![]() |
|
|
Vol. 60, Issue 3, 611-619, September 2001
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glucocorticoids regulate the rat glutathione
S-transferase A2 (GSTA2) gene in a
biphasic manner in cultured hepatocytes that repress gene expression at
low concentration (10-100 nM) but induce gene expression at high
concentration (>1 µM). High concentrations of the glucocorticoid
receptor (GR) antagonist RU38486 (5-10 µM) also induced the
expression of GSTA2. These effects were reproduced in
HepG2 cells transfected with a luciferase reporter containing 1.6 kilobase pairs of 5'-flanking sequence of GSTA2 and
expression plasmids for either GR, pregnane X receptor (PXR) or a
combination of both. Dexamethasone t-butylacetate (1 µM t-Bu-DEX) repressed gene expression between 60 to
75% when only GR was expressed. When PXR was expressed, both basal and
t-Bu-DEX-dependent gene expression was increased over
2-fold, respectively. Biphasic regulation of gene expression was
observed over a broad range of t-Bu-DEX concentrations
when expression plasmids for both receptors were cotransfected. Other
steroids of the pregnane class induced GSTA2 expression
as expected for a PXR-dependent process. Because no canonical
responsive element for the PXR-RXR
heterodimer was observed in the
5'-flanking region of the construct, deletion analysis was used to
identify a pregnane responsive region between base pairs
700 and
683; this 20-bp region contains the antioxidant response element
(ARE). When the ARE sequence was mutated, basal, t-butylhydroquinone- and
17
-hydroxypregnenolone-inducible expression were all lost. These
results suggest that PXR interacts with factors binding to the ARE to
elicit the pregnane inductive response for GSTA2.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
glutathione S-transferase A2 (GSTA2) gene encodes
a protein that is a member of a superfamily of dimeric enzymes of
subunit molecular mass between 20 and 30 kDa (Ketterer 1986
;
Mannervik and Danielson, 1988
; Hayes and Pulford, 1995
) These proteins
play a major role in the detoxification of xenobiotic chemicals by catalyzing the conjugation of glutathione with the electrophilic centers of these toxicants, thus preventing protein or nucleic acid
alkylation reactions. In addition, GSTA2 serves as an intracellular binding protein for nonsubstrate ligands, which includes steroids of
the pregnane class (Listowsky, 1993
) and bile acids including lithocholic acid (Takikawa and Kaplowitz, 1988
).
The transcriptional activation of the rat GSTA2 subunit gene
by xenobiotic compounds has been well characterized by Pickett and
coworkers (Rushmore et al., 1990
; Rushmore et al., 1991
; Nguyen and
Pickett, 1992
). Two functionally independent responsive elements, the
Ah-receptor response element (AhRE, Rushmore et
al., 1990
) and the antioxidant response element (ARE, Rushmore et al.,
1991
), are required for the induction of this protein subunit by
xenobiotic compounds. Polycyclic and polychlorinated aromatic compounds
induce gene expression via the Ah receptor, which binds to
the AhRE (Whitlock et al., 1996
). The metabolites of
aromatic compounds, phenolic antioxidants, phorbol esters, and hydrogen
peroxide cause transcriptional activation, apparently through action of
the transcription factor Nrf-2 and its heterodimerization partner, a
member of the small maf family, which binds to the ARE (Itoh et al.,
1999
).
Glucocorticoids have been shown to modulate transcription of genes by
several different mechanisms. Classically, glucocorticoids act as
ligands for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to either enhance or
repress expression of target genes (Beato, 1989
). The simplest
interaction of this transcription factor is through binding to a
canonical sequence, TGTYCT, often found as an imperfect palindrome separated by three base pairs. This interaction is characterized by a
concentration dependence for the synthetic glucocorticoid DEX similar
to the known Kd value of GR (less than
10
7 M) and by inhibition of its action by the
GR antagonist RU38486.
Kliewer et al. (1998)
described another member of the nuclear receptor
superfamily, the pregnane X receptor (PXR), that is activated by
steroids of the pregnane class and cholestatic bile acids, such as
lithocholic acid and 3 keto-lithocholic acid (Staudinger et al., 2001
).
In addition to these endogenous ligands, this receptor is activated by
xenobiotic compounds such as imidazole derivatives and macrolide
antibiotics (e.g., rifampicin). In contrast to GR, PXR binds DEX with
much lower affinity and the responses to DEX are observed at
concentrations greater than 1 × 10
7 M. The ligand dependence is also different from the classical glucocorticoid response; for example, RU38486 serves as an agonist for
PXR, rather than an antagonist of GR. PXR binds DNA as an obligate
heterodimer with RXR
. In rodents, this heterodimeric complex
preferentially recognizes a direct repeat of the nonsteroidal nuclear
receptor half-site separated by a three-nucleotide spacer (Kliewer et
al., 1998
). A DR3 binding sequence of AGTTCAnnnAGTTCA as observed in
rat CYP3A23 (Huss et al., 1998
; Kliewer et al., 1998
;
Quattrochi et al., 1998
) binds the PXR and is thought to account for
the "nonclassical" glucocorticoid induction of rat CYP3A23 protein
described by Guzelian and coworkers (Schuetz et al., 1984
; Schuetz and
Guzelian, 1984
; Kocarek et al., 1994
).
Our previous work revealed inconsistencies in the effects of
glucocorticoids on the expression of GSTA2 in different
systems. In isolated rat hepatocytes, DEX at 1 × 10
6 M induced GSTA2 expression (Xiao
et al., 1995
). However, transient transfection experiments with HepG2
cells, expression of a reporter construct containing 1.62 kb of 5'
flanking region of rat GSTA2 was suppressed by DEX at 1 × 10
5 M (Falkner et al., 1998
). The current
report is based on the hypothesis that low concentrations of DEX
suppress GSTA2 gene expression via a GR-dependent mechanism,
whereas high concentrations of DEX induce expression via a
PXR-dependent mechanism. This report describes the biphasic
concentration-dependence of the effects of DEX on the expression of
GSTA2 in primary adult rat hepatocytes. Furthermore, each
phase of this response is reproduced in transient transfection
experiments in HepG2 cells by cotransfection of expression plasmids for
either GR or PXR.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
pCMV-
was obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla,
CA). The reporter construct p2XDEX-LUC and pRSVGR, the expression
vector for the human GR, were a kind gift from Michael Mathis (LSU
Medical Center, Shreveport, LA). The expression vector pPXR for the
mouse PXR was generously provided by Steven Kliewer (Glaxo
Wellcome Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC).
The expression vector for human RXR
was generously provided by Dan
Noonan (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY).
-hydroxypregnenolone, and 6
-methyl-17
-hydroxy progesterone acetate (Depo-Provera)] were purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). RU38486 was obtained from Roussel Uclaf
(Romainville, FRANCE). Pregnenolone was obtained from Mann Research
Laboratories, (New York, NY). t-Bu-DEX was purchased from
Research Plus, Inc. (Bayonne, NJ). Chlorophenol
red-
-D-galactopyranoside was purchased from
Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN). All other
reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and were either
American Chemical Society or molecular biology grade.
Primary Hepatocyte Cell Culture
Hepatocytes were routinely
prepared from male adult Sprague-Dawley rats (180-250 g;
[Hsd:Sprague-Dawley SD] from Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN)
by in situ liver collagenase perfusion as described previously (Xiao et
al., 1995
). Cell viability (>85-90%) was determined by trypan blue
exclusion. Hepatocytes were suspended (approx.1 × 106
cells/ml) in arginine-free Eagle's minimum essential medium
supplemented with L-ornithine and
insulin-transferrin-sodium selenite solution. Cells (3 ml) were seeded
on 60-mm tissue culture dishes that had been precoated with Matrigel.
Once plated, the cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified
atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. The media were changed 2 and 24 h after plating. At 24 h, inducing agents, either DEX
or RU38486, were added in DMSO. Control cells received equivalent
amounts of solvent alone. At the desired time, media were removed from
the dishes by aspiration, the cells were washed twice with Dulbecco's
phosphate-buffered saline, and mRNA were isolated as described
previously (Xiao et al., 1995
).
Analysis of mRNA Levels.
Total RNA was isolated by
modification of the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987)
. Northern
blot experiments were performed after size-fractionation of the
denatured RNA (25 µg) on formaldehyde-containing 1% agarose gels and
transfer of the RNAs to Zetaprobe membranes (Life Science Research,
Hercules, CA) by capillary transfer. GSTA2 mRNA was detected
using a 290-bp fragment of the plasmid pGTB38 kindly provided by Cecil
Pickett (Schering Plough, Kenilworth, NJ). Cytochrome P450 3A1 mRNA was
detected using a synthetic oligonucleotide termed ON-1 by Waxman et al.
(1992)
[5'-ACCACATTTCTGACGAATTCAGCAGAACTC-3']. This probe has a
single nucleotide mismatch with the sequence reported for
CYP3A23, the major DEX-inducible cytochrome P450 in the rat
(Huss et al., 1998
). CYP2B1/2 mRNA was detected using a 1.7-kb
EcoRI fragment of the plasmid pSP450, which contains the
entire coding sequence for CYP2B1 obtained from Milton
Adesnick (New York University Medical Center, New York, NY). These
nucleic acid probes were labeled with [32P]dCTP
using the random primer labeling procedure. Hybridization was carried
out at 43°C overnight in 0.25 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. As a
control,
-actin mRNA levels were measured using a mouse cytoskeletal
-actin (Xiao et al., 1995
).
Plasmid Constructs.
Luciferase constructs containing either
0.164 or 1.651 kb of the 5'-flanking region, p0.164YaLUC and
p1.62YaLUC, respectively, of the rat GSTA2 have been
described previously (Falkner et al., 1998
). Deletion constructs where
produced by either sequential subcloning of PCR products or
introduction of ds-oligonucleotides into p0.164YaLUC. To prepare a
reporter gene with the GSTA2 promoter containing a
polycloning site, primers BMYaUNI
(5'-AGACT-AAGCTTGGGTTGTAAAAGAGATACTGA) and 164BGLTOP
(5'-AGACT-AGATCT-CTTGTCAGCCCCTCCCCCCA-3') were used with p1.6YaCAT
as a template to produce a 252-bp fragment containing 164 bp of the
5'-flanking region of the GSTA2 gene. PCR was performed in a
Thermolyne Amplitron II thermal cycler (Barnstead/Thermolyne, Dubuque,
IA) with 2 mM Mg2+. PCR products were generated
through 20 cycles of the following steps: denaturing temperature,
94°C for 0.5 min; annealing temperature, 50°C for 1 min; and
elongation temperature, 72°C for 1 min. The PCR fragments were
initially subcloned into pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and
using the BglII and HindIII restriction sites, the recovered PCR fragment was subcloned into the
pGL2-basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI) to form
p0.164bYaLUC. Other fragments of the 5'-flanking region were generated
using the primers listed in Table 1,
which were subcloned into the pCR2.1 recovery vector. These fragments
were subcloned into p0.164bYaLUC using either restriction sites in the
5'-flanking regions of the primers or unique restriction sites in the
polycloning region of pCR2.1. No differences have been observed in the
function of either p0.164YaLUC or p0.164bYaLUC.
|
722 to
682 bp
was constucted in a method identical with p0.164YaLUC (Falkner et al.,
1998
703 to
683 was
produced by annealing oligonucleotides OKF82
(5'-TAATGGTGACAAAGCAACTT-3') and OKF83 (5'-TAAAGTTGCTTTGTCACCAT-3') and
subcloning a single copy of the ds-oligonucleotide into the
NdeI site of p0.164YaLUC. Likewise, the
722 to
682 ARE
mutant construct was produced by subcloning a single copy of the
annealed oligonucleotides OKF 80 (5'-TAAAGTTGCTTTGTCCCCATTAGCAATGCCATTTCCAAGCTC-3') and
OKF81(5'-TAGA-GCTTGGAAATGGCATTGCTAATGGGGACAAAGCAACTT-3') into the
NdeI site of p0.164YaLUC.
Cells and Culture Conditions. The human hepatoblastoma cell line HepG2 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with antibiotic/antimycotics, nonessential amino acids and 10% fetal bovine serum. The hepatoma cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% carbon dioxide atmosphere and were subcultured every 2 to 3 days.
Transfection of Hepatoblastoma Cells.
HepG2 cells were
plated into 12-well tissue culture plates and transfected using the
calcium phosphate method of Gorman et al. (1982)
at 40% cell
confluence. DNA-CaCl2-HEPES buffered precipitates were added to the cells and, after 24 h, the media were changed. The cells were subsequently treated with various agents as 500× concentrated stocks in DMSO; controls received an equivalent volume of
DMSO alone. After an additional 24 h, the cell protein was harvested with 100 µl of cell lysis buffer (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) according to manufacturer's instructions and subjected to a single
freeze/thawing event. All cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of
pCMV-
as a transfection control. Routinely, 125 ng of receptor
expression plasmids (pPXR or pRSVGR) and 1 µg of the various
GSTA2 reporter constructs, including p1.62YaLUC, were added
to each well.
Assays of
-Galactosidase and Luciferase Activity.
Luciferase activity of cell extracts was determined using the
luciferase assay system from Promega (Madison, WI) in a Berthold Model
LB9501 Lumat luminometer (Wallac, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). For the
-galactosidase assays, cell extracts were incubated with chlorophenol red
-galactopyranoside at 37°C for 30 min. Activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 574 nm with a µQuant microplate spectrophotometer (Biotek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT).
Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed using a Student's t test.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Varying Concentrations of Glucocorticoids Cause Biphasic Changes in
GSTA2 Expression in Cultured Rat Hepatocytes.
The
glucocorticoid DEX decreases expression of the GSTA2 mRNA in cultured
rat hepatocytes at concentrations up to 1 × 10
7 M (Fig. 1, A
and B). However, at concentrations above 1 × 10
6 M, an increase in mRNA levels was observed,
demonstrating two phases of response to DEX for the GSTA2
gene. Because induction occurred with a concentration-dependence
consistent with a PXR-dependent process, we tested the effects of DEX
on the expression of CYP3A23 and CYP2B1/2 genes
as shown in Fig. 1C. The effects of glucocorticoids between 1 × 10
11 and 1 × 10
7
M for CYP2B1/2 expression was similar to that observed with
GSTA2 expression. Therefore, within the concentration range
associated with activation of the GR (up to 1 × 10
7 M), DEX exerts a concentration-dependent
repression of both GSTA2 and CYP2B1/2 message
levels. In our hands, basal expression of CYP3A23 in
cultured rat hepatocytes cultured for 24 to 48 h was very low.
|
6 M, a 2- to 3-fold increase in mRNA levels was observed for GSTA2 and
CYP2B1/2 (Fig. 1, B and C), whereas a 10- to 11-fold
increase was observed in the expression of the CYP3A23 gene.
In addition, a 2- to 3-fold induction of GSTA2 protein and enzyme
activity was observed upon treatment of primary adult rat hepatocytes
with concentrations of DEX at or above 1 × 10
6 M (data not shown). There was a striking
similarity of both the shape and magnitude of the
concentration-response curves for GSTA2 and
CYP2B1/2. These results confirm those published by Kocarek et al. (1994)
|
The GR Antagonist RU38486 Induces GSTA2 mRNA Levels in Cultured Rat
Hepatocytes.
Fig. 2 shows the
concentration-dependent effects of RU38486 on GSTA2 mRNA.
GSTA2 mRNA is induced approximately 3-fold by treatment of the
hepatocytes with high concentrations (10 µM) of RU38486. Although
RU38486 is a potent antagonist of GR at 5-10 µM, this compound is an
agonist for the PXR (Kliewer et al., 1998
) and, at these
concentrations, has been shown to induce both CYP3A23 and CYP2B1/2
(Kocarek et al., 1994
). Thus, the ability of RU38486 to serve as an
agonist for GSTA2 induction correlates well with its known function as
a PXR ligand. The results shown in Fig. 2 for GSTA2
are nearly identical with the changes in CYP2B1/2 mRNA when primary
adult rat hepatocytes were treated with RU38486 (Kocarek et al., 1994
).
The data shown in Fig. 2 are reproducible and a statistical analysis of
the effect of RU38486 on GSTA2 mRNA is shown in Table 2. The similarity
of these concentration-response curves suggests that DEX and RU38486
regulate GSTA2 and CYP2B1/2 through two different
mechanisms, probably due to action of GR and PXR.
|
Cotransfection of GR and PXR Accounts for the Biphasic Regulation
of a GSTA2 Reporter Construct by
t-Bu-DEX.
To test the hypothesis that the biphasic
regulation of GSTA2 was mediated by both a classical
GR-dependent mechanism and a nonclassical (PXR-dependent) mechanism,
experiments were carried out in HepG2 cells transiently transfected
with various plasmids. This system allows one to manipulate expression
of individual receptors and to reproduce the results seen in primary
cultures of rat hepatocytes. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected
with p1.62YaLUC, a luciferase reporter gene containing 1.62 kb of the 5'-flanking region of GSTA2, and expression vectors for
either the human GR and/or murine PXR in the absence or presence of
1 × 10
5, 1 × 10
7, and 1 × 10
10
M t-Bu-DEX. Because the Kd value
of GR for DEX is approximately 10 to 50 nM, we expected little effect
of the lowest concentration of t-Bu-DEX (1 × 10
10 M) and a maximal glucocorticoid effect at
1 × 10
7 M. Likewise, at 1 × 10
7 M t-Bu-DEX or less, we
anticipated little effect on the PXR. However, we anticipated that mPXR
would be activated at the highest concentration of t-Bu-DEX
used in this experiment, 1 × 10
5 M. As
shown in Fig. 3, t-Bu-DEX at
any concentration had no effect on the expression of the
GSTA2 reporter in the absence of coexpressed receptors. This
suggests that the endogenous expression of these receptors is not
sufficiently high in HepG2 cells to modulate reporter gene expression
in transfection experiments. Consistent with our earlier results
(Falkner et al., 1998
) when GR was cotransfected with 1.65YaLUC in
HepG2 cells and the cells were treated with t-Bu-DEX,
negative regulation of this reporter was observed.
|
in basal expression. When
charcoal treated serum was utilized, PXR still had an effect on basal
expression (data not shown). Upon addition of 1 × 10
5 M t-Bu-DEX, there was a further
65% increase in expression; no statistically significant difference in
expression was seen at 1 × 10
7 or 1 × 10
10 M t-Bu-DEX. These results
demonstrate a role for PXR in t-Bu-DEX-dependent induction
of GSTA2 expression.
Intermediate effects were observed when both GR and PXR were
cotransfected (Fig. 3). The basal rate was increased, but negative regulation by concentrations of t-Bu-DEX which activate GR
was noted. This effect was reversed to control levels of expression with 1 × 10
5 M t-Bu-DEX.
Because GR is activated by either t-Bu-DEX (Fig. 3) or DEX
(Falkner et al., 1998
5 M must be caused by its action as
a ligand for PXR. These results demonstrate that the biphasic response
of GSTA2 gene expression is caused by t-Bu-DEX
acting through two independent nuclear receptor-mediated mechanisms.
An extended concentration-response with t-Bu-DEX was
performed in this reporter gene system in the presence of either GR
alone or GR plus PXR (Fig. 4). As
anticipated, when GR alone was cotransfected, treatment with
t-Bu-DEX caused a simple monotonic decline in expression of
p1.62YaLUC. In the presence of both GR and PXR, more complex biphasic
regulation of expression was observed. Although we normalized the basal
activity for cells expressing either GR or PXR plus GR, basal
expression in the presence of PXR was increased approximately 2-fold.
There was negative regulation up to 1 × 10
7 M t-Bu-DEX consistent with this
compound mediated its effects acting through the GR. At higher
concentrations up to 1 × 10
5 M, a 2- to
2.5-fold induction of expression over basal expression of this gene was
observed, again consistent with the involvement of PXR. We observed
that 1 × 10
4M t-Bu-DEX was
toxic to HepG2 cells as observed by decreases in cell number and
viability, which probably accounts for the decline in expression
observed at 1 × 10
4 M
t-Bu-DEX.
|
10) tested than the control value. Although
this response was variable, it was observed both in transient
transfection experiments with HepG2 cells and in isolated rat
hepatocytes. Several groups (Huss and Kasper, 2000
and PXR, are under glucocorticoid control. Thus, the
elevation of basal expression of GSTA2 reporter expression
in cells transfected with both PXR and GR may reflect increased
expression of RXR
which affects basal expression.
Over-Expression of PXR and RXR
Increases Basal Expression of a
GSTA2 Reporter Gene.
Because PXR heterodimerizes
with RXR
to bind to its responsive element (Kliewer et al., 1998
),
we tested the effects of cotransfection of an expression vector for
RXR
on expression of p1.62YaLUC. As is shown in Fig.
5, cotransfection of a expression vector
for RXR
had no effect on luciferase expression on either basal or t-Bu-DEX treated cells. As anticipated, cotransfection of
PXR caused an increase in basal level expression of approximately 1.5-fold and a significant increase in expression was observed in cells
treated with 1 × 10
5 M
t-Bu-DEX. When both RXR
and PXR were coexpressed, the
basal expression rate was markedly increased, but
t-Bu-DEX-dependent increases in expression were not observed
suggesting that PXR-RXR
apparently interact to increase basal
expression of GSTA2 reporter constructs. In cells
cotransfected with both receptors, the level of increase of basal
expression was greater than the t-Bu-DEX-dependent expression when PXR alone was cotransfected. The loss of
ligand-inducibility suggests that corepressors may be limiting when
RXR
and PXR are overexpressed.
|
PXR-Ligands Induce Expression of a GSTA2 Reporter
Gene.
To establish which steroids may regulate this gene at
concentrations 1 × 10
5 M, we performed
the reporter gene expression assay using known activators/ligands for
PXR as shown in Fig. 6. The best ligands were the pregnanes pregnenolone (2.5-fold) and
17
-hydroxypregnenolone (2.4-fold). These pregnanes were the best
naturally occurring ligands for PXR in the induction of expression of a
DR3 reporter in CV-1 cells. The ligands t-Bu-DEX (1.7-fold),
RU 38486 (1.6-fold), progesterone (1.5-fold), cortisol (1.5-fold),
deoxycortisone (1.4-fold), and 6
-methyl-17
-hydroxy progesterone
acetate (1.4-fold) also caused significant induction in enzyme
activity. In contrast, DEX (1.1-fold) and hydrocortisone (0.87-fold)
did not significantly induce reporter gene expression via PXR. The
steroids that caused a significant induction in activity have all been
shown to be ligands for the PXR when tested as
trans-activators of a DR3 response element-reporter system
in transient transfection assays with CV-1 cells (Kliewer et al.,
1998
). There is, however, a difference in potency between the
responses, in that t-Bu-DEX is a much better inducer of
DR3-mediated reporters in CV-1 cells than the naturally-occurring pregnanes, 17
-hydroxypregnenolone and pregnenolone, where as the
reverse is true for the t-Bu-DEX-dependent regulation of
GSTA2 in HepG2 cells (Fig. 6).
|
Deletion Analysis of the 5'-Flanking Region of GSTA2
to Define the Location of the PXR-Responsive Element.
Because the
5'-flanking region of the GSTA2 gene does not contain
sequences with identity to or high similarity to the canonical DR3
binding sequence for the murine PXR, we undertook a deletion strategy
to identify the element through which the PXR-dependent induction
process was acting. As seen in Fig. 7,
our initial deletion construct that included the area of 5'-flanking
region between
914 and
638 bp relative to the transcription start
site was responsive to 17
-hydroxypregnenolone-dependent induction.
This construct contains the elements that are responsible for induction of this gene by xenobiotic compounds, namely the AhRE and
ARE responsive elements. Further deletion analysis identified the region between base pairs
703 and
683 as responsible for the pregnane-dependent induction of the gene. Constructs that did not
contain this sequence were not pregnane-responsive. The ARE is located
between base
703 and
683; thus, our results show PXR acting within
the same 20-bp region containing the ARE.
|
Mutation of the GSTA2 ARE in a pARE-LUC Reporter
Oblates Induction of Expression by PXR Ligands and
t-Butylhydroquinone.
To further define the element
through which the pregnane effect occurs, we used a plasmid that
contains a single base pair mutation in the ARE core sequence
(GTGACnnnGC to GGGACnnnGC) that has been previously shown to
cause a loss of basal level activation and prevent
t-butylhydroquinone-dependent induction (Rushmore et al.,
1991
). As is shown in Fig. 8, both
t-butylhydroquinone (an ARE-activating chemical) and
17
-hydroxy-pregnenolone (a PXR-activating chemical) induced
expression of this wild-type reporter construct apparently in an
additive manner. As expected from the work of Rushmore et al. (1991)
,
the reporter with the mutated ARE had much lower basal activity. The
mutated reporter construct was also not responsive to treatment with
either 17
-hydroxypregnenolone or t-butylhydroquinone
which suggests that the mutated base pair is critical for either
inductive process (i.e., activation via either Nrf2 or PXR).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results presented show that glucocorticoids such as DEX are
capable of regulating the expression of the rat GSTA2 gene in a
biphasic manner. These results resolve the apparent conflict between
our earlier published work (Xiao et al., 1995
) in which glucocorticoids
at 1 × 10
6 M induced expression of GSTA2
message in primary rat hepatocytes, whereas identical concentrations of
the synthetic corticosteroid repressed expression (Falkner et al.,
1998
) of reporter constructs transiently transfected into HepG2 cells
in a GR-dependent process. Our results show that the regulation of
expression in primary hepatocytes is biphasic and that at
concentrations of DEX greater than 10
7M gene
expression of GSTA2 is induced. However, at lower
concentrations of DEX, there is a suppression of gene activation
consistent with the involvement of GR. Our studies using transient
transfection of reporter plasmids in HepG2 cells showed that neither
the negative GR-dependent nor the positive PXR-dependent DEX effects
are observed if the respective receptors are not cotransfected.
Negative regulation was observed only when GR was cotransfected and
likewise, positive regulation was only observed when PXR was cotransfected.
The prototypical model of gene induction at high concentrations of DEX
has been well documented for expression of CYP3A23 in the
rat. Studies by Guzelian and coworkers (Schuetz et al., 1984
; Schuetz
and Guzelian, 1984
) have shown that this gene is induced by
supraphysiological concentrations of glucocorticoids at the
transcriptional level. Subsequent studies (Huss et al., 1998
;
Quattrochi et al., 1998
) have shown that the response is mediated
through a DR3 element that can bind a PXR/RXR
heterodimer. In
addition, other compounds that have been shown to be ligands for the
PXR also activate this response element (Kliewer et al., 1998
). These
compounds include other pregnanes, RU38486, the macrolide antibiotic
rifampicin, and imidazole derivatives. Recently, Staudinger et al.
(2001)
have shown that cholestatic bile acids, such as lithocholic acid
and 3-ketolithocholic acid, are excellent ligands for PXR and suggest a
role for this receptor in bile acid synthesis and excretion. The
ligand-mediated activation of this receptor usually occurs only at
high, supraphysiological concentrations of these ligands, consistent
with a role for this receptor in detoxication, a reaction catalyzed by CYP3A23.
GSTA2 is a member of a superfamily of proteins that catalyzes the
reaction between the sulfhydryl group of the tripeptide glutathione and
electronegative centers found in lipophilic molecules (Ketterer, 1986
;
Mannervik and Danielson, 1988
). In addition to its role as an active
catalyst, this abundant protein also acts as a binding protein for
steroids (Listowsky, 1993
) and cholestatic bile acids (Takikawa and
Kaplowitz, 1988
); as such, it was once named ligandin (Habig et al.,
1974
). The role as a binding protein may be to facilitate transport of
its potentially toxic ligands in the cytosolic compartment, either to
specific membrane-spanning transporters or to membrane-associated
cytochromes P450 to increase the rate of degradation of these ligands.
Thus, the presence of an element capable of supporting a
"nonclassical" or PXR-mediated mechanism of induction may be a
reflection of the importance of the ligandin role this protein plays.
The transcriptional regulation of GSTA2 by xenobiotic
compounds has been intensively studied by Picket and coworkers
(Rushmore et al. 1990
, 1991
; Nguyen and Pickett, 1992
). Two elements
have been identified, namely the AhRE and the ARE. The work
presented in this article indicates that the response element that
mediates the PXR-dependent induction of GSTA2 gene
expression is located within the ARE, because mutation of the ARE core
sequence (GTGACaaaGC to GGGACaaaGC) caused a loss
of both t-butylhydroquinone- and PXR-dependent responses.
This sequence is required for induction of GSTA2 message and protein by
metabolites of aromatic compounds, phenolic antioxidants, phorbol
esters, and hydrogen peroxide. The ARE sequence is thought to bind the
Cap-N-Collar family transcription factor, Nrf-2 and its
obligate heterodimerization partner, a member of the small maf family
(Itoh et al., 1999
). The mutation of the core sequence above has been
shown to result in loss of protein binding (Nguyen and Pickett, 1992
).
In contrast, rat QOR gene expression in hepatocytes was
negatively regulated in a monotonic manner and this response was
blunted by RU38486, suggesting a role for GR alone (J. A. Pinaire
and R. A. Prough, unpublished results; Xiao et al., 1995
). No
induction of the QOR gene products was observed. Since GSTA2
and QOR both contain ARE sequences and only GSTA2 expression
is affected by high concentrations of DEX in rat hepatocytes, the
regulation can not simply be one in which PXR interacts with Nrf-2 to
bring about this response. This suggests a novel mechanism for PXR
action, namely one in which PXR must interact with another
transcription factor.
Interestingly, the tamoxifen-dependent induction of the human
QOR gene expression in MCF-7 cells has also been shown to be mediated by an electrophilic element or ARE (Montano and
Katzenellenbogen, 1997
; Montano et al., 1998
). However, unlike the ARE
in the GSTA2 gene, the ARE in the 5'-flanking region of the
QOR gene contains a perfect canonical AP-1 site. This
effect, which requires ER
, involves protein-protein interaction with
the human prevents mitotic catastrophe 2 (hPMC2) gene (Montano et al., 2000
). At
present, it is not known whether the PXR effect observed with
GSTA2 is mediated through interaction with the Nrf-2/maf,
hPMC2 or another transcription factor. This 20-bp sequence contains
neither a nuclear receptor half site nor an AP1 sequence. The data
presented here demonstrate that expression of native rat
GSTA2 genes in cultured rat hepatocytes is biphasic and
suggest that GR and PXR account individually for the 2 phases.
In contrast to the rodent models, relatively little is known about the
effects of glucocorticoids or pregnanes on the expression of human
glutathione S-transferases. Although GR is highly conserved between rodents and humans, PXR has diverged considerably (Jones et
al., 2000
). Therefore, we cannot easily predict whether the mechanism
presented here is conserved in the human. PXR in humans has different
ligand specificity and even a different canonical binding element
sequence than the rodent PXRs. The human PXR binds preferentially to an
inverted repeat of AGGTCA half-sites separated by six nucleotides (IR6)
in contrast to the rodent DR3. Therefore, examination of the species
difference in the response, the sequence requirements for the ARE, and
the transcription factors involved will be the focus of future studies.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge Mary Pendleton for her expert technical assistance in the transient transfection experiments and to Milton Adesnick, Steven Kliewer, Michael Mathis, Dan Noonan, and Cecil Pickett for providing us with the expression plasmids used.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 22, 2001; Accepted June 12, 2001
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK54774 (R.A.P.) and a grant from the University of Louisville School of Medicine (K.C.F.).
R. A. Prough, Ph. D., Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292. E-mail: russ.prough{at}louisville.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GSTA2, glutathione S-transferase
A2;
Ah, aryl hydrocarbon;
AhRE, Ah-receptor response element;
ARE, antioxidant response
element;
PXR, pregnane X receptor;
kb, kilobase pair(s);
DEX, dexamethasone;
GR, glucocorticoid receptor;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
t-Bu-DEX, dexamethasone
t-butylacetate;
RU38486, 17
-hydroxy-11
-(4-dimethylamino-phenyl)-17
-(prop-1-ynyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one;
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
bp, base pair(s);
RXR
, retinoid
X-receptor-
;
DR3, direct repeat separated by 3 base pairs;
QOR, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and estrogen receptor-
.
J Biol Chem
273:
25443-25449This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Tamasi, K. K. M. Miller, S. L. Ripp, E. Vila, T. E. Geoghagen, and R. A. Prough Modulation of Receptor Phosphorylation Contributes to Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor {alpha} by Dehydroepiandrosterone and Other Peroxisome Proliferators Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 73(3): 968 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Callaghan, E. Crowley, S. Potter, and I. D. Kerr P-glycoprotein: So Many Ways to Turn It On J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 48(3): 365 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Falkner, J. K. Ritter, and R. A. Prough Regulation of the Rat UGT1A6 by Glucocorticoids Involves a Cryptic Glucocorticoid Response Element Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 409 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Bhadhprasit, T. Sakuma, N. Hatakeyama, M. Fuwa, K. Kitajima, and N. Nemoto Involvement of Glucocorticoid Receptor and Pregnane X Receptor in the Regulation of Mouse CYP3A44 Female-Predominant Expression by Glucocorticoid Hormone Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1880 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Urquhart, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim Nuclear Receptors and the Regulation of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters: Implications for Interindividual Variability in Response to Drugs J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. M. Shah, X. Ma, K. Morimura, I. Kim, and F. J. Gonzalez Pregnane X receptor activation ameliorates DSS-induced inflammatory bowel disease via inhibition of NF-{kappa}B target gene expression Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): G1114 - G1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jung, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and U. A. Meyer Pregnane X Receptor Is a Target of Farnesoid X Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19081 - 19091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|