![]() |
|
|
Vol. 60, Issue 5, 900-906, November 2001
Departments of Experimental Therapeutics (M.S., Y.L., Z.F.) and Molecular Genetics (J.M.P., G.L.), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and ASTA Medica AG (G.B., T.B.), Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, the differential role of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 in cell cycle regulation was proposed for use in screening natural or synthetic compounds for cell cycle-dependent (particularly M phase-dependent) antineoplastic activity. p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 was ectopically expressed with an ecdysone-inducible mammalian expression system in a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line. Induction of p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 expression inhibited the activities of CDK2 and completely arrested cells at G1 phase of the cell cycle by p27Kip1 and at G1 and G2 phases by p21Waf1. We examined the sensitivity of these cells to several antineoplastic agents known to be cell cycle-dependent or -independent. Substantially increased resistance to cell cycle-dependent antineoplastic agents was found in the cells when the expression of p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 was induced. In contrast, only a desensitization to cell cycle-independent antineoplastic agents was found in the cells arrested by p21Waf1 or p27Kip1. Because p21Waf1 induces an additional block at G2 phase that inhibits cell entry into M phase, we further examined the difference between p21Waf1- and p27Kip1-induced cells in their sensitivity to D-24851, a novel M phase-dependent compound. We found that induction of p21Waf1 after exposure of the cells to D-24851 conferred stronger resistance than did induction of p27Kip1. Taken together, our results suggest that the differential effect of p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 on cell cycle regulation may be advantageous for screening chemical libraries for novel antineoplastic candidates that are cell cycle-dependent, and M phase-dependent in particular.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
identification of a group of nuclear enzymes called cyclin-dependent
kinases (CDK) has profoundly advanced our understanding of cell cycle
progression (Garrett and Fattaey, 1999
; Johnson and Walker, 1999
). CDK
activity is primarily stimulated by the binding of
G1 cyclins in response to the effects of both
mitogenic growth factors and the extracellular matrix; CDK activity is
opposed by the so-called CDK inhibitors, such as
p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 (Sherr
and Roberts, 1999
). p21Waf1 was initially
identified as a p53-dependent gene product in cells with wild-type p53
after exposure of the cells to DNA-damaging agents (Harper et al.,
1993
; Dulic et al., 1994
), and it has since been shown that
p21Waf1 can also be induced in a p53-independent
manner (Michieli et al., 1994
; Macleod et al., 1995
). In contrast,
p27Kip1 was first discovered in Mv1Lu mink lung
epithelial cells arrested at G1 phase of the cell
cycle by contact inhibition or by treatment with transforming growth
factor-
(Toyoshima and Hunter, 1994
; Polyak et al., 1994
).
We and others have recently reported that, in contrast to
p27Kip1, which arrests cell cycle traversal
solely at G1 phase (Coats et al., 1996
; Rivard et
al., 1996
), p21Waf1 arrests the cell cycle at
both G1 phase and G2 phase
(Cayrol et al., 1998
; Medema et al., 1998
; Schmidt et al., 2000
). The latter arrest at G2 phase is caused by
p21Waf1-mediated inhibition of CDC2 activity,
which is required for cells to enter M phase of the cell cycle. The
differential modulation of cell cycle traversal by
p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 was
correlated with their effects on the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel, an M
phase-dependent antineoplastic drug used to treat a variety of human
cancers (Rowinsky, 1997
; Aisner and Cortes-Funes, 1997
). When
ectopically expressed, both p21Waf1 and
p27Kip1 conferred resistance to
paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis on the cells. However, induction of
p21Waf1 after exposure to paclitaxel produced
much greater resistance to the drug than did expression of
p27Kip1 (Schmidt et al., 2000
). This result was
attributed to the additional G2 phase block by
p21Waf1, which prevented cells from entering M
phase of the cell cycle and becoming committed to apoptosis after
paclitaxel treatment (Schmidt et al., 2000
).
Given the remarkable chemoresistance toward paclitaxel in
p21Waf1- or
p27Kip1-arrested cells, we examined a panel of
chemotherapeutic agents that were categorized for their cell
cycle-dependent or -independent antineoplastic activities. Cell cycle
dependence in this context refers to the fact that active cell cycling
is required for an antineoplastic agent to exert a cytotoxic effect
(Myers and Chabner, 1990
; Perry, 1992
). DNA-intercalating,
cross-linking, or alkylating agents (such as cisplatin and melphalan)
do not necessarily require their targeted cells to be actively cycling;
in contrast, antimetabolites and topoisomerase inhibitors (such as
5-fluorouracil and camptothecin) may be toxic to the cells only during
the S phase of a cell cycle, and agents that interfere with the mitotic
spindle (such as paclitaxel) may kill the cells primarily during M
phase. We observed a substantially increased resistance to several
known cell cycle-dependent antineoplastic agents in
p21Waf1- or p27Kip1-induced
cells, compared with uninduced cells, whereas only a desensitation of
the arrested cells was observed upon treatment with several known cell
cycle-independent agents. Additionally, we found that
p21Waf1 and p27Kip1, when
induced after drug exposure, conferred differential chemoresistance to
the cytotoxicity of D-24851, a novel M phase-dependent compound (Bacher
et al., 2001
) in a manner very similar to what we reported of their
effects on the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel, a well-known antineoplastic
agent with M phase-dependent action (Schmidt et al., 2000
). Our results
suggest that this p21Waf1- and
p27Kip1-inducible expression system might be a
useful tool for determining not only the cell cycle dependence but also
the M phase dependence of candidate compounds after the antineoplastic
activity of the candidate compounds has been established during a
primary high-throughput screening assay.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stable RKO p21Waf1- and
p27Kip1-Inducible Expression Clones.
The
RKO human colon carcinoma cells containing an ecdysone-inducible
expression vector of p21Waf1 or
p27Kip1 (RKO-p21 or RKO-p27) were described
previously (Schmidt et al., 2000
). Briefly, human waf1 and kip1 cDNAs
were amplified by polymerase chain reaction techniques using MCF10A
human nonmalignant mammary epithelial cell cDNA as a template and
subcloned into pIND (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) via restriction sites
included in the waf1- and kip1-specific oligonucleotide primers. The
pINDp21Waf1 or pINDp27Kip1
vector was transfected with the Fugene-6 kit (Roche Diagnostic Corp.,
Indianapolis, IN) into an RKO cell clone that was previously transfected with the pIND-regulatory vector pVgRXR (Invitrogen); the
latter contains a transgene carrying an ecdysone-responsive regulatory
sequence. Stable pINDp21Waf1-transfected or
pINDp27Kip1-transfected clones (RKO-p21 or
RKO-p27) were kept in double-selection culture medium containing 200 µg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 500 µg/ml
neomycin (G418). Expression of p21Waf1 or
p27Kip1 was induced by exposure to 3 µM
muristerone A for 24 h and examined by Western blot analysis with
specific antibodies.
Antineoplastic Agents.
The antineoplastic agents used in
this study were as follows: cisplatin (Platinol-AQ) and etoposide
(VePesid) were from Bristol Laboratories (Princeton, NJ); doxorubicin
(Adriamycin) was from Gensia Sicor Pharmaceuticals (Irvine, CA);
melphalan (Alkeran) was from GlaxoSmithKline (Research Triangle Park,
NC); 5-fluorouracil (Adrucil) was from Pharmacia (Kalamazoo, MI);
camptothecin was from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO); and D-24851
(N-[pyridin-4-yl]-[1-[4-chlorbenzyl]-indol-3-yl]-glyoxyl-amid) was from ASTA Medica AG (Frankfurt, Germany) (Bacher et al., 2001
).
Western Blot Analysis.
Western blot analysis was performed
as described previously (Fan et al., 1995
). Briefly, RKO-p21 or RKO-p27
cells were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM
NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25 µg/ml leupeptin, and 25 µg/ml
aprotinin, and the lysates were sonicated at 4°C. Equal amounts of
lysate were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and subsequently
blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes for incubation with antibodies
against p21Waf1 (Neo Markers Biotechnology Inc.,
Union City, CA), p27Kip1, Rb, or the Rb-related
p130 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Santa Cruz, CA). Specific signals
were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit
(ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ).
CDK Assays.
The CDK assay with GST-Rb (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) as a substrate was performed as reported previously (Fan
et al., 1995
; Wu et al., 1996
). Briefly, cells were lysed as described
above. CDK2 was immunoprecipitated from sonicated lysates with
corresponding antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and subjected to an
in vitro kinase reaction in the presence of the CDK substrate GST-Rb
and [
-32P]ATP, followed by separation with
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.
Flow Cytometric Analysis.
After completion of the desired
treatment, RKO-p21 or RKO-p27 cells were harvested by trypsinization,
and an aliquot of 1 × 106 cells was washed
once with cold phosphate-buffered saline and then fixed with cold 70%
ethanol. The DNA was stained with a solution containing 25 µg/ml
propidium iodide and 10 µg/ml RNase A (Sigma Chemical Co) in
phosphate-buffered saline for 6 h. Cell cycle distribution was
analyzed with a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San
Jose, CA) at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm (Fan et al., 1995
).
Cytotoxicity Analysis (MTT Assay).
Cell viability was
measured by a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) assay (Schmidt et al., 2000
). The cytotoxic effects of
selected drugs on RKO-p21 or RKO-p27 with and without induction of
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 were
determined after drug treatment, and the results were expressed as a
percentage of relative cell numbers of control cells that were not
exposed to the drugs. Briefly, after desired treatment, cells were
incubated with 1 mg/ml MTT (Sigma) in 0.5 ml of culture medium for
3 h in a 37°C CO2 incubator, followed by
cell lysis with 0.5 ml of lysis buffer containing 20% SDS in dimethyl
formamide/H2O, pH 4.7, at 37°C for more than
6 h. Optical absorbance of the cell lysate was determined at a
wavelength of 595 nm.
Determination of Mitotic Index.
Upon completion of the
desired treatment, cells were harvested by trypsinization. An aliquot
(5 × 103 cells) was spun onto glass slides
using a Cytospin and subsequently fixed and stained with the Hema-3 kit
(Biochemical Sciences, Inc., Swedesboro, NJ). Two hundred cells were
counted each time under a microscope from different areas for a total
of five times. Cells in mitotic phase were scored individually, and the
numbers were expressed as the percentage of the total cell number
counted. Representative areas for each treatment condition were
photographed (Schmidt et al., 2000
).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The p21Waf1- or
p27Kip1-Inducible Expression RKO Cell
Clones.
RKO cells are human colon cancer cells that contain
wild-type p53 and Rb and express very low levels of endogenous
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 (Boyd et
al., 1988
; Kessis et al., 1993
; van Bree et al., 1999
; Schmidt et al.,
2000
). Figure 1A presents Western blot
analysis data showing the expression of p21Waf1
or p27Kip1 in representative RKO-p21 and RKO-p27
transfectant clones upon gene induction. Expression of
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 was
detectable approximately 2 h after the gene expression inducer muristerone A was added to the cell culture medium. The expression level reached a plateau approximately 24 h after induction, and expression persisted for at least 72 h without further
supplementation with muristerone A (Schmidt et al., 2000
). Induction of
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 strongly
inhibited CDK2 activity (Fig. 1B). This inhibition of CDK2 activity was
accompanied by dephosphorylation of Rb and the Rb-related p130 protein
(Fig. 1C). Flow cytometric analysis further indicated that induction of
p27Kip1 completely arrested the cells at
G1 phase of the cell cycle within 24 h,
whereas induction of p21Waf1 arrested the cells
at both G1 and G2, although most cells were arrested in G1 phase. Cell proliferation was
completely inhibited upon the expression of
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1. No
signs of cytotoxic effects were observed up to 5 days after the induced
expression of p21Waf1 or
p27Kip1 (data not shown).
|
Effect of p21Waf1- and
p27Kip1-Inducible Expression on the Cytotoxicity
of Antineoplastic Agents.
Fig. 2A
shows the treatment schedule of RKO-p21 and RKO-p27 cells with three
representative antineoplastic agents known to be cell cycle-dependent
(5-fluorouracil, camptothecin, and etoposide). RKO-p21 and RKO-p27
cells showed a concentration-dependent response to the cytotoxic
effects mediated by these three drugs (Fig. 2B). Continuous expression
of either p21Waf1 or
p27Kip1 conferred on these cells nearly complete
resistance to cell death induced by 5-fluorouracil, camptothecin, or
etoposide. The IC50 values in
p21Waf1- or
p27Kip1-uninduced cells versus
p21Waf1- or p27Kip1-induced
cells shifted from approximately 40 µM to >1,000 µM for 5-fluorouracil, from 160 nM to >10,000 nM for camptothecin, and from
35 µM to >1,000 µM for etoposide. Induction of
p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 did not
produce any noticeable difference in conferring resistance on the
RKO-p21 and RKO-p27 cells to cell cycle-dependent antineoplastic agents.
|
Cell Cycle-Dependent Antineoplastic Activity of
D-24851.
On the basis of our results with known antineoplastic
agents, we next evaluated the cytotoxicity of
N-[pyridin-4-yl]-[1-[4-chlorbenzyl]-indol-3-yl]-glyoxyl-amid (D-24851), a novel investigational synthetic compound. D-24851 is a
successful candidate for antineoplastic activity, having been selected
by a cell-based, high-throughput screening assay by ASTA Medica AG,
Germany. The compound is a novel synthetic microtubule inhibitor, and
we have shown that D-24851 has potent cytotoxic properties in vitro and
in vivo with much less neurotoxicity than occurs with paclitaxel
(Bacher et al., 2001
).
|
M Phase-Dependent Antineoplastic Activity of D-24851.
We took
the advantage of the additional G2 block produced
by induction of p21Waf1 in the RKO-p21 cells (but
not by induction of p27Kip1 in the RKO-p27 cells)
to further confirm that the antineoplastic activity of D-24851 depends
on arrest of the cells in M phase of the cell cycle. In contrast to the
experiments shown in Fig. 3, in which cell cycle arrest was achieved by
induction of either p21Waf1 (a dual
G1 and G2 arrest) or
p27Kip1 (a complete G1
arrest) before the exposure of RKO-p21 or RKO-p27 to D-24851 and
continued during the 72-h postdrug period,
p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 were
induced only during the 72-h postdrug period (Fig.
4A). In this experimental setting, the
cell cycle distribution in both the RKO-p21 and RKO-27 cells was
supposed to be identical to that in their parental RKO cells before
drug exposure; thus, equal percentages of cells in different phases of
the cell cycle would be exposed to D-24851 during the 3-h pulse
treatment period. Compared with the results shown in Fig. 3B, induction
of p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 after
exposure to D-24851 produced a less strong resistance of the
RKO-p21 and RKO-p-27 cells to D-24851-induced cytotoxicity (Fig. 4B), which is to be expected because in this setting, both the
RKO-p21 and RKO-p27 cells were still actively progressing through the
cell cycle during the drug exposure. However, this change in the
sequence of p21Waf1 or
p27Kip1 induction with reference to drug exposure
produced differential effects between p21Waf1 and
p27Kip1 on mediating cell resistance to
D-24851-mediated cytotoxicity measured 72 h later. Notably,
induction of p27Kip1 resulted in much less
chemoresistance to D-24851 than did induction of
p21Waf1 (a >30-fold difference). It took
approximately 24 h after D-24851 treatment for the cell cycle
distribution pattern to transit from a normal pattern to an M
phase-dominant pattern (Fig. 3C). The result shown in Fig. 4B suggested
that the additional effect of p21Waf1 at
G2 phase that impeded the entrance of cells into
M phase during the period after D24851 treatment may have contributed
to this difference in conferring D-24851 resistance to cells. The data therefore indicate that entry into M phase might be critical for D-24851-induced cytotoxicity (M phase-dependent toxicity).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Screening for potential antineoplastic compounds from chemical libraries is often hampered by the lack of a system that can distinguish a potential antineoplastic compound from nonspecific toxins, such as poisons of the respiratory chain. In this study, the CDK inhibitors p21Waf1 and p27Kip1, which were ectopically expressed in a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line and showed differential effects on cell cycle arrest (a complete G1 phase arrest of the cell cycle by p27Kip1 and a dual G1 and G2 phase arrest by p21Waf1), were evaluated for their application in drug discovery studies by investigating their modulation of cell sensitivity to several antineoplastic agents known to be cell cycle-dependent and -independent and to D-24851, a novel investigational compound.
We first showed that the p21Waf1 and
p27Kip1-inducible expression system could
distinguish between cell cycle-dependent and -independent antineoplastic agents. Induction of p21Waf1 in
the RKO-p21 or p27Kip1 in the RKO-p27 cells
conferred marked resistance to cell cycle-dependent drugs but only
moderately desensitized the cells to cell cycle-independent drugs. We
performed similar studies with another cell line, A431 human epidermoid
carcinoma cells. We found that inducible expression of either
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 caused
markedly increased resistance of the cells to chemotherapeutic agents,
but we did not find substantial differences in drug resistance between
paclitaxel (cell cycle-dependent) and cisplatin (cell cycle-independent) in A431 cells, presumably because A431 cells contain
a mutated p53, whereas RKO cells have wild-type p53 (Schmidt and Fan,
2001
).
In Fig. 2C, the relative cell number pattern reflecting the
cytotoxicity after exposure of the cells to lower concentrations of
doxorubicin and melphalan seems similar to the pattern after exposure
of the cells to the cell cycle-dependent compounds. This is probably
because doxorubicin inhibits DNA topoisomerase II at lower
concentrations and intercalcates with DNA at higher concentrations (Bodley et al., 1989
). We speculate that this may also be the case with melphalan.
Our current results lead us to propose the use of this RKO cell-based system for screening natural or synthetic compounds that have cell cycle-dependent antineoplastic activities, after the antineoplastic activities of these candidate compounds have been established during a primary high-throughput screening assay.
We further demonstrated that the differential effects of
p21Waf1 and p27Kip1 on the
cell cycle presented an additional advantage for the identification of
candidate compounds that are M phase-dependent. We showed recently that
the G2 block produced by
p21Waf1, but not by
p27Kip1, contributed to their unequal modulation
of sensitivity to paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis (Schmidt et al., 2000
).
In the current study, we used this system to demonstrate that the
cytotoxicity of the investigational compound D-24851 is M
phase-dependent. Our results suggest that, by comparing the
cytotoxicity of candidate compounds from chemical libraries in the
RKO-p21 and RKO-p27 cells with and without postdrug induction of
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1, we may
be able to determine whether the antineoplastic activities of those
candidate compounds are M phase-dependent. Thus, this cell-based system
presented here may be used not only for screening for cell
cycle-dependent antineoplastic compounds, but also for determining
which candidate compounds are M phase-dependent.
The therapeutic index of a potential antineoplastic compound is in principal based on its preferential activity to rapidly dividing cells. Screening of chemical libraries with the described p21Waf1- and p27Kip1-inducible system will not only provide information on the mode of antineoplastic activity but also predict possible adverse effects of candidate compounds on normal cells. Our system compares the antineoplastic activity of candidate compounds on proliferating cells versus quiescent cells of the same type and genetic background, thus providing unbiased information on both the therapeutic index and the mode of action.
Cell cycle synchronization can also be achieved by several known
chemical compounds such as aphidicolin or nocodazole; however, these
compounds are all very toxic to target cells and are therefore unfit
for drug-screening studies. Additionally, serum deprivation is
frequently used to synchronize cells; however, as has been observed in
many cancerous cells, serum deprivation was not successful in inducing
cell cycle synchronization in the RKO cells. In fact, it has been
suggested that the mechanism of serum deprivation-induced cell cycle
synchronization is mediated primarily by induction of
p27Kip1 (Coats et al., 1996
). Induction of
p21Waf1 in RKO-p21 cells or
p27Kip1 in RKO-p27 cells does not cause any
notable cytotoxic effects in RKO cells and thus avoids any overlay of
cytotoxic effects on a candidate compound; therefore, any observed
cytotoxicity could be attributed primarily to the effect of the
candidate compound. Other approaches, such as analysis of
fluorescence-activated cell sorting, can provide information on the
cell cycle distribution caused by candidate compounds but cannot
indicate in which phase such compounds may be effective in killing
cancer cells or inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.
Although inducible or constitutive expression of
p21Waf1 or p27Kip1 in
cancer cells has been described in the literature during the last
several years (St Croix et al., 1996
, 1998
; Rivard et al., 1996
;
Niculescu et al., 1998
; Ruan et al., 1998
; Yamamoto et al., 1999
),
these previous studies have not demonstrated a complete cell cycle
arrest by p21waf1 or
p27kip1 and a differential cell cycle arrest by
p21waf1 or p27kip1 as shown
in our system (Fig. 1D). Our system can be used in a highly
standardized setting, allowing for very reproducible results. This
p21Waf1- and
p27Kip1-inducible expression system may also be
used to examine the requirement or correlation of an active cell cycle
with reference to the cytotoxic effects of a variety of other known
cytotoxic agents, such as cytokines, and other anticancer treatments,
such as radiation therapy.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank K. Ramirez (Flow Cytometry Core Facility) for technical assistance and M. Worley (Department of Scientific Publications) for editorial assistance with the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 27, 2001; Accepted July 11, 2001
1 Current address: Byk Gulden GmbH, Dept. RPR/P3 Oncology Research, Konstanz, Germany.
2 Current address: Axxima Pharmaceuticals AG, Martinsried, Germany.
This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Core Grant CA16672, a research award from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and an M. D. Anderson Cancer Center start-up fund (to Z.F.). M.S. was supported by a fellowship from the Ernst Schering Research Foundation, Berlin, Germany.
Dr. Zhen Fan, Box 36, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030-4095. E-mail: zfan{at}mdanderson.org
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; Rb, retinoblastoma; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MTT, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; D-24851, (N-[pyridin-4-yl]-[1-[4-chlorbenzyl]-indol-3-yl]-glyoxyl-amid).
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Fink, K. Sanders, A. Rippl, S. Finkernagel, T. L. Beckers, and M. Schmidt Cell type dependent effects of Polo-like kinase 1 inhibition compared with targeted polo box interference in cancer cell lines Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2007; 6(12): 3189 - 3197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-J. Lih, W. Wei, and S. N. Cohen Txr1: a transcriptional regulator of thrombospondin-1 that modulates cellular sensitivity to taxanes Genes & Dev., August 1, 2006; 20(15): 2082 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takahashi, F. Yamasaki, T. Sudo, H. Itamochi, S. Adachi, M. Tamamori-Adachi, and N. T. Ueno Cyclin A-associated kinase activity is needed for paclitaxel sensitivity Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2005; 4(7): 1039 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Waldman Markers of Cell Cycle-Mediated Drug Resistance And Prognosis Of Patients Receiving Preoperative Combined Modality Therapy For Rectal Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2004; 11(11): 949 - 950. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||