![]() |
|
|
Vol. 61, Issue 1, 73-84, January 2002
)(trans)-3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide-Induced
Desensitization and Phosphorylation between Human and Rat
-Opioid
Receptors Expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
Department of Pharmacology and Center for Substance Abuse Research, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The agonist
(
)(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide
[(
)U50,488H] caused desensitization of the human
-opioid
receptor (hkor) and Flag-tagged hkor (Flag-hkor) but not the rat
-opioid receptor (rkor) and Flag-tagged rkor (Flag-rkor) stably
expressed in CHO cells as assessed by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) binding. In
addition, (
)U50,488H stimulation enhanced phosphorylation of the
Flag-hkor, but not Flag-rkor. (
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation of
the Flag-hkor was reduced by expression of the dominant negative mutant
GRK2-K220R, demonstrating the involvement of G protein-coupled receptor
kinases (GRKs). However, expression of GRK2 and arrestin-2 or GRK3 and
arrestin-3 did not result in desensitization or phosphorylation of the
Flag-rkor after (
)U50,488H pretreatment. To understand the molecular
basis of the species differences, we constructed two Flag-tagged
chimeric receptors, Flag-h/rkor and Flag-r/hkor, in which the
C-terminal domains of Flag-hkor and Flag-rkor were switched. When
stably expressed in CHO cells, Flag-r/hkor, but not Flag-h/rkor, was desensitized and phosphorylated after exposure to (
)U50,488H, indicating that the C-terminal domain plays a critical role in the
differences. We then generated a Flag-hkor mutant, in which S358 was
mutated to N (Flag-hkorS358N) and a Flag-rkor mutant, in which N358 was
substituted with S (Flag-rkorN358S). Although Flag-hkorS358N was not
phosphorylated or desensitized by (
)U50,488H stimulation,
Flag-rkorN358S underwent (
)U50,488H-induced desensitization with
slightly increased phosphorylation. These results indicate that there
are differences in (
)U50,488H-induced desensitization and
phosphorylation between the hkor and the rkor. In addition, the
C-terminal domain plays a crucial role in these differences and the 358 locus contributes to the differences. Our findings suggest caution in
extrapolating studies on
-opioid receptor regulation from rats to humans.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) show attenuated responsiveness to
agonists after prolonged or repeated activation. Three temporally
distinct processes that occur over a time scale of seconds to days have
been demonstrated: desensitization (seconds to hours), internalization
(minutes to hours), and down-regulation (hours to days) (for reviews,
see Krupnick and Benovic, 1998
; Law et al., 2000
). Binding of an
agonist to a GPCR, in addition to activating downstream effectors, also
initiates adaptive responses by enhancing phosphorylation of the
receptor. Phosphorylation in most cases occur in the C-terminal domain
and/or the third intracellular loop, which is catalyzed by GPCR kinases
(GRKs) and, in some cases, protein kinases activated by second
messengers. Phosphorylation of the GPCR facilitates the binding of
arrestins, leading to the uncoupling of the GPCR from G proteins and,
hence, reduced responsiveness to the cognate agonists. Binding of
arrestins also results in internalization of the receptor, which is a
rapid agonist-induced movement of the receptor into intracellular
compartments from the plasma membrane, where it is unavailable for
signal transduction. Down-regulation involves a reduction in the number
of the receptor.
Opioid receptors belong to the rhodopsin subfamily of the GPCR family
and can be classified into at least three types (µ,
, and
)
based on pharmacological (for review, see Pasternak, 1988
), anatomical
(for review, see Mansour et al., 1988
), and molecular (for review, see
Knapp et al., 1995
) analyses. Activation of
-opioid receptors
produces many effects, including analgesia (von Voigtlander et al.,
1983
; Dykstra et al., 1987
), dysphoria (Pfeiffer et al., 1986
; Dykstra
et al., 1987
) and water diuresis (von Voigtlander et al., 1983
; Dykstra
et al., 1987
), hypothermia (Adler and Geller, 1993
), and modulation of
immune responses (Taub et al., 1991
). Activation of
-opioid
receptors is coupled via pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins to affect
a variety of effectors, which include adenylate cyclase, potassium
channels, and calcium channels and the p42/p44 mitogen-activated
protein kinase pathway (for review, see Law et al., 2000
).
Chronic use of
-opioid agonists causes tolerance (Murray and Cowan,
1988
; Bhargava et al., 1989
) that can be partially accounted for at the
receptor level (von Voigtlander et al., 1983
; Bhargava et al., 1989
;
Morris and Herz, 1989
). Agonist-induced desensitization of the
-opioid receptor was examined in cell systems with different results. Incubation with
(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide (U50,488H) or U69,593 was found to cause desensitization of the human
-opioid receptor (hkor) stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (Ling et al., 1998
; Zhu et al., 1998
) or
HEK-293 cells (Blake et al., 1997
) and the mouse
-opioid receptor expressed in AtT-20 cells (Tallent et al., 1998
). Appleyard et al.
(1997)
demonstrated that the
-receptor in guinea pig hippocampal slices was desensitized and phosphorylated in an agonist-dependent manner. In contrast, treatment with U50,488H or U69,593 did not cause
desensitization of the mouse
-receptor in R1.1 thymoma cells (Joseph
and Bidlack, 1995
) or the rat
-opioid receptor (rkor) stably
expressed in CHO cells (Avidor-Reiss et al., 1995
). Inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase (Avidor-Reiss et al., 1995
;
Joseph and Bidlack, 1995
; Blake et al., 1997
; Tallent et al., 1998
; Zhu
et al., 1998
), enhancement of [35S]GTP
S
binding (Zhu et al., 1998
), increase in K+
current (Appleyard et al., 1997
; Tallent et al., 1998
) and
extracellular acidification response (Ling et al., 1998
) were employed
as functional endpoints. In Xenopus laevis oocytes
expressing the rkor, U69,593 caused a slight desensitization and
expression of GRK3 or GRK5 and arrestin-3 greatly enhanced the extent
of desensitization with K+ current as the
functional endpoint (Henry et al., 1995
; Appleyard et al., 1999
). The
discrepancy in these studies may be attributed to differences in cell
system, functional endpoint, and species of origin of the
-receptor clones.
We previously observed that after exposure to (
)U50,488H, the hkor
expressed in CHO cells underwent desensitization, internalization, and
down-regulation (Zhu et al., 1998
; Li et al., 1999
, 2000
) and
internalization and down-regulation occurred via GRK-, arrestin-, and
dynamin-dependent pathways (Li et al., 1999
, 2000
). In contrast, the
rkor stably expressed in CHO cells did not undergo internalization and
down-regulation when activated by (
)U50,488H (Li et al., 1999
, 2000
;
Jordan et al., 2000
). However, no comparison between the hkor and the
rkor in the same system in agonist-induced desensitization and
phosphorylation has been reported. In this study, we first assessed
whether there was a difference in (
)U50,488H-induced desensitization
of the hkor and the rkor stably expressed in CHO cells. We found that
the hkor was desensitized, but the rkor was not. The differences
between the rkor and the hkor receptors in CHO cells provided a unique
opportunity to delineate the mechanisms underlying agonist-induced
regulation of the hkor. The amino acid sequences of the hkor and the
rkor are 94.2% identical (Zhu et al., 1995
). To understand the
molecular basis of the hkor-rkor difference in (
)U50,488H-induced
desensitization, we epitope-tagged the hkor and the rkor and generated
chimeric and mutant receptors. Whether the chimeras and mutants were
desensitized and phosphorylated by (
)U50,488H treatment was
investigated. [35S]GTP
S binding, which has
been established as a functional measure of the
-opioid receptor
activation (Zhu et al., 1997
), was used as the endpoint.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
[35S]GTP
S (~1,250
Ci/mmol), [3H]diprenorphine (58 Ci/mmol), and
[32P]orthophosphate (8,500-9,100 Ci/mmol) were
purchased from PerkinElmer Life Science (Boston, MA). (
)U50,488H was
provided by Upjohn Co. (Kalamazoo, MI). Naloxone was a gift from
DuPont/Merck Co. (Wilmington, DE). Rabbit polyclonal antibody against
the Flag epitope, GDP, GTP
S, sodium fluouride, calyculin A, and
tetrasodium pyrophosphate were obtained from Sigma Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Pansorbin was obtained from Calbiochem (La, Jolla, CA). Enhanced
chemiluminesence Western blotting detection reagents were purchased
from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ). Horseradish
peroxidase-linked goat polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG was produced by New
England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Geneticin was purchased from Mediatech
Co. (Herndon, VA). Protease inhibitor cocktail was obtained from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN). LipofectAMINE and enzymes
and chemicals used in molecular biology and mutagenesis experiments were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), Promega (Madison, WI),
Roche Molecular Biochemicals, and QIAGEN Co. (Valencia, CA). Expression
constructs of GRK2, GRK2-K220R, GRK3, arrestin-2, arrestin-3, and
Flag-tagged
2-adrenergic receptor were gifts
from Dr. Jeffrey L. Benovic of Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine.
Establishment of CHO Cell Lines and Cell Culture.
Clonal CHO
cell lines stably expressing the hkor, rkor, Flag-hkor, Flag-rkor,
Flag-r/hkor, Flag-h/rkor, Flag-hkorS358N, and Flag-rkorN358S receptors
were established as described previously (Chen et al., 1995
). Cells
were cultured in 100-mm culture dishes in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium F12 HAM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 0.2 mg/ml
geneticin, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in a
humidified atmosphere consisting of 5% CO2 and
95% air at 37°C.
Pretreatment with the
-Agonist (
)U50,488H.
At ~90%
confluence, cells were washed once with 100 mM phosphate-buffered
saline and treated without (control) or with the
-opioid agonist
(
)U50,488H (1 µM) in the medium for an indicated period. Cells were
washed four times with cold Kreb's solution on ice to remove
(
)U50,488H.
Membrane Preparation.
Membranes were prepared according to
Li et al. (2001)
with some modifications. Briefly, the CHO cells were
pelleted, frozen at
80°C for at least 30 min, thawed in cold lysis
buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, 10 µM
leupeptin, 10 mM sodium fluouride, and 10 mM tetrasodium pyrophosphate,
pH 7.4) and vortexed. Cell suspension was passed through a 1-ml
29G3/8 syringe needle five times and centrifuged.
Pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0), passed
through the syringe needle, and centrifuged, and the processes were
repeated. Membranes were suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4),
and protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid
method of Smith et al. (1985)
.
Saturation Binding of [3H]Diprenorphine.
Saturation binding of [33H]diprenorphine to the
wild-type, chimeric, and mutant
-opioid receptors was performed with
at least six concentrations of
[33H]diprenorphine (ranging from 25 pM to 1-2
nM) and Kd and
Bmax values were determined. Binding was
carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 1 mM EGTA (pH 7.4) at
room temperature for 1 h in duplicate in a final volume of 1 ml
with 10 to 20 µg of membrane protein. Naloxone (10 µM) was used to
define nonspecific binding. Binding data were analyzed with the
EBDA program (McPherson, 1983
).
[35S]GTP
S Binding Assay.
Determination of
[35S]GTP
S binding to G proteins was carried
out with a procedure modified from that of Li et al. (2001)
. For each
experiment, 10 µg of membrane protein was incubated with 15 µM GDP
and 0.2 nM [35S]GTP
S in reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, and
0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4) in a final volume of 0.5 ml.
Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µM GTP
S.
Seven concentrations (10 pM-10 µM) of (
)U50,488H were used to
generate dose-response curves. After 60 min of incubation at 30°C,
bound and free [35S]GTP
S were separated by
filtration with GF/B filters. Radioactivity on filters was determined
by liquid scintillation counting. The results were expressed as
(
)U50,488H-stimulated [35S]GTP
S binding in
femtomoles per milligram of protein with the basal binding subtracted.
EC50 values and maximal responses
(Emax) of the drug were determined by curve
fitting to the equation for a sigmoidal curve E = (Emax / [1 + ([D] /
EC50)n]) + basal level,
where E is effect produced by a certain concentration of the
drug, [D], Emax is the maximal
response elicited by the drug, and n is a fitting parameter.
Transient Expression of GRKs and Arrestins in CHO-Flag-rkor Cells
and GRK2-K220R in CHO-Flag-hkor Cells.
CHO-Flag-rkor cells were
transiently transfected with 4 µg of GRK2/100-mm dish in pcDNA3.1
Zeo(+) plus 4 µg of arrestin-2/100-mm dish in pcDNA 3.1 Zeo(+), 4 µg of GRK3/100-mm dish in pcDNA 3 plus 4 µg of arrestin-3/100-mm
dish in pcDNA 3, or 4 µg/100-mm dish each of GRK2 and GRK3
(Sterne-Marr and Benovic, 1995
, and references therein) or the vectors
by using LipofectAMINE (50 µl) following the manufacturer's
instructions. CHO-Flag-hkor cells were similarly transfected with 8 µg of GRK2-K220R/100-mm dish (Kong et al., 1994
) in pcDNA3.1 Zeo(+).
Forty-eight to 72 h after transfection, cells were used for
desensitization or phosphorylation experiments.
Phosphorylation of the Wild-Type, Chimeric, and Mutant
-Opioid
Receptors.
Phosphorylation was conducted according to a procedure
we described previously (Carman et al., 2000
). CHO cells stably
expressing each construct were transferred from 100-mm dishes into
6-well plates and cultured overnight to confluence. Cells were then
grown in 1 ml/well phosphate-free medium and incubated at 37°C for
2 h. [32P]orthophosphate (0.25 mCi/well)
was added and incubated for another 2 h and medium was aspirated.
Cells were incubated without or with 1 µM (
)U50,488H for an
indicated period of time at 37°C, cooled on ice, and washed three
times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. All subsequent steps
were carried out at 4°C. Cells were solubilized for at least 1 h
with solubilization buffer [2% digitonin, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate,
2 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 20 nM calyculin A,
and a protease inhibitor cocktail (5 µg/ml antipain dihydrochloride,
0.2 µg/ml aprotinin, 4 µg/ml bestatin, 0.6 µg/ml chymostatin,
0.05 µg/ml E-64, 0.02 mg/ml EDTA, 0.01 mg/ml Pefabloc SC, 0.07 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 µg/ml phosphoramidon, and 0.05 µg/ml
leupeptin)] and centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 h. Immunoprecipitation of the wild-type and mutant rkor and hkor was
performed with a specific polyclonal antibody against Flag followed by
Pansorbin (final 1/200, 4°C, 1 h) according to a modified procedure of Luthin et al. (1988)
. The mixture was centrifuged and the
pellets were washed three times by centrifugation and resuspension.
Immunoprecipitated materials were dissolved in 2× Lammeli sample
buffer and subjected to 7 or 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(Chen et al., 1995
) and autoradiography.
Western Blot.
Western blot was performed to examine the
expression of the Flag-tagged wild-type and mutant rkor and hkor
proteins as described previously (Li et al., 2001
). Briefly, stably
transfected CHO cells or membranes were treated as indicated,
solubilized with Laemmli sample buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and
transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Nitrocellulose membranes
were treated with blocking solution, incubated with a rabbit polyclonal
antibody against Flag and then goat anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG
conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, reacted with enhanced
chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents, and exposed to
X-ray films.
Construction of Flag-Tagged Wild-Type, Chimeric, and Mutant Receptors. Correct generations of all constructs were confirmed by DNA sequence determination.
Flag Tag Fragment.
An ~130-bp fragment containing a signal
peptide and the Flag tag sequence was excised with HindIII
and NcoI from a construct of Flag-tagged
2-adrenergic receptor in pcDNA3, with
Flag-tagged 5' to the initiation codon (Guan et al., 1992
).
Flag-Tagged hkor (Flag-hkor).
The Flag tag fragment was
inserted 5' to the Met start codon, and Flag-hkor inserted in
HindIII and XbaI sites of vector pcDNA3 was
generated previously (Xu et al., 2000
).
Flag-Tagged rkor (Flag-rkor).
The fragment containing the
coding region and a short 3'-noncoding region of the rkor was generated
by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the NcoI-RK (ATC
ACC ATG GAG TCC CCC ATC) and RK-NotI (TAT GCG GCC GCA CCA
AGA TCA TTG AAC TC) as primers and the rkor in pcDNA3 (Li et al., 1993
)
as the template. The resulting PCR product was treated with
NcoI and NotI. The
HindIII/NcoI-generated ~130-bp Flag fragment
and the NcoI/NotI-treated PCR product (1.3 kilobases) were ligated into HindIII and NotI
sites of the vector pcDNA3 to generate the Flag-rkor.
Flag-Tagged hkor1-338/rkor339-380 (Flag-h/rkor).
This
chimera combined the fragment of the N terminus to the end of TM7 of
the hkor with the C-terminal domain of the rkor (see Fig. 5) with the
overlap PCR method (Higuchi et al., 1988
). The hkor and rkor have the
same nucleotide sequence (GCC TTT CTT GAT GAA AAC TTC AAG)
corresponding to
331AFLDENFK338 at the end
of TM7 and the beginning of C-terminal domain. Sense and antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to the amino acids 331-338 were
synthesized for use as primers. The fragment of the hkor(N
terminus-TM7) was generated by PCR using the NcoI-HK (ATC
ACC ATG GAC TCC CCG ATC) and the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide for
amino acids 331-338 as primers and the hkor in pBK/CMV
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA; Zhu et al., 1995
) as the template. The
rkor(C-terminal domain) was produced by PCR using the sense
oligodeoxynucleotide (for amino acids 331-338) and RK-NotI
(TAT GCG GCC GCA CCA AGA TCA TTG AAC TC) as primers and the rkor in
pcDNA3 (Li et al., 1993
) as the template. Overlap PCR was performed
with the hkor(N terminus-TM7) and the rkor(C-terminal domain) as the
templates and NcoI-HK and RK-NotI as primers. The
resulting PCR product was treated with NcoI and
NotI. The HindIII/NcoI-generated
~130-bp Flag tag fragment and the
NcoI/NotI-treated PCR product [hkor(N terminus-TM7)/rkor(C-terminal domain)] were ligated into
HindIII and NotI sites of the vector pcDNA3 to
generate the chimera construct.
Flag-Tagged rkor1-338/hkor339-380 (Flag-r/hkor).
This
chimera contains the fragments of the rkor(N terminus-TM7) and the
hkor(C-terminal domain) (see Fig. 5). The rkor(N terminus-TM7) fragment
was generated by PCR using the NcoI-RK primer (ATC ACC ATG GAG TCC CCC
ATC) and the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (for amino acids 331-338)
as primers and the rkor in pcDNA3 (Li et al., 1993
) as the template.
The hkor(C-terminal domain) was produced by PCR using the sense
oligodeoxynucleotide (for amino acids 331-338) and HK-NotI
primer (TAT GCGGCC GCA GTG ATC TGA GTT AAA CC) as primers and the hkor
in pBK/CMV (Zhu et al., 1995
) as the template. Overlap PCR was
performed with the rkor(N terminus-TM7) and hkor(C-terminal domain) as
the templates and NcoI-RK and NotI-HK as primers.
The resulting PCR product was treated with NcoI and
NotI. The HindIII/NcoI-generated ~130-bp Flag tag fragment and the
NcoI/NotI-treated PCR product [rkor(N
terminus-TM7)/hkor(C-terminal domain)] were ligated into HindIII and NotI sites of the vector pcDNA3 to
generate the chimera construct.
S358N Mutant of the Flag-hkor (Flag-hkorS358N).
S358N
mutation was introduced into the Flag-hkor (see Fig. 5) with the
overlap PCR method (Higuchi et al., 1988
) and primers with point
mutations. The fragment of hkor(N terminus to 358N) was generated by
PCR using the NcoI-HK and the antisense of AGA GCA CTA
ACA GAG TCC CG (the point mutation is underlined) as
primers and the hkor in pBK/CMV (Zhu et al., 1995
) as the template. The fragment of 358N to the 3'-noncoding region was generated by PCR using
the sense sequence of AGA GCA CTA ACA GAG TCC CG and
HK-NotI as primers and the hkor in pBK/CMV (Zhu et al.,
1995
) as the template. Overlap PCR was performed with the
NcoI-HK and the HK-NotI as primers and two
fragments as the template. The resulting PCR product (hkor-S358N) was
treated with NcoI and NotI. The
HindIII/NcoI-generated ~130-bp Flag tag
fragment and the NcoI/NotI-treated PCR product (hkor-S358N) were ligated into HindIII and NotI
sites of the vector pcDNA3 to generate the Flag-hkorS358N.
N358S Mutant of the Flag-rkor (Flag-rkorN358S). N358S mutation was introduced into the Flag-rkor (see Fig. 5). The fragments of Flag-rkor (5'-noncoding region to 358S) was generated by PCR using CTG GCT AAC TAG AGA ACC (the pcDNA3 5' primer) and antisense of CAG AGC ACA AGC AGA GTT AGA (the point mutation is underlined) as primers and the Flag-rkor in pcDNA3 as the template. The fragment of 358S to the 3'-noncoding region was generated by PCR using the sense sequence of CAG AGC ACA AGC AGA GTT AGA and GGC AAA CAA CAG ATG GCT GGC AAC TA (the pcDNA3 3' primer) as primers and the Flag-rkor as the template. Overlap PCR was performed with the 5' primer and the 3' primer and two PCR fragments as the template. The resulting PCR product was treated with EcoRI and NotI. The HindIII/EcoRI-generated fragment containing the Flag fragment and part of the rkor (~500 bp) from Flag-rkor in pcDNA3 and the EcoRI/NotI-treated PCR product were ligated into HindIII and NotI sites of the vector pcDNA3 to generate the Flag-rkorN358S.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Determination of Kd and
Bmax Values of
[3H]Diprenorphine Binding to the Wild-Type and
Flag-Tagged Wild-Type, Chimeric, and Mutant
-Opioid Receptors.
Each of the constructs hkor, rkor, Flag-hkor, Flag-rkor, Flag-h/rkor,
Flag-r/hkor, Flag-hkorS358N, and Flag-rkorN358S was stably expressed in
CHO cells. Clonal cell lines for each construct were established. Cell
lines that expressed 1 to 3 pmol of receptor/mg of protein were
selected. Saturation binding of
[3H]diprenorphine to one clonal cell line of
each receptor in membranes was performed and
Kd and Bmax
values were determined. All chimeras and mutants displayed similar
affinities for the antagonist [3H]diprenorphine
as the wild types, with Kd values ranging
from 0.08 to 0.13 nM (Table 1),
indicating that binding pockets of the chimeras and mutants do not
differ significantly from those of the wild types. The
Bmax values ranged from 1.00 to 2.74 pmol/mg of protein (Table 1).
|
Differences in (
)U50,488H-Induced Desensitization between the
hkor and the rkor.
Pretreatment of CHO-hkor cells with 1 µM
(
)U50,488H for 60 min significantly reduced (
)U50,488H-stimulated
[35S]GTP
S binding (Fig.
1A; Table
2). Dose-response curve of (
)U50,488H was shifted downward and rightward. The EC50 of
(
)U50,488H was significantly increased and maximal
[35S]GTP
S binding was decreased, compared
with the control. In contrast, the same pretreatment did not reduce
responsiveness of the rkor (Fig. 1B; Table 2). Neither the
EC50 nor the maximal
[35S]GTP
S binding of (
)U50,488H was
changed significantly. There were no significant differences in basal
[35S]GTP
S binding between the control and
(
)U50,488H-treated CHO-hkor or CHO-rkor cells. These results indicate
that there is a difference in agonist-induced desensitization between
the hkor and the rkor expressed in CHO cells.
|
|
)U50-488H-induced desensitization were observed between the Flag-hkor and the Flag-rkor stably transfected into CHO cells (Fig. 1, C and D; Table 2), indicating that the presence of the Flag sequence did not influence desensitization properties of the hkor and the rkor after exposure to
(
)U50,488H. The Flag tag did not significantly affect the EC50 and Emax values
of (
)U50,488H in stimulating [35S]GTP
S
binding. There were no significant differences in basal [35S]GTP
S binding between the control and
(
)U50,488H-treated CHO-Flag-hkor or CHO-Flag-rkor cells. We examined
three clone cell lines each for the Flag-hkor and the Flag-rkor, and
they yielded similar results.
Differences in (
)U50,488H-Promoted Phosphorylation between the
Flag-hkor and the Flag-rkor.
The difference between the hkor and
the rkor in (
)U50,488H-induced desensitization may be due to
differential (
)U50,488H-promoted phosphorylation of the receptors. We
thus examined receptor phosphorylation after exposure to (
)U50,488H.
Treatment with (
)U50,488H for 15 min enhanced phosphorylation of the
Flag-hkor, but not the Flag-rkor (Fig.
2A), although both receptors were
expressed well as determined by Western blot (Fig. 2B). Increasing
pretreatment time to 30 or 60 min neither affected the degree of
phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor appreciably nor enhanced
phosphorylation of the Flag-rkor (Fig. 2A). Two clone cell lines each
of the Flag-hkor and the Flag-rkor were examined and they yielded
similar results. Therefore, we assessed (
)U50,488H-induced
phosphorylation at 15 min in subsequent experiments unless indicated
otherwise. Phosphorylated Flag-hkor appeared as a broad and diffuse
band with a molecular mass range of 52 to 63 kDa and the median of 58 kDa (Fig. 2A), indicating that it is a glycoprotein.
|
)U50,488H-promoted phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor was blocked by
the antagonist naloxone (Fig. 2A), indicating that receptor activation
is required. Expression of the dominant negative mutant GRK2-K220R
reduced U50,488H-induced phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor, demonstrating that the phosphorylation is GRK-mediated (Fig. 2C).
Effects of Expression of GRK2 and Arrestin-2 or GRK3 and Arrestin-3
on Response of the Flag-rkor to (
)U50,488H Pretreatment.
The
inability of the Flag-rkor to undergo desensitization and
phosphorylation may be due to insufficient amounts of GRKs and arrestins present in cells. We thus examined whether expression of GRK2
and arrestin-2 or GRK3 and arrestin-3 had any effects. Transfection
efficiency was about 60% as determined by transfection with a green
fluorescent protein construct. There was no (
)U50,488H-induced desensitization of the Flag-rkor in cells transfected with GRK2 and
arrestin-2 or GRK3 and arrestin-3, similar to cells transfected with
the vector pcDNA3 or pcDNA3.1Zeo(+) (Fig.
3). In addition, expression of GRK2 and
GRK3 did not increase the extent of phosphorylation of the Flag-rkor
after (
)U50,488H treatment (Fig. 4A),
nor did expression of GRK2 or GRK3 alone (data not shown). As a
positive control, although morphine only slightly enhanced
phosphorylation of the rat µ-opioid receptor (rmor) in CHO cells,
expression of GRK2 and GRK3 greatly enhanced morphine-promoted
phosphorylation (Fig. 4B), similar to what Zhang et al. (1998)
and we
(Carman et al., 2000
) reported. There results indicate that the failure of the Flag-rkor to undergo (
)U50,488H-induced desensitization and
phosphorylation is not due to low levels of GRKs and arrestins.
|
|
Role of the C-Terminal Domain of the
-Opioid Receptor in
(
)U50,488H-Induced Desensitization and Phosphorylation.
The
amino acid sequences of intracellular regions of the rkor and the hkor
are highly homologous with only some differences in the C-terminal
domain (Fig. 5). To understand the
molecular basis of the differences in (
)U50,488H-induced
desensitization and phosphorylation between the hkor and the rkor, we
constructed two Flag-tagged chimeric receptors, Flag-h/rkor
[Flag-hkor(1-338)/rkor(339-380)] and Flag-r/hkor
[Flag-rkor(1-338)/hkor(339-380)], in which the C-terminal domains
were swapped. Unlike the rkor or the Flag-rkor, the Flag-r/hkor
expressed stably in CHO cells underwent (
)U50,488H-promoted desensitization (Fig. 6A; Table 2). The
dose-response curve of (
)U50,488H was shifted downward and rightward
with its EC50 value increased by ~7-fold, and
the maximal [35S]GTP
S binding decreased by
~30%, compared with the control. In contrast to the hkor and the
Flag-hkor, the Flag-h/rkor pretreated with (
)U50,488H did not exhibit
significant desensitization and neither the
Emax value nor the
EC50 was changed significantly compared with
those of the control (Fig. 6A; Table 2). There were no significant
differences in basal [35S]GTP
S binding
between the control and (
)U50,488H-treated CHO-Flag-h/rkor or
CHO-Flag-r/hkor cells. In addition, (
)U50,488H enhanced
phosphorylation of the Flag-r/hkor but not the Flag-h/rkor (Fig. 6B),
although both constructs were expressed to apparent similar extents
(Fig. 6B). Experiments were performed on two and three clonal cell
lines of the Flag-r/hkor and the Flag-h/rkor, respectively, with
similar results. These results demonstrate that the C-terminal domain plays a crucial role in the observed species differences.
|
|
Role of the 358 Residues in the C-Terminal Domains of the hkor and
the rkor in (
)U50,488H-Induced Desensitization and
Phosphorylation.
Comparison of the C-terminal domain amino acid
sequences between the hkor and the rkor reveals that only seven
residues are different (Fig. 5). One notable difference is the locus
358, where it is Ser in the hkor, but Asn in the rkor. Because GRKs,
which are Ser/Thr kinases, have been implicated in (
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor, we constructed two mutants, Flag-hkor-S358N and Flag-rkor-N358S, to further delineate the molecular
basis of the observed species differences.
)U50,488H did not
induce desensitization of the mutant (Fig.
7A; Table 2). In contrast, preincubation
of CHO-Flag-rkorN358S cells with (
)U50,488H caused profound
desensitization (Fig. 7A; Table 2). The
Emax was reduced by ~30% with no
significant change in EC50. There were no
significant differences in basal [35S]GTP
S
binding between the control and (
)U50,488H-treated Flag-hkorS358N or
Flag-rkorN358S cells. In addition, although S358N mutation in the
Flag-hkor completely abolished (
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation, (
)U50,488H only slightly increased phosphorylation of the N358S mutant of the Flag-rkor (Fig. 7B). (
)U50,488H treatment did not seem
to affect the amount of either receptor protein, as detected by Western
blot. Extending the U50,488H treatment period from 15 min to 30 or 60 min did not increase the extent of phosphorylation of the
Flag-rkorN358S (data not shown). Both receptor constructs were
expressed well (Fig. 7B). Experiments were performed on two clonal cell
lines each of the Flag-hkorS358N and the Flag-rkorN358S with similar
results. These results indicate that the S358 in C-terminal domain of
the hkor plays a key role in conferring the ability to undergo
(
)U50,488H-induced desensitization and phosphorylation.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have shown that after exposure to
(
)U50,488H, the hkor and the Flag-hkor were desensitized and the Flag-hkor was phosphorylated. In contrast, the rkor and the Flag-rkor were not desensitized and the Flag-rkor was not phosphorylated. The
C-terminal domains contribute to, and the 358 locus plays a
nonexclusive role in, the differences in desensitization and phosphorylation between the hkor and the rkor. To the best of our
knowledge, this study represents the first demonstration of such
species difference in the regulation of GPCRs. In addition, this study
provides first evidence for the importance of Ser-358 in
(
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the hkor.
Desensitization and Phosphorylation of the hkor and the
Flag-hkor.
The hkor and the Flag-hkor were readily desensitized by
(
)U50,488H pretreatment. This finding is consistent with our previous report (Zhu et al., 1998
) and those of Blake et al. (1997)
and Ling et
al. (1998)
.
)U50,488H enhanced phosphorylation
of the Flag-hkor, which was blocked by the antagonist naloxone, indicating that receptor activation is required for phosphorylation. A
longer incubation time (30 min or 60 min) did not seem to increase the
degree of phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor. We have previously shown
that significant desensitization of the hkor is observed after a 15-min
incubation with 1 µM (
)U50,488H (Zhu et al., 1998
)U50,488H led to a slightly higher extent
of desensitization of the hkor with no change in receptor number (Zhu
et al., 1998
-opioid
receptor had a molecular mass of 53 kDa. The hkor used in this study
was epitope-tagged with Flag, which added about 1 kDa to the molecular mass.
Expression of the dominant negative mutant GRK2-K220R reduced
(
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor, indicating that
phosphorylation is mediated by GRKs. These results are in accord with
our previous reports. We have shown previously that expression of
dominant negative mutants of GRK2 and arrestin-2 reduces
(
)U50,488H-promoted internalization and down-regulation of the hkor
(Li et al., 1999Lack of Desensitization and Phosphorylation of the rkor and the
Flag-rkor.
A 1-h incubation with 1 µM (
)U50,488H did not cause
desensitization of the rkor and the Flag-rkor (see Fig. 1), and
treatment of the Flag-rkor with 1 µM (
)U50,488H for 15 min, 30 min,
or 1 h did not enhance phosphorylation (see Fig. 2). Our results that the rkor and Flag-rkor were not desensitized by (
)U50,488H are
similar to reports by Joseph and Bidlack (1995)
and Avidor-Reiss et al.
(1995)
, who showed that treatment with (
)U50,488H or U69,593 did not
cause desensitization of the mouse
-receptor in R1.1 thymoma cells
or the rkor stably expressed in CHO cells. There findings are also in
accord with our previous observations that the rkor was not
internalized or down-regulated by (
)U50,488H pretreatment (Li et al.,
1999
, 2000
). In contrast, Tallent et al. (1998)
reported that
(
)U50,488H pretreatment caused desensitization of mouse
-opioid
receptor expressed in AtT-20 cells, with inhibition of adenylate
cyclase and increase in K+ current as functional
measures. The discrepancy among these results may be due to different
cell systems and functional endpoints used.
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation of
the Flag-rkor may be due to inability of the Flag antibody to
immunoprecipitate the Flag-rkor because of glycosylation in the
N-terminal domain. This seems not to be the case, because the Flag
antibody could immunoprecipitate the Flag-r/hkor (see Fig. 6B), which
has the identical N-terminal domain and a similar molecular mass range,
indicating similar degree of glycosylation as the Flag-rkor. In
addition, the lack of (
)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation was not
because the Flag-rkor was not expressed on the cell surface, because
about 85% of total receptors are extracellular (Li et al., 1999
)U50,488H stimulation for 15 or 60 min, the
Flag-rkorY345C mutant was not phosphorylated (data not shown), similar
to the Flag-rkor, indicating that the difference in the 345 position
did not have effect on lack of (
)U50,488-induced phosphorylation of
Flag-rkor.
The lack of desensitization and phosphorylation of the Flag-rkor by
(
)U50,488H may be due to insufficient levels of GRKs and arrestins
for the Flag-rkor to undergo these processes, even though the levels
seem to be sufficient for the Flag-hkor. Chavkin and colleagues
(Appleyard et al., 1999
)U50,488H, using K+ currents as the
endpoint, but expression of GRK3 or GRK5 and arrestin-3 greatly
increased the extent of desensitization. Zhang et al. (1998)
)U50,488H, did not promote internalization of the
hkor and expression of GRK2 and arrestin-2 permitted etorphine to
induce internalization (Li et al., 1999
)U50,488H exposure, indicating
that the lack of desensitization and phosphorylation of the Flag-rkor is not the result of insufficient GRKs and arrestins. The differences between our results and those of Appleyard et al. (1999)
S binding, these researchers used
X. laevis oocytes and K+ currents.
Such a lack of effect of GRK2 is not without precedent. Morphine did
not elicit phosphorylation or internalization of the
-opioid
receptor or stimulate
-arrestin translocation and expression of GRK2
did not have any effect (Zhang et al., 1999Desensitization and Phosphorylation of Chimeric and Mutant
Receptors.
Pretreatment of CHO-Flag-r/hkor cells with (
)U50,488H
resulted in desensitization and enhanced phosphorylation. In contrast, Flag-h/rkor did not undergo desensitization and phosphorylation after
exposure to (
)U50,488H. The results demonstrate that differences in
the C-terminal domain contribute to the difference in
(
)U50,488H-induced desensitization and phosphorylation between the
hkor and the rkor.
)U50,488H-induced desensitization and phosphorylation. In contrast, the N358S
substitution in the rkor enabled the rkor to be desensitized by
(
)U50,488H, but the agonist only slightly increased phosphorylation.
These results indicate the role of S358 of the hkor in these processes and its contribution to the difference between the hkor and the rkor.
Our results that S358N mutation of the hkor abolished U50,488H-induced
desensitization and phosphorylation are consistent with those of Cheng
et al. (1998)
S binding and inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. S356A/T357G/S358G or
S356A/T357G/S358G/T363A mutation abolished the modulatory effect of
arrestin-2, but T363A mutation had no effect, indicating that
S356/T357/S358 play an important role in the arrestin-2 effect.
However, no phosphorylation was performed in their study.
Two interpretations are likely for the observation that S358N mutation
in the Flag-hkor abolished (
)U50,488H-promoted phosphorylation and
desensitization. One possibility is that Ser-358 is the phosphorylation site. The other is that S358N substitution changes the conformation of
the C-terminal domain, thus abolishing phosphorylation. Further studies
are required to distinguish the two possibilities. The 358 locus in the
guinea pig
-opioid receptor is Ser (Xie et al., 1994
-opioid receptor in the guinea pig hippocampal
slices was desensitized and phosphorylated (Appleyard et al., 1997Differences in (
)U50,488H-Promoted Phosphorylation and
Desensitization between the Flag-r/hkor and the Flag-rkorN358S.
(
)U50,488H enhanced phosphorylation of the Flag-r/hkor to a
much greater extent than the Flag-rkorN358S mutant. In addition, during
(
)U50,488H-induced desensitization of the Flag-r/hkor or the
Flag-hkor, there were an increase in EC50 and a
decrease in Emax, whereas desensitization
of the Flag-rkorN358S involved a decrease in
Emax with no change in
EC50. Thus, sequence differences in the
C-terminal domain, besides the S versus N at the 358 locus, also
contribute to the differences between the hkor and the rkor. The
dissimilarity between the sequences may lead to conformational differences of the C-terminal domain between the hkor and the rkor,
which in turn lead to differential interactions of GRKs with this region.
Correlation between Phosphorylation and Desensitization.
The
Flag-hkor and Flag-r/hkor underwent (
)U50,488H-promoted
phosphorylation and desensitization, but the Flag-rkor, Flag-h/rkor, and Flag-hkorS358N did not. Thus, there seems to be a correlation between phosphorylation and desensitization, which is consistent with
studies on other GPCRs (for review, see Krupnick and Benovic, 1998
).
However, the N358S mutant of the Flag-rkor gained the ability to
desensitize in response to (
)U50,488H, yet the agonist only slightly
increased phosphorylation of this mutant. It has been demonstrated that
arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 can bind to both phosphorylated and
nonphosphorylated GPCRs, but with higher affinities for phosphorylated states of GPCRs (for review, see Krupnick and Benovic, 1998
). Unphosphorylated mutants of GPCRs have been shown to undergo
agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. For instance, a
-opioid receptor mutant truncated at 344, which lacks all Ser and
Thr residues in the C-terminal domain, was not phosphorylated, but was
able to undergo dynamin- and arrestin-2-dependent internalization in
HEK293 cells (Murray et al., 1998
).
Effect of (
)U50,488H Pretreatment on Basal
[35S]GTP
S Binding.
(
)U50,488H pretreatment
followed by extensive washing did not change basal
[35S]GTP
S binding of any of the wild-type,
chimeric, or mutant
-opioid receptors. This is different from a
recent report by Liu and Prather (2001)
showing that agonist treatment
of cells expressing the µ-opioid receptor exhibited enhanced basal
activity. The reason for the discrepancy is unclear. Perhaps different
receptors react differently to chronic agonist treatment.
Role of the C-terminal Domains of the rkor and the hkor in
(
)U50,488H-Induced [35S]GTP
S Binding.
It is
interesting to note that the receptor constructs that contain the
C-terminal domain of the rkor, such as rkor, Flag-rkor, and
Flag-h/rkor, have lower maximal [35S]GTP
S
binding than those that have the C-terminal domain of the hkor, such as
hkor, Flag-hkor and Flag-r/hkor, despite comparable or even higher
expression levels (see Table 2). Thus, in addition to playing a
critical role in the differential (
)U50,488H-promoted desensitization
and phosphorylation between the rkor and the hkor, the C-terminal
domains may be an important determinant in the relative degree of
U50,488H-promoted [35S]GTP
S binding. These
two observations may be related in that [35S]GTP
S binding reflects G protein
activation, which leads to activation of GRK2 and GRK3 via the

-subunits. Therefore, the rkor may be a weaker activator of GRKs
than the hkor.
Adaptation to Agonist Exposure.
Desensitization,
internalization, and down-regulation are processes that cells use to
adapt to prolonged activation of GPCRs by agonists. In addition to lack
of desensitization, the rkor expressed in CHO cells was not
internalized or down-regulated after exposure to (
)U50,488H or
etorphine (Li et al., 1999
, 2000
). In contrast, the hkor underwent
internalization and down-regulation. Thus, during prolonged activation,
the rkor will be constantly stimulated, which may lead to more profound
changes of downstream signal transduction pathways to maintain
homeostasis. von Zastrow and colleagues (Whistler et al., 1999
)
postulated that these downstream adaptive changes may contribute to the
development of tolerance and lack of receptor internalization may lead
to a higher degree of downstream adaptive changes. Whether this
scenario is true needs further investigations.
| |
Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have demonstrated that the hkor, but not the rkor, stably
expressed in CHO cells undergoes U50,488H-promoted desensitization and
phosphorylation and the C-terminal domain contributes to, and the 358 locus has a role in, the differences. Our results suggest that one
should exercise caution when extrapolating results on regulation of
-opioid receptors from the rat to the human.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. Jeffrey L. Benovic (Thomas Jefferson University
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA) for the cDNA constructs of
Flag-tagged
2-adrenergic receptor, GRK2,
GRK2-K220R, GRK3, arrestin-2, and arrestin-3.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 13, 2001; Accepted September 27, 2001
This work was supported by National Institute of Health grants DA04745 and DA11263.
J. L. and J.-G.L. contributed equally to this work.
Dr. Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen, Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, 3420 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail: lliuche{at}astro.temple.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
GRK, G
protein-coupled receptor kinase;
hkor, human
-opioid receptor;
rkor, rat
-opioid receptor;
(
)U50,488H, (
)(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide;
U69,593, (5
,7
,8
)-(+)-N-methyl-N-(7-[1-pyrrolidinyl]-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-8-yl)benzeneacetamide;
GTP
S, guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate);
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
bp, base pair(s);
CHO, Chinese
hamster ovary;
Flag-hkor, Flag-tagged human
-opioid receptor;
Flag-h/rkor, Flag-tagged chimera of human
-opioid receptor
1-338/rat
-opioid receptor 339-380;
Flag-hkorS358N, S358N mutant of the Flag-tagged human
-opioid receptor;
Flag-rkor, Flag-tagged rat
-opioid receptor;
Flag-r/hkor, Flag-tagged chimera
of rat
-opioid receptor 1-338/human
-opioid receptor
339-380;
Flag-rkorN358S, N358S mutant of the Flag-tagged rat
-opioid receptor;
rmor, the rat µ-opioid receptor;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|