![]() |
|
|
Vol. 60, Issue 1, 143-154, July 2001
Departments of Medicine (C.Y., S.G.), Pharmacology (S.G.), Biochemistry (S.W., S.G.), and Radiation Oncology (P.D.), Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase
kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK/MAPK) cascade have been
examined in relation to paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in human monocytic
leukemia cells (U937). Cells treated with paclitaxel (250 nm; 6 h)
followed by PD98059 (40 µM; 15 h) exhibited a significant increase in mitochondrial dysfunction (e.g., cytochrome
c release), caspase activation, poly ADP-ribose
polymerase cleavage, and apoptosis, whereas pretreatment of cells with
PD98059 reduced lethality. Similar results were obtained with other
MEK/MAPK inhibitors (e.g., U0126 and PD184352). Subsequent exposure of
paclitaxel-treated cells to PD98059 did not enhance
dephosphorylation/activation of p34cdc2 but diminished
expression of the antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1. The caspase inhibitor
ZVAD-fmk opposed potentiation of paclitaxel-induced loss of
mitochondrial membrane potential (
m) and apoptosis by PD98059, but not cytochrome c release. Paclitaxel
treatment induced sustained phosphorylation/activation of MAPK, an
effect prevented by subsequent, but not prior, exposure to PD98059.
Paclitaxel treatment also induced c-Jun N-terminal kinase
phosphorylation, but this effect was enhanced only slightly by
subsequent PD98059 administration. Although paclitaxel alone failed to
induce p38 MAPK activation, subsequent (but not prior) exposure to
PD98059 induced a dramatic increase in p38 MAPK phosphorylation.
Moreover, coadministration of the p38 MAPK inhibitors SB203580 and
SB202190 abrogated the increase in paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis
induced by PD98059. Finally, subsequent PD98059 exposure increased,
whereas prior exposure decreased inhibition of clonogenicity by
paclitaxel. Together, these findings suggest that subsequent exposure
of paclitaxel-treated U937 cells to MEK/MAPK inhibitors induces
perturbations in signaling pathways, particularly the p42/44 MAPK and
p38 MAPK cascades, that lower the threshold for mitochondrial injury
and induction of cell death.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Paclitaxel
(Taxol) is a member of the taxane class of antineoplastic agents and
exhibits activity against both solid tumors as well as hematologic
malignancies (Rowinsky et al., 1992
). In contrast to microtubule
disaggregating agents, paclitaxel induces microtubular stabilization,
leading to arrest of cells in G2M and ultimately,
apoptosis (Bhalla et al., 1993
). The mechanism(s) by which paclitaxel
and related agents trigger the cell death process is not known with
certainty, but has been variously attributed to dysregulation of signal
transduction pathways (Wang et al., 1999a
), induction of cell cycle
perturbations (Shen et al., 1998
), or phosphorylation/inactivation of
the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 (Yamamoto et al., 1999
). Paclitaxel can
also mimic the actions of lipopolysaccharides in stimulating TNF
release (Ding et al., 1990
).
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways provide a
mechanism by which signals are transduced from the cell surface to the
nucleus, leading to activation of genes involved in cell cycle
progression, survival, differentiation, proliferation, and cell death.
Three major subfamilies have been identified: c-Jun N-terminal
kinases/stress-activated protein kinases (JNK/SAPKs), extracellular
signal-related kinases (p42/44 MAPK; ERK1/2), and p38 MAPK. Of these,
JNKs and p38 MAPK are activated by a variety of noxious stimuli,
including inflammatory cytokines, endotoxins, heat shock, alterations
in osmolarity, and genotoxic stresses (Minden and Karin, 1997
). In
contrast, the ERK1/2 module is highly responsive to mitogens and growth
factors and has been implicated in cell proliferation, differentiation,
and cell cycle progression (Cobb, 1999
). Although exceptions exist, the
bulk of evidence suggests that activation of the SAPK and p38 MAPK
cascades promote apoptosis (Cross et al., 2000
), whereas activation of
ERK1/2 exerts a cytoprotective effect (Xia et al., 1995
; Kang et al.,
2000
). Efforts to understand the functional role of the ERK1/2 pathway in various cellular functions have been greatly facilitated by the
recent development of several specific pharmacologic inhibitors of the
MAPK kinase (MEK1/2), including PD98059 and PD184352 (Alessi et al.,
1995
; Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
). The latter compound has attracted
considerable interest in view of its capacity to inhibit the ERK1/2
pathway when administered in vivo (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
).
The relationship between paclitaxel-mediated lethality and the ERK1/2
pathway is unclear. Previous studies have shown that activation of
ERK1/2 is required for entry into and progression through
G2M as well as for the proper functioning of the
mitotic spindle apparatus (Wang et al., 1997)
. Thus, it seems plausible that perturbations in the ERK1/2 cascade might influence the response of cell agents, such as paclitaxel, that trigger
G2M arrest. However, attempts to define the
relationship between the p42/44 MAPK cascade and paclitaxel-related
lethality are complicated by conflicting reports that paclitaxel
exposure can induce either an increase (Huang et al., 1999
), a decrease
(Stone and Chambers, 2000
), or no change (Shtil et al., 1999
) in ERK1/2
activity, depending on the cell type. Lieu et al. (1998)
reported that
administration of the specific MEK/MAPK inhibitor PD98059 before and
concurrently with paclitaxel reduced lethality in the human
myelomonocytic leukemia cell line U937. Such a finding is somewhat
difficult to reconcile with observations from our laboratory that the
macrocyclic lactone bryostatin 1, which on chronic administration
down-regulates protein kinase C (PKC) as well as its downstream target,
MEK/MAPK (Jarvis et al., 1998
), enhances paclitaxel lethality toward
U937 cells in a sequence-dependent manner (Wang et al., 1998
).
Moreover, the actions of bryostatin were mimicked, at least to an
extent, by PD98059. To gain insights into mechanisms responsible for
these phenomena, we have examined the schedule-dependent effects of pharmacologic MEK/MAPK inhibitors on the response of leukemic cells to
paclitaxel, as well as perturbations in signaling events accompanying
these interactions. Our results indicate that subsequent but not prior
exposure of paclitaxel-treated leukemic cells to various MEK/MAPK
inhibitors leads to potentiation of mitochondrial damage, caspase
activation, and apoptosis. Furthermore, such effects are associated
with multiple perturbations in signaling and apoptotic regulatory
pathways, including inhibition of p42/44 MAPK activation, down-regulation of Mcl-1, and, unexpectedly, activation of the p38 MAPK cascade.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells.
The human monocytic leukemic cell line U937, isolated
from the peripheral blood of a patient with diffuse histiocytic
lymphoma, was maintained as described previously (Wang et al., 1998
).
Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with sodium
pyruvate, minimum essential medium essential vitamins,
L-glutamate, penicillin and streptomycin, and 10%
heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone, Logan, UT). They were
maintained in a 37°C, 5% CO2, fully humidified
incubator, passed twice weekly, and prepared for experimental procedures when in log phase growth (cell density
4 × 105 cells/ml). U937 TAM67 cells, which stably
express a c-Jun transactivation binding domain-deficient mutant
protein, were maintained, along with empty-vector control cells, under
selection pressure in medium containing 400 µg/ml G418, as described
previously (Grant et al., 1996
).
Reagents.
Paclitaxel and cycloheximide were purchased from
Sigma (St Louis, MO), stored in light-protected containers at
20°C,
and dissolved in sterile dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma) before use. PD98059, U0126, SB203580 and 202190, and TNF
were purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), and formulated in DMSO as above. Stock solutions were then diluted in RPMI medium to achieve the desired final
concentration. In all cases, final concentrations of DMSO were less
than 0.1% and did not modify responses of cells to paclitaxel. PD184352 was kindly provided by Dr. Judy Sebolt-Leopold (Parke-Davis Pharmaceuticals, Ann Arbor, MI), and was formulated as above. IETD-fmk and ZVAD-fmk were purchased from Enzyme Products, Ltd., (Livermore, CA) and formulated in sterile water before use.
Experimental Format.
As described previously (Wang et al.,
1998
) experimental design was employed. Logarithmically growing cells
were treated with the designated concentration of paclitaxel (generally
250 nM) for 6 h, washed free of drug, and resuspended in medium
containing various concentrations of MEK inhibitors for 15 h.
Alternatively, cells were first exposed to MEK inhibitors for 15 h, washed, and treated with paclitaxel for 6 h, after which they
were washed again, resuspended in drug-free medium, and apoptosis
monitored over the ensuing 15 h. Treatment with paclitaxel alone
induced apoptosis in 27.8 ± 2.8% of cells when given by this
schedule, whereas treatment with MEK inhibitors alone according to this schedule had negligible effects on cell viability or apoptosis. This
experimental format allowed comparisons to be made between the effects
of prior versus subsequent administration of MEK inhibitors on
paclitaxel-induced lethality.
Assessment of Apoptosis.
After drug exposures,
cytocentrifuge preparations were stained with Wright-Giemsa stain and
viewed by light microscopy to evaluate features of cellular
differentiation as well as apoptosis (i.e., cell shrinkage, nuclear
condensation, formation of apoptotic bodies, etc.,) as described
previously (Wang et al., 1998
). For the latter studies, the percentage
of apoptotic cells was determined by evaluating
500 cells/condition in triplicate. We have previously reported that the
incidence of apoptosis as determined by these morphological criteria
correlates very closely with the degree of low molecular weight DNA
fragmentation assayed quantitatively by spectrofluorometry, and
qualitatively with the amount of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation
determined by agarose gel electrophoresis (Wang et al., 1998
).
Determination of Mitochrondrial Membrane
Potential(
m).
Mitochondrial membrane potential
was monitored using 3,3-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (Calbiochem, San
Diego, CA; Wang et al., 1999b
). For each condition, 4 ×105 cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C
in 1 ml of 40 nM 3,3-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide and subsequently
analyzed using a FACScan cytofluorometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose,
CA) with excitation and emission settings of 488 and 525 nm,
respectively. Control experiments documenting the loss of

m were performed by exposing cells to 5 µM carbamoyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (Sigma) (15 min, 37°C), an uncoupling agent that abolishes the mitochondrial
membrane potential.
Preparation of S-100 Fractions and Assessment of Cytochrome
c Release.
U937 cells were harvested after drug
treatment by centrifugation at 600g for 10 min at 4°C. The
cytosolic S-100 fraction was prepared as described previously (Wang et
al., 1999b
), with minor modifications. Cell pellets were washed
once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 5 volumes of buffer A (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM sodium EDTA, 1 mM sodium EGTA, 1 mM
dithiothreotol, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 250 mM
sucrose). After chilling for 30 min on ice, the cells were disrupted by
15 strokes of a glass homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged twice
to remove unbroken cells and nuclei (750g, 10 min, 4°C).
S-100 fractions (supernatants) were then obtained by centrifugation at
100,000g, 60 min at 4°C. All steps were performed on ice
or 4°C. Cytochrome c release into the S-100 fraction for each condition was assessed by Western blot analysis of the resulting fractions as detailed below.
7-AAD.
Assessment of cell viability was determined by
monitoring cellular accumulation of 7-amino actinomycin D (Sigma) by
flow cytometry, as described previously (Philpott et al., 1996
).
Western Analysis.
A minor modification of a method described
previously was employed (Wang et al., 1997a
). After treatment,
whole-cell pellets (1 × 107
cells/condition) were washed twice in PBS, resuspended in 50 µl of
PBS, lysed by the addition of 50 µl of 2× Laemmli buffer (1×, 30 mM
Tris-base, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 2.88 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 10%
glycerol), and briefly sonicated. Homogenates were quantified using
Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Equal amounts
of protein (20 µg) were boiled for 10 min, separated by SDS-PAGE (5%
stacker and 10% resolving) and electroblotted to nitrocellulose. The
blots were stained in 0.1% amido black and destained in 5% acetic
acid to ensure transfer and equal loading. After blocking in PBS-Tween
(PBS-T; 0.05%) and 5% milk for 1 h at 22°C, the blots were
incubated in fresh blocking solution with an appropriate dilution of
primary antibody for 4 h at 22°C. The source and dilution of
antibodies are were as follows: Bcl-2 1:2000, mouse monoclonal, DAKO
(Carpinteria, CA); Bax N20, 1:2000, rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); Bcl-xL 1:500,
rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz; XIAP 1:500, rabbit polyclonal, R & D
Systems (Minneapolis, MN); Mcl-1 1:1000, mouse monoclonal Pharmingen
(San Diego, CA); ERK 1/2 1:1000, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling
Technology (Beverly, MA); phospho-ERK 1/2 (thr202/tyr204) 1:1000,
rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technology; JNK 1:1000, rabbit
polyclonal, Santa Cruz; phospho-JNK, 1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Santa
Cruz; phospho p38 MAPK, 1:1000, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling
Technology; phospho-cdc2 1:1000, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling
Technology; procaspase-3, 1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY); PARP (C-2-10), 1:3000, mouse monoclonal,
BioMol Research Laboratories (Plymouth, MA); cytochrome c
1:500, mouse monoclonal, Pharmingen;
-tubulin 1:2000; Calbiochem;
actin 1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Sigma). Blots were washed three times
for 5 min each in PBS-T and then incubated with a 1:2000 dilution of
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA) for 1 h at 22°C. Blots were again
washed three times for 5 min each in PBS-T and then developed by
enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce).
Determination of Free Bax Levels.
A minor modification of a
technique described previously (Wang et al., 1998
) was employed to
quantify free Bax levels in supernatants immunodepleted of Bcl-2- and
Bcl-xL-Bax heterodimers. After treatment, cells were washed twice with
cold PBS and lysed in 0.2% NP-40 isotonic lysis buffer containing
protease inhibitors (142.5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2% NP-40, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 0.1% aprotinin, and 0.7 µg/ml leupeptin) by incubation for
30 min. Nuclei and unlysed cellular debris were removed by
centrifugation at 15000g for 10 min. Supernatant protein
(200 µg per condition) was incubated with 1 µg monoclonal Bcl-2
antibody (DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) and polyclonal Bcl-xL antibodies
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 4 h at 4°C.
Immunoprecipitates were then captured using Dynabeads (Dynal A.S.,
Oslo, Norway) for another 4 h according to the manufacturer's instructions. The heterodimer-depleted supernatants were then exposed
to anti-Bax polyclonal antibody (1 ìg; Santa Cruz), and the
resulting immunoprecipitates containing free Bax were washed three
times in 0.2% NP-40 lysis buffer. After solubilization in SDS-PAGE gel
electrophoresis sample buffer, electrophoresis of samples was carried
out on 12% SDS-PAGE gels as described above. Free Bax levels were
detected by immunoblotting with primary Bax antibody and quantification
of ECL-developed blots performed using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
Flow Cytometry Cell Cycle Analysis.
After treatment, cells
were pelleted at 500g and resuspended in 70% ethanol. The
cell pellets were incubated on ice for 1 h, and resuspended in 1 ml of cell cycle buffer (0.38 mM sodium citrate, 0.5 mg/ml RNase A, and
0.01 mg/ml propidium iodide; all Sigma) at a concentration of
106 cells/ml. Samples were stored in the dark
before analysis at 4°C (usually within 24 h), and analyzed on a
Becton-Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer (Cambridge, MA) using a
commercially available software program (ModFit LT 2.0; Verity
Software, Topsham, ME) (Wang et al., 1999b
).
Clonogenic Assays and Cloning Studies.
A method described
previously was employed (Wang et al., 1998
). Briefly, after drug
treatment, cells were washed three times in drug-free RPMI medium
containing 5% FCS and cell counts determined using a Coulter counter
(model ZBI; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). After normalization, cells
were plated in 18-mm, 12-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA). Each well
contained 1 ml of supplemented RPMI 1640 medium, 20% FCS, 0.3% Bacto
agar (Difco, Detroit, MI), and 4 × 102
cells/condition. The plates were placed in a fully humidified, 37o, 5% CO2 incubator for
12 days, after which colonies, consisting of groups of
50 cells, were scored with the aid of an Olympus Model CK inverted
microscope. The total number of colonies for each condition was
calculated by multiplying the cell number at the end of the initial
incubation period by the cloning efficiency. Values for each condition
were expressed as a percentage relative to untreated controls.
Statistical Analysis. The significance of differences between experimental conditions was determined using the two-tailed Student's t test.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To assess sequence-dependent interactions between paclitaxel and
PD98059, logarithmically growing U937 cells were treated with 250 nM
paclitaxel for 6 h before a 15-h exposure to PD98059 (40 µM);
alternatively, cells were preincubated with PD98059 for 15 h
before the 6-h paclitaxel exposure, after which cells were washed,
resuspended in fresh medium, and mitochondrial function and apoptosis
monitored over the ensuing 15 h (Fig.
1). With this protocol, paclitaxel by
itself induced apoptosis in 27% of cells, whereas administration of
PD98059 alone exerted negligible effects on cell viability. Whereas
pretreatment with PD98059 reduced the susceptibility of cells to
paclitaxel-induced apoptosis by ~ 20% (P
0.05 versus paclitaxel alone), subsequent exposure of
paclitaxel-treated cells to PD98059 significantly increased the extent
of apoptosis (e.g., by ~65%; P
0.002 versus
paclitaxel alone) (Fig. 1A). The solid bars reflect the minor
contribution of PD98059 by itself to the increase in apoptosis. The
extent of apoptosis in cells exposed to the sequence paclitaxel
PD98059 was also very significantly greater than that observed in cells
exposed to the sequence PD98059
paclitaxel (e.g, 40.3 ± 3.2 versus 21.2 ± 2.8; P
0.001). Lastly, similar
results were obtained when apoptosis was monitored at later intervals
(e.g., 36-48 h after initial drug exposure; data not shown).
|
Parallel results were obtained when loss of mitochondrial membrane
potential (
m; Fig. 1B) or viability,
determined by 7-AAD uptake (Fig. 1C) were examined. Thus, prior
exposure of cells to PD98059, which by itself exerted minimal effects
on mitochondrial function or viability, significantly reduced the
susceptibility of cells to paclitaxel-related lethality, whereas
subsequent exposure enhanced toxicity.
Similar interactions were observed when other MEK inhibitors were
employed. These included U0126, an agent approximately 100-fold more
potent than PD98059 as an inhibitor of the MEK ATP binding site (Favata
et al., 1998
), and PD184352, which inhibits MEK/MAPK in vivo
(Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
). Pretreatment of cells with U0126 (20 µM) or PD184352 (10 µM) protected cells from paclitaxel-mediated mitochondrial damage and apoptosis to an even greater extent than PD98059, whereas subsequent exposure increased paclitaxel-related lethality to a comparable degree (Fig.
2A-C). As in the case of PD98059,
administration of U0126 or PD184352 alone exerted minimal toxicity
(solid bars). Consistent with previous findings, sequential administration of paclitaxel followed by U0126 or PD184352 induced significantly more mitochondrial damage and loss of viability than the
opposite sequences (P
0.005 in each instance).
|
Sequence-dependent effects were also noted when effects on
procaspase-3, PARP degradation, and cytochrome c release
were monitored (Fig. 3). Thus,
pretreatment of cells with PD98059 exerted little effect on, or
slightly reduced, cleavage/activation of procaspase-3 and degradation
of PARP to an 85 kDa species, whereas subsequent exposure of
paclitaxel-treated cells to PD98059 increased the extent of
procaspase-3 and PARP cleavage (Fig. 3). Similarly, prior
exposure to PD98059 reduced, whereas subsequent exposure increased
cytochrome c release in paclitaxel-treated cells (Fig. 3). Comparable results were obtained when U0126 or PD184352 were used (data not shown).
|
In other studies, it was found that shorter PD98059 incubation
intervals (e.g., 6 and 3 h) reduced paclitaxel lethality by 24.7 ± 4.7 and 17.2 ± 3.7%, respectively (data not shown),
values that were significantly less than those obtained for the 15-h preincubation interval (P
0.01 in each case). In
addition, cells exposed simultaneously to paclitaxel and PD98059 for
6 h, washed, and incubated for an additional 15 h in
drug-free medium did not exhibit a significant increase in apoptosis
relative to cells exposed to paclitaxel alone (data not shown). These
findings indicate that a prolonged PD98059 pre-exposure interval is
necessary for maximal attenuation of paclitaxel lethality and that
sustained exposure to PD98059 after paclitaxel treatment is required to potentiate cell death.
To investigate the hierarchy of apoptotic events triggered by exposure
of cells to paclitaxel followed by PD98059, cells were first treated
with paclitaxel as above and subsequently incubated with PD98059 in the
presence or absence of the broad caspase inhibitor ZVAD-fmk (Fig.
4). Coexposure to ZVAD-fmk essentially
abrogated the increase in morphological evidence of apoptosis (Fig. 4A) and loss of 
m (Fig. 4B) in
paclitaxel-treated cells that accompanied subsequent PD98059 treatment.
In contrast, ZVAD-fmk failed to prevent the increase in
paclitaxel-induced cytochrome c release induced by PD98059,
although it did antagonize degradation of procaspase-3 (Fig. 4B). These
findings suggest that increased cytochrome c release
represents a primary consequence of combined drug exposure, whereas the
loss of 
m stems, at least in part, from
caspase activation.
|
As shown in Fig. 5A, subsequent treatment
with PD98059 (40 µM) increased apoptosis in cells exposed to a range
of paclitaxel concentrations (e.g., 50-250 nM), although effects were
somewhat more pronounced at the upper end of this range. Potentiation
of paclitaxel lethality became apparent at a PD98059 concentration of
30 µM and was more even more marked at concentrations of 40 to 50 µM (Fig. 5B). Lastly, in view of evidence that paclitaxel lethality
may be related to activation of the TNF pathway (Ding et al., 1990
),
cells were treated with paclitaxel followed by PD98059 in the presence
or absence of the caspase-8 inhibitor IETD-fmk (Fig. 5C). Whereas
apoptosis induced by TNF + cycloheximide was abrogated by IETD-fmk, no
protection was observed in cells exposed to the paclitaxel/PD98059
combination. Similar results were obtained in U937 cells ectopically
expressing the caspase 8 inhibitor CrmA (data not shown). These
findings argue against the possibility that PD98059 enhances paclitaxel
lethality by promoting TNF release.
|
Sequence-dependent effects of PD98059 were then examined in relation to
MAPK activation. Induction of phosphorylated MAPK (reflected by
increased expression of phospho-ERK on Western blots) was noted 2 h after initial paclitaxel exposure and increased further at the 3 and
6 h intervals (Fig. 6A). In cells
first exposed to PD98059, washed, and subsequently treated with
paclitaxel, MAPK activation was very apparent 3 h after the end of
the paclitaxel exposure (Fig. 6B). In fact, activation was even more
pronounced than at the end of the 6-h exposure interval. However, when
cells were first exposed to paclitaxel, washed, and subsequently
treated with PD98059, induction of phospho-ERK at this (as well as at later intervals; Fig. 10) was essentially abrogated (Fig. 6C). Thus,
subsequent, but not prior, treatment of cells with PD98059 opposed
paclitaxel-induced activation of the MEK/MAPK pathway.
|
Previous studies have related paclitaxel lethality to activation of
p34cdc2 (Shen et al., 1998
). To determine whether
subsequent exposure to PD98059 might increase paclitaxel-mediated
p34cdc2 activation, Western analysis was carried
out using an antibody that recognizes p34cdc2
phosphorylated on the tyr15 residue (Fig.
7A). Consistent with previous findings
(Shen et al., 1998
), treatment of cells with paclitaxel alone reduced
levels of tyr15
phospho-p34cdc2. However, sequential exposure of
cells to paclitaxel followed by PD98059 did not result in further
dephosphorylation of p34cdc2. For all conditions,
levels of total p34cdc2 protein were equivalent
(data not shown). These findings argue against the possibility that
PD98059 increases paclitaxel lethality by enhancing
p34cdc2 activation. In separate studies, the
impact of PD98059 on paclitaxel-associated perturbations in the mitotic
index was examined (Fig. 7B). Although PD by itself did not modify the
percentage of mitotic cells (or the G2M fraction;
data not shown), it significantly reduced the mitotic index in cells
exposed to paclitaxel. It should be noted that the magnitude of this
decline approximated the observed increase in apoptosis.
|
MAPK has recently been implicated in modulating phosphorylation of the
Bcl-2 protein (Deng et al., 2000
). Consistent with previous reports
(Yamamoto et al., 1999
), exposure of cells to paclitaxel resulted in
the appearance of a slowly migrating, putatively phosphorylated Bcl-2
species (Fig. 8). However, expression of this species was not altered in cells subsequently exposed to PD98059,
despite the observed potentiation of apoptosis. In addition, MAPK
inhibition has been reported to reduce expression of the antiapoptotic
Mcl-1 protein in human ML-1 cells and to increase their susceptibility
to the antimitotic agent VP-16 (Townsend et al., 1998
). However, in
contrast to the effects of VP-16 in ML-1 cells, Mcl-1 levels declined
in U937 cells treated with paclitaxel, and this phenomenon was even
more pronounced in cells exposed to paclitaxel + PD98059 (Fig. 8). PD
treatment did not modify expression or mobility of the antiapoptotic
proteins Bcl-xL or XIAP in paclitaxel-treated
U937 cells. Lastly, PD98059 did not alter total Bax levels in
paclitaxel-treated cells. Moreover, in cell extracts immunodepleted of
Bcl-2/Bax and Bcl-xL/Bax heterodimers, levels of free Bax were
diminished after paclitaxel-treatment, consistent with previous reports
(Wang et al., 1998
), but this effect was not enhanced by subsequent
exposure of cells to PD98059 (Fig. 8). Together, these findings argue
against the possibility that PD98059 enhances paclitaxel-mediated
lethality by altering Bcl-2 phosphorylation status or free Bax levels,
although the contribution of reduced Mcl-1 expression cannot be
excluded.
|
The impact of sequential exposure of cells to paclitaxel and PD98059 on
the stress-related JNK and p38 pathways was examined next (Fig.
9). Treatment of cells with paclitaxel
alone (250 nM) resulted in increased expression of phospho-JNK that
persisted for 6 h after paclitaxel exposure, and this effect was
increased slightly by subsequent exposure of cells to PD98059 (Fig.
9A). As shown in Fig. 9B, paclitaxel exposure increased phospho-JNK expression in a dose-dependent manner, and treatment with PD98059 enhanced JNK activation modestly at each paclitaxel dose. Similar effects were noted at other time points throughout the 15-h
postpaclitaxel exposure interval (data not shown). PD98059 also
increased paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in cells expressing the c-Jun
transactivation domain-deficient mutant protein TAM67 (data not shown).
However, although paclitaxel by itself failed to increase expression of
phospho-p38 MAPK (Fig. 9B, bottom), subsequent exposure of cells to
PD98059 resulted in a very striking increase in p38 MAPK activation. As
shown in Fig. 9B, lower, this effect was also observed in cells exposed to 150 nM but only marginally at 50 nM paclitaxel. Furthermore, activation of p38 MAPK was not observed in cells treated with PD98059
before paclitaxel (data not shown). To assess the functional significance of enhanced p38 MAPK activation in cells exposed to
paclitaxel followed by PD98059, experiments were performed in the
presence of the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, and caspase activation and
apoptosis monitored (Fig. 8, C and D). It can be seen that both the
potentiation of paclitaxel-induced procaspase-3 degradation (Fig. 9C)
and apoptotic morphology (Fig. 9D) by PD98059 were essentially
abrogated by SB203580. Similarly, the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB202190 also
attenuated paclitaxel/PD98059-induced apoptosis (Fig. 9D). Together,
these findings indicate that antagonism of paclitaxel-induced MAPK
phosphorylation by the MEK/MAPK inhibitor PD98059 in U937 cells is
accompanied by a reciprocal increase in p38 MAPK activation and raise
the possibility that this phenomenon contributes to potentiation of
paclitaxel-induced lethality.
|
The temporal relationship between p42/44 and p38 MAPK activation in
cells exposed to paclitaxel ± PD98059 was examined further (Fig.
10). As noted previously (Fig. 6),
p42/44 MAPK activation was noted 3 h after paclitaxel treatment;
although the extent of activation subsequently declined, it was
maintained over the 15-h exposure interval. However, administration of
PD98059 effectively abrogated p42/44 MAPK activation throughout this
period. Phosphorylated p38 MAPK was not observed in paclitaxel-treated
cells at the 3-h interval, but could be very faintly discerned at later
time points. However, in paclitaxel-treated cells subsequently exposed
to PD98059, activation of p38 MAPK was clearly present at 3 h,
very apparent at 6 h, and even more pronounced at the end of the
incubation interval. Thus, in paclitaxel-treated cells, inhibition of
sustained activation of p42/44 MAPK was accompanied by a reciprocal
increase in expression of phosphorylated p38 MAPK.
|
To investigate the biological consequences of PD98059-mediated
potentiation of paclitaxel-induced apoptosis by PD98059, clonogenic assays were performed (Fig. 11).
PD98059 by itself did not significantly reduce colony formation. While
pretreatment with PD98059 only modestly protected clonogenic cells from
paclitaxel-associated lethality, this effect was nevertheless
significant (P
0.05). Moreover, subsequent exposure
of paclitaxel-pretreated cells to PD98059 resulted in a significant
loss of colony forming potential (P
0.01 versus
paclitaxel alone). In addition, the reduction in colony formation for
the sequence paclitaxel
PD98059 was very significantly greater than
that for the sequence PD98059
paclitaxel (P
0.005). These findings indicate that subsequent exposure of
paclitaxel-pretreated cells to the MEK/MAPK inhibitor PD98059 enhances
lethality in self-renewing leukemic cells, and raises the possibility
that an increase in apoptosis may be involved in this phenomenon.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present studies demonstrate that in U937 cells, subsequent,
but not prior exposure of paclitaxel-treated cells to pharmacologic MEK/MAPK inhibitors potentiates mitochondrial damage and apoptosis. The
relationship between p42/44 MAPK activity and paclitaxel exposure is
complex and may be cell-type-specific. Thus, treatment with paclitaxel
has led to an increase (Huang et al., 1999
) or no change in MCF-7 cells
(Shtil et al., 1999
), or a decline in MAPK activity in KB-3 carcinoma
cells (Stone and Chambers, 2000
). Furthermore, PD98059 exerts either no
effect on paclitaxel toxicity (Huang et al., 1999
), or attenuates its
lethal actions (Lieu et al., 1998
). In the latter study, pretreatment
combined with concurrent (24-h) exposure of U937 cells to PD98059 (80 µM) decreased the paclitaxel cytotoxicity (Lieu et al., 1998
).
Consistent with these findings, we also found that pretreatment of U937
cells with PD98059 (e.g., 40 µM), or other pharmacologic MEK
inhibitors (e.g., U0126 and PD184352), attenuated paclitaxel-mediated
mitochondrial damage (i.e., cytochrome c release and loss of

m), caspase activation, and apoptosis.
However, in contrast to the results of Lieu et al., subsequent exposure
of paclitaxel-treated U937 cells to multiple MEK/MAPK inhibitors
significantly increased paclitaxel-mediated lethality. The latter
findings are consistent with those of MacKeigan et al., who recently
demonstrated that coadministration of PD98059 or U0126 with paclitaxel
for 24 h led to a marked increase in cytotoxicity in lung (H157)
and ovarian (OVCA194) cancer cells (MacKeigan et al., 2000
). Together,
these findings suggest that scheduling and cell type may play a key
role in determining the net effect of MEK/MAPK inhibition on paclitaxel toxicity.
Activation of MEK/MAPK is generally, although not invariably,
associated with cytoprotective actions (Kang et al., 2000
). For
example, the relative outputs of the JNK and ERK pathways regulate
survival in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells subjected to growth factor
deprivation (Xia et al., 1995
). In HL-60 cells, potentiation of
ara-C-mediated lethality (e.g., by the PKC down-regulator bryostatin)
has been attributed to inhibition of MAPK rather than JNK activation
(Jarvis et al., 1998
). Analogously, subsequent (but not prior) exposure
of paclitaxel-treated U937 cells to bryostatin, like PD98059,
potentiated apoptosis (Wang et al., 1998
). These findings raise the
possibility that exposure of leukemic cells to cytotoxic agents elicits
a cytoprotective MAPK response and that interruption of this process
(e.g., either upstream at the level of PKC or downstream at the level
of MEK/MAPK) promotes lethality. The observation that only subsequent
exposure of paclitaxel-treated cells to MEK inhibitors prevented MAPK
activation suggests that the actions of the latter agents are
relatively short-lived. It is worth noting that in HL-60 cells,
paclitaxel exposure failed to induce MAPK activation, and PD98059 did
not modify paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis (Blagosklonny et al., 1999
).
Aside from the fact that the latter study employed a simultaneous
rather than sequential schedule, it is possible that MEK inhibitors
only enhance paclitaxel lethality in cells in which MAPK is activated.
It should be noted that the failure of simultaneous (6-h)
administration of PD98059 to potentiate paclitaxel-induced apoptosis
suggests that other factors (e.g., cell cycle-related) are involved in
this phenomenon.
The present results indicate that the proximal cause of enhanced
apoptosis in cells exposed to paclitaxel and MEK inhibitors is
cytochrome c release. Although loss of the

m represents the central executioner of
apoptosis in some cells (Marchetti et al., 1996
), evidence that 1)
cytochrome c release often precedes loss of

m (Goldstein et al., 2000
) and 2) caspase
activation may occur in the absence of 
m
changes (Li et al., 2000
) suggests that the cytochrome c
redistribution represents the primary cell death trigger. Consistent
with this concept, ZVAD-fmk blocked enhanced caspase activation and
apoptosis in paclitaxel-treated cells subsequently exposed to PD98059,
but not cytochrome c release. These findings argue that MEK
inhibitors lower the threshold for cytochrome c release in
paclitaxel-pretreated cells and that loss of

m represents a consequence of caspase activation.
In view of evidence linking paclitaxel toxicity to cell cycle
dysregulation, it seems plausible that MEK/MAPK inhibitors might promote the latter action. For example, exposure of cells to paclitaxel induces dephosphorylation of the cyclin-dependent kinase
p34cdc2 (Shen et al., 1998
), unscheduled
activation of which is associated with apoptosis (Meikrantz et al.,
1994
). Furthermore, MAPK has been implicated in the
G2-M transition, normal microtubular function, and the mitotic spindle checkpoint (Wang et al., 1997b
; Cross and
Smythe, 1998
). However, subsequent exposure of paclitaxel-treated cells
to PD98059 did not lead to further dephosphorylation/activation of
p34cdc2, although it did reduce the mitotic index
while reciprocally increasing apoptosis. These findings raise the
possibility that disruption of the mitotic spindle assembly apparatus
by MEK/MAPK inhibitors may amplify the lethal consequences of
microtubule stabilization induced by prior paclitaxel treatment.
Conversely, interference with the G2-M transition
(e.g., by prior MEK inhibitor exposure) might attenuate the lethal
effects of subsequently administered paclitaxel. This concept is
compatible with recent findings indicating that MEK inhibitors (e.g.,
PD98059 and U0126) block the transition from G2
to mitosis induced by nocodazole (Hayne et al., 2000
).
Interruption of signaling cascades may influence apoptosis by
modulating the expression of apoptotic regulatory proteins. In this
regard, paclitaxel-induced cell death has been associated with Bcl-2
phosphorylation (Blagosklonny et al., 1997
; Yamamoto et al., 1999
).
Conversely, in IL-3-dependent murine myeloid cells subjected to growth
factor deprivation, Bcl-2 phosphorylation exerted an antiapoptotic
effect that was blocked by PD98059 (Deng et al., 2000
). However,
although exposure of cells to paclitaxel led, as reported previously
(Blagosklonny et al., 1999
), to the appearance of a phosphorylated
Bcl-2 species, this effect was not appreciably modified by PD98059
treatment. Nevertheless, the possibility that PD98059 induces
qualitative alterations in Bcl-2 phosphorylation (Hu et al.,
1998
) cannot be excluded. Interestingly, exposure of U937 cells
to PD98059 did induce down-regulation of the antiapoptotic protein
Mcl-1, consistent with findings in human ML-1 leukemia cells treated
with VP-16 (Townsend et al., 1998
). In this report, cotreatment with
PD98059 blocked up-regulation of Mcl-1 induced by VP-16. In contrast,
paclitaxel by itself reduced Mcl-1 expression in U937 cells, an effect
that was enhanced by subsequent exposure to PD98059. Thus, the present
findings raise the possibility that down-regulation of Mcl-1 by MEK
inhibitors contributes to enhanced paclitaxel toxicity.
Earlier studies have implicated JNK activation in paclitaxel-mediated
lethality (Lee et al., 1998
), a phenomenon linked to Bcl-2
phosphorylation/inactivation (Yamamoto et al., 1999
). Moreover, the
concept that perturbations in stress and cytoprotective signaling pathways contribute to the lethal actions of other microtubule-active agents (e.g., vinblastine) has been proposed (Fan et al., 2000a
,b
). However, the observations that subsequent exposure of
paclitaxel-treated cells to PD98059 resulted in only a modest increase
in phospho-JNK expression, and the ability of PD98059 to increase
paclitaxel toxicity in TAM67-expressing cells argues against a primary
role for JNK in enhanced cell killing. The relationship between p38 MAPK activation and paclitaxel lethality, as in the case of the other
MAPKs, seems to vary with cell type. For example, paclitaxel activated
p38 MAPK in MCF-7 cells (Huang et al.,1999
), reduced basal activity in
KB-3 carcinoma cells (Stone and Chambers, 2000
), and exerted no effect
in HL-60 cells (Blagosklonny et al., 1999
). However, in contrast to JNK
activation, exposure of paclitaxel-pretreated U937 cells
to PD98059 produced a very dramatic increase in p38 MAPK activation.
Furthermore, the ability of pharmacologic p38 MAPK inhibitors (e.g.,
SB203580 and SB202190) to block potentiation of apoptosis suggests a
functional role for this MAPK in the cell death process. One model that
might explain these findings, summarized in Fig.
12, is that treatment of U937 cells
with paclitaxel elicits a stress-related JNK and a cytoprotective
p42/44 MAPK response, the relative outputs of which determine the
extent of apoptosis. Subsequent exposure of paclitaxel-treated cells to
MEK/MAPK inhibitors opposes p42/44 MAPK activation, triggering a
reciprocal induction of p38 MAPK. The shift away from cytoprotective
and toward stress-associated MAPK signaling may contribute to
potentiation of cell death. However, the finding that simultaneous
exposure of cells to PD98059 and paclitaxel did not lead to enhanced
lethality strongly suggests that other factors (e.g., cytokinetic) are
also involved in this phenomenon, as discussed previously. Finally, the
possibility that interactions between paclitaxel and MEK/MAPK
inhibitors involve perturbations in both signal transduction and cell
cycle events cannot be excluded.
|
In summary, the present findings demonstrate that subsequent but not
prior exposure of paclitaxel-treated U937 to pharmacologic MEK/MAPK
inhibitors results in a significant increase in mitochondrial injury,
and cell death. Furthermore, these events are associated with
inhibition of paclitaxel-induced p42/44 MAPK activation, down-regulation of Mcl-1, and a dramatic increase in p38 MAPK activation. In view of the development of MEK inhibitors with in vivo
activity (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
), these studies could have
implications for future attempts to use such agents to enhance the
activity of paclitaxel and possibly other taxanes. Accordingly, efforts
to extend these findings to other malignant hematopoietic and
nonhematopoietic cell types, including those that, unlike U937 cells,
express wild-type -53, are underway.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 13, 2000; Accepted March 21, 2001
This work was supported by awards CA83705 and CA63753 and DK528825 from the National Institutes of Health, BC98-0148 from the Department of Defense, and award 6630-01 from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America.
Dr. Steven Grant, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Virginia, MCV Station Box 230, Richmond, VA 23298. E-mail: stgrant{at}hsc.vcu.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; FCS, fetal calf serum; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; 7-AAD, 7-amino actinomycin D; PBS-T, phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20; NP-40, Nonidet P-40.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-induced apoptosis by interruption of protein kinase C signaling.
Mol Pharmacol
54:
844-856
-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells that overexpress Bcl-2.
Mol Pharmacol
52:
1000-1009