|
|
|
|
Vol. 57, Issue 2, 219-231, February 2000
1b-Adrenergic Receptor:
Effects on Receptor Isomerization and Activation
Institut de Pharmacologie et Toxicologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.S., S.M.-K., L.A., M.N.-T., S.C.); Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy (T.C.); and Dipartimento di Chimica, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (F.F., P.G.D.B.).
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have suggested previously that both the negatively and positively
charged residues of the highly conserved Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr (E/DRY) motif
play an important role in the activation process of the
1b-adreneric receptor (AR). In this study, R143 of the E/DRY sequence in the
1b-AR was mutated into several
amino acids (Lys, His, Glu, Asp, Ala, Asn, and Ile). The
charge-conserving mutation of R143 into lysine not only preserved the
maximal agonist-induced response of the
1b-AR, but it
also conferred high degree of constitutive activity to the receptor.
Both basal and agonist-induced phosphorylation levels were
significantly increased for the R143K mutant compared with those of the
wild-type receptor. Other substitutions of R143 resulted in receptor
mutants with either a small increase in constitutive activity (R143H
and R143D), impairment (R143H, R143D), or complete loss of
receptor-mediated response (R143E, R143A, R143N, R143I). The R413E
mutant displayed a small, but significant increase in basal
phosphorylation despite being severely impaired in receptor-mediated response. Interestingly, all the arginine mutants displayed increased affinity for agonist binding compared with the wild-type
1b-AR. A correlation was found between the extent of the
affinity shift and the intrinsic activity of the agonists. The analysis
of the receptor mutants using the allosteric ternary complex model in conjunction with the results of molecular dynamics simulations on the
receptor models support the hypothesis that mutations of R143 can drive
the isomerization of the
1b-AR into different states,
highlighting the crucial role of this residue in the activation process
of the receptor.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
1b-adrenergic receptor (AR) belongs to the
superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), which transduce
signals across the cell membrane. Stimulation of the
1b-AR by catecholamines can activate proteins
of the Gq/11 family, resulting in phospholipase C-mediated production
of inositol phosphates (IP).
All GPCR sequences share the presence of seven transmembrane (TM)
-helices connected by alternating intracellular and extracellular hydrophilic loops (Wess, 1997
). The seven TM helices contribute to the
formation of the ligand binding pocket, whereas amino acid sequences of
the intracellular loops mediate the interaction of the receptor with a
number of signaling and regulatory proteins, including G proteins,
arrestins, and GPCR kinases.
Within the large superfamily of GPCRs, a small number of amino acids
are highly conserved throughout evolution. The Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr motif
(E/DRY motif) located at the cytosolic end of helix 3 occurs in the
majority of GPCRs belonging to the "rhodopsin-like" subfamily. The
high degree of conservation of this motif suggests that it must play an
important role in receptor function. Indeed, several experimental and
modeling studies highlighted that both negatively and positively
charged residues of the E/DRY are involved in the activation process of
GPCRs (Oliveira et al., 1994
; Wess, 1997
).
Recent studies have demonstrated that mutations of the aspartate of the
E/DRY motif can induce variable levels of constitutive (agonist-independent) activity for rhodopsin (Cohen et al., 1993
; Acharya and Karnik, 1996
), the
1b-AR (Scheer
et al., 1996
, Scheer et al., 1997
), and the V2 receptor for vasopressin
(Morin et al., 1998
). Interestingly, mutations of the homologous
aspartate in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor into
asparagine enhanced the agonist-induced receptor response (Arora et
al., 1997
). In the muscarinic M1 receptor, some mutations of the
homologous aspartate dramatically decreased receptor expression (Lu et
al., 1997
). However, for those receptor mutants that were expressed,
the agonist-induced receptor response was similar to if not greater
than that of the wild-type receptor.
Site-directed mutagenesis studies that have targeted the conserved
arginine of E/DRY in different GPCRs have so far mainly identified
receptor mutants modestly or severely impaired in their ability to
mediate a signaling response. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that
mutations of this conserved arginine impaired the response mediated by
GPCRs linked to different signaling pathways, including rhodopsin
(Franke et al., 1992
; Acharya and Karnik, 1996
), the M1 and M2
cholinergic receptors (Zhu et al., 1994
; Jones et al., 1995
), the V2
vasopressin receptor (Rosenthal et al., 1993
), the
1b-AR (Scheer et al., 1996
), and the
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) (Arora et al., 1997
;
Ballestreros et al., 1998
). These findings suggest that the invariant
arginine plays a pivotal role in receptor-mediated activation of
downstream signaling proteins. However, the mechanistic role played by
the arginine of the E/DRY sequence in receptor activation remains unknown.
Recently, we combined experimental and computer-simulated mutagenesis
of the
1b-AR to build a theoretical model of
receptor activation (Scheer et al., 1996
; Scheer et al., 1997
). The
comparative molecular dynamics (MD) analysis of the wild-type
1b-AR and several constitutively active
receptor mutants highlighted a network of hydrogen-bonding interactions
among conserved polar residues forming a "polar pocket" near the
cytosol (N63 in helix 1, D91 in helix 2, N344 and Y348 in helix 7) and
R143 of the E/DRY motif. We suggested that 1) this set of interactions
constrains the receptor in its ground state by controlling the degree
of cytosolic exposure attainable by R143 and 2) the main role of R143
is to mediate receptor activation, allowing amino acids of the
intracellular loops to attain the right configuration for the formation
of a site with docking complementarity with the G protein.
In this study, we performed a series of conservative and
nonconservative mutations of R143 to further elucidate its role in the
activation process of the
1b-AR. Various
substitutions of R143 resulted in receptor mutants with either
increased constitutive activity, impairment, or complete loss of
receptor-mediated response. Interestingly, all the mutants displayed
increased affinity for agonist binding compared with the wild-type
1b-AR. A correlation was found between the
extent of the affinity shift and the intrinsic activity of the
agonists. The analysis of the receptor mutants conducted using the
allosteric ternary complex model suggests that mutations of R143 can
drive the
1b-AR into different states, supporting the crucial role of this residue in the activation process
of the receptor.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
COS-7 Cell Culture and Transfections.
COS-7 cells were grown
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum and gentamicin (100 µg/ml) and transfected using
the DEAE-dextran method. The cDNA encoding the hamster
1b-AR (Cotecchia et al., 1992
) and its mutants
were subcloned in pRK5. For inositol phosphate determination, COS-7
cells (0.15 × 106) were plated in 12-well
plates. For phosphorylation assays, cells were plated in 100-mm dishes
(3 × 106 cells). The transfected DNA
encoding the receptors was 0.5 to 3 µg/106 cells.
Ligand Binding.
Membrane preparations derived from cells
expressing the
1b-AR or its mutants and ligand
binding assays using
[125I]iodo-2-[
-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-ethylaminomethyl]tetralone
(HEAT) were performed as described previously (Cotecchia et al., 1992
). Prazosin (10
6 M) was used to determine
nonspecific binding. [125I]HEAT concentration
was 250 pM for measuring receptor expression at a single concentration
and 80 pM for competition binding analysis. Saturation analysis and
competition curves were analyzed using Prism 2.0 (GraphPAD Software,
San Diego, CA).
IP Measurement.
Transfected cells were labeled for 12 h
with myo-[3H]inositol at 4 µCi/ml in
inositol-free DMEM supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum. Cells were
then preincubated for 10 min in PBS containing 20 mM LiCl, and then
stimulated for 45 min with epinephrine. Total inositol phosphates were
extracted and separated as described previously (Cotecchia et al.,
1992
).
32P-Labeling and Immunoprecipitation of the
Receptors.
Transfected COS-7 cells were equilibrated in
phosphate-free DMEM for 2 h and then incubated in the same buffer
containing 32Pi (0.2 mCi/ml) for 2 h at 37°C. The incubation was then continued in
the absence or presence of epinephrine as indicated and
immunoprecipitation of the phosphorylated receptors was performed as
described previously (Lattion et al., 1994
). After autoradiography, the
32P content of the gel slices containing the
immunoprecipitated receptor was quantified (cpm) by liquid
scintillation counting. A separate set of dishes were incubated under
similar conditions, but in the absence of
32Pi to measure receptor
binding. The receptors were expressed at similar levels and the
32P content (cpm) of different gel slices was
directly compared for statistical analysis.
1b-AR and its mutants. Membranes
from COS-7 cells expressing the receptors were photoaffinity-labeled with [125I]iodoazidoprazosin as described
previously (Lattion et al., 1994
1b-AR. After autoradiography, the
125I content (cpm) of the gel slices containing
the photoaffinity-labeled receptors before and after immunoprecipation
were counted to calculate the efficiency of immunoprecipation. The
percentage of immunoprecipitated receptor was 89% for the antibody
against the carboxyl-terminal sequence used at 1:100 dilution and 70%
for that against the amino-terminal sequence at 1:50 dilution. The
efficiency of immunoprecipitation was similar for the wild-type and
mutated receptors. The experiments described in this study were
performed using the antiserum against the carboxyl-terminal sequence of
the receptor.
Building of the Receptor Models and MD Simulations.
Modeling
of the
1b-AR was achieved following an ab initio procedure as
described recently (Fanelli et al., 1998
). The building of the receptor
model consisted of an iterative procedure starting with a comparative
MD study on the transmembrane domains of seven GPCRs (Fanelli et al.,
1995
) The starting arrangement of the seven helix bundle was
successively modified and the model was complicated progressively by
adding the intracellular and extracellular domains. A many-step
iterative procedure, characterized by the experimental validation of
the model in each of the upgrading steps, was employed. The most
stringent validation of the model was achieved by challenging its
capability to interpret and predict the functional properties of an
ever-increasing number of
1b-AR mutants. The latest version of the
model used in this study includes new experimental information derived
from the electron micrographs of 3-D frog rhodopsin crystals (Unger et
al., 1997
). The tilt of the helices in the
1b-AR input arrangement
previously obtained was slightly modified according to the tilt angles
of the seven helices estimated from the map of frog rhodopsin (Baldwin
et al., 1997
; Unger et al., 1997
). In addition, the third intracellular
loop (i3) of the
1b-AR was completed by the addition of residues 236 to 284 (Fanelli et al., 1999b
). Different input arrangements were built
performing translations and rotations of the helices and loops, as well
as modifications of side-chain torsion angles. Among the large number
of arrangements tested, we selected the input structure of the
1b-AR
that, upon MD simulations, produced an average arrangement showing the
best agreement with the experimental data available on GPCRs together with high-quality check scores. The selected input structure of the
wild-type
1b-AR was used to produce the input structures for the
mutants using the molecular graphics package QUANTA 96 (Molecular
Simulations, Waltham, MA).
= 4r) and a 12-Å nonbonded cutoff distance were chosen. The "united atom approximation" was used for
computational efficiency.
The minimized coordinates of the wild-type
1b-AR and of the A293E
constitutively active mutant were then used as starting points for 1050 ps of MD runs. The systems were heated to 300 K with 5°C rise per
6000 steps by randomly assigning velocities from the Gaussian
distribution. After heating, the system was allowed to equilibrate for
34 ps and velocities were scaled by a single factor. The system was
then subjected to 1ns of MD simulation and the reported results were
collected every 0.5 ps. The bond lengths involving hydrogen atoms were
constrained according to the SHAKE algorithm, allowing an integration
time step of 0.001 ps. Integration of Newton's equation of motion was
done using the Verlet algorithm. The secondary structure of the
seven-helix bundle was preserved using NOE constraints with a
scaling factor of 10. Different combinations of distance constraints
were tested. These constraints were applied between the backbone oxygen
atom of residue i and the backbone nitrogen atom of residue i + 4, excluding prolines. Because the first 100 ps were representative of the
1-ns period of simulation for both the wild-type
1b-AR and the A293E
constitutively active mutant, for all the other mutants considered in
this work, MD runs were reduced to 150 ps, using the same heating and
equilibration setup as that employed for the longer simulations.
The structures, averaged over the first 100 ps of the equilibrated MD
trajectory, were then minimized and used for comparative analysis.
Solvent-accessible surfaces were computed with the QUANTA package.
Statistics. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. Statistical significance was assessed by paired Student's t test.
Materials. COS-7 cells were from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD); DMEM, gentamicin, fetal bovine serum and restriction enzymes from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY); Taq polymerase from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany); 125I]HEAT and [3H]inositol from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA); epinephrine, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, methoxamine, oxymetazoline, and dopamine were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); and cirazoline and prazosin from Research Biochemical International (Natick, MA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutation of R143 into Alanine Counteracts the Effect of
Constitutively Activating Mutations.
We previously reported that
the mutation of R143 to alanine profoundly impaired the
1b-AR-mediated IP response (Scheer et al.,
1996
). To further challenge the role of R143 in receptor activation, we
introduced the mutation of R143 to alanine into either the D142A or the
A293E constitutively active receptor. The constitutive activity of the
receptor double mutants D142A/R143A and A293E/R143A was dramatically
reduced compared with that of the D142A and A293E receptors. In
addition, the epinephrine-induced IP response mediated by the
D142A/R143A and A293E/R143A mutants was profoundly reduced compared
with that of the wild-type
1b-AR (Table
1). Thus, the effect induced by the
inactivating mutation of R143 into alanine was dominant over that
induced by activating mutations of either D142 or A293, resulting in
significant impairment of both the constitutive and agonist-induced
activity of the receptor.
|
Effects of Mutations of R143 on the Receptor-Mediated IP Response. To further investigate its mechanistic role in receptor function, R143 was mutated into several amino acids differing in their charge, size, or hydropathy index (Table 1). All the mutated receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells at levels between 0.2 and 0.6 pmol/mg of protein. The receptor mutants were tested for their ability to mediate epinephrine-stimulated IP accumulation in transfected COS-7 cells.
The charge-conserving mutation of R143 into lysine not only preserved the maximal agonist-induced response of the
1b-AR, but also conferred high degree of
constitutive activity to the receptor (Table 1 and Fig.
1). In cells expressing the R143K mutant,
the basal IP accumulation was over 200% above that of cells expressing
the wild-type receptor. This constitutive activity of the R143K mutant
was inhibited by the
1-antagonist prazosin (results not shown). The R143H mutant, carrying also a
charge-conserving mutation of R143, displayed a small degree of
agonist-independent activity and was modestly impaired in its ability
to mediate the epinephrine-induced IP response (Table 1 and Fig. 1).
|
Phosphorylation Properties of Receptors Mutated at Position
143.
A recent study reported that moderately uncoupled rhodopsin
mutants carrying mutations of the arginine of the E/DRY motif displayed
a higher level of light-induced phosphorylation than that of the
wild-type receptor (Shi et al., 1998
). Two of these mutants also
displayed enhanced interactions with rhodopsin kinase and arrestin in
the absence of 11-cis-retinal. These findings suggested the
intriguing hypothesis that the lower level of transducin activation
might result from enhanced phosphorylation and desensitization of the
rhodopsin mutants. A small increase in basal phosphorylation was also
reported for a V2 vasopressin receptor mutant, in which the mutation of
the homologous arginine to histidine resulted in receptor uncoupling
(Innamorati et al., 1997
). Thus, to further characterize the properties
of the
1b-AR mutants carrying mutations of
R143, we measured the phosphorylation of the R143A, R143E, and R143K
receptors in intact cells.
1b-AR. The
enhanced basal phosphorylation observed for the R143K mutant is
reminiscent of the properties of other constitutively active adrenergic
receptor mutants (Ren et al., 1993
|
1b-AR displayed opposing
phosphorylation features (basal phosphorylation was enhanced for the
A293E, but not for the D142A mutant) (Mhaouty-Kodja et al., 1999Structural-Dynamic Features of the Receptors Carrying Mutations of
R143.
To further elucidate the structural and dynamic role of
R143, MD simulations were performed on the
1b-AR model carrying mutations at R143. We
have used a recently described upgraded three-dimensional model of the
1b-AR that incorporates several new pieces of
experimental information available on GPCRs (Fanelli et al., 1998
,
1999b
). To gain further insight into the receptor-G protein interface, the up-graded
1b-AR model included the entire
i3 loop of the receptor (residues 236-284).
1b-AR on the one hand and with those of the constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E on the other. Consistent with the model of
1b-AR activation
previously proposed, the average minimized structure of the wild-type
receptor in the upgraded model is stabilized by a network of H-bonding
interactions involving highly conserved polar amino acids in the helix
bundle. Among these, the charge reinforced H-bonding interaction
between D91 (helix 2) and R143 (helix 3) constitutes one of the
constraining interactions in the receptor ground state. In the
constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E, the motions of the
helices, although triggered differently, induce the breakage of the
D91-R143 interaction. Furthermore, there is a rearrangement of the
cytosolic domains characterized by the opening of a solvent exposed
site formed by the second intracellular loop (i2), the cytosolic
extension of helices 5 and 6 as well as amino acids 242 to 259 forming
an
-helical segment in the middle of the i3 loop (Fig.
3). We recently proposed that this
crevice, which is characterized by a large, solvent-accessible surface,
represents a site with good electrostatic and shape complementarity
with the G protein (Fanelli et al., 1999b
|
1b-AR-mediated IP
response (Table 1).
As shown in Fig. 3, substitution of R143 with lysine produces an
average arrangement that shares some structural similarities with the
constitutively active mutants A293E and D142A (i.e., the cytosolic
exposure of R288 and K291) as well as the configuration of the
cytosolic crevice formed by the i2 loop, the cytosolic extension of
helices 5 and 6, and the stretch of amino acids 242 to 259 in the
middle of the i3 loop (Fig. 3). In fact, the shorter amino acid side
chain that results from mutation of the arginine to lysine does not
favor the interaction of this residue with D91 (helix 2), thus
mimicking the breakage of the D91-R143 interaction observed in the
A293E and D142A mutants.
Similar structural changes are also found in the weakly constitutively
active mutant R143H, in which the protonated H143 is surrounded by a
cluster of aromatic amino acids (F83, Y144, Y348, and F355), whereas
D91 is involved in H-bonding interactions with N63 and N344 (results
not shown). This interaction pattern results in the opening of a site
in the cytosolic domains that is similar to that found in the
structures of the constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E.
However, the lower constitutive activity of R143H with respect to R143K
may be attributable, at least in part, to the fact that a fraction of
uncharged H143 might exist at physiological pH because it is close to
positively charged amino acids that may contribute to decrease its
pKa.
In the R143D mutant, which also displays a low level of constitutive
activity, the interactions of D91 resemble those found in the R143H
mutant (results not shown). However, although the cytosolic domains of
R143D reveal a site exposed to the solvent, K291 in the i3 loop is less
exposed to the cytosol than in the highly constitutively active mutant
R143K because it interacts with the aspartate substituted at position
143. This might, at least in part, explain why the R143D mutant is only
weakly constitutively active.
A striking feature of all the activation-deficient mutants (R143E,
R143A, R143I, and R143N) is their failure to permit the translocation
of positively charged amino acids of the i3 loop (i.e., R288, K291)
toward the cytosol. In the case of R143E shown in Fig. 3, the i2 and
portions of the i3 loop seem to delimit a site accessible to the
solvent reminiscent of that observed in the active structures. However,
two main features predict that the R143E mutant is inactive: 1) K291 is
buried because of its interaction with E143 and 2) the conformation of
the i3 loop is such that the stretch of amino acids 242 to 259 is
arranged differently than that of the active receptor forms and might
therefore not create a good electrostatic and shape complementarity
with the G protein.
In accordance with the experimental findings (Table 1), the
computer-simulated structures of the mutants D142A/R143A or A293E/R143A displayed none of the structural/dynamic "hallmarks" of either of
the constitutively active mutants, D142A or A293E (results not shown).
This suggests that the integrity of R143 is crucial in maintaining the
structural-dynamic features of the receptor, which correlate with the
high levels of constitutive activity induced by the mutations at either
position 142 or 293.
The mechanistic role of the arginine belonging to the E/DRY motif has
also been the focus of a recent study on the receptor for the GnRH-R
(Ballestreros et al., 1998
1b-AR, the arginine of the E/DRY sequence is not engaged in a
strong salt bridge interaction. Our hypothesis is consistent with the
experimental results of the present study showing that replacing the
fully conserved arginine with lysine, histidine, and aspartate, which
are unlikely to interact with the conserved aspartate on helix 2, can
result in constitutively active forms of the
1b-AR. Our hypothesis
is also in accordance with recent findings showing that the mutations
of the arginine of E/DRY with alanine produces a constitutively active
form of the oxytocin receptor (Fanelli et al., 1999aEffects of Mutations at Position R143 on the Ligand Binding
Properties of the Receptor.
To further characterize the receptor
mutants at R143, ligand binding studies were performed on membranes
from COS-7 cells expressing the wild-type
1b-AR or the mutated receptors (Table 1).
Saturation binding analysis of [125I]HEAT
indicated that the Kd values were similar
at the wild-type and mutated receptors, ranging from 80 to 120 pM
(results of two independent experiments not shown). In contrast, the
affinity of various agonists differed among the receptors.
-adrenergic
agonists compared with the wild-type
1b-AR
(Table 1). Consistent with its increased binding affinity, the potency
of epinephrine at the R143K mutant was greater than at the wild-type receptor (EC50 values from one experiment were
2.9 × 10
8 M and 5 × 10
9 M at the
1b-AR and
R143K mutant, respectively). In contrast, no significant differences
were observed for the different receptors in the binding affinities of
the antagonist prazosin (results not shown).
Surprisingly, the inactive mutants R143E and R143I exhibited the
highest affinity for agonists in this series of receptor mutants. In
particular, the affinity of the R143E mutant for epinephrine was
250-fold higher than that of the wild-type
1b-AR and even 10-fold higher than that of the
constitutively active receptor R143K. Thus, the agonist-binding
affinities of the R143 mutants seem to be negatively correlated with
their activation properties. As shown in Table 1, the higher the
affinity of the receptor mutant for catecholamine, the lower its
ability to mediate agonist-induced IP response and vice versa.
Comparison of the Constitutively Active Receptors R143K and A293E
with the Inactive Mutant R143E.
To better understand the nature of
the increased affinity for agonist binding of the activation-defective
R143 mutants, we compared the ligand-binding properties of the inactive
receptor R143E with those of the two constitutively active mutants,
R143K and A293E. First, we assessed the intrinsic activities of seven structurally different agonists; second, we measured the binding affinity of the various agonists at the wild-type
1b-AR, R143E, R143K, and A293E receptors.
1b-AR (Table
2). It has been reported previously that
both in human embryonic kidney 293 and SK-N-MC cells permanently
transfected with the cDNA encoding the
1b-AR,
the maximal IP response to norepineprhine was positively correlated
with the expression of the receptor (Theroux et al., 1996
1b-AR (results not
shown). These observations seem to rule out the presence of receptor
reserve in cells permanently expressing the
1b-AR, suggesting that the measurement of
intrinsic activity reflects the efficacy of different ligands.
|
1b-AR.
Interestingly, for all the receptor mutants, there was a direct
relation between the intrinsic activity of each agonist and the extent
of its affinity shift (i.e., the ratio between the
Ki value at the mutated and wild-type
1b-ARs). The higher the intrinsic activity of
the agonist, the greater was the affinity shift induced by the various
mutations (Fig. 4). The two
constitutively active mutations, A293E and R143K, produced similar
affinity shifts for all the agonists tested, whereas the shifts induced
by R143E were much greater. The affinity of epinephrine for the
wild-type as well as for the three receptor mutants (A293E, R143K, and
R143E) was not influenced by 10
4 M
guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (results not shown).
|
Analysis of the Relation Between Ligand Intrinsic Activity and
Shift of Affinity.
As explained in the Appendix, the
two-state allosteric model of receptor activation predicts that if a
mutation alters the stability constant for the conversion of the
inactive (R) to the active state (R*) (and thus basal activity), it
also changes ligand binding affinity. The extent and direction of such
an "allosteric" shift in affinity depends on ligand efficacy;
therefore, it must be related to the intrinsic activity of the ligand
(Samama et al., 1993
).
) controls the
proportion of GPCR available for signaling, whereas the affinity
constant M determines the extent of overall receptor association to G. Mechanistically, a reduction of
at constant M can be interpreted as
an impairment of the process that couples R-G association to G protein
activation. As illustrated in the Appendix, if J
and
are changed into opposite directions, being M constant, the
result is a divergent effect on ligand affinity and ligand-mediated
activation (Fig. 6). Thus, an alternative explanation is that the R143E
mutation enhances J to a much greater extent than R143K and A293E
mutations, but unlike those constitutive activating mutations, it also
produces a dramatic reduction of the constant
. This can produce
very high agonist affinity and total loss of receptor-mediated
signaling, as shown by simulations according to the model (Fig. 6).
From a structural point of view, it is equivalent to state that R143E may be converted into a state that fully matches the high-affinity agonist binding conformation and also binds to the G protein, but in
which the network of interactions that transmit conformational perturbation through the G protein interface is disrupted.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we combined site-directed mutagenesis of the
1b-AR, computational simulations of receptor
dynamics, and thermodynamic analysis of the receptor's pharmacological
properties to provide hypotheses about the role played by R143
belonging to the conserved E/DRY motif in the activation process of the receptor.
Role of R143 in Receptor Activation.
Several lines of evidence
support the conclusion that R143 of the
1b-AR
is an important residue in the process of receptor activation. First,
the inactivating mutation of R143 to alanine severely impaired both the
constitutive and agonist-induced activity of the A293E and D142A
mutants (Table 1). Secondly, a number of mutations of R143 resulted in
a profound impairment of the agonist-induced receptor response (Fig.
1). Finally, the fact that the R143A and R143E mutants were unable to
undergo agonist-induced phosphorylation seems to exclude enhanced
phosphorylation and desensitization as the main mechanism underlying
the decrease in the receptor-mediated response for the mutants carrying
neutral or negative amino acids at position 143.
1b-AR is required for the agonist-induced
receptor-mediated response. In fact, mutations of R143 with either
neutral or negatively charged amino acids (Ala, Asn, Ile, Asp, and Glu)
profoundly impaired the agonist-induced receptor response, which was
preserved only in the R143K mutant (Fig. 1).
R143 Plays a Role in the Isomerization of the Receptor.
Our
findings provide evidence that mutations of R143 enhance the stability
constant (J), which governs the transition of the
1b-AR between the inactive (R) and active (R*)
states (Samama et al., 1993
).
1b-AR
A293E = R143K
R143E (Fig. 4)].
For A293E and R143K, the increase of the J value is
consistent with the fact that these mutants are constitutively active [i.e., the isomerization equilibrium is displaced toward the active (R*) states]. However, the apparent large increase of J for the R143E
mutant is in patent conflict with the lack of activity of this receptor
(Fig. 1). As pointed out under Results, a concurrent reduction of the receptor affinity for the G protein (M) caused by the
mutation could explain the loss of signaling, but it was not consistent
with the large enhancement of agonist binding affinity observed for the
R143E mutant. In the context of the "cubic ternary complex model"
(Weiss et al., 1996a
, which represents the
effect of the G protein on the J constant. Such constant has a double
connotation in the context of the model. First, it represents the
contribution of the G protein in stabilizing the R* form of the
receptor. However, because we assume that R*G and HR*G, but not RG and
HRG, are biologically active species,
also represents the
interconversion into active state of receptor-G protein complexes and
implicitly alludes to the process of receptor-mediated G protein
activation. Thus, from a mechanistic point of view, a reduction of
can either mean diminished affinity of R* for G or impaired ability of
R* to activate G. We may speculate that the R143E isomerizes to a state
that favors high affinity for agonists but is unable to either bind the
G protein or induce its activation. Direct measurements of the G
protein-binding properties of this mutant will be necessary to
elucidate this point.
|
1b-AR and
its mutants support the hypothesis that R143 plays a role in receptor
isomerization to different states. Based on the structural similarities
among different constitutively active
1b-AR
mutants carrying mutations of D142 or A293, we consider the opening of
a cytosolic crevice as well as the exposure of a number of cationic
residues, including R288 and K291 toward the cytosol, as some of the
"hallmarks" that contribute to define the "active" states of
the receptor (Fig. 3) (Fanelli et al., 1999b
1b-AR-mediated IP response (Table 1).
In all the structures carrying mutations of R143, the amino acids
substituted at this position (Lys, His, Asn, Ile, Ala, Asp, and Glu)
are no longer able to perform the constraining interaction with D91 in
helix 2. Consequently, in most of these structures, the i2 and portions
of the i3 seem to delimit a site exposed to the cytosol. However, only
in the R143K, R143H, and R143D mutants, which display various levels of
constitutive activity, does the arrangement and the orientation of the
cytosolic loops form structures that are similar to those described
previously for the "active" forms of the receptor (compare R143K
and A293E in Fig. 3) (Fanelli et al., 1999b
1b-AR. Interestingly, the R143E displayed a small but significant increase in basal phosphorylation, that was not observed for the other activation-deficient mutant, R143A
(Fig. 2). Thus, R143E might represent a substrate for GPCR kinases
and/or other regulatory proteins in the absence of agonist, despite
being impaired in the receptor-mediated response. We speculate, therefore, that the small increase in basal phosphorylation might be
another feature related to the isomerization of the receptor to an
"active-like" state upon mutation of R143 to glutamic acid.
Conclusions.
Our findings demonstrate that different mutations
of R143 in the
1b-AR result in apparently
divergent functional effects. However, the results of thermodynamic
analysis and of MD simulations of the receptor mutants could provide
some hypothesis suggesting that R143 in the
1b-AR plays a role in receptor isomerization toward different states, which are best represented by the mutants R143K and R143E. The mutation of R143 to lysine seems to trigger receptor isomerization to an "active" state characterized by high affinity for agonists, increased basal and agonist-induced activity, enhanced basal and agonist-stimulated phosphorylation, and receptor conformers that predict productive receptor-G protein coupling. On the
contrary, the mutation of R143 to glutamic acid seems to induce the
isomerization of the receptor to an "active-like" state that shares
some properties with the "active" forms (including high affinity
for agonists, enhanced basal phosphorylation, and the opening of a
cytosolic crevice between the i2 and i3 loops) but is severely impaired
in its ability to mediate a response. The other mutants of R143 share
features of both the R143K and R143E receptors.
1b-AR
mutated at R143 are similar to those reported for other GPCRs carrying
mutations of the arginine of the E/DRY motif. Mutations of this
conserved arginine impaired the response mediated by rhodopsin (Franke
et al., 1992
2-AR increased
the affinity of the mutated receptor for agonists without impairing
receptor signaling (Seibold et al., 1998
1b-AR mutants showing that
the conformational state of R143E might interact with the G protein but
is unable to mediate the activation of the G protein.
Our experiments on the
1b-AR cannot directly
assess whether mutations of R143 affect receptor-G protein binding
and/or receptor-mediated G protein activation. However, our findings
support the hypothesis that main role of the arginine of the E/DRY
motif is to mediate the conversion of the receptor into the active
state and dictate the configuration of the flexible cytosolic loops
involved in the receptor-G-protein recognition process.
| |
Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G Protein Interaction of a Two-State Allosteric Receptor.
Let's consider the interaction of a ligand (H) and a transducer
protein (G) with a receptor that can exist in at least two interconverting conformations: the constrained (or inactive) form R and the relaxed (or active) form R*. At
equilibrium, the system is described by the following set of reversible
transitions and association reactions, each of which marks a numbered
path in the reaction scheme drawn below (Scheme 1).
|
and
, respectively. The coupling
between the two association processes is given by
,
whereas
defines the linkage among the three concurrent processes
(Weber, 1972
M
M and
J
J, G protein is always prevalently bound
to R*; thus, the model can be simplified on the assumption that only the R* form of the receptor can bind G protein (Samama et al., 1993
(i.e., the G protein effect on
the transition R
R*) becomes a primary factor determining the emergence of biological output from the system, because
it describes the conversion into active form of receptor-G protein
complexes. Thus, by attributing activity only to R*-coupled G protein forms,
acquires an additional connotation and hints to
the process of receptor-mediated G protein activation.
Efficacy and Apparent Intrinsic Activity. Efficacy is a pharmacological concept that describes the intrinsic property of a ligand to trigger biological output upon binding to the receptor. In chemical thermodynamics, efficacy is given by the sign and magnitude of the free energies that drive the system toward the active receptor species at equilibrium. Thus, the free-energy coupling constants are definitions of ligand's efficacy.
In the simplified form of the model, the two ligand-dependent coupling factors
and
are all that is needed to define efficacy (Samama
et al., 1993
in addition to
and 
the "triple" interaction
. The ligand-independent contribution is the constant
, which provides a measure of receptor/G protein "efficacy" (i.e., to which extent and direction G protein binding "pushes" receptor isomerization and vice versa).
In classical receptor theory, intrinsic activity can be equated to
intrinsic efficacy when the relationship between stimulus and response
is linear (Kenakin, 1987Relation between Apparent Intrinsic Activity and Efficacy.
Let's first define fractional effect (Ef)
as the ratio between G protein-bound receptor species and the total
concentration of receptor:
|
|
(1a) |
|
(1b) |
throughout this
appendix
refer to the simplified and complete form of the model,
respectively). The maximal effect induced by a ligand is measured as
the response recorded at saturating concentrations of that ligand.
Thus, we can define maximal effect (Emax)
as the Ef when [H] approaches
infinite. That is:
|
(2a) |
|
(2b) |
Relation between Maximal Effect and Affinity.
We now define
fractional ligand occupancy to the receptor
(Of) as the ratio of ligand-bound receptor
forms over the total concentration of receptor. For both versions of
the model, this can be written with a general hyperbolic relation as
follows:
|
(3) |
|
(4a) |
|
(4b) |
[G]). Under such assumptions, and setting
M[G]
1, the relation between shift in
affinity and maximal effect is given as:
|
(5a) |
|
(5b) |
|
(6) |
). It is evident that the apparent intrinsic activity depends on ratios of both efficacies and affinity shifts. The term
sB/sA can also be written (from eq. 3) as (KA' × KB) / (KB' × KA), where K' stands for "apparent affinity" (i.e., that derived from the experimentally measured apparent Kd of a binding assay) and
K is the equilibrium affinity for the R form (path 1). If
ligand B is a "neutral" antagonist (

= 1, K' = K), then:
|
(7) |
Mutations That Induce Constitutive Activity.
For both
models, mutations that enhance constitutive activity can result from a
shift in the intrinsic stability constant J. As indicated
from equations 2 and 4, the increase of J produces linked
enhancements of both apparent affinity and apparent intrinsic activity
of the system. In Fig. 5A, we show how
"relative" intrinsic activity (i.e., the ligand maximal effect
relative to that of a "full agonist") is related to the
"thermodynamic" efficacy of the system (the product


). As expected, the relation is not linear and
depends on the value of J. At low J, only the
range of positive intrinsic activity is detectable, and ligands with negative efficacy (inverse agonists) are indistinguishable from neutral
antagonists. The situation is inverted as J becomes larger.
|
into opposite directions, then the six-cycle model
predicts opposite effects on affinity and intrinsic activity of
ligands. This situation is simulated in Fig.
6, where identical enhancements of
J are imposed on a "wildtype" receptor either in the
absence (Fig. 6, left) or presence (Fig. 6, right) of a concomitant
decrease of
. In both cases, agonist binding curves (Fig. 6, bottom)
are shifted to the left as J increases, indicating enhanced
affinity. However, the fraction of G-coupled R* (i.e., the
"biological response") goes up with the increase of J in
the first case (Fig. 6, top left), and diminishes in the second (Fig.
6, top right). Additional simulations using different values for the
parameters 

(not shown) indicated that in either cases the
shifts in affinity are related to the "wild-type" intrinsic activity of ligands as illustrated using the simplified equations (2b
and 4b) plotted in Fig. 5B. Therefore, both mutations seem to enhance
binding affinity of ligands in an efficacy-dependent mariner. However,
whereas the first also enhances "basal" activity and apparent
"coupling" of the receptor, the second does the opposite. We may
conclude from this analysis that an increase of J with a
parallel decrease of
explains the difference in properties between
the defective R143E mutant and the constitutively active mutants
compared in this study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 15, 1999; Accepted October 21, 1999
This work was supported by the Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique (Grant 31-51043.97) and by the European Community (Grants BMH4-CT97-2152 and BMH4-CT98-3566).
Send reprint requests to: Susanna Cotecchia, M.D., Institut de Pharmacologie et de Toxicologie. 27, Rue du Bugnon. Faculté de Médecine, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: susanna.cotecchia{at}ipharm.unil.ch
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AR, adrenergic receptor(s);
GPCR, G
protein-coupled receptor;
IP, inositol phosphate;
TM, transmembrane;
E/DRY, Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr;
MD, molecular dynamics;
DMEM, Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium;
HEAT, [
-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-ethylaminomethyl]tetralone;
i3, third
intracellular loop;
i2, second intracellular loop;
GnRH-R, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-adrenergic receptor determine the selectivity of coupling to phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis.
J Biol Chem
267:
1633-1639
1b-adrenergic receptor activation.
Methods
14:
302-317[Medline].
1b-adrenergic receptor activation.
Int J Quantum Chem
73:
71-83.
1B-adrenergic receptor.
J Biol Chem
269:
22887-22893
1b adrenergic receptor mutants display different phosphorylation and internalization features.
Mol Pharmacol
55:
339-347
2-adrenergic receptor is constitutively desensitized and phosphorylated.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
2699-2702
2-adrenergic receptor [published erratum appears in J Biol Chem 1994;269:1566].
J Biol Chem
268:
16483-16487
2-adrenergic receptor. Extending the ternary complex model.
J Biol Chem
268:
4625-4636
1-adrenergic receptor: Role of highly conserved polar amino acids in receptor activation.
EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J
15:
3566-3578[Medline].
1B-adrenergic receptor: Potential role of protonation and hydrophobicity of a highly conserved aspartate.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
808-813
2-adrenoceptor coupling Receptors Channels 5:375-385.
1-adrenergic receptor subtypes: Titration of receptor density and responsiveness with inducible and repressible expression vectors.
Mol Pharmacol
50:
1376-1387[Abstract].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Peverelli, A. G. Lania, G. Mantovani, P. Beck-Peccoz, and A. Spada Characterization of Intracellular Signaling Mediated by Human Somatostatin Receptor 5: Role of the DRY Motif and the Third Intracellular Loop Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3169 - 3176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Berg, J. Dunlop, T. Sanchez, M. Silva, and W. P. Clarke A Conservative, Single-Amino Acid Substitution in the Second Cytoplasmic Domain of the Human Serotonin2C Receptor Alters Both Ligand-Dependent and -Independent Receptor Signaling J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1084 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Case, E. Sharp, T. Benned-Jensen, M. M. Rosenkilde, N. Davis-Poynter, and H. E. Farrell Functional Analysis of the Murine Cytomegalovirus Chemokine Receptor Homologue M33: Ablation of Constitutive Signaling Is Associated with an Attenuated Phenotype In Vivo J. Virol., February 15, 2008; 82(4): 1884 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tokunaga, B. Matsuura, M. Dong, L. J. Miller, T. Ueda, S. Furukawa, Y. Hiasa, and M. Onji Mutational analysis of predicted intracellular loop domains of human motilin receptor Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): G460 - G466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Belujon, E. Bezard, A. Taupignon, B. Bioulac, and A. Benazzouz Noradrenergic Modulation of Subthalamic Nucleus Activity: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Intact and 6-Hydroxydopamine-Lesioned Rats J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9595 - 9606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Binet, B. Duthey, J. Lecaillon, C. Vol, J. Quoyer, G. Labesse, J.-P. Pin, and L. Prezeau Common Structural Requirements for Heptahelical Domain Function in Class A and Class C G Protein-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 12154 - 12163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Decaux, F. Vandergheynst, Y. Bouko, J. Parma, G. Vassart, and C. Vilain Nephrogenic Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis in Adults: High Phenotypic Variability in Men and Women from a Large Pedigree J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 606 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Michel, K. Ganter, S. Venzke, J. Bitzegeio, O. T. Fackler, and O. T. Keppler The Nef Protein of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Is a Broad-Spectrum Modulator of Chemokine Receptor Cell Surface Levels That Acts Independently of Classical Motifs for Receptor Endocytosis and G{alpha}i Signaling Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3578 - 3590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Marion, R. H. Oakley, K.-M. Kim, M. G. Caron, and L. S. Barak A beta-Arrestin Binding Determinant Common to the Second Intracellular Loops of Rhodopsin Family G Protein-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2932 - 2938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Hawtin Charged Residues of the Conserved DRY Triplet of the Vasopressin V1a Receptor Provide Molecular Determinants for Cell Surface Delivery and Internalization Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2005; 68(4): 1172 - 1182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Flanagan A GPCR That Is Not "DRY" Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 1 - 3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rosenkilde, T. N. Kledal, and T. W. Schwartz High Constitutive Activity of a Virus-Encoded Seven Transmembrane Receptor in the Absence of the Conserved DRY Motif (Asp-Arg-Tyr) in Transmembrane Helix 3 Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 11 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lagane, S. Ballet, T. Planchenault, K. Balabanian, E. Le Poul, C. Blanpain, Y. Percherancier, I. Staropoli, G. Vassart, M. Oppermann, et al. Mutation of the DRY Motif Reveals Different Structural Requirements for the CC Chemokine Receptor 5-Mediated Signaling and Receptor Endocytosis Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 1966 - 1976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, C. G. Radu, L. V. Yang, L. A. Bentolila, M. Riedinger, and O. N. Witte Lysophosphatidylcholine-induced Surface Redistribution Regulates Signaling of the Murine G Protein-coupled Receptor G2A Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2005; 16(5): 2234 - 2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jorgensen, L. Martini, T. W. Schwartz, and C. E. Elling Characterization of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor {beta}-Arrestin 2 Interaction: A High-Affinity Receptor Phenotype Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 19(3): 812 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhang, M. Goswami, and D. Hereld Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor Mutants Block Dictyostelium Development Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 562 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Capra, A. Veltri, C. Foglia, L. Crimaldi, A. Habib, M. Parenti, and G. E. Rovati Mutational Analysis of the Highly Conserved ERY Motif of the Thromboxane A2 Receptor: Alternative Role in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2004; 66(4): 880 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Brighton, P. G. Szekeres, and G. B. Willars Neuromedin U and Its Receptors: Structure, Function, and Physiological Roles Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2004; 56(2): 231 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhao and X. Wang Arabidopsis Phospholipase D{alpha}1 Interacts with the Heterotrimeric G-protein {alpha}-Subunit through a Motif Analogous to the DRY Motif in G-protein-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1794 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Lagerstrom, J. Klovins, R. Fredriksson, D. Fridmanis, T. Haitina, M. K. Ling, M. M. Berglund, and H. B. Schioth High Affinity Agonistic Metal Ion Binding Sites within the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Illustrate Conformational Change of Transmembrane Region 3 J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51521 - 51526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Stanasila, J.-B. Perez, H. Vogel, and S. Cotecchia Oligomerization of the {alpha}1a- and {alpha}1b-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes: POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS IN RECEPTOR INTERNALIZATION J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2003; 278(41): 40239 - 40251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wei, S. Ahn, S. K. Shenoy, S. S. Karnik, L. Hunyady, L. M. Luttrell, and R. J. Lefkowitz Independent {beta}-arrestin 2 and G protein-mediated pathways for angiotensin II activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10782 - 10787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Molinari, C. Ambrosio, D. Riitano, M. Sbraccia, M. C. Gro, and T. Costa Promiscuous Coupling at Receptor-Galpha Fusion Proteins. THE RECEPTOR OF ONE COVALENT COMPLEX INTERACTS WITH THE alpha -SUBUNIT OF ANOTHER J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 15778 - 15788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Carrillo, P. A. Stevens, and G. Milligan Measurement of Agonist-Dependent and -Independent Signal Initiation of alpha 1b-Adrenoceptor Mutants by Direct Analysis of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange on the G Protein Galpha 11 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2002; 302(3): 1080 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Huttenrauch, A. Nitzki, F.-T. Lin, S. Honing, and M. Oppermann beta -Arrestin Binding to CC Chemokine Receptor 5 Requires Multiple C-terminal Receptor Phosphorylation Sites and Involves a Conserved Asp-Arg-Tyr Sequence Motif J. Biol. Chem., August 16, 2002; 277(34): 30769 - 30777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Greasley, F. Fanelli, O. Rossier, L. Abuin, and S. Cotecchia Mutagenesis and Modelling of the alpha 1b-Adrenergic Receptor Highlight the Role of the Helix 3/Helix 6 Interface in Receptor Activation Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2002; 61(5): 1025 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Parrish, M. Eilers, W. Ying, and J. B. Konopka The Cytoplasmic End of Transmembrane Domain 3 Regulates the Activity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-Protein-Coupled {alpha}-Factor Receptor Genetics, February 1, 2002; 160(2): 429 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Greasley, F. Fanelli, A. Scheer, L. Abuin, M. Nenniger-Tosato, P. G. DeBenedetti, and S. Cotecchia Mutational and Computational Analysis of the alpha 1b-Adrenergic Receptor. INVOLVEMENT OF BASIC AND HYDROPHOBIC RESIDUES IN RECEPTOR ACTIVATION AND G PROTEIN COUPLING J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 46485 - 46494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Gershengorn and R. Osman Minireview: Insights into G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function Using Molecular Models Endocrinology, January 1, 2001; 142(1): 2 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Stevens, N. Bevan, S. Rees, and G. Milligan Resolution of Inverse Agonist-Induced Up-Regulation from Constitutive Activity of Mutants of the alpha 1b-Adrenoceptor Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2000; 58(2): 438 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Ho, N. Ganeshalingam, A. Rosenhouse-Dantsker, R. Osman, and M. C. Gershengorn Charged Residues at the Intracellular Boundary of Transmembrane Helices 2 and 3 Independently Affect Constitutive Activity of Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus G Protein-coupled Receptor J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2001; 276(2): 1376 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||