|
|
|
|
Vol. 61, Issue 5, 1070-1080, May 2002
-Aminobutyric AcidB Receptor
C-Termini for G-Protein Coupling
Axaron Bioscience AG, Heidelberg, Germany (S.G., R.K., H.-C.K.); Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany (B.J.S., G.K., F.S.); Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, Guthrie Research Institute, Sayre, Pennsylvania (S.R.I.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional
-aminobutyric acidB (GABAB)
receptors assemble from two subunits, GABAB(1) and
GABAB(2). This heteromerization, which involves a
C-terminal coiled-coil interaction, ensures efficient surface
trafficking and agonist-dependent G-protein activation. In the present
study, we took a closer look at the implications of the intracellular C
termini of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) for G-protein coupling. We generated a series of C-terminal mutants of
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) and tested them for
physical interaction, surface trafficking, coupling to adenylyl
cyclase, and G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels in
human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells as well as on endogenous calcium
channels in sympathetic neurons of the superior cervical ganglion
(SCG). We found that the C-terminal interaction contributes only partly
to the heterodimeric assembly of the subunits, indicating the presence
of an additional interaction site. The described endoplasmic reticulum
retention signal within the C terminus of GABAB(1)
functioned only in the context of specific amino acids, which
constitute part of the GABAB(1) coiled-coil sequence. This
finding may provide a link between the retention signal and its
shielding by the coiled coil of GABAB(2). In HEK293 cells,
we observed that the two well-known GABAB receptor
antagonists
[S-(R*,R*)]-[3-[[1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino]-2-hydroxypropyl](cyclohexylmethyl) phosphinic acid (CGP54626) and
(+)-(2S)-5,5-dimethyl-2-morpholineacetic acid (SCH50911)
CGP54626 and SCH50911 function as inverse agonists. The C termini of
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) strongly influenced
agonist-independent G-protein coupling, although they were not
necessary for agonist-dependent G-protein coupling. The C-terminal
GABAB receptor mutants described here demonstrate that the
active receptor conformation is stabilized by the coiled-coil
interaction. Thus, the C-terminal conformation of the GABAB
receptor may determine its constitutive activity, which could be a
therapeutic target for inverse agonists.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GABAB
receptors mediate metabotropic functions of the inhibitory
neurotransmitter GABA via activation of G-proteins of the Gi/o class. They inhibit adenylyl cyclase and
modulate the activity of calcium and potassium channels, thereby
controlling presynaptic neurotransmitter release and postsynaptic
inhibitory potentials (Bowery, 1993
). Impaired
GABAB receptor function is associated with
pathophysiological effects, including pain, epilepsy, spasticity, and
cognitive deficits (Couve et al., 2000
), which was recently highlighted
in mice deficient for a GABAB receptor subunit
(Prosser et al., 2001
; Schuler et al., 2001
).
Thus far, two GABAB receptor subunits, termed
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2), have
been cloned (Kaupmann et al., 1997
, 1998
; Jones et al., 1998
; White et
al., 1998
; Kuner et al., 1999
; Ng et al., 1999
). Both subtypes exist in
several splice forms, the most prominent being two N-terminal splice
forms of GABAB(1),
GABAB(1a), and GABAB(1b),
whereby the first 147 residues in GABAB(1a) are
replaced with 18 different residues in GABAB(1b)
(Kaupmann et al., 1997
). GABAB receptors belong
to the C family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which also
comprises metabotropic glutamate, Ca2+-sensing,
and vomeronasal receptors. They all have an unusually large N-terminal,
extracellular ligand binding domain that shows similarity to bacterial
periplasmic amino acid binding proteins (Couve et al., 2000
). Although
GPCRs were earlier generally believed to function as monomers, several
GPCRs have been recently shown to exist as homo- as well as
heterodimers that are functional and play important roles in signaling
(Salahpour et al., 2000
). C-family GPCRs are likely to function as
dimers (Romano et al., 1996
; Bai et al., 1999
); also, A-family GPCRs
(e.g., opioid receptor subtypes or dopamine and somatostatin receptors)
have been shown to form homodimers and heterodimers, thereby creating
new receptors with altered ligand binding and functional properties
(Jordan and Devi, 1999
; Rocheville et al., 2000a
,b
).
GABAB receptors are unique in that complete
functional activity depends on the formation of heteromers between
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2). The
monomeric receptor molecules alone are not able to reproduce the
pharmacological properties of native GABAB
receptors. Both splice forms GABAB(1a) and
GABAB(1b) show lower affinity for agonists than
native receptors but bind GABAB receptor
antagonists with native affinity. GABAB(2) has
not yet been shown to bind GABA-ergic ligands with appreciable affinity
(Jones et al., 1998
; Kaupmann et al., 1998
). However, coexpression of
GABAB(2) with GABAB(1)
restores high-affinity agonist binding as well as regulation of
intracellular effector systems (Jones et al., 1998
; Kaupmann et al.,
1998
; White et al., 1998
; Kuner et al., 1999
; Ng et al., 1999
).
G-protein coupling seems to mainly involve intracellular loops of
GABAB(2), but efficient G-protein coupling
requires allosteric interactions of GABAB(1) with
GABAB(2) (Galvez et al., 2001
; Robbins et al.,
2001
).
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2)
associate, at least partly, through a coiled-coil motif forming a
parallel coiled-coil helix found in their respective C termini
(Kammerer et al., 1999
; Kuner et al., 1999
). When expressed alone in
human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells or sympathetic neurons,
GABAB(1) is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum
(ER) (Couve et al., 1998
) due to a C-terminal retention motif
[RXR(R)] (Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000
), which is located C-terminal
of its coiled-coil region. Through this coiled-coil interaction,
GABAB(2) masks the retention signal present in
GABAB(1), thus enabling surface expression of
functional GABAB receptors (Margeta-Mitrovic et
al., 2000
; Calver et al., 2001
; Pagano et al., 2001
).
Despite the discovery of structural elements for retention and interaction of GABAB receptor subunits, a detailed understanding of the functional role of GABAB receptor C termini is still lacking. The apparent interdependence of heterodimerization, surface trafficking and efficient G-protein coupling in vivo made it difficult to assess the exact molecular function of single domains or interactions within the GABAB receptor dimer. Thus, the aim of our study was to dissect these functions and to examine the role of defined C-terminal domains in heteromerization and signaling. We constructed several C-terminal mutant proteins of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) and analyzed heterodimerization, cell surface expression, G-protein coupling, and constitutive activity in cotransfected HEK293 cells and in sympathetic neurons of the superior cervical ganglion (SCG).
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of Mutant Receptor Subunits.
Cloning of
full-length rat GABAB(1a) and
GABAB(2) sequences was described in Kuner et al.
(1999)
. The truncated and chimeric versions of
GABAB(1a) were generated by PCR and subcloning of the PCR products into the PstI (bp 2281) and SalI
sites of GABAB(1) in pBlueScript (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA). In GABAB(1a)
CT and GABAB(1a)
924-960, respectively, either the
whole C terminus (amino acids R862 to K960) or amino acids R924 to K960
after the coiled-coil region were deleted. In the chimeric constructs
GABAB(1a)_2CT817-940 and
GABAB(1a)_2CT, either the C-terminal sequence of
GABAB(1a) after the coiled-coil sequence (i.e.,
amino acids R924-K960) or the whole GABAB(1a) C
terminus (amino acids R857-K960) was exchanged by overlap extension
PCR for the equivalent sequences in GABAB(2) (i.e., amino acids D817-L940 or amino acids I744-L940, respectively). GABAB(1a)
cc was constructed by ligating
annealed complementary oligonucleotides with appropriate overhangs into
the BclI (bp 2576) and NarI (bp 2772) sites of
GABAB(1a), yielding deletion of the coiled-coil
encoding sequence (bp 2659-2763 encoding amino acids S887-L921). To
allow surface detection of GABAB(1a) mutants, the
sequence for the c-myc epitope was inserted behind the sequence of the
predicted signal peptide by overlap extension PCR resulting in the
encoded protein sequence
14LGAEQKLISEEDLNGGA19
(c-myc epitope, including an additional N printed in bold).
820-940 and
GABAB(2)
CT, the codons for amino acids
E820-L940 and F761-L940 were deleted by PCR. For construction of
GABAB(2)
748-780 and
GABAB(2)
CT+cc, two PCR fragments were generated that could be ligated through BamHI, thereby
replacing the codons covering the sequence between the end of
transmembrane 7 and the coiled-coil sequence (amino acids T748-N780)
by a single isoleucine codon (ATC). In
GABAB(2)
CT+cc the C-terminal sequence (amino
acids E820-L940 after the GABAB(2) coiled-coil
region) was deleted additionally. The coiled-coil deletion construct
GABAB(2)
cc and the chimeric construct
GABAB(2)_1CT922-960 were made by overlap extension PCR. In GABAB(2)
cc amino acids
S785-Q816 were deleted. For generating the chimeric construct
GABAB(2)_1CT922-960, the GABAB(1) C-terminal sequence (amino acids
R922-K960 after the coiled-coil sequence) was amplified and exchanged
for the corresponding C-terminal end of GABAB(2)
(amino acids P819-L940) by overlap extension PCR. All constructs were
cloned into a CMV expression vector (Schall et al., 1990
cc, the C-terminal fragments
(starting at I744) of GABAB(2) and
GABAB(2)
cc were amplified by PCR and cloned into a CMV expression vector (Schall et al., 1990
|
Antibodies. The GABAB(1)-specific polyclonal antiserum was bought from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA) and is directed against the last 20 amino acids (941-960) in GABAB(1a). GABAB(2) -specific antisera were raised against two synthetic peptides, one derived from amino acids 203 to 222 in the N-terminal extracellular domain (DVQRFSEVRNDLTGVLYGED-amid) and the second corresponding to amino acids 831 to 850 in the C terminus of GABAB(2) (QELNDILSLGNFTESTDGGK-amid). Peptide synthesis, antibody generation and purification were done by ARK Scientific GmbH Biosystems (Darmstadt, Germany). The titers of the crude sera (as defined in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test as the reciprocal of the serum dilution resulting in an OD492 of 0.2 when using 1 µg of free antigen on the solid phase per well) were 66,000 for the serum recognizing the N-terminally located peptide sequence and 300,000 for the serum recognizing the C-terminally located peptide sequence, respectively. For detection of the myc epitope tag, a rabbit polyclonal anti-Myc tag IgG antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) was used. Peroxidase- and tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies were bought from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).
Cell Culture and Transfection. HEK293 cells were maintained in modified Eagle's medium (MEM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and PenStrep at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were transfected at 70% confluence with 25 µg of total DNA for a 15-cm plate or 2.5 µg of DNA for a 24-well coverslip by calcium phosphate precipitation. Cells were incubated for 2 days before testing expression of recombinant proteins or performing functional assays.
Receptor Binding Assays. Transfected cells were harvested, washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or Krebs-Tris buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 118 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, and 5.6 mM glucose) and incubated in PBS or Krebs-Tris-buffer with 10 nM [3H]CGP54626A (Tocris Cookson Ltd., Bristol, UK) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). The incubation was terminated by addition of 3 ml of cold washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and rapid vacuum filtration over Whatman GF/C filters prewashed with 2 ml of washing buffer. The filters were washed twice with 3 ml of cold washing buffer and counted for tritium using a Tri-Carb scintillation counter (Canberra EuriSys GmbH, Rüsselsheim, Germany). Nonspecific binding was determined either with 10 µM CGP54626 or with 2 mM SCH50911 (Tocris Cookson).
Coimmunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis. Transfected HEK293 cells were collected 48 h after transfection and solubilized over night by gentle rotation at 4°C with 2% Triton X-100 in PBS containing 400 mM NaCl and 10% glycerol as well as the protease inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), aprotinin (10 µg/ml), pepstatin A (5 µg/ml), and chymostatin (5 µg/ml). After ultracentrifugation at 100,000g for 1 h at 4°C, the supernatant was diluted 2-fold in PBS and rotated with 1/100 volume (i.e., 8 µl) of preimmuneserum for 1 h at 4°C. For clearance of unspecific immunocomplexes 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were added and incubation continued for 1 h. Then, the supernatant of the protein A-Sepharose beads was rotated with 1/100 volume (i.e., 8 µl) of the GABAB(2) -C terminus-specific anti-peptide antiserum for 1 h at 4°C. Immunocomplexes were precipitated for 1 to 2 h at 4°C again with 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose. The captured immunocomplexes of both the incubation with preimmuneserum and antiserum were washed 4 times with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 and once with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 before eluting into sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 200 mM dithiothreitol, 6% SDS, 10% glycerol, 7 M urea, 0.01% bromphenol blue) at 42°C for 10 min. Samples were resolved through 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk powder in PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20, the nitrocellulose membranes were probed with the GABAB(1)-specific antiserum, diluted 1:2000 in blocking solution, for 1 h at room temperature, followed by three 5-min washes in PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 and incubation with horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-guinea pig antibodies. Bound antibody was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (enhanced chemiluminescence; Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany).
Immunocytochemistry. Cells were seeded and grown on sterile glass coverslips coated with either fibronectin (10 µg/ml) or poly-D-lysine (5 µg/ml) and transfected with various receptor mutant constructs 2 days before immunocytochemical analysis. For analyzing receptor expression, cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed on ice for 10 min in 2% paraformaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde, incubated twice for 5 min each in 50 mM glycine in PBS, and washed with PBS. For permeabilization, cells were incubated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min on ice and blocked for 30 min at RT with 4% normal goat serum (NGS) and 0.2% Triton X-100 in cold PBS. Primary antibody incubations (anti-Myc IgG, 1:200; anti-GABAB(2) antibodies, 1:100 or 1:200) were in 2% NGS and 0.1% Triton X-100 in cold Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) for 2 to 3 h at RT. After three 10 min washes with 1% NGS in TBS at RT, the cells were incubated with donkey-anti-rabbit tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody (1:400) in 1.5% NGS in TBS in the dark for 30 min at RT. After several washing steps, cover slips were mounted and analyzed using a confocal microscope (Leica Mikrosysteme Vertrieb GmbH, Bensheim, Germany).
For localization of receptor proteins at the cell surface, intact cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with the primary antibody in PBS containing 2% NGS for blocking. Then, cells were fixed and incubated with the secondary antibody as described above.Cellular cAMP Accumulation Assay. Two days before the assay, HEK293 cells plated onto 15-cm plates were cotransfected with various combinations of GABAB receptor subtype mutants. On the day of the assay, the medium was replaced by MEM medium supplemented with 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma) and the cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were harvested and resuspended to 2.5 × 106 cells/ml in Krebs-Tris buffer supplemented with 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine. These cells (200 µl; 0.5 × 106 cells) were added to tubes containing either no drugs (basal activity), 2 µM forskolin (FSK), or 2 µM FSK plus GABA-ergic agonists [e.g., 100 µM (R)-baclofen (Tocris Cookson)] or antagonists [e.g., 10 µM CGP54626 (Tocris Cookson)] as indicated in the figure legend. After 20 min at 37°C, the tubes were placed on ice and lysed in 167 mM HCl. The lysate was incubated on ice for at least 1 h and, after neutralization with NaOH, was centrifuged at 15,000g to remove cell debris. The cellular production of cAMP was measured in the supernatant using the commercially available cAMP 3H assay system from Amersham Biosciences. Experiments were performed at least twice in duplicate. The significance of differences was evaluated using unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-tests.
Coupling to GIRKs.
Coexpression of GIRK1 and GIRK2 with
GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2)
wild-type or mutant constructs was as described by Kuner et al. (1999)
.
Transfected cells on coverslips were transferred to the stage of an
inverted microscope and were continuously perfused with a solution
containing 115 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, and 10 mM glucose, pH
7.25, adjusted with NaOH. The whole-cell configuration of the
patch-clamp technique was applied at RT with pipette solutions
containing 115 mM K-gluconate, 20 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM EGTA, 4 mM
MgATP, and 0.3 mM NaGTP, pH 7.25, adjusted with KOH. GABA (100 µM) or
(R)-baclofen (50 µM) was dissolved in the extracellular
solution and was applied steadily to single cells by a double-barreled
application pipette. The inward rectifier currents were activated by
voltage ramp generation. For analysis, GIRK-currents in the absence and
presence of agonist were compared at
135 mV. Values are expressed as
mean ± S.E.M. and p-values represent the result of
independent two-tailed t-tests.
Ca2+-Channel Current Recordings.
Superior
cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons were isolated and injected with cDNA as
described previously (Ikeda, 1996
; Ikeda, 1997
). Briefly, SCG neurons
were enzymatically dissociated from adult rats and then plated onto
polystyrene culture dishes (35 mm), coated with
poly-L-lysine, and maintained in a humidified atmosphere of
95% air/5% CO2 at 37°C.
GABAB receptor subunits were expressed by
intranuclear microinjection (0.1 µg/µl per cDNA construct).
Electrophysiological recordings were made within 24 h after
injection of vectors. Injected neurons were identified by fluorescence
from coexpressed jellyfish green fluorescent protein (enhanced green
fluorescent protein; BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA).
80 mV. Current amplitude was measured
10 ms after the onset of the test pulse. The inhibition of
Ca2+ channel currents was tested with
noradrenaline and was comparable in uninjected and injected neurons
(not shown). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.;
p-values were determined by analysis of variance followed by
Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interactions between Coiled-Coil Deletion Mutants of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2)
To assess the role of C-terminal domains of
GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) for
interaction, trafficking, and function of the
GABAB receptor, we generated a series of deletion
mutants (Fig. 1). These include specific deletions of the 35 and 32 amino acids in GABAB(1a) and
GABAB(2), respectively, which have been shown to
mediate a coiled-coil interaction (Kuner et al., 1999
;
GABAB(1a)
cc and
GABAB(2)
cc). To test the importance of the
C-terminal coiled-coil interaction for the integrity of the
GABAB receptor, we performed coimmunoprecipitations using full-length proteins. Combinations of
wild-type and coiled-coil deletion constructs were cotransfected into
HEK293 cells and GABAB(2) or
GABAB(2)
cc was immunoprecipitated from Triton
X-100 extracts with preimmuneserum (PIS) followed by an antiserum (AS)
directed against the C terminus of GABAB(2). The
immunoprecipitated protein was blotted and analyzed for coprecipitation of GABAB(1a) or
GABAB(1a)
cc (Fig.
2A). GABAB(2) not
only precipitated GABAB(1a) but also
GABAB(1a)
cc. Furthermore,
GABAB(2)
cc was also able to precipitate
GABAB(1a) and
GABAB(1a)
cc. In all cases, the appropriate
preimmuneserum did not lead to precipitation of GABAB(1a) or GABAB(1a)
cc
(Fig. 2A, PIS). Coimmunoprecipitation of GABAB
receptor wild-type proteins was most efficient (Fig. 2A, AS). We also
analyzed the interaction of the soluble C-terminal fragments of
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2). In
both yeast two-hybrid assays and glutathione S-transferase
pull-down assays, deletion of the coiled-coil region in one of the
fragments abolished the interaction (not shown). These data suggest
that interaction domains outside the cytoplasmic C termini of
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2), in
addition to the coiled-coil domains within the cytoplasmic C termini,
mediate assembly of GABAB receptor heteromers.
|
C-Terminal Determinants of GABAB Receptor Surface Expression
In the absence of GABAB(2),
GABAB(1a) is retained in the ER (Couve et al.,
1998
). However, GABAB(1a) efficiently reaches the cell surface after coexpression of GABAB(2)
(White et al., 1998
; Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000
).
We tested the relevance of C-terminal stretches of the two subunits for GABAB receptor trafficking. The plasma membrane targeting of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) mutants expressed in HEK293 cells was examined by immunocytochemistry using antisera directed against extracellular N-terminal epitopes. This enabled staining of receptors targeted to the cell membrane in nonpermeabilized cells [surface staining (ST)] compared with those present at the membrane and in the cell interior in detergent permeabilized cells (P) (Fig. 2, B-D).
All GABAB(1a) deletion and chimeric mutants were
expressed to a similar extent and, except for the full-length
GABAB(1a) protein, were all found to be located
at the plasma membrane (Fig. 2B). All GABAB(2)
mutants were expressed at the cell surface, but in GABAB(2)
CT transfections, comparably fewer
cells were found to be surface stained and staining was less intense
(Fig. 2C). The total expression of
GABAB(2)
748-780 and
GABAB(2)
CT+cc seemed to be lower than that of
the remaining GABAB(2) mutants (Western blot data
not shown). In cotransfected HEK293 cells, all
GABAB(2) mutants which still possessed the
coiled-coil region (i.e., GABAB(2)
820-940, GABAB(2)_1CT922-960,
GABAB(2)
748-780, and
GABAB(2)
CT+cc) were able to traffick
GABAB(1a) to the cell surface;
GABAB(2)
820-940 was the most efficient (Fig.
2D and Table 1). Interestingly, GABAB(2) subunits lacking the coiled-coil domain
were able to traffick GABAB(1a) to the cell
surface as well, yet to a smaller extent. Even in
GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT
cotransfections, a few cells per dish showed surface staining (Fig.
2D). The observed plasma membrane targeting of
GABAB(1a) by GABAB(2)
cc
and GABAB(2)
CT may result from both additional
interaction sites between GABAB(1) and
GABAB(2) located outside their C termini and the
strong overexpression of the two membrane proteins in transiently
transfected cells. Furthermore, the C terminus of
GABAB(2) expressed as a cytoplasmic protein
(Flag-GABAB(2)CT) prevented retention of
GABAB(1a), whereas the C terminus of
GABAB(2) lacking the coiled-coil sequence
(Flag-GABAB(2)CT
cc) did not (Fig. 2D). These
data substantiate recent reports on a role for the coiled-coil
interaction in masking the retention signal in
GABAB(1) (Calver et al., 2001
; Margeta-Mitrovic
et al., 2000
; Pagano et al., 2001
).
|
A new aspect of the molecular determinants of
GABAB(1) retention emerged when studying surface
trafficking of two of our mutants. GABAB(1a)
cc
and GABAB(2)_1CT922-960 have an intact ER
retention signal RSRR but are still very efficiently transported to the cell surface (Fig. 2, B and C). In the construct
GABAB(1a)
cc, the 35 codons encoding the
putative coiled-coil sequence, directly upstream of the sequence for
the retention signal, have been deleted. In
GABAB(2)_1CT922-960, the C terminus of
GABAB(1a) distal of the coiled-coil region but
including the retention signal was fused to the end of the coiled-coil
region in GABAB(2) (Fig. 1). These data suggest
that sequences upstream of the RSRR signal are required for
intracellular retention of the receptor.
The GABAB Receptor C Termini Are Not Necessary for Agonist-Mediated Effector Coupling
Coupling to Adenylyl Cyclase. We next examined whether C-terminal domains in GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) play a role in effector coupling. HEK293 cells were transiently cotransfected with combinations of wild-type or deletion mutants of the GABAB receptor subunits, and the effect of receptor activation on FSK-induced intracellular cAMP accumulation was measured. In all experiments, protein levels of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) mutants were controlled by Western blotting (data not shown) and [3H]CGP54626 binding. Binding-active protein levels of GABAB(1a) and derived mutants in cotransfected HEK293 cells were comparable with 0.5 to 1.5 × 106 receptors/cell.
In HEK293 cells producing wild-type GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2) receptors, saturating concentrations of the GABA-ergic agonists GABA (500 µM, Fig. 3A) and (R)-baclofen (500 µM, Fig. 3A and 100 µM, Fig. 4A) inhibited 2 µM FSK-stimulated cAMP production by 40 to 60%. This inhibition could be antagonized by the GABAB(1)-specific antagonists SCH50911 and CGP54626 (Figs. 3A and 4A). Coiled-coil deletion mutants (Fig. 3A) and GABAB(2) mutants, examined in combination with either GABAB(1a) (Fig. 4A) or GABAB(1a)
CT (Fig. 4B), which ensures its unrestricted surface expression (Fig. 2B), did not show a
significant difference in cAMP coupling compared with the wild-type
combination. One exception was GABAB(2)
CT,
which in combination with GABAB(1a) showed
reduced inhibition of FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation compared with
either the wild-type GABAB receptor (p < 0.05) or the double deletion mutant
GABAB(1a)
CT + GABAB(2)
CT (p < 0.05).
|
|
Coupling to K+ Currents.
To
investigate GABAB receptor regulation of
potassium currents, we reconstituted GABAB
receptor heterodimers of wild-type and/or mutated
GABAB receptor subunits with GIRK1 and GIRK2 in HEK293 cells. Baclofen (or GABA) application to HEK293 cells led to
robust increases in potassium conductance through GIRK-activation in
the presence of all tested combinations by 57 to 150% (Figs. 3B and
4), except for GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
cc (Fig. 3B),
GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT,
and GABAB(1a)
CT + GABAB(2)
CT (Fig. 4 and Table 1). The smaller
(p < 0.01) conductance increases compared with wild-type may have resulted from reduced surface expression, as shown
for GABAB(2)
CT when expressed alone (Fig. 2C)
or for GABAB(1a) in the combinations mentioned
above (Fig. 2D). However, 6 of 25 cells transfected with
GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT
and two of nine cells transfected with
GABAB(1a)
CT + GABAB(2)
CT showed GIRK-current activation
comparable with other deletion mutants [68.1 ± 20% (n = 6) and 49.4% (n = 2)]. This is
consistent with the observation that only a small fraction of cells
transfected with GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT expresses
GABAB(1a) on the cell surface. Thus,
GIRK-activation is also possible in the absence of
GABAB receptor C termini.
Coupling to Ca2+ Currents.
To investigate
GABA-ergic inhibition of neuronal calcium channel currents, we
microinjected plasmids encoding wild-type and/or mutated
GABAB receptor subunits into the nucleus of SCG
neurons. In SCG neurons that endogenously express
GABAB(1a) and calcium channels, a significant
(p < 0.05) baclofen-mediated inhibition of calcium
conductance was obtained only when GABAB(2) was
injected (Fig. 3C; see also Filippov et al., 2000
). An increased
(p < 0.05) calcium current inhibition was observed
when coinjecting GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2), GABAB(1a)
cc + GABAB(2), and
GABAB(1a)
cc + GABAB(2)
cc (Fig. 3C). Similar to the results
in GIRK channel coupling in HEK293 cells, injection of
GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
cc
(Fig. 3C) or GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT (Fig. 4A) resulted in a smaller
(p < 0.05) calcium current inhibition in SCG neurons
(see Discussion). Thus, the cytoplasmic C-terminal domains
of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) do not seem to be involved in the agonist-activated G-protein coupling of
GABAB receptors in either HEK293 cells or neurons.
GABAB Receptor Antagonists Increase cAMP Levels in Cotransfected HEK293 Cells
When performing cAMP assays, we observed that antagonists not only
block GABA-ergic agonist-mediated cAMP decrease but also increase cAMP
levels above those induced with FSK alone (Fig. 4). We therefore looked
at the direct effect of the antagonists SCH50911 and CGP54626 on
FSK-induced cAMP levels and found that both antagonists increased cAMP
accumulation up to 100% (Fig. 5A).
The EC50 values of
1.67 ± 0.51 µM for SCH50911 (n = 4) and 6.7 ± 1.1 nM (n = 3) for CGP54626 were greater
than their dissociation constants [IC50 = 0.43 ± 0.04 µM for SCH50911 (Kaupmann et al., 1998
),
KD = 1.3 ± 0.1 nM for CGP54626;
data not shown]. Treating transfected HEK293 cells with 100 ng/ml
pertussis toxin, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates
Gi and Go, for 16 h
before assay eliminated both the Gi-mediated
inhibition of FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation by GABA or
(R)-baclofen (not shown) as well as the increase of
FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation by SCH50911 or CGP54626 (Fig. 5C).
These antagonists also increased basal cAMP levels up to 60% (not
shown). However, basal cAMP levels are near the detection limit of our
assay, so dose-response curves were not measured.
|
Interestingly, both antagonists had no effect on FSK-induced cAMP
levels in HEK293 cells cotransfected with
GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2)
cc
(Fig. 5, A and D). In HEK293 cells expressing
GABAB(1a)
cc together with
GABAB(2), the EC50 values
with 216 nM for SCH50911 and 2.4 nM for CGP54626 were near the
dissociation constant values of these ligands for the wild-type
receptor but the efficacy (maximal increase of FSK-stimulated cAMP
accumulation) was about 4-fold lower (Fig. 5A). Protein levels of the
various receptor subunits were similar in all three combinations as
detected by Western blot (Fig. 5B) and [3H]CGP54626 binding. Because
deletion of the coiled-coil region in GABAB(2)
abolished this inverse agonist effect, we analyzed various combinations
of GABAB(1a) and
GABAB(1a)
CT with
GABAB(2) deletion mutants (Fig. 5D and Table 1).
HEK293 cells cotransfected with GABAB(1a) and
GABAB(2) deletions that lack the coiled-coil
region (i.e., GABAB(2)
cc and
GABAB(2)
CT) did not show an increase in
FSK-stimulated cAMP levels, whereas cotransfection with
GABAB(2)
820-940,
GABAB(2)
748-780, or
GABAB(2)
CT+cc showed an effect similar to that
of the wild-type. If GABAB(1a) was replaced by
GABAB(1a)
CT in cotransfected HEK293 cells, the efficacy decreased to values similar to those with
GABAB(1)
cc + GABAB(2)
(Fig. 5, A and D). In contrast to GABAB(1a),
however, GABAB(1a)
CT together with
GABAB(2)
748-780 or
GABAB(2)
CT+cc showed no significant inverse
agonism (Fig. 5D and Table 1). In these two mutants, the coiled-coil
region is located closer to the end of transmembrane domain 7 than in
the wild-type GABAB(2) protein (see Fig. 1) which
might affect receptor conformation. Thus, the C termini of both
GABAB(1) and GABAB(2), and
especially their ability to form a coiled coil, are important for
allowing the receptor to adopt an activated conformation without an
agonist bound.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physical Interaction And Trafficking of GABAB Receptor
Subunits.
Despite recent advances in our understanding of
GABAB receptor heteromerization, the exact
molecular determinants mediating the interaction between the two
subunits are still unknown. Our data indicate that heteromerization and
trafficking are strongly based on the coiled-coil interaction between
the C termini of GABAB(1) and
GABAB(2). At the same time, we found that
deletion of the coiled-coil domains in GABAB(1)
and GABAB(2) subunits did not completely abolish
their physical interaction. Furthermore, GABAB(2)
mutants lacking the coiled-coil domain led to significant surface
expression of GABAB(1) and to a decreased, but
significant amount of functional GABAB receptor
heteromers (Fig. 3 and 4, GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
cc and GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT). These data are in accordance
with recent reports, which were published as this study was in progress
(Calver et al., 2001
; Pagano et al., 2001
) and suggest that besides the
coiled-coil regions, additional interaction sites outside the C termini
are responsible for the coassembly of the two
GABAB receptor subunits. At least three observations speak in favor of an N-terminal interaction without excluding intramembranous interactions:
GABAB(1e), a splice variant encoding an
N-terminal fragment of GABAB(1), can compete with full-length GABAB(1) for binding to
GABAB(2) (Schwarz et al., 2000
);
GABAB(2) contributes to high-affinity agonist
binding (Jones et al., 1998
; Kaupmann et al., 1998
); and the
extracellular domains of both GABAB(1) and
GABAB(2) are involved in the mechanisms of receptor activation (Galvez et al., 2001
). Indeed, other C family GPCRs
form intermolecular disulfide bridges between their N-terminal extracellular domains and also show noncovalent interactions to support
dimerization (Romano et al., 2001
; Zhang et al., 2001
).
|
Molecular Determinants for Coupling of GABAB Receptors
with Effector Systems.
Type C metabotropic receptors, such as the
metabotropic glutamate receptors, couple to G-proteins via residues in
their second and third intracellular loops (Gomeza et al., 1996
). These
residues are not conserved at parallel positions in
GABAB(1), thereby raising the possibility that
other loci within the intracellular loops or in the intracellular C
termini of GABAB receptors mediate G-protein coupling. We therefore probed the ability of C-terminal mutants of
GABAB(1) and of GABAB(2) to
couple with each of their three main effector systems (i.e., adenylyl
cyclase, GIRKs, and calcium channels).
cc, GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)
CT and
GABAB(1a)
CT + GABAB(2)
CT). Comparison of effector coupling
of GABAB receptor mutants versus their surface
expression in our study clearly demonstrated that the C terminus of
neither GABAB(1) nor of
GABAB(2) is required for effector-coupling
provided that the subunit combination reaches the cell surface
effectively. These results, which are in perfect accordance with recent
reports (Calver et al., 2001Constitutive Activity of GABAB Receptors.
Our data
indicate that CGP54626 and SCH50911, which are well known as
GABAB receptor antagonists, are also able to
function as inverse agonists, because in GABAB
receptor-expressing HEK293 cells, both ligands increase FSK-stimulated
cAMP levels up to 2-fold. Being sensitive to treatment with pertussis
toxin, this effect depends on a functional G-protein of the
Gi/o class. Our observations imply that CGP54626
and SCH50911 shift the GABAB receptor to a
conformation that is less accessible to Gi
, thus allowing higher activation of adenylyl cyclase. These results indicate that the GABAB receptor has the
potential for constitutive activity. Galvez et al. (2001)
observed a
slight increase in the basal level of inositol phosphate formation in
HEK293 cells expressing wild-type GABAB
receptors. A large increase in the basal inositol phosphate formation
was detectable in cells expressing GABAB receptor dimers consisting of GABAB(1a) and a chimeric
GABAB(2) subunit, in which the extracellular
domain has been replaced by that of GABAB(1a).
This large increase in inositol phosphate could be partly inhibited by
GABA and this inhibition could be antagonized by CGP64213.
Conclusions. Interaction of the two subunits of the GABAB receptor occurs not only through the coiled-coil domains but also through low affinity interaction sites, probably located within N-terminal extracellular domains and/or membrane spanning regions. Whereas the C termini of the two subunits are not necessary for functional heterodimerization, their coiled-coil domains are involved in stabilizing the active conformation of the heterodimer. Furthermore, efficient trafficking of GABAB(1) to the cell surface requires interaction via the coiled-coil domain. Notably, the retention signal of GABAB(1) requires a part of its coiled-coil sequence.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank G. Eichberger, G. Eisenhardt, F. Herzog, A. Hesselschwerdt, and K. Hirschfeld for excellent technical assistance.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 9, 2001; Accepted January 25, 2002
1 Current address: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
2 Current address: Department of Molecular Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
3 Current address: Department of Physiology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
4 Current address: Center for Molecular Neurobiology (ZMNH), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
This work was supported by Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie grant 0311633.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Sylvia Grünewald, Axaron Bioscience AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 515, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: gruenewald{at}axaron.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
GPCR, G-protein
coupled receptor;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
bp, base pair(s);
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
cc, coiled-coil domain;
NGS, normal goat serum;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
FSK, forskolin;
GIRK, G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium
channel;
SCG, superior cervical ganglion;
SCH50911, (+)-(2S)-5,5-dimethyl-2-morpholineacetic acid;
CGP54626, [S-(R*,R*)]-[3-[[1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino]-2-hydroxypropyl](cyclohexylmethyl)
phosphinic acid;
BAPTA, 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Pooler and R. A. J. McIlhinney Lateral Diffusion of the GABAB Receptor Is Regulated by the GABAB2 C Terminus J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25349 - 25356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Mukherjee, E. W. McBride, M. Beinborn, K. Dunlap, and A. S. Kopin Point Mutations in Either Subunit of the GABAB Receptor Confer Constitutive Activity to the Heterodimer Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1406 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Fleck Glutamate Receptors and Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control: Looking beneath the Surface Neuroscientist, June 1, 2006; 12(3): 232 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Dai and J. J. Galligan Differential Trafficking and Desensitization of Human ETA and ETB Receptors Expressed in HEK 293 Cells. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gassmann, C. Haller, Y. Stoll, S. A. Aziz, B. Biermann, J. Mosbacher, K. Kaupmann, and B. Bettler The RXR-Type Endoplasmic Reticulum-Retention/Retrieval Signal of GABAB1 Requires Distant Spacing from the Membrane to Function Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 137 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Mah, E. Cornell, N. A. Mitchell, and M. W. Fleck Glutamate Receptor Trafficking: Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control Involves Ligand Binding and Receptor Function J. Neurosci., March 2, 2005; 25(9): 2215 - 2225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kanki, S. Kupershmidt, T. Yang, S. Wells, and D. M. Roden A Structural Requirement for Processing the Cardiac K+ Channel KCNQ1 J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33976 - 33983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Binet, C. Brajon, L. Le Corre, F. Acher, J.-P. Pin, and L. Prezeau The Heptahelical Domain of GABAB2 Is Activated Directly by CGP7930, a Positive Allosteric Modulator of the GABAB Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29085 - 29091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bettler, K. Kaupmann, J. Mosbacher, and M. Gassmann Molecular Structure and Physiological Functions of GABAB Receptors Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 835 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Syme, K. L. Hamilton, H. M. Jones, A. C. Gerlach, L. Giltinan, G. D. Papworth, S. C. Watkins, N. A. Bradbury, and D. C. Devor Trafficking of the Ca2+-activated K+ Channel, hIK1, Is Dependent upon a C-terminal Leucine Zipper J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8476 - 8486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||