|
|
|
|
Vol. 60, Issue 4, 790-796, October 2001
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany (I.W.); and Departments of Anesthesiology and Physiology & Biophysics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Equilibrium conditions of neurotransmitter concentration and receptor
binding are never achieved during synaptic transmission at the
neuromuscular junction. Thus, it is important to determine the binding
kinetics of drugs that act this synapse. Previous determinations of the
dissociation rate of (+)-tubocurarine have produced inconsistent
results ranging from 0.1 to 4000/s. Here, we used a direct approach to
measure association (
on) and dissociation (
on) rates for two competitive antagonists (clinically
used as nondepolarizing muscle relaxants), pancuronium and
(+)-tubocurarine, at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR).
We made macroscopic current recordings from outside-out patches of
BC3H-1 cells expressing embryonic mouse muscle nAChR. We used a
three-tube rapid perfusion system to make timed applications of
antagonists and acetylcholine to the patch. We made independent
measurements of the equilibrium inhibition (IC50) and the
kinetics of onset and recovery of antagonist inhibition at 20 to
23°C. Rate constants were calculated from the predictions of a single
(high-affinity) site model of competitive inhibition. For pancuronium:
IC50 = 5.5 ± 0.5 nM (mean ± S.D.),
on = 2.7 ± 0.9 × 108
M
1 s
1,
off = 2.1 ± 0.7 × 108/s. For (+)-tubocurarine:
IC50 = 41 ± 2 nM,
on = 1.2 ± 0.2 × 108 M
1 s
1,
off = 5.9 ± 1.3/s. The kinetic results
are consistent with the equilibrium results in that
off/
on is in good agreement with the
IC50 values. All differences between the antagonists are
significant at the p < 0.001 level. The higher
affinity of pancuronium is caused by a faster association rate
(2.2-fold) coupled with a slower dissociation rate (2.8-fold). The
association rates of both antagonists are comparable with or greater
than the association rate for acetylcholine binding to nAChR.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transmission at fast chemical synapses is a fundamental process in the central and peripheral nervous systems. The best-studied example is the neuromuscular junction. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) mediates rapid synaptic transmission by increasing the conductance of the postsynaptic cell membrane in response to nerve-released ACh. High speed is achieved because both the receptor and the ion channel are parts of a single protein molecule.
One complicating feature of neuromuscular transmission is the presence
of multiple binding sites for ACh. There are two nonidentical ACh
binding sites on the receptor itself. The low affinity agonist blocking
site within the pore of the channel is a third site. Acetylcholinesterase also recognizes ACh. Extrasynaptic muscle ACh
receptors and presynaptic neuronal ACh receptors provide additional ACh
binding sites. A neuronal subtype ACh receptor has been found on the
postsynaptic membrane as well (Tsuneki et al., 1995
). The presence of
competitive inhibitors (muscle relaxants) to block movement during
surgery introduces yet another molecule that can bind to the ACh
receptors. Finally, because ACh is rapidly released and hydrolyzed,
equilibrium conditions are never reached within the synapse.
A detailed description of the structure and function of the ACh
receptor is emerging from several areas of investigation. Electron
microscopy of receptors from Torpedo californica
electroplax membranes has provided structural images at 4.6-Å
resolution (Miyazawa et al., 1999
) and has revealed structural
differences between the open and closed states (Unwin, 1995
).
Site-directed mutagenesis studies have identified particular amino
acids involved in agonist and antagonist binding (Arias, 2000
) and ion
selectivity and permeation (Corringer et al., 2000
). High-resolution,
single-channel measurements have determined the rate constants for
transitions between states of the receptor (Colquhoun and Sakmann,
1981
; Zhang et al., 1995
; Maconochie and Steinbach, 1998
) and lower
limits on the speed of channel opening (Maconochie et al., 1995
;
Parzefall et al., 1998
). Patch-clamp recording during rapid application
of agonist has provided a controlled way of mimicking the physiological
exposure of ACh receptors to ACh (Brett et al., 1986
; Franke et al.,
1987
; Maconochie and Knight, 1989
).
Measurements of the kinetics of agonist association suggest that they
bind more slowly than predicted from simple diffusion (Gutfreund, 1972
;
Zhang et al., 1995
). Structural studies of T. californica
nAChR suggest the existence of ACh binding pockets accessible through
narrow tunnels in the channel wall (Miyazawa et al., 1999
). Diffusion
through these tunnels may be the limiting factor for ACh association.
It would be interesting to see if this is also true for antagonists.
The binding affinity of the prototypical antagonist, (+)-tubocurarine,
has been determined as 400 nM in frog muscle (Jenkinson, 1960
) and 250 nM in rat muscle (Colquhoun and Rang, 1976
). However, measurements of
the kinetics of antagonist binding have produced inconsistent results.
Estimates of the association rate of the prototypical antagonist,
(+)-tubocurarine range from 109
M
1 s
1 (Colquhoun and
Sheridan, 1982
; Le Dain et al., 1991
) to 5 × 105 M
1
s
1 (Bufler et al., 1996
). Similarly, estimates
of the dissociation rate range from 1000 to 4000/s (Colquhoun and
Sheridan, 1982
; Le Dain et al., 1991
) to 0.1/s (Bufler et al., 1996
).
We undertook this study to try to resolve these discrepancies.
Pancuronium was also studied as an example of a higher affinity
competitive antagonist in current use as a neuromuscular blocking agent.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied the embryonic mouse muscle nicotinic ACh receptors
expressed in clonal BC3H-1 cells. The cells were cultured as described
previously (Sine and Steinbach, 1984
). To prepare cells for patch-clamp
recording, the culture medium was replaced with an "extracellular"
solution (ECS) containing 150 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3. Patch pipettes were fabricated from borosilicate
glass and firepolished. They were filled with a solution consisting of
140 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 MgCl2, 10 (+)-glucose,
and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, and had resistances of 3 to 5 M
. An
outside-out patch (Hamill et al., 1981
) with a seal resistance of 5 G
or greater was obtained from a cell and moved into position at the
outflow of a perfusion system. The perfusion system [modified from Liu
and Dilger (1991)
] consisted of solution reservoirs;
computer-controlled, solenoid-driven pinch valves; and a three-tube
device immersed in the culture dish. The three tubes were made of glass
and were attached with epoxy so that they were coplanar and at 45°
angles from each other. One tube was connected to a reservoir
containing ECS without agonist (control), the second arm was connected
to a reservoir containing ECS with 100 µM ACh (agonist solution), and
the third arm was connected to a reservoir containing ECS with either
(+)-tubocurarine or pancuronium (test solution) [(+)-tubocurarine
chloride and pancuronium bromide; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO].
In the resting position, control solution perfused the patch. The
perfusion system allowed for a rapid solution exchange within 100 to
200 µs between each tube. When making onset- or recovery experiments (see below), we could reliably achieve a minimum duration of 10 ms for
the second solution. We tested the timing systematically using an open
electrode perfused with solutions of different ionic strength and
confirmed the optimal position of the electrode frequently using open
electrode tests.
The currents flowing during exposure of the patch to ACh were measured
with a patch clamp amplifier (EPC-9; List Medical, Darmstadt, Germany),
filtered at 3 kHz (3 db frequency, eight-pole Bessel filter), digitized
and stored on the hard disk of a laboratory computer. Data analysis was
performed off-line as described previously (Dilger et al., 1997
).
Experiments were performed at room temperature (20-23°C.). We
recorded current responses (at
50 mV) during 100- to 200-ms
applications (at 5-s intervals and sampled at 100-200 µs per point)
of ECS containing 100 µM ACh, a concentration that opens about 93%
of the nAChR channels from BC3H-1 cells (Dilger and Brett, 1990
). We
subsequently used this test solution to quantify loss of channel activity.
To determine antagonist onset kinetics, we equilibrated the patch with
ECS, perfused with antagonist for a variable time interval (10-1500
ms) and then measured the current response to 100- to 200-ms
applications of 100 µM ACh to assess the fraction of antagonist-free channels. To determine recovery kinetics, we equilibrated the patch
with antagonist, removed antagonist for variable time intervals (10-1500 ms), and then applied ACh. We repeated this with various concentrations of antagonist. The association and dissociation rate
constants were calculated from the assumption of a single-site binding
model; this corresponds to the higher affinity antagonist binding site
(Fletcher and Steinbach, 1996
). Responses of the patch to 100 µM ACh
applications were measured before and after each onset/recovery
protocol to test for loss of channel activity. Data were accepted when
these two differed by less than 10%. The ensemble mean current was
calculated from 10 to 20 individual current traces. Under most
circumstances, mean currents were fit to single exponential functions
to obtain peak and steady-state current values and a time constant of
the decay caused by desensitization. At high concentrations of
(+)-tubocurarine, the currents had a biphasic time course (see Fig. 2).
In these cases, the currents were fit to a biexponential function to
determine the current at the end of the initial activation phase. The
initial mean current was defined as the current after the initial
activation phase. We calculated the ratio of this current in the
presence and absence of the antagonists.
Data are expressed and graphed as mean ± S.D. To facilitate statistical comparison, we performed curve fits using all data points rather than the mean values. Parameters derived from curve fitting are expressed as best-fit values ± S.D. Statistical comparisons are made using an unpaired two-tailed t test. To compare association rates, we performed the t test based on the linear regression analysis (Igor Pro software; Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR) of the reciprocal of the onset time constant versus antagonist concentration (see eq. 3). This results in a mean value and S.D. of the slope.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Competitive Antagonism under Equilibrium Conditions.
In these
experiments, we equilibrated the patch with various concentrations of
the antagonist for >1 min before applying a mixture of 100 µM ACh
and the antagonist. Figure 1a shows
examples of currents seen in a single patch with 0, 3, and 30 nM
pancuronium. The control trace exhibits a rapid activation phase
whereas 100 µM ACh activates about 93% of the receptors and a
desensitization phase with a time constant of 53 ms. The main effect of
pancuronium is to reduce the peak current. The decay phase is still
described by a single exponential function, but the decay rate is
slowed at high concentrations of pancuronium (the decay time constant was 200 ms at 30 nM.). Similar effects are seen with low concentrations of (+)-tubocurarine (Fig. 1b). However, at high concentrations of
(+)-tubocurarine, the current exhibits a biphasic time course after the
initial activation phase. Figure 2 shows
an example of a current in the presence of 200 nM (+)-tubocurarine
along with a 2-exponential fitting function that describes the biphasic time course.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
|
The Kinetics of Competitive Antagonism.
We speculated that the
biphasic current response seen with (+)-tubocurarine but not with
pancuronium might be related to the rate at which the drug dissociates
from the receptor. If (+)-tubocurarine were to dissociate on the 100-ms
time scale and pancuronium were to dissociate more slowly, the slow
rise in current might be caused by ACh binding to receptors previously
bound by (+)-tubocurarine. Such behavior has been predicted
(Rang, 1966
; Aoshima et al., 1992
). Our first experimental approach to
determining the kinetics of (+)-tubocurarine is illustrated in Fig.
4. Channels were activated by 3 µM ACh,
a concentration that induces only a small amount of desensitization
within 200 ms. Equilibrium application of 500 nM (+)-tubocurarine
inhibited the current to 15% of control. Simultaneous application of
ACh and (+)-tubocurarine produced a time-dependent current that decayed
from the control level to the equilibrium level with a time constant of
16 ms (Fig. 4A.). Equilibration with (+)-tubocurarine followed by
perfusion of ACh without (+)-tubocurarine produced a relaxation from
the equilibrium to the control level with a time constant of 75 ms
(Fig. 4B.). These two numbers provided a first estimate of the kinetics
of (+)-tubocurarine association and dissociation. This experimental
approach is limited in that fast relaxation times are distorted by the
onset of the ACh-activated currents and slow relaxation times are
distorted by desensitization.
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
on) and
dissociation (
off) rate constants are related
to the time constants for onset (
on) and recovery (
off) kinetics by (Hill, 1909
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
off/
on.
Figure 8 shows the dependence of onset-
and recovery rates on antagonist concentrations and fits to eqs. 4 and
5. The results are summarized in Table 1. The association rates for
(+)-tubocurarine and pancuronium differ by a factor of 2.2 (2.7 and
1.2 × 108 M
1
s
1 for pancuronium and (+)-tubocurarine,
respectively). These are significantly different with p < 0.001 (t test; see Materials and Methods).
There is good agreement between the dissociation rates determined from
onset experiments with those from recovery experiments, but the values
from the recovery experiments are less variable. There is an even
greater difference in the dissociation rates of the two antagonists;
(+)-tubocurarine dissociates 2.8 times faster than
pancuronium (p < 0.001). The average dwell time for
(+)-tubocurarine binding is 170 ms; the dwell time is 480 ms
for pancuronium. The ratio of the dissociation to association rate
constants is in good agreement with the IC50
values determined from equilibrium experiments (Table 1). Both
dissociation and association rates contribute to the difference in
affinity between the two antagonists.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(+)-Tubocurarine and pancuronium are potent neuromuscular blockers used during general anesthesia to provide muscle relaxation. Both drugs have a long history of in vitro and in vivo investigations.
We examined the effects of these antagonists on outside-out patches
containing embryonic mouse nAChRs using a two-tube protocol to measure
equilibrium inhibition by antagonists. We found
IC50 values of 5.5 and 41 nM for pancuronium and
(+)-tubocurarine, respectively. Our data did not allow us to determine
the low affinity constants with any precision. These results are in
good agreement with published data on BC3H1 cells
and the QF18 cell line expressing embryonic mouse nAChRs. Bungarotoxin
displacement experiments on BC3H1 cells reveal
pancuronium affinities of 9.1 and 69 nM (Sine and Taylor, 1981
).
Similar experiments on QF18 cells reveal pancuronium affinities of 8 and 95 nM and (+)-tubocurarine affinities of 71 and 1100 nM (Steinbach
and Chen, 1995
; Fletcher and Steinbach, 1996
). Functional measurements
reveal similar affinities. In BC3H1 cells,
Na+ permeability was inhibited by 7.4 nM
pancuronium with a Hill coefficient of 1.16 (Sine and Taylor, 1981
). In
QF18 cells, ion currents were inhibited by 5 nM pancuronium with a Hill
coefficient of 1.23 (Fletcher and Steinbach, 1996
) and 56 nM
(+)-tubocurarine with a Hill coefficient of 1.06 (Steinbach and Chen,
1995
).
In agreement with other researchers (Steinbach and Chen, 1995
;
Fletcher and Steinbach, 1996
), we found that (+)-tubocurarine, but not
pancuronium, acts as a partial agonist on embryonic mouse nAChR (single
channel data not shown). (+)-Tubocurarine activates receptors in the
absence of ACh and also increases channel activity at low
concentrations of ACh. The latter effect is caused by activation of
hetero-liganded receptors containing ACh at one binding site and
(+)-tubocurarine at the other. The efficacy of both of these opening
pathways is very low (Steinbach and Chen, 1995
). In rapid perfusion
experiments with 100 µM ACh, the baseline currents in the presence
and absence of (+)-tubocurarine are indistinguishable. Thus, it
is unlikely that these opening pathways interfere with out kinetic measurements.
We used the three-tube perfusion protocol to measure the kinetics of
antagonist inhibition. In an onset experiment, a patch was exposed to a
drug for varying intervals before application of ACh. The shortest
interval that could reliably be attained was 10 ms. This allowed for
rates <50/s to be measured; the fastest rate we observed in these
experiments was 30/s. Pancuronium and (+)-tubocurarine have
significantly different association rates: 2.7 and 1.2 × 108 M
1
s
1, respectively. The drugs also differ in
their dissociation rates: 2.1/s and 5.9/s, respectively. The kinetic
results are consistent with the equilibrium results in that the ratio
of dissociation rate to association rate is in good agreement with the
IC50 values (Table 1).
These antagonist association rates are comparable with or greater than
the association rate for ACh determined by single channel recording
[embryonic, 4 × 107
M
1 s
1 (Zhang et al.,
1995
)1; adult, 1.7 × 108 M
1
s
1 (Akk and Auerbach, 1996
)]. The agonist
tetramethylammonium has an even slower association rate. It has been
suggested that agonist binding is not diffusion limited (GulFreund,
1972
) and may involve multiple interactions between agonist and protein
before the binding site is reached (Zhang et al., 1995
). Structural
studies of the nAChR suggest the presence of narrow tunnels leading to
agonist binding pockets within the
subunits (Miyazawa et al.,
1999
). Large antagonist molecules may not be able to diffuse freely
through such tunnels. We hypothesize that antagonists prevent the
access of agonists to the binding pocket by binding near the entrance to the tunnel. In this way, antagonists would reach their binding site
without encountering the diffusion barriers seen by agonists. If bound
agonist had a reciprocal effect on antagonist association, this model
would mimic classical competitive antagonism.
Comparison of Our Kinetic Results with Results from Other
Researchers.
Measurements of ligand binding kinetics are
complicated by fast desensitization. In addition, studies on tissue
preparations may lead to apparent slow rates because of limited access
of the ligand to its binding site. These problems may be overcome by using rapid perfusion techniques on small preparations. Ultimately, the
resolution of the perfusion system determines the fastest rates that
can be measured. The study by O'Leary et al. (1994)
of
(+)-tubocurarine binding to nAChR was limited by the speed with which a
whole oocyte can be perfused. They noted that the observed recovery of
currents from inhibition by (+)-tubocurarine had the same time course
(3-5 s) as the bath exchange in their experimental setup. Aoshima et
al. (1992)
also used oocytes, but extracted kinetic information from
the acceleration of desensitization after coapplication of agonist and
antagonist. They estimated the dissociation of (+)-tubocurarine and
pancuronium to be 70 and 39/s, respectively.
1
s
1. The disparity between these measurements
and ours could be attributed to species differences. Comparison of the
sequences of mouse and frog nAChR reveals a notable difference at
residue 59 in the
subunit. The mouse receptor has aspartic acid,
whereas the frog has alanine. Bren and Sine (1997)
2

) nAChR in our experiments, the
(+)-tubocurarine affinities for embryonic and adult mouse nAChR are
similar [71 and 61 nM, respectively (Steinbach and Chen,
1995
1 s
1. Again, the
considerably higher dissociation rate found for frog compared with
mouse may be attributed to species differences. In addition, study of
an intact neuromuscular junction allows for presynaptic effects of
(+)-tubocurarine to contribute to the observed responses.
The experiments of Bufler et al. (1996)
off/
on with
the independently measured equilibrium constants (Table 1). Our
experiments and those of Bufler et al. (1996)
on > 5 × 106 M
1
s
1. We also performed this experiment but found
a 60% decrease in peak current upon coapplication. Simulations (not
shown) suggest that this observation is consistent with a high
(+)-tubocurarine association rate. However, these simulations are very
sensitive to assumptions about the kinetics of the low affinity
antagonist binding site about which nothing is currently known.
One question remains unanswered: we did not test quantitatively whether
the biphasic current response seen in the presence of high
(+)-tubocurarine concentrations is caused by fast dissociation of
(+)-tubocurarine. The combination of antagonist, partial agonist, and
hetero-liganded agonist actions of (+)-tubocurarine on embryonic receptors makes this system difficult to model. The companion article
(Demazumder and Dilger, 2001| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Claire Mettewie for maintenance of cell cultures, Ana Maria Vidal for performance of single channel experiments, Deeptankar Demazumder for helpful discussions, and Drs. Leon Moore and Chris Claussen for advice on statistical analyses.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 19, 2001; Accepted July 3, 2001
1
This low value for ACh association in embryonic
receptors is incompatible with the fast activation on-rates measured at
various concentrations of ACh in QF18 cells by Maconochie and Steinbach (1998)
. They used 2.5 × 108 M
1
s
1 in their simulations.
2 The IC50 value for (+)-tubocurarine on adult mouse AChR expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells is 30 nM (our unpublished observations).
This research was supported in part by National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant GM42095, the Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, and the Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität Bonn, Germany. Parts of this work were presented in abstract form: Anesthesiology 91:A1046, 1999 and Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 35:607-608, 2000.
James P. Dilger, Ph.D., Department of Anesthesiology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8480. E-mail: jdilger{at}epo.som.sunysb.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
nAChR, acetylcholine receptor; ACh, acetylcholine; ECS, extracellular solution.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
bungarotoxin to acetylcholine receptors in rat muscle.
Mol Pharmacol
12:
519-535This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Liu and J. P. Dilger Site Selectivity of Competitive Antagonists for the Mouse Adult Muscle Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2009; 75(1): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Liu and J. P. Dilger Synergy Between Pairs of Competitive Antagonists at Adult Human Muscle Acetylcholine Receptors Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 525 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Demazumder and J. P. Dilger The kinetics of competitive antagonism of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at physiological temperature J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 951 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Beato, V. Burzomato, and L. G. Sivilotti The kinetics of inhibition of rat recombinant heteromeric {alpha}1beta glycine receptors by the low-affinity antagonist SR-95531 J. Physiol., April 1, 2007; 580(1): 171 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Ford, M. Matchett, J. E. Krause, and W. Yu The P2X3 Antagonist P1, P5-Di[inosine-5'] Pentaphosphate Binds to the Desensitized State of the Receptor in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2005; 315(1): 405 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Hansen, Z. Radic', T. T. Talley, B. E. Molles, T. Deerinck, I. Tsigelny, and P. Taylor Tryptophan Fluorescence Reveals Conformational Changes in the Acetylcholine Binding Protein J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 41299 - 41302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Demazumder and J. P. Dilger The Kinetics of Competitive Antagonism by Cisatracurium of Embryonic and Adult Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 797 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||