![]() |
|
|
Vol. 58, Issue 4, 802-813, October 2000
Department of Pharmacology, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Illinois (A.C.A., M.K.); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Irvine, California (G.L.); and Cortex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Irvine, California (G.R.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R,S-
-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic
acid (AMPA) receptor up-modulators of the benzamide type
("ampakines") have previously been shown to enhance excitatory
synaptic transmission in vivo and in vitro and AMPA receptor currents
in excised patches. The present study analyzed the effects of an
ampakine (CX614; 2H,3H,6aH-pyrrolidino[2",1"-3',2']1,3-oxazino[6',5'-5,4]benzo[e]1,4-dioxan-10-one) that belongs to a benzoxazine subgroup characterized by greater structural rigidity and higher potency. CX614 enhanced the size (amplitude and duration) of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in
hippocampal slices and autaptically evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents in neuronal cultures with EC50 values of 20 to 40 µM. The compound blocked desensitization (EC50 = 44 µM) and slowed deactivation of responses to glutamate by a factor of
8.4 in excised patches. Currents through homomeric, recombinant AMPA
receptors were enhanced with EC50 values that did not
differ greatly across GluR1-3 flop subunits (19-37 µM) but revealed
slightly lower potency at corresponding flip variants. Competition
experiments using modulation of [3H]fluorowillardiine
binding suggested that CX614 and cyclothiazide share a common binding
site but cyclothiazide seems to bind to an additional site not
recognized by the ampakine. CX614 did not reverse the effect of GYKI
52466 on responses to brief glutamate pulses, which indicates that they
act through separate sites, a conclusion that was confirmed in binding
experiments. In sum, these results extend prior evidence that ampakines
are effective in enhancing synaptic responses, most likely by slowing
deactivation, and that their effects are exerted through sites that are
only in part shared with other modulators.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
list of compounds that modulate
R,S-
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic
acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors has grown steadily since the
nootropic drug aniracetam was discovered to increase currents mediated
by the receptors (Ito et al., 1990
). Although aniracetam proved useful
for experimental purposes (Staubli et al., 1990
; Isaacson and Nicoll,
1991
; Tang et al., 1991
), it has been largely supplanted by more potent
and metabolically stable compounds. The first of these to be introduced
were diazoxide and cyclothiazide (CTZ), two benzothiadiazides used
clinically as antihypertensives or diuretics. CTZ potently blocks the
AMPA receptor's rapid desensitization (Yamada and Rothman, 1992
;
Yamada and Tang, 1993
). Surprisingly, given their potent effects in
excised patch studies, the benzothiadiazides proved to have very modest effects on the size and wave form of synaptic responses in hippocampal slices (Randle et al., 1993
; Larson et al., 1994
; Arai and Lynch, 1998b
). Re-examination in patches showed that although CTZ is indeed
potent in blocking desensitization during long agonist applications, it
produces only modest changes when very brief pulses, corresponding to
transmitter release events, were used (Arai and Lynch, 1998a
,b
). These
observations led to the conclusion that desensitization, at least in
the hippocampus, plays a minor role in shaping synaptic responses.
Recent work using isolated synaptic responses has confirmed this
conclusion (Hjelmstad et al., 1999
).
Ampakines constitute a second, still evolving group of modulators that
were originally derived from aniracetam. Unlike the benzothiadiazides,
ampakines cause rapid, fully reversible, and pronounced increases in
hippocampal synaptic responses (Arai et al., 1994
; Staubli et al.,
1994a
,b
) without detectably affecting membrane potential or inhibitory
transmission (Arai et al., 1996b
). Effects on desensitization in
excised patches vary with drug structure but in most cases are less
pronounced than those seen with CTZ. However, ampakines are
considerably more effective in prolonging patch responses to 1-ms
pulses of glutamate (Arai et al., 1996b
; Arai and Lynch, 1998a
). These
results have led to the conclusions that ampakines slow both
deactivation (channel closing, transmitter dissociation) and
desensitization rates and that they modify transmission because of the
former effect (Arai and Lynch, 1998b
).
The different although overlapping effects produced by these two drug
groups suggest the possibility that they recognize different sites on
the AMPA receptor and/or have different affinities for AMPA receptor
subunits. With regard to the latter question, experiments using
recombinant, homomeric receptors established that aniracetam (Partin et
al., 1996
) does not have the marked flip/flop preferences exhibited by
CTZ, and binding tests suggested a similar conclusion for ampakines
(Hennegriff et al., 1997
; Kessler et al., 1998
). Tentative evidence for
distinct sites on the receptor has been provided by the observation
that aniracetam and CTZ respond differently to point mutations (Partin
et al., 1996
). However, most studies on ampakines were carried out with
drugs that had much lower apparent affinity than CTZ. This difference
in affinity could by itself be a decisive factor in that perhaps only
receptor-drug interactions involving a minimal amount of binding energy
might be able to produce the particular effects of a compound such as
CTZ.
Continuing progress in resolving structure-activity relationships has
now resulted in ampakines with at least 10-fold higher potencies. The
early generation drugs contained two separate ring structures connected
through a carbonyl group ("BDP" in Fig.
1). In one subgroup of ampakines,
referred to as benzoxazines, these two elements have been connected via
a heteroatom, which thus closes an additional ring and confers greater
rigidity. The benzoxazine CX614
(2H,3H,6aH-pyrrolidino[2",1"-3',2']1,3-oxazino[6',5'-5,4]benzo[e]1,4-dioxan-10-one; Fig. 1) was used in the present study to compare its effects with those described previously for CTZ with regard to synaptic currents, aspects of receptor kinetics (such as deactivation and
desensitization), subunit preferences, and agonist binding, and to test
for competitive interactions with CTZ. Drug interactions were also
studied between CX614 and GYKI 52466 (GYKI,
1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride; Tarnawa et al., 1992
), a member of a third group of
modulators that reduce AMPA receptor currents. Initial
suggestions that GYKI compounds are inverse modulators of the CTZ site
(e.g., Zorumski et al., 1993
) were not confirmed by later analyses
(e.g., Johansen et al., 1995
; Kessler et al., 1996
; Partin and Mayer, 1996
; Yamada and Turetsky, 1996
), but the possibility of a similar relationship with ampakines remained to be explored because GYKI shares
a benzodioxole element in its structure with some of the latter drugs.
|
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Extracellular Recording in Hippocampal Slices.
Preparation
of slices and recording methods have been described previously (Arai et
al., 1996b
). In brief, 400-µm slices were prepared from male
Sprague-Dawley rats (150-200 g) that had been decapitated under
anesthesia. The slices were transferred to a linear interface chamber
perfused with oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (0.5 ml/min, 35°C). Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were
recorded from the stratum radiatum with stimulation intensity adjusted
to provide 50% of the maximum EPSP amplitude. Drug containing medium
was prepared from a 500 mM stock solution of CX614 in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) and was infused into the recording chamber with a
syringe pump; the highest DMSO concentration of 0.2% did not influence
synaptic transmission.
Whole-Cell Recordings from Hippocampal Primary Cultures.
Whole-cell recordings were made from neuronal cultures prepared from
the hippocampus with a slight modification of the method of Baughman et
al. (1991)
. In brief, hippocampi from E16-18 Sprague-Dawley rats were
isolated in ice-cold minimal essential medium (MEM) and cut into
small pieces. The tissue was incubated with 0.05% trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA
at 37°C for 30 min. After centrifugation (900 rpm), the tissue pellet
was suspended in plating MEM containing 5% fetal calf serum,
penicillin/streptomycin, 10 µM MK-801, and 100 µM
2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5), and was gently triturated with Pasteur pipettes of various tip diameters until the
cells were completely dispersed. The cell suspension was plated onto a
recording chamber (Nunc, Naperville, CT) with microislands coated with
(poly)D-lysine (0.02 mg/ml). The cells were fed every week
by replacing approximately one-third of the medium containing 5% fetal
calf serum (without NMDA receptor antagonists) and were grown for 10 to
25 days at 37°C. Whole-cell recordings were made from islands
containing a solitary neuron (for autaptic response) or multiple cells
(for asynchronous activity) with mature morphological characteristics
(i.e., elaborate dendritic arbors with primary and higher order
branches). The extracellular recording solution contained 140 mM NaCl,
4 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM
glucose, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.37, and was supplemented with 50 µM
picrotoxin, 10 µM MK-801, and 100 µM AP5. The intrapipette solution
contained 130 mM CsF, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM ATP disodium salt, and 10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4. Holding potential was
60 mV or as indicated. Both
autaptic and asynchronously induced responses were evoked by clamping
the membrane potential at +20 mV for 1 ms. Neurons from which
recordings were made were identified immunohistochemically by fixing
with 4% paraformaldehyde and visualizing with antibodies against MAP2,
neurofilament, or synaptophysin.
Excised-Patch Recordings.
Patch clamp studies were carried
out with outside-out patches excised from CA1 pyramidal neurons of
organotypic hippocampal slices. Slice cultures were prepared from 13 to
14-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats and grown for 2 weeks on cellulose
membrane inserts (Millipore CM; Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA) in
an incubator (Arai et al., 1996b
). For recording, a slice was
transferred to a chamber and immersed in a medium containing 125 mM
NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM
KH2PO4, 2 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
NaHCO3, 25 mM D-glucose, and 20 mM
HEPES, pH 7.3. A patch was excised and relocated to an adjacent
recording chamber perfused with recording medium containing: 130 mM
NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES, 0.01 mM MK-801, and 0.05 mM
D-AP5. Patch pipettes had a resistance of 3 to 8 M
and
were filled with a solution containing 65 mM CsF, 65 mM CsCl, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP disodium salt, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3.
-shaped cross-section. Both flow
lines could be switched between multiple reservoirs. The excised patch
was initially positioned in the background stream. Actuation of the
piezo translator moved the double barrel pipette such that the patch
was exposed to the glutamate flow line, and then returned to the
original position after a predetermined time of 1 ms or longer.
Typically, five responses were collected and averaged. For tests
involving drugs, both background and glutamate flow lines were switched
to solutions containing the drug of interest at the same concentration,
and after about 30 s of equilibration, testing with glutamate
pulses was resumed. Measurements with a given patch were alternated
repeatedly between control condition and various test conditions with
drug. For data analysis, responses with drug were compared with the
averaged control responses taken before and after the drug response.
Holding potentials were
50 mV. Data were acquired with a patch
amplifier (AxoPatch-1D) at a filter frequency of 5 kHz and digitized at
10 kHz with PClamp/Digidata 1200 (Axon Instruments, Burlingame, CA).
Deactivation rates were determined by fitting the decay phase of 1-ms
pulse with a single-exponential or, if necessary, two-exponential
function. CX614 solutions were prepared from a 500 mM stock solution in
DMSO; the highest DMSO concentrations were 0.2% in the dose-response
study and 0.5% when measuring competition with GYKI. The same final
concentration of DMSO was included in all drug and control solutions.
Whole-Cell Recordings from HEK 293 Cells.
Patch-clamp
recordings were carried out in whole-cell configuration. HEK 293 cells
that stably express homomeric AMPA receptors (rat GluR1-3; Yamada and
Turetsky, 1996
; Hennegriff et al., 1997
) were transferred to a
recording chamber (Nunc) at least a day before the experiment.
Recordings were made at 25°C in serum-free MEM. Patch pipettes (3-7
M
) were filled with a solution containing 130 mM CsF, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM disodium ATP salt, and 10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4. The holding potential was
100 mV. Agonist application
was made with a fast-solution switch system in which cells are exposed
to a constant flow of the background solution that is momentarily
stopped on application of the glutamate-containing medium. The drugs
were included in both background- and agonist-containing solutions.
Recordings with each cell were alternated between reference measurements (glutamate + 300 µM CX614) and test conditions. Data analysis was carried out as described above and concentration-response relations for CX614 and CTZ were constructed relative to the response obtained with 300 µM CX614.
Binding Assays.
Rat brain membranes were prepared from the
telencephalon according to conventional procedures (Kessler et al.,
1996
), which involved differential centrifugation to obtain a
P2 pellet fraction, osmotic lysis and repeated
washing by centrifugation, and resuspending in the assay buffer (100 mM
HEPES/Tris, 50 µM EGTA, pH 7.4). Frozen aliquots (
80°C) were
thawed, sonicated, and washed twice by centrifugation. For tests with
recombinant receptors, HEK 293 cells were suspended into physiological
saline, collected by low-speed centrifugation (1,000g for 5 min), and resuspended in neutral 10 mM Tris/acetate. The cells were
then homogenized by tip sonication and spun down at 45,000g
for 30 min. The last step was repeated, after which the membranes were
suspended in the assay buffer of 50 mM HEPES/Tris, pH 7.4. Binding
tests with rat brain membranes were conducted at 25°C with the
centrifugation method. Aliquots of the membrane suspension were
incubated with radiolabeled compound and appropriate additions. Sets of
24 samples were then centrifuged for 20 min at 25,000g with
rotor temperature maintained at 25°C. The supernatant was aspirated
and the pellet quickly rinsed with ice-cold saline plus 50 mM potassium
thiocyanate (wash buffer). Binding incubations with HEK 293 cell
membranes were carried out at 0°C and terminated by filtration
through GF/C filters after dilution in 5 ml of ice-cold wash buffer;
the filters were rapidly washed with 3 volumes of additional wash
buffer. Drugs were added from 100-fold concentrated solutions in DMSO;
separate mixing tests verified that these procedures do not result in
drug precipitation. Control samples received the equivalent amount of
DMSO (maximum, 2%). Background values ("nonspecific binding") were
measured by inclusion of 5 mM L-glutamate and
subtracted from total binding; separate background values were
determined for incubations with and without drug. Protein content was
determined according to Bradford (1976)
with the reagent available from Bio-Rad and with bovine serum albumin as standard. Binding curves were fitted to the data points through nonlinear regression (Prism; GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Materials. [3H]6-Cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) was purchased from NEN/DuPont (Boston, MA), [3H]fluorowillardiine from Tocris Cookson (St. Louis, MO). Chemicals to prepare physiological media were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). MEM was obtained from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Cyclothiazide, GYKI, MK-801, and AP5 were purchased from RBI (Natick, MA). Nunc recording chambers for cell culture are distributed by Fisher (Pittsburgh, PA). Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington, MA); the animals were housed, cared for, and sacrificed according to an institutionally approved protocol and the guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of CX614 on Field EPSPs and Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents
(EPSCs).
Effects of CX614 on field EPSPs were examined in stratum
radiatum of hippocampal field CA1 in slices that were maintained at
35°C in an interface chamber and continuously subfused with oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Application of 30 µM CX614
produced an increase of ~40% in the amplitude and ~80% in the
half-width of the response. This effect had a rapid onset, peaked
within 20 min of drug application, and was fully reversed after 1 h of washing out the drug (Fig. 2, A and
B). Significant changes in EPSP amplitude and half-width were observed
at concentrations as low as 5 µM (Fig. 2A, right). Dose-response
relations plotted in Fig. 2C provide EC50
estimates on the order of 30 µM for the amplitude and 18 µM
(nH = 1.7) for the half-width of the
response; maximal effects could not be reliably determined because
concentrations of 100 µM and above usually caused instability.
|
|
Effect of CX614 on AMPA Receptors in Excised Patches: Comparison
with CTZ.
Drug effects on AMPA receptor kinetics were analyzed in
patches excised from CA1 pyramidal cells of cultured hippocampal slices in the presence of AP5 and MK-801. Step application of 1 mM glutamate produced an inward current that declined because of receptor
desensitization to a steady-state level of 5 to 10% with a time
constant of about 10 ms (Fig. 4; Arai et
al., 1995
, 1996a
,b
). CX614 raised the steady-state current without
affecting the rate at which it was reached and it abolished any decay
of the response at concentrations above 300 µM. The response profile
at intermediate drug concentrations probably represents a superposition
of the current produced by one subpopulation of receptors that have
bound CX614 and do not desensitize plus the current from the remaining
receptors that have not bound the drug. The steady-state current thus
provides a measure for the fraction of receptors that have bound the
drug. A dose-response relation is shown on the left side of Fig. 4 in which the steady-state current is expressed as a percentage of the peak
response without drug. The EC50 value was 43 µM
(nH = 1.08) and the maximum was about
200%. Glutamate at 1 mM produces about half-saturation (Arai et al.,
1995
); thus, responses at high concentrations of CX614 reached about
the same amplitude as responses produced by saturating concentrations
of glutamate alone. This accords with previous observations using other
modulators (Arai et al., 1996a
) and with the finding that the
EC50 for glutamate in general is shifted toward
lower concentrations by such drugs (Yamada and Tang, 1993
). The shift
in the EC50 value of the peak current toward
higher concentration (Fig. 4B) probably reflects a delay in the time to
peak at subsaturating drug concentrations.
|
|
Effect of CX614 on Recombinant AMPA Receptors Expressed in HEK 293 Cells.
HEK 293 cells stably expressing recombinant AMPA receptors
from rat (Yamada and Turetsky, 1996
; Hennegriff et al., 1997
) were used
to examine whether CX614 possesses a preference for specific subunits
or their splice variants "flip" and "flop". Figure
6 shows the effects of CX614 together
with those of CTZ on glutamate-induced currents. CX614 increased the
peak current in all recombinant receptors tested, the effect in general
reaching a maximum at concentrations of 100 to 300 µM;
EC50 values are listed in Table 1. The potency of CX614 was similar
across the three types of flop subunits tested with
EC50 values ranging from 19 to 37 µM. However,
in both flip-flop pairs, the drug showed a modest preference for the
flop subunit with values of 37 µM for GluR2 flop and 19 µM for
GluR3 flop versus 46 and 71 µM for the respective flip variants. This
pattern of preferences, which was reproduced in binding tests, is
opposite that of CTZ (Table 1; Hennegriff et al., 1997
). Notable
differences were also seen in the response kinetics. For CTZ, the
apparent affinity correlated with the extent to which desensitization
was attenuated in that desensitization was completely blocked in flip
subunits, whereas the lower affinity flop subunits exhibited at most a
slowing of desensitization. In contrast, CX614 did not completely block
the decay of the response of any receptor type and there was no evident
relation with the EC50 [i.e., the decay of the
response at a high CX614 concentration was slower in GluR3 flip
(EC50 71 µM) than in GluR1 flop (21 µM) and
GluR3 flop (19 µM, not shown) receptors].
|
|
Interaction between CX614 and GYKI on AMPA Receptor Currents.
If two compounds act through a common site, then the one present in
excess relative to its affinity should prevail in a competition situation. To test this, dose-response curves were established for the
effect of CX614 on glutamate-induced currents at fixed concentrations
of GYKI (Fig. 7). GYKI decreased the peak
amplitude of glutamate responses induced by prolonged application by
40% at 10 µM and by 80% at 100 µM (Fig. 7B). Addition of CX614
fully reversed this reduction; i.e., the response amplitudes
extrapolated to saturating concentrations of CX614 were comparable with
and without GYKI present (Fig. 7, A, bottom, and B). A different result was obtained, however, when the same experiment was carried out with
1-ms applications of glutamate (Fig. 7, E and F). GYKI was effective in
reducing the peak glutamate current, as with long glutamate
applications, but CX614, even at 2 mM, could not reverse the effects of
GYKI to any substantial degree. The discordant results from these two
paradigms suggest that there are differences in the drug interactions
on the early and later aspects of the responses to prolonged glutamate
applications. This was confirmed (Fig. 7C) when responses to long
glutamate applications were reanalyzed to determine the amplitude at a
fixed latency of 1.2 ms (i.e., at a time when responses in the absence
of drug almost reached their peak) (Fig. 7D). GYKI (100 µM) slowed
the rise phase significantly (Fig. 7D, open circles) and CX614 was not
able to counteract this. The slowing of the rise phase was also
observed in the presence of 10 µM GYKI (data not shown). These
results thus indicate that the ability of GYKI to block AMPA receptor
currents is reduced or eliminated when receptors have bound an
ampakine, but that GYKI nevertheless greatly slows the onset of the
responses. Evidently, it could not do so unless it was bound to the
receptor; thus, one must assume that it binds to a site from which it
cannot be displaced by the ampakines.
|
Interactions of CX614 with GYKI and CTZ: Tests with
[3H]Fluorowillardiine Binding.
Most AMPA receptor
modulators change the binding affinity for agonists such as
[3H]AMPA or
[3H]fluorowillardiine and the
EC50 values are generally similar to those in
physiological experiments (Hall et al., 1993
; Arai et al., 1996b
,
Kessler et al., 1996
). Measuring agonist binding thus provides a method
by which to study drug interactions. CX614 by itself produced an
increase in the binding of
[3H]fluorowillardiine (Fig.
8B) with an EC50
value of 88 µM. An increase was also observed for the affinity of
glutamate, which was derived from its ability to displace the binding
of [3H]CNQX (Fig. 8A). The
IC50 value for the displacement by glutamate decreased from 44 µM without drug to 12.5 µM at 1 mM CX614;
replotting the IC50 values against the drug
concentrations provides an EC50-value estimate
for CX614 of 22 µM. The difference in the
EC50 from Fig. 8B may be caused by the choice of
the agonist (fluorowillardiine versus glutamate) or by the fact that
[3H]CNQX displacement preferentially probes the
dominant population of low-affinity receptor sites, whereas binding of
radiolabeled agonists accords greater weight to the small population of
high-affinity sites (Hall et al., 1992
).
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study introduced an ampakine that is considerably more
potent in enhancing synaptic transmission in hippocampal slices than
those described in previous reports. Threshold concentration for a
detectable increase in the field EPSPs was about 5 µM, and the
EC50 value was on the order of 20 to 40 µM.
These values are about 10 times lower than those reported for CX516 (or
BDP-12; Arai et al., 1996b
), the ampakine most extensively tested in
animals and humans. Increases of 50 to 100% in response amplitude and duration were readily obtained after 20 min of drug infusion, and
return to baseline was rapid, as with earlier ampakines. Similar changes in the time course of AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs were observed in autaptic synaptic responses in primary hippocampal neurons.
A major point of interest is that this action profile is similar for
all ampakines, regardless of their potency, yet remarkably distinct
from that of CTZ, which, despite its well characterized efficacy in
blocking receptor desensitization, produces only modest changes in the
wave form of individual field EPSPs. We have reported elsewhere,
however, that the effects of these drugs on synaptic responses
correlate with their ability to slow deactivation of patch responses to
1-ms glutamate pulses (Arai and Lynch, 1998b
). The data shown here
confirm this point in that CX614
in keeping with its sizeable effect
on synaptic responses
was much more effective than CTZ in slowing
deactivation. Taken together, these observations suggest that the decay
of fast responses is determined to a much lesser degree by
desensitization than by channel closing and transmitter dissociation
and that the ampakines more prominently act on the latter. Equilibrium
binding studies provided additional evidence in this regard. Receptor
affinity was substantially increased by CX614, as would be expected
from the idea that the drug decreases deactivation rates by slowing
transmitter dissociation or channel closing (Ambros-Ingerson and Lynch,
1993
). The decrease in binding typically produced by CTZ
similarly accords with earlier arguments that the drug shifts AMPA
receptor kinetics away from the desensitized state (Hall et al., 1993
;
Kessler et al., 1996
).
EC50 values comparable with those in slices and
patches were also obtained when CX614 was tested on recombinant,
homomeric AMPA receptors. The ampakine did not have strong subunit
preferences but seemed to prefer the flop over the corresponding flip
variants. This pattern, which was seen in both physiological and
binding tests, is similar to that reported for aniracetam (Tsuzuki et al., 1992
; Partin et al., 1996
) and distinct from that of CTZ, which,
as in previous studies (Partin et al., 1994
), had a 5- to 10-fold
higher affinity for flip isoforms. Also, CTZ exhibited an obvious
relationship between affinity and efficacy in blocking desensitization,
but no such relation was seen with CX614. This may indicate again that
the ampakine influenced aspects of receptor kinetics other than or in
addition to desensitization.
The competition experiments led to the conclusion that the modulators
examined in this study most probably act through three distinct sites
(Fig. 10). Both binding and
physiological tests clearly indicated lack of competition between CX614
and GYKI, despite partial structural homology. In the patch
experiments, CX614 could not reverse the inhibition by GYKI of brief
glutamate responses. With long glutamate applications, CX614 seemed to
reverse the inhibitory effects of GYKI, but closer inspection of the
traces showed that the currents measured at high GYKI + CX614
concentrations had a greatly increased rise time, which evidently means
that both drugs were acting simultaneously on the same receptor. A delay of the peak onset by GYKI has been shown in other studies with
heteromeric recombinant receptors (Johansen et al., 1995
) and native
AMPA receptors (Rammes et al., 1996
). A plausible explanation would be
that GYKI slows either channel opening or the association of glutamate
with the receptor, as suggested in the latter report. Because changes
in the association rate should greatly alter binding affinity
(Ambros-Ingerson and Lynch, 1993
) and GYKI, when given alone, did not
change binding, a slowing of channel opening seems to be the most
likely effect of the drug.
|
The interaction between CX614 and GYKI thus evidently occurs at the
level of receptor kinetics by acting on a shared set of kinetic
parameters. A plausible scenario would be that CX614 prominently slows
channel closing and that this can effectively counteract the slowing of
channel opening caused by GYKI, provided that glutamate is present long
enough that a steady state can be reached. It would also provide a
satisfactory interpretation for the binding results of Fig. 8.
Calculations using an equation for the binding KD in a five-state receptor model
(Ambros-Ingerson and Lynch, 1993
) readily show that a slowing of
channel closing by CX614 would significantly increase binding affinity,
whereas a slowing of channel opening by GYKI would have negligible
effects on agonist binding but would effectively oppose any affinity
increase caused by a drug that slows channel closing. That GYKI did not
reverse the binding changes caused by CTZ (Kessler et al., 1996
) again would agree with the notion that CTZ acts more prominently on desensitization kinetics rather than on aspects of channel gating.
Interactions between CX614 and CTZ were of more complex nature, suggesting in the end that they act through two separate sites, one of which would bind both drugs, the other one being rather selective for CTZ. Because we employed homomeric receptors in which all subunits are identical, the two sites cannot be homologous loci on different subunits. It cannot be ruled out, of course, that other forms of receptor heterogeneity exist, perhaps caused by different degrees of post-translational modification (such as phosphorylation). No such influences on drug affinity have been described, however, nor would they be likely to explain the data of Fig. 9A unless binding of CX614 would be controlled in an all-or-none fashion. Thus, the presence of two distinct sites for up-modulatory drugs on each subunit remains the most probable explanation. The suggested interactions of CX614, CTZ, and GYKI with the receptor and the hypothesized kinetic targets are summarized in Fig. 10. CX614 is proposed to have a mixed influence on desensitization and channel gating kinetics, reflecting its efficacy in completely blocking desensitization and its ability to prolong response deactivation more than 8-fold. Cyclothiazide may share some of these effects; however, by virtue of its binding to a second site more closely linked to desensitization, it may act more prominently on the latter aspect of receptor kinetics.
In conclusion, changes in ampakine design to confer structural rigidity
increased potency by at least an order of magnitude without markedly
changing the modulatory actions found in earlier drugs. Like BDP (Arai
et al., 1994
) and BDP-20 (Arai et al., 1996a
), CX614 increased the
amplitude and especially the duration of field EPSPs, slowed receptor
deactivation, and increased the affinity of AMPA receptors for
agonists. Thus, the contrast between the effects of ampakines and those
of CTZ can no longer be ascribed to any gradient in potency and points
instead to a different action on receptor kinetics. Drug interaction
experiments suggested that AMPA receptors may indeed have at least two
sites for up-modulators, in addition to a site for down-modulators.
With further improvements in the potency of the modulatory compounds,
we hope that it will be possible to study the identity of these sites
using radiolabeled variants of the drugs.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Drs. Dennis Choi and Dorothy Turetsky for providing the HEK 293 cell lines expressing GluR3-flip subunits, and Dr. Martin Hennegriff for preparing the other cell lines.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 22, 2000; Accepted June 23, 2000
This work was supported by grants from Cortex Pharmaceuticals (CP19982), the National Science Foundation (IBN-9806215), and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620-95-1-0304).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. A. Arai, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Dept. of Pharmacology, 801 N. Rutledge, Springfield, IL 62794-9629. E-mail: aarai{at}siumed.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AMPA, R,S-
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic
acid;
CTZ, cyclothiazide;
GYKI, GYKI 52466;
EPSP, excitatory
postsynaptic potential;
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
MEM, minimal
essential medium;
AP5, 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid;
CNQX, 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione;
EPSC, excitatory postsynaptic
current.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Mitchell and M. W. Fleck Targeting AMPA Receptor Gating Processes with Allosteric Modulators and Mutations Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2392 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jin, S. Clark, A. M. Weeks, J. T. Dudman, E. Gouaux, and K. M. Partin Mechanism of Positive Allosteric Modulators Acting on AMPA Receptors J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 9027 - 9036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jourdi, |