![]() |
|
|
Vol. 57, Issue 5, 940-947, May 2000
-Mediated Activation of the Human UDP
Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 Promoter1
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human UDP glucuronosyltransferase, UGT2B7, is expressed in the
liver and gastrointestinal tract, where it catalyzes the glucuronidation of steroids and bile acids. In this study, the UGT2B7 gene was isolated and its proximal
promoter was analyzed. The UGT2B7 gene consists of 6 exons and extends over 16 kilobases (kb). It does not contain a
canonical TATA box but has a region (
2 to
40) adjacent to the
transcription start site that binds nuclear proteins. This region
contains a consensus hepatic nuclear factor-1
(HNF1
)-binding site
and an overlapping AT-rich segment. Varying lengths of the
UGT2B7 gene promoter, with and without these sites, were
fused to the firefly luciferase reporter gene and transfected into
HepG2 cells. UGT2B7 promoter activity with the HNF1/AT-rich element was
stimulated by cotransfection with HNF1
. Additional activation was
observed when HNF1
and octamer transcription factor-1 (Oct-1) were
cotransfected simultaneously. However, Oct-1 alone did not stimulate
promoter activity and did not bind to the promoter in the absence of
HNF1
. Deletion of the HNF1/AT-rich region, or mutations in this
region, abolished UGT2B7 gene promoter activity and
prevented HNF1
-mediated increases in promoter activity. The presence
of HNF1
and octamer transcription factor-1 (Oct-1) in the protein
complex that bound to the HNF1/AT-rich region was demonstrated by gel
shift analyses with antibodies specific to HNF1
and Oct-1 protein.
These results strongly suggest that the liver-enriched factor HNF1
binds to, and activates, the UGT2B7 gene promoter and
that the ubiquitous transcription factor, Oct-1, enhances this
activation by directly interacting with HNF1
. This interaction
between HNF1
and Oct-1 may fine-tune UGT2B7 expression.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glucuronidation
is a major pathway of drug metabolism in mammals. Many xenobiotics,
including drugs and environmental pollutants, as well as endogenous
substances such as bilirubin and steroid hormones, are glucuronidated
and then excreted via either the urine or the bile (Mackenzie, 1995
).
In general, the resulting glucuronides are end-products of metabolism
that have lost the pharmacological activities of the original compound.
However, some glucuronides such as the potent analgesic,
morphine-6-glucuronide (Shimomura et al., 1971
), are more active than
their parent aglycones. The UDP glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) that
catalyze this reaction have been classified into two families,
designated UGT1 and UGT2 (Mackenzie, 1995
; Mackenzie et al., 1997
). The
UGT2 family has been subdivided into UGT2A forms, which are olfactory
specific, UGT2B forms, and a rabbit UGT2C form. To date, the human
UGT2B subfamily consists of six forms (reviewed in Mackenzie et al., 1997
). Human UGT2B7 is a major form in liver, where it catalyzes the
glucuronidation of bile acids, steroids, and many foreign compounds
possessing a hydroxyl or carboxylic acid moiety such as nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (Ritter et al., 1990
; Jin et al., 1993
, 1997
).
UGT2B7 contributes to the glucuronidation of 3
-hydroxysteroids (Jin
et al., 1997
) and appears to be the main enzyme responsible for
morphine-6-glucuronide formation in humans (Coffman et al., 1997
).
Interindividual differences in UGT2B7 mRNA levels have been observed
(Chen et al., 1993
). Because these differences may be a determinant of
the pharmacological significance of morphine-6-glucuronide as a potent
metabolite of morphine, it is important that they are identified. An
understanding of the transcriptional regulation of the
UGT2B7 gene should help to identify these factors and should
provide a framework to search for regulatory polymorphisms that affect
UGT2B7 expression.
As a first step toward understanding the mechanisms that regulate
UGT2B7 expression, we have isolated and characterized cosmid clones
encoding the UGT2B7 gene. The transcription start site was
mapped and binding sites for nuclear proteins in the proximal promoter
of the UGT2B7 gene were identified by DNase I footprint assay. The importance of one of these binding sites, termed region A
(
2 to
42) in the regulation of the UGT2B7 gene was
assessed by functional and DNA binding assays.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
Restriction enzymes and calf intestinal phosphatase were
obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Poly(dI-dC) was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN), dNTPs and DNase
I from Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ), [35S]dATP
from Amersham, [
-32P]ATP from Bresatec
(Adelaide, Australia), Taq polymerase from Perkin-Elmer
(Norwalk, CT), and ELONGASE
from Life Technologies (Rockville, MD). pGL3-basic, pGL3-control,
pRL-TK, and the Dual-Luciferase detection kit were purchased from
Promega (Madison, WI). The hepatic nuclear factor (HNF)-1
and Oct-1
expression plasmids were kind gifts from Dr. Gerald Crabtree (Stanford
University, Stanford, CA) and Dr. Rick Sturm (University of Queensland,
Brisbane, Australia), respectively. Antibodies specific for HNF1
,
HNF1
, and Oct-1, and specific blocking peptide to each antibody were
obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
Methods
Isolation of the UGT2B7 Gene.
Two genomic
clones, COS-16 and COS-17, containing the human UGT2B7 gene
were isolated from a lymphocyte genomic DNA library constructed in the
Spcos2 cosmid vector (Kimura et al., 1989
) with
32P-labeled UGT2B7 variant cDNA (Jin et al.,
1993
) as a probe. The cosmid clones were analyzed by restriction
mapping. All UGT2B genes characterized to date have the same
exon/intron structure. On the basis of this knowledge, oligonucleotides
to UGT2B7 cDNA sequence were designed to amplify across putative UGT2B7
introns. The sizes of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were determined on agarose gels by comparison with appropriate DNA size
markers, and exon/intron boundaries were identified by sequencing the
PCR products. A 1.7-kb HindIII fragment of COS-17 that
contained the proximal promoter was subcloned into pBluescriptII-SK(+)
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and sequenced.
Determination of the UGT2B7 Transcription Start Site. The transcription start site was determined by RNase protection and primer extension analyses. RNase protection analysis was performed according to the RPA II RNase Protection Assay Kit protocol (Ambion AS, Austin, TX). Human liver polyA(+) RNA was used with and without the addition of RNase A. After denaturing at 80°C, reaction products were separated on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, together with products of known UGT2B7 DNA sequence, which were used as marker. After electrophoresis for 3 h at 60 W, gels were processed for autoradiography.
Footprint Analysis.
Footprint analysis was performed
according to the method of Kroeger and Abraham (1997)
, by using
Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin-coated beads (Dynal Inc., Oslo, Norway)
and biotinylated primers. A 229-base pair (bp) fragment of the UGT2B7
promoter (
171 to +58 bp) was generated by PCR with primer sets for
both the sense (5'-GCACTCATAAAGATAAAAGG-3', biotinylated-5'-CTTGGTGCAATGCAATGCTT-3') and anti-sense
(biotinylated-5'-GCACTCATAAAGATAAAAGG-3', 5'-CTTGGTGCAATGCAA- TGCTT-3') orientations. The transcription factor
binding regions were analyzed by DNase I footprint assay with human
hepatoma (HepG2) cell nuclear extracts, by using 50,000 cpm of
32P-labeled sense or anti-sense probe. Nuclear
extracts were prepared as previously described (Hansen et al., 1997
)
and aliquots were stored at
80°C before use. Samples were treated
with 1 U of DNase I for 5 min before isolation of the
32P-labeled DNA/magnetic bead conjugate. After
heating in formamide loading buffer, samples were separated on 6%
acrylamide gels. Sequencing ladders were generated with the same sense
and anti-sense primers used in the synthesis of the footprinting probes
and run in the same gel as footprint reactions. This enabled direct
determination of the regions of sequence involved in DNA-protein interactions.
Construction and Expression of UGT2B7 Promoter
Constructs.
Constructs containing 5' deletions of the
800/+58
UGT2B7 promoter fragment were generated by PCR. The following
oligonucleotides with KpnI sites (underlined) were used to
define the 5' ends of the deletion constructs:
275 (5'-
CGGGGTACCAGATCTGTCACTGCTA- CTG-3'),
44
(5'-CGGGGTACCAAGGGTTACATTTTAACTTCTTG-3') and
27 (5'-CGGGGTACCTTCTTGGCTAATTTATCTTTGG-3'). An oligonucleotide
spanning +39 to +57 of UGT2B7 gene
(5'-CGGGGTACCTGGTGCAATGCAATGCTTG-3') was used in PCR to
define the 3' end of each of these UGT2B7 promoter deletion fragments.
The region A mutant constructs were synthesized by PCR. In the case of
the
44 m construct, the forward primer contained a mutated HNF1 site
(5'-CGGGGTACCAAGGGTTACATTTGCCCTTCTTG-3'). For
the
275 m construct, the HNF1 site was similarly altered by using
complementary oligonucleotides (5'-AAGGGTTACATTTGCCCTTCTTG-3' and
5'-CA- AGAAGGGCAAATGTAACCCTT-3'), and the mutations were introduced by sequential PCR steps (Cormack, 1991
). The PCR was performed with
ELONGASE (Life
Technologies, Rockville, MD). The oligonucleotide primers were
synthesized by Bresatec (Adelaide, Australia). All fragments were
digested with KpnI and subcloned into pGL3-basic vector at
compatible sites (Promega, Madison, WC). DNA sequencing was carried out
on all constructs to ensure that no undesired mutations had been
introduced during DNA amplification by
ELONGASE. The pRL-TK vector
containing the Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene promoter was
used as an internal control in all transfection experiments.
Transfections were performed as previously described (Hansen et al.,
1997
). Cells were harvested at 68 h post-transfection, and
promoter activities in cell lysates were determined by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) in 96-well plates with
a Packard TopCount luminescense and scintillation counter.
Gel Shift Assay.
Complementary oligonucleotides
corresponding to the HNF1/AT-rich element in region A of the
UGT2B7 gene (Fig. 2,
48 to
23, 26 bp) were synthesized
by Life Technologies. These were as follows: UGT2B7 HNF1/AT
(5'-TTATAAGGGTTACATTTTAACTTCTT-3', 5'-AAGAAGTTAAAATGTAACCC-TTATAA-3'). The remaining oligonucleotides containing the consensus binding sites
for HNF1, Oct-1 and cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB), were
synthesized by Bresatec (Adelaide, Australia) as follows: HNF1con
(5'-TCAGGTTAATCATTAACGATCT-3', 5'-AGATCGTTAATGATTAACCTGA-3'), Oct-1con
(5'-TGTCGAATGCAAATCACTAGAA-3', 5'-TTCTAGTGATTTGCATTCGACA-3'), Oct-1 m
with a mutated Oct-1 binding site (5'-TGTCGAATGCAAGCCACTAGAA-3', 5'-TTCTAGTGGCTTGCATTCGACA-3'), and CREB
(5'-AGAGATTGCCTGACGTCAGAGAGCTAG-3', 5'-CTAGCTCTCTGACG- TCAGGCAATCTCT-3'). Double-stranded
oligonucleotides were end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and
[
-32P]ATP after annealing of complementary
oligonucleotides. Conditions for gel shift assay were as described
previously by Hansen et al. (1998)
with the use of 6-µg cell nuclear
extracts. For supershifts, either 1 or 2 µl of antibody was added
after addition of 32P-labeled oligonucleotide,
and samples were incubated for 20 min at room temperature. Each
blocking peptide to the antibody was added before addition of
32P-labeled oligonucleotide and was preincubated
with nuclear extracts for 5 min at room temperature.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characterization of the UGT2B7 Gene And Its Proximal
Promoter.
Cosmid clones that hybridized to
32P-labeled UGT2B7 cDNA were isolated from a
human genomic DNA library. Restriction mapping and sequencing was
performed on these clones. One genomic clone, COS-17, which contained
the UGT2B7 coding region, was selected for additional analysis.
Exon/intron boundaries and intron sizes were determined by PCR and
sequencing to show that the UGT2B7 gene consists of 6 exons
and extends over 16 kb as depicted in Fig.
1.
|
|
|
171 to +58
bp) was assessed by DNase I footprint assays with human hepatoma
(HepG2) cell nuclear extracts. Three footprints termed region A (
2 to
40), region B (
68 to
81), and region C (
89 to
114) in the
UGT2B7 proximal promoter were detected (Fig.
4, underlined in Fig. 2). Region A
contains overlapping HNF1 (indicated in Fig. 2) and an AT-rich,
potential Oct-1 binding site as assigned by MatInspector (Quandt et
al., 1995
|
Functional Analysis of UGT2B7 Gene Promoter Activity
In HepG2 Cells.
To determine whether the HNF1/AT-rich element in
region A contributed toward UGT2B7 gene promoter activity,
various lengths of the UGT2B7 gene promoter were prepared by
PCR and subcloned into the promoterless pGL3-basic vector. The promoter
constructs were designated 2B7
275/+57 (HNF1/AT-rich element in
region A, regions B and C present), 2B7
275 m/+57 (point mutations
introduced into the HNF1-like element in region A), 2B7
44/+57
(HNF1/AT-rich element in region A present), 2B7
44 m/+57 (point
mutations introduced into the HNF1-like element in region A) and 2B7
27/+57 (HNF1/AT-rich element absent; Fig.
5A). The ability of these constructs to
drive the firefly luciferase reporter gene was tested by transfection into human liver hepatoma HepG2 cells, which contain HNF1 and Oct-1
transcription factors. The UGT2B7 constructs containing region A were
active in the HepG2 cell line (Fig. 5B). The longer UGT2B7
gene promoter (
275/+57) was about 12-fold more active than the
shorter promoter (
44/+57). When region A was absent, as in the 2B7
27/+57 construct, or mutated, as in the 2B7
44 m/+57 and
275
m/+constructs, UGT2B7 gene promoter activity was comparable
to or less than that of the promoterless control, pGL3-basic.
|
expression vector with the 2B7
44/+57
construct containing the HNF1/AT-rich element, elevated UGT2B7 promoter
activity 3-fold (Fig. 5C). In contrast, no increase in promoter
activity was observed when an expression vector encoding Oct-1 was
cotransfected with the 2B7
44/+57 construct. However more than
10-fold stimulation of the promoter activity was observed when HNF1
and Oct-1 were cotransfected simultaneously with the 2B7
44/+57
construct. Introduction of point mutations into the HNF1 element
prevented any significant HNF1
-mediated increase or additional
Oct-1-mediated activation in reporter expression. As expected,
cotransfection of the 2B7
27/+57 construct which lacked the HNF1 and
Oct-1-like elements with either HNF1
or Oct-1 expression vectors had
no effect on luciferase activity. Cotransfection of HNF1
, a
transcription factor related to HNF1
, also had no effect on UGT2B7
gene promoter activity (results not shown).
HNF1
Binds to Region A of the UGT2B7 Gene Proximal
Promoter.
As shown above, the HNF1/AT-rich element in region A of
the human UGT2B7 gene promoter binds nuclear proteins and is
necessary for HNF1
/Oct-1-mediated enhancement of UGT2B7 promoter
activity. To determine whether this region binds HNF1 specifically, gel shift analysis was carried out using 32P-labeled
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the HNF1/AT-rich sequence
(UGT2B7 HNF1/AT) and HepG2 nuclear extracts. Nuclear proteins that
bound specifically to this oligonucleotide were detected as a doublet
on autoradiographs (Fig. 6, arrow).
Binding of the labeled oligonucleotide to the complex was substantially reduced, with excess unlabeled UGT2B7 HNF1/AT or HNF1-consensus oligonucleotides. In contrast, the binding was not significantly reduced in the presence of Oct-1-consensus oligonucleotide (up to
50-fold molar excess) or oligonucleotide containing point mutations (Hansen et al. 1997
) that interrupted the HNF1-binding site (data not
shown).
|
and HNF1
(Fig.
7). In the presence of antibody specific
for HNF1
, a supershift in the protein complex was observed. This
supershift was abolished in the presence of the HNF1
peptide that
was used as an antigen to generate the HNF1
-specific antibody.
However, supershifts were not affected by the HNF1
peptide.
Furthermore, a supershift was not observed with the HNF1
-specific
antibody. These data indicate that HNF1
but not HNF1
binds to
region A and are in accord with the demonstration that only HNF1
transactivates the UGT2B7 gene proximal promoter.
|
Oct-1 Is Part of the Protein Complex That Binds to Region A in the
UGT2B7 Gene Proximal Promoter.
As demonstrated
by the functional assays described previously, Oct-1 only activates the
UGT2B7 promoter in the presence of HNF1
. To determine whether Oct-1
is part of the protein complex that binds to region A, supershift
analysis with specific antibody to Oct-1 was performed. Specificity of
the Oct-1 antibody was first demonstrated by its capacity to recognize
the protein binding to an oligonucleotide containing a consensus Oct-1
binding site and its inability to recognize protein that binds to an
unrelated site, a consensus cAMP response element binding site (Fig.
8). This antibody caused a supershift in
part of the protein complex that binds to radiolabeled UGT2B7 HNF1/AT
oligonucleotide (Fig. 9, A and B). The
supershift was abolished in the presence of peptide that was used to
generate the Oct-1-specific antibody but was not affected by peptide to
the related factor, Oct-2 (Fig. 9A) or by HNF1
peptide (Fig. 9B). As
shown in Fig. 6, the oligonucleotide containing the Oct-1 consensus
binding site does not compete with binding of nuclear proteins,
including HNF1
and Oct-1, to the UGT2B7 HNF1/AT rich site. This
suggests that Oct-1 does not bind directly to this site. This was
further confirmed by gel shift analyses with LNCaP cells, which do not
contain HNF1
(Fig. 10). Nuclear
extracts from LNCaP cells did not bind to the UGT2B7 HNF1
/Oct-1 site
(Fig. 10, lanes 4-6), even though Oct-1 was present in these cells, as
shown by the capacity of the Oct-1 consensus oligonucleotide to bind a
protein recognized by the Oct-1 specific antibody (Fig. 10, lanes 9 and
10). However, as described above, nuclear proteins containing HNF1
and Oct-1 in HepG2 cells bound to the UGT2B7 HNF1/AT-rich site (Fig.
10, lanes 1-3). These data indicate that Oct-1 stimulates the activity
of the UGT2B7 proximal promoter via interactions with HNF1
or other
proteins in the complex rather than by direct binding to DNA.
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this paper we have characterized the UGT2B7 gene and
shown that its proximal promoter is activated by the liver-enriched factor HNF1
and the ubiquitous factor, Oct-1. The UGT2B7 gene consists of 6 exons and extends over 16 kb. It is thus similar in
arrangement to other UGT2B genes including
UGT2B1, UGT2B2, UGT2B4, and
UGT2B17 (Mackenzie and Rodbourn, 1990
; Haque et al., 1991
;
Beaulieu et al., 1997
; Monaghan et al., 1997
). However, in contrast to
these genes, which have a TATA box approximately 30 bp upstream from
the transcription start site, UGT2B7 does not have a canonical TATA box
or other sequences that are known to specify the site of transcription
initiation, such as the initiator element, a 17-bp element encompassing
the transcription initiation site. We have, however, identified a
region (region A) adjacent to the transcription start site that binds
nuclear proteins and is most likely responsible for establishing the
preinitiation complex. The 5'-end of region A contains an HNF1/AT-rich
site. The position of this site just 27 bp upstream from the
transcription start site is unusual, as genes containing a functional
HNF1 site have the site positioned at least 40 bp or more from the
transcription start site. These genes include the UGT2B1
gene (Mackenzie and Rodbourn, 1990
; Hansen et al., 1997
); the bilirubin
UDP glucuronosyltransferase gene, UGT1A1 (Ueyama et al.,
1997
); the albumin,
-fetoprotein, and transthyretin genes (Courtois
et al., 1988
); the high affinity Na+/glucose cotransporter (Rhoads et al., 1998
);
CYP2C1, CYP2C2 (Kim and Kemper, 1991
), CYP2E1 (Liu and Gonzalez, 1995
),
and CYP3A2 genes (Legraverand et al., 1994
); and the mouse guanylin
precursor gene (Sciaki et al., 1994
). The unusual position of the
HNF/AT-rich site so close to the transcription start site suggests that
it may be important in the recruitment of the general transcription machinery to the promoter. Indeed, if this site is removed or mutated,
UGT2B7 promoter activity is lowered significantly. This is particularly
evident when the longer promoter construct (
275/+57) is used in
transfection experiments. The longer promoter is about 12-fold more
active than the shorter promoter (
44/+57) and contains two other
regions that bind transcription factors (regions B and C). These
factors most probably contribute to the increased constitutive activity
of the UGT2B1 promoter. Nevertheless, the activity of this longer
promoter is all but abolished when the HNF/AT-rich site (region A) is mutated.
We have shown that the liver-enriched transcription factor, HNF1
,
binds to the HNF1/AT-rich site and activates UGT2B7 promoter activity.
Although this HNF1
-mediated activation is enhanced by Oct-1, Oct-1
alone does not activate the promoter or bind directly to the
HNF1/AT-rich site. As supershift analysis demonstrates that Oct-1 is
part of the complex that binds to the HNF1/AT-rich site, it is logical
to assume that Oct-1 enhances promoter activity by directly interacting
with HNF1
rather than binding to the DNA. Oct-1 is known to bind to
the basal transcription factor TFIIB (Nakshatri et al., 1995
) and
hence may act as the conduit for recruiting the preinitiation complex
to the transcription start site. Although many genes are regulated by
HNF1
and Oct-1, there is only one report demonstrating the
interaction of these two factors in gene regulation. The interaction
between HNF1
and Oct-1 occurred when their respective binding sites
were adjacent to each other and was required for activation of the
hepatitis B virus preS1 promoter (Zhou and Yen, 1991
). The binding of
HNF1
and Oct-1 in a complex to a single DNA binding site, as
observed for the UGT2B7 proximal promoter, has not been described before.
HNF1
and Oct-1 are both homeodomain proteins of the Helix-Turn-Helix
superclass of transcription factors. HNF1
binds as a homodimer or as
a heterodimer with HNF1
to regulate gene transcription in the liver,
kidney, and intestine (Frain et al., 1989
; Rey-Campos et al., 1991
;
Cereghini et al., 1998
). This binding may be stabilized via the direct
interaction of a dimer of DCoH (dimerization cofactor of HNF1) with the
HNF dimer to form a tetramer. The dimer of DCoH does not contact the
DNA directly, but promotes the interaction of HNF1 with suboptimal DNA
target sequences such as the
1-antitrypsin gene TATA box region (Rhee et al., 1997
). Oct-1 may have a role similar
to that of DCoH as a coactivator by stabilizing the interaction of
HNF1
with the UGT2B7 promoter and enhancing HNF1
-mediated transcription activation. Oct-1 has a bipartite DNA binding domain called the POU domain, which can bind as a monomer to DNA (Herr and
Cleary, 1995
). In contrast to HNF1
, Oct-1 can interact with several
other factors including Oct-2 and Pit-1 (Herr and Cleary, 1995
), the
glucocorticoid receptor (Chandran et al., 1999
), OBF-1 (Sauter and
Matthias, 1998
), MAT1 (Inamoto et al., 1997
), VP16 (Babb et al., 1997
),
nuclear matrix proteins (Kim et al., 1996
), Sp1 (Strom et al., 1996
),
NF1 (O'Connor and Bernard, 1995
), the Vitamin D-3 Receptor (Liu
and Freedman, 1994
), and AP-1 (Pfeuffer et al., 1994
) to regulate gene
transcription. All these interactions involve the binding of Oct-1 to
its cognate octamer binding site on DNA and do not depend on the
recruitment of Oct-1 to other sites via an interaction with the factor
bound at those sites, as is proposed in the regulation of the
UGT2B7 gene promoter.
In summary, we have shown that a region adjacent to the UGT2B7
transcription start site is necessary for promoter activity and that
HNF1
binds to this region to activate the UGT2B7 proximal promoter.
Furthermore, we show that Oct-1 acts as a coactivator to enhance the
transcriptional activity of the UGT2B7 gene proximal promoter by
HNF1
. This interaction between HNF1
and Oct-1 may fine-tune the
expression of UGT2B7. Subsequent experiments will be directed toward
identifying factors that bind to regions upstream of region A, (e.g.,
regions B and C) in the UGT2B7 promoter to obtain a more complete model
of how this gene is regulated. However, it is apparent that these
upstream activating factors that bind to regions B and C still require
a functional interaction between HNF1
and region A for full
activity. An understanding of the transcriptional regulation of the
UGT2B7 gene should provide new information and strategies to
elucidate the basis of potential polymorphic variations in the
expression of UGT2B7.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Rikke Lewinsky, Philip Gregory, and Ceilidh Marchant for their excellent technical assistance and Behnaz Mojarrabi for help with DNA sequencing.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 12, 1999; Accepted January 21, 2000
1 This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and grants from the Flinders Medical Centre and Anti-Cancer Foundations of South Australia. Part of this work was presented at the IXth International Workshop on Glucuronidation and the UDP Glucuronosyltransferases (Brisbane, Australia, Oct 21-23, 1998). P.I.M. is a National Health and Medical Council Principal Research Fellow. Y.I. is a recipient of an Overseas Fellowship from the Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology and the Bilateral Scientist Exchange Program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science with the Australian Academy of Science.
2 Present address: Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Send reprint requests to: Peter I. Mackenzie, Ph.D., Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia. E-mail: Mackenzie{at}flinders.edu.au
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
UGT, UDP glucuronosyltransferase; Oct-1, octamer transcription factor-1; HNF, hepatic nuclear factor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s); DCoH, dimerization cofactor of HNF1; CREB, cAMP-response element-binding protein.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activates the rat UDP glucuronosyltransferase UGT2B1 gene promoter.
DNA Cell Biol.
16:
207-214[Medline].
is a regulator of the UDP glucuronosyltransferase UGT2B1 gene.
Mol. Pharmacol.
53:
1027-1033
in expression of the CYP2E1 gene.
DNA Cell Biol.
14:
285-293[Medline].
Implications for a novel response elicited through the proximal octamer site of the lipoprotein lipase promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:
19613-19623
New fast and versatile tools for detection of consensus matches in nucleotide sequence data.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:
4878-4884This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-J. He, W. Zhang, J.-H. Tu, J. Kirchheiner, Y. Chen, D. Guo, Q. Li, Z.-Y. Li, H. Chen, D.-L. Hu, et al. Hepatic Nuclear Factor 1{alpha} Inhibitor Ursodeoxycholic Acid Influences Pharmacokinetics of the Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B1 Substrate Rosuvastatin and Bilirubin Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1453 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Hong, D. Huo, H.-J. Kim, Q. Niu, D. L. Fackenthal, S. A. Cummings, E. M. John, D. W. West, A. S. Whittemore, S. Das, et al. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Total Bilirubin Levels in an Ethnically Diverse Cohort of Women Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2007; 35(8): 1254 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Ross, J. Riley, C. Quigley, and K. I. Welsh Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy of Opioid Switching in Cancer Patients Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 765 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Lewinsky, T. G.K. Jensen, J. Moller, A. Stensballe, J. Olsen, and J. T. Troelsen T-13910 DNA variant associated with lactase persistence interacts with Oct-1 and stimulates lactase promoter activity in vitro Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2005; 14(24): 3945 - 3953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pitarque, C. Rodriguez-Antona, M. Oscarson, and M. Ingelman-Sundberg Transcriptional Regulation of the Human CYP2A6 Gene J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2005; 313(2): 814 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saeki, Y. Saito, H. Jinno, T. Tanaka-Kagawa, A. Ohno, S. Ozawa, K. Ueno, S. Kamakura, N. Kamatani, K. Komamura, et al. SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS AND HAPLOTYPE FREQUENCIES OF UGT2B4 AND UGT2B7 IN A JAPANESE POPULATION Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2004; 32(9): 1048 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Gregory, R. H. Lewinsky, D. A. Gardner-Stephen, and P. I. Mackenzie Coordinate Regulation of the Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A8, 1A9, and 1A10 Genes by Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1{alpha} and the Caudal-Related Homeodomain Protein 2 Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 65(4): 953 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Wells, P. I. Mackenzie, J. Roy Chowdhury, C. Guillemette, P. A. Gregory, Y. Ishii, A. J. Hansen, F. K. Kessler, P. M. Kim, N. Roy Chowdhury, et al. GLUCURONIDATION AND THE UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASES IN HEALTH AND DISEASE Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2004; 32(3): 281 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Divine, S. P. McCaul, and T. C. Simon HNF-1{alpha} and endodermal transcription factors cooperatively activate Fabpl: MODY3 mutations abrogate cooperativity Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 9, 2003; 285(1): G62 - G72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirota, I. Ieiri, H. Takane, H. Sano, K. Kawamoto, H. Aono, A. Yamasaki, H. Takeuchi, M. Masada, E. Shimizu, et al. Sequence Variability and Candidate Gene Analysis in Two Cancer Patients with Complex Clinical Outcomes During Morphine Therapy Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2003; 31(5): 677 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Iyer, M. N. Ho, W. M. Shinn, W. W. Bradford, M. J. Tanga, S. S. Nath, and C. E. Green Glucuronidation of 1'-Hydroxyestragole (1'-HE) by Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases UGT2B7 and UGT1A9 Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2003; 73(1): 36 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Gregory and P. I. Mackenzie The Homeodomain Pbx2-Prep1 Complex Modulates Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1alpha -Mediated Activation of the UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 Gene Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2002; 62(1): 154 - 161. |