![]() |
|
|
Vol. 62, Issue 1, 81-89, July 2002
Molecular Recognition Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Z.-G.G., S.G.K., K.A.S., N.M., K.A.J.); Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands (A.P.I.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have identified a series of 1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolines as selective allosteric enhancers of human A3 adenosine receptors. Several of these compounds potentiated both the potency and maximal efficacy of agonist-induced responses and selectively decreased the dissociation of the agonist N6-(4-amino-3-[125I]iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine from human A3 adenosine receptors. There was no effect on the dissociation of the antagonist [3H]8-ethyl-4-methyl-2-phenyl-(8R)-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[2.1-i]purin-5-one (PSB-11) from the A3 receptors, as well as [3H]N6-[(R)-phenylisopropyl]adenosine from rat brain A1 receptors and [3H]2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl-ethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine from rat striatal A2A receptors, suggesting the selective enhancement of agonist binding at A3 receptors. The analogs were tested as antagonists of competitive binding at human A3 receptors, and Ki values ranging from 120 nM to 101 µM were observed; as for many allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors, an orthosteric effect was also present. The most promising leads from the present set of analogs seem to be the 2-cyclopentyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline derivatives, of which the 4-phenylamino analog DU124183 had the most favorable degree of allosteric modulation versus receptor antagonism. The inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in intact cells that express human A3 receptors was employed as a functional index of A3 receptor activation. The enhancer DU124183 caused a marked leftward shift of the concentration-response curve of the A3 receptor agonists in the presence of antagonist and, surprisingly, a potentiation of the maximum agonist efficacy by approximately 30%. Thus, we have identified a novel structural lead for developing allosteric enhancers of A3 adenosine receptors; such enhancers may be useful for treating brain ischemia and other hypoxic conditions.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In
addition to the orthosteric ligand binding site for competitive
antagonists and agonists, the A3 adenosine
receptor contains an allosteric binding site (Gao et al., 2001
). An
allosteric ligand and a competitive ligand can bind to a given receptor
simultaneously and modulate the affinity of the other. In the case of
the ion channel-coupled GABAA receptor, diazepam
enhances the endogenous neurotransmitter GABA via an allosteric site
(Macdonald and Olsen, 1994
), thus providing therapeutic efficacy,
whereas the direct-acting agonists are not used clinically because of
the side effects. In the ion channel-coupled nicotinic receptors,
galanthamine, which is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor as well as an
allosteric modulator at nicotinic receptor sites potentiating nicotinic
cholinergic neurotransmission, has recently been extensively and
successfully used in clinical trials and also showed satisfactory
therapeutic effects in Alzheimer's disease (Olin and Schneider, 2001
).
Thus, the presence of the allosteric site provided a new target for drug discovery.
Although no allosteric modulator for a G protein-coupled receptor has
been used clinically so far, several lines of evidence suggested that
allosteric modulators might have advantages over classical ligands from
the therapeutic point of view (Birdsall et al., 1995
; Linden, 1997
;
Kobilka, 2000
; Pin et al., 2001
). The therapeutic effects of agonists
may be limited by receptor desensitization. Allosteric modulators, by
potentiating the effects of the endogenous agonists, may be more
selective compared with the classical agonists (Birdsall et al., 1995
;
Bhattacharya and Linden, 1996
; Linden, 1997
). The allosteric site may
not have been conserved during evolution as strictly as the orthosteric ligand binding site. Currently available muscarinic drugs show only
modest subtype selectivity, probably because of the strict conservation
of sequence in regions considered to bind agonists (Hulme et al.,
1990
). Even if the allosteric sites of different receptor subtypes are
very similar, only a small intersubtype difference in protein sequence
might alter the characteristic cooperativity at one subtype over
another subtype. For example, the design of subtype-selective agonists
or antagonists for any single subtype of G protein-coupled muscarinic
receptors has proven elusive. However, by targeting the allosteric site
on muscarinic receptors, compounds with much greater subtype
selectivity have been identified (Birdsall et al., 1999
). One such
allosteric modulator is the alkaloid brucine, which is capable of
selectively enhancing the effects of acetylcholine at only m1
receptors, whereas N-chloromethylbrucine enhances
acetylcholine actions at only m3 receptors. Brucine N-oxide enhances acetylcholine binding at both m3 and m4 receptors. By targeting the allosteric site, the first subtype-selective non-amino acid-like antagonists for mGlu5 receptors have
also been recently identified (Spooren et al., 2001
).
We have recently reported that a series of 3-(2-pyridinyl)isoquinoline
derivatives allosterically enhanced agonist binding at
A3 adenosine receptors (Gao et al., 2001
). In the
course of screening potential allosteric modulators for
A3 receptors, we found that a series of
1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolines (Fig.
1), including DU124183, enhanced both
agonist binding and function at A3 receptors.
Herein we describe the characteristics of allosteric modulation of
A3 adenosine receptors by these compounds
employing both dissociation kinetics and a cyclic AMP functional assay
in intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human
A3 adenosine receptors.
|
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. CPA, CGS15943, NECA, Cl-IB-MECA, and MRS1220 were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). [125I]I-AB-MECA; 2000 Ci/mmol), [3H]PSB-11 (53 Ci/mmol), [3H](R)-PIA (34 Ci/mmol), [3H]DPCPX (120 Ci/mmol), and [3H]CGS21680 (47 Ci/mmol) were from Amersham Bioscience (Buckinghamshire, UK). [3H]ZM241385 was from Tocris (Ballwin, MO). 1H-Imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolines were from the Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research (Leiden, The Netherlands).
Cell Culture and Membrane Preparation.
CHO cells expressing
recombinant human A3 adenosine receptors were
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin,
2 mM glutamine, and 800 µg/ml geneticin. Cells were harvested
by trypsinization. After homogenization and suspension, cells were
centrifuged at 500g for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mg/ml CHAPS. The
suspension was homogenized with an electric homogenizer for 10 s,
and was then recentrifuged at 16,000g for 20 min at 4°C.
The resultant pellets were resuspended in buffer in the presence of 3 units/ml adenosine deaminase, and the suspension was stored at
80°C
until the binding experiments. Striatal and forebrain tissues from
Wistar rats were homogenized in ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, using an electric homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at
20,000g for 10 min at 4°C, and the pellet was washed in
fresh buffer. The final pellet was stored at
80°C until the binding
experiments. The protein concentration was measured using the assay of
Bradford (1976)
.
Dissociation Kinetics of [125I]I-AB-MECA and [3H]PSB-11 from A3 Adenosine Receptors. The dissociation of [125I]I-AB-MECA was measured as follows. Membranes (20 µg) were preincubated at 25°C with 1.0 nM [125I]I-AB-MECA, in a total volume of 100 µl of Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.0) containing 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EDTA for 60 min. The dissociation was then initiated by the addition of 3 µM Cl-IB-MECA with or without allosteric modulators. The time course of dissociation of total binding was measured by rapid filtration at appropriate time intervals. Nonspecific binding was measured after 60-min incubation in the presence of 3 µM Cl-IB-MECA. Binding reactions were terminated by filtration through Whatman GF/B glass-fiber filters under reduced pressure using a MT-24 cell harvester (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD), and radioactivity was determined using a gamma-counter (5500B; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).
For competitive binding experiments, each tube contained 50 µl of membrane suspension, 25 µl of [125I]I-AB-MECA (final concentration 1.0 nM), and 25 µl of increasing concentrations of test compounds in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.0). For the dissociation of antagonist [i.e., [3H]PSB-11 (Müller et al., 2002Dissociation of [3H](R)-PIA and [3H]DPCPX from A1 Adenosine Receptors. Binding of 1 nM [3H](R)-PIA to A1 adenosine receptors in rat forebrain membranes (80 µg/tube) was carried out at 37°C for 90 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.7, containing 10 mM MgCl2 in a total assay volume of 400 µl. Binding of [3H]DPCPX to A1 adenosine receptors in rat forebrain membranes (60 µg/tube) was carried out at 25°C for 60 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, in a total assay volume of 400 µl. The dissociation was begun by addition of 10 µM CPA with or without tested compounds. Nonspecific binding was determined using 10 µM CPA. Samples were filtered after incubation at the time points indicated.
Dissociation of [3H]CGS21680 and [3H]ZM241385 from A2A Adenosine Receptors. Rat striatal membranes (80 µg/tube) were incubated with 15 nM [3H]CGS21680 at 25°C for 90 min in 400 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, containing 10 mM MgCl2. Dissociation was started by the addition of 10 µM NECA in the presence and absence of tested compounds. For the dissociation of [3H]ZM241385, the procedures were similar to that of [3H]CGS21680.
Cyclic AMP Accumulation Assay.
Cyclic AMP levels were
measured with a competitive protein binding method (Nordstedt and
Fredholm, 1990
; Post et al., 2000
). CHO cells that expressed
recombinant human A3 adenosine receptors were
harvested by trypsinization. After centrifugation and resuspension in
medium, cells were deposited in 24-well plates in volumes of 1 ml.
After 24 h, the medium was removed and cells were washed three
times with 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Cells were then treated with agonists and/or test
compounds in the presence of rolipram (10 µM) and adenosine deaminase
(3 units/ml). After 45 min, forskolin (10 µM) was added to the medium
and the incubation was continued for an additional 15 min. The reaction
was terminated by removal of the supernatant, and cells were lysed upon
the addition of 200 µl of ice-cold 0.1 M HCl. The cell lysate was
resuspended and stored at
20°C. For determination of cyclic AMP
production, protein kinase A was incubated with
[3H]cyclic AMP (2 nM) in
K2HPO4/EDTA buffer
(K2HPO4, 150 mM; EDTA, 10 mM), 20 µl of the cell lysate, and 30 µl of 0.1 M HCl or 50 µl of
cyclic AMP solution (0-80 nM for standard curve). Bound radioactivity
was separated by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/C filters and
washed once with cold buffer. Bound radioactivity was measured by
liquid scintillation counter.
Statistical Analysis.
Results from cyclic AMP assay and
binding parameters were analyzed by Prism software (GraphPad, San
Diego, CA). IC50 values obtained from competition
curves were converted to Ki values by using the Cheng and Prusoff equation (1973)
. Data were expressed as
mean ± S.E.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Time Course of Agonist [125I]I-AB-MECA and Antagonist
[3H]PSB-11 Dissociation from A3 Receptors in
the Absence and Presence of Potential Allosteric Modulators.
The
dissociation of [125I]I-AB-MECA from human
A3 receptors was measured in the absence and
presence of test compounds (Fig. 1, Table
1). DU124183 significantly decreased the
dissociation rate, whereas the isomeric compound DU124482 influenced
the rate of dissociation only slightly (Fig.
2). The dissociation rates in the absence
and presence of 10 µM DU124183 were 0.056 ± 0.008 and
0.030 ± 0.006 min
1, respectively, which
were significantly different (p < 0.05). By
comparison, the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist CGS15943 (30 µM) and the A1 receptor enhancer of agonist
action, PD81723 (30 µM) did not affect the dissociation rate at
A3 receptors (Table 1). The dissociation rates in the
absence and presence of the imidazoquinoline derivatives and the
residual radioligand binding remaining after 45 min of dissociation are
summarized in Table 1. For the most potent allosteric modulators, the
percentage of residual [125I]I-AB-MECA binding
after dissociation of 45 min was roughly twice the percentage in the
absence of test compounds.
|
|
1) in the presence of DU124183 and DU124482
were 0.33 ± 0.05 and 0.33 ± 0.07 min
1, respectively, which were not
significantly different from the k
1 value
(k
1 = 0.31 ± 0.04 min
1) in the absence of allosteric modulators
(P > 0.05).
|
Concentration-Dependent Effect of DU124183 on Agonist Radioligand
[125I]I-AB-MECA from the A3 Receptor.
To
further demonstrate the allosteric effects of DU124183, we observed the
concentration-dependent effects of these compounds on the dissociation
of [125I]I-AB-MECA from the human
A3 receptor. Figure
4 shows the influence of increasing
concentrations of DU124183 on the dissociation of [125I]I-AB-MECA in the presence of 3 µM
Cl-IB-MECA. Dissociation was allowed to proceed for 45 min before the
reaction was terminated by filtration. DU124183 decreased the
dissociation rate in a concentration-dependent manner.
|
Dissociation of [3H]R.-PIA and
[3H]DPCPX from A1 Adenosine Receptors.
In contrast to the enhancement of A3 receptor
agonist binding, DU124183 and DU124482 did not enhance the binding of
A1 receptor agonist (Fig.
5a). The dissociation rates in the
absence (0.14 ± 0.02 min
1) and in the
presence of 10 µM DU124183 and DU124482 (0.14 ± 0.03 and
0.15 ± 0.02 min
1, respectively) were not
significantly different (p > 0.05). Similar to its
effects on agonist dissociation, DU124183 did not influence the
dissociation of [3H]DPCPX from
A1 adenosine receptors (Fig. 5b). This contrasts with the effect of amiloride, which increased the dissociation rate of
[3H]DPCPX from A1
adenosine receptors (Fig. 5b).
|
Dissociation of [3H]CGS21680 and
[3H]ZM241385 from Rat A2A Adenosine
Receptors.
Similar to their effects on A1
receptors, DU124183 and DU124482 did not enhance the dissociation rate
of [3H]CGS21680 from A2A
receptors (Fig. 6a). The dissociation
rates in the absence and presence of DU124183 (30 µM) and DU124482
were 0.029 ± 0.04, and 0.032 ± 0.05 min
1 and 0.029 ± 0.05 min
1 which were not significantly different
(p > 0.05). The dissociation of the antagonist
[3H]ZM241385 from rat A2A
adenosine receptors was also not significantly affected (Fig. 6b).
|
Competitive Binding of 1H-Imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolines at A3 Receptors. Besides their allosteric effect, the 1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinoline derivatives were also found to be competitive binding antagonists at A3 receptors. The effect of one of the 1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolines, DU124183, on the equilibrium binding of [125I]I-AB-MECA binding was shown in Fig. 4b. The Ki values of various compounds versus [125I]I-AB-MECA binding are listed in Table 1.
The effects on affinity, as orthosteric antagonist, at human A3 receptors also depended on the substitution patterns at the 2-, 3-, and 4- positions of the imidazoquinoline derivatives. The structure activity relationships seemed to be different from those for allosteric modulation. The most potent derivatives in competitive binding experiments were the 2-phenyl-4-phenyloxy derivative DU124480 (Ki, 120 nM) and the relatively simple 4-chloro derivative DU124276 (Ki, 160 nM). Among the most potent derivatives for allosteric modulation, the 2-cyclopentyl-4-phenylamino derivative DU124183 was only of intermediate affinity in the competitive binding assay. Two other derivatives, DU124182 and DU124184, which had large enhancing effects, were more potent than DU124183 in orthosteric binding. Addition of a 3-methyl group in DU124585 reduced binding affinity of the parent phenoxy derivative, DU124182, by 120-fold. Addition of a N-cyclopentyl group to a 4-amino substituent had no effect on orthosteric affinity in the case of the pair of 2-phenyl derivatives, DU124482 and DU124483, although it reduced affinity by 18-fold in the case of the pair of 2-cyclopentyl derivatives, DU124184 and DU124185. Thus, for A3 receptor competitive binding affinity, the effects of substitution at the 2- and 4-positions were also interdependent.Functional Assay.
The dissociation kinetics can provide the
clearest indication of allosteric modulation; however, the potential
therapeutic effect of an allosteric agent is determined by its effect
on the functional activity of agonists, including the endogenous
ligand. The inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in CHO cells that express human A3 receptors was
employed as a functional index of A3 receptor
activation. To further evaluate the pharmacological effects of the
1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinoline derivatives, we observed the
effects of these compounds on the potency and efficacy of Cl-IB-MECA, a
potent and selective A3 agonist containing
ribose, and MRS1898, a newly synthesized potent and selective
A3 agonist containing a rigid
(N)-methanocarba ring in place of the ribose moiety (Lee et
al., 2001
).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we demonstrated for the first time that the imidazoquinoline derivative DU124183 selectively decreased the dissociation rate of the agonist radioligand from human A3 adenosine receptors. Furthermore, and surprisingly, this derivative increased the maximum efficacy as well as the potency of A3 agonists in a cyclic AMP functional assay in intact CHO cells expressing human A3 receptors. This compound modified the intrinsic efficacy of the orthosteric ligands without having any intrinsic efficacy of its own; thus, we have identified a novel structural lead for developing allosteric enhancers of A3 adenosine receptors.
With this set of analogs, it was possible to discern structure activity relationship patterns for the allosteric modulation of A3 agonist effects. Additional analogs would need to be synthesized and tested to verify these tentative conclusions. Substitution at the 2- and 4-positions, however, was possible; in some cases, this resulted in enhancement of allosteric modulation. Both amino and aryl ether substituents were tolerated at the 4-position. A 4-phenylamino group was roughly equivalent to a 4-phenylether group in its positive effect on allosteric modulation. The effects of substitution at the 2- and 4-positions were interdependent. In the case of 4-cyclopentylamino substitution, the substituent at the 2-position may be various bulky groups. In the case of 4-phenylamino- or 4-phenyloxy-substition, the substituent at the 2-position may be cyclopentyl but not phenyl. A 3-methyl group precluded allosteric modulation by the imidazoquinoline derivative DU124182.
The most promising leads from the present set of analogs seem to be the 2-cyclopentyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline derivatives DU124182, DU124183, and DU124184. Of these analogs, DU124183 had the most favorable degree of allosteric modulation versus receptor antagonism. The compound DU124482, structurally close to DU124183, influenced the agonist dissociation rate only slightly. Furthermore, in contrast to DU124183, DU124482 decreased the maximum efficacy of agonists in the cyclic AMP functional assay without affecting agonist potency, suggesting the chemical specificity of these effects. It is interesting that the reversal of positions of the phenyl group and cyclopentyl groups resulted in an almost completely different modulatory activity.
These imidazoquinoline derivatives were first reported as antagonists
of A1 and A2A receptors
(van Galen et al., 1991
). The imidazoquinoline analogs were tested in
competitive binding assays at human A3 receptors,
and Ki values ranging from 120 nM to
101 µM were observed; as for many allosteric modulators of GPCRs, an
orthosteric competitive effect was also present. One of the compounds,
DU124482, was suggested to be a selective A1
receptor antagonist (van Galen et al., 1991
); the present study further confirmed this selectivity by virtue of weak affinity at
A3 receptors.
Allosteric modulation of adenosine receptors has been demonstrated in
A1, A2A, and
A3 adenosine receptors (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
;
Gao and IJzerman, 2000
; Gao et al., 2001
). Positive allosteric modulators at G protein-coupled receptors have been identified in both
A1 and A3 adenosine
receptors (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
; Gao et al., 2001
). However, those
modulators increased the agonist potency only in binding and functional
assays without affecting the maximal response. For example, the
allosteric enhancer PD81723 increased the potency of the
A1 receptor agonist CPA without influencing its
maximum effect (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
). Similarly, the isoquinoline derivative VUF5455 increased the potency of A3
agonists but did not affect the maximum efficacy (Gao et al., 2001
).
These effects can be described a ternary allosteric model in which
both the orthosteric and allosteric ligands bind to the
receptor simultaneously and modulate reciprocally. In the case of
DU124183 and DU124482, it might be more complex. Recently, Hall (2000)
described an extension of the two-state model of receptor activation to
account for the allosteric modulators affecting the agonist affinity as
well as the intrinsic efficacy of agonists. In that model, it was
suggested that the most suitable assay system may be one with very low
receptor expression in which even highly efficacious agonists are
unable to fully activate the signal transduction cascade (Hall, 2000
). Fortuitously, in our cyclic AMP functional assay system, none of the
A3 agonists tested inhibited forskolin-stimulated
cyclic AMP accumulation by more than approximately 50 to 60%. This
less-than-complete inhibition made the cyclic AMP assay an ideal model
for the characterization of the functional aspects of the allosteric
modulators, especially the characterization of the maximum effect in
the presence of allosteric modulators.
Similar to the present results demonstrated in the
A3 adenosine receptor, it has recently been
reported that two chemical series of compounds, including Ro 01-6128, act as positive allosteric modulators for mGlu1 receptors (Knoflach et
al., 2001
), and
2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-(3-hydroxy-2',2'-dimethyl-propyl)phenol (CGP7930) (Urwyler et al., 2001
) as allosteric modulators for GABAB receptors. These allosteric modulators also
increased both the affinity and the maximum efficacy. However, Litschig
et al. (1999)
reported that an allosteric modulator for the mGlu1
receptor, 7-hydroxyiminocyclopropan[b]chromen-1a-carboxylic acid
ethyl ester, decreased the efficacy of glutamate in stimulating
phosphoinositide hydrolysis without affecting its potency.
The present results show that there were distinct structural requirements for allosteric enhancement of A3 adenosine receptor binding, and these requirements were different from those for competitive A3 antagonistic activity. For example, DU124183 was 3-fold less potent than DU124482 but it was more potent than DU124482 in its allosteric enhancing effect. It seems that the structure-activity relationships for allosteric enhancement are separable from those for competitive antagonism, suggesting that it may be possible to discover compounds with improved enhancing activity that lack antagonist activity. Nevertheless, in the present study, in a functional assay, the efficacy-enhancing effects of DU124183 were evident at high concentrations of agonist and even in the absence of the antagonist MRS1220.
In summary, we identified a new chemical series of compounds as allosteric enhancers for A3 adenosine receptors. The 2-cyclopentyl-4-phenylamino analog DU124183 potentiated both the potency and maximal efficacy of an agonist-induced response. Allosteric enhancers of A3 adenosine receptors may be useful for treating ischemia and other conditions involving local energy deficits, and the unusual dual effects on adenosine receptor activation might open a new route in development of drugs for the ischemic diseases.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. Gary Stiles (Duke University, Durham, NC) for the gift of CHO cells expressing human A3 receptors and Dr. Christa Müller (Pharmaceutical Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany) for providing [3H]PSB-11.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 4, 2001; Accepted March 19, 2002
Gilead Sciences provided financial support for Z.-G.G.
Address correspondence to: Dr. K. A. Jacobson, Molecular Recognition Section, Bldg. 8A, Rm. B1A-19, NIH, NIDDK, LBC, Bethesda, MD 20892-0810. E-mail: kajacobs{at}helix.nih.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
DU124183, 2-cyclopentyl-4-phenylamino-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
CPA, N6-cyclopentyladenosine;
CGS15943, 5-amino-9-chloro-2-(2-furyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline;
NECA, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine;
Cl-IB-MECA, 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarbamoyladenosine;
MRS1220, N-[9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-yl]benzeneacetamide;
I-AB-MECA, N6-(4-amino-3-iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine;
PSB-11, 8-ethyl-4-methyl2-phenyl-(8R)-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro- 1H-imidazo[2.1-i]purin-5-one;
(R)-PIA, N6-[(R)-phenylisopropyl]adenosine;
DPCPX, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine;
CGS21680, 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl-ethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine;
ZM241385, (4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)(triazolo{2,3-a}-[1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol);
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate;
DU124482, 4-cyclopentylamino-2-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
DU124480, 2-phenyl-4-phenyloxy-1H-imidazol[4,5-c]quinoline;
DU124276, 4-chloro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
DU124182, 2-cyclopentyl-4-phenyloxy-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
DU124184, 2-cyclopentyl-4-cyclopentylamino-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
DU124483, 4-amino-2-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
DU124185, 4-amino-2-cyclopentyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline;
MRS1898, (1'R,2'R,3'S,4'R,5'S)-4-{2-chloro-6-[(3-iodophenylmethyl)amino]purin-9-yl}-1-(methylaminocarbonyl)bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,3-diol;
VUF5455, 4-methoxy-N-[7-methyl-3-(2-pyridinyl)-1-isoquinolinyl]benzamide;
CADO, 2-chloroadenosine;
PD81723, 2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-aminobutyric acidB receptors open new routes for the development of drugs targeting family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors.
Mol Pharmacol
60:
881-884
-aminobutyric acidB receptors by 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-(3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-propyl)-phenol (CGP7930) and its aldehyde analog CGP13501.
Mol Pharmacol
60:
963-971This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Mathiesen, T. Ulven, L. Martini, L. O. Gerlach, A. Heinemann, and E. Kostenis Identification of Indole Derivatives Exclusively Interfering with a G Protein-Independent Signaling Pathway of the Prostaglandin D2 Receptor CRTH2 Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2005; 68(2): 393 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Urwyler, M. F. Pozza, K. Lingenhoehl, J. Mosbacher, C. Lampert, W. Froestl, M. Koller, and K. Kaupmann N,N'-Dicyclopentyl-2-methylsulfanyl-5-nitro-pyrimidine-4,6-diamine (GS39783) and Structurally Related Compounds: Novel Allosteric Enhancers of {gamma}-Aminobutyric AcidB Receptor Function J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2003; 307(1): 322 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-G. Gao, S.-K. Kim, A. S. Gross, A. Chen, J. B. Blaustein, and K. A. Jacobson Identification of Essential Residues Involved in the Allosteric Modulation of the Human A3 Adenosine Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2003; 63(5): 1021 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||