|
|
|
|
Vol. 62, Issue 3, 660-671, September 2002
Departments of Cancer Biology (L.M.B., K.L.C., J.L., Y.X.) and Gynecology and Obstetrics (Y.X.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and Department of Chemistry, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio (L.M.B., Y.X.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The signaling pathways that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) use to activate Akt in ovarian cancer cells are investigated here. We show for the first time, with the use of both pharmacological and genetic inhibitors, that the kinase activity and S473 phosphorylation of Akt induced by LPA and S1P requires both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase (MEK) and p38 MAP kinase, and MEK is likely to be upstream of p38, in HEY ovarian cancer cells. The requirement for both MEK and p38 is cell type- and stimulus-specific. Among 12 cell lines that we tested, 11 respond to LPA and S1P and all of the responsive cell lines require p38 but only nine of them require MEK. Among different stimuli tested, platelet-derived growth factor stimulates S473 phosphorylation of Akt in a MEK- and p38-dependent manner. However, epidermal growth factor, thrombin, and endothelin-1-stimulated Akt S473 phosphorylation require p38 but not MEK. Insulin, on the other hand, stimulates Akt S473 phosphorylation independent of both MEK and p38 in HEY cells. T308 phosphorylation stimulated by LPA/S1P requires MEK but not p38 activation. MEK and p38 activation were sufficient for Akt S473 but not T308 phosphorylation in HEY cells. In contrast to S1P and PDGF, LPA requires Rho for Akt S473 phosphorylation, and Rho is upstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K). LPA/S1P-induced Akt activation may be involved in cell survival, because LPA and S1P treatment in HEY ovarian cancer cells results in a decrease in paclitaxel-induced caspase-3 activity in a PI3-K/MEK/p38-dependent manner.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LPA
and S1P are bioactive lysolipids that exert many of their effects and
signaling activities through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)
(Goetzl and An, 1998
; Moolenaar, 1999
; Spiegel, 1999
). We have reported
previously that both LPA and S1P are important signaling molecules in
ovarian cancer, regulating both growth and metastatic potentials of
ovarian cancer cells (Xu et al., 1995a
,b
, 1998
, 2001
; Hong et al.,
1999
; Schwartz et al., 2001
). We have detected both of these lysolipids
in ascitic fluids in patients with ovarian cancer (Xiao et al., 2000
,
2001
). Moreover, we have reported that LPA is elevated in the plasma of
patients with ovarian cancer but not in that of patients with breast
cancer or leukemia, indicating its potential as a marker for ovarian cancer (Xu et al., 1998
). LPA has been reported to have a
cytoprotective effect in HEY ovarian cancer cells exposed to
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (Frankel and Mills, 1996
).
Furthermore, under certain conditions in vitro, ovarian cancer cells
produce LPA (Shen et al., 1998
; Eder et al., 2000
), suggesting that
LPA, and potentially S1P, function as autocrine growth factors in
ovarian cancer.
LPA and/or S1P have been shown to activate extracellular signal
regulated kinase (ERK) and PI3-K and/or Akt (PKB) via a PTX-sensitive pathway in a number of cell types (Marte and Downward, 1997
; Weiner and
Chun, 1999
; Fang et al., 2000
; Lee et al., 2000
; Xu et al., 2001
). A
Gi-dependent ERK activation is essential for the
mitogenic activity of LPA in fibroblasts (Van Corven et al., 1993
; Fang et al., 2000
). PI3-K/Akt signaling is involved in cell survival in many
cellular systems and cancers (Marte and Downward, 1997
; Liu et al,
1998
; Yuan et al., 2000
). The activation of Akt, an antiapoptotic
protooncogene, is mediated by PI3-K, after receptor stimulation. PI3-K
has also been shown to be the upstream activator of ERK and p38 MAPK
(Krump et al., 1997
; Lopez-Ilasaca et al., 1997
). However, the
potential interactions between ERK/p38 and Akt activation have just
begun to be revealed.
Two different kinases, PDK1 and PDK2, are responsible for the
phosphorylation and activation of Akt at T308 and S473, respectively. PDK1 has been cloned and sequenced (Alessi et al., 1997
). The mechanism
by which S473 undergoes phosphorylation remains obscure. It has been
proposed that S473 can be both autophosphorylated and phosphorylated by
other kinases, such as PDK1 and integrin-linked kinase-1 (ILK1), which
may be promoted by interactions between PDK1 and other kinases
associated with Akt (reviewed in Chan and Tsichlis, 2001
). In vitro
phosphorylation of Akt at S473 by MAPK activated protein kinase-2
(MK2), a downstream target of p38, has been reported previously,
although it is not involved in the in vivo S473 phosphorylation induced
by insulin (Alessi et al., 1996
). Recently, Rane et al. (2001)
have
shown that in neutrophils, p38, but not ERK, activation is required for
Akt S473 phosphorylation induced by fMLP, Fc-
R cross-linking, or
phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3),
and MK2 functions as PDK2 to phosphorylate Akt at S473 in vivo (Rane et
al., 2001
). Apparently, more than one molecular identity may function
as PDK2 to phosphorylate Akt at S473, and this may be cell type- or
stimulus-dependent.
We describe herein a series of studies examining the signaling mechanisms of LPA- and S1P-induced activation of the PI3-K/Akt pathway in HEY ovarian cancer cells and a panel of other cell lines. In this study, we have focused on the signaling mechanisms of LPA/S1P-induced S473 phosphorylation of Akt in HEY cells, which is essential for the full activation of Akt. We demonstrate here that p38 activation is required for most stimuli (LPA, S1P, PDGF, EGF, thrombin, and Et-1, but not insulin) to induce S473 phosphorylation of Akt in HEY cells. In addition, p38 is required for LPA/S1P-induced S473 phosphorylation of Akt in all 11 responsive cell lines tested. On the other hand, of the stimuli tested, MEK is required for Akt S473 phosphorylation induced only by LPA, S1P, and PDGF, and also occurs in a cell line-specific manner. MEK-dependent Akt phosphorylation occurs in all six ovarian cancer cell lines tested, as well as HeLa cells, and T-47D and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, but not in PC-3 prostate cancer or GI-101A breast cancer cells. Moreover, Akt is phosphorylated in a Rho-dependent manner by LPA but not S1P or PDGF, and Rho acts upstream of PI3-K. Our results show that LPA and S1P decrease paclitaxel-induced caspase-3 activity in HEY cells, which is mediated by the PI3-K/MEK/p38 pathway, suggesting that LPA/S1P-induced Akt activation is potentially involved in survival activities of these cells. Because LPA and S1P probably activate Akt through their Edg receptors, the expression patterns of these receptors in all cell lines used in this study have been examined.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Oleoyl-LPA and S1P were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL) or Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, ON, Canada). LPA was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and S1P was dissolved in Tris-saline (50 mM Tris, pH 9.5, 145 mM NaCl) to 4 and 2 mM stock solutions, respectively. LY294002, PD98059, and SB203580 were obtained from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Wortmannin and paclitaxel were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). PTX was purchased from Invitrogen (Rockville, MD). PDGF-BB was a kind gift from the lab of Dr. Paul DiCorleto (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) or was purchased from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Thrombin and EGF were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA) and Et-1 was from Peninsula Laboratories, Inc. (San Carlos, CA). Anti-phospho-S473-Akt, anti-phospho-T308-Akt, anti-Akt, anti-phospho-ERK, anti-ERK, and anti-phospho-p38 antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-MEK2, anti-MKK6, and anti-p38 antibodies were from StressGen (Victoria, BC, Canada).
Cell Culture and Transfection.
HEY, Ovca420, Ovca429,
Ovca432, and Ovca433 ovarian cancer cells were from Dr. G. Mills or Dr.
R. Bast, MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). MDA-MB-231 and T-47D
breast cancer cells were from American Type Culture Collection
(Manassas, VA). GI-101A cells were from the Goodwin Institute for
Cancer Research, Inc. (Plantation, FL). PC-3 cells were from Dr. Warren
Heston (Cleveland Clinic Foundation). All of the above cell lines were
maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)
at 37oC with 5% CO2. A2780
cells (also from Dr. G. Mills) were maintained in DMEM/Ham's F12
medium (1:1) supplemented with 10% FBS. HeLa cells (from American Type
Culture Collection) were maintained in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS.
MCF10A immortalized breast cells were obtained from the Karmanos Cancer
Institute (Detroit, MI) and cultured as recommended by the provider.
All cells were cultured in serum-free media for 24 to 48 h before
lipid treatment. For transient transfections, cells were plated into
35-mm dishes and transfected with DNA using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen)
and Transfection Booster Reagents (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA)
according to the manufacturers' instructions. Transfected cells were
used within 48 h after transfection. Transfection efficiency was
detected by lacZ transfection and
-galactosidase staining. Dominant
negative and constitutively active MEK were from Dr. D. Templeton (Case
Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH). Kinase inactive p38 and
constitutively active MKK6 were from Dr. Bryan R.G. Williams (Cleveland
Clinic Foundation). Dominant-negative and constitutively active Rho
were from Dr. Wouter Moolenaar, (Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The C3-exoenzyme construct and
constitutively active PI3-K (p110-
isoform) were provided by Dr.
Alan Wolfman (Cleveland Clinic Foundation).
Nonradioactive Immunoprecipitation Akt Kinase Assay.
The Akt
kinase assay was performed with the Nonradioactive Akt Kinase Assay Kit
(Cell Signaling Technology) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. All reagents were provided with the kit. Briefly, cells
were treated with LPA or S1P, rinsed with ice-cold PBS, and then lysed
in cell lysis buffer. Immunoprecipitation was carried out using
immobilized Akt 1G1 monoclonal antibody. The immunoprecipitate was then
incubated with GSK-3 fusion protein and ATP in kinase buffer. Western
analyses were used to determine the extent of GSK-3 phosphorylation by
active Akt using a phospho-GSK-3
/
(Ser21/9) antibody.
Western Blot Analysis. After treatment with LPA, S1P, or other stimuli, cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS, and then lysed in SDS sample buffer. Samples were electrophoresed through 10 to 12% SDS polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Immunoblot analyses were carried out using the appropriate antibodies. Specific proteins were detected with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).
Quantitative RT-PCR of LPA/S1P Receptor Expression. Total RNA was extracted from cells using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI). Total RNA (1-5 µg) was reverse transcribed using Superscript II RT (Invitrogen). Derived cDNA (8 ng) was used as a template for real-time quantitative SYBR Green I PCR. Primer sequences for S1P1 (Edg-1), S1P2 (Edg-5), S1P3 (Edg-3), LPA1 (Edg-2), and LPA2 (Edg-4) were kindly provided by Dr. Ed Goetzl (UCSF) and are as follows: S1P1, 5'GCAGCAGCAAGATGCGAAG and 5'CGATGAGTGATCCAGGCTTTT; S1P2, 5'GCGCCATTGTGGTGGAA and 5'GAGCCAGAGAGCAAGGTATTGG; S1P3, 5'CTGGTGACCATCGTGATCCTC and 5'ACGCTCACCACAATCACCAC; LPA1, 5'GCTGGTGATGGGACTTGGAAT and 5'CAACCCAGCAAAGAAGTCTGC; and LPA2, 5'ACGCTCAGCCTGGTCAAGAC and 5'AACCATCCAGGAGCAGTACCAC. Primer sequences for S1P5 (Edg-8) and LPA3 (Edg-7) were developed in our lab and are: S1P5, 5'CGCCTTCATCGTGCTAGAGA and 5'AGATCCGACAACGTGAGGCT; and LPA3, 5'TCCAACCTCATGGCCTTCC and 5'GACCCACTTGTATGCGGAGAC. GAPDH was amplified in a separate tube as a housekeeping gene with primers 5'GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGT and 5'GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC. All SYBR Green I core reagents, including AmpliTaq Gold polymerase, were from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). The thermal cycling conditions were 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C, 1 min. PCR reactions and product detection were carried out in an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Amplified product was detected by measurement of the fluorescent dye, SYBR Green I, which was added to the initial reaction mixture and binds proportionally to double-stranded DNA. After completion of the PCR, a fixed threshold (DNA amount reflected by bound fluorescent dye) was selected based on the manufacturer's suggestion, and the number of cycles (the threshold cycle, or CT) required to amplify the target to reach this threshold was used for calculations. The comparative CT method (User Bulletin #2; Applied Biosystems) was used to determine relative amounts of each receptor. The comparative CT method is similar to the standard curve method, except that it uses arithmetic formulas derived by Applied Biosystems to achieve the same results for relative quantitation. For this method to be valid, the efficiencies of the target (i.e., LPA/S1P receptor) and reference (i.e., GAPDH) must be approximately equal. We have validated the amplification efficiencies of each of our targets to meet this requirement.
Measurement of Caspase-3 Activity. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates, grown to 80% confluence, and then cultured overnight in serum-free media. The following day, cells were pretreated with or without various reagents, followed by exposure to paclitaxel for the indicated periods of time. Cells were then washed with PBS and lysed in caspase-3 assay kit cell lysis buffer (Calbiochem). Caspase-3 activity was measured by cleavage of the fluorogenic substrate N-acetyl-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-amino-4-methylcoumarin with the Caspase-3 Assay Kit (Calbiochem).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LPA and S1P Induced Akt Activation in HEY Ovarian Cancer Cells in a
PI3-K-, MEK-, and p38-Dependent Manner.
LPA and S1P are present
in ovarian cancer ascites and are likely to be involved in
proliferation and survival of ovarian tumor cells. We have shown that
LPA and S1P stimulate ovarian cancer cell proliferation (Xu et al.,
1995a
; Hong et al., 1999
). However, the effects and mechanisms of
LPA/S1P-induced PI3-K/Akt activation in ovarian cancer cells have not
previously been reported. To investigate the effects of LPA and S1P on
Akt activation in HEY ovarian cancer cells, we treated these cells with
physiological concentrations of LPA and S1P, and then measured the
activity of Akt with an Akt kinase assay. LPA (10 µM) and S1P (1 µM) induced activation of Akt compared with the untreated control
(Fig. 1). To determine the mechanism of
LPA/S1P-induced Akt activation, and in particular, to test whether
there is an interaction between a major cell proliferation signaling
pathway (MEK/ERK) and a major cell survival pathway (PI3-K/Akt), we
examined the sensitivity of Akt activation induced by LPA and S1P to
three specific inhibitors of PI3-K, MEK, and p38 MAPK: LY294002,
PD98059, and SB203580, respectively. Pretreatment of HEY cells with all
three of these inhibitors abolished activation of Akt by LPA and S1P
(Fig. 1), suggesting a dependence on PI3-K, MEK, and p38 for
LPA/S1P-induced Akt activation.
|
Time- and Concentration-Dependent Akt S473 Phosphorylation Induced
by LPA and S1P.
Akt activation is mediated through phosphorylation
of S473 and T308. Western blot analyses with Akt-S473-phospho-specific antibodies were used to measure LPA/S1P-induced S473 phosphorylation of
Akt. LPA and S1P induced a time-dependent Akt S473 phosphorylation in
HEY cells (Fig. 2, A and B). HEY cells
displayed a low basal level of Akt S473 phosphorylation, which was not
increased over the time course (Fig. 2A). Both LPA and S1P induced a
time- and concentration-dependent S473 phosphorylation of Akt,
occurring as early as 5 min, with maximal stimulations of Akt S473
phosphorylation occurring at 20 min (Fig. 2B) and at 10 µM for LPA
and 1 µM for S1P (Fig. 2C). Our results demonstrate that at
concentrations of LPA greater than 10 µM, the Akt and ERK
phosphorylation levels are significantly decreased compared with 10 µM LPA (Fig. 2C and data not shown). Furthermore, there is a
correlation between the fold-change decrease in phosphorylation of Akt
and ERK (with LPA concentrations greater than 10 µM). LPA and S1P had
relatively narrow optimal concentration ranges for Akt activation. We
observed a similar phenomenon in LPA-induced thymidine incorporation
(Xu et al., 1995b
). The relationship between these effects is currently under investigation.
|
PI3-K and Gi-Dependent T308 and S473 Akt
Phosphorylation by LPA and S1P.
Because phosphorylation of both
T308 and S473 are necessary for the complete activation of Akt, we
examined the ability of LPA and S1P to stimulate Akt T308
phosphorylation. Both LPA and S1P were able to induce an approximately
4- to 6-fold increase in Akt phosphorylation at T308 in HEY cells (Fig.
3). To determine whether S473 and T308
phosphorylation of Akt by LPA and S1P were dependent on PI3-K activity,
we examined the effect of the specific PI3-K inhibitor, LY294002, on
Akt phosphorylation. LPA- and S1P-induced S473 and T308 phosphorylation
of Akt were completely abolished by pretreatment of cells with LY294002
(10 µM) (Fig. 3). The dependence on PI3-K was further confirmed by
pretreatment with wortmannin (150 nM), a second, structurally
different, specific inhibitor of PI3-K (Fig. 3).
|
LPA- and S1P-Induced Akt S473 and T308 Phosphorylation Are
Dependent on MEK, but Only S473 Phosphorylation Is p38-Dependent, and
MEK Is Upstream of p38.
Phosphorylation of both S473 and T308 is
essential for the full activation of Akt. However, Akt S473 and T308
may be phosphorylated through different mechanisms. Because
LPA/S1P-induced Akt enzymatic activation was MEK- and p38-dependent
(Fig. 1), we determined whether phosphorylation of Akt S473 and T308 by
LPA/S1P also were MEK- and p38-dependent. We used PD98059 and SB203580
as specific inhibitors of MEK (the upstream kinase of ERK) and p38,
respectively. To use the optimal concentration of these inhibitors, we
performed titration analyses and observed that PD98059 at 3, 10, and 30 µM had an inhibitory effect on LPA/S1P-induced ERK and Akt
phosphorylation of approximately 60, 90, and 100%, respectively.
Similarly, SB203580 at 1, 3, and 10 µM had an inhibitory effect on
LPA/S1P-induced p38 and Akt phosphorylation of approximately 60, 90, and 100%, respectively. PD98059 (30 µM) completely inhibited Akt
S473 and T308 phosphorylation induced by LPA and S1P (Fig.
4A, 1 and 2), suggesting that MEK, and
potentially its downstream target, ERK, was involved in phosphorylation
of Akt at both S473 and T308. Interestingly, we found that although
SB203580 (10 µM) completely abolished Akt S473 phosphorylation
induced by both LPA and S1P (Fig. 4A, 1), T308 phosphorylation was not
altered by pretreatment with up to 30 µM SB203580 (Fig. 4A, 2). These
results suggest that p38 activation is required for LPA/S1P-induced Akt
S473, but not T308, phosphorylation.
|
-galactosidase staining, when we used the
Transfection Booster Reagents (Transfection Booster #3;
Experimental Procedures). The overexpression of genetically
altered MEK or p38 was evidenced by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4B, 7
and 8). Consistent with the results induced by pharmacological
inhibitors (Fig. 4A, 1 and 2), Akt S473 and T308 phosphorylation
induced by LPA and S1P was inhibited ~70 to 80% by MEK/2A (Fig. 4B,
1 and 2). Transfection with p38/AGF resulted in decreased Akt S473 but
not T308 phosphorylation (Fig. 4B, 1 and 2). In addition, transfection
with MEK/2A resulted in decreased ERK and p38 activation, whereas
transfection with p38/AGF inhibited only p38 (~80%), not ERK
(<15%), phosphorylation (Fig. 4B, 4 and 5). These results confirmed
the data obtained from pharmacological inhibitors and indicate that 1)
activation of both MEK and p38 MAPK are necessary for the S473
phosphorylation of Akt; 2) activation of MEK, but not p38 MAPK, is
necessary for the T308 phosphorylation of Akt; 3) MEK acted upstream of
p38; and 4) ERK activation, in the presence of kinase inactive p38, was
not sufficient to activate Akt in HEY cells. Therefore, these data
suggest that the action of MEK was mediated through p38 to ultimately
lead to Akt S473 phosphorylation induced by LPA and S1P in HEY cells.
To determine whether activated MEK and/or MKK6 (an upstream activator
of p38) were sufficient to phosphorylate Akt at S473 and/or T308, we
transfected HEY cells with constitutively active MEK (MEK/2E) and MKK6
(MKK6/2E). Interestingly, although both MEK/2E and MKK6/2E were
sufficient to induce phosphorylation of Akt at S473, neither could
stimulate T308 phosphorylation in the absence of stimuli (Fig. 4C, 1
and 2). These data indicate that MEK is both necessary and sufficient
for S473 phosphorylation and necessary but insufficient for T308
phosphorylation of Akt.
Because our data indicated that MEK acted upstream of p38, we examined
whether the activation of MEK was sufficient to activate p38 and
whether MKK6 had any effect on p38 and ERK activation. Results show
that in addition to Akt, MEK/2E was also sufficient for ERK and p38
activation (Fig. 4C, 4 and 5). On the other hand, MKK6/2E activated p38
(Fig. 4C, 5), but did not affect either the basal level or
LPA/S1P-induced ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 4C, 4). Whereas the potency
of p38 activation by MEK/2E was similar to the levels induced by LPA
and S1P, it was lower than that induced by MKK6/2E (compare lanes 4-6
with lanes 7-9 in Fig. 4C, 5). These results further confirmed that
MEK was upstream of p38 and MEK was capable of activating p38 in HEY
cells, although not as strongly as constitutively active MKK6.
We have shown that Akt S473 and T308 phosphorylation induced by LPA and
S1P were dependent on both Gi and PI3-K (Fig. 3). To determine whether ERK and p38 were downstream of
Gi and PI3-K, we tested the effects of PTX and
LY294002 on LPA- and S1P-induced ERK and p38 activation. Inhibition of
Gi or PI3-K with PTX or LY294002, respectively,
inhibited LPA- and S1P-induced activation of ERK and p38 (Fig. 4D),
suggesting that both Gi and PI3-K are upstream of
ERK and p38. PI3-K-dependent ERK/p38 activation was further confirmed
by overexpression of constitutively active PI3-K, which was sufficient
for activation of ERK and p38 in HEY cells (Fig. 4E). Furthermore,
treatment with both PD98059 and SB203580 could inhibit induction of
phosphorylated Akt by constitutively active PI3-K (Fig. 4F), indicating
that PI3-K is dependent on MEK and p38 for Akt S473 phosphorylation.
This was confirmed by overexpression of genetic inhibitors (MEK/2A and
p38/AGF), which also resulted in a decrease in Akt phosphorylation by
constitutively active PI3-K (data not shown).
MEK-Dependent Akt S473 Phosphorylation Is Specific to LPA, S1P, and
PDGF, but Not Thrombin, EGF, Et-1, or Insulin.
The kinase activity
of Akt was
90% inhibited by SB203580 (Fig. 1) and the
phosphorylation of Akt S473, but not T308, was sensitive to both
SB203580 and transfection with MEK/2A, suggesting that S473
phosphorylation was essential for the majority of the Akt kinase
activity in this system. Therefore, we focused the rest of our studies
on the mechanisms of Akt S473 phosphorylation induced by LPA and S1P.
Akt can be activated by a variety of growth factors through their
receptors, as well as via a number of GPCR ligands. We sought to
determine whether MEK-dependent S473 phosphorylation of Akt in HEY
cells was specific to LPA and S1P. Treatment of HEY cells with PDGF (10 ng/ml), thrombin (1 U/ml), EGF (10 ng/ml), Et-1 (100 nM), or insulin
(100 nM) for 5 min induced S473 phosphorylation of Akt (Fig.
5A). The phosphorylation of Akt by all
five of these stimuli was PI3-K-dependent as evidenced by pretreatment
with LY294002 (data not shown). Pretreatment of cells with SB203580 (3-10 µM) resulted in inhibition of Akt S473 phosphorylation induced by PDGF, EGF, thrombin, and Et-1, but not insulin, indicating that p38
activation is required by most stimuli tested (Fig. 5A). In contrast,
of these factors tested, only PDGF required activation of MEK for S473
phosphorylation of Akt as evidenced by the sensitivity of this
activation to pretreatment with PD98059 (Fig. 5A), suggesting that
MEK-dependent Akt S473 phosphorylation is stimulus-specific. This was
further supported by transient transfection with MEK/2A, which resulted
in decreased Akt S473 phosphorylation by PDGF but not Et-1, even though
the latter also activated ERK, which was sensitive to the dominant
inhibitory effect of MEK/2A (Fig. 5B).
|
LPA, but Not S1P or PDGF, Requires Rho for S473 Phosphorylation of
Akt, and Rho Is Upstream of PI3-K.
To test the potential
involvement of Rho in Akt S473 phosphorylation induced by LPA, S1P, and
PDGF, we transiently transfected HEY cells with dominant negative Rho
(Rho/N19) or C3-exoenzyme. Interestingly, overexpression of Rho/N19 or
C3-exoenzyme resulted in decreased Akt S473 phosphorylation by LPA, but
not S1P (Fig. 6A, 1). Furthermore, LPA,
but not S1P, required Rho for phosphorylation of ERK and p38 (Fig. 6A,
3 and 4). Similar to S1P, overexpression of Rho/N19 did not inhibit
PDGF-induced Akt S473 phosphorylation (Fig. 6B). Transfection with
constitutively active Rho (Rho/V14) demonstrated that Rho was
sufficient for S473 phosphorylation of Akt in HEY cells (Fig. 6C, 3rd
column).
|
MEK/ERK-Dependent Akt S473 Phosphorylation Is Cell
Line-Specific.
In contrast to what we have observed in HEY cells
with LPA and S1P, the S473 phosphorylation of Akt induced by fMLP,
Fc-
R cross-linking, or PIP3 in human
neutrophils was insensitive to pretreatment with PD98059 (Rane et al.,
2001
). To determine whether this MEK-dependent S473 phosphorylation of
Akt by LPA and S1P was cell-type-specific, we tested five other
ovarian cancer cell lines (Ovca420, Ovca429, Ovca432, Ovca433, A2780),
three breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, T-47D, and GI-101A), and
HeLa (cervical cancer), PC-3 (prostate cancer), and MCF10A
(immortalized breast epithelial) cells. In all cell lines tested,
except the immortalized breast MCF10A cell line (Fig.
7C), LPA and S1P induced a 1.7- to
10.1-fold increase in Akt S473 phosphorylation (Table
1). Whereas MCF10A cells were the only
cells in this study that did not respond to LPA/S1P for Akt
phosphorylation, we have observed that LPA and S1P can induce Akt
activity in other noncancerous cell lines (specifically, Swiss 3T3
cells or mouse embryonic fibroblasts; unpublished observations). Thus,
a simple, generalized conclusion pertaining to the effects of LPA and
S1P on Akt induction in cancerous versus noncancerous cells cannot be
drawn through our limited studies.
|
|
72% inhibition; Table 1). In addition, HeLa and T-47D
cells were also sensitive to pretreatment with both inhibitors. Among
the remaining cell lines, MCF10A cells were nonresponsive to LPA and
S1P (Fig. 7C), MDA-MB-231 cells were partially sensitive to both
inhibitors and PC-3 and GI-101A cells were sensitive to only SB203580.
These experiments have been repeated more than three times in each cell
line and the results (average ± SD) are presented in Table 1.
This data suggests that although p38 was required for LPA/S1P-induced
S473 phosphorylation of Akt in all 11 responsive cell lines tested, the
MEK-dependent Akt phosphorylation induced by LPA and S1P is specific to
certain cell lines.
We tested the PD98059-insensitive cell lines to demonstrate that LPA
and S1P could activate ERK in these cell lines, and the concentration
of PD98059 used blocked ERK activation in these cells (Fig. 7, A and B,
and other data not shown). Therefore, the insensitivity of
LPA/S1P-induced Akt phosphorylation to PD98059 was not due to either
the inability of LPA/S1P to induce ERK activation or a variation in
cell line sensitivity to PD98059. The results from Ovca420 (Fig. 7A)
and GI-101A (Fig. 7B) are shown as representative results from cells
that were PD98059-sensitive and -insensitive in LPA/S1P-induced Akt
S473 phosphorylation, respectively. In both of these cell lines, LPA
and S1P induced ERK activation, which was blocked by PD98059 but not by
SB203580 (Fig. 7, A and B, middle).
The LPA/S1P Receptors Potentially Involved in Mediating the S473
Phosphorylation of Akt.
Three [LPA1
(Edg-2), LPA2 (Edg-4), and
LPA3 (Edg-7)] and five
[S1P1 (Edg-1), S1P2
(Edg-5), S1P3 (Edg-3), S1P4
(Edg-6), and S1P5 (Edg-8)] GPCRs have been
identified as receptors for LPA and S1P, respectively. To determine
which of these receptors might be associated with the MEK-dependent Akt
activation in different cell lines, we examined the expression of
S1P1-3, S1P5, and
LPA1-3 in all cell lines used in this study with
quantitative real time RT-PCR (Table 2).
Because S1P4 is predominantly expressed in
lymphocytes (Graler et al., 1998
; Van Brocklyn et al., 2000
), and all
of our cell lines are of epithelial origin, the expression of this
receptor was not determined in our studies. The comparative threshold
cycle (CT) method (Experimental
Procedures) was used to calculate the relative expression of each
receptor in different cell lines. We arbitrarily chose the expression
level of LPA2 in HEY cells (relative to GAPDH in
these cells) as 1-fold. The expression levels of all other receptors in
HEY and all other cell lines (relative to GAPDH in the corresponding
cell lines) are expressed as fold-change relative to this 1-fold
expression of HEY LPA2 (Table 2). The LPA/S1P
receptor expression levels in HEY cells obtained through our studies
are consistent in principle with the levels reported by Fischer et al.
(2001)
, using a semiquantitative RT-PCR method (Fischer et al., 2001
).
In our studies, we considered 1-fold expression to be low, because
LPA2 was previously detected at a very low level
in HEY cells using a semiquantitative RT-PCR method (Fischer et al.,
2001
). Thus, when the fold expression of the receptor was below 1.0 in
our studies, we considered it to be very low or not expressed.
|
Caspase-3 Activity Induced by Paclitaxel in Hey Cells Was Inhibited
by LPA and S1P.
Akt has been described as a mediator of survival
signals in many cell types (Marte and Downward, 1997
), including
ovarian cancer cells (Liu et al, 1998
; Yuan et al., 2000
). Furthermore, LPA has been shown to prevent HEY cell death induced by
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (Frankel and Mills, 1996
).
Because paclitaxel is a potent apoptotic inducer in many ovarian cancer
cell lines, we investigated the potential for LPA and S1P to prevent
paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in HEY cells and whether the effect was
related to the PI3-K signaling pathway. We used a caspase-3 activity
assay as a sensitive measurement of the effect of paclitaxel on HEY
cells. Caspase-3 activity was measured in HEY cells treated for various
times and concentrations of paclitaxel, and it was determined that
optimal caspase-3 activity occurred after 24 h treatment with 1 µM paclitaxel (data not shown). Pretreatment of cells for 20 min with
LPA (10 µM) and S1P (1 µM) inhibited (
45%) caspase-3 activity
induced by paclitaxel (Fig. 8).
Pretreatment with LY294002, PD98059, and SB203580, followed by
treatment with LPA and S1P, and then paclitaxel, reinstated caspase-3
activity (Fig. 8). These results suggest that the PI3-K/MEK/p38 signaling pathway mediates LPA/S1P-induced inhibition of caspase-3 activity, which is the same signaling pathway leading to
LPA/S1P-stimulated Akt S473 phosphorylation in HEY cells. Therefore,
Akt may mediate the LPA/S1P-induced caspase-3 inhibition in HEY ovarian
cancer cells. A schematic of the pathways leading to Akt activation by LPA and S1P in HEY cells is shown in Figure
9.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the signaling pathways of p38, MEK/ERK, and Akt activation induced by various stimuli, including LPA and S1P, have been studied in many cellular systems, a number of novel and important signaling mechanisms have been revealed through the current study. First, our work indicates for the first time that p38 is a relatively general requirement for the S473 phosphorylation of Akt, with the exception of insulin-induced Akt activation. The signaling mechanisms leading to p38 activation, however, seem to be highly cell line- and stimulus-specific. Second, we have observed LPA/S1P-induced cross communication between the two major kinase cascades (MAPK and PI3-K/Akt) involved in cell proliferation and cell survival, respectively, in ovarian cancer cells. Finally, our study reveals a cell line- and stimulus-specific MEK-dependent Akt activation, and we have explored the potential role of LPA and S1P receptors that confer a MEK-dependent Akt activation.
p38 Is a Relatively General Requirement for the S473
Phosphorylation of Akt.
Full activation of Akt requires
phosphorylation at both S473 and T308, which is usually regulated by
different signaling mechanisms (Alessi et al., 1997
; Pullen et al.,
1998
). T308 is phosphorylated by PDK1, which has been cloned and
identified (Alessi et al., 1997
). Our current understanding of the
mechanism of S473 phosphorylation and the identification of PDK2 is
still elusive and controversial. At least four different kinases have
been suggested to be potential candidates of PDK2: Akt itself, PDK1,
ILK1, and MK2 (Chan and Tsichlis, 2001
). Because S473 can be
phosphorylated when Akt is inactive, Akt autophosphorylation clearly
cannot account for all of the S473 phosphorylation induced under
different conditions. Although it has been suggested that PDK1 can
acquire PDK2 activity, PDK1 is not necessary for S473 phosphorylation,
which can occur even in PDK1-knockout ES cells. In cells stimulated
with insulin, ILK is activated and enhances S473 phosphorylation
through a PI3-K-dependent mechanism. However, it is likely that ILK
may contribute indirectly to S473 phosphorylation of Akt by providing
an adaptor function. The major obstacle for recognizing MK2 as one of
the PDK2 candidates arises from the fact that MK2 is not involved in
S473 phosphorylation induced by insulin in HEK 293 cells (Alessi et
al., 1996
). However, the recent work by Rane et al. (2001)
illustrates
the possibility that MK2 functions as PDK2 under certain conditions.
Our data seem to support works from both Alessi et al. (1996)
and Rane et al. (2001)
suggesting that at least two types of signaling pathways
are involved in S473 phosphorylation. One type of signaling pathway,
which does not require MK2 and/or p38 for S473 phosphorylation, may be
represented by cells that respond to insulin, insulin-like growth
factor, heat shock, or hydrogen peroxide (Shaw et al., 1998
). Another
signaling pathway, in which MK2 functions as PDK2, may be represented
by cells, such as neutrophils, stimulated by fMLP, Fc-
R
cross-linking, PIP3 (Rane et al., 2001
), and
other potential stimuli.
The Signaling Pathways That Regulate p38 Activity Seem to Be Highly
Specific.
For example, although PI3-K is required for Akt
activation in both keratinocytes (Zhang et al., 2001
) and HEY cells
(Fig. 1), we show that PI3-K is both necessary and sufficient to induce ERK and p38 activation in HEY cells (Fig. 4), whereas in keratinocytes, p38 is activated by a PI3-K-independent pathway (Zhang et al., 2001
).
Thus, p38 activation can be PI3-K-dependent or -independent, depending
on the system. Furthermore, our results show that MEK is an upstream
activator of p38 in MEK-dependent (and hence, p38-dependent) cellular
systems. In MEK-independent cellular systems, p38 is still required for
Akt activation. Thus, our results suggest that p38 can be activated by
MEK-dependent or -independent pathways. The mechanisms regulating p38
activity in different systems require further investigation.
Cross Communication between the MAPK and PI3-K/Akt Cascades.
Although simultaneous stimulation of the ERK and PI3-K/Akt pathways has
been reported previously, the requirement of MEK/ERK for Akt activation
was either not examined or MEK/ERK and Akt were shown to be unrelated
to each other. One of the novel and important findings of our work
presented here is that MEK is a necessary and sufficient activator of
Akt, and MEK functions upstream of p38 in
Gi/PI3-K/Akt signaling in a cell- and
stimulus-specific manner. In particular, all six ovarian cancer cell
lines tested demonstrate MEK/ERK-dependent Akt activation. These
studies have revealed an integration of two important signaling
pathways (MAPK and PI3-K/Akt) that govern two important tumorigenic
processes (cell proliferation and survival, respectively). This is of
potential therapeutic importance for ovarian cancer because both LPA
and S1P 1) have been detected in ovarian cancer plasma and ascites (Xiao et al., 2000
; Xiao et al., 2001
), 2) protect ovarian cancer cells
from paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in a manner dependent on the MAPK and
PI3-K pathways (Fig. 8), 3) regulate pro-angiogenic factors in ovarian
cancer (Hu et al., 2001
; Schwartz et al., 2001
) and 4) affect ovarian
cancer cell proliferation, migration, and/or survival (Xu et al.,
1995a
, 2001
; Frankel and Mills, 1996
; Hong et al., 1999
; Lu et al.,
2002
).
MEK-Dependent Akt Phosphorylation Is Cell Line- and
Stimulus-Specific.
Our study reveals a cell line- and
stimulus-specific MEK-dependent Akt activation. Interestingly, while
this article was in preparation, a MEK-dependent Akt activation by
ultraviolet B irradiation was reported by Nomura et al. (2001)
. Thus,
our results are consistent with these recent findings. However,
although Nomura et al., reported a MEK- and p38-dependent
T308 phosphorylation of Akt by ultraviolet B radiation in mouse
epidermal cells (Nomura et al., 2001
), our results show for the first
time that Akt T308 phosphorylation is dependent on MEK, but not p38, in
HEY cells. Thus, similar to MEK-induced Akt S473 phosphorylation, the
requirement of p38 activity for Akt T308 phosphorylation may be cell
line- and/or stimulus-specific and remains to be further investigated.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Drs. Bryan R.G. Williams and Joe DiDinato for their critical reading of this manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 27, 2002; Accepted May 28, 2002
This work was supported in part by an American Cancer Society Grant RPG-99-062-01-CNE, U.S. Army Medical Research grant DAMD 17-99-1-9563, and National Institutes of Health Grant R21-CA84038-01 (to Y.X.).
Address correspondence to: Dr. Yan Xu, Department of Cancer Biology, NB-40, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail: xuy{at}ccf.org
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; S1P, sphingosine-1-phosphate; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PI3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKB, protein kinase B; PTX, pertussis toxin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; MK2, mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase-2; PDK, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase; ILK, integrin-linked kinase; PIP3, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; Et-1, endothelin-1; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LY294002, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one; PD98059, 2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone; SB203580, 4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)1H-imidazole; FBS, fetal bovine serum; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptioon-polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; p-ERK, phospho-specific extracellular signal-regulated kinase; p-p38, phospho-specific p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Wu, H. Kausar, P. Johnson, D. E. Montoya-Durango, M. Merchant, and M. J. Rane Hsp27 Regulates Akt Activation and Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Apoptosis by Scaffolding MK2 to Akt Signal Complex J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21598 - 21608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhao, D. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y. Xiao, S. Sengupta, Y. Xiao, R. Zhang, K. Lauber, S. Wesselborg, L. Feng, et al. Caspase-3-dependent Activation of Calcium-independent Phospholipase A2 Enhances Cell Migration in Non-apoptotic Ovarian Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 29357 - 29368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-Q. Jin and J. S. Karliner Low dose N, N-dimethylsphingosine is cardioprotective and activates cytosolic sphingosine kinase by a PKC{varepsilon} dependent mechanism Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2006; 71(4): 725 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. French, J. J. Upson, S. N. Keller, Y. Zhuang, J. K. Yun, and C. D. Smith Antitumor Activity of Sphingosine Kinase Inhibitors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2006; 318(2): 596 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ren, Y.-j. Xiao, L. S. Singh, X. Zhao, Z. Zhao, L. Feng, T. M. Rose, G. D. Prestwich, and Y. Xu Lysophosphatidic Acid is constitutively produced by human peritoneal mesothelial cells and enhances adhesion, migration, and invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3006 - 3014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lee, R. F. Swaby, Y. Liang, S. Yu, S. Liu, K. H. Lu, R. C. Bast Jr., G. B. Mills, and X. Fang Lysophosphatidic Acid Is a Major Regulator of Growth-Regulated Oncogene {alpha} in Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2740 - 2748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Kang, Y. D. Yoon, M. H. Han, S.-B. Han, K. Lee, K. H. Lee, S.-K. Park, and H. M. Kim Glabridin Suppresses Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression in Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-Stimulated Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells by Blocking Sphingosine Kinase Pathway: Implications of Akt, Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase, and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B/Rel Signaling Pathways Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 941 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pchejetski, M. Golzio, E. Bonhoure, C. Calvet, N. Doumerc, V. Garcia, C. Mazerolles, P. Rischmann, J. Teissie, B. Malavaud, et al. Sphingosine Kinase-1 as a Chemotherapy Sensor in Prostate Adenocarcinoma Cell and Mouse Models Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 65(24): 11667 - 11675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Q. Dong and F. Liu PDK2: the missing piece in the receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathway puzzle Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2005; 289(2): E187 - E196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Goparaju, P. S. Jolly, K. R. Watterson, M. Bektas, S. Alvarez, S. Sarkar, L. Mel, I. Ishii, J. Chun, S. Milstien, et al. The S1P2 Receptor Negatively Regulates Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Induced Motility and Proliferation Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2005; 25(10): 4237 - 4249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Hu, N. Haney, D. Kropp, A. F. Kabore, J. B. Johnston, and S. B. Gibson Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) Protects Primary Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells from Apoptosis through LPA Receptor Activation of the Anti-apoptotic Protein AKT/PKB J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 9498 - 9508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Suomalainen, V. Pentikainen, and L. Dunkel Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Inhibits Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Activation and Germ Cell Apoptosis in the Human Testis Independently of Its Receptors Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2005; 166(3): 773 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-L. Chen, J. Y. Grey, S. Thomas, F.-H. Qiu, R. M. Medford, M. A. Wasserman, and C. Kunsch Sphingosine kinase-1 mediates TNF-{alpha}-induced MCP-1 gene expression in endothelial cells: upregulation by oscillatory flow Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1452 - H1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gruber, B. Kandler, C. Jindra, G. Watzak, and G. Watzek Dental Pulp Fibroblasts Contain Target Cells for Lysophosphatidic Acid Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2004; 83(6): 491 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gonzalez, G. Tripathi, E. J. Carter, L. J. Cobb, D. A. M. Salih, F. A. Lovett, C. Holding, and J. M Pell Akt2, a Novel Functional Link between p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathways in Myogenesis Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(9): 3607 - 3622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pervin, R. Singh, W. A. Freije, and G. Chaudhuri MKP-1-Induced Dephosphorylation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Is Essential for Triggering Nitric Oxide-Induced Apoptosis in Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines: Implications in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8853 - 8860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirose, M. Katayama, D. Stokoe, D. A. Haas-Kogan, M. S. Berger, and R. O. Pieper The p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Links the DNA Mismatch Repair System to the G2 Checkpoint and to Resistance to Chemotherapeutic DNA-Methylating Agents Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2003; 23(22): 8306 - 8315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tan, M. Groszer, A. M. Tan, A. Pandya, X. Liu, and C.-W. Xie Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Cascade Facilitates {micro}-Opioid Desensitization in Sensory Neurons by Altering G-Protein-Effector Interactions J. Neurosci., November 12, 2003; 23(32): 10292 - 10301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||