MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grünewald, S.
Right arrow Articles by Köhr, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grünewald, S.
Right arrow Articles by Köhr, G.

Vol. 61, Issue 5, 1070-1080, May 2002


Importance of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidB Receptor C-Termini for G-Protein Coupling

Sylvia Grünewald, Bettina J. Schupp, Stephen R. Ikeda,1 Rohini Kuner,2 Frank Steigerwald,3 Hans-Christian Kornau,4 and Georg Köhr

Axaron Bioscience AG, Heidelberg, Germany (S.G., R.K., H.-C.K.); Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany (B.J.S., G.K., F.S.); Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, Guthrie Research Institute, Sayre, Pennsylvania (S.R.I.)

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Functional gamma -aminobutyric acidB (GABAB) receptors assemble from two subunits, GABAB(1) and GABAB(2). This heteromerization, which involves a C-terminal coiled-coil interaction, ensures efficient surface trafficking and agonist-dependent G-protein activation. In the present study, we took a closer look at the implications of the intracellular C termini of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) for G-protein coupling. We generated a series of C-terminal mutants of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) and tested them for physical interaction, surface trafficking, coupling to adenylyl cyclase, and G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells as well as on endogenous calcium channels in sympathetic neurons of the superior cervical ganglion (SCG). We found that the C-terminal interaction contributes only partly to the heterodimeric assembly of the subunits, indicating the presence of an additional interaction site. The described endoplasmic reticulum retention signal within the C terminus of GABAB(1) functioned only in the context of specific amino acids, which constitute part of the GABAB(1) coiled-coil sequence. This finding may provide a link between the retention signal and its shielding by the coiled coil of GABAB(2). In HEK293 cells, we observed that the two well-known GABAB receptor antagonists [S-(R*,R*)]-[3-[[1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino]-2-hydroxypropyl](cyclohexylmethyl) phosphinic acid (CGP54626) and (+)-(2S)-5,5-dimethyl-2-morpholineacetic acid (SCH50911) CGP54626 and SCH50911 function as inverse agonists. The C termini of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) strongly influenced agonist-independent G-protein coupling, although they were not necessary for agonist-dependent G-protein coupling. The C-terminal GABAB receptor mutants described here demonstrate that the active receptor conformation is stabilized by the coiled-coil interaction. Thus, the C-terminal conformation of the GABAB receptor may determine its constitutive activity, which could be a therapeutic target for inverse agonists.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

GABAB receptors mediate metabotropic functions of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA via activation of G-proteins of the Gi/o class. They inhibit adenylyl cyclase and modulate the activity of calcium and potassium channels, thereby controlling presynaptic neurotransmitter release and postsynaptic inhibitory potentials (Bowery, 1993). Impaired GABAB receptor function is associated with pathophysiological effects, including pain, epilepsy, spasticity, and cognitive deficits (Couve et al., 2000), which was recently highlighted in mice deficient for a GABAB receptor subunit (Prosser et al., 2001; Schuler et al., 2001).

Thus far, two GABAB receptor subunits, termed GABAB(1) and GABAB(2), have been cloned (Kaupmann et al., 1997, 1998; Jones et al., 1998; White et al., 1998; Kuner et al., 1999; Ng et al., 1999). Both subtypes exist in several splice forms, the most prominent being two N-terminal splice forms of GABAB(1), GABAB(1a), and GABAB(1b), whereby the first 147 residues in GABAB(1a) are replaced with 18 different residues in GABAB(1b) (Kaupmann et al., 1997). GABAB receptors belong to the C family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which also comprises metabotropic glutamate, Ca2+-sensing, and vomeronasal receptors. They all have an unusually large N-terminal, extracellular ligand binding domain that shows similarity to bacterial periplasmic amino acid binding proteins (Couve et al., 2000). Although GPCRs were earlier generally believed to function as monomers, several GPCRs have been recently shown to exist as homo- as well as heterodimers that are functional and play important roles in signaling (Salahpour et al., 2000). C-family GPCRs are likely to function as dimers (Romano et al., 1996; Bai et al., 1999); also, A-family GPCRs (e.g., opioid receptor subtypes or dopamine and somatostatin receptors) have been shown to form homodimers and heterodimers, thereby creating new receptors with altered ligand binding and functional properties (Jordan and Devi, 1999; Rocheville et al., 2000a,b). GABAB receptors are unique in that complete functional activity depends on the formation of heteromers between GABAB(1) and GABAB(2). The monomeric receptor molecules alone are not able to reproduce the pharmacological properties of native GABAB receptors. Both splice forms GABAB(1a) and GABAB(1b) show lower affinity for agonists than native receptors but bind GABAB receptor antagonists with native affinity. GABAB(2) has not yet been shown to bind GABA-ergic ligands with appreciable affinity (Jones et al., 1998; Kaupmann et al., 1998). However, coexpression of GABAB(2) with GABAB(1) restores high-affinity agonist binding as well as regulation of intracellular effector systems (Jones et al., 1998; Kaupmann et al., 1998; White et al., 1998; Kuner et al., 1999; Ng et al., 1999). G-protein coupling seems to mainly involve intracellular loops of GABAB(2), but efficient G-protein coupling requires allosteric interactions of GABAB(1) with GABAB(2) (Galvez et al., 2001; Robbins et al., 2001).

GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) associate, at least partly, through a coiled-coil motif forming a parallel coiled-coil helix found in their respective C termini (Kammerer et al., 1999; Kuner et al., 1999). When expressed alone in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells or sympathetic neurons, GABAB(1) is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Couve et al., 1998) due to a C-terminal retention motif [RXR(R)] (Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000), which is located C-terminal of its coiled-coil region. Through this coiled-coil interaction, GABAB(2) masks the retention signal present in GABAB(1), thus enabling surface expression of functional GABAB receptors (Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000; Calver et al., 2001; Pagano et al., 2001).

Despite the discovery of structural elements for retention and interaction of GABAB receptor subunits, a detailed understanding of the functional role of GABAB receptor C termini is still lacking. The apparent interdependence of heterodimerization, surface trafficking and efficient G-protein coupling in vivo made it difficult to assess the exact molecular function of single domains or interactions within the GABAB receptor dimer. Thus, the aim of our study was to dissect these functions and to examine the role of defined C-terminal domains in heteromerization and signaling. We constructed several C-terminal mutant proteins of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) and analyzed heterodimerization, cell surface expression, G-protein coupling, and constitutive activity in cotransfected HEK293 cells and in sympathetic neurons of the superior cervical ganglion (SCG).

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Construction of Mutant Receptor Subunits. Cloning of full-length rat GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) sequences was described in Kuner et al. (1999). The truncated and chimeric versions of GABAB(1a) were generated by PCR and subcloning of the PCR products into the PstI (bp 2281) and SalI sites of GABAB(1) in pBlueScript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). In GABAB(1a)Delta CT and GABAB(1a)Delta 924-960, respectively, either the whole C terminus (amino acids R862 to K960) or amino acids R924 to K960 after the coiled-coil region were deleted. In the chimeric constructs GABAB(1a)_2CT817-940 and GABAB(1a)_2CT, either the C-terminal sequence of GABAB(1a) after the coiled-coil sequence (i.e., amino acids R924-K960) or the whole GABAB(1a) C terminus (amino acids R857-K960) was exchanged by overlap extension PCR for the equivalent sequences in GABAB(2) (i.e., amino acids D817-L940 or amino acids I744-L940, respectively). GABAB(1a)Delta cc was constructed by ligating annealed complementary oligonucleotides with appropriate overhangs into the BclI (bp 2576) and NarI (bp 2772) sites of GABAB(1a), yielding deletion of the coiled-coil encoding sequence (bp 2659-2763 encoding amino acids S887-L921). To allow surface detection of GABAB(1a) mutants, the sequence for the c-myc epitope was inserted behind the sequence of the predicted signal peptide by overlap extension PCR resulting in the encoded protein sequence 14LGAEQKLISEEDLNGGA19 (c-myc epitope, including an additional N printed in bold).

In GABAB(2)Delta 820-940 and GABAB(2)Delta CT, the codons for amino acids E820-L940 and F761-L940 were deleted by PCR. For construction of GABAB(2)Delta 748-780 and GABAB(2)Delta CT+cc, two PCR fragments were generated that could be ligated through BamHI, thereby replacing the codons covering the sequence between the end of transmembrane 7 and the coiled-coil sequence (amino acids T748-N780) by a single isoleucine codon (ATC). In GABAB(2)Delta CT+cc the C-terminal sequence (amino acids E820-L940 after the GABAB(2) coiled-coil region) was deleted additionally. The coiled-coil deletion construct GABAB(2)Delta cc and the chimeric construct GABAB(2)_1CT922-960 were made by overlap extension PCR. In GABAB(2)Delta cc amino acids S785-Q816 were deleted. For generating the chimeric construct GABAB(2)_1CT922-960, the GABAB(1) C-terminal sequence (amino acids R922-K960 after the coiled-coil sequence) was amplified and exchanged for the corresponding C-terminal end of GABAB(2) (amino acids P819-L940) by overlap extension PCR. All constructs were cloned into a CMV expression vector (Schall et al., 1990). For constructing Flag-GABAB(2)CT and Flag-GABAB(2)CTDelta cc, the C-terminal fragments (starting at I744) of GABAB(2) and GABAB(2)Delta cc were amplified by PCR and cloned into a CMV expression vector (Schall et al., 1990) in frame behind the Flag-tag sequence, allowing the production of N-terminally Flag-tagged proteins. All constructs were verified by sequencing and are schematically shown in Fig. 1.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic outline of GABAB receptor subunit constructs. N, large extracellular N-terminal domain; 7TM, domain including the seven transmembrane helices; cc, predicted coiled-coil region in both the C terminus of GABAB(1) (R1) and GABAB(2) (R2); RSRR, endoplasmic reticulum retention signal; F, Flag-tag (red); C, C terminus, which is depicted as enlarged relative to other domains.

Antibodies. The GABAB(1)-specific polyclonal antiserum was bought from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA) and is directed against the last 20 amino acids (941-960) in GABAB(1a). GABAB(2) -specific antisera were raised against two synthetic peptides, one derived from amino acids 203 to 222 in the N-terminal extracellular domain (DVQRFSEVRNDLTGVLYGED-amid) and the second corresponding to amino acids 831 to 850 in the C terminus of GABAB(2) (QELNDILSLGNFTESTDGGK-amid). Peptide synthesis, antibody generation and purification were done by ARK Scientific GmbH Biosystems (Darmstadt, Germany). The titers of the crude sera (as defined in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test as the reciprocal of the serum dilution resulting in an OD492 of 0.2 when using 1 µg of free antigen on the solid phase per well) were 66,000 for the serum recognizing the N-terminally located peptide sequence and 300,000 for the serum recognizing the C-terminally located peptide sequence, respectively. For detection of the myc epitope tag, a rabbit polyclonal anti-Myc tag IgG antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) was used. Peroxidase- and tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies were bought from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).

Cell Culture and Transfection. HEK293 cells were maintained in modified Eagle's medium (MEM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and PenStrep at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were transfected at 70% confluence with 25 µg of total DNA for a 15-cm plate or 2.5 µg of DNA for a 24-well coverslip by calcium phosphate precipitation. Cells were incubated for 2 days before testing expression of recombinant proteins or performing functional assays.

Receptor Binding Assays. Transfected cells were harvested, washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or Krebs-Tris buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 118 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, and 5.6 mM glucose) and incubated in PBS or Krebs-Tris-buffer with 10 nM [3H]CGP54626A (Tocris Cookson Ltd., Bristol, UK) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). The incubation was terminated by addition of 3 ml of cold washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and rapid vacuum filtration over Whatman GF/C filters prewashed with 2 ml of washing buffer. The filters were washed twice with 3 ml of cold washing buffer and counted for tritium using a Tri-Carb scintillation counter (Canberra EuriSys GmbH, Rüsselsheim, Germany). Nonspecific binding was determined either with 10 µM CGP54626 or with 2 mM SCH50911 (Tocris Cookson).

Coimmunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis. Transfected HEK293 cells were collected 48 h after transfection and solubilized over night by gentle rotation at 4°C with 2% Triton X-100 in PBS containing 400 mM NaCl and 10% glycerol as well as the protease inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), aprotinin (10 µg/ml), pepstatin A (5 µg/ml), and chymostatin (5 µg/ml). After ultracentrifugation at 100,000g for 1 h at 4°C, the supernatant was diluted 2-fold in PBS and rotated with 1/100 volume (i.e., 8 µl) of preimmuneserum for 1 h at 4°C. For clearance of unspecific immunocomplexes 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were added and incubation continued for 1 h. Then, the supernatant of the protein A-Sepharose beads was rotated with 1/100 volume (i.e., 8 µl) of the GABAB(2) -C terminus-specific anti-peptide antiserum for 1 h at 4°C. Immunocomplexes were precipitated for 1 to 2 h at 4°C again with 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose. The captured immunocomplexes of both the incubation with preimmuneserum and antiserum were washed 4 times with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 and once with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 before eluting into sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 200 mM dithiothreitol, 6% SDS, 10% glycerol, 7 M urea, 0.01% bromphenol blue) at 42°C for 10 min. Samples were resolved through 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk powder in PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20, the nitrocellulose membranes were probed with the GABAB(1)-specific antiserum, diluted 1:2000 in blocking solution, for 1 h at room temperature, followed by three 5-min washes in PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 and incubation with horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-guinea pig antibodies. Bound antibody was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (enhanced chemiluminescence; Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany).

Immunocytochemistry. Cells were seeded and grown on sterile glass coverslips coated with either fibronectin (10 µg/ml) or poly-D-lysine (5 µg/ml) and transfected with various receptor mutant constructs 2 days before immunocytochemical analysis. For analyzing receptor expression, cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed on ice for 10 min in 2% paraformaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde, incubated twice for 5 min each in 50 mM glycine in PBS, and washed with PBS. For permeabilization, cells were incubated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min on ice and blocked for 30 min at RT with 4% normal goat serum (NGS) and 0.2% Triton X-100 in cold PBS. Primary antibody incubations (anti-Myc IgG, 1:200; anti-GABAB(2) antibodies, 1:100 or 1:200) were in 2% NGS and 0.1% Triton X-100 in cold Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) for 2 to 3 h at RT. After three 10 min washes with 1% NGS in TBS at RT, the cells were incubated with donkey-anti-rabbit tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody (1:400) in 1.5% NGS in TBS in the dark for 30 min at RT. After several washing steps, cover slips were mounted and analyzed using a confocal microscope (Leica Mikrosysteme Vertrieb GmbH, Bensheim, Germany).

For localization of receptor proteins at the cell surface, intact cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with the primary antibody in PBS containing 2% NGS for blocking. Then, cells were fixed and incubated with the secondary antibody as described above.

Cellular cAMP Accumulation Assay. Two days before the assay, HEK293 cells plated onto 15-cm plates were cotransfected with various combinations of GABAB receptor subtype mutants. On the day of the assay, the medium was replaced by MEM medium supplemented with 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma) and the cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were harvested and resuspended to 2.5 × 106 cells/ml in Krebs-Tris buffer supplemented with 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine. These cells (200 µl; 0.5 × 106 cells) were added to tubes containing either no drugs (basal activity), 2 µM forskolin (FSK), or 2 µM FSK plus GABA-ergic agonists [e.g., 100 µM (R)-baclofen (Tocris Cookson)] or antagonists [e.g., 10 µM CGP54626 (Tocris Cookson)] as indicated in the figure legend. After 20 min at 37°C, the tubes were placed on ice and lysed in 167 mM HCl. The lysate was incubated on ice for at least 1 h and, after neutralization with NaOH, was centrifuged at 15,000g to remove cell debris. The cellular production of cAMP was measured in the supernatant using the commercially available cAMP 3H assay system from Amersham Biosciences. Experiments were performed at least twice in duplicate. The significance of differences was evaluated using unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-tests.

Coupling to GIRKs. Coexpression of GIRK1 and GIRK2 with GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) wild-type or mutant constructs was as described by Kuner et al. (1999). Transfected cells on coverslips were transferred to the stage of an inverted microscope and were continuously perfused with a solution containing 115 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, and 10 mM glucose, pH 7.25, adjusted with NaOH. The whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique was applied at RT with pipette solutions containing 115 mM K-gluconate, 20 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM EGTA, 4 mM MgATP, and 0.3 mM NaGTP, pH 7.25, adjusted with KOH. GABA (100 µM) or (R)-baclofen (50 µM) was dissolved in the extracellular solution and was applied steadily to single cells by a double-barreled application pipette. The inward rectifier currents were activated by voltage ramp generation. For analysis, GIRK-currents in the absence and presence of agonist were compared at -135 mV. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and p-values represent the result of independent two-tailed t-tests.

Ca2+-Channel Current Recordings. Superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons were isolated and injected with cDNA as described previously (Ikeda, 1996; Ikeda, 1997). Briefly, SCG neurons were enzymatically dissociated from adult rats and then plated onto polystyrene culture dishes (35 mm), coated with poly-L-lysine, and maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2 at 37°C. GABAB receptor subunits were expressed by intranuclear microinjection (0.1 µg/µl per cDNA construct). Electrophysiological recordings were made within 24 h after injection of vectors. Injected neurons were identified by fluorescence from coexpressed jellyfish green fluorescent protein (enhanced green fluorescent protein; BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA).

Ca2+ channel currents were recorded at RT using the whole-cell variant of the patch-clamp technique as described previously (Ikeda, 1996). To isolate Ca2+ currents, patch electrodes were filled with a solution containing 125 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine methanesulfonate, 20 mM tetraethylammonium Cl, 15 mM CsCl, 10 mM BAPTA, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 4 mM MgATP, 0.1 mM GTP, 5 mM di-Tris phosphocreatine, pH 7.2 (304 mOsm/kg H2O). The external recording solution contained 145 mM tetraethylammonium methanesulfonate, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM CaCl2, 15 mM glucose, 0.0003 mM tetrodotoxin, pH 7.4 (328 mOsm/kg H2O). Agonists were applied to single neurons via a gravity-fed fused silica capillary tube connected to an array of seven polyethylene tubes. The outlet of the perfusion system was located within 100 µm of the cell. Drug application was started by switching the control external solution to a drug-containing solution. Calcium currents were evoked by a depolarizing pulse to +10 mV from a holding potential of -80 mV. Current amplitude was measured 10 ms after the onset of the test pulse. The inhibition of Ca2+ channel currents was tested with noradrenaline and was comparable in uninjected and injected neurons (not shown). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; p-values were determined by analysis of variance followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Interactions between Coiled-Coil Deletion Mutants of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2)

To assess the role of C-terminal domains of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) for interaction, trafficking, and function of the GABAB receptor, we generated a series of deletion mutants (Fig. 1). These include specific deletions of the 35 and 32 amino acids in GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2), respectively, which have been shown to mediate a coiled-coil interaction (Kuner et al., 1999; GABAB(1a)Delta cc and GABAB(2)Delta cc). To test the importance of the C-terminal coiled-coil interaction for the integrity of the GABAB receptor, we performed coimmunoprecipitations using full-length proteins. Combinations of wild-type and coiled-coil deletion constructs were cotransfected into HEK293 cells and GABAB(2) or GABAB(2)Delta cc was immunoprecipitated from Triton X-100 extracts with preimmuneserum (PIS) followed by an antiserum (AS) directed against the C terminus of GABAB(2). The immunoprecipitated protein was blotted and analyzed for coprecipitation of GABAB(1a) or GABAB(1a)Delta cc (Fig. 2A). GABAB(2) not only precipitated GABAB(1a) but also GABAB(1a)Delta cc. Furthermore, GABAB(2)Delta cc was also able to precipitate GABAB(1a) and GABAB(1a)Delta cc. In all cases, the appropriate preimmuneserum did not lead to precipitation of GABAB(1a) or GABAB(1a)Delta cc (Fig. 2A, PIS). Coimmunoprecipitation of GABAB receptor wild-type proteins was most efficient (Fig. 2A, AS). We also analyzed the interaction of the soluble C-terminal fragments of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2). In both yeast two-hybrid assays and glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays, deletion of the coiled-coil region in one of the fragments abolished the interaction (not shown). These data suggest that interaction domains outside the cytoplasmic C termini of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2), in addition to the coiled-coil domains within the cytoplasmic C termini, mediate assembly of GABAB receptor heteromers.


View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, coimmunoprecipitation of GABAB(1a) (R1a) and GABAB(2) (R2) coiled-coil deletion mutants. Extracts from HEK293 cells cotransfected with the indicated constructs were immunoprecipitated with the GABAB(2) -specific antiserum recognizing the C terminus (AS) or the appropriate preimmuneserum (PIS). The immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted for GABAB(1) (C, SDS-cell extract; S, solubilized protein fraction used for immunoprecipitation). B to D, surface trafficking of mutated GABAB receptor subunits. HEK293 cells grown on glass coverslips were transfected with constructs encoding either wild-type or mutant forms of GABAB(1a) (B), GABAB(2) (C), or both (D). All GABAB(1a) constructs were tagged N-terminally with a c-myc epitope recognized by a polyclonal anti-myc antibody (mycR1a). Two days after transfection, the cells were examined by immunofluorescence using the anti-myc antibody or a GABAB(2)-specific polyclonal antiserum directed against the N terminus without [surface staining (ST)] or with permeabilization (P). The bottom panels in B and C are controls (R1a, nontagged wild-type GABAB(1a) ; PIS, preimmuneserum). D, insets, immunofluorescence of the soluble Flag-tagged GABAB(2) constructs using the GABAB(2)C terminus-specific antiserum. Immunofluorescence analysis was done on at least three independent transfections for all combinations shown with consistent results. Scale bar, 10 µm.

C-Terminal Determinants of GABAB Receptor Surface Expression

In the absence of GABAB(2), GABAB(1a) is retained in the ER (Couve et al., 1998). However, GABAB(1a) efficiently reaches the cell surface after coexpression of GABAB(2) (White et al., 1998; Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000).

We tested the relevance of C-terminal stretches of the two subunits for GABAB receptor trafficking. The plasma membrane targeting of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) mutants expressed in HEK293 cells was examined by immunocytochemistry using antisera directed against extracellular N-terminal epitopes. This enabled staining of receptors targeted to the cell membrane in nonpermeabilized cells [surface staining (ST)] compared with those present at the membrane and in the cell interior in detergent permeabilized cells (P) (Fig. 2, B-D).

All GABAB(1a) deletion and chimeric mutants were expressed to a similar extent and, except for the full-length GABAB(1a) protein, were all found to be located at the plasma membrane (Fig. 2B). All GABAB(2) mutants were expressed at the cell surface, but in GABAB(2)Delta CT transfections, comparably fewer cells were found to be surface stained and staining was less intense (Fig. 2C). The total expression of GABAB(2)Delta 748-780 and GABAB(2)Delta CT+cc seemed to be lower than that of the remaining GABAB(2) mutants (Western blot data not shown). In cotransfected HEK293 cells, all GABAB(2) mutants which still possessed the coiled-coil region (i.e., GABAB(2)Delta 820-940, GABAB(2)_1CT922-960, GABAB(2)Delta 748-780, and GABAB(2)Delta CT+cc) were able to traffick GABAB(1a) to the cell surface; GABAB(2)Delta 820-940 was the most efficient (Fig. 2D and Table 1). Interestingly, GABAB(2) subunits lacking the coiled-coil domain were able to traffick GABAB(1a) to the cell surface as well, yet to a smaller extent. Even in GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT cotransfections, a few cells per dish showed surface staining (Fig. 2D). The observed plasma membrane targeting of GABAB(1a) by GABAB(2)Delta cc and GABAB(2)Delta CT may result from both additional interaction sites between GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) located outside their C termini and the strong overexpression of the two membrane proteins in transiently transfected cells. Furthermore, the C terminus of GABAB(2) expressed as a cytoplasmic protein (Flag-GABAB(2)CT) prevented retention of GABAB(1a), whereas the C terminus of GABAB(2) lacking the coiled-coil sequence (Flag-GABAB(2)CTDelta cc) did not (Fig. 2D). These data substantiate recent reports on a role for the coiled-coil interaction in masking the retention signal in GABAB(1) (Calver et al., 2001; Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000; Pagano et al., 2001).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Coupling of recombinant GABAB receptors to effectors and surface localizaton of myc-tagged GABAB(1a) mutants

HEK293 cells were cotransfected with the constructs indicated and surface immunostaining as well as coupling to adenylyl cyclase and GIRKs was measured as outlined under Materials and Methods. Inhibition of Ca2+ currents was measured in SCG neurons.

A new aspect of the molecular determinants of GABAB(1) retention emerged when studying surface trafficking of two of our mutants. GABAB(1a)Delta cc and GABAB(2)_1CT922-960 have an intact ER retention signal RSRR but are still very efficiently transported to the cell surface (Fig. 2, B and C). In the construct GABAB(1a)Delta cc, the 35 codons encoding the putative coiled-coil sequence, directly upstream of the sequence for the retention signal, have been deleted. In GABAB(2)_1CT922-960, the C terminus of GABAB(1a) distal of the coiled-coil region but including the retention signal was fused to the end of the coiled-coil region in GABAB(2) (Fig. 1). These data suggest that sequences upstream of the RSRR signal are required for intracellular retention of the receptor.

The GABAB Receptor C Termini Are Not Necessary for Agonist-Mediated Effector Coupling

Coupling to Adenylyl Cyclase. We next examined whether C-terminal domains in GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) play a role in effector coupling. HEK293 cells were transiently cotransfected with combinations of wild-type or deletion mutants of the GABAB receptor subunits, and the effect of receptor activation on FSK-induced intracellular cAMP accumulation was measured. In all experiments, protein levels of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) mutants were controlled by Western blotting (data not shown) and [3H]CGP54626 binding. Binding-active protein levels of GABAB(1a) and derived mutants in cotransfected HEK293 cells were comparable with 0.5 to 1.5 × 106 receptors/cell.

In HEK293 cells producing wild-type GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2) receptors, saturating concentrations of the GABA-ergic agonists GABA (500 µM, Fig. 3A) and (R)-baclofen (500 µM, Fig. 3A and 100 µM, Fig. 4A) inhibited 2 µM FSK-stimulated cAMP production by 40 to 60%. This inhibition could be antagonized by the GABAB(1)-specific antagonists SCH50911 and CGP54626 (Figs. 3A and 4A). Coiled-coil deletion mutants (Fig. 3A) and GABAB(2) mutants, examined in combination with either GABAB(1a) (Fig. 4A) or GABAB(1a)Delta CT (Fig. 4B), which ensures its unrestricted surface expression (Fig. 2B), did not show a significant difference in cAMP coupling compared with the wild-type combination. One exception was GABAB(2)Delta CT, which in combination with GABAB(1a) showed reduced inhibition of FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation compared with either the wild-type GABAB receptor (p < 0.05) or the double deletion mutant GABAB(1a)Delta CT + GABAB(2)Delta CT (p < 0.05).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Coupling of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) coiled-coil deletion mutants to effector proteins. A, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. HEK293 cells were cotransfected with the indicated constructs. Two days later the influence of 500 µM (R)-baclofen (R-Bac) or 500 µM GABA in the absence or presence of 2 mM SCH50911 (SCH) on cAMP levels induced by 2 µM FSK was measured as outlined under Materials and Methods. "Basal" indicates cAMP levels in the absence of any drug. FSK-induced cAMP levels were set to 100%. The bar graph shows the percentage of FSK-stimulated cAMP production under the indicated condition. Error bars indicate the S.D. resulting from at least three independent transfections. The asterisks (*p < 0.01) refer to the effect of R-Bac and GABA on FSK-induced cAMP levels. B, GIRK-currents. Representative whole-cell recordings are shown from transfected HEK293 cells expressing functional GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2) receptors and GIRK1 and GIRK2. GIRK-currents (Control), which are barium sensitive (Ba2+), were activated by 50 µM R-Bac. The voltage ramp used for current activation is shown above the current-voltage relationship. The currents represent averages of five current traces. Arrowhead, membrane potential (-135 mV) at which the currents were analyzed. The bar graph compares the GIRK-current increases in the presence of different GABAB deletion mutants (see A) caused by 50 µM R-Bac or 100 µM GABA. Error bars indicate mean ± S.E.M. (n, number of cells recorded). *, p < 0.01 compared with wild-type GABAB receptors. C, calcium channel currents. Representative whole-cell recordings are shown from rat SCG neurons heterologously expressing GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2) in the absence (Control) or presence of 300 µMbaclofen (Bac). Currents were evoked with the double pulse voltage protocol illustrated. Current amplitude was determined 10 ms after the onset of the first test pulse (arrowhead). Horizontal and vertical calibration bars represent 20 ms and 0.5 nA, respectively. The bar graph indicates inhibition of calcium current in the presence of 300 µM Bac after expression of the indicated GABAB combination (see inset in A) in SCG neurons. Error bars indicate mean ± S.E.M. (n, number of neurons recorded). *, p < 0.05 for double-injected neurons compared with GABAB(2)-injected neurons; dagger , p < 0.05 compared with neurons injected with wild-type receptors; #, p < 0.05 for GABAB(2)-injected neurons compared with control cells.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Functional characterization of GABAB receptors consisting of GABAB(1a) (A) or GABAB(1a)Delta CT (B) and GABAB(2) mutants. cAMP accumulation was measured in HEK293 cells cotransfected with the indicated constructs as outlined under Materials and Methods. cAMP production was stimulated using 2 µM FSK and inhibited with 100 µM R-baclofen (R-Bac). R-Bac was antagonized using either 2 mM SCH50911 or 10 µM CGP54626 (Antagonist). Results are presented as described in the legend of Fig. 3A and represent at least two independent experiments. Inhibition was significant (p < 0.01) for all cotransfected combinations as opposed to single GABAB(1a) or GABAB(1a)Delta CT transfections. GIRK-activation and inhibition of Ca2+ channels was done as outlined in the legend to Fig. 3. Asterisks [*, p < 0.01 (GIRKs) and *, p < 0.05 (cAMP level, Ca2+-channels)] refer to reduced effector coupling compared with wild-type.

Coupling to K+ Currents. To investigate GABAB receptor regulation of potassium currents, we reconstituted GABAB receptor heterodimers of wild-type and/or mutated GABAB receptor subunits with GIRK1 and GIRK2 in HEK293 cells. Baclofen (or GABA) application to HEK293 cells led to robust increases in potassium conductance through GIRK-activation in the presence of all tested combinations by 57 to 150% (Figs. 3B and 4), except for GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta cc (Fig. 3B), GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT, and GABAB(1a)Delta CT + GABAB(2)Delta CT (Fig. 4 and Table 1). The smaller (p < 0.01) conductance increases compared with wild-type may have resulted from reduced surface expression, as shown for GABAB(2)Delta CT when expressed alone (Fig. 2C) or for GABAB(1a) in the combinations mentioned above (Fig. 2D). However, 6 of 25 cells transfected with GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT and two of nine cells transfected with GABAB(1a)Delta CT + GABAB(2)Delta CT showed GIRK-current activation comparable with other deletion mutants [68.1 ± 20% (n = 6) and 49.4% (n = 2)]. This is consistent with the observation that only a small fraction of cells transfected with GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT expresses GABAB(1a) on the cell surface. Thus, GIRK-activation is also possible in the absence of GABAB receptor C termini.

Coupling to Ca2+ Currents. To investigate GABA-ergic inhibition of neuronal calcium channel currents, we microinjected plasmids encoding wild-type and/or mutated GABAB receptor subunits into the nucleus of SCG neurons. In SCG neurons that endogenously express GABAB(1a) and calcium channels, a significant (p < 0.05) baclofen-mediated inhibition of calcium conductance was obtained only when GABAB(2) was injected (Fig. 3C; see also Filippov et al., 2000). An increased (p < 0.05) calcium current inhibition was observed when coinjecting GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2), GABAB(1a)Delta cc + GABAB(2), and GABAB(1a)Delta cc + GABAB(2)Delta cc (Fig. 3C). Similar to the results in GIRK channel coupling in HEK293 cells, injection of GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta cc (Fig. 3C) or GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT (Fig. 4A) resulted in a smaller (p < 0.05) calcium current inhibition in SCG neurons (see Discussion). Thus, the cytoplasmic C-terminal domains of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) do not seem to be involved in the agonist-activated G-protein coupling of GABAB receptors in either HEK293 cells or neurons.

GABAB Receptor Antagonists Increase cAMP Levels in Cotransfected HEK293 Cells

When performing cAMP assays, we observed that antagonists not only block GABA-ergic agonist-mediated cAMP decrease but also increase cAMP levels above those induced with FSK alone (Fig. 4). We therefore looked at the direct effect of the antagonists SCH50911 and CGP54626 on FSK-induced cAMP levels and found that both antagonists increased cAMP accumulation up to 100% (Fig. 5A). The EC50 values of 1.67 ± 0.51 µM for SCH50911 (n = 4) and 6.7 ± 1.1 nM (n = 3) for CGP54626 were greater than their dissociation constants [IC50 = 0.43 ± 0.04 µM for SCH50911 (Kaupmann et al., 1998), KD = 1.3 ± 0.1 nM for CGP54626; data not shown]. Treating transfected HEK293 cells with 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates Gi and Go, for 16 h before assay eliminated both the Gi-mediated inhibition of FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation by GABA or (R)-baclofen (not shown) as well as the increase of FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation by SCH50911 or CGP54626 (Fig. 5C). These antagonists also increased basal cAMP levels up to 60% (not shown). However, basal cAMP levels are near the detection limit of our assay, so dose-response curves were not measured.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inverse agonism of GABAB receptor antagonists. A, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with the indicated constructs and FSK-stimulated cAMP production in the presence of increasing concentrations of the GABAB receptor antagonists SCH50911 (filled symbols) and CGP54626 (open symbols), respectively, was determined as outlined under Materials and Methods. cAMP production in the absence of ligand was set to 100% and is reported as a function of the antagonist concentration. Data points were fitted to the four-parameter logistic function using the program Origin (Microcal Software, Inc., Northampton, MA). The data shown are means of duplicates from one of three independent experiments. Expression levels and fitted parameters for this experiment are as follows: GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2): 900,000 [3H]CGP54626 sites/cell, pEC50(SCH50911) = 5.83 ± 0.09, pEC50(CGP54626) = 8.21 ± 0.03; GABAB(1a)Delta cc + GABAB(2): 730,000 [3H]CGP54626 sites/cell, pEC50(SCH50911) = 6.67 ± 0.22, pEC50 (CGP54626) = 8.63 ± 0.11; GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta cc: 920,000 [3H]CGP54626 sites/cell. B, Western blot analysis of the cotransfected cells measured in A. Cell lysate of 100,000 cells was loaded in each lane: 1, GABAB(1a)Delta cc + GABAB(2) ; 2, GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta cc; 3, GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2). The left three lanes were probed with a GABAB(1) -specific antiserum and the right three lanes with the GABAB(2) C terminus-specific antibody. C, the effect of 100 µM GABA, 1 mM SCH50911 (SCH) and 10 µM CGP54626 (CGP) on 2 µM FSK-stimulated cAMP levels was measured in HEK293 cells coexpressing GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) with () and without (black-square) prior treatment with 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin for 16 h. D, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with the expression plasmids for GABAB(1a) (R1) or GABAB(1a)Delta CT (R1Delta CT) in combination with those for GABAB(2) (R2) andthe indicated deletion mutants. cAMP production was measured in the presence of 2 µM FSK and either 100 µM GABA or 2 mM SCH50911 or 10 µM CGP54626, respectively. FSK-induced cAMP levels were set to 100% (horizontal line). Data in C and D are shown as percentage of FSK-induced cAMP levels under the indicated conditions and represent mean ± S.D. of at least two independent experiments. *, p < 0.05, antagonist effect on FSK-induced cAMP levels; dagger , p < 0.05, difference between GABAB(1a) and equivalent GABAB(1a)Delta CT combinations.

Interestingly, both antagonists had no effect on FSK-induced cAMP levels in HEK293 cells cotransfected with GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2)Delta cc (Fig. 5, A and D). In HEK293 cells expressing GABAB(1a)Delta cc together with GABAB(2), the EC50 values with 216 nM for SCH50911 and 2.4 nM for CGP54626 were near the dissociation constant values of these ligands for the wild-type receptor but the efficacy (maximal increase of FSK-stimulated cAMP accumulation) was about 4-fold lower (Fig. 5A). Protein levels of the various receptor subunits were similar in all three combinations as detected by Western blot (Fig. 5B) and [3H]CGP54626 binding. Because deletion of the coiled-coil region in GABAB(2) abolished this inverse agonist effect, we analyzed various combinations of GABAB(1a) and GABAB(1a)Delta CT with GABAB(2) deletion mutants (Fig. 5D and Table 1). HEK293 cells cotransfected with GABAB(1a) and GABAB(2) deletions that lack the coiled-coil region (i.e., GABAB(2)Delta cc and GABAB(2)Delta CT) did not show an increase in FSK-stimulated cAMP levels, whereas cotransfection with GABAB(2)Delta 820-940, GABAB(2)Delta 748-780, or GABAB(2)Delta CT+cc showed an effect similar to that of the wild-type. If GABAB(1a) was replaced by GABAB(1a)Delta CT in cotransfected HEK293 cells, the efficacy decreased to values similar to those with GABAB(1)Delta cc + GABAB(2) (Fig. 5, A and D). In contrast to GABAB(1a), however, GABAB(1a)Delta CT together with GABAB(2)Delta 748-780 or GABAB(2)Delta CT+cc showed no significant inverse agonism (Fig. 5D and Table 1). In these two mutants, the coiled-coil region is located closer to the end of transmembrane domain 7 than in the wild-type GABAB(2) protein (see Fig. 1) which might affect receptor conformation. Thus, the C termini of both GABAB(1) and GABAB(2), and especially their ability to form a coiled coil, are important for allowing the receptor to adopt an activated conformation without an agonist bound.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Physical Interaction And Trafficking of GABAB Receptor Subunits. Despite recent advances in our understanding of GABAB receptor heteromerization, the exact molecular determinants mediating the interaction between the two subunits are still unknown. Our data indicate that heteromerization and trafficking are strongly based on the coiled-coil interaction between the C termini of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2). At the same time, we found that deletion of the coiled-coil domains in GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) subunits did not completely abolish their physical interaction. Furthermore, GABAB(2) mutants lacking the coiled-coil domain led to significant surface expression of GABAB(1) and to a decreased, but significant amount of functional GABAB receptor heteromers (Fig. 3 and 4, GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta cc and GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT). These data are in accordance with recent reports, which were published as this study was in progress (Calver et al., 2001; Pagano et al., 2001) and suggest that besides the coiled-coil regions, additional interaction sites outside the C termini are responsible for the coassembly of the two GABAB receptor subunits. At least three observations speak in favor of an N-terminal interaction without excluding intramembranous interactions: GABAB(1e), a splice variant encoding an N-terminal fragment of GABAB(1), can compete with full-length GABAB(1) for binding to GABAB(2) (Schwarz et al., 2000); GABAB(2) contributes to high-affinity agonist binding (Jones et al., 1998; Kaupmann et al., 1998); and the extracellular domains of both GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) are involved in the mechanisms of receptor activation (Galvez et al., 2001). Indeed, other C family GPCRs form intermolecular disulfide bridges between their N-terminal extracellular domains and also show noncovalent interactions to support dimerization (Romano et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2001).

Plasma membrane targeting of the GABAB receptor mainly depends on masking the short retention signal RSRR in the C terminus of GABAB(1) (Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000; Pagano et al., 2001; Fig. 2D). A chimeric GABAB(2) subunit in which the entire intracellular tail was replaced with the equivalent domain of GABAB(1) is retained intracellularly (Calver et al., 2001). However, our chimeric GABAB(2) subunit, GABAB(2)_1CT922-960 (Fig. 1), very effectively reaches the cell surface. Thus, GABAB(1) deletion and chimeric constructs in this study revealed that whereas RSRR is certainly the main signal for retention of this subunit in the ER, it depends on the sequence environment to become recognized. A comparison of our results with those of Pagano et al. (2001) suggests that the amino acids directly N-terminal to RSRR, which at the same time form the C-terminal part of the coiled-coil domain (QLQXRQQLRSRR where X = S or D), are involved in its recognition (Fig. 6). The RSRR sequence is assumed to function by binding to an ER protein; it is tempting to speculate that this binding relies on a part of the GABAB(1) coiled-coil sequence as well. Competition between such an ER protein and GABAB(2) might then regulate the release of GABAB(1) from the ER. The GABAB(1) coiled-coil domain can have different binding partners depending on its subcellular localization within neurons; it has recently been found to even mediate binding of a transcription factor (Nehring et al., 2000; White et al., 2000).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The functionality of the retention signal RSRR depends on surrounding sequences. The sequences of the coiled-coil region of wild-type GABAB(1) and mutants are shown. In the chimeric constructs, sequences derived from GABAB(2) are italic. The retention signal reported in Margeta-Mitrovic et al. (2000) is bold. The functional retention sequence deduced from a combination of results described in this study and in constructs characterized by Pagano et al. (2001) is underlined. +, surface expression.

Molecular Determinants for Coupling of GABAB Receptors with Effector Systems. Type C metabotropic receptors, such as the metabotropic glutamate receptors, couple to G-proteins via residues in their second and third intracellular loops (Gomeza et al., 1996). These residues are not conserved at parallel positions in GABAB(1), thereby raising the possibility that other loci within the intracellular loops or in the intracellular C termini of GABAB receptors mediate G-protein coupling. We therefore probed the ability of C-terminal mutants of GABAB(1) and of GABAB(2) to couple with each of their three main effector systems (i.e., adenylyl cyclase, GIRKs, and calcium channels).

An important caveat of functional experiments on receptor mutants done in vitro is their potential failure to effectively reach the cell surface (see GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta cc, GABAB(1a) + GABAB(2)Delta CT and GABAB(1a)Delta CT + GABAB(2)Delta CT). Comparison of effector coupling of GABAB receptor mutants versus their surface expression in our study clearly demonstrated that the C terminus of neither GABAB(1) nor of GABAB(2) is required for effector-coupling provided that the subunit combination reaches the cell surface effectively. These results, which are in perfect accordance with recent reports (Calver et al., 2001; Galvez et al., 2001; Pagano et al., 2001), suggest that the intracellular loops but not the C termini of GABAB subunits mediate G-protein coupling. Indeed, a study that was published during the preparation of this article identified by site-directed mutagenesis the amino acid residues located within the second intracellular loop of GABAB(2) that are critical for coupling of the GABAB heterodimer to downstream effector systems (Robbins et al., 2001). Taken together, these data suggest a model of GABAB heterodimers in which binding of agonists to GABAB(1) results in the activation of signaling cascades via G-protein coupling through GABAB(2).

Constitutive Activity of GABAB Receptors. Our data indicate that CGP54626 and SCH50911, which are well known as GABAB receptor antagonists, are also able to function as inverse agonists, because in GABAB receptor-expressing HEK293 cells, both ligands increase FSK-stimulated cAMP levels up to 2-fold. Being sensitive to treatment with pertussis toxin, this effect depends on a functional G-protein of the Gi/o class. Our observations imply that CGP54626 and SCH50911 shift the GABAB receptor to a conformation that is less accessible to Gialpha , thus allowing higher activation of adenylyl cyclase. These results indicate that the GABAB receptor has the potential for constitutive activity. Galvez et al. (2001) observed a slight increase in the basal level of inositol phosphate formation in HEK293 cells expressing wild-type GABAB receptors. A large increase in the basal inositol phosphate formation was detectable in cells expressing GABAB receptor dimers consisting of GABAB(1a) and a chimeric GABAB(2) subunit, in which the extracellular domain has been replaced by that of GABAB(1a). This large increase in inositol phosphate could be partly inhibited by GABA and this inhibition could be antagonized by CGP64213.

Constitutive activity has been described for numerous GPCRs (Leurs et al., 1998). In most cases, inverse agonism and constitutive activity have been observed in heterologous systems, in which receptors are often expressed at very high densities. In the last few years, constitutive activity has also been shown for some recombinant receptors expressed at physiological concentrations (Smit et al., 1996; Claeysen et al., 1999). Thus, it would be of great interest to determine whether constitutive activity of GABAB receptors exists at physiological levels in stable cell lines or in native tissue. Evidence for the relevance of constitutive activity of GPCRs in vivo is emerging and might enable therapeutic applications for inverse agonists (Morisset et al., 2000).

Interestingly, deletion of the coiled-coil region within the C terminus of GABAB(2) abolished the ability of the two antagonists CGP54626 and SCH50911 to increase FSK-stimulated cAMP levels whereas deletion of the regions upstream or downstream of the coiled-coil stretch had no significant effect on inverse agonism. Deletion of the coiled-coil region within the C terminus of GABAB(1a) decreased the efficacy of CGP54626 and SCH50911 to function as inverse agonists but did not abolish inverse agonism. Our data on coupling to adenylyl cyclase can be interpreted in the framework of the simple, two-state model of GPCR activation, where the receptor can isomerize from an inactive conformation (R), which is not able to activate G-proteins, to an active form (R*) in the absence of an agonist (Lefkowitz et al., 1993). Our data indicate that the active conformation is stabilized by the coiled-coil interaction. If the coiled-coil cannot be formed because of its deletion in GABAB(2), then the GABAB heteromer cannot adopt an active conformation without an agonist bound. Deletion of the coiled coil in GABAB(1) or of its whole cytoplasmic C-terminal part still allows constitutive activity as long as the coiled-coil region in GABAB(2) is neither deleted nor displaced. However, the equilibrium is shifted toward the inactive form, thus reducing the efficacy. Thus, as opposed to agonist-mediated G-protein coupling, both C termini are involved in efficiently mediating the inverse agonist effect of the ligands CGP54626 and SCH50911. In different GPCR families, different receptor domains are of importance for constraining the receptor in inactive and active conformations. There are increasing data to indicate that specific sequences of the C-terminal end of GPCRs, including metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (Mary et al., 1998), histamine (Morisset et al., 2000), or serotonin receptors (Claeysen et al., 1999), modulate the isomerization of these receptors from R to R*. In contrast to the GABAB receptor, however, the role of the C termini of the above receptors is to maintain the receptor in an inactive conformation in the absence of an agonist.

Conclusions. Interaction of the two subunits of the GABAB receptor occurs not only through the coiled-coil domains but also through low affinity interaction sites, probably located within N-terminal extracellular domains and/or membrane spanning regions. Whereas the C termini of the two subunits are not necessary for functional heterodimerization, their coiled-coil domains are involved in stabilizing the active conformation of the heterodimer. Furthermore, efficient trafficking of GABAB(1) to the cell surface requires interaction via the coiled-coil domain. Notably, the retention signal of GABAB(1) requires a part of its coiled-coil sequence.

    Acknowledgments

We thank G. Eichberger, G. Eisenhardt, F. Herzog, A. Hesselschwerdt, and K. Hirschfeld for excellent technical assistance.

    Footnotes

Received November 9, 2001; Accepted January 25, 2002

1 Current address: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

2 Current address: Department of Molecular Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

3 Current address: Department of Physiology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

4 Current address: Center for Molecular Neurobiology (ZMNH), University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

This work was supported by Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie grant 0311633.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Sylvia Grünewald, Axaron Bioscience AG, Im Neuenheimer Feld 515, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: gruenewald{at}axaron.com

    Abbreviations

GABA, gamma -aminobutyric acid; GPCR, G-protein coupled receptor; HEK, human embryonic kidney; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; bp, base pair(s); PCR, polymerase chain reaction; cc, coiled-coil domain; NGS, normal goat serum; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; FSK, forskolin; GIRK, G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channel; SCG, superior cervical ganglion; SCH50911, (+)-(2S)-5,5-dimethyl-2-morpholineacetic acid; CGP54626, [S-(R*,R*)]-[3-[[1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino]-2-hydroxypropyl](cyclohexylmethyl) phosphinic acid; BAPTA, 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0026-895X/02/6105-1070-1080$3.00
Mol Pharmacol, 61:1070-1080, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Pooler and R. A. J. McIlhinney
Lateral Diffusion of the GABAB Receptor Is Regulated by the GABAB2 C Terminus
J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25349 - 25356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. S. Mukherjee, E. W. McBride, M. Beinborn, K. Dunlap, and A. S. Kopin
Point Mutations in Either Subunit of the GABAB Receptor Confer Constitutive Activity to the Heterodimer
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1406 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
M. W. Fleck
Glutamate Receptors and Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control: Looking beneath the Surface
Neuroscientist, June 1, 2006; 12(3): 232 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
X. Dai and J. J. Galligan
Differential Trafficking and Desensitization of Human ETA and ETB Receptors Expressed in HEK 293 Cells.
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 746 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Gassmann, C. Haller, Y. Stoll, S. A. Aziz, B. Biermann, J. Mosbacher, K. Kaupmann, and B. Bettler
The RXR-Type Endoplasmic Reticulum-Retention/Retrieval Signal of GABAB1 Requires Distant Spacing from the Membrane to Function
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 137 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. J. Mah, E. Cornell, N. A. Mitchell, and M. W. Fleck
Glutamate Receptor Trafficking: Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control Involves Ligand Binding and Receptor Function
J. Neurosci., March 2, 2005; 25(9): 2215 - 2225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Kanki, S. Kupershmidt, T. Yang, S. Wells, and D. M. Roden
A Structural Requirement for Processing the Cardiac K+ Channel KCNQ1
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33976 - 33983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Binet, C. Brajon, L. Le Corre, F. Acher, J.-P. Pin, and L. Prezeau
The Heptahelical Domain of GABAB2 Is Activated Directly by CGP7930, a Positive Allosteric Modulator of the GABAB Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29085 - 29091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. Bettler, K. Kaupmann, J. Mosbacher, and M. Gassmann
Molecular Structure and Physiological Functions of GABAB Receptors
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 835 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. A. Syme, K. L. Hamilton, H. M. Jones, A. C. Gerlach, L. Giltinan, G. D. Papworth, S. C. Watkins, N. A. Bradbury, and D. C. Devor
Trafficking of the Ca2+-activated K+ Channel, hIK1, Is Dependent upon a C-terminal Leucine Zipper
J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8476 - 8486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grünewald, S.
Right arrow Articles by Köhr, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grünewald, S.
Right arrow Articles by Köhr, G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics