MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. B.

Vol. 61, Issue 2, 463-472, February 2002


Mapping the Agonist Binding Site of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor by Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis: Antagonist Footprint and Secondary Structure Prediction

Deirdre Sullivan, David C. Chiara, and Jonathan B. Cohen

Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

To further define the surface of the Torpedo californica nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) contributing to the agonist binding site structure, we used the substituted Cys accessibility method to identify novel residues and determined the "footprint" of residues protected from modification by the reversible competitive antagonist d-tubocurarine (dTC). nAChRs containing single Cys substitutions within regions of the alpha - or gamma -subunit primary structure known to contribute to the agonist binding site were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Cys substitutions in binding site segments A (alpha Tyr-93 and alpha Asn-94), C (alpha Tyr-198), and D (gamma Glu-57) had been shown previously to be accessible for modification. We now introduced cysteines from alpha Asp-195 to alpha Ile-201 and from gamma Ala-106 to gamma Asp-113 and identified positions accessible for modification in segments C (alpha Asp-195, alpha Thr-196, alpha Pro-197, alpha Asp-200, and alpha Ile-201) and E (gamma Asn-107 and gamma Leu-109). dTC protected against alkylation in segments D (gamma Glu-57) and E (gamma Leu-109) but not in segment A (alpha Tyr-93 and alpha Asn-94). In segment C, dTC protection experiments revealed a pattern in which every other residue (alpha 196, alpha 198, and alpha 200, but not alpha 197 or alpha 201) was protected from alkylation. This pattern of protection provides evidence that bound dTC is near amino acids in segments C, D, and E but not in segment A, and identifies a beta -strand surface within segment C contributing to the binding site. These results are discussed in terms of a homology model, based on the molluscan acetylcholine binding protein crystal structure, of the T. californica nAChR agonist binding site.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The binding sites for agonists and competitive antagonists in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) are within the extracellular domain at the alpha -gamma and alpha -delta subunit interfaces. Affinity labeling and mutagenesis studies have provided extensive evidence for a model of the agonist site structure with contributing amino acids from three distinct regions of the alpha -subunits (referred to as binding site segments A, B, and C) and from at least three regions of the gamma  (or delta )-subunit (segments D, E, and F) (reviewed in Prince and Sine, 1998; Arias, 2000; Corringer et al., 2000). Most features of the model are present in the binding site identified within the recently solved structure of a molluscan, glial-derived soluble ACh binding protein (AChBP), a homopentameric structural and functional homolog of the N-terminal ligand binding domain of a nAChR alpha -subunit (Brejc et al., 2001; Smit et al., 2001).

The substituted Cys accessibility method (Karlin and Akabas, 1998) has provided an alternative approach for characterizing structural features of the nAChR and other ion channels. An observed irreversible change in the functional properties of the channel, after exposure to a water-soluble sulfhydryl reagent, suggests that the substituted Cys is exposed at the water accessible protein surface. This technique has been used to identify the state-dependent accessibility of amino acids contributing to the ion conduction pathway of the nAChR (Akabas et al., 1994; Akabas and Karlin, 1995; Zhang and Karlin, 1997, 1998). In studies of the structure of the agonist binding site, which contains a disulfide bond between alpha Cys-192/193 in segment C, most Cys substitutions are well tolerated within alpha 184-198 and are accessible for modification (McLaughlin et al., 1995; Spura et al., 1999; Spura et al., 2000). Using Cys mutagenesis of Torpedo californica nAChR, we previously tested the accessibility of positions identified by affinity labeling and mutagenesis in segments A (alpha Tyr-93), B (alpha Trp-149), C (alpha Tyr-190 and alpha Tyr-198), and D (gamma Trp-55 and gamma Glu-57) as well as surrounding amino acids in segments A (alpha 90-96) and D (gamma 52-58) and found that alpha Tyr-93, alpha Asn-94, alpha Tyr-198, and gamma Glu-57 were accessible (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). That study also helped to define the structural requirements for ligand orientation compatible with nAChR activation, as [2-(trimethylammonium)-ethyl]-methanethiosulfonate (MTSET), which attaches thiocholine, acted as an irreversible antagonist at positions alpha Y93C and gamma E57C but as a covalent agonist at alpha Y198C. Furthermore, a structural analog with the tethering arm shortened by one methylene group (0.7 Å) acted as an irreversible antagonist at alpha Y198C and at all other accessible positions.

In this report, we extended these studies by identifying additional accessible residues in segment C (alpha 195-201) as well as segment E (gamma 106-113), which includes residues identified by photoaffinity labeling with the antagonists [3H]4-benzoylbenzoylcholine (gamma Leu-109; Wang et al., 2000) and [3H]d-tubocurarine (dTC) (gamma Tyr-111; Chiara et al., 1999). With these mutant nAChRs, we also tested whether MTSET or its analogs could act as irreversible agonists when tethered at positions other than alpha Y198C. In addition, we used the panel of nAChR binding site mutants containing accessible cysteines to identify positions that could be protected from alkylation when the agonist binding site was occupied by dTC. Based upon photoaffinity labeling, [3H]dTC binds to the agonist site at the alpha -gamma interface near amino acids in segments C (alpha Tyr-190, alpha Cys-192, and alpha Tyr-198), D (gamma Trp-55), and E (gamma Tyr-111 and gamma Tyr-117; Chiara and Cohen, 1997; Chiara et al., 1999), and dTC can protect against MTSET reaction at alpha Y198C (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). The results we now report, which indicate protection of alkylation of positions in segments C, D, and E but not in segment A, are consistent with the results of photoaffinity labeling. The pattern of protected residues within segment C indicates that this region is organized as a beta -strand and identifies a surface projecting toward the ACh binding site consistent with the structure of the binding site in the AChBP (Brejc et al., 2001). However, the lack of protection of alpha Y93C is surprising in terms of that structure. Our experimental results are compared with a homology model of the T. californica agonist binding site based on the crystal structure of the AChBP and are generally consistent with this structure. However, the accessibility of some residues suggests differences between the model and the structure of the T. californica nAChR binding site in the absence of agonist (our experimental conditions).

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

cDNA Mutagenesis. Mutants were constructed by "overlap extension" PCR using T. californica nAChR subunit plasmids (alpha , gamma , and delta  in pMXT and beta  in pSP64) and reagents as described previously (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). The mutations of amino acids 195-201 of the mature alpha -subunit were generated using primers which gave a PCR product of ~1000 base pairs that could be subcloned using the unique BsiWI restriction site and the BbvII site near the 3' end of the alpha -subunit coding region. Mutations of amino acids 106 to 113 in the mature gamma -subunit were made by generating a PCR product of ~1.13 kilobases that was subcloned using the unique HindIII site in the vector and the StuI site in the gamma -subunit coding region. Each PCR mix contained 0.5 µM primers, 50 ng of template DNA, and 0.4 mM dNTPs in the reaction buffer supplied with the enzyme. PCR reactions were for 24 cycles with a three-step protocol (1.5 min at 95°C, 45°C, and 72°C).

Electrophysiology. T. californica nAChR subunit-specific cRNAs were transcribed in vitro and Xenopus laevis oocytes were injected as described previously (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). Isolated, follicle-free oocytes were injected with 0.5 to 10 ng of subunit-specific RNAs in a molar ratio of 2alpha /beta /gamma /delta , and currents elicited by ACh were measured 48 to 72 h after injection by two-electrode voltage clamp. Under our experimental conditions, for oocytes injected with 0.5 ng of wild-type nAChR subunit cRNAs, maximal current responses for ACh were typically 1 to 2 µA. For the Cys substitutions between alpha 195 and alpha 201 in segment C, the maximal current responses for ACh were similar to wild-type for the mutant nAChRs containing Cys at alpha 195, alpha 196, alpha 197, or alpha 199. As described previously, the alpha Y198C nAChRs showed maximal current levels ~1% of wild-type, and for the alpha D200C and alpha I201C mutant nAChRs, the maximal currents were also 1 to 5% of wild-type. For alpha Y198C, as judged by binding of 125I-alpha -bungarotoxin to intact oocytes, surface nAChR levels were ~50% of wild-type. Within segment E (gamma 106-113), the maximal ACh current responses were similar to wild-type for each substitution except for gamma Y111C, which had maximal responses ~2% of wild-type and surface nAChR levels <10% of wild-type. Surface receptor expression levels of other mutants were not quantified. Salts, atropine, ACh, and dTC were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). MTSET, [3-(trimethylammonium)-propyl]-methanethiosulfonate (MTSPT), 2-aminoethylmethanethiosulfonate (MTSEA), and 4-(N-maleimido)benzyltrimethylammonium (MBTA) were from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, Ontario, Canada), and Biotin-PEO-maleimide (Fig. 1) was from Pierce (Rockford, IL). Sulfhydryl-modifying reagents were prepared as millimolar stock solutions in recording solution and stored on ice during use, with fresh solutions prepared approximately every 2 h. For nAChR activation, ACh dose response curves were fit to the equation: I / Imax = [1 + (Kapp / [ACh])nH]-1, where I and Imax are the currents at a given concentration of ACh and the maximal current, respectively. Kapp is the apparent activation constant for ACh and nH is the Hill coefficient. pCLAMP (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and SigmaPlot (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) software were used for data analysis.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structures of sulfhydryl-modifying reagents. The extended length of ACh measures 8.7 Å. Reaction with MTSEA transfers to the Cys sulfur the primary amine 2-aminoethanethiol, which, in an extended conformation, extends 5.8 Å from the point of attachment to the surface of the primary amine group. Reaction with MTSET transfers thiocholine, which can extend 6.9 Å from the Cys sulfur to the surface of the trimethylammonio group. MBTA positions the trimethylammonio group 12.2 Å from the point of attachment. Biotin-PEO-maleimide has an extended length of 29 Å.

Rate Constants of nAChR Modification. For the sulfhydryl-reactive reagents producing irreversible inhibition of ACh responses, the time course of the reaction with a substituted Cys mutant in the absence of ACh was determined by recording the initial response to ACh and then the response to ACh after repeated applications of modifying reagent for 5-s intervals. Each application of reagent was followed by a ~1-min wash, three ACh test applications (5 s each), and a 1-min wash. ACh was generally applied at a concentration equal to Kapp. ACh-induced currents after treatment were plotted as a function of cumulative modification time (t) and fit by a single exponential function, It = Iinfinity  + (Io - Iinfinity ) exp(-t / tau ) where It is the current at a given time, Iinfinity is the amount of current remaining after the reaction is complete, and Io is the initial current level. 1 / tau  is the pseudo-first-order rate constant and the second-order rate constant, k, is (1 / tau ) / x, where x is the concentration of modifying reagent.

dTC Protection Assay. Responses to ACh at a concentration near Kapp were measured before and after coapplication of dTC and ACh to show that 10 µM dTC was sufficient to reversibly block >95% of the ACh response and that the Cys substitution itself had not interfered with the receptors' ability to bind dTC. This initial part of the assay was also necessary to determine that the effects of dTC were reversible. It was often necessary to wash the oocyte for several minutes after dTC application for full recovery of the ACh response. To measure the degree of protection by dTC, ACh test pulses were measured before and after 10 µM dTC was coapplied with a concentration of MTSET known to cause 50 to 80% inhibition (based on rate constants). The same concentration of MTSET was then applied in the absence of dTC, again using ACh test pulses to measure the extent of inhibition. The degree of protection was then determined by comparing the ratio of the extent of modification in the absence of dTC to the extent of modification in the presence of dTC: % protection = [1 - (% InhibitiondTC/MTSET / % InhibitionMTSET)] × 100.

Homology Modeling of the T. californica nAChR. Molecular modeling of the extracellular domain of the T. californica nAChR based upon the recently published structure of the AChBP (Brejc et al., 2001) was done using Insight II (Version 98; MSI, San Diego, CA) on a Silicon Graphics O2 workstation. The sequences for the four T. californica nAChR subunits (NCB accession numbers: ACRYA1, ACRYB1, ACRYG1, and ACRYD1) were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and the coordinates for the structure of the AChBP (PDB number 1I9B) were obtained from the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (http://www.rcsb.org). The nAChR subunit sequence alignment presented by Brejc et al. (2001) was used, and the AChBP structure was examined to ensure that insertions and deletions occurred within exposed flexible segments. The Insight II Homology module placed the nAChR sequences into the AChBP structure and the Insight II Discovery module energy minimized the resulting structural model. Compared with the primary structure of the AChBP, the nAChR alpha -subunit contains insertions in two regions within the ACh binding site. Although segment C in all neuronal nAChR alpha -subunits aligns well with the AChBP, the T. californica and skeletal muscle alpha -subunits contain a single residue insertion between alpha Cys-193 and alpha Tyr-198. We designated alpha Asp-195 as the inserted residue to preserve the beta 10-strand beginning at alpha Thr-196, with alpha Thr-196, alpha Tyr-198, and alpha Asp-200 projecting in the direction of the binding site, a structure consistent with experimental results described in this report. The other alpha -subunit insertion in the vicinity of the binding site was alpha Ala-96 in segment A. Both insertions were well tolerated upon minimization.

The only region of nAChR subunit primary structure which was not a straightforward substitution or small segment insertion was the poorly aligned region encompassing the amino acids of binding site segment F. This region of primary structure required insertions of 9, 7, and 11 amino acids in the beta -, gamma -, and delta -subunits, respectively, in the segment region between the beta 8 and beta 9 beta -strands. Lacking additional guidelines, we placed these insertions (beta 164-172, gamma 164-170, and delta 166-176) in external loops to preserve the structure of the adjacent regions that were homologous to the AChBP sequence. In our model, gamma Ser-161, which has been identified as a dTC selectivity determinant for mouse nAChR (Sine, 1993), occurs just after the beta 8-strand and is positioned beyond gamma Lys-34, ~15 Å from the center of the aromatic binding pocket. Similarly, gamma Glu-183, which was identified as a determinant of agonist Kapp (Czajkowski et al., 1993), occurs at the NH2 terminus of the beta 9-strand, which would lie near the plane of the membrane in a nAChR, 26 Å from the agonist binding site. gamma Asp-177 is positioned outside of alpha Tyr-190/gamma Trp-55, closer to the binding pocket than gamma Asp-174, an important determinant of agonist Kapp (Martin et al., 1996; Martin and Karlin, 1997). Because segment F residues seem more distantly related to the core structure of the binding site and amino acids in this region have not been examined in this study, the predicted positions of these residues are not included in our model of the T. californica nAChR ACh binding site.

In the AChBP structure, a HEPES molecule was identified within the aromatic pocket of the ACh binding site. We placed ACh molecules into the equivalent positions of our nAChR model (at the alpha -gamma and alpha -delta interfaces) using the Insight II Docking module, and the structure containing the ACh molecules was energy minimized. A single orientation for each ACh molecule was favored (docking energy of -30 kcal), which placed the ACh nitrogen within the aromatic pocket of the ligand binding site consisting of alpha Tyr-93, alpha Trp-149, alpha Tyr-190, alpha Tyr-198, and gamma Trp-55/delta Trp-57.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Functional Properties of nAChRs with Cys Substitutions in Binding Site Segments C and E. nAChR functional properties were assessed by measuring ACh-elicited currents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Each of the substitutions within alpha 195-alpha 201 and gamma 106-gamma 113, when expressed with other wild-type subunits, resulted in functional nAChRs (Table 1). For wild-type nAChR, the Kapp for ACh was 30 ± 8 µM. For the segment C mutant nAChRs, there was a significant rightward shift of Kapp only for the Cys substitution at alpha Y198C. The mutant nAChRs with substituted Cys adjacent to alpha Tyr-198 at either alpha Pro-197 or alpha Leu-199 were characterized by leftward shifts of Kapp, whereas for the other substitutions studied in this segment, the Kapp values were shifted <2-fold compared with wild-type. The Cys substitutions in segment E (gamma 106-gamma 113) were also well tolerated. The largest shifts of Kapp were seen for the gamma L109C (Kapp = 100 µM) and gamma Y111C (Kapp = 14 µM) mutants, whereas for substitutions at each of the other positions, Kapp for ACh was within a factor of 2 of wild-type.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Functional properties of binding site segment C and E mutant nAChRs

Macroscopic dose response curves were measured as described under Materials and Methods with the tabulated Kapp representing the mean ± S.D. determined from at least three oocytes. For wild-type nAChR, nH = 1.6 ± 0.1, and the Hill coefficients for the Cys mutants, measured in the same manner, were not significantly different from wild-type.

Modification of Substituted Cysteines within Binding Site Segment C. For oocytes expressing wild-type or mutant nAChRs, the response to ACh was measured at a concentration close to Kapp. Oocytes were then exposed to MTSET (200 µM), MTSEA (1 mM), or maleimide-PEO-biotin (1 mM) (Fig. 1) for 5 s in the absence of agonist; after a wash of 1 to 2 min, the ACh response was remeasured. Representative current traces are shown for wild-type and segment C mutant nAChRs treated with MTSET (Fig. 2A), and summary data for each of the mutants are presented for the effects of MTSET, MTSEA, and maleimide-PEO-biotin (Fig. 2B). We were particularly interested in determining whether thiocholine tethered at positions other than alpha Y198C in segment C would result in covalent activation. However, treatment with MTSET for 5 s resulted in irreversible inhibition of the ACh response by >75% for the alpha T196C, alpha P197C, and alpha D200C mutant nAChRs, and a smaller inhibition of the alpha I201C mutant that increased with longer reaction times (see later). The ~10% inhibition of the alpha D195C or alpha L199C mutants was less than that seen for wild-type nAChR and was not indicative of modification of the substituted Cys. Treatment with MTSEA also resulted in irreversible inhibition of ACh current responses for those mutants sensitive to MTSET. Modification with maleimide-PEO-biotin (1 mM, 5 s) significantly inhibited the ACh responses for the same mutants and, in addition, it inhibited irreversibly the alpha D195C nAChR mutant.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of MTSET, MTSEA, and Maleimide-PEO-Biotin on nAChRs containing Cys substitutions in binding site segment C. A, current responses (microamperes) of nAChRs to ACh were determined before and after a 5-s application of 200 µM MTSET. ACh test concentrations were near Kapp: (WT, 10 µM; alpha D195C, 30 µM; alpha T196C, 30 µM; alpha P197C, 3 µM; alpha Y198C, 1000 µM; alpha L199C, 3 µM; alpha D200C, 30 µM; alpha I201C, 30 µM). Horizontal scale bar is 5 s. B, the mean change in current was determined by testing oocytes with at least three applications of a half-maximal concentration of ACh before and after a 5-s application of 200 µM MTSET (black-square), 1 mM MTSEA (), or 2 mM maleimide-PEO-biotin (). Bars represent the mean change in current ± S.D. from experiments on at least three oocytes. Percentage change in current was calculated as: [(Iafter MX / Ibefore - 1)] × 100.

To look further for the possibility of channel activation, we also tested the effects of MTSPT, which is one methylene group longer than MTSET, reasoning that the quaternary ammonium attached to a longer tethering arm might act as an agonist if attached at other positions in proximity to alpha Tyr-198 (data not shown). MTSPT confirmed the accessibility of residues alpha T196C, alpha P197C, and alpha D200C by inhibiting subsequent ACh responses, but it only activated the alpha Y198C mutant, as described previously (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000).

Modification of Substituted Cysteines within Binding Site Segment E. Cys substitutions at gamma 106 to gamma 113 were similarly tested for their sensitivity to MTSET and MTSEA (Fig. 3). Summary data show that a 5-sec exposure to MTSET (200 µM) or MTSEA (1 mM) inhibited ACh responses for the gamma N107C mutant by ~30 and 75%, respectively, whereas both compounds inhibited the gamma L109C response by ~90%. Effects at the other positions tested were not sufficiently different from wild-type to make any conclusions about their accessibility. Exposure of these mutants to maleimide-PEO-biotin did not yield any additional information about residue accessibility (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of MTSET and MTSEA on nAChRs containing Cys substitutions in binding site segment E. MTSET (black-square) and MTSEA () current inhibition was determined as in Fig. 2B. ACh test concentrations, which were near Kapp, were 30 µM except for gamma alpha L109C, which was tested at 100 µM. Percentage current inhibition was defined as: [1 - (Iafter MX / Ibefore)] × 100. Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. from experiments on at least three oocytes.

Reaction Rate Constants. The rates of reaction were measured to determine the effect of full modification at a particular residue in response to a specific reagent and to give us the kinetic information necessary to design protocols for subsequent dTC protection experiments. For the Cys mutants inhibited irreversibly by MTSET or MTSEA, the rates of reaction with mutant nAChRs were determined by measuring the response to ACh after increasing reaction times and for various reagent concentrations (Fig. 4). For oocytes expressing alpha Y93C, alpha Y198C, and gamma E57C nAChRs, ACh responses were inhibited by >90% after full modification (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). In contrast, even after complete modification, the ACh current response was not fully inhibited for a number of the segment C and E Cys mutants characterized here. For alpha T196C and alpha I201C mutant nAChRs, ACh current responses were maximally inhibited 30 to 50% by MTSEA, whereas alpha P197C and alpha D200C responses were inhibited by 75% and 95%, respectively (Fig. 4A). For substitutions in segment E, MTSEA treatment inhibited gamma N107C responses by 80%, whereas it inhibited gamma L109C responses by >90% (Fig. 4B), similar to the level of inhibition seen for the gamma E57C mutant. MTSET treatment of alpha T196C nAChRs resulted in maximal inhibition of 80% (Fig. 4C), compared with the maximal inhibition of 30% seen after reaction with MTSEA. MTSET also more fully inhibited responses at alpha P197C than MTSEA. MTSET treatment inhibited to the same extent as MTSEA at alpha D200C (>90%) and alpha I201C (50%). For substitutions in the gamma -subunit, MTSET fully inhibited the gamma E57C and gamma L109C nAChR, whereas for the gamma N107C nAChR, maximal inhibition was only 50% (Fig. 4D).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Kinetics of modification of nAChRs with Cys substitutions in binding site segments C, D, or E by MTSEA, MTSET, and MBTA. Symbols represent the fraction of residual current response plotted as a function of cumulative modification time. ACh responses were measured before and after each 5-s application of reagent and were normalized to the initial response. Plots were fit with single exponential functions as described under Materials and Methods to give the first-order rate constant 1/tau (s-1) and the fractional response remaining after full modification, Iinfinity . A, MTSEA modification rates are shown for segment C residues: alpha T196C, 1 mM (tau  = 6 s, Iinfinity  = 0.65); alpha P197C, 30 µM (tau  = 6 s, Iinfinity  = 0.26); alpha D200C, 100 µM (tau  = 13 s, Iinfinity  = 0.06); alpha I201C, 1 mM (tau  = 8 s, Iinfinity  = 0.56). B, MTSEA modification rates are shown for gamma -subunit Cys substitutions in binding site segments D and E: gamma E57C, 300 µM (tau  = 10 s, Iinfinity  = 0); gamma N107C, 30 µM (tau  = 8 s, Iinfinity  = 0.13); gamma L109C, 30 µM (tau  = 5 s, Iinfinity  = 0.09). C, MTSET modification rates are shown for segment C residues: alpha T196C, 300 nM (tau  = 10 s, Iinfinity  = 0.18); alpha P197C, 30 µM (tau  = 6 s, Iinfinity  = 0.08); alpha D200C, 100 µM (tau  = 12 s, Iinfinity  = 0.06); alpha I201C, 1 mM (tau  = 7 s, Iinfinity  = 0.37). D, MTSET modification rates for gamma -subunit: gamma E57C, 100 µM (tau  = 8 s, Iinfinity  = 0.07); gamma N107C, 100 µM (tau  = 22 s, Iinfinity  = 0.18); gamma L109C, 10 µM (tau  = 5 s, Iinfinity  = 0.09). E, MBTA modification rates are shown for segment C residues: alpha T196C, 150 nM (tau  = 6 s, Iinfinity  = 0.36); alpha P197C, 100 µM (tau  = 26 s, Iinfinity  = 0.03); alpha D200C, 3 µM (tau  = 11 s, Iinfinity  = 0); alpha I201C, 1 mM (not fit). F, MBTA modification rates for gamma -subunit segment D and E residues: gamma E57C, 100 µM (tau  = 12 s, Iinfinity  = 0); gamma N107C, 1 mM (not fit); gamma L109C, 3 µM (tau  = 17 s, Iinfinity  = 0.15). Parameter uncertainties were 5 to 20% for tau  and 1 to 15% for Iinfinity .

We also examined the kinetics of modification of the mutant nAChRs by MBTA (Fig. 1), the alkylating antagonist used (Kao et al., 1984) to identify alpha Cys-192/193 as amino acids of the agonist binding site in the T. californica nAChR (after disulfide reduction). Reaction with MBTA at alpha T196C, alpha P197C, alpha D200C, and gamma L109C resulted in irreversible inhibition of the ACh responses to the same extent as seen after modification with MTSET (Fig. 4, E and F). alpha I201C and gamma N107C (Fig. 4, E and F) nAChRs, although sensitive to MTSEA and MTSET, were not inhibited after exposure to MBTA, suggesting that MBTA modification may be more orientation-dependent.

The apparent bimolecular reaction rate constants for MTSEA, MTSET, or MBTA modification of the mutant nAChRs (Table 2) were determined from the rates of reaction, which increased with increasing reagent concentration. While the reaction rate constants at alpha Y93C, alpha Y198C, and gamma E57C differed by as much as 500-fold, at each position, the rate constants for MTSEA and MTSET differed by <2-fold, and the rate constants for MBTA were never larger than for MTSET. For the other positions tested within segment C, the rate constants for MTSET (or MTSEA) varied by ~100-fold without any characteristic periodicity, and the rate constants for MBTA varied by as much as 3000-fold at adjacent amino acids (alpha T196C, alpha P197C). At alpha T196C, MTSET (k ~ 2 × 105 M-1 s-1) reacted ~1000-fold faster than MTSEA, whereas at the other positions examined, the rate constants for the two compounds differed by <2-fold. Whereas the rate constant for MBTA reaction with alpha Y198C (k ~ 5 × 103 M-1 s-1) was only 2% of that for MTSET, for alpha T196C the rate constant for MBTA (k ~ 1 × 106 M-1 s-1) was 5-fold higher than that for MTSET and similar to the rate constant for MBTA modification of alpha Cys-192/193 in reduced, native T. californica nAChR (k ~ 3 × 106 M-1 s-1) (Stauffer and Karlin, 1994). At alpha D200C the rate constant for MBTA (k ~ 5 × 104 M-1 s-1) was 50-fold higher than for MTSET. Within segment E, the rate constant for MTSET reaction at gamma L109C (k ~ 2 × 104 M-1 s-1) was 40-fold greater than at gamma N107C, and for gamma L109C or gamma E57C nAChRs the rate constants for MTSEA, MTSET and MBTA were essentially the same.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Modification reaction rate constants of mutant nAChRs by MTSEA, MTSET, and MBTA

Reaction rate constants, k (mM-1 sec-1), were determined as described under Materials and Methods and in Fig. 4 from experiments on 2 to 8 oocytes.

Effects of Alkylation on ACh Dose Response. Analysis of the kinetics of MTSET modification of the mutant nAChRs revealed that after full modification, ACh responses were inhibited by >= 90% at some positions (alpha Y93C, alpha P197C, alpha D200C, gamma E57C, gamma L109C) but not at others (alpha T196C, alpha I201C). For the latter positions, it was clear that the tethered thiocholine modified the ACh response but did not prevent ACh binding. Additional experiments were carried out to determine whether, at the other positions, tethered thiocholine acted as an irreversible antagonist or alternately as a modifier of ACh binding and/or gating. We characterized ACh dose response curves before and after modification to determine whether the inhibition seen at a fixed concentration of ACh resulted from reduction only of the maximal response or also from a modification of Kapp. If modification resulted in a nAChR no longer capable of being activated by ACh, then any ACh induced currents could result only from remaining unmodified nAChRs, and the response after exposure to MTSET would be characterized by a decreased maximal current without change of Kapp. For example, modification of alpha Y93C or gamma E57C nAChRs by MTSET or MTSEA resulted in reductions of maximum current without change of Kapp (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). If after modification, ACh was still able to gate the ion channel, but with either the binding or gating altered, then the response could be characterized by a shift of Kapp.

For the two positions apparently insensitive to MTSET (alpha D195C and alpha L199C), the shifts of the ACh dose response curves after MTSET treatment (~20% reduction of maximal response, Kapp shift <1.5-fold) were similar to the effects of MTSET on wild-type nAChR (Fig. 5, A and B; data not shown). For two positions with substantial responses after full modification (alpha T196C and alpha I201C), Kapp values were shifted by <2-fold (Fig. 5, A and C). The alpha P197C nAChR was inhibited by >90% when tested at 30 µM ACh (Fig. 4C). This inhibition resulted from a 10-fold increase in Kapp with less than a 20% reduction of the maximal response (Fig. 5B). After full modification of the alpha D200C mutant, the maximal response was reduced by only 80% and the Kapp value increased 2-fold (Fig. 5C). Thiocholine tethered at alpha T196C, alpha P197C, alpha D200C, or alpha I201C altered either ACh binding or gating, but did not act as a covalent antagonist that prevented the binding of ACh.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   ACh dose response curves before (filled symbols) and after (open symbols) reaction with MTSET. A, data were fit as described under Materials and Methods. Responses were normalized to the maximal response for each oocyte. A, alpha D195C (solid lines): Kapp = 20 µM, nH = 1.5; after 200 µM MTSET, 5 s: Kapp = 20 µM, Imax = 0.82. alpha T196C (dotted lines): Kapp = 18 µM, nH = 2.0, after 1 mM MTSET, 15 s: Kapp = 41 µM, Imax = 0.59. B, alpha P197C (solid lines): Kapp = 3.4 µM, nH = 1.2; after 1 mM MTSET, 10 s: Kapp = 22 µM, Imax = 0.84. alpha L199C (dotted lines): Kapp = 3.2 µM, nH = 1.2; after 1 mM MTSET, 10 s: Kapp = 4.9 µM, Imax = 0.89. C, alpha D200C (solid lines): Kapp = 44 µM, nH = 2.0; after 1 mM MTSET, 10 s: Kapp = 103 µM, Imax = 0.16. alpha I201C (dotted lines): Kapp = 28 µM, nH = 1.9; after 1 mM MTSET, 10 s: Kapp = 29 µM, Imax = 0.72. D, gamma E57C (solid lines): Kapp = 44 µM, nH = 2.0; after 100 µM MTSET, 5 s: Kapp = 47 µM, Imax = 0.34. gamma L109C (dotted lines): Kapp = 116 µM, nH = 1.4; after 200 µM MTSET, 5 s: Kapp = 400 µM, Imax = 0.29. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. for at least three measurements. Parameter uncertainties were 5 to 20% of Kapp or nH and <10% for Imax. Values of nH were unchanged after modification, with the exception of gamma E57C, for which nH decreased from 2.0 to 1.4.

For substitutions in the gamma -subunit, modification of either gamma E57C or gamma L109C can cause >90% inhibition of the ACh response when tested at a concentration near Kapp (Fig. 4D). For the gamma E57C mutant, limited modification of nAChRs by exposure to 100 µM MTSET for 5 s resulted in a 70% reduction of maximal response with no shift of Kapp (Fig. 5D). Treatment of the gamma L109C mutant with 200 µM MTSET for 5 s, which was sufficient for maximal modification (Fig. 4D), resulted in a reduction of the maximum response by only 70% accompanied by a 3- to 4-fold increase in Kapp (Fig. 5D). Thus, with thiocholine tethered at gamma L109C, ACh was still able to bind and gate the ion channel.

dTC Protection Experiments. From our previous work and the experiments presented here, we identified accessible residues in ACh binding site segments A (alpha Y93C and alpha N94C), C (alpha D195C, alpha T196C, alpha P197C, alpha Y198C, alpha D200C, and alpha I201C), D (gamma E57C), and E (gamma N107C and gamma L109C). However, the fact that modification of the substituted cysteines led to altered ACh responses does not establish that these positions actually contribute to the structure of the ACh binding site. The altered responses could result from an allosteric modification of the structure of the binding site or from a perturbation of the conformational transition necessary for channel gating. If MTSET is within the agonist binding site when it reacts with a substituted Cys, then that reaction should be inhibited by the presence of a reversible agonist or antagonist that is bound in proximity to that position.

We used the competitive antagonist dTC to initially characterize the effects of cholinergic drugs on the modification by MTSET. When applied with an ACh concentration causing ~50% maximal response, we found that 10 µM dTC was sufficient to block >95% of the ACh responses for the wild-type and the Cys mutant nAChRs, with >90% recovery from inhibition when the ACh response was retested after a wash of 1 to 2 min (data not shown). To measure the degree of protection by dTC, ACh test pulses were determined before and after 10 µM dTC was coapplied for 5 s with a concentration of MTSET known to cause 50 to 80% inhibition. The same concentration of MTSET was then applied for 5 s in the absence of dTC, again using ACh test pulses to measure the extent of inhibition.

Representative current traces for dTC protection experiments are shown for residues in segments A, D, and E (Fig. 6, left) and for segment C (Fig. 6, right). ACh responses for wild-type nAChRs did not change after dTC/MTSET or MTSET application. dTC at 10 µM did not prevent reaction of MTSET at residue alpha Y93C. alpha Y93C nAChRs were inhibited by ~90% when MTSET was applied in the presence of dTC, and the remaining ACh response was inhibited by a further treatment by MTSET alone. Similarly, dTC did not prevent reaction of MTSET with alpha N94C (not shown). In contrast, for gamma E57C in segment D, gamma L109C in segment E, and for some of the positions in segment C, dTC did protect against modification by MTSET. dTC provided 90% protection of the gamma E57C and gamma L109C nAChRs. For example, for gamma E57C, the ACh response was inhibited by only 7% after the oocyte was perfused with MTSET in the presence of dTC and then inhibited by 75% after perfusion with MTSET alone.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Competitive antagonist protection of MTSET alkylation of reactive Cys residues. To measure the degree of protection by 10 µM dTC, current responses to ACh at a concentration near Kapp were measured before and after 10 µM dTC was coapplied for 5 s with a concentration of MTSET known to cause 50 to 80% inhibition. The same concentration of MTSET was then applied for 5 s in the absence of dTC, again using ACh test pulses to measure the extent of inhibition. The degree of protection was defined as [1 - (% InhibitiondTC/MTSET / % InhibitionMTSET)] × 100. Current traces are shown from oocytes expressing wild-type and nAChRs with substitutions in segments A (alpha Y93C), D (gamma E57C), and E (gamma L109C) (left) and segment C (alpha T196C, alpha P197C, alpha D200C, and alpha I201C) (right). Horizontal scale bar is 5 s.

Similar protection experiments were done for the segment C residues accessible to MTSET modification (Fig. 6, right). Because of the high reaction rate constant for MTSET modification of alpha T196C, MTSET was used at 1 µM for that position. Consistent with lower rate constants for modification of the other positions (Table 2), MTSET was tested at 10 µM for alpha P197C, at 100 µM for alpha D200C, and at 1 mM for alpha I201C. dTC protected against MTSET modification at alpha T196C and alpha D200C but not at alpha P197C and alpha I201C. For the alpha T196C receptor, dTC protected by ~80% in the experiment shown in Fig. 6; in two additional experiments, dTC protected alpha T196C by ~60%. For the alpha D200C receptor in the experiment shown (Fig. 6) and in an additional experiment, dTC protected by 80 to 90%. dTC did not protect the alpha P197C nAChR from modification: there was ~40% inhibition of the ACh response after treatment with MTSET in the presence or absence of dTC. Similarily, dTC did not protect the alpha I201C nAChR from modification. Exposure to 1 mM MTSET for 5 s in the presence of dTC caused ~20% inhibition of the subsequent alpha I201C ACh response, whereas application of 1 mM MTSET alone caused only a further 10% inhibition of the ACh response. Because there was more inhibition after exposure to MTSET in the presence of dTC than in its absence, we conclude that dTC afforded no protection at alpha I201C. Thus, within segment C, dTC binding protected against alkylation at alpha T196C, alpha Y198C (previously shown), and alpha D200C, but not at alpha P197C or alpha I201C.

A Homology Model of the T. californica nAChR Binding Site. The studies described above were carried out before the publication of the structure of the molluscan AChBP (Brejc et al., 2001). To facilitate discussion of our results, we developed a model of the T. californica nAChR alpha -gamma binding site based upon the structure of the AChBP (Fig. 7). The amino acids identified by affinity labeling and mutagenesis as contributors to the ACh binding site of the nAChR are located at each subunit interface, with amino acids of segments A, B, and C contributed from one subunit and amino acids from segments D, E, and F from the other. Secondary structure elements are identified by the ribbon representation and key binding site side chains depicted in ball and stick representation. After energy minimization of the AChBP model backbone containing the primary sequences of the extracellular regions of the T. californica nAChR subunits, no significant movement was noted for the structures containing the amino acids of binding site segments A-E. As discussed in "Materials and Methods", the size of the insertions in the segment F region of the gamma - or delta -subunit prohibits any confident prediction of the position of those insertions, and we do not depict amino acids from this region in our model of the binding site. With that caveat, the most prominent structure changes between the ACh binding site of the AChBP and the model of the T. californica nAChR binding site were due to single amino acid substitutions, primarily within segment E. 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Stereo representation of the T. californica nAChR agonist binding site at the interface between the alpha - and gamma -subunits. A homology model of the T. californica nAChR was constructed from the known three-dimensional structure of the molluscan AChBP. The beta -sheet regions of the model are denoted by the numbering system for the AChBP (beta 1, beta 2, etc.). A stereo representation of the ACh binding site is presented in ball and stick representation of side chains identified by affinity labeling or mutational analyses, including the Cys substitutions described in this report. The amino acids identified are in binding site segments A (alpha Tyr-93 and alpha Asn-94, gold), B (alpha Trp-149 and alpha Tyr-151, red), C [alpha Tyr-190, alpha Cys-192/193 disulfide (yellow), alpha Thr-196, alpha Tyr-198, and alpha Asp-200, blue], D (gamma Trp-55 and gamma Glu-57, green), and E (gamma Asn-107, gamma Leu-109, gamma Tyr-111, gamma Tyr-117, and gamma Leu-119, magenta). A section of the segment F ribbon is included (gray) as well as gamma Lys-34 on beta 1 (brown). An ACh molecule (dotted Connolly surface) is shown within the site. After energy minimization, the ACh nitrogen, represented by the cyan sphere, is equidistant (~5 Å) from the aromatic side chains of gamma Trp-55, alpha Trp-149, alpha Tyr-190, and alpha Tyr-198 and 6 Å from alpha Tyr-93. The acetyl group protrudes into the opening between segments C and E with the carbonyl oxygen oriented toward gamma Leu-119. The arrow denotes the likely route of ligand access.

The binding site is a pocket lined by aromatic side chains from alpha Tyr-93, alpha Trp-149, alpha Tyr-190, alpha Tyr-198, and gamma Trp-55. alpha Tyr-93 and alpha Trp-149 are positioned in segments immediately after beta -strands (AChBP beta 4 and beta 7, respectively). alpha Tyr-190 and alpha Tyr-198 are on the same side of antiparallel beta -strands (AChBP beta 9 and beta 10) with the turn formed by the alpha Cys-192/193 disulfide, which also contributes to the top of the binding pocket. The side chains of the amino acids identified from gamma -subunit segments E (gamma Leu-109, gamma Tyr-111, gamma Tyr-117, and gamma Leu-119) and D (gamma Trp-55, gamma Glu-57) are on a common surface of three adjacent beta -strands (AChBP beta 5', beta 6, beta 2) which form a beta  sheet extending to beta 1 that includes gamma Lys-34, an affinity determinant for agonists (Prince and Sine, 1996) and for alpha -conotoxin M1, a peptide antagonist (Sine et al., 1995; Bren and Sine, 2000). As predicted from the results of affinity labeling and mutagenesis (Chiara et al., 1999; LeNovere et al., 1999), the segment E amino acids are on antiparallel beta  strands with a three-amino-acid turn centered on gamma Asp-113. Whereas gamma Trp-55 contributes to the base of the pocket, the side chains of gamma Leu-109, gamma Tyr-111, and gamma Tyr-117 form part of the entrance to the pocket. gamma Leu-119, a position identified by Cys mutagenesis of mouse nAChR as important for alpha -bungarotoxin binding (Sine, 1997; Osaka et al., 2000), is the side chain from segment E that projects closest to the aromatic side chains forming the binding pocket, and the turn at gamma Asp-113 is most distant (~20 Å) from the aromatic pocket. While the positions of segment F agonist/antagonist affinity determinants are not included in Fig. 7, their distances from the center of the aromatic binding pocket are described in Materials and Methods.

The subunit primary structure of the AChBP is most closely related to the extracellular domain of nAChR alpha -subunits; as a homopentamer, it is more similar in structure to the alpha 7 homopentameric neuronal nAChR than to the muscle-type nAChR. It has yet to be determined whether the AChBP undergoes conformational changes analogous to those seen with the nAChR. Because the AChBP binds ACh with reasonably high affinity (K = 4 µM) (Smit et al., 2001), it is plausible that its binding site structure differs from that of the nAChR in the resting (closed channel) state, which has low affinity for agonist, and is more similar to that of the nAChR in either the desensitized or open channel states, which bind ACh with high affinity.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In this study, we have determined the accessibility for modification of individually substituted cysteines within segments C (alpha 195-201) and E (gamma 106-113) and have further assessed their accessibility in the presence of the competitive antagonist dTC. We previously identified alpha Y93C, alpha N94C, alpha Y198C, and gamma E57C as accessible for modification (Sullivan and Cohen, 2000). Similar to the results obtained for segments A and D, within segment E, only two positions (gamma N107C, gamma L109C) were clearly identified by our assay as accessible for modification. Within segment C, all of the positions tested demonstrated accessibility for modification, except for alpha L199C. The pattern of protection by dTC identifies residues within the binding site likely to be in close proximity to bound dTC, and the selective protection of residues within segment C identifies the surface of a beta -strand projecting into the dTC/agonist binding site. With the availability of a model of the T. californica nAChR extracellular domain, based upon the AChBP structure, it becomes possible to evaluate our results to identify consistencies and differences between the model and the structure of the nAChR binding site in the absence of agonist.

Modification of Substituted Cysteines within Segments C and E. Our studies in segment C complement previous studies in which functional embryonic mouse Cys mutant nAChRs (alpha 183-197) were expressed on the cell surface and accessible for modification by a thiol-specific biotin, with the exception of alpha Y190C (Spura et al., 2000). We found that ACh responses were readily quantified for each mutant T. californica nAChR containing Cys substitutions within alpha 195-201, and all residues within alpha 195-201, with the exception of alpha L199C, were accessible for modification. For most of these positions, introduction of either a primary amine (after MTSEA reaction) or quaternary amine (after MTSET or MBTA reaction) caused an altered response to ACh rather than an irreversible inhibition of binding. For the alpha Y93C, gamma E57C, and alpha Y198C receptors, earlier results indicated that covalent modification prevented the binding of ACh. Clearly, direct radioligand binding studies are required to determine the equilibrium constants for ACh binding to the modified Cys mutant nAChRs.

For the Cys substitutions within gamma 106-113 of segment E, ACh responses were modified after MTSEA or MTSET reaction with gamma N107C and gamma L109C. Reaction of the gamma Y111C nAChR with any of the reagents had no effect on ACh responses. This was surprising, because gamma Tyr-111 is photolabeled by [3H]dTC and is a dTC affinity determinant (Chiara et al., 1999). However, substitution of gamma Tyr-111 by arginine had no effect on ACh equilibrium binding affinity or on the concentration dependence of channel activation, and it is quite likely that MTSET (or MBTA) may have reacted with gamma Y111C without altering the ACh response.

dTC Protection and Binding Site Structure. Because our functional assay identified modification of substituted cysteines in segments A (alpha Y93C, alpha N94C), C (alpha 196-201, except alpha L199C), D (gamma E57C), and E (gamma N107C, gamma L109C), we wanted to determine how dTC binding altered the accessibility of cysteines for modification. If bound dTC sterically occluded access of MTSET to a binding site Cys, the rate of reaction would be reduced in proportion to dTC occupancy. Within segment C, dTC protected substituted cysteines from alkylation at alpha 196, alpha 198, and alpha 200 but it did not protect alpha 197 or alpha 201. This dTC protection pattern is readily explained if this portion of segment C were organized as a beta -strand with the side chains of alpha 196, alpha 198, and alpha 200 on a common surface projecting toward the dTC/ACh binding site, as is seen in the structure of the molluscan AChBP (Brejc et al., 2001) and in the nAChR binding site model (Fig. 7, blue).

The fact that dTC protects alpha Y198C, gamma E57C, and gamma L109C from modification but not alpha Y93C or alpha N94C is consistent with the results of [3H]dTC photolabeling, where there was no detectable incorporation of [3H]dT