![]() |
|
|
Vol. 57, Issue 6, 1190-1198, June 2000
Departments of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (X.W., X.L., F.C.B.), Pulmonary Pharmacology (D.B.S., J.J.F., H.M.S.), and Molecular Biology (R.S.A.), SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We describe here the cloning and characterization of a rat homolog of
the chemokine receptor CXCR3. The predicted amino acid sequence of rat
CXCR3 contains 367 amino acid residues, sharing 96 and 87% amino acid
sequence identity to the murine and human CXCR3, respectively. Among a
large panel of chemokines tested, only interferon-inducible protein-10
(IP-10), interferon-
-induced monokine, and
interferon-inducible T cell
-chemoattractant demonstrated specific abilities to induce an intracellular calcium mobilization response in human embryonic kidney 293 cells transfected with rat CXCR3
expression vector. 125I-IP-10 competition binding studies
to the CXCR3-transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells demonstrated
that human IP-10 and interferon-inducible T cell
-chemoattractant are more potent ligands than human
interferon-
-induced monokine. Following our previous
observation for the induced expression of IP-10 in focal stroke, we
demonstrate here the time-dependent up-regulation of CXCR3 mRNA in the
rat ischemic cortex after permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral
artery. A significant increase in 125I-IP-10-specific
binding to ischemic cerebral cortical samples was obtained and
paralleled the increase in CXCR3 mRNA expression. The changes in
receptor expression and ligand binding correlate highly with known
changes in leukocyte accumulation, and gliosis occurred after
focal stroke. These data suggest that CXCR3/IP-10 may be a potential
novel therapeutic target in focal stroke. In addition, the cloning of
rat CXCR3 provides an important tool for the investigation of the
pathophysiological role of CXCR3 in other rodent disease models.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemokines
are small secreted proinflammatory molecules that chemoattract and
activate specific leukocyte subpopulations in vitro and regulate
leukocyte trafficking in vivo (Rollins, 1997
; Luster, 1998
). They are
thought to initiate and maintain inflammatory responses and may play a
role in the pathology of a number of inflammatory diseases, including
ischemia/reperfusion injury. Chemokines are traditionally classified
into subgroups [e.g., CXC (
) or CC (
)] based on the presence or
absence of an amino acid between the first two cysteine residues. In
general, CXC chemokines that contain a proximal "ELR" motif attract
neutrophils, whereas non-"ELR"-containing CXC chemokines attract
lymphocytes and CC chemokines attract mononuclear cells (Miller and
Krangel, 1992
; Baggiolini et al., 1994
). Recently, additional classes
of chemokines including C and CXXXC chemokines, and their diverse chemoattractive functions, have been described (Rollins, 1997
; Luster,
1998
; Ransohoff and Tani, 1998
).
Chemokine receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled
seven-transmembrane domain receptors (Premack and Schall, 1996
). Based
on ligand preference, chemokine receptors can be divided into separate
classes, including C-, CC-, CXC-, and CX3C- chemokine receptors and
orphan "chemokine-like" receptors. Chemokine receptors interact
with their ligands in a specific, shared, or promiscuous fashion and/or
with viral ligands (Premack and Schall, 1996
). On activation with an
appropriate ligand, the known chemokine receptors produce an increase
in intracellular calcium (Premack and Schall, 1996
), and this activity
has been used to monitor receptor activation.
Interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) and interferon-
-induced
monokine (Mig), CXC chemokines, specifically activate the human CXCR3
(Loetscher et al., 1996
). Both human CXCR3 and the murine ortholog of
CXCR3 have been cloned and characterized (Loetscher et al., 1996
; Soto
et al., 1998
). Recently, another CXC chemokine, interferon-inducible T
cell
-chemoattractant (I-Tac), which activates CXCR3 (Cole et al.,
1998
), has been identified. In addition, a murine CC chemokine,
6Ckine, was reported to bind to the mouse CXCR3 (Soto et al., 1998
),
whereas human 6Ckine failed to interact with the human or mouse CXCR3
(Jenh et al., 1999
). The expression of CXCR3 has been identified on
activated T cells and natural killer cells (Loetscher et al., 1996
; Qin
et al., 1998
) and in a proportion of circulating blood T cells and B
cells (Qin et al., 1998
). Although the primary role of ligands for
CXCR3, whose production is stimulated by interferon-
(IFN-
), is
recruitment of activated T cells (Rollins, 1997
; Luster, 1998
), IP-10
has also exhibited monocyte chemoattraction (Taub et al., 1993
). In addition, IP-10 is involved in a wide range of cellular activities, including vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation (Wang
et al., 1996
) and astrocyte chemoattraction (Wang et al., 1998
).
Cerebral ischemia is associated with an intense inflammatory reaction
that contributes to the secondary progression of ischemic brain injury
(Kochanek and Hallenbeck, 1992
; Feuerstein et al., 1998
). After brain
ischemia, significant polymorphonuclear cell infiltration and
accumulation occur between 1 and 48 h and are followed by
mononuclear cell infiltration between 2 and 15 days after ischemia
(Kochanek and Hallenbeck, 1992
; Clark et al., 1993
; Garcia et al.,
1994
). This inflammatory reaction in the ischemic brain is driven by
the de novo expression of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and
adhesion molecules in the lesion (Feuerstein et al., 1998
). Previously,
we reported the induction of IP-10 mRNA and protein expression after
focal stroke, which appears to play a pleiotropic role in prolonged
leukocyte recruitment, as well as in astrocyte migration/activation
after ischemic brain injury (Wang et al., 1998
). This report further
characterizes the pathophysiological role of IP-10 in ischemic disease
processes, as well as the molecular cloning and characterization of rat
CXCR3. Using a recently developed and very sensitive quantification
method of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Gibson et al.,
1996
; Heid et al., 1996
), elevated expression of CXCR3 was noted in
ischemic cortical samples after permanent occlusion of the middle
cerebral artery (MCAO). Furthermore, a concomitant increase in
125I-IP-10 binding was associated with the
increased CXCR3 expression in the ischemic brain. These changes are
correlated with increased leukocyte accumulation in the ischemic brain
after focal stroke and suggest a role for IP-10/CXCR3 interaction in
the recruitment of inflammatory cells into the brain in response to
ischemic injury.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
The human chemokines IP-10, Mig, MIP-1
,
MIP-1
, MIP-3
, MIP-3
, MCP-2, eotaxin-2, ENA-78, PARC, 6Ckine,
fractakine, HCC-1, MDC, TARC, I-309, and GCP-2 were purchased from R&D
Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Human chemokines MCP-1, MCP-3, MCP-4,
RANTES, MIP-5, GRO
, GRO
, eotaxin-1, PF-4, lymphotactin,
I-TECK, and I-Tac were obtained from PeproTech, Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ).
Human chemokines RANTES, IP-10, IL-8, eotaxin-1, and SDF-1 were
produced by SmithKline Beecham (King of Prussia, PA). Rat chemokines
CINC-2
and CINC-2
and mouse 6Ckine and mouse Mig were purchased
from R&D Systems. Mouse IP-10 was purchased from PeproTech.
Cloning of Rat CXCR3 cDNA.
PCR primers
(5'-CGAATTCATGTACCTTGAGGTTAGTGAACG-3' for the forward and
5'-CGGATCCTTACAAGCCCAGGTAGGAGG-3' for the reverse) were synthesized
based on the published mouse CXCR3 sequence (Soto et al., 1998
) and
included an EcoRI or a BamHI restriction enzyme site, respectively. Reversibly transcribed rat spleen cDNA [primed with oligo(dT)] was used as a template for PCR under standard reverse
transcription (RT)-PCR conditions (Wang et al., 1996
). The PCR fragment
containing the entire coding region was subcloned into a pCR2.1 vector.
The cDNA insert was released from the plasmid with EcoRI and
BamHI double digestions and further subcloned into a pCDN
expression vector (Aiyar et al., 1994
) under control of a CMV promoter.
The resultant plasmid DNA was sequenced on both strands using universal
and specific sequence primers.
Cell Culture and Transfection.
Human embryonic kidney (HEK)
293 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were grown
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with high glucose and
L-glutamine supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal
bovine serum. Cells were transfected with pCDN (empty vector) and
pCDN-rCXCR3 in the presence or absence of a Gqi5 expression vector
(Wilkie et al., 1991
) using LipofectAMINE Plus according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies).
Calcium Mobilization.
A microtiter plate-based
Ca2+ mobilization fluorometric imaging plate
reader assay (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) (Schroeder and Neagle,
1996
) was used for the functional characterization of HEK 293 cells
transiently expressing rat CXCR3. The day after transfection, cells
were plated in poly(D-lysine)-coated 96-well black/clear
plates (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA). After 18 to 24 h, the
medium was aspirated and replaced with 1 µM Fluo-3 acetoxymethyl ester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in Hanks' balanced salt solution with 10 mM HEPES, 200 µM CaCl2, 0.1% BSA, and
2.5 mM probenecid. After a 1-h incubation (37°C, 5%
CO2), cells were washed three times with the same
buffer without dye. The Fluo-3-loaded cells were exposed to varying
concentrations of chemokines. After initiation of the assay,
fluorescence was read every second for 1 min and then every 3 s
for the following minute. Agonist was added at 10 s, and
concentration-response curves were generated by calculating maximal
fluorescent counts above background. The EC50
value is the concentration of agonist producing 50% of the maximal responses.
Radioligand Binding Assays. Receptor binding assays were performed with membranes of HEK 293 cells transiently expressing the human and rat CXCR3. Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator under 5% CO2, 95% air and were harvested by centrifugation at 600g for 10 min. Pellets containing 1 × 108 cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen, passed through three freeze/thaw cycles, and then resuspended in ice-cold 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA containing protease inhibitors (100 µg/l bacitracin, 10 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 100 µM benzamidine, and 10 µg/l soybean trypsin inhibitor) at a concentration of 1 × 108 cells/40 ml. The suspension was homogenized using a Dounce (glass/glass) homogenizer (20-25 strokes) and homogenized with three pulses of 10 s on a 3/4 setting (Polytron tissue homogenizer; Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). This suspension was centrifuged at 300g for 10 min. The pellet was discarded, and the supernatent fraction was centrifuged at 40,000g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in homogenizing buffer using the Polytron and washed once. The membrane pellet was resuspended in assay buffer (50 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4) at a concentration of 1 to 4 mg protein/ml. Membranes (6 × 105 cell equivalents) were incubated with 0.15 nM 125I-IP-10 (New England Nuclear Life Sciences; specific activity, 2200 Ci/mmol) in the absence or presence of unlabeled IP-10 (100 nM for nonspecific binding) for 90 min at room temperature in 96-well polystyrene enzyme immunoassayA/radioimmunoassay plates in a final volume of 100 µl. Binding was terminated by rapid filtration through GF/C filters that were presoaked with 0.5% polyethylenimine (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 1 h, using a 96-well tissue harvester (Unifilter-96 Harvester; Packard). Filters were washed 10 times with wash buffer (25 mM HEPES, 0.5 M NaCl) and air-dried; then, 50 µl of scintillation fluid (Micro Scint 20; Packard) was added to each filter. The amount of radioactivity bound to the filters was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry.
For binding assay using rat brain tissues, rats were subjected to permanent MCAO for 6 or 24 h or 2 or 10 days, or sham surgery for 2 days using the procedure described later. Membranes were prepared by homogenizing rat brain segments in ice-cold hypotonic buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1.0 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 100 µg/ml bacitracin, 100 µM benzamidine, and 10 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl flouride) with a Brinkmann Polytron for 20 s on a setting of 4. Samples were then centrifuged at 40,000g for 30 min at 4°C and washed once using the same buffer. The pellet was resuspended in binding buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM CaCl2, 4 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% BSA. at a concentration of 2 mg/ml. Binding and filtration were performed as described earlier for the receptor membrane assay using concentrations of 0.15 and 0.30 nM 125I-IP-10.Focal Brain Ischemia.
Cerebral focal ischemia or sham
surgery was carried out under stereotaxic control in male spontaneously
hypertensive rats (Taconic Farms Inc., Germantown, NY), at 18 weeks of
age and weighing 250 to 330 g, by permanent MCAO as described
previously (Barone et al., 1992
; Wang et al., 1998
). Briefly, the
middle cerebral artery was permanently occluded and cut dorsal to the
lateral olfactory tract at the level of the inferior cerebral vein
using electrocoagulation (Force 2 Electrosurgical Generator;
Valley Lab Inc., Boulder, CO). In sham-operated rats, the dura was
opened over the middle cerebral artery, but the artery was not
occluded. Rats were overdosed with pentobarbital, and forebrains were
removed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 h and 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 days after
permanent MCAO and at 12 h and 5 days after sham surgery. The
ischemic cortex (i.e., the cortex ipsilateral to surgery) was dissected
from the ipsilateral hemisphere; the contralateral (control) cortex was dissected from the nonischemic contralateral hemisphere of the same rat
(Wang et al., 1998
). The cortical samples were immediately frozen in
liquid nitrogen and stored at
80°C.
Taqman PCR.
Total RNA was prepared by homogenizing the
cortical tissues in an acid guanidinium thiocyanate solution and
extracted with phenol and chloroform as previously described
(Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987
). PCR primers and Taqman probes for CXCR3
(the present report) and rpL32 (X06483; Rajchel et al., 1988
) were
designed using a software program from Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). The forward (1440-1459 bp) and reverse (1511-1531 bp) primers for rat CXCR3 are 5'-CCTGCCTCCGCTGTTTTAGA-3' and
5'-CCTCTTCTCACACAGGGATGG-3', respectively, and the probe (sense,
1462-1484 bp) is 5'-TAGTTGCCTGGAGCCCCACCACC-3'. The sequences for
rpL32 are 5'-TGTCCTCTAAGAACCGAAAAGCC-3' for the forward (314-336 bp),
5'-CGTTGGGATTGGTGACTCTGA-3' for the reverse (365-385 bp) primers, and
5'-TCGTAGAAAGAGCAGCACAGCTGGCC-3' for the probe (sense, 338-363 bp).
The Taqman probe consists of an oligonucleotide with a 5'-reporter dye
(FAM) and a 3'-quencher dye (TAMRA).
Rn (the ratio for the amount of reporter dye
emission to the quenching dye emission) and threshold cycle (Ct) values
were averaged from each reaction. Data were analyzed using a Sequence
Detector V1.6 program (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems). The Ct values
of CXCR3 and rpL32 in the cortical tissues generated by real-time PCR
were compared with the plasmid DNA standard to determine the copy
number of their transcripts.
Statistical Analysis. Statistical comparisons were made by ANOVA (Fisher's protected least-squares difference), and values were considered to be significant at P < .05.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Rat CXCR3 cDNA.
To
isolate the coding sequence of the rat CXCR3 cDNA, a PCR approach was
used with a pair of primers synthesized according to the mouse CXCR3
cDNA sequence (Soto et al., 1998
). A total 1104-bp coding sequence of
rat CXCR3 was cloned and used for functional characterization.
|
|
Functional Analysis of Cloned CXCR3 in HEK 293 Cells.
The rat
and human CXCR3 cDNAs were subcloned into a mammalian expression
vector, and the resultant plasmids were transiently cotransfected into
HEK 293 cells with or without the Gqi5 plasmid. The CXCR3 receptor
transfected alone into HEK 293 cells responded, but this activity was
enhanced by the cotransfection with promiscuous G proteins and G
protein chimeras. Of these cotransfected G proteins, Gqi5 produced the
best response, and thus its cotransfection data are illustrated, which
are in agreement with previous reports (Offermanns and Simon, 1995
;
Coward et al., 1999
). The transfectants were tested for intracellular
calcium mobilization responses to a large collection of chemokines,
including MCP-1, MCP-2, MCP-3, MCP-5, RANTES, MIP-1
, MIP-1
,
MIP-3
, MIP-3
, MIP-5, IL-8, GRO
, GRO
, CINC-2
, CINC-2
,
NAP2, IP-10 (human and murine), Mig (human and murine), eotaxin-1,
eotaxin-2, ENA-78, PF-4, lymphotactin, PARC, 6Ckine (human and murine),
Fractakine, HCC-1, MDC, TARC, I-309, GCP-2, I-TECK, SDF-1, and I-Tac
(human) using the 96-well fluorescent imaging plate reader. This
technology allowed for the first time the characterization of both
human and rat CXCR3 using the same sister plates of chemokines to
assess their relative potencies. Of the chemokines tested, only IP-10
(human and murine), I-Tac, Mig (human and murine), and murine 6Ckine
induced cytoplasmic calcium transient responses in the rat
CXCR3-transfected HEK 293 cells, and the same ligands, except for
murine 6Ckine, responded in the human CXCR3-transfected cells. The
concentration-dependent calcium mobilization responses for IP-10 (human
and murine), Mig (human and murine), 6Ckine (human and murine), and
I-Tac in the rat and human CXCR3 transfectants are depicted in Fig.
3, A and B, respectively, and in Table
1. There was no response to any ligand in
empty vector (pCDN) transfected or the untransfected parental cell line
(data not shown).
|
|
100 nM, and the values for the human receptor were 13.5, 24.1, 43.3, 9.3, 28.9,
100, and
100 nM, respectively (Fig. 3, A and B). The most
notable difference between the rat and human CXCR3 was that the rat
receptor responded to high concentrations of murine 6Ckine and human
CXCR3 did not.
Cross-desensitization studies were performed using IP-10, I-Tac, and
Mig with both rat and human CXCR3-transfected cells. After being
maximally stimulated (330 nM), these ligands desensitized a second
response to the same ligand. Maximal responses of IP-10 and I-Tac did
not respond to a second stimulation with the other two ligands; but Mig
was unable to completely desensitize the responses to either IP-10 or
I-Tac (data not shown).
125I-IP-10 binds to rat and human
CXCR3-transfected HEK 293 cell membranes with high affinity.
Competition binding studies were run with the same ligands used in the
calcium functional assay. Competition by the ligands for
125I-IP-10 binding, like the calcium responses,
was similar for the transiently transfected rat and human CXCR3 (Fig.
4 and Table 1). Both human and murine
IP-10 displaced with high affinity: IC50 values
were 2.3 and 3.3 nM for rat CXCR3 and 2.4 and 4.1 nM for human CXCR3,
respectively (Fig. 4, A and B). I-Tac displaces with
IC50 values for rat and human CXCR3 of 40 and 145 nM, respectively. Murine Mig displaced with IC50
values of 480 and 880 nM for rat and human CXCR3, respectively, whereas
human Mig did not displace up to 1 µM (Fig. 4, A and B).
|
Expression of CXCR3 mRNA in Rat Cortex after MCAO.
Because a
marked induction of IP-10 was demonstrated in the ischemic cortex after
permanent MCAO (Wang et al., 1998
), we investigated the expression of
CXCR3 mRNA in the ischemic cortex tissues using the same animal model.
Because the level of CXCR3 mRNA expression in cortex is too low to be
detected by Northern analysis, a recently developed sensitive technique
of real-time PCR (Gibson et al., 1996
; Heid et al., 1996
) was applied.
For quantification purposes, we applied the cloned plasmid DNA for rat
CXCR3 and rpL32 (a housekeeping control) as the real-time amplification
standard to determine the absolute copy number of the template (Wang et
al., 2000
). A representative real-time PCR for the determination of
CXCR3 standard is illustrated in Fig. 5,
where the cloned CXCR3 plasmid DNA was in a dilution series of 1.65 to 7.24 log molecule (or 16.4 fg to 64 pg) copies as the
template. The amplification data were normalized with the rpL32 gene,
which is known to be consistently expressed in ischemic brain tissue
(Wang et al., 1998
).
|
|
Binding of 125I-IP-10 to Rat Cortical Membranes after
Focal Brain Ischemia.
To further explore a potential role of
induced expression of IP-10 and CXCR3 in focal stroke, the specific
binding of 125I-IP-10 was performed using
cortical samples at 6 and 24 h and 2 and 10 days after permanent
MCAO. Figure 7 depicts the
125I-IP-10 binding data (0.19-0.24 nM) on
cortical membranes at these time points after ischemia or after sham
surgery. Although specific IP-10 binding was observed in all of the
samples, a significant increase in the ischemic cortical samples was
observed from 24 h (1.8-fold increase over controls;
n = 4, P < .05) to 10 days (2.3-fold
increase; n = 4, P < .01).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our present study reports the molecular cloning and
characterization of a rat ortholog of the chemokine receptor CXCR3. The deduced amino acid sequence of rat CXCR3 is highly conserved among species, sharing 96 and 87% sequence identity (or 98 and 92%
similarity) to the murine and human CXCR3, respectively. The high
conservation of CXCR3 sequence may determine the nature of its specific
interactions to IP-10, I-Tac, Mig, and murine 6Ckine but not the other
chemokines tested. On the other hand, it is interesting to note
differences in the affinity of the rat CXCR3 interaction with its
ligands compared with human and murine CXCR3. As shown here, human and murine IP-10 and murine Mig are more potent ligands than human Mig for
inducing intracellular calcium mobilization and for receptor binding in
rat CXCR3-transfected HEK 293 cells (Figs. 3 and 4). Human 6Ckine
failed to activate this rat receptor, whereas murine 6Ckine showed a
modest response at concentrations of 100 nM. In contrast to the rat
receptor (i.e., human IP-10 > I-Tac > human Mig > murine 6Ckine), the order of ligand potency to induce intracellular calcium mobilization functional responses in human CXCR3-transfected cells is I-Tac > Mig > IP-10 (Loetscher et al., 1996
; Cole
et al., 1998
). Data presented in this report demonstrate that IP-10, I-Tac, and Mig all have similar potencies at the human CXCR3 and that
murine Mig may be the most potent ligand for this receptor. Our data
are also consistent with the previous report (Jenh et al., 1999
) that
no activity was observed in human CXCR3 in response to human or murine
6Ckine. The potencies for the chemokines for the rat and human CXCR3 in
this study should be directly comparable because the receptors were
transfected identically into the HEK 293 cells and the same sister
plate of chemokines were tested against both receptors. The ligand
potency order in mouse is also different (i.e., Mig > IP-10 > 6Ckine; Soto et al., 1998
). Taken together, these data clearly
suggest CXCR3 in different species has some shared but distinct
biochemical and pharmacological/biological features for its interaction
with ligands.
These species differences in biochemical and pharmacological features
of CXCR3 may be explained based on available data. First, sequences are
different among species for both ligands and receptors and their
cross-species interactions. As described in the present report, only an
87% amino acid sequence identity is observed for human and rat CXCR3.
Among the CXCR3 ligands, only the arthologs for IP-10 have been
reported in all three species. Rat IP-10 is known to share 97 and 94%
amino acid sequence similarity to murine and human IP-10, respectively
(Wang et al., 1996
). Therefore, the high affinity of human and murine
IP-10 for rat and human CXCR3 may reflect the highly conserved
sequences in this ligand-receptor pair across the two species. Although
it is still too early to conclude that the low affinity for murine
6Ckine exhibited by rat CXCR3 is due to a cross-species difference,
previous reports show that a specific interaction can be demonstrated
between murine 6Ckine and mouse CXCR3 (Soto et al., 1998
) but not
between human 6Ckine and human/mouse CXCR3 (Jenh et al., 1999
). It is
not clear why human Mig induces a strong calcium response (although
with lower potency than IP-10 and I-Tac) but demonstrates such low affinity to displace the 125I-IP-10 binding to
both rat and human CXCR3. Additional studies are in progress with
labeled I-Tac and human Mig to better understand this observation.
Second, the cell lines used for the transfection and functional assays
may contribute to the discrepant results. Loetscher et al. (1996)
transfected human CXCR3 in mouse preB cells (300-19), human
promyelocytic cells (GM-1), and human acute T cell leukemia cells
(Jurkat), and the transfectants were used for functional assays. HEK
293 cells were used for rat (the present work), mouse (Soto et al.,
1998
), and human (Cole et al., 1998
) CXCR3 transfection. However,
because the data for human CXCR3 transfactants in various cell lines
are comparable (Loetscher et al., 1996
; Cole et al., 1998
), this cell
line possibility could be excluded. In addition, other factors, such as
the source of chemokines and the levels of G-proteins expressed in the
cells, may contribute to the discrepant results. To this end, we
obtained chemokines (especially the CXCR3 ligands, IP-10, Mig, I-Tac,
and 6Ckine) from various manufacturers and tested/confirmed their biological activities. Moreover, because many receptors are not functionally coupled to
Ca2+/IP3 in HEK 293 cells
in the absence of a "promiscuous" G protein or a G protein chimera
(Offermanns and Simon, 1995
), we transfected CXCR3 into the cells in
the absence or presence of G
15, G
16, Gqi5, Gqo5, and Gqs5
expression vectors and determined that the best calcium mobilization
response was in the presence of Gqi5 (Wilkie et al., 1991
; Schroeder
and Neagle, 1996
). Therefore, our present study was performed by
cotransfecting CXCR3 with Gqi5 expression vectors in HEK 293 cells.
The induction profile of CXCR3 mRNA after focal stroke in rat is
interesting. The message began to increase as early as 12 h but
did not reach significance until 2 and 5 days after MCAO. In contrast,
IP-10 mRNA was significantly induced as early as 3 h and reached a
peak expression at 6 h after MCAO; the second wave induction of
IP-10 mRNA was observed much later at 10 and 15 days (Wang et al.,
1998
). Clearly, the mRNA expression profiles of the ligand and receptor
are not the same. In addition, the specific binding to CXCR3 (to a
significant level at 24 h after stroke) preceded the significantly
elevated level of the mRNA (2 days). It is possible that the high basal
level of CXCR3 mRNA expression in the brain (Fig. 6) may be responsible
to the early increase in the specific CXCR3 binding activity and thus
may react to the first wave of IP-10 induction after ischemic insult
before the induced expression of the receptor, whereas the second wave of IP-10 induction correlated with the increased expression of CXCR3
and enhanced binding activity after ischemic brain injury.
The cellular sources of CXCR3 expression in normal and ischemic brain
have not been investigated. Other studies indicated that activated T
cells are likely the preferential cellular source for CXCR3 expression
(Loetscher et al., 1996
; Qin et al., 1998
). Immunohistochemical studies
of various inflammatory tissues (including rheumatoid arthritis,
chronic vaginitis, and ulcerative colitis) revealed that virtually all
T cells within the lesions, particularly in perivascular regions,
expressed CXCR3 (Qin et al., 1998
). Similar CXCR3 expression is
localized to T cells of perivascular inflammatory infiltrate in the
central nervous system of patients with multiple sclerosis (Sorensen et
al., 1999
). In addition to massive infiltration of leukocytes in the
ischemic brain (Kochanek and Hallenbeck, 1992
; Clark et al., 1993
;
Garcia et al., 1994
), T cells were also detected in ischemic brain
lesions by using T cell-specific markers (Schroeter et al., 1994
;
Jander et al., 1995
). CD5+ T cells were detected
on the pial surface at day 1 and with increasing numbers at the edges
of infarcts at days 3 and 7 after brain MCAO in rats, along with a
significant number of
CD5
/CD8+ natural killer
cells in the lesion (Schroeter et al., 1994
). A similar profile of T
cell infiltration into the ischemic lesion was reported for the
photochemically induced focal ischemia in rat (Jander et al., 1995
).
These data suggest that the infiltrated/accumulated T cells and natural
killer cells in the ischemic brain tissue may be the cellular sources
contributing to the induced expression of CXCR3 after stroke.
Therefore, an antagonist of CXCR3 may decrease the extent of
inflammatory cell infiltration/accumulation after ischemic injury.
It is also interesting to note that the elevated expression of CXCR3
mRNA correlates with the accumulation of macrophages in the ischemic
lesion in the same animal model (Clark et al., 1993
; Barone et al.,
1995
), suggesting that ischemia-induced expression of IP-10 and CXCR3
may contribute to leukocyte infiltration/accumulation after brain
injury, as has been demonstrated previously in vitro (Taub et al.,
1993
). In addition, the similar profiles of CXCR3 expression/binding
activity and gliosis, as well as the chemotactic property of IP-10 on
astroglia (Wang et al., 1998
), could not exclude a possible role of
IP-10/CXCR3 in gliosis after ischemic brain injury.
In conclusion, the present study describes the cloning and characterization of the rat ortholog of CXCR3 and demonstrates its distinct biochemical, pharmacological, and biological properties. The temporal expression of CXCR3 mRNA, along with its specific ligand IP-10, and the increased IP-10 binding activity that occurs after stroke suggest that this ligand and receptor are actively involved in the inflammatory reaction, and possibly gliosis, after ischemic brain injury and that CXCR3 antagonists may therefore provide a novel therapeutic opportunity in ischemic stroke.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Raymond White for excellent technical assistance on the animal model, Parvathi Nuthulaganti for performing cell transfection, and Ganesh Sathe and his laboratory colleagues for DNA sequencing and oligonucleotide synthesis.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 29, 1999; Accepted February 23, 2000
Send reprint requests to: Xinkang Wang, Ph.D., Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Experimental Station, E400/3420B, Wilmington, DE 19880-0400. E-mail: xinkang.wang{at}dupontpharma.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
IP-10, interferon-inducible protein-10;
Mig, interferon-
-induced monokine;
I-Tac, interferon-inducible T cell
-chemoattractant;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
MCAO, occlusion of
the middle cerebral artery;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends;
RT, reverse transcription;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
Ct, threshold
cycle;
RANTES, regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and
secreted;
MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein;
ENA, epithelial-derived
neutrophil-activating peptide;
PARC, pulmonary and activation-regulated
chemokine;
HCC, hemofiltrate C-C chemokine;
MDC, macrophage-derived
chemokine;
TARC, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine;
GCP, granulocyte chemotactic protein;
GRP, growth-related oncogen protein;
PF, platelet factor;
SDF, stromal cell-derived protein;
CINC, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant;
MCP, monocyte chemotactic
protein;
IL, interleukin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 and G
16 couple a wide variety of receptors to phospholipase C.
J Biol Chem
270:
15175-15180
mRNA in ischemic brain tolerance.
J Neurosci Res
59:
238-246[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Verzijl, S. Storelli, D. J. Scholten, L. Bosch, T. A. Reinhart, D. N. Streblow, C. P. Tensen, C. P. Fitzsimons, G. J. R. Zaman, J. E. Pease, et al. Noncompetitive Antagonism and Inverse Agonism as Mechanism of Action of Nonpeptidergic Antagonists at Primate and Rodent CXCR3 Chemokine Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2008; 325(2): 544 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. B. Dimitrijevic, S. M. Stamatovic, R. F. Keep, and A. V. Andjelkovic Absence of the Chemokine Receptor CCR2 Protects Against Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1345 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Colvin, G. S. V. Campanella, L. A. Manice, and A. D. Luster CXCR3 Requires Tyrosine Sulfation for Ligand Binding and a Second Extracellular Loop Arginine Residue for Ligand-Induced Chemotaxis Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(15): 5838 - 5849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, D. Huang, M. Matsui, T. T. He, T. Hu, J. DeMartino, B. Lu, C. Gerard, and R. M. Ransohoff Severe Disease, Unaltered Leukocyte Migration, and Reduced IFN-{gamma} Production in CXCR3-/- Mice with Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4399 - 4409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Mailliard, S. M. Alber, H. Shen, S. C. Watkins, J. M. Kirkwood, R. B. Herberman, and P. Kalinski IL-18-induced CD83+CCR7+ NK helper cells J. Exp. Med., October 3, 2005; 202(7): 941 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Heise, A. Pahuja, S. C. Hudson, M. S. Mistry, A. L. Putnam, M. M. Gross, P. A. Gottlieb, W. S. Wade, M. Kiankarimi, D. Schwarz, et al. Pharmacological Characterization of CXC Chemokine Receptor 3 Ligands and a Small Molecule Antagonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1263 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L Nagpal, Y. Chen, and T. Lin Effects of overexpression of CXCL10 (cytokine-responsive gene-2) on MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cell steroidogenesis and proliferation J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 183(3): 585 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Dijkstra, S. Hulshof, P. van der Valk, H. W. G. M. Boddeke, and K. Biber Cutting Edge: Activity of Human Adult Microglia in Response to CC Chemokine Ligand 21 J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 2744 - 2747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Stanford and T. B. Issekutz The relative activity of CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands in T lymphocyte migration: concordant and disparate activities in vitro and in vivo J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2003; 74(5): 791 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Belperio, M. P. Keane, M. D. Burdick, J. P. Lynch III, D. A. Zisman, Y. Y. Xue, K. Li, A. Ardehali, D. J. Ross, and R. M. Strieter Role of CXCL9/CXCR3 Ch |