.
3).
|
Colchicine-Induced Increase in
2BAR Density Is Not
Dependent on Functional Coupling to G Proteins.
We explored the
possibility that the colchicine-induced increase in
2BAR density might require active coupling of
the receptor to G proteins because multiple, independent studies have
detected
- (Roychowdhury et al., 1999
) and 
- (Carlson et al.,
1986
; Roychowdhury and Rasenick, 1997
) subunits of G proteins
associated with the cytoskeleton. Overnight treatment of the MDCKII
cells expressing
2BAR with pertussis toxin
(200 ng/ml), under conditions previously established to maximally
ADP-ribosylate Gi (Keefer and Limbird, 1993
), did
not eliminate the effect of colchicine to increase
2BAR density, as seen in Fig.
4A. The incubation with pertussis toxin
was sufficient to uncouple the
2BAR from G
proteins, as reflected by the loss of guanine nucleotide modulation of
receptor affinity for the radiolabeled agonist
[125I]PIC in pertussis-toxin treated
preparations (Fig. 4B) and the decrease in the ratio of
[125I]PIC/[3H]rauwolscine
binding to that detected in preparations from control cells incubated
in the presence of Gpp(NH)p. These findings demonstrate that functional
coupling of the
2BAR to pertussis
toxin-sensitive G proteins is not required for colchicine-induced
increases in
2BAR density at the cell surface.
Because the low molecular weight GTP-binding protein rho has been shown
to be involved in cytoskeletal protein reorganization in response to
extracellular signals (Takaishi et al., 1997
), we examined whether
pretreatment of cells with 10 µg/ml botulinum C3 exoenzyme, which ADP
ribosylates and blocks its function, altered colchicine-induced
increases in
2BAR density. Botulinum toxin had
no effect on the ability of colchicine to modulate
2BAR density (data not shown).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study of the mechanisms that govern trafficking of receptors
and signal transduction molecules is a rapidly emerging field, particularly in polarized cells where the correct localization of G
protein-coupled receptors at polarized cell surfaces, for example, is
crucial for the appropriate vectorial functioning of the cell. The
polarized cytoskeleton plays an important role in the trafficking and
eventual localization of the membrane proteins at their cell surface
domain. The cytoskeleton has been described as viscoelastic: it
provides a continuum of mechanical coupling throughout the cell
that fluctuates as a function of the remodeling of the cytoskeleton
(Janmey, 1998
). These mechanical influences include changes in ion
channel activity at the plasma membrane and propagation of mechanical
stresses from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm. The actin filaments
and the microtubule network that comprise the major parts of the
cytoskeleton have different but sometimes sequential functions in the
trafficking of proteins in their target cells. Actin filaments are
involved in cell polarity (Molitoris, 1997
), endocytosis (Hirasawa et
al., 1998
), exocytosis, and translocation (Fincham et al., 1996
).
Microtubules are involved in two-way trafficking between the
endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi compartment (Rahkila et al., 1997
),
between the endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane (Robin et al.,
1995
), in signaling molecule processing and/or targeting (Thissen et
al., 1997
), and in some endocytic pathways involving late endosomes
(Durrbach et al., 1996
; Faigle et al., 1998
). Moreover, microtubules
have been shown to be critical for the internalization of some GPCRs, such as the complement receptor (Allen and Aderem, 1996
), whereas other
GPCRs, such as the
1BAR, instead require an
intact actin filament network for internalization (Hirasawa et al.,
1998
). What has emerged over the past two decades is an understanding that the role of the cytoskeletal components can be different for the
same protein in a variety of different cell backgrounds, and
conversely, vary for similarly related proteins in the same cell type.
We are interested in elucidating the mechanisms conferring basolateral
or apical localization of GPCRs in polarized cells. We previously have
shown that the basolateral localization of the three
2AR subtypes is not dependent on an intact
microtubule network, i.e., depolymerization of microtubules with
colchicine or nocodazole does not perturb their basolateral orientation
in MDCKII cells (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). In contrast, the
preferential apical targeting and localization of the
A1AdoR in renal epithelia (Saunders et al., 1996
)
is microtubule dependent because depolymerization of the microtubule
network leads to preferentially more A1AdoR delivered to and localized at the basolateral surface (Saunders and
Limbird, 1997
). In studying the trafficking of these GPCRs in the
presence of cytoskeletal disrupting agents, we observed that 2- to
4-fold more
2BAR was delivered to the cell
surface in the presence of colchicine, based on metabolic labeling and surface biotinylation studies (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
), whereas the
surface delivery and steady-state density of the
2AAR and
2CAR
subtypes was not affected by the same concentrations of colchicine. The
aim of these studies was to further explore the mechanism for this
2BAR subtype-specific colchicine-dependent increase in receptor density.
The observation of increased receptor delivery to the cell surface in
the presence of colchicine from our earlier work (Saunders and Limbird,
1997
) is consistent with the increased immunofluorescence intensity at
the cell surface (Fig. 1B) observed in the presence of colchicine and
the increase in functional binding capacity (Fig. 1A). The increased
fluorsecence intensity at the cell surface for the
2BAR subtype was paralleled by a decrease in
the intracellular labeling characteristic of
2BAR detected and quantified in confocal micrographs (Saunders and Limbird, 1997
). In contrast, colchicine treatment did not lead to a decrease in intracellular fluorescence intensity for the
2CAR subtype in the presence
of colchicine (Fig. 1A), supporting previous interpretations that the
intracellular pools of
2BAR and the
2CAR are morphologically and functionally distinct (von Zastrow et al., 1993
; Wozniak and Limbird, 1996
).
The selective effect of colchicine on
2BAR,
but not the
2AAR or the
2CAR subtypes, contributes to the growing
evidence of differences in trafficking itineraries between these highly similar subtypes in agonist-occupied as well as unoccupied states (von
Zastrow et al., 1993
; Daunt et al., 1997
). Thus, the
2BAR is randomly delivered to apical and
basolateral surfaces in polarized MDCKII cells, but selectively
retained on the basolateral surface, in contrast to the direct delivery
of both the
2AAR and
2CAR subtypes solely to the basolateral
surface. After agonist occupancy, the
2BAR,
but not the
2AAR or
2CAR subtypes, rapidly and extensively is
removed from the cell surface in a number of heterologous cell backgrounds (Eason and Liggett, 1992
; Kurose and Lefkowitz, 1994
; Schramm and Limbird, 1999
). Removal of the third intracellular loop
renders the
2BAR incapable of tethering
to the plasma membrane, suggesting that the loop of the
2BAR is involved in cell surface membrane
anchoring, as has been shown for the
2AAR in MDCKII cells (Keefer et al., 1994
;
Edwards and Limbird, 1999
). The inability of colchicine to mobilize the
almost exclusively intracellularly localized
2BAR
i3 (Fig. 2) and to increase the density
of this mutant receptor suggests that there may be a direct interaction of a microtubule-based cytoskeleton with the third intracellular loop
of the
2BAR that contributes to the mechanism
by which colchicine increases
2BAR density at
the basolateral surface of polarized MDCKII cells. That the effect of
colchicine is only observed in polarized cells (Fig. 3) raises the
possibility that the protein-protein interactions involved in this
phenomenon include proteins that are uniquely synthesized following
cell polarization or are that are redistributed to a particular
compartment, such as underlying the basolateral surface, on polarization.
The extant literature provides examples where cytoskeletal
depolymerization decreases activity of receptors, channels, or enzymes
within cells (Hein et al., 1995
; Brown et al., 1997
; Molitoris, 1997
;
Cutaia et al., 1998
; Schober et al., 1998
), as well as evidence that
depolymerization can increase activity. For example, actin depolymerization (such as following exposure to cytochalasin D) has
been demonstrated to increase Na+ channel
activity in renal epithelial cells (Cantiello et al., 1991
) and
CFTR-mediated Cl
current in adenocarcinoma
cells (Prat et al., 1995
). We did not evaluate the effects of
cytochalasin D on
2BAR trafficking and density
because this agent leads to loss of polarized expression of a number of
endogenous surface proteins in MDCKII cells (Saunders and Limbird,
1997
). In contrast, colchicine treatment does not lead to
redistribution of the EGFR, a basolateral surface marker protein, or of
gp135, an apical marker protein, in MDCKII cells (Saunders and Limbird,
1997
).
The present studies raise the possibility that GPCR distribution,
density, and/or function may be altered in disease states where the
cellular cytoskeleton is altered. Myocardial ischemia is one such
example (Hein et al., 1995
). Another is hypoxia in pulmonary
endothelial cells; the actin filament cytoskeleton is significantly
altered after prolonged hypoxic exposure and, as a consequence, its
human pulmonary arterial endothelial cell
Na+/H+ antiport activity is
decreased (Cutaia et al., 1998
). Ischemia-reperfusion injury also is
associated with severe alterations in the cytoskeletal organization of
multiple target cells, including polarized renal tubular epithelial
cells, where redistribution of a number of polarized membrane transport
proteins impairs transepithelial function (Brown et al., 1997
;
Molitoris, 1997
; Schober et al., 1998
). In these, and analogous
settings, it is reasonable to speculate that disrupted microtubule
networks could alter GPCR functional density in general and
2BAR density in particular. If
2BARs in other polarized cells, such as
neurons, are similarly susceptible to microtubule depolymerization,
then altered trans-synaptic efficiency could occur in a
number of settings where disrupted microtubule structure or function is
a pathological correlate.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Carol Ann Bonner for her technical assistance in the development and maintenance of MDCKII cell lines and for her assessment of receptor-binding density in MDCKII cells. This work was supported by Grants DK 43879 from the National Institutes of Health (to L.E.L.) and HL 07323 from the Training Programs in Hypertension Research (to C.S.).
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 15, 1999; Accepted October 7, 1999
1 Current address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78284-7760.
Send reprint requests to: Lee E. Limbird, Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, D 3300 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-6600. E-mail: lee.limbird{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; AR, adrenergic receptor; A1AdoR, A1 adenosine receptor; HA, hemagglutinin; HEK, human embryonic kidney; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; [125I]PIC, p-[125I]iodoclonidine; MAP, mitogen-activated protein.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2A adrenergic receptor.
J Biol Chem
274:
16331-16336
2-adrenergic receptor.
Mol Pharmacol
38:
214-221[Abstract].
isoform of 14-3-3 proteins interacts with the third intracellular loop of different
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes.
J Biol Chem
274:
13462-13479