![]() |
|
|
Vol. 60, Issue 3, 427-431, September 2001
Department of Molecular Endocrinology, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytochromes P450 (P450s) are involved in the oxidative
metabolism of a plethora of structurally unrelated compounds, including therapeutic drugs. Two orphan members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, the pregnane X receptor (PXR; NR1I2) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR; NR1I3) have been implicated in this phenomenon. In the present study, we examined the transcriptional regulation of the human CYP2B6 gene. In primary cultures
of human hepatocytes, CYP2B6 was highly inducible by a
number of compounds known to be human PXR ligands, including rifampicin
and hyperforin. PXR was shown to be capable of activating the
phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) region of the
CYP2B6 gene, a 51-base-pair enhancer element that
mediates induction of CYP2B6 expression by CAR. The two
nuclear receptor-binding motifs within the PBREM effectively bound PXR
as a heterodimer with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor
(NR2B1). Taken together, these observations demonstrate that the
CYP2B6 gene is directly regulated by PXR and further establish this receptor as a key regulator of drug-metabolizing P450s.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytochromes P450 (P450s) are a
superfamily of heme-thiolate-containing proteins involved in the
oxidative metabolism of a diverse range of compounds, including steroid
hormones, bile acids, fatty acids, and prostaglandins. In addition,
many P450 enzymes participate in the conversion of carcinogens,
environmental pollutants, and drugs to more polar metabolites, thereby
facilitating their excretion and preventing the accumulation of these
potentially harmful compounds (Nelson et al., 1996
).
For many years, it has been understood that xenobiotic compounds can
induce the expression of certain P450 genes, notably members of the
CYP1A, CYP2B, CYP3A, and
CYP4A subfamilies (Waxman, 1999
). This adaptive response
increases the organism's ability to metabolize and ultimately
eliminate toxic and carcinogenic compounds. Whereas induction of
CYP1A genes by aromatic hydrocarbons and CYP4A
subfamily members by peroxisome proliferators are known to be mediated
by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and peroxisome proliferator activated
receptor
(NR1C1), respectively, the molecular mechanisms by which
structurally dissimilar compounds induce CYP2B and
CYP3A genes remained obscure (Denison and Whitlock, 1995
). Recently, a number of laboratories identified two orphan members of the
nuclear receptor family, the pregnane X receptor (PXR; NR1I2) and
constitutive androstane receptor (CAR; NR1I3), as xenobiotic-responsive transcription factors (Bertilsson et al., 1998
; Blumberg et al., 1998
;
Honkakoski et al., 1998
; Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al.,
1998
; Moore et al., 2000b
; Tzameli et al., 2000
)
Human PXR (also known as SXR or PAR) binds and is activated by many
known CYP3A4 inducers, including the macrocyclic antibiotic rifampicin, the antimycotic clotrimazole, the barbiturate phenobarbital (PB), and the putative antidepressant component of St. John's wort,
hyperforin (Bertilsson et al., 1998
; Blumberg et al., 1998
; Lehmann et
al., 1998
; Jones et al., 2000
; Moore et al., 2000a
). PXR
interacts with its cognate response elements in the 5'-flanking regions
of CYP3A genes as a heterodimer with the 9-cis
retinoic acid receptor
(RXR
; NR2B1). Typically, these elements
contain two copies of the AG(G/T)TCA hexad organized as a direct repeat with a three-nucleotide spacer (DR3) or an everted repeat (ER) separated by 6 bp (ER6) (Bertilsson et al., 1998
; Blumberg et al.,
1998
; Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al., 1998
; Goodwin et al.,
1999
). Further compelling evidence for the role of PXR in the induction
of CYP3A genes is provided by experiments performed in mice
harboring a homozygous disruption of the pxr gene. Thus, mice lacking functional PXR fail to up-regulate Cyp3a11
expression in response to the classic rodent CYP3A inducers
pregnenolone 16
-carbonitrile and dexamethasone (Xie et al.,
2000a
; Staudinger et al., 2001
). Notably, induction of
Cyp3a11 expression by PB was intact in the PXR-null mice
(Xie et al., 2000b
; Staudinger et al., 2001
).
In addition to PXR, CAR also plays a central role in the regulation of
xenobiotic-inducible P450 genes, although the biology of this receptor
is very different from that of PXR. CAR exhibits a high level of
constitutive transcriptional activity and can activate expression of
reporter gene constructs in the absence of exogenously added ligand
(Baes et al., 1994
; Choi et al., 1997
). The androstane metabolites
androstanol and androstenol act as inverse agonists for the mouse and,
to a lesser extent, human CAR, whereas the potent Cyp2b10
inducer 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene is a high-affinity
mouse CAR agonist (Forman et al., 1998
; Moore et al., 2000b
;
Tzameli et al., 2000
). As with PXR, there seems to be a species
divergence in CAR pharmacology (Jones et al., 2000
; Moore et al.,
2000b
).
Elegant studies by Negishi and coworkers have demonstrated that
induction of CYP2B subfamily members by PB and PB-like
inducers is mediated by CAR (Honkakoski et al., 1998
; Kawamoto
et al., 1999
). In untreated liver, CAR resides in the cytoplasm of the hepatocyte. However, exposure of the cell to PB or PB-like inducers promotes the rapid translocation of CAR to the nucleus, where it
trans-activates expression of its target genes. Importantly, this process is uncoupled by the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid,
suggesting that the PB-induced nuclear translocation of CAR is a
phosphorylation-sensitive event (Kawamoto et al., 1999
). Although PB
does not seem to interact directly with CAR (Moore et al.,
2000b
), targeted disruption of the mouse car gene
results in total ablation of Cyp2b10 inducibility by both PB
and 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene (Wei et al., 2000
).
After translocating to the nucleus, CAR interacts with a conserved
51-bp enhancer element located ~2 kilobase pairs upstream of the
CYP2B1, CYP2B2, CYP2B6, and
Cyp2b10 transcription initiation sites (Trottier et al.,
1995
; Honkakoski et al., 1998
; Sueyoshi et al., 1999
; Smirlis et
al., 2001
). These regions, termed phenobarbital-responsive units (PBRU)
or phenobarbital-responsive enhancer modules (PBREM), contain two DR4
elements (NR1 and NR2) that act as high-affinity binding sites for CAR
and its obligate heterodimerization partner RXR
. Notably, PXR is
also reported to trans-activate DR4 elements; moreover, PXR
and CAR bind and activate common response elements in the human
CYP3A4 and rodent CYP3A23, CYP2B1, and
Cyp2b10 genes, suggesting that interplay between these two
receptors is likely to be a central theme in the regulation of
xenobiotic-inducible P450s (Blumberg et al., 1998
; Sueyoshi et al.,
1999
; Xie et al., 2000b
; Geick et al., 2001
; Smirlis et al.,
2001
; B. Goodwin, E. Hodgson, and C. Liddle, submitted).
In this study, we examined the role of PXR in the regulation of the
human CYP2B6 gene. CYP2B6 is involved in the metabolism of a
number of clinically important drugs (Ekins and Wrighton 1999
);
moreover, its expression is reported to be induced by compounds that
are PXR ligands, including rifampicin, PB, troglitazone, and
dexamethasone (Strom et al., 1996
; Chang et al., 1997
; Sahi et al.,
2000
; Gerbal-Chaloin et al., 2001
). We show that PXR directly regulates
CYP2B6 expression.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Rifampicin, dexamethasone, sodium phenobarbital, and charcoal-stripped, delipidated FBS were obtained from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis MO). Cell culture reagents, unless otherwise stated, were provided by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Hyperforin was purchased from Apin Chemicals Ltd. (Abingdon, Oxon, UK). SR12813 was synthesized in house.
Primary Culture of Human Hepatocytes and Northern Blot
Analysis.
Primary human hepatocytes were obtained from Dr. Stephen
Strom (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) and maintained exactly as described elsewhere (Moore et al., 2000a
). At 48 h after
isolation, cells were treated for a further 48 h with various
inducers that were added to the culture medium as 1000× stocks in
DMSO. Sodium phenobarbital was dissolved directly into the medium.
Control cultures received vehicle (0.1% DMSO) alone. Total RNA was
isolated using a commercially available reagent (TriZOL; Invitrogen).
CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 mRNA levels were examined by Northern blot analysis using standard techniques. Blots were sequentially hybridized with
CYP2B6 [bases 3-659 of the published cDNA; GenBank accession number
AF182277), CYP3A4 (bases 790 to 1322 of the published cDNA; GenBank
accession number M18907), and
-actin (CLONTECH Laboratories Inc.,
Palo Alto, CA) cDNA probes.
Preparation of CYP2B6 PBREM Reporter Gene
Constructs.
Luciferase reporter gene constructs were prepared by
annealing oligonucleotides corresponding to the wild-type and mutant CYP2B6 PBREM (Fig. 2A) before insertion into the
BglII site of pGL3-tk-Luc, which contains bases
105 to +51
of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter linked to a
luciferase reporter gene.
Transient Transfection Assays.
Analysis of PXR- and
CAR-dependent trans-activation of the CYP2B6
PBREM reporter gene constructs was performed in a human liver-derived
cell line, HuH7. Cells (20,000 per well) were inoculated into a 96-well
plate in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/Ham's F12 media nutrient
mixture supplemented with 10% charcoal/dextran-treated FBS (HyClone
Laboratories Inc., Logan, UT) and transfected 24 h later with
LipofectAMINE Plus reagent (Invitrogen). Transfection mixes contained 8 ng of luciferase reporter gene construct, 2 ng of human CAR or PXR
expression vectors, pSG5-hCAR (Moore et al., 2000b
) and
pSG5-
ATG-hPXR (Lehmann et al., 1998
), 8 ng of p
-actin-SPAP, and 52 ng pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla,
CA). Transfection was allowed to proceed for 3 h. Cells were
maintained for a further 24 h in the presence of drug (added as a
1000× stock in DMSO) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle/Ham's F12 media
nutrient mixture supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated,
charcoal-stripped, delipidated FBS. An aliquot of medium was withdrawn
for SPAP assay and the cells lysed before luciferase determination.
Luciferase activities were normalized to SPAP expression.
Electrophoretic Mobility-Shift Assay.
Electrophoretic
mobility-shift assay (EMSA) was performed exactly as described
elsewhere (Goodwin et al., 1999
). In vitro translated human RXR
,
CAR, and PXR were prepared using a TNT rabbit
reticulocyte system (Promega, Madison, WI). Binding reactions were
preincubated on ice for 10 min before the addition of
32P-end-labeled probe corresponding to the NR1
and NR2 motifs. After a further 20 min on ice, samples were resolved on
a pre-electrophoresed 5% acrylamide gel in 0.25× Tris/borate/EDTA
buffer (22.5 mM Tris-borate, 0.5 mM EDTA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induction of CYP2B6 Expression by PXR Ligands.
To examine whether PXR regulates CYP2B6 expression, human
hepatocytes were treated with a panel of known PXR ligands (Fig. 1A). In line with earlier observations,
rifampicin (~15-fold) and PB (~50-fold) effectively induced CYP2B6
mRNA levels (Strom et al., 1996
; Chang et al., 1997
; Gervot et al.,
1999
; Gerbal-Chaloin et al., 2001
). In addition, treatment of human
hepatocytes with dexamethasone or the high-affinity PXR ligands SR12813
and hyperforin (Jones et al., 2000
; Moore et al., 2000a
) resulted in
the induction of CYP2B6 expression (~6-fold, 5-fold, and 4-fold,
respectively). In parallel with CYP2B6 mRNA levels, expression of
CYP3A4 was also examined. As expected, CYP3A4 mRNA levels were strongly
induced by rifampicin (13-fold), SR12813 (~5-fold), hyperforin
(~3.5-fold), dexamethasone (7-fold), and PB (~13-fold) (Fig. 1B).
Similarly, rifampicin, SR12813, hyperforin, and dexamethasone induced
CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 expression. However, the
PB-mediated induction of CYP2B6 (~50-fold) expression was
significantly higher than that of CYP3A4 (~13-fold), in
line with the important role of CAR in the regulation of
CYP2B6 (Sueyoshi et al., 1999
).
|
PXR Activates the CYP2B6 PBREM.
Transcriptional
activation of the CYP2B6 gene by CAR is mediated by the
51-bp PBREM. This region is located 1.7 kilobase pairs upstream of the
CYP2B6 transcription initiation site and contains two
imperfect DR4 elements, designated NR1 and NR2 (Fig.
2A) (Sueyoshi et al., 1999
). Importantly,
PXR-RXR
heterodimers are reported to be capable of binding and
trans-activating DR4 elements (Blumberg et al., 1998
). Taken
together, these observations suggested that induction of
CYP2B6 expression by compounds that activate PXR may be
mediated by the PBREM region. Thus, we examined the ability of PXR to
activate reporter gene constructs harboring the CYP2B6 PBREM
linked to a minimal herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter and
luciferase reporter. Chimeric CYP2B6-PBREM reporter gene
constructs containing wild-type and mutated DR4 motifs (Fig. 2A) were
transiently transfected into a liver-derived cell line (HuH7) and the
ability of rifampicin, a human PXR ligand, to activate expression of
these constructs was determined. In the absence of exogenously
expressed PXR, there was no detectable induction of reporter gene
expression by rifampicin (Fig. 2B). Cotransfection of the wild-type
CYP2B6-PBREM construct (pGL3-CYP2B6-PBREM) with a human PXR
expression vector resulted in an ~2-fold increase in reporter gene
activity. Treatment of transfected cells with rifampicin (10 µM)
elicited a further 3-fold induction of luciferase expression (Fig. 2B).
The relative contribution of the NR1 and NR2 DR4 motifs to the PXR
response was examined by mutating the hexad half-sites in one or both
of these elements. Although mutation of the NR1 site
(pGL3-CYP2B6-PBREMmutNR1) completely abrogated PXR-dependent
activation, the pGL3-CYP2B6-PBREMmutNR2 construct, which contains a
mutated NR2 element, retained some responsiveness to PXR. As expected,
mutation of both the NR1 and NR2 sites (pGL3-CYP2B6-PBREMmut1 + 2)
destroyed the PXR response (Fig. 2B). These data suggest that the NR1
motif is quantitatively the more important element to the PXR response.
|
The NR1 and NR2 Motifs Bind PXR-RXR
Heterodimers.
The
ability of the NR1 and NR2 sites to bind PXR was examined by EMSA. Both
the NR1 and NR2 elements strongly complexed PXR-RXR
heterodimers
(Fig. 3A). In close agreement with the
cell-based reporter gene assays described above, competition binding
studies demonstrated that the NR1 site bound PXR-RXR
with higher
affinity than the NR2 motif (Fig. 3B), confirming that this site is the predominant PXR response element within the PBREM. As reported previously (Sueyoshi et al., 1999
), CAR-RXR
heterodimers bound both
NR1 and NR2 (Fig. 3A). In similarity to the PXR-RXR
binding profile,
the NR1 site interacted with the CAR-RXR
heteromer with significantly higher affinity than the NR2 element (Fig. 3B). The
mutated derivatives of the NR1 and NR2 sites used in the transient transfection studies failed to compete for either PXR-RXR
or CAR-RXR
binding.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of earlier studies suggested that the human
CYP2B6 gene might be regulated in a PXR-dependent manner
(Ekins and Wrighton 1999
, and references therein). In this report, we
show that CYP2B6 is regulated directly by PXR. In primary
cultures of human hepatocytes, the human PXR ligands rifampicin,
hyperforin, SR12813, dexamethasone, and PB effectively induced
expression of both CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, a
well-documented PXR target gene. Trans-activation of
CYP2B6 by PXR was shown to be mediated by the PBREM region
of the gene, a 51-bp enhancer module that controls induction of
CYP2B6 by CAR (Sueyoshi et al., 1999
).
The PBREM/PBRU is highly conserved among PB-inducible CYP2B
subfamily members, namely CYP2B1, CYP2B2,
CYP2B6, and Cyp2b10 (Sueyoshi et al., 1999
);
moreover, similar to CYP2B6, both the mouse
Cyp2b10 PBREM and rat CYP2B1 PBRU are activated
by PXR (Xie et al., 2000b
; Smirlis et al., 2001
). The
CYP2B6 PBREM contains two DR4 elements that are capable of
binding both PXR-RXR
and CAR-RXR
heteromers. CAR was originally
reported to bind a DR5 element in the RAR
2 promoter; subsequently,
however, CAR-mediated trans-activation through DR3, DR4, and
ER6 elements has been documented (Baes et al., 1994
; Choi et al., 1997
;
Honkakoski et al., 1998
; Sueyoshi et al., 1999
; Xie et al.,
2000
; Smirlis et al., 2001
; B. Goodwin, E. Hodgson, and C. Liddle,
submitted). It is now apparent that these configurations of nuclear
receptor half-sites are also capable of binding PXR-RXR
heterodimers
(Blumberg et al., 1998
; Kliewer et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al., 1998
;
Goodwin et al., 1999
; Sueyoshi et al., 1999
; Xie et al., 2000b
;
Geick et al., 2001
; Smirlis et al., 2001
). Taken together, these
observations demonstrate that CAR and PXR are capable of regulating
common genes through the same cis-acting elements,
suggesting that cross talk between these two signaling pathways is an
important factor in mounting an appropriate response to a xenobiotic challenge.
Although rifampicin and PB induced CYP3A4 to a similar
extent (~13-fold), CYP2B6 was substantially more
responsive to PB (~50-fold) than rifampicin (~15-fold). Thus,
although both CAR and PXR directly regulate CYP2B6
expression, CAR seems to assume a dominant role in the PB-mediated
induction of this gene. It is possible that the arrangement of the
nuclear receptor binding motifs within the CYP2B6 PBREM
provides an optimal platform for CAR-mediated transactivation. In
addition to promoting nuclear translocation of CAR, PB is an effective
activator of human PXR (Lehmann et al., 1998
; Goodwin et al., 1999
;
Jones et al., 2000
). We have previously shown that CAR and PXR share
common ligands (Moore et al., 2000b
); therefore, it is likely
that certain xenobiotics, including PB, are capable of inducing P450
expression through multiple signaling pathways. The existence of
multiple xenobiotic receptors with distinct but overlapping ligand
specificities increases the organism's ability to detect and respond
to a potentially harmful substance.
In summary, we have shown that the human CYP2B6 gene is directly regulated by PXR. These results provide evidence for a functional redundancy between the nuclear receptors PXR and CAR in the protective response to xenobiotic challenge in humans. Importantly, our findings extend the range of potential drug interactions caused by compounds that activate PXR to include CYP2B6 substrates. This knowledge can be used to understand more fully the metabolism of drugs currently on the market and to design safer drugs for the future.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 18, 2001; Accepted June 4, 2001
Dr. Steven A. Kliewer, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Room V118, Five Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: sak15922{at}glaxowellcome.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
P450, cytochrome P450, PXR;
pregnane X receptor, CAR;
constitutive androstane receptor, RXR
;
9-cis retinoic acid receptor
, DRn;
direct repeat with n-bp spacer, bp, base pair(s);
ER6, everted repeat with 6-base-pair spacer;
PB, phenobarbital;
PBRU, phenobarbital-responsive unit;
PBREM, phenobarbital-responsive enhancer
module;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
SPAP, secreted placental alkaline phosphatase;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility-shift assay.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kwara, M. Lartey, K. W. Sagoe, F. Xexemeku, E. Kenu, J. Oliver-Commey, V. Boima, A. Sagoe, I. Boamah, D. J. Greenblatt, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz When Co-administered With Rifampin in TB/HIV Co-infected Patients: Pharmacogenetic Effect of CYP2B6 Variation J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 48(9): 1032 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Surapureddi, R. Rana, J. K. Reddy, and J. A. Goldstein Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 6 Mediates the Synergistic Activation of Human Cytochrome P-450 2C9 by the Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor-4{alpha} Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 913 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekins, V. Kholodovych, N. Ai, M. Sinz, J. Gal, L. Gera, W. J. Welsh, K. Bachmann, and S. Mani Computational Discovery of Novel Low Micromolar Human Pregnane X Receptor Antagonists Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 662 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Tompkins, T. L. Sit, and A. D. Wallace Unique Transcription Start Sites and Distinct Promoter Regions Differentiate the Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) Isoforms PXR 1 and PXR 2 Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 923 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Takagi, M. Nakajima, T. Mohri, and T. Yokoi Post-transcriptional Regulation of Human Pregnane X Receptor by Micro-RNA Affects the Expression of Cytochrome P450 3A4 J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9674 - 9680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Johnson, A. Owen, N. Plant, P. G. Bray, and S. A. Ward Drug-Regulated Expression of Plasmodium falciparum P-Glycoprotein Homologue 1: a Putative Role for Nuclear Receptors Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2008; 52(4): 1438 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Healan-Greenberg, J. F. Waring, D. J. Kempf, E. A. G. Blomme, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim A Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitor Is a Novel Functional Inhibitor of Human Pregnane X Receptor Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 500 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ning, S. Dial, Y. Sun, J. Wang, J. Yang, and L. Guo Systematic and Simultaneous Gene Profiling of 84 Drug-Metabolizing Genes in Primary Human Hepatocytes J Biomol Screen, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 194 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekins, C. Chang, S. Mani, M. D. Krasowski, E. J. Reschly, M. Iyer, V. Kholodovych, N. Ai, W. J. Welsh, M. Sinz, et al. Human Pregnane X Receptor Antagonists and Agonists Define Molecular Requirements for Different Binding Sites Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2007; 72(3): 592 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cerveny, L. Svecova, E. Anzenbacherova, R. Vrzal, F. Staud, Z. Dvorak, J. Ulrichova, P. Anzenbacher, and P. Pavek Valproic Acid Induces CYP3A4 and MDR1 Gene Expression by Activation of Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Pregnane X Receptor Pathways Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1032 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Urquhart, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim Nuclear Receptors and the Regulation of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters: Implications for Interindividual Variability in Response to Drugs J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Meneses-Lorente, C. Pattison, C. Guyomard, C. Chesne, R. Heavens, A. P. Watt, and B. Sohal Utility of Long-Term Cultured Human Hepatocytes as an in Vitro Model for Cytochrome P450 Induction Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Faucette, T.-C. Zhang, R. Moore, T. Sueyoshi, C. J. Omiecinski, E. L. LeCluyse, M. Negishi, and H. Wang Relative Activation of Human Pregnane X Receptor versus Constitutive Androstane Receptor Defines Distinct Classes of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 Inducers J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 72 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Moore, S. Kato, W. Xie, D. J. Mangelsdorf, D. R. Schmidt, R. Xiao, and S. A. Kliewer International Union of Pharmacology. LXII. The NR1H and NR1I Receptors: Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Pregnene X Receptor, Farnesoid X Receptor {alpha}, Farnesoid X Receptor beta, Liver X Receptor {alpha}, Liver X Receptor beta, and Vitamin D Receptor Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 742 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Itoh, M. Nakajima, E. Higashi, R. Yoshida, K. Nagata, Y. Yamazoe, and T. Yokoi Induction of Human CYP2A6 Is Mediated by the Pregnane X Receptor with Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Coactivator 1{alpha} J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 693 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sakai, H. Iwata, E.-Y. Kim, O. Tsydenova, N. Miyazaki, E. A. Petrov, V. B. Batoev, and S. Tanabe Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR) as a Potential Sensing Biomarker of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Aquatic Mammal: Molecular Characterization, Expression Level, and Ligand Profiling in Baikal Seal (Pusa sibirica) Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2006; 94(1): 57 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jung, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and U. A. Meyer Pregnane X Receptor Is a Target of Farnesoid X Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19081 - 19091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Meijerman, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H.M. Schellens Herb-Drug Interactions in Oncology: Focus on Mechanisms of Induction Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 742 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Faucette, T. Sueyoshi, C. M. Smith, M. Negishi, E. L. LeCluyse, and H. Wang Differential Regulation of Hepatic CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 Genes by Constitutive Androstane Receptor but Not Pregnane X Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1200 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aouabdi, G. Gibson, and N. Plant TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF THE PXR GENE: IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A FUNCTIONAL PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR {alpha} BINDING SITE WITHIN THE PROXIMAL PROMOTER OF PXR Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 138 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Orans, D. G. Teotico, and M. R. Redinbo The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor Pregnane X Receptor: Recent Insights and New Challenges Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 19(12): 2891 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ding and J. L. Staudinger The Ratio of Constitutive Androstane Receptor to Pregnane X Receptor Determines the Activity of Guggulsterone against the Cyp2b10 Promoter J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2005; 314(1): 120 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zukunft, T. Lang, T. Richter, K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, A. K. Nussler, K. Klein, M. Schwab, M. Eichelbaum, and U. M. Zanger A Natural CYP2B6 TATA Box Polymorphism (-82T-> C) Leading to Enhanced Transcription and Relocation of the Transcriptional Start Site Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2005; 67(5): 1772 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekins, E. Kirillov, E. A. Rakhmatulin, and T. Nikolskaya A NOVEL METHOD FOR VISUALIZING NUCLEAR HORMONE RECEPTOR NETWORKS RELEVANT TO DRUG METABOLISM Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2005; 33(3): 474 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rencurel, A. Stenhouse, S. A. Hawley, T. Friedberg, D. G. Hardie, C. Sutherland, and C. R. Wolf AMP-activated Protein Kinase Mediates Phenobarbital Induction of CYP2B Gene Expression in Hepatocytes and a Newly Derived Human Hepatoma Cell Line J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4367 - 4373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ding and J. L. Staudinger Induction of Drug Metabolism by Forskolin: The Role of the Pregnane X Receptor and the Protein Kinase A Signal Transduction Pathway J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2005; 312(2): 849 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sahi, R. H. Stern, M. A. Milad, K. A. Rose, G. Gibson, X. Zheng, L. Stilgenbauer, N. Sadagopan, S. Jolley, D. Gilbert, et al. EFFECTS OF AVASIMIBE ON CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 EX |