|
|
|
|
Vol. 57, Issue 5, 1056-1063, May 2000
Laboratory of Metabolism (G.E., P.F.-S., G.-Y.K., K.S.L., F.J.G.) and Gene Response Section (M.S.S., A.J.F.), Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is known to mediate the toxic and
carcinogenic effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins.
High-affinity AHR ligands, such as
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzeno-p-dioxin, have been shown
to modify cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the
mechanisms by which AHR affects cell proliferation and differentiation
are not fully understood. To investigate the role of AHR in cell
proliferation, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from AHR-null
mice were obtained and characterized. Compared with wild-type MEFs,
AHR-null cells exhibited a lower proliferation rate with an
accumulation of 4N DNA content and increased apoptosis. The expression
levels of Cdc2 and Plk, two kinases important for G2/M
phase of cell cycle, were down-regulated in AHR-null MEFs. In contrast,
transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
), a proliferation inhibitor in
several cell lines, was present at high levels in conditioned medium
from AHR-null MEFs. Concomitant with G2/M cell
accumulation, treatment of wild-type MEFs with TGF-
3 also resulted
in down-regulation of both Cdc2 and Plk. Thus, overproduction of
TGF-
in AHR-deficient cells appears to be the primary factor that
causes low proliferation rates and increased apoptosis. Taken together,
these results suggest that AHR influences TGF-
production, leading
to an alteration in cell cycle control.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a basic helix-loop-helix
transcription factor that is activated by ligand binding and dimerization with the AHR nuclear translocator (Hoffman et al., 1991
).
AHR mediates the transcriptional activation of genes encoding xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochromes P450 (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1), NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, and
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 6 (Rowlands and Gustafsson, 1997
). It also
mediates most of the toxicological effects of the halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) such as polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and
polychlorinated biphenyls, all of which are widely disseminated in the
environment (Safe et al., 1989
; Fernandez-Salguero et al., 1996
).
Mechanistic studies indicate that ligand binding is a limiting factor
in AHR activation and function in numerous cell types (Gonzalez and
Fernandez-Salguero, 1998
). One of the most toxic and well studied HAHs
is 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a
high-affinity AHR ligand. TCDD exposure produces a wide variety of
toxic effects, including a wasting syndrome, immunotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, and, in cases of chronic low-level exposure, tumor development and cancer (Huff et al., 1994
).
TCDD also has a profound effect on the homeostasis of immune system,
particularly in thymus, where it inhibits proliferation and induces
changes in the differentiation pattern of thymocytes (Kremer et al.,
1994
). It was reported that thymic atrophy requires a functional AHR
(Fernandez-Salguero et al., 1996
) and that the targets for TCDD
toxicity in the thymus are located in the hematopoietic compartment
(Staples et al., 1998
). TCDD has also been reported to induce
c-fos and c-jun in Hepa-1 cell cultures
(Puga et al., 1992
) and to up-regulate the expression of several
cytokines [interleukin (IL)-1
, IL-2, transforming growth factor
(TGF)-
3, and tumor necrosis factor-
] and to down-regulate others
(IL-4, IL-6, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-2; Lai et al., 1997
).
These data strongly suggest that AHR could play a role in the
regulation of these genes, many of which are involved in cell
proliferation and differentiation.
Further evidence implicating the AHR in cell cycle control was provided
by studies with AHR-defective Hepa 1c1c7 cells that have lower
levels of AHR expression, delayed cell growth, and longer doubling time
than wild-type cells (Ma and Whitlock, 1996
). A direct interaction
between AHR and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein has also been
described (Ge and Elferink, 1998
). Although ligand binding appears to
be a prerequisite step for AHR activation, no endogenous ligand has
been identified as yet. Alternative pathways for AHR activation have
been proposed that involve protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation
in the absence of ligand binding (Chen and Tukey, 1996
).
Cell cycle checkpoints are regulatory pathways that control the order
and timing of cell cycle transition and ensure that critical events
such as DNA replication and chromosome segregation are completed with
high fidelity. Several cell cycle transitions are dependent on the
activity of cyclin-dependent kinases, and inhibition of these kinases
is a mechanism by which some checkpoint pathways cause cell cycle
arrest. The initiation of mitosis in eukaryotic cells is governed by a
phosphorylation cascade, which culminates in the activation of the
Cdc2/cyclin B complex (Basi and Draetta, 1995
). Polo kinase also
appears to play an important role in various steps during M phase
progression such as activation of Cdc2 through Cdc25, exit from
mitosis, and in cytokinesis (Glover et al., 1998
).
The AHR-null mouse constitutes a valuable model to understand the role
of AHR in cell biology (Fernandez-Salguero et al., 1995
; Gonzalez and
Fernandez-Salguero, 1998
). Using AHR-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts
(MEFs), the role of AHR in cell cycle progression was studied. In this
communication, evidence is provided indicating that AHR plays a role in
controlling cell division by influencing the expression level of the
mitotic kinases, Cdc2 and Plk, as well as TGF-
. Such changes may
result in lower proliferation rates, G2/M cell
accumulation, and apoptosis. Furthermore, data are provided showing
that TGF-
3 is able to down-regulate the level of Cdc2 and Plk
expression and induce the accumulation of MEFs at the
G2/M phase. These studies suggest that in the
absent of exogenous ligand stimulation, AHR may participate in the
regulation of the cell cycle through pathways likely involving TGF-
,
Cdc2, and Plk.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mice.
AHR-null and wild-type mice were housed in a
pathogen-free facility (SPF) using air-filtered
controlled-environmental racks and fed with autoclaved Purina rodent
chow with water available ad libitum. All animal manipulations were
done under sterile conditions and in accordance with National
Institutes of Health guidelines recommended and enforced by the
National Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice and MEFs
were genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of
genomic DNA as described previously (Fernandez-Salguero et al., 1995
).
Cell Culture. MEFs were isolated from 14.5-day-old embryos generated by heterozygote crossbreeding. Briefly, the head and internal viscera were removed, and the remaining embryonic tissues were finely minced and digested by incubation in 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). After incubation for 45 min at 37°C with gentle agitation, trypsin was inactivated by adding 3 volumes of complete medium [Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin]. Isolated cells were harvested and cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. MEFs from the second to fourth passages were used in all experiments. To obtain mitotic cells, unsynchronized MEF cultures were treated with 0.6 µg/ml nocodazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 24 h, and rounded-up mitotic cells were mechanically released.
DNA Synthesis. DNA synthesis was determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Cells (5 × 104) were seeded into 24-well dishes (final volume, 0.5 ml), and 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) was added to each well 2 h before harvest. Cells were then fixed with methanol/acetic acid (3:1 v/v) and washed with 80% methanol. Then, 0.5 ml of 0.25% trypsin-EDTA was added, and the plates were incubated for 30 min at 37°C before harvesting into a 24-well filter plate. Incorporated radioactivity was counted in a Beckman LS 5000TD scintillation counter.
Flow Cytometry.
MEFs were harvested and washed in PBS. Cells
were resuspended in 0.5 ml of cold PBS and fixed by slowly adding 4.5 ml of cold 100% ethanol while vortexing gently. Samples were incubated
at
20°C overnight. After fixation, cells were pelleted out of
ethanol, washed once with PBS, and resuspended in PBS containing 20 µg of propidium iodide (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 200 µg/ml
DNase-free RNase (5 Prime-3 Prime, Boulder, CO). Cells were incubated
at 37°C for 30 min and then allowed to stain for at least 8 h at 4°C. Samples were analyzed for DNA content on a Becton Dickinson (Mountain View, CA) FACScan as previously described (Lanni and Jacks,
1998
).
Western Blot Analysis.
Affinity-purified Plk antibody (Lee
et al., 1995
) was used at 0.5 µg/ml. Goat polyclonal ERK-1/2 and
rabbit polyclonal Cdc2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa
Cruz, CA) were used at 0.5 µg/ml. Western blot analysis was carried
out as reported previously (Lee et al., 1995
), and proteins that
interact with antibodies were detected by an enhanced chemiluminescence
Western detection system (Amersham).
Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNA from wild-type and
AHR-null MEFs was isolated by homogenizing cells in guanidine-phenol
solution (Biotex Laboratories, Houston, TX). Total RNA (20 µg) was
subjected to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose/2.2 M formaldehyde gel
and transferred to Gene Screen Plus membranes in 20× SSC (3 M NaCl, 30 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0). The RNA was fixed to the membranes by
baking at 80°C for 2 h, prehybridized in SSC/formamide solution,
and hybridized at 42°C with the 32P-labeled
probes. cDNAs were labeled by random priming with DNA polymerase I
Klenow fragment using [
-32P]dCTP (Pharmacia,
Piscataway, NJ). Labeled probes were added to the membranes at 2.0 × 106 cpm/ml. Filters were washed in 0.1× SSC
and 0.5% SDS, and the membranes were exposed to autoradiographic film
overnight at
80°C.
Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assays.
MEFs (~5 × 106 cells) were lysed in TBSN buffer [20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 5 mM EGTA, 1.5 mM EDTA, 20 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 1 mM
4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin]. For measuring Cdc2 kinase
activity, the lysate was incubated with 10 µl of
p13suc1 agarose conjugate (Calbiochem, San Diego,
CA) for 2 h. The precipitates were washed and subjected to kinase
reaction in a kinase cocktail containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 4 mM
MgCl2, 5 µM cold ATP, 10 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP, and 3 µg of histone H1
(Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) as a substrate. All reactions were carried
out at 30°C for 15 min, and the reactions were terminated by the
addition of 5× Laemmli's sample buffer (Laemmli, 1970
) and boiled for
5 min. Proteins were separated on an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel, and
32P incorporation was detected by autoradiography.
TGF-
Assay.
To prepare conditioned medium, MEF cultures
were grown in fresh medium without serum (OPTI-MEM I; Life
Technologies). After incubation for 48 or 72 h, the supernatants
were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The resulting
supernatants were supplemented with BSA (Sigma Chemical Co.) and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma Chemical Co.) at final
concentrations of 100 µg/ml. Conditioned medium was aliquoted and
stored at
80°C until the measurement of TGF-
activity. To
prepare the conditioned media used to study its effects on DNA
distribution, MEF cultures were grow in fresh OPTI-MEM I medium
supplemented with 2% of fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies). After
incubation for 72 h, the conditioned medium was obtained as
described earlier.
activity were performed using the mink lung
epithelial cell line CCL64. Cells were plated onto 24-well plates at a
density of 2.5 × 104 cells/well in 1 ml of
DMEM with 10% FBS and allowed to adhere overnight. The next day, cells
were washed with fresh medium containing 1% FBS. Conditioned medium
prepared from wild-type or AHR-null MEFs were diluted in DMEM with 1%
serum and added to the plates. TGF-
antibody 1D11 (25 µg/ml;
Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) or control IgG was added to the conditioned
medium. To quantify TGF-
secretion, additional wells were treated
with medium plus TGF-
at various concentrations as standard. CCL64
cells were grown for 24 h, and 0.5 µCi of
[3H]thymidine was added for the final 2 h
of incubation. Cells were harvested, transferred to a 24-well filter
plate, and counted with a Beckman LS 5000TD scintillation counter.
Analysis for Apoptosis. MEFs were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h. Cells were washed in PBS, fixed in ice-cold absolute methanol for 5 min, rehydrated in PBS, and incubated with 4'-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution for 30 min in the dark. Cells were then washed and analyzed using an Olympus fluorescence microscope at 420 nm. Apoptotic cells exhibiting crescent-shaped areas of condensed chromatin located near the periphery of the nucleus and/or fragmented nuclei were scored as positive. Apoptotic nuclei were counted in five to seven randomly selected fields using a 40× neofluar objective. At least 500 to 1000 nuclei were counted for each genotype at different time points.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Accumulation of AHR-Null MEFs in G2/M Phase of Cell
Cycle.
To examine whether AHR plays a role in normal cell
proliferation, MEFs derived from wild-type and AHR-null mice were
analyzed for cell doubling time and DNA synthesis rates. The doubling
time of wild-type MEFs was 24 h, whereas that for AHR-null MEFs
was about 65 h, almost 3-fold slower (Fig.
1A). The DNA synthesis rate was also
markedly different; by 24 h, wild-type MEF cultures had
incorporated 3-fold more [3H]thymidine than
AHR-null MEFs (Fig. 1B). By 72 h, AHR-null MEFs incorporated only
35% of [3H]thymidine compared with the control
cultures. These results indicate that AHR plays an important role in
cell proliferation.
|
|
|
Elevated Apoptosis in AHR-Null MEFs.
Apoptosis may contribute
to the longer doubling time observed in AHR-null MEFs. To determine
whether AHR-null MEFs have increased rates of apoptosis, the cells were
stained with DAPI to detect the morphological features of apoptosis. As
shown in Fig. 3, A and B, wild-type MEFs
exhibited low levels of apoptotic cells, less than 5% of the total
cell population, after 24, 48, and 72 h in culture. In contrast,
in AHR-null MEF cells cultured for 48 and 72 h, approximately 30%
of the total cell population showed peripheral accumulation of
chromatin in their nuclei, indicating apoptosis. In support of this
observation, the increased apoptosis appears to correlate with
decreased cell proliferation in AHR-null MEFs. Doubling times then were
normalized to apoptotic cell rates (22.8 h for wild-type and 45.5 h for AHR-null). It should be noted that AHR-null cells exhibit a
3-fold slower DNA synthesis rate than wild-type MEFs, although they
were approximately 2-fold slower in doubling time. This apparent
discrepancy may be due in part to a continued high rate of apoptosis in
the AHR-null cells. Combining the normalized doubling times with flow
cytometric data of wild-type and AHR-null MEFs allows us to estimate
the time that each cell type spends in each phase of cell cycle (Table
2). Although AHR-null MEFs possess
significantly longer G0/G1
and S phases than wild-type cells, they spend approximately three times
as much time as wild-type MEFs in G2/M phase
(20.6 versus 6.9 h, respectively). These data reveal that the
increased doubling time observed in AHR-null MEFs is largely due to the
prolonged G2/M phase.
|
|
Cdc2 and Plk mRNA Levels Are Down-Regulated in AHR-Null MEFs.
Cyclin-dependent kinases play key roles at multiple checkpoints during
progression of the cell cycle (Grana and Reddy, 1995
). The entry of the
cells into mitosis is regulated by the Cdc2/cyclin B kinase complex
that is required for the G2/M phase transition (Murray and Kirschner, 1989
). In addition, Cdc2/cyclin B kinase inhibition results in a G2/M phase arrest (Nurse,
1990
). Plk is a member of polo kinase subfamily that appears to
play important roles at various stages in G2/M
phase of the cell cycle (DM Glover et al., 1998
).
|
|
AHR-Null MEFs Present Higher Levels of Active TGF-
.
The
TGF-
family consists of three polypeptides (TGF-
1, TGF-
2, and
TGF-
3) that regulate morphogenesis, differentiation, proliferation,
and adhesion (Massague, 1990
). In chondrocytes and vascular smooth
muscle cells, TGF-
2 and TGF-
3 decrease cell proliferation rates
by extending the G2/M phase (Grainger et al., 1994
; Boumediene et al., 1995
). It has also been observed that TGF-
inhibits Cdc2 synthesis (Eblen et al., 1994
) and can elicit programmed
cell death in endometrial cells (Rotello et al., 1991
), normal and
transformed hepatocytes (Fukuda et al., 1993
), and a number of other
cell types. Recently, increased TGF-
activity has been reported in
AHR-null primary hepatocytes (Zaher et al., 1998
). Thus, the observed
G2/M phase cell accumulation, together with the
down-regulation of Cdc2 and Plk, could be due to an alteration in
TGF-
activity. To examine whether AHR-null MEFs secreted active TGF-
into the medium, TGF-
bioassays were performed (Fig.
6). No inhibitory effect was observed
when conditioned medium from wild-type MEF cultures was used (data not
shown). In contrast, a 5-fold dilution of conditioned medium from the
AHR-null MEFs inhibited CCL64 cell growth by more than 50% (equivalent
to 50 pmol of TGF-
). This inhibition was partially blocked by the
addition of the anti-TGF-
blocking antibody 1D11 but not by control
IgG. In addition, the activation of latent TGF-
through heating of the conditioned medium at 80°C for 8 min results in cell growth inhibition by around 90% (equivalent to 450 pmol of TGF-
), which was also partially blocked by the 1D11 antibody but not by the control
IgG (Fig. 6). These data suggest that the inhibition of cell growth
observed in AHR-null MEFs is due to an increased level of TGF-
secreted into the medium and that it may contribute to the higher
apoptosis rate observed in AHR-null MEFs.
|
AHR-Null Conditioned Medium Induces Accumulation of Cells in
G2/M.
To determine whether AHR-null conditioned medium
contains factors that could account for the accumulation of cells in
G2/M phase, conditioned medium collected from
AHR-null MEF cultures was tested for its ability to influence the cell
cycle. No effects were found when conditioned medium prepared from
wild-type MEF was used (Fig. 7, A and B).
However, enrichment of G2/M phase cells was
evident when wild-type MEFs were treated with conditioned medium
collected from AHR-null MEFs (Fig. 7C). This effect was also partially
blocked by the addition of 1D11 antibody (Fig. 7D). This result is in
agreement with data showing an accumulation of AHR-null MEFs in
G2/M phase (Fig. 2).
|
TGF-
3 Treatment Decreases Cdc2 and Plk mRNA Levels with a
G2/M Phase Cell Accumulation.
To establish a link
between the high TGF-
levels and the G2/M
phase cell accumulation observed in AHR-null MEFs, wild-type cells were
treated with TGF-
3, which is abundant in livers of AHR-null mice
(Zaher et al., 1998
), and Cdc2 and Plk mRNA expression was analyzed by
Northern blotting. After treatment, a marked reduction was found in the
expression of Cdc2 and Plk mRNAs (Fig.
8C). Treatment with TGF-
3 resulted in
an accumulation of cells in G2/M phase (Fig. 8B)
but to a lesser extent than that produced by conditioned medium
collected from AHR-null MEFs. These results suggest that in addition to
TGF-
, other factors may contribute to the observed enrichment of
G2/M phase cells in AHR-null MEFs.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have suggested that the AHR plays an important
role in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation (Gaido et
al., 1992
; Ma and Whitlock, 1996
; Ge and Elferink, 1998
). As shown
here, the AHR indirectly regulates the expression of proteins, such as
Cdc2 and Plk, that are involved in cell cycle control. MEFs derived
from AHR-null mice present a prolonged doubling time and lower DNA
synthesis compared with wild-type MEFs. In both cases, the difference
between wild-type and AHR-null MEFs was about 3-fold. The lower rate of
DNA synthesis observed in AHR-null MEFs was reversed with
reintroduction of AHR by transfection with an AHR cDNA-containing
expression vector (unpublished data). When DNA distribution in the cell
cycle was analyzed, an accumulation of AHR-null MEFs in
G2/M phase was noted. Others observed similar cell proliferation behavior for Hepa 1c1c7 cells, a transformed hepatoma cell line with low levels (up to 10%) of AHR expression (Ma
and Whitlock, 1996
). However, these authors found that the AHR-defective Hepa 1c1c7 cells are arrested in
G1. This discrepancy could be due to the
following reasons: 1) Hepa 1c1c7 is a transformed hepatoma-derived cell
line that has an altered cell cycle, 2) Hepa 1c1c7 cells still express
variable amounts of AHR and thus do not represent a true AHR-deficient
cell line, and 3) differences in cell types could reflect intracellular
differences in the mechanism by which AHR affects cell cycle control.
Because AHR-null MEFs are enriched in G2/M phase of the cell cycle, the expression level and kinase activities of two mitotic kinases, Cdc2 and Plk, were examined. AHR-null MEFs exhibited lower Cdc2 and Plk protein content due to decreased levels of their respective mRNAs compared with wild-type MEFs. These lower protein contents result in decreased total Cdc2 and Plk activity (data not shown). However, no differences were observed for the specific activities of both kinases, suggesting that the activation steps of these enzymes have not been influenced by the absence of AHR. Although no changes were observed for the specific Cdc2 and Plk activities, AHR-null MEF total activities have to be decreased due to the lower expression level. Moreover, up to 3 times more protein from AHR-null mitotic lysates compared with wild-type mitotic lysates was required to immunoprecipitate equal amounts of Cdc2 and Plk proteins. These data suggest that the regulation of Cdc2 and Plk may occur at the transcriptional level. However, TCDD, which is known to activate gene expression through the AHR, failed to induce Cdc2 and Plk mRNA levels in wild-type MEFs (unpublished data), suggesting that these genes are not regulated by a direct AHR mechanism.
Recently, it was reported that livers from AHR-null mice
expressed higher levels of TGF-
1 and TGF-
3 compared with
wild-type animals (Zaher et al., 1998
). TGF-
has been associated
with diminished cell proliferation and elevated apoptosis (Jurgensmeier
et al., 1994
). MEFs from AHR-null mice secreted higher levels of active and latent TGF-
into conditioned medium as determined by its ability
to inhibit proliferation of mink lung epithelial cells. However,
hepatic TGF-
expression was not regulated by the AHR because
AHR-null mice presented TGF-
1 and TGF-
3 mRNA levels similar to
those found in control mice (Zaher et al., 1998
). Transglutaminase activates TGF-
by cleavage of a latent form (Glick et al., 1989
). The induction of type II transglutaminase activity, resulting from
retinoic acid accumulation, was found in the livers of AHR-null mice
(Andreola et al., 1997
). Therefore, an interaction between retinoic
acid and TGF-
signaling pathways could be involved in maintaining
higher levels of active TGF-
in AHR-null MEFs. Further investigations will be necessary to understand the mechanisms by which
the TGF-
latent form is elevated in AHR-null MEFs.
Similar to the results reported in primary hepatocyte cultures, the
elevated levels of TGF-
found in AHR-null MEFs could be responsible
for the higher number of apototic cells present in these cells. These
results are in agreement with several studies showing that
overexpression of TGF-
can result in increased levels of apoptosis
(Jurgensmeier et al., 1994
). Moreover, because TGF-
can effectively
inhibit cell proliferation (Massague, 1990
; Nielsen-Hamilton, 1990
;
Roberts and Sporn, 1990
), its higher level in AHR-null MEFs may
constitute an important factor in the low proliferation rate observed
in these cells.
The treatment of MEFs with TGF-
3 resulted in down-regulation of Cdc2
and Plk mRNA with a 4N DNA cell accumulation. These data are in
agreement with previous reports showing a decreased cell proliferation
rate by extending the G2/M phase in chondrocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells after treatment with TGF-
3
(Grainger et al., 1994
; Boumediene et al., 1995
). Furthermore,
G2/M phase arrest and decreased Cdc2 activity
have been associated with apoptosis (Wood and Earnshaw, 1990
; Ucker,
1991
; Norbury et al., 1994
), and microinjection of anti-Plk antibody
into cultured mammalian cells leads to a temporary mitotic arrest (Lane
and Nigg, 1996
).
Wild-type MEFs treated with conditional medium from AHR-null MEFs
showed an accumulation of cells in G2/M similar
to that observed in AHR-null MEFs. Nevertheless, this effect was only partially blocked by 1D11 antibody, indicating that in the 4N DNA cell
accumulation process, factors others than elevated TGF-
activity may
contribute to the observed altered cell cycle control in AHR-null MEFs.
In conclusion, AHR-null MEFs presented increased levels of latent and
active TGF-
that appear to be responsible for down-regulation of
Cdc2 and Plk mRNAs. The production of TGF-
appears to be the primary
factor leading to a delay in AHR-null MEFs in
G2/M and lower proliferation rates with increased
apoptosis. These data suggest that AHR plays a role in the cell cycle
control through a mechanism involving TGF-
. The role of the AHR in
maintaining appropriate levels of TGF-
in MEF and primary hepatocyte
cultures awaits further investigation.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. Adam Glick for help with flow cytometry analysis and Dr. Debra J. Wolgemuth for providing the Cdc2 cDNA. We thank Dr. Shioko Kimura and other members of Laboratory of Metabolism for careful review of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received September 15, 1999; Accepted January 5, 2000
1 Present address: Departado Farmacologia y Toxicologia, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, San Pedro Zacatenco, Mexico DF CP 07730.
2 Laboratorio de Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Frank J. Gonzalez, Laboratory of Metabolism, National Cancer Institute, Building 37, Room 3E24, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: fjgonz{at}helix.nih.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AHR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor;
HAH, halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon;
MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
DAPI, 4'-diamino-2-phenylindole;
TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzeno-p-dioxin;
TGF-
, transforming growth factor-
.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/
) exhibit liver retinoid accumulation and reduced retinoic acid metabolism.
Cancer Res
57:
2835-2838
and its action on cellular growth and differentiation.
Curr Top Dev Biol
24:
95-136[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Platzer, S. Richter, D. Kneidinger, D. Waltenberger, M. Woisetschlager, and H. Strobl Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation Inhibits In Vitro Differentiation of Human Monocytes and Langerhans Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 66 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Carvajal-Gonzalez, A. C. Roman, M. I. Cerezo-Guisado, E. M. Rico-Leo, G. Martin-Partido, and P. M. Fernandez-Salguero Loss of dioxin-receptor expression accelerates wound healing in vivo by a mechanism involving TGF{beta} J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2009; 122(11): 1823 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Marlowe, Y. Fan, X. Chang, L. Peng, E. S. Knudsen, Y. Xia, and A. Puga The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Binds to E2F1 and Inhibits E2F1-induced Apoptosis Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2008; 19(8): 3263 - 3271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chang, Y. Fan, S. Karyala, S. Schwemberger, C. R. Tomlinson, M. A. Sartor, and A. Puga Ligand-Independent Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Expression and Cell Cycle Progression by the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(17): 6127 - 6139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nestler, M. Risch, B. Fischer, and P. Pocar Regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity in porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes in physiological and toxicological conditions: the role of follicular fluid Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 887 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wu, L. Zhang, M. S. Hoagland, and H. I. Swanson Lack of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Leads to Impaired Activation of AKT/Protein Kinase B and Enhanced Sensitivity to Apoptosis Induced via the Intrinsic Pathway J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 448 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Crews and J. E. Brenman spineless provides a little backbone for dendritic morphogenesis. Genes & Dev., October 15, 2006; 20(20): 2773 - 2778. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. A. Bussmann and J. L. Baranao Regulation of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Expression in Rat Granulosa Cells Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 360 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Mitchell, C. A. Lockhart, G. Huang, and C. J. Elferink Sustained Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activity Attenuates Liver Regeneration Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. A. Bussmann, L. E. Bussmann, and J. L. Baranao An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonist Amplifies the Mitogenic Actions of Estradiol in Granulosa Cells: Evidence of Involvement of the Cognate Receptors Biol Reprod, February 1, 2006; 74(2): 417 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Kashuba, K. Gradin, M. Isaguliants, L. Szekely, L. Poellinger, G. Klein, and A. Kazlauskas Regulation of Transactivation Function of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor by the Epstein-Barr Virus-encoded EBNA-3 Protein J. Biol. Chem., January 13, 2006; 281(2): 1215 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Patel, D. J. Kim, J. M. Peters, and G. H. Perdew The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Directly Regulates Expression of the Potent Mitogen Epiregulin Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2006; 89(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mulero-Navarro, E. Pozo-Guisado, P. A. Perez-Mancera, A. Alvarez-Barrientos, I. Catalina-Fernandez, E. Hernandez-Nieto, J. Saenz-Santamaria, N. Martinez, J. M. Rojas, I. Sanchez-Garcia, et al. Immortalized Mouse Mammary Fibroblasts Lacking Dioxin Receptor Have Impaired Tumorigenicity in a Subcutaneous Mouse Xenograft Model J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28731 - 28741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. V. Beischlag and G. H. Perdew ER{alpha}-AHR-ARNT Protein-Protein Interactions Mediate Estradiol-dependent Transrepression of Dioxin-inducible Gene Transcription J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21607 - 21611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Huang and C. J. Elferink Multiple Mechanisms Are Involved in Ah Receptor-Mediated Cell Cycle Arrest Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 88 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Ray and H. I. Swanson Dioxin-induced Immortalization of Normal Human Keratinocytes and Silencing of p53 and p16INK4a J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27187 - 27193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Caruso, P. A. Mathieu, A. Joiakim, B. Leeson, D. Kessel, B. F. Sloane, and J. J. Reiners Jr. Differential Susceptibilities of Murine Hepatoma 1c1c7 and Tao Cells to the Lysosomal Photosensitizer NPe6: Influence of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor on Lysosomal Fragility and Protease Contents Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 65(4): 1016 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Santiago-Josefat, S. Mulero-Navarro, S. L. Dallas, and P. M. Fernandez-Salguero Overexpression of latent transforming growth factor-{beta} binding protein 1 (LTBP-1) in dioxin receptor-null mouse embryo fibroblasts J. Cell Sci., February 22, 2004; 117(6): 849 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M Wasserman and J. N Topper Adaptation of the endothelium to fluid flow: in vitro analyses of gene expression and in vivo implications Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2004; 9(1): 35 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Levine-Fridman, L. Chen, and C. J. Elferink Cytochrome P4501A1 Promotes G1 Phase Cell Cycle Progression by Controlling Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activity Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2004; 65(2): 461 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Benedict, K. P. Miller, T.-M. Lin, C. Greenfeld, J. K. Babus, R. E. Peterson, and J. A. Flaws Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Regulates Growth, But Not Atresia, of Mouse Preantral and Antral Follicles Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1511 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Wasserman, F. Mehraban, L. G. Komuves, R.-B. Yang, J. E. Tomlinson, Y. Zhang, F. Spriggs, and J. N. Topper Gene expression profile of human endothelial cells exposed to sustained fluid shear stress Physiol Genomics, December 26, 2002; 12(1): 13 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Seubert, A. J. Darmon, A. O. S. El-Kadi, S. J. A. D'Souza, and J. R. Bend Apoptosis in Murine Hepatoma Hepa 1c1c7 Wild-Type, C12, and C4 Cells Mediated by Bilirubin Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Andersson, J. McGuire, C. Rubio, K. Gradin, M. L. Whitelaw, S. Pettersson, A. Hanberg, and L. Poellinger A constitutively active dioxin/aryl hydrocarbon receptor induces stomach tumors PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 9990 - 9995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bolon and E. Galbreath Use of Genetically Engineered Mice in Drug Discovery and Development: Wielding Occam's Razor to Prune the Product Portfolio International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 2002; 21(1): 55 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wolff, P. A. Harper, J. M. Y. Wong, V. Mostert, Y. Wang, and J. Abel Cell-Specific Regulation of Human Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Expression by Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2001; 59(4): 716 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Santiago-Josefat, E. Pozo-Guisado, S. Mulero-Navarro, and P. M. Fernandez-Salguero Proteasome Inhibition Induces Nuclear Translocation and Transcriptional Activation of the Dioxin Receptor in Mouse Embryo Primary Fibroblasts in the Absence of Xenobiotics Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2001; 21(5): 1700 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tohkin, M. Fukuhara, G. Elizondo, S. Tomita, and F. J. Gonzalez Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Is Required for p300-Mediated Induction of DNA Synthesis by Adenovirus E1A Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2000; 58(4): 845 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||