Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder,
Colorado (P.W., A.C.C., M.J.W.), and Departments of Biology
(J.M.M., S.L.) and Psychiatry (J.M.M.), University of Utah,
Salt Lake City, Utah.
 |
Introduction |
Molecular
cloning approaches have revealed the expression of 10 nicotinic
acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits [
2-
7,
9 (to date
8 has been identified only in avian neurons), and
2-
4] in
mammalian neuronal tissue (Lindstrom et al., 1996
). Each of the
subunits' mRNA has a distinct pattern of expression, suggesting the
possibility that they may mediate different processes. In the central
nervous system, many of these neuronal nAChRs seem to be presynaptic,
where they modulate the release of neurotransmitters such as dopamine,
norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and
-aminobutyric acid with
differential pharmacologies (Wonnacott, 1997
).
Heterologous expression of neuronal nAChR subunits has shown different
subunit combinations (or expression of
7-
9 alone) result in
functional nAChR subtypes with differing pharmacological and
biophysical properties (Lindstrom et al., 1996
). The number of neuronal
nAChR subunits known theoretically allows the possibility of vast
numbers of potential subunit combinations and receptor subtypes.
However, efforts to discover which nAChR subtypes exist in the central
nervous system (and their locations) have been hindered by the lack of
subtype-specific pharmacological probes to identify individual subtypes
within the mixed native nAChR population. Indeed, only two subtypes of
neuronal nAChRs, those which correspond to
125I-
-Bgt and `high-affinity agonist
binding' sites, have been thoroughly characterized so far. In
mammalian neuronal systems, 125I-
-Bgt is
believed to bind largely (if not exclusively) to nAChRs containing the
7 subunit (Schoepfer et al., 1990
; Seguela et al., 1992
), whereas
(
)-[3H]nicotine,
[3H]cytisine,
[3H]acetylcholine, and
[3H]methylcarbamylcholine binding is only
detectable at the
4
2 combination of subunits (Whiting and
Lindstrom, 1987
; Flores et al., 1992
). Neuronal bungarotoxin (Bgt), a
minor component of the venom of the Taiwanese banded krait
Bungarus multicinctus (also named
-Bgt, toxin F, and Bgt
3.1) showed initial promise as a selective antagonist of
3
2
subtype nAChRs (Luetje et al., 1990
). However, problems of availability
(B. multicinctus is a protected species), complex kinetics
of interaction at multiple nAChR subtypes (Papke et al., 1993
), and the
difficulty of ensuring the toxin's purity have severely restricted its
usefulness. More recently, it has become apparent that the agonist
ligand [3H]epibatidine binds with detectable
affinity to other neuronal nAChRs in addition to the
4
2 subtype
(Perry and Kellar, 1995
; Marks et al., 1998
; Parker et al., 1998
),
raising hopes of identifying further native nAChR populations.
-CtxMII was identified in the venom of Conus magus by
sequential fractionation and testing of the isolates for inhibition of
3
2 nAChRs expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Cartier
et al., 1996
). Experiments in native systems have demonstrated potent (nanomolar IC50 values) and selective blockade of
nAChR subpopulations in rodent striatal (Grady et al., 1997
; Kulak et
al., 1997
; Kaiser et al., 1998
) and avian ciliary ganglion (Ullian et
al., 1997
) preparations. These functional studies provided strong
evidence that
-CtxMII was a highly selective antagonist of a novel
native receptor population. The high affinity and novel subtype
selectivity of
-CtxMII make it a potentially useful ligand,
particularly in light of its proven ability to interact with native
neuronal nAChRs and the present paucity of selective pharmacological tools.
In this study, a radiolabeled version of
-CtxMII
([125I]
CtxMII) was used to identify, locate,
and enumerate
-CtxMII binding nAChRs in mouse brain. The
distribution and pharmacology of these receptors differs from those
previously characterized, indicating that they represent a novel
population. Using unlabeled
-CtxMII in combination with existing
nicotinic ligands allowed identification of
-CtxMII binding nAChRs
as part of the set of high-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding nAChRs, but distinct
from the traditionally recognized "high-affinity agonist binding"
4
2 subtype. The pharmacological characteristics and distribution
of
-CtxMII binding nAChRs indicate that they are likely to be
composed of (at least)
3 and
2 subunits.
 |
Experimental Procedures |
Animals.
Male mice (C57BL/6J, 60-90 days old) were used
throughout this study. Mice were bred at the Institute for Behavioral
Genetics and housed five per cage. The vivarium was maintained on a
12-h/12-h light/dark cycle (lights on 7 AM to 7 PM), and mice were
given free access to food and water. The Animal Care and Utilization Committee of the University of Colorado, Boulder, approved all procedures used in this study.
Materials.
[3H]Epibatidine (specific
activity, 33.8 Ci/mmol), (
)-[3H]nicotine
(specific activity, 81.5 Ci/mmol), Na125I
(specific activity, 2200 Ci/mmol), and uridine triphosphate (
-35S; initial specific activity, 800 Ci/mmol)
were obtained from DuPont NEN (Boston, MA).
125I-
-Bgt (initial specific activity, 230 Ci/mmol), Hyperfilm
-max, and Hyperfilm-3H
were purchased from Amersham (Mt. Prospect, IL). NaCl, NaOH, KCl,
MgCl2, MgSO4,
CaCl2, chloramine T, ammonium acetate, lysozyme, Tris · HCl, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, polyethylenimine (PEI; 50% w/v solution), yeast tRNA, triethanolamine, sodium citrate, dithiothreitol, Denhardt's solution, acetic anhydride,
diethylpyrocarbonate, sodium phosphate, gelatin,
poly-L-lysine, chromium aluminum sulfate, BSA (Fraction V),
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, EDTA, EGTA, aprotinin, leupeptin
trifluoroacetate, and pepstatin A were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.
(St. Louis, MO). (
)-nicotine bitartrate and DPX mountant were bought
from BDH Chemicals (Poole, UK). Glass fiber filters Type A/E were
obtained from Gelman Sciences (Ann Arbor, MI) and Type GB from MFS
(Dublin, CA). Budget Solve scintillation fluid was purchased from RPI
(Arlington Heights, IL). ATP, CTP, GTP, and RNase A were purchased from
Boehringer-Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). The enzymes SP6 RNA polymerase
and HindIII, were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI).
Dextran sulfate was purchased from Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden), and
formamide from Fluka Chemical Corp. (Ronkonkoma, NY).
Preparation of
-CtxMII and
Y0-
-CtxMII and Iodination of
Y0-
-CtxMII.
Unmodified
-CtxMII was
synthesized as described previously (Cartier et al., 1996
). To provide
an iodination site,
-CtxMII was synthesized with the addition of a
tyrosine at the N terminus (Y0-
-CtxMII).
Although the two histidine residues present in native MII also provide
potential iodination sites, structure-function studies suggested that
modification of these sites would lead to unacceptable levels of
decreased toxin potency (G. E. Cartier, unpublished
observations). Synthesis of Y0-
-CtxMII was
achieved by methods described previously (Cartier et al., 1996
).
To iodinate the peptide, 25 nmol of Y0-
-CtxMII
was dissolved in 25 µl of H2O. To this was
added 40 µl of 0.3 M NH4Ac, pH 5.3. Approximately 10 mCi of Na125I (volume ~22
µl) was added. The iodination reaction was initiated by the addition
of 40 µl of freshly prepared 0.4 mM chloramine T. The reaction
proceeded at room temperature (~22°C) for 10 min and was then
terminated by the addition of 65 µl of 0.5 M ascorbic acid. The pH of
the reaction mix was further lowered by the addition of 0.8 ml of 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Mono- and di-iodinated peptides were
separated from unmodified peptides by reversed-phase HPLC using an
analytical Vydac C18 column. Buffer A was 0.1% TFA, buffer B was
0.09% TFA, 60% acetonitrile, and the loading loop size was 5 ml. The
gradient was 25%-75% B over 50 min. Flow rate was 1 ml/min and
absorbance was monitored at 220 nM. A solution of sodium thiosulfate
(2.5%) and potassium iodide (0.2%) in 1 N NaOH was added to the waste
collection beaker to trap unreacted 125I.
Fractions containing peptide were collected in polypropylene tubes
containing 10 µl of 20 mg/ml lysozyme to decrease adsorption to the
tubes. After collection, peptide material was lyophilized and
resuspended in 100 µl of 40% MeOH. Under the above chromatographic conditions, the unmodified peptide elutes at approximately 27 min with
monoiodo peptide eluting at approximately 29 min. Final yield
(estimated from counting an aliquot in a gamma counter) was
approximately 2 nmol of monoiodo peptide. Monoiodination of the
N-terminal tyrosine was verified by chemical sequencing and mass spectrometry.
Quantitative Autoradiography of 125I-
-CtxMII and
[3H]Epibatidine Binding.
Quantitative
autoradiography procedures were similar to those described previously
(Pauly et al., 1989
; Marks et al., 1998
). Three C57BL/6J mice were
sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The brains were removed from the
skulls and rapidly frozen by immersion in isopentane (
35°C, 10 s). The frozen brains were wrapped in aluminum foil, packed in ice, and
stored at
70°C until sectioning. Tissue sections (14 µm thick)
prepared using an IEC Minotome Cryostat refrigerated to
16°C were
thaw mounted onto subbed microscope slides (Richard Allen, Richland,
MI). Slides were subbed by incubation with gelatin (1% w/v)/chromium
aluminum sulfate (0.1% w/v) for 2 min at 37°C, drying overnight at
37°C, incubation at 37°C for 30 min in 0.1% (w/v)
poly-L-lysine in 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and drying at 37°C
overnight. Mounted sections were stored desiccated at
70°C until
use. Eight series of sections were collected from each mouse brain.
Before incubation with 125I-
-CtxMII, three
adjacent series of sections from each mouse were incubated in binding
buffer (144 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM
MgSO4, 20 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA (w/v), pH 7.5) + phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM, to inactivate endogenous serine
proteases) at 22°C for 15 min. For all
125I-
-CtxMII binding reactions, the standard
binding buffer was supplemented with BSA [0.1% (w/v)], 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, and 10 µg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin trifluoroacetate,
and pepstatin A to protect the ligand from endogenous proteases. The
sections were then incubated with 0.5 nM
125I-
-CtxMII for 2 h at 22°C. The first
series of sections was used to determine total
125I-
-CtxMII binding (no competing ligands),
the second to measure cytisine-resistant
125I-
-CtxMII binding (in the presence of 20 nM
unlabeled cytisine), whereas the third series of sections from each
mouse was used to determine nonspecific
125I-
-CtxMII binding (in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled epibatidine). 125I-
-CtxMII
binding was further investigated by coincubation of sections with
varying concentrations of unlabeled ligands (cytisine, 1-300 nM;
epibatidine, 10-1000 pM;
-Bgt, 1 µM; (
)-nicotine, 30-3000 nM).
After incubation with 125I-
-CtxMII, the slides
were washed as follows: 30 sec in binding buffer + 0.1% (w/v) BSA
(22°C), 30 sec in binding buffer + 0.1% (w/v) BSA (0°C), 5 sec in
0.1× binding buffer + 0.01% (w/v) BSA (twice at 0°C), and twice at
0°C for 5 sec in 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.5).
Sections for use in [3H]epibatidine binding
were rehydrated in binding buffer at 22°C for 15 min, followed by
incubation with 500 pM [3H]epibatidine for
2 h at 22°C. Four series of adjacent sections were used from
each mouse to measure total [3H]epibatidine
binding (no competing ligand), [3H]epibatidine
binding in the presence of 100 nM unlabeled cytisine, [3H]epibatidine binding in the presence of 100 nM unlabeled cytisine + 50 nM unlabeled
-CtxMII, and nonspecific
[3H]epibatidine binding [in the presence of 1 mM unlabeled (
)-nicotine]. Concentrations of unlabeled cytisine and
-CtxMII were chosen on the basis of results obtained in this study
from [3H]epibatidine inhibition binding studies
in membrane preparations (Fig. 4, right). Slides were washed by
sequential incubation in the following buffers (all steps at 0°C): 5 sec in binding buffer (twice), 5 sec in 0.1× binding buffer (twice),
and 5 sec in 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 (twice).
Sections were initially dried with a stream of air, then by overnight
storage (22°C) under vacuum. Mounted, desiccated sections were
apposed to film (1-3 days, Amersham Hyperfilm
-Max film for
125I-labeled sections; 8 weeks, Amersham
Hyperfilm-3H for 3H-labeled
sections). To allow quantification, each film was also exposed to
tissue paste standards of defined specific activity (Geary et al.,
1985
). For tritium, specific activities were 0.05 to 50 nCi/mg (wet
weight), whereas for 125I, specific activities
were 0.25 to 60 nCi/mg (wet weight). The exact specific activities of
the tissue paste standards were determined by measuring radioactivity
in weighed aliquots.
After the films had been exposed to the sections for an appropriate
length of time, they were developed and signal intensity in selected
brain regions was measured by digital image analysis. Films were
illuminated using a Northern Light light box, and autoradiographic images of the sections and tissue paste standards were captured using a
CCD imager camera. Signal intensity was determined using NIH-Image
1.61. Where possible, six independent measurements from different
tissue sections were made for each brain region, under each incubation
condition, for each mouse. The absorbance measurements for each
brain area were averaged, and the mean absorbance was used to calculate
the degree of labeling by reference to the relevant standard curve.
Membrane Preparation.
Each C57BL/6J mouse was sacrificed by
cervical dislocation. The brain was removed from the skull and placed
on an ice-cold platform. Brains were either dissected into 12 regions
[olfactory bulbs, cerebellum, hindbrain (pons-medulla), hypothalamus,
hippocampus, striatum, cerebral cortex, thalamus, midbrain,
interpeduncular nucleus, superior colliculus, and inferior colliculus]
or the hindbrain, cerebellum, and olfactory bulbs were discarded
without further dissection ("whole brain" preparation). Samples
were homogenized in ice-cold hypotonic buffer (14.4 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM
KCl, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM
MgSO4, 2 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) using a glass-Teflon tissue grinder. The particulate fractions were obtained by
centrifugation at 20,000g (15 min, 4°C; Sorval RC-2B
centrifuge). The pellets were resuspended in fresh homogenization
buffer, incubated at 37°C for 10 min, then harvested by
centrifugation as before. Each pellet was washed twice more by
resuspension/centrifugation, then stored (in pellet form under
homogenization buffer) at
70°C until used. Protein concentrations
in the membrane preparations were measured using the method of Lowry et
al. (1951)
, using BSA as the standard.
(
)-[3H]Nicotine Binding to Membranes.
The
binding of (
)-[3H]nicotine was measured using
the method of Marks et al. (1986)
, modified for use with a 96-well
plate washer. Membrane samples (200 µg of whole brain preparation)
were incubated in 96-well polystyrene plates with 20 nM
(
)-[3H]nicotine in 100 µl of binding buffer
for 30 min at 22°C. Binding reactions were terminated by filtration
of samples onto PEI-soaked (0.5% w/v in binding buffer) glass fiber
filters (types GFA/E and GB) using an Inotech Cell Harvester (Inotech,
East Lansing, MI). Samples were subsequently washed six times with
ice-cold binding buffer. Total and nonspecific [in the presence of 1 mM (
)-nicotine tartrate] binding were determined in triplicate. Where inhibition binding was being measured, various concentrations of
competing ligands were included in triplicate wells.
125I-
-Bgt Binding to Membranes.
Binding of
125I-
-Bgt to membrane preparations was
performed using procedures similar to those used with
(
)-[3H]nicotine, except that incubation times
were extended to 5 h and samples contained 1 nM
125I-
-Bgt instead of 20 nM
(
)-[3H]nicotine. The GFA/E filters were
treated with 0.5% PEI and the GFB filters were treated with 5% (w/v)
nonfat dry milk before filtration.
[3H]Epibatidine Binding to Membranes.
Binding
of [3H]epibatidine was quantified as described
previously (Marks et al., 1998
). Incubations were performed in 1-ml polypropylene tubes in a 96-well format, using 50 to 200 µg of membrane protein per tube (depending on brain region). A 500-µl reaction volume was used to minimize problems of ligand depletion, and
all incubations progressed for 2 h at 22°C. The concentration of
[3H]epibatidine (500 pM) used in inhibition
binding experiments was chosen to maintain binding of ligand to the
tissue at 5% or less of total ligand added. Saturation binding
experiments were performed for membrane preparations from each brain
region, using ligand concentrations in the range 10 to 800 pM. At the
lower concentrations, a significant proportion of ligand bound to the tissue. Free [3H]epibatidine concentrations
were estimated by correcting for the amount of ligand bound to tissue,
and these corrected concentrations were used to calculate
Kd values for
[3H]epibatidine binding in each brain region
and, thus, the Ki values for each compound
versus [3H]epibatidine binding.
125I-
-CtxMII Binding to Membranes.
Large
amounts of nonspecific binding were seen when using
125I-
-Ctx (0.2-32 nM) in filtration binding
assays. Best assay performance was produced using the following
modifications to the (
)-[3H]nicotine binding
procedure. Incubation times were extended to 2 h, and incubation
buffer was supplemented with BSA [0.1% (w/v)], 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA,
and 10 µg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin trifluoroacetate, and
pepstatin A to protect the ligand from endogenous proteases. The glass
fiber filters were treated with 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk before filtration.
In Situ RNA Hybridization.
The method used for in situ
hybridization using riboprobes was identical with that used by Simmons
et al. (1989)
and Marks et al. (1992)
. Probes were prepared by in vitro
transcription, using
-35S-UTP as the sole
source of UTP. The
3 probe was prepared from clone pPCA48E(4) cloned
in pSP65, linearized using HindIII, and synthesized using
SP6 RNA polymerase. The synthesis was designed to yield full-length
antisense transcript. Immediately before hybridization, the probe was
subjected to alkaline hydrolysis using the method of Cox et al. (1984)
to yield products with average sizes of 500 bases.
After hybridization, slides were air dried and stored under vacuum
overnight before exposure to Amersham Hyperfilm
-Max film (10 days).
To allow
3 hybridization to be quantified, the film was also exposed
to a set of dot-blotted 35S standards. Serial
dilutions of the [35S]cRNA were made in 5×
standard saline citrate (SSC; 1× SSC, 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM trisodium
citrate, pH 7.0, with HCl), and 400 µl of each dilution was
applied to a prewetted (5× SSC) nylon membrane (New England Nuclear,
Beverly, MA) by vacuum filtration through a 96-well manifold (Life
Technologies, Bethesda, MD). The samples were washed three times with
5× SSC and allowed to dry at room temperature. One set of the dilution
series was cut from the membrane and counted on a liquid scintillation
counter to determine exact counts per unit area. Standards ranged from
0.1 to 60 pCi/mm2. After exposure to the sections and
standards, the films were developed. Autoradiographic images were
captured and hybridization densities quantified as described above for
autoradiographic analysis of ligand binding.
Calculations.
Results for saturation binding experiments
were calculated using the Hill equation: B = Bmax Ln /
(Ln + Kdn), where B
is the binding at the free ligand concentration L, Bmax is the maximum number of binding
sites, Kd is the equilibrium binding
constant, and n is the Hill coefficient. Values of
Bmax, Kd, and
n were calculated using the nonlinear least-squares fitting algorithm of Sigma Plot version 5.0 (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA). Results for inhibition of
(
)-[3H]nicotine and
125I-
-Bgt binding were calculated using a
one-site fit: B = Bo / [1 + (I / IC50)] where B is ligand bound
at inhibitor concentration I, Bo is the
binding in the absence of inhibitor, and IC50 is the concentration of inhibitor required to reduce binding to 50% of
Bo. Results for inhibition of ligand
binding were calculated using the formulae for either one (as above) or
two binding sites: B = B1
/ [1 + (I / IC50-1)] + B2 / [1 + (I /
IC50-2)], where B is ligand bound at
inhibitor concentration I, and B1 and
B2 are binding sites sensitive to
inhibition with IC50-1 and
IC50-2, respectively. Values for
Ki (inhibition binding constant) were
derived by the method of Cheng and Prusoff (1973)
:
Ki = IC50 / 1 + (L /
Kd).
 |
Results |
125I-
-CtxMII Autoradiography, Mouse Brain
Sections.
Preliminary experiments (using monoiodinated but
nonradioactive Y0-
-CtxMII) showed that it
remained a potent inhibitor at
3
2 nAChRs expressed in X. laevis oocytes (Kd = 1.9 nM, compared with 0.35 nM for the native toxin; data not shown). In light of these
data, attempts were made to identify specific, nicotinic
-CtxMII
binding using the monoradioiodinated version of this ligand
(125I-
-CtxMII) in mouse brain sections.
To minimize nonspecific binding, and reduce the possibility of labeling
lower-affinity receptor populations, a low (0.5 nM) concentration of
125I-
-CtxMII was used in autoradiography
experiments. Under these conditions, a small amount of tissue mediated
nonspecific binding of 125I-
-CtxMII binding
(defined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled epibatidine) was seen.
However, specific 125I-
-CtxMII binding could
be clearly distinguished over the tissue background (Fig.
1). Minor variations in nonspecific
binding were noted, making it necessary to measure nonspecific binding
in each individual region to ensure accurate quantification of specific signal strength. Subsequent experiments showed that using higher 125I-
-CtxMII concentrations produced
unacceptably high levels of nonspecific binding. Monoiodination
produced radiolabeled toxin of high specific activity (2200 Ci/mmol),
allowing short film exposures (24-72 h). Toxin was used through one
half-life without any detectable increase in nonspecific signal or
decrease in specific signal strength.

View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Autoradiographic representation of
125I- -CtxMII binding in mouse brain [total, with
cytisine (20 nM), and nonspecific]. Sections (14 µm) were incubated
with 0.5 nM 125I- -CtxMII alone (left column), in the
presence of 20 nM cytisine (center column), and with 1 µM epibatidine
(nonspecific 125I- -CtxMII; right column) as described
under Experimental Procedures. The sections are adjacent
in each row, and the panels are digital images of autoradiograms. The
abbreviations used to identify brain regions are: AC, anterior
commissure; DLGN, dorsolateral geniculate nucleus; FR, fasciculus
retroflexus; IPN, interpeduncular nucleus; LH, lateral habenula; LSZ,
lambdoid septal zone; MH, medial habenula; MVN, medial vestibular
nucleus; NAC, nucleus accumbens core; NAS, nucleus accumbens shell;
OMN, oculomotor nerve (or root); OPN, olivary pretectal nucleus; Opt,
optic tract; OT, olfactory tubercle; PHN, prepositus hypoglossal
nucleus; SCO, superior colliculus, optic nerve layer; SCS, superior
colliculus, superficial gray; SCZ, superior colliculus, zonal layer;
SN, substantia nigra; SOD, supraoptic decussation; Str, striatum; VLGN,
ventrolateral geniculate nucleus.
|
|
The highest levels of specific 125I-
-CtxMII
binding [>5 fmol/mg (wet weight)] were detected in the dorsolateral
and ventrolateral geniculate nuclei, olivary pretectal nucleus, and the
zonal layer of the superior colliculus. High levels (4-5 fmol/mg) of
125I-
-CtxMII binding were also detected in the
superficial gray of the superior colliculus and in the oculomotor
nerve. Outside these highly labeled regions, binding densities were
lower and sites were mainly found in nigrostriatal and
optic-tract-associated regions, as summarized in Table
1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Regional distribution of specific mouse brain 125I- -CtxMII
binding in the presence and absence of 20 nM cytisine.
Mouse brain sections (14 µm) were incubated in the presence of
125I- -CtxMII (0.5 nM) with or without 20 nM cytisine.
Binding of 125I- -CtxMII was detected by exposing max film
to the sections, followed by digital densitometry of the
autoradiographic images. Amounts of ligand bound were calculated by
reference to 125I-containing tissue paste standards. Because
levels of 125I- -CtxMII nonspecific binding varied noticeably
between brain regions, nonspecific binding was determined in each
region, and was used to calculate specific binding (presented in terms
of femtomoles of 125I- -CtxMII bound per milligram of tissue
weight). Measurements were made six times in each region, in each
mouse, where possible. Values are the mean ± S.E. of binding
measured in three different mice.
|
|
The distribution of specific 125I-
-CtxMII
binding resembled a subset of the cytisine-resistant high affinity
[3H]epibatidine binding population reported by
Marks et al. (1998)
. The abilities of unlabeled epibatidine, cytisine,
-Bgt, and nicotine to compete for
125I-
-CtxMII-binding sites were measured by
quantitative autoradiography. Competition binding was assessed in
striatum and the superficial gray of the superior colliculus, as most
of the other regions containing 125I-
-CtxMII
binding are too small to allow sufficient tissue slices to be
collected. Even high concentrations of
-Bgt (1 µM) had no effect
on 125I-
-CtxMII-binding. In contrast, all
three of the remaining ligands competed effectively for
125I-
-CtxMII-binding in a monophasic manner
(Fig. 2). Assuming a Kd value of 1.9 nM for
125I-
-CtxMII-binding (obtained in competition
binding experiments using nonradioactive, monoiodinated
Y0-
-CtxMII, as mentioned previously),
Ki values in the superficial gray of the
superior colliculus were epibatidine, 81 ± 32 pM; cytisine,
14 ± 6 nM; and (
)-nicotine, 381 ± 43 nM, whereas the
corresponding values in the striatum were epibatidine, 89 ± 30 pM; cytisine, 18 ± 4 nM; and (
)-nicotine, 276 ± 67 nM.
Hill coefficients were not significantly different from 1 for each drug
in each region (Fig. 2).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Competition by cytisine, epibatidine, ( )-nicotine,
and -Bgt for 125I- -CtxMII binding sites in mouse
brain. Sections (14 µm) were incubated with 0.5 nM
125I- -CtxMII in the presence of varying unlabeled ligand
concentrations as described in the Methods section. Left, competition
for specific 125I- -CtxMII binding in the superficial
gray of the superior colliculus by epibatidine ( ,
IC50 = 103 ± 41 pM,
nH = 0.87 ± 0.09), cytisine
( , IC50 = 18 ± 8 nM,
nH = 0.94 ± 0.12), and
( )-nicotine ( , IC50 = 481 ± 54 nM,
nH = 1.47 ± 0.20). Right,
competition for specific 125I- -CtxMII binding in the
striatum by epibatidine ( , IC50 = 112 ± 38 pM, nH = 0.80 ± 0.23), cytisine
( , IC50 = 23 ± 9 nM,
nH = 1.12 ± 0.17), and
( )-nicotine ( , IC50 = 348 ± 84 nM,
nH = 1.05 ± 0.24). -Bgt (1 µM) did not displace 125I- -CtxMII binding in either
region. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled epibatidine. Each point and value is the mean ± S.E.M. of four or five separate determinations. Data were fitted to a
one-site Hill inhibition equation (see Experimental
Procedures).
|
|
To determine whether 125I-
-CtxMII binding
sites nAChRs are uniformly cytisine resistant, the cytisine sensitivity
of 125I-
-CtxMII binding was assessed by
addition of 20 nM cytisine to the binding buffer (a concentration that
the previous workers' data indicated would abolish binding to
cytisine-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding
nAChRs). Binding of 125I-
-CtxMII (0.5 nM) was
noticeably diminished by coincubation with cytisine (20 nM) but was not
reduced to background levels (Fig. 1; Table 1). Comparison of
125I-
-CtxMII binding densities in the presence
and absence of cytisine showed that across brain regions, addition of
20 nM cytisine reduced 125I-
-CtxMII binding by
an average of 40% (Table 1, right column; Fig.
3). In all regions where it was
detectable, specific 125I-
-CtxMII binding
displayed the same cytisine sensitivity (correlation analysis showed
r = 0.96; Fig. 3).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Regional comparison of mouse brain-specific
125I- -CtxMII binding in the presence and absence of
cytisine (20 nM). Levels of specific 125I- -CtxMII (0.5 nM) binding with and without the addition of 20 nM cytisine were
determined by quantitative autoradiography and compared in 23 different
brain regions. Each point is the mean ± S.E.M. of data gathered
from three different animals. Linear regression showed
r = 0.96, slope = 0.600.
|
|
To extend the preceding findings, attempts were made to identify
specific, nicotinic
-CtxMII binding using
125I-
-CtxMII in regionally dissected brain
tissue. However, high nonspecific binding (presumably to the brain
homogenates) was observed even under optimized conditions (see
Experimental Procedures; approximately 2% of the ligand
added was retained as nonspecific binding when using 100 µg of
protein/well of membranes). The autoradiography data suggested that
superior colliculus membranes should contain the highest density of
125I-
-CtxMII binding sites; indeed, evidence
for specific, nicotinic binding of
125I-
-CtxMII (displaceable by 1 µM
epibatidine) was observed in superior colliculus membrane preparations.
Interassay variation in total and nonspecific binding was substantial,
but intra-assay variation was more manageable and each individual
experiment using superior colliculus membranes provided evidence for
specific binding above the nonspecific binding recorded. Fitting to a
Hill binding curve indicated a Bmax of
60 ± 21 fmol/mg of protein, a Kd of 4.9 ± 3.3 nM, and a Hill coefficient of 1.09 ± 0.34 (mean ± S.E.M. of five separate determinations). No evidence for
specific 125I-
-CtxMII binding could be
obtained in the other brain regions tested, presumably because of the
lower densities of binding sites in these regions.
(
)-[3H]Nicotine, 125I-
-Bgt and
[3H]Epibatidine Binding, Mouse Brain Membrane
Preparations.
To expand on the data provided by
125I-
-CtxMII competition binding experiments,
the ability of
-CtxMII to displace
(
)-[3H]nicotine,
125I-
-Bgt, and
[3H]epibatidine binding to mouse brain membrane
preparations was assessed. For comparison, the ability of the nicotinic
agonist cytisine to inhibit binding of the same ligands was also measured.
Inhibition of (
)-[3H]nicotine (20 nM) and
125I-
-Bgt (1 nM) binding (to
4
2 and
7
nAChRs, respectively) was measured in whole-brain membrane
preparations. Cytisine produced a monophasic inhibition of both
(
)-[3H]nicotine and
125I-
-Bgt binding (Fig.
4) but was much more potent in its
interaction with the former (Ki = 0.36 ± 0.04 nM and 1.1 ± 0.5 µM, respectively). In contrast,
-CtxMII was only a weak inhibitor of
(
)-[3H]nicotine and
125I-
-Bgt binding
(Ki > 10 µM in each case).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Competition by cytisine and -CtxMII for
( )-[3H]nicotine, 125I- -Bgt and
[3H]epibatidine binding sites in mouse brain membranes.
Left, mouse whole brain particulate fractions were incubated at 22°C
with ( )-[3H]nicotine (20 nM, 30 min; squares) or
125I- -Bgt (1 nM, 5 h; triangles) in the presence of
unlabeled cytisine (1 nM - 10 µM; filled symbols) or -CtxMII (1 nM - 10 µM; open symbols). Right, mouse superior colliculus particulate
fractions were incubated at 22°C with [3H]epibatidine
(500 pM, 2 h; circles) in the presence of unlabeled cytisine (1 nM - 30 µM; filled symbols) or -CtxMII (30 pM-3 µM; open symbols).
Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 mM unlabeled
( )-nicotine. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. of three
separate determinations. Data were fitted to either one- or two-site
(for cytisine inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding) Hill
inhibition equations (see Experimental Procedures). Both
cytisine-sensitive and cytisine-resistant components of
[3H]epibatidine binding are illustrated on the right
(dotted lines).
|
|
Filtration binding was used to measure cytisine and
-CtxMII
inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding in
membrane preparations from 12 brain regions. Levels of
[3H]epibatidine binding varied widely among
brain regions (Table 2). Levels were
particularly high in the interpeduncular nucleus, with large amounts of
[3H]epibatidine binding also detected in
superior colliculus and thalamic membranes. The lowest amounts of
binding were found in the cerebellum and olfactory bulbs. As reported
previously (Marks et al., 1998
), saturation binding analysis provided
[3H]epibatidine binding
Kd values of 20 to 40 pM in each region investigated, with no evidence for multiphasic ligand binding (data not
shown). Also matching the results of Marks et al. (1998)
, cytisine
inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding exhibits
two phases (with KI = 0.27 ± 0.05 nM
and 32 ± 6 nM: "cytisine-sensitive" and "cytisine
resistant," respectively), indicating that
[3H]epibatidine binds to receptor populations
with differential cytisine affinity (but similar affinities for
[3H]epibatidine, according to the saturation
binding profiles).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
[3H]Epibatidine binding: cytisine-resistant and
-CtxMII-sensitive populations in 12 brain regions
Particulate fractions were prepared from the indicated brain regions of
C57BL/6 mice. The Kd and Bmax
values for each region were calculated from saturation binding
experiments, as described under Experimental Procedures.
Inhibition of [3H]epibatidine (500 pM) binding by cytisine
and -CtxMII was determined as illustrated in Figure 4. Cytisine
inhibition was fitted to a two-site model, with IC50 and
Bmax values for the less-sensitive binding site
being used to calculate the inhibition binding constant
(Ki) and size of the cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding site population in each region. A
one-site model was used to determine the Ki values
and numbers of -CtxMII sensitive binding sites in each region. The
Ki value of -CtxMII inhibition of
[3H]epibatidine binding did not vary significantly between
regions (one-way ANOVA; F(6,13) = 2.64, P > .05). All values are the mean ± S.E. of
values derived from three to four independent experiments.
|
|
In the majority of regions surveyed, the more cytisine-sensitive phase
of [3H]epibatidine binding [believed to
correspond to the high-affinity (
)-[3H]nicotine binding site (Marks et al.,
1998
)] predominated. However, in olfactory bulb and interpeduncular
nucleus preparations, the density of binding sites less sensitive to
cytisine inhibition equaled or exceeded that of the cytisine-sensitive
fraction (50% and 62% of
[3H]epibatidine binding in the two regions,
respectively). Hippocampal membranes contained only cytisine-sensitive
[3H]epibatidine binding. Binding of
[3H]epibatidine was not detectably inhibited by
-CtxMII in interpeduncular nucleus, hindbrain, olfactory bulb,
hippocampal, or cerebellar membranes. However, it is important to note
that these region's small size (interpeduncular nucleus) or low
overall receptor densities (hippocampus, hindbrain, olfactory bulb, and
cerebellum) resulted in low numbers of total
[3H]epibatidine counts being retained, so minor
populations of
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding sites may have been
overlooked. In contrast,
-CtxMII potently
[Ki = 2.7 ± 1.3 nM (mean ± S.E.M. of values in the seven regions where
-CtxMII competition was
observed); Table 2] inhibited a fraction of
[3H]epibatidine binding in the remaining brain
regions studied. At the concentrations studied (30 pM-300 nM),
-CtxMII inhibition of [3H]epibatidine
binding appeared monophasic. The
-CtxMII-sensitive fraction of
[3H]epibatidine binding was approximately equal
to the cytisine-resistant portion in the superior colliculus, striatum,
and olfactory tubercles but was smaller in the remaining brain regions.
Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in
Ki values between regions for
-CtxMII
inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding (one-way
ANOVA; F(6,13) = 2.64, P > .05). Displacement of [3H]epibatidine binding to
superior colliculus membranes by cytisine and
-CtxMII is shown in
Fig. 4, right, whereas the regional distribution of total,
cytisine-resistant, and
-CtxMII-sensitive specific [3H]epibatidine binding is summarized in Table
2.
[3H]Epibatidine Autoradiography, Mouse Brain
Sections.
Competition binding experiments demonstrated that
-CtxMII was able to potently displace a fraction of
[3H]epibatidine binding to mouse brain membrane
preparations. In addition, the same data showed that the density of
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding
sites varied widely among regions. Because the proportion of
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding
never exceeded that of the cytisine-resistant population (and in many
regions was lower), it seemed possible that
-CtxMII was selectively
interacting with a subpopulation of cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding nAChRs, as suggested by
the earlier 125I-
-CtxMII autoradiography
experiments. Crude regional dissection of the mouse brain provided
limited anatomical resolution, so the relationship between
cytisine-resistant and
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding sites was explored
using an autoradiographic approach. Inhibition binding experiments
conducted using filtration binding indicated that 100 nM cytisine would
essentially eliminate [3H]epibatidine binding
to cytisine-sensitive sites (at a
[3H]epibatidine concentration of 500 pM) but
would leave the cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding largely unaffected
(Fig. 4, right). For this reason, cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding was visualized using
500 pM [3H]epibatidine, in combination with 100 nM cytisine. The same series of experiments also suggested that 50 nM
-CtxMII would be sufficient to displace
-CtxMII-sensitive
[3H]epibatidine binding, without affecting
binding to other types of [3H]epibatidine
binding sites.
[3H]Epibatidine proved to be an excellent
autoradiographic probe, producing nonspecific binding that was
indistinguishable from the film background. As would be anticipated
from the competition binding experiments, most
[3H]epibatidine binding to mouse brain sections
was cytisine-sensitive. In some regions (cingulate and frontal cortex,
subiculum, reticular nuclei, dentate gyrus, and pontine nuclei) the
addition of 100 nM cytisine abolished >96% of specific
[3H]epibatidine binding. In contrast, a small
number of brain regions (accessory olfactory bulbs, interpeduncular
nucleus, medial and lateral habenula, and fasciculus retroflexus)
contained a majority of cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding sites. These regions
also contained the highest absolute densities of cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding (Fig.
5; Table
3). In addition to these regions,
cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding was
particularly distinct in the supraoptic decussation, optic tract,
mediolateral and ventrolateral geniculate nuclei, olivary pretectal
nucleus, and the superior and inferior colliculi. Where direct
comparisons were possible, proportions of cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding measured by
quantitative autoradiography and filtration binding were in good
agreement (interpeduncular nucleus, 60.1% by autoradiography, 62.4%
by filtration binding; striatum, 8.0% by autoradiography, 13.6% by
filtration binding; olfactory tubercles, 19.7% by autoradiography,
21.9% by filtration binding).

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Autoradiographic comparison of total
[3H]epibatidine (500 pM) binding with that in the
presence of cytisine (100 nM) or cytisine (100 nM) + -CtxMII (50 nM)
and 3 mRNA expression in mouse brain. Sections (14 µm) were
incubated in the presence of 500 pM [3H]epibatidine (left
column), 500 pM [3H]epibatidine + 100 nM cytisine
(center-left column), 500 pM [3H]epibatidine + 100 nM
cytisine + 50 nM -CtxMII (center-right column), or were subjected to
3 mRNA in situ hybridization ( 3 mRNA; right column) as described
under Experimental Procedures. Nonspecific labeling was
indistinguishable from film background. Panels are digital images of
autoradiograms. The sections in each row are adjacent. Abbreviations
for the indicated brain regions are: 4, somatosensory cortex layer
four; AC, anterior commissure; AOBG, accessory olfactory bulb
glomerular layer AOBM, accessory olfactory bulb mitral layer; CC,
corpus callosum; CgCx, cingulate cortex; DG, dentate gyrus; DLGN,
dorsolateral geniculate nucleus; FR, fasciculus retroflexus; FC,
frontal cortex; ICDC, inferior colliculus, dorsal cortex; IPN,
interpeduncular nucleus; LH, lateral habenula; MGN, medial geniculate
nucleus; MH, medial habenula; MVN, medial vestibular nucleus; NAC,
nucleus accumbens core; NAS, nucleus accumbens shell; OBG, olfactory
bulb glomerular layer; OBP, olfactory bulb internal plexiform layer;
OMN, oculomotor nerve (or root); OPN, olivary pretectal nucleus; Opt,
optic tract; OT, olfactory tubercle; PHN, prepositus hypoglossal
nucleus; RN, reticular nuclei; SCO, superior colliculus, optic nerve
layer; SCS, superior colliculus, superficial gray; SCZ, superior
colliculus, zonal layer; SN, substantia nigra; SOD, supraoptic
decussation; SpCN suprachiasmatic nucleus; Str, striatum; Sub,
subiculum; VLGN, ventrolateral geniculate nucleus; VTA, ventral
tegmental area.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
Regional distribution of specific [3H]epibatidine binding
[total, + cytisine (100 nM), and + cytisine (100 nM) + -CtxMII (50 nM)]
Sections (14 µm) were incubated in the presence of 500 pM
[3H]epibatidine (total [3H]epibatidine), 500 pM
[3H]epibatidine + 100 nM cytisine or 500 pM
[3H]epibatidine + 100 nM cytisine + 50 nM
-CtxMII. Binding of [3H]epibatidine was detected by
exposing max 3H-sensitive film to the sections, followed by
digital densitometry of the resultant autoradiograms. Specific binding
was calculated by reference to 3H-containing tissue paste
standards, and is presented in terms of femtomoles of
[3H]epibatidine bound per milligram of tissue weight. The
amount of -CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding in
each region was calculated as the difference between the
[3H]epibatidine binding in the presence of cytisine (100 nM)
alone and that with both cytisine (100 nM) and -CtxMII (50 nM)
present. Six individual measurements were made from each region, under
each condition in each mouse where possible. Each value represents the
mean ± S.E. of binding measured in three different mice.
|
|
Addition of
-CtxMII (50 nM) resulted in a loss of
[3H]epibatidine binding from the
cytisine-resistant population (defined in the presence of 100 nM
cytisine). This loss was particularly noticeable in the superficial
layers of the superior colliculus, the optic tract, supraoptic
decussation, mediolateral and ventrolateral geniculate nuclei, the
olivary pretectal nucleus, striatum, olfactory tubercles, and
oculomotor nerve, where
75% of cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding was
-CtxMII-sensitive. In contrast, in regions such as the inferior
colliculus, interpeduncular nucleus, olfactory bulbs, medial habenula,
and fasciculus retroflexus, much less
-CtxMII sensitivity was seen
(Fig. 5; Table 3). Again, the distribution of
-CtxMII-sensitive
[3H]epibatidine binding established by
quantitative autoradiography paralleled that measured by inhibition
binding and 125I-
-CtxMII autoradiography experiments.
Levels of specific 125I-
-CtxMII binding were
compared with those of
-CtxMII-sensitive
[3H]epibatidine binding (Fig.
6). In the majority of regions in which
specific 125I-
-CtxMII binding was seen, the
two measures were highly correlated (r = 0.98;
slope = 2.6). However, in six regions (medial habenula, lateral
habenula, oculomotor nerve, zonal layer of the superior colliculus,
fasciculus retroflexus, and interpeduncular nucleus), levels of
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding
fell above the correlation line. In each of these regions,
autoradiography showed that in addition to detectable levels of
specific 125I-
-CtxMII binding, substantial
amounts of [3H]epibatidine binding less
sensitive to both cytisine and unlabeled
-CtxMII were found.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Comparison of specific 125I- -CtxMII
binding and [3H]epibatidine binding sensitive to
-CtxMII (50 nM) in mouse brain. Amounts of specific
125I- -CtxMII (0.5 nM) binding were determined in 23 different brain regions by quantitative autoradiography. The amount of
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding was
quantified in the same regions as the difference between
[3H]epibatidine binding in the presence of cytisine (100 nM) and cytisine (100 nM) + -CtxMII (50 nM). Each point is the
mean ± S.E.M. of data gathered from three different animals. In
regions with small or zero cytisine- + -Ctx-MII-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding populations (filled symbols),
linear regression showed r = 0.96, slope = 2.6. Those regions containing large amounts of -CtxMII-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding (open symbols) deviated markedly
above the regression line. Abbreviations for the indicated brain
regions are: FR, fasciculus retroflexus; IPN, interpeduncular nucleus;
LH, lateral habenula; MH, medial habenula; OMN, oculomotor nerve (or
root); SCZ, superior colliculus zonal layer.
|
|
3 Subunit Expression: In Situ Hybridization.
A previous
investigation (Marks et al., 1998
) suggested that cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding is found in regions
that express
3 nAChR subunit mRNA or in regions innervated by those
that do. To explore this link more thoroughly, the distribution of
3
mRNA was mapped by in situ hybridization, and compared with that of
cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding.
Hybridization was performed in brain slices prepared from the same
animals used for autoradiographic investigations of ligand binding in
this study, allowing direct comparisons to be made.
The pattern of
3 hybridization is shown in Fig. 5 (right column).
Expression of
3 mRNA was restricted to a number of small, well-defined nuclei distributed throughout the brain. By far the highest level of hybridization was detected in the medial habenula (48 pCi/mm2), the next highest amount (10 pCi/mm2)
being found in the mitral layer of the accessory olfactory bulbs. Where
detected, hybridization in other brain regions was much weaker than in
these two regions (3.2-0.6 pCi/mm2). The distribution of
3 hybridization is summarized in Table 4. The highest densities of
cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding were
found in the medial habenula and accessory olfactory bulbs, matching
the data for
3 mRNA expression. In addition, patterns of
3
hybridization and cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding were superimposed in
many brain regions (including the dorsal cortex of the inferior
colliculus, medial habenula, medial geniculate nucleus, superficial
layers of the superior colliculus, and the medial vestibular and
prepositus hypoglossal nuclei). In other cases, cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding was found in nuclei
innervated by regions where
3 hybridization can be detected (nAChRs
are known to be transported from the ventral tegmental area and
substantia nigra to the striatum, frontal cortex, olfactory tubercles,
and nucleus accumbens (Schwartz et al., 1984
), from the retina to the
superior colliculus and the geniculate nuclei (Swanson et al., 1987
),
and from the medial habenula to the interpeduncular nucleus (Clarke et
al., 1986
). In addition, cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding was detectable on fiber
tracts in the fasciculus retroflexus, oculomotor nerve, optic tract,
brachium of the superior colliculus, and supraoptic decussation. Small
amounts of
3 hybridization were also found in a number of regions
that have no apparent cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding, most notably the motor
trigeminal nucleus and somatosensory cortex.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4
Regional quantification of 3 mRNA
Data show in situ hybridization of 35S-cRNA for 3 in mouse
brain regions. Hybridization was performed as described under
Experimental Procedures. Hybridized probe was detected by
exposing max film to the sections, followed by digital densitometry
of the autoradiographic images. Specific hybridization was quantified
by reference to dot-blotted samples of 35S-cRNA probe of known
activity and is presented in terms of pCi/mm2. Where possible,
measurements were made six times in each region, in each mouse. Values
are the mean ± S.E. of binding measured in three different mice.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
-CtxMII, originally isolated from the venom of the predatory
cone snail, C. magus (Cartier et al., 1996
), has been used
to investigate the diversity of nicotinic receptor binding sites in
mouse brain. The data presented here demonstrate that mouse brain
high-affinity epibatidine binding has three components: 1) a component
that corresponds to the (
)-[3H]nicotine- and
[3H]cytisine-binding sites
["cytisine-sensitive" sites, probably the
4
2 subtype
(Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987
; Flores et al., 1992
)] and two sites with
lower cytisine affinity ("cytisine-resistant" sites); 2) a
cytisine-resistant component that displays high affinity for
-CtxMII
and that has been visualized here using
125I-
-CtxMII; 3) a cytisine-resistant
component that displays lower affinity for
-CtxMII. This subdivision
of mouse brain [3H]epibatidine-binding nAChRs
is illustrated in Fig. 7.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Summary of [3H]epibatidine binding
sites in mouse brain. Using [3H]epibatidine in
combination with cytisine reveals that [3H]epibatidine
binds specifically and with high affinity in mouse brain to both the
well-established ( )-[3H]nicotine and
[3H]cytisine binding site of 4 2 composition
(Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987 ; Flores et al., 1992 ), and a smaller
population of nAChRs that are less cytisine sensitive (Marks et al.,
1998 ). This allows the use of cytisine to selectively remove
[3H]epibatidine binding at the
( )-[3H]nicotine binding site, revealing sites less
sensitive to cytisine binding. The [3H]epibatidine sites
that are less cytisine-sensitive are likely to contain the 3 nAChR
subunit, and may be divided into two groups according to their
-CtxMII sensitivity. 125I- -CtxMII may be used to
identify and quantify the population that is more -CtxMII-sensitive
and was used in this study to map the distribution of mouse brain
high-affinity -CtxMII binding nAChRs. The population that is more
-CtxMII-sensitive is likely to contain (minimally) 3 and 2
nAChR subunits, whereas the subpopulation that is less
-CtxMII-sensitive can tentatively be assigned a minimal 3 and
4 nAChR subunit composition.
|
|
125I-
-CtxMII Binds to a Novel nAChR Population.
Competition binding experiments demonstrated that
-CtxMII has a low
affinity (Ki >10 µM) at mouse brain
(
)-[3H]nicotine and
125I-
-Bgt binding sites (Fig. 4). This shows
that it binds to a novel neuronal nAChR population, distinct from the
well- characterized (
)-[3H]nicotine- and
125I-
-Bgt-binding sites (corresponding to
4
2 and
7-containing subtypes in mammalian neurons; Whiting and
Lindstrom, 1987
; Schoepfer et al., 1990
; Flores et al., 1992
; Seguela
et al., 1992
).
Competition binding experiments using
125I-
-CtxMII in tissue slices yielded
Ki values versus
125I-
-CtxMII for unlabeled epibatidine and
cytisine of 80 to 90 pM and 14 to 18 nM, respectively. These values are
similar to those reported by Marks et al. (1998)
for cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine-binding sites. As shown in Fig.
3, the cytisine sensitivity of
125I-
-CtxMII-binding sites was constant across
brain regions, suggesting that they represent a single population (an
alternate but less likely explanation is that multiple sites with a
mean cytisine Ki of 20 nM exist in all
125I-
-CtxMII-binding regions). Additionally,
125I-
-CtxMII binding sites have no appreciable
affinity for
-Bgt (no displacement by 1 µM
-Bgt) and have a
relatively low affinity for (
)-nicotine
[Ki = 280-380 nM, compared with 8.9 nM at
the mouse brain
4
2 high affinity
[3H]nicotine binding subtype (Marks et al.,
1998
)].
Quantitative autoradiographic analysis showed that specific
125I-
-CtxMII binding occurs in discrete nuclei
distributed throughout the mouse brain. The sites' regional
distribution is unlike previously reported nicotinic binding patterns
and seemed to represent a subset of the cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine binding sites reported by Marks
et al. (1998)
. The unusual distribution and nicotinic pharmacology of
125I-
-CtxMII-binding sites confirms that they
represent a novel native neuronal nAChR subtype.
-CtxMII-Binding nAChRs are a Subset of Cytisine-Resistant
[3H]Epibatidine Binding Sites.
Confirming the data
provided by the 125I-
-CtxMII autoradiography
experiments,
-CtxMII was a potent inhibitor (mean
Ki = 2.7 nM) of a fraction of
[3H]epibatidine binding sites in mouse brain
regional homogenates (Fig. 4; Table 2). Densities of these
-CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine-binding
sites varied among brain regions, in many cases having a lower density
than cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding
sites. Indeed, quantitative autoradiography (Fig. 5) showed that
-CtxMII-sensitive sites are a subset of the cytisine-resistant
[3H]epibatidine-binding sites describe