|
|
|
|
Vol. 62, Issue 3, 747-755, September 2002
1-Adrenoceptor
Molecular Pharmacology Group (A.J.M., G.M.), Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; and Arena Pharmaceuticals (F.-Y.Z., D.B., D.C.), San Diego, California
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Constitutive activity of wild-type and mutant forms of human
1- and
2-adrenoceptors was measured by
guanosine
5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate
([35S]GTP
S) binding assays using fusion proteins
between these receptors and Gs
. Constitutive activity of
the
1-adrenoceptor is enhanced by mutation of
Leu322. The ability of ligands to suppress receptor
instability and produce up-regulation is often associated with
constitutively active mutants.
Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor, but not wild type,
was up-regulated by exposure to the
1-adrenoceptor
selective blocker betaxolol. More extensive sequence alterations of the
1-adrenoceptor were generated to mimic the initially
described constitutively active mutant (CAM) of the
2-adrenoceptor that is up-regulated strongly by
betaxolol. Substitution of amino acids 316 to 324 of the
1-adrenoceptor with the equivalent
1b-adrenoceptor sequence did not result in up-regulation
by betaxolol. However, these forms of both
1- and
2-adrenoceptors displayed substantial and equivalent
constitutive activity. The addition of the Leu322Lys
mutation into the
1b-adrenoceptor substituted
1-adrenoceptor to produce the
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor allowed substantially greater levels of up-regulation by betaxolol without enhancement of
constitutive [35S]GTP
S binding.
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor was up-regulated
strongly by betaxolol but displayed lower constitutive activity than
did other mutants. Binding of [35S]GTP
S binding to all
the fusion proteins was increased substantially by isoprenaline.
Despite the ability of betaxolol to cause up-regulation of many
mutants, only for the
CAM
2-adrenoceptor-Gs
and
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion proteins was
the basal binding of [35S]GTP
S decreased by betaxolol.
Clear resolution between receptor constitutive activity and
ligand suppression of receptor instability can be obtained for mutant
-adrenoceptors, and potential inverse agonists do not function
equally at phenotypically apparently equivalent CAM receptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the
1- and
2-adrenoceptors respond to the same natural
ligands, are highly homologous, are often coexpressed, and can both
elevate intracellular levels of cAMP, they have a number of distinct
properties. These include their different distributions in cells in
which they are coexpressed (Rybin et al., 2000
; Steinberg and Brunton,
2001
) and potentially in their effectiveness of coupling to the G
protein Gs
(Levy et al., 1993
), although this
has not been observed in all studies (Guerrero and Minneman, 1999
).
Another point of difference is in their degree of agonist-independent or constitutive activity. In general, higher levels of
agonist-independent signal transduction are noted for the
2-adrenoceptor than for the
1-adrenoceptor (Zhang et al., 2000
; Zhou et
al., 2000
; Engelhardt et al., 2001
). The degree of constitutive
activity of many receptors can be enhanced by mutation in a number of
regions of the sequence (Leurs et al., 1998
; Pauwels and Wurch, 1998
;
Gether, 2000
). In the case of the
2-adrenoceptor, such studies have concentrated on alterations at the interface of the third intracellular loop and the
sixth transmembrane domain. Although less studied, mutation of a single
amino acid in this region (Leu322) of the
1-adrenoceptor can also result in
enhanced constitutive activity (Lattion et al., 1999
). The most studied
constitutively active mutant (CAM) of the
2-adrenoceptor was produced by the replacement
of a short segment of the distal region of the third intracellular loop
with the homologous region from the
1b-adrenoceptor (Samama et al., 1993
). An
interesting feature of this receptor is that it is physically
destabilized compared with the wild-type
2-adrenoceptor (Gether et al., 1997
), and this
can be suppressed by the binding of ligands. Thus in the face of
ongoing synthesis, the addition of
2-adrenoceptor ligands to cells expressing the CAM
2-adrenoceptor results in up-regulation of
the polypeptide (Pei et al., 1994
; MacEwan and Milligan, 1996
; McLean
et al., 1999
; Ramsay et al., 2001
). This has been demonstrated to
provide a useful means to identify, without any a prioiri
knowledge, ligands that interact with the receptor (Milligan et al.,
2002
).
In this study, we generated and analyzed markedly destabilized mutants
of the human
1-adrenoceptor and developed a
novel [35S]GTP
S binding assay to measure the
constitutive activity of such mutants that is based on the
immunoprecipitation of receptor-Gs
fusion
proteins (Stevens et al., 2001
). Parallel use of these two strategies
overcomes the historical limitations in attempts to measure
receptor-dependent guanine nucleotide exchange on
Gs
(Wieland and Jakobs, 1994
) and allows the
determination of the relative constitutive activity of different
receptor mutants.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
All materials for tissue culture were supplied by
Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
[3H]Dihydroalprenolol (40 Ci/mmol) and
[35S]GTP
S (1250 Ci/mmol) were from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). Oligonucleotides were purchased
from Interactiva (Ulm, Germany). Sources of all other reagents have
been described previously (Stevens et al., 2000
, 2001
).
Construction of Mutants and Fusion Proteins.
CAM mutations
within the human WT
1-adrenoceptor were
generated using a three-reaction PCR approach. Boldface type represents the nucleotides designed to introduce the desired mutations. First, PCR
[95°C for 5 min (95°C for 1 min, 51°C for 1 min, and 73°C for
2 min) for 20 cycles; 73°C for 10 min) on WT
1-adrenoceptor cDNA with a forward mutagenic
primer
(Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor,
CTC GTG GCC CTA CGA CGC GAG CAG AAG GCG AAA AAG ACG;
CAM
1-adrenoceptor, CTC GTG GCC TCA
CGC GAG AAG AAG GCG GCCAAG ACG; or
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor, CTC GTG GCC TAC
CGC GAG AAG AAG GCG AAA AAG ACG) and a reverse
primer tagged with a VSV sequence (Feng et al., 2002
), also containing
a unique restriction site, XhoI, and a silent mutation
creating a new unique restriction site, PvuII (GAT ACT GGG
CTA TCC GCT CGA GTC GCT GTC CGC AGC TGC CCC), generated a super primer
used in a subsequent PCR extension reaction. This reaction (95°C for
6 min, 51°C for 1 min, and 73°C for 12 min) generated an amplicon
or template for the third and last PCR reaction [95°C for 5 min
(95°C for 1 min, 42°C for 1 min, and 73°C for 1 min) for 20 cycles; 73°C for 10 min). This generated a final product of 600 bases, using a forward primer with a unique restriction site,
NotI (CCA GCG CGG CCG CCC), and a VSV reverse primer (GAT ACT GGG CTA TCC). This product was digested with NotI and
XhoI and subsequently ligated into human
1-adrenoceptor cDNA, which was also digested
with NotI and XhoI.
1-adrenoceptor mutant was generated using the
same principle. The mutagenic primer used was CAT TGC CCT GGA
CGC CTA CCT CGC CAT, and the reverse primer was
tagged with a VSV sequence and contained a unique restriction site,
NotI, and a silent mutation creating a new unique
restriction site, ApaI (GAT ACT GGG CTA TCC GCG GCC GCG CGG
GCC CGC CGA). The forward primer used in the third PCR reaction
contained a FLAG sequence and a unique Hind III site (AAA
AAA AAG CTT GCC ACC ATG GAC TAC AAG GAC GAC GAT GAT AAG GGC GCG GGG GTG CTG).
A
CAM
2-adrenoceptor-Gs
(long isoform) fusion protein was generated using the
Gs
portion of a WT
2-adrenoceptor-Gs
construct in a PCR reaction [95°C for 5 min (95°C for 1 min,
55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min) for 20 cycles; 72°C for 10 min) with forward XhoI primer (AAA AAC TCG AGG GCT GCC TCG
GCA ACA GTA AG) and a reverse XbaI primer (AAA AAT CTA GAT
TAG AGC AGC TCG TAT TG). Consequently, a
CAM
2-adrenoceptor-Renilla
reniformis luciferase construct (Ramsay et al., 2001
fragment from the PCR in-frame with the
CAM
2-adrenoceptor.
WT
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
and
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
were generated by PCR [95°C for 5 min (95°C for 1 min, 60°C for
1 min, and 72°C for 2 min) for 20 cycles; 72°C for 10 min] of WT
1-adrenoceptor and
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor,
respectively, with forward NheI primer (AAA AAG CTA GCG CCA
CCA TGG ATA CTG GGC TAT CCG GCG CGG GGG TGC TC) and reverse
KpnI primer (AAA AAA GGT ACC CAC CTT GGA TTC CGA GGC) followed by the digestion of product with these two enzymes. The Gs
portion of a WT
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion construct was used in a PCR reaction [95°C for 5 min (95°C
for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min) for 20 cycles;
72°C for 10 min[ with forward KpnI primer (AAA AAA GGT
ACC GGC TGC CTC GGC AAC AGT AAG) and a reverse XbaI primer
(AAA AAT CTA GAT TAG AGC AGC TCG TAT TG). The
Gs
1-Kb product was digested with
KpnI and XbaI and ligated along with WT
1-adrenoceptor into pcDNA3.1(+) digested with
NheI and XbaI. The new WT
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
construct was now digested with NotI and XhoI to
insert the mutant CAM
1-adrenoceptor fragments
generated previously.
Transient Transfection of HEK293 Cells. HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 0.292 g/l L-glutamine and 10% (v/v) newborn calf serum at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cells were grown to 60 to 80% confluence before transient transfection in 100-mm dishes. Transfection was performed with the use of 5 µg of cDNA construct using LipofectAMINE reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Up-Regulation Studies and Sample Preparation.
Transiently
transfected cells were treated with or without ligand in cell culture
medium (concentrations are indicated in figure legends) for 0 to
72 h. Cell monolayers were washed three times in PBS (2.7 mM KCl,
137 mM NaCl, and 1.5 mM
KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and then
scraped into tubes and centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm. Cell pellets
were ruptured in Tris/EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris, and 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4)
by 50 passes of a glass-on-Teflon homogenizer. The resulting suspension
was centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was
subsequently centrifuged at 50,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The
resulting pellet was resuspended through a syringe and attached to a
25-gauge needle. Membranes were quantified, placed into aliquots
accordingly, and stored at
80°C.
Immunoblotting.
Membrane sample (40 µg) prepared in
Laemmli buffer was loaded onto a 1-mm thick 4 to 12% Bis-Tris
precast gel (Invitrogen) and electrophoresed in MOPS buffer for
approximately 1 h at 200 V. Protein was transferred from the gel
to nitrocellulose membrane for 1 h at 30 V. The membrane was
blocked overnight in 5% (w/v) nonfat milk at 4°C. Once washed
briefly in PBS 0.1% and Tween 20, the membrane was exposed to
anti-
1-adrenoceptor antiserum (Santa Cruz
Biochemicals, Santa Cruz, CA) at a dilution of 1:1000 in 1% (w/v)
nonfat milk for 2 h at room temperature. After washing the
membrane 3 times in PBS and 0.1% Tween 20, it was then exposed to
secondary anti-rabbit antiserum (Amersham Biosciences Inc., Piscataway,
NJ) at a dilution of 1:10000 for 1 h. Again, the membrane was
washed thoroughly. To develop the blot, enhanced chemiluminescence reagent was added to the membrane for 5 min. The membrane was then
exposed to film, and the film was developed.
[3H]Dihydroalprenolol Binding Studies.
Saturation binding studies were performed using Tris/EDTA/MgCl buffer
(75 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, and 12.5 mM MgCl2, pH
7.4) in 96-well blocks using 5 to 20 µg of membrane preparation with
0.1 to 10 nM [3H]dihydroalprenolol and 10 µM
propranolol or betaxolol for nonspecific binding at the
2- and
1-adrenoceptor
constructs, respectively. For displacement binding studies, 0.5 or 1.0 nM [3H]dihydroalprenolol was used for the
2- and
1-adrenoceptor
constructs, respectively, along with a range of concentrations of
isoprenaline (10
10-10
3
M). After incubation at 30°C for 45 min, samples were harvested onto
96-well filters with ice-cold Tris/EDTA buffer (75 mM Tris, and 1 mM
EDTA, pH 7.4). Once soaked in scintillation fluid for 1 h or more,
the filters were counted in a Packard Top Count scintillation counter
(Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA). Because all studies were performed on
crude membrane preparations, the data represent the full cellular
receptor complement and not only receptors present at the cell surface.
[35S]GTP
S Binding.
[35S]GTP
S binding experiments were initiated
by the addition of membranes containing 10 fmol of the
-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion constructs to an
assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 3 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1 µM GDP, 0.2 mM ascorbic acid, and 50 nCi
[35S]GTP
S) containing the indicated
concentrations of receptor ligands. Nonspecific binding was determined
in the same conditions but in the presence of 100 µM GTP
S.
Reactions were incubated for 10 min at 30°C and were terminated by
the addition of 0.5 ml of ice-cold buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH
7.4, 3 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl. The samples
were centrifuged at 16,000g for 15 min at 4°C, and the
resulting pellets were resuspended in solubilization buffer (100 mM
Tris, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1.25% Nonidet P-40) plus 0.2% SDS.
Samples were precleared with normal rabbit serum followed by
immunoprecipitation with C terminus of Gs
(CS) antiserum (Milligan and Unson, 1989
). Finally, the immunocomplexes were
washed twice with solubilization buffer, and bound
[35S]GTP
S concentration was estimated by
liquid-scintillation spectrometry.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mutation of Leu322 of the
1-adrenoceptor can enhance the capacity of
this receptor to elevate cAMP levels in the absence of a ligand
(Lattion et al., 1999
). This elevated constitutive activity is
dependent on the identity of the replacement amino acid, but Lys seems
particularly effective (Lattion et al., 1999
). Sustained treatment of
HEK293 cells transiently expressing the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor with the
1-adrenoceptor selective blocker betaxolol had
no significant effect on the levels of this receptor, as monitored
subsequently by the specific binding of
[3H]dihydroalprenolol to membranes prepared
from these cells (Fig. 1). In contrast,
equivalent treatment of cells expressing the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor
resulted, over time, in a significant up-regulation, whether levels of
the mutated receptor were assessed in
[3H]dihydroalprenolol binding studies (Fig. 1A)
or by immunoblotting cell membrane fractions with a selective
anti-
1-adrenoceptor antiserum (Fig. 1B). In
such immunoblots, both the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor and the various other forms of
the
1-adrenoceptor used in these studies (see
below) migrated as a distinct doublet with apparent molecular
masses of 45 and 60 kDa. It is likely that these represent
differentially glycosylated forms of the receptor.
|
The originally described CAM of the
2-adrenoceptor was produced by the
substitution of a short segment of the distal section of the third
intracellular loop of this receptor with the equivalent section from
the hamster
1b-adrenoceptor (Samama et al.,
1993
). Because the
1-and
2-adrenoceptors are highly homologous in this region with only two variations in sequence (Fig.
2), we generated a form
(CAM
1-adrenoceptor) of the
1-adrenoceptor in which the
1b-adrenoceptor sequence replaced the
wild-type
1-adrenoceptor sequence in this
region (Fig. 2). However, although the
CAM
2-adrenoceptor is strongly up-regulated by
exposure to betaxolol (Fig. 3), the effects of this ligand on the
CAM
1-adrenoceptor were very modest (Fig. 3)
and, indeed, insignificant. The
CAM
1-adrenoceptor sequence has Ala rather than
Lys at position 322 (Fig. 2). Although the Leu322Ala
1-adrenoceptor
has been reported to display enhanced constitutive activity compared
with wild-type, this is not as great as for the
Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor
(Lattion et al., 1999
). We thus introduced Lys into this position in
the CAM
1-adrenoceptor to generate the CAMK
1-adrenoceptor (Fig. 2). The
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor was up-regulated to a
significantly greater degree by sustained exposure to betaxolol than
either the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor or the
CAM
1-adrenoceptor (Fig. 3). However, this
effect was still less impressive than for the
CAM
2-adrenoceptor (Fig. 3). None of the
mutants of the
1-adrenoceptor bound
[3H]dihydroalprenolol with affinity that was
substantially different from that of the wild-type receptor (Table
1), but each of the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor, the
CAM
1-adrenoceptor, and particularly the
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor bound the agonist
isoprenaline with significantly higher affinity than did the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor (Table 2).
|
|
|
|
Although enhanced agonist affinity and up-regulation of protein levels
in response to ligand challenge are properties often associated with
receptors that display elevated constitutive activity, we wished to
examine this directly. Constitutive activity of
Gs
-coupled receptors is most often measured at
the level of cAMP generation. However, a direct and potentially more
quantitative approach is to measure guanine nucleotide exchange on
Gs
induced by the receptor. Previously, this
has been very difficult to monitor because of the low rates of basal
guanine nucleotide exchange of Gs compared with
that of Gi-family G proteins (Wieland and Jakobs,
1994
). To address this, we generated fusion proteins between each of the wild-type, the Leu322Lys, the CAM, and the
CAMK forms of
1-adrenoceptor and the long isoform of Gs
. When these were expressed in
HEK293 cells, prior saturation
[3H]dihydroalprenolol binding studies monitored
expression levels in membrane preparations and allowed the addition of
equal amounts (10 fmol) of each construct to
[35S]GTP
S binding assays, even though the
various constructs were expressed at markedly different levels (Table
1). At the termination of the experiment, the samples were
immunoprecipitated with an antiserum (CS), that identifies the extreme
C terminus of Gs
(Milligan and Unson, 1989
)
before scintillation counting. In the absence of ligand, the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
construct bound very low levels of nucleotide. However, in individual
studies, this amount was increased between 20- and 30-fold when the
experiments were performed in the presence of 10 µM isoprenaline
(Fig. 4A). The binding of
[35S]GTP
S to the
Leu322Lys-, CAM-, and
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion proteins in the absence of agonist was substantially higher than
that for the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein (Fig. 4), and binding of the nucleotide to each fusion
protein increased in a linear fashion with time over at least a 20-min
period (Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate that each of these mutated
forms of the
1-adrenoceptor is indeed
substantially more constitutively active in its capacity to exchange
the guanine nucleotide on Gs
and hence
activate the G protein than the wild-type receptor. Moreover, the
extent of constitutive activity was not different between these three
mutants (Fig. 4). Many CAM receptors remain responsive to agonist
ligands, indicating that the conformational changes associated with the mutations are not equivalent to those produced by agonist binding. The
addition of isoprenaline to [35S]GTP
S
binding assays using each of the Leu322Lys-,
CAM-, and
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion proteins also resulted in a large increase in nucleotide binding
(Fig. 4), although when calculated as a fold increase over basal, this
increase was much less than that for the construct containing the
wild-type receptor because of the very low levels of nucleotide
incorporation into the fusion protein containing the wild-type receptor
in the absence of agonist. The basal incorporation of
[35S]GTP
S into the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein was sufficiently low that it was not feasible to examine
possible inverse agonism of ligands. However, the extra basal
incorporation into the mutated
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion proteins allowed such an examination. For the
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor, this was reduced significantly by the presence of 10 µM betaxolol (Fig. 4), indicating this ligand to be an inverse agonist at this construct. However, betaxolol did not produce a significant reduction in basal binding of
[35S]GTP
S to either the
CAM
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein or the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor-containing construct (Fig. 4).
|
Parallel experiments were performed using fusion proteins between both
the wild-type and CAM
2-adrenoceptors and
Gs
(Fig. 5A).
Basal incorporation of [35S]GTP
S into the
wild-type
2-adrenoceptor-Gs
construct was again low (although significantly higher than for the
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein) and increased greatly in response to isoprenaline (Fig.
5A). The same amount of
CAM
2-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein, again monitored by the specific binding of
[3H]dihydroalprenolol, produced markedly
elevated levels of nucleotide binding in the absence of ligand (Fig.
5A). This was also increased substantially by isoprenaline and
inhibited significantly by betaxolol (Fig. 5A). Increased binding of
[35S]GTP
S in immunoprecipitates of
endogenously expressed Gs
could also be
produced by the addition of isoprenaline to membranes of cells
transfected to express the isolated
2-adrenoceptor (Fig. 5B). However, the
agonist-induced signal was substantially weaker than when studies were
performed using equal amounts of the GPCR-G protein fusion (Fig. 5B).
Furthermore, no significant constitutive activity of the isolated
receptor to activate Gs
could be observed when
compared with mock-transfected cells (Fig. 5B).
|
The addition of Gs
to the C terminus of
constitutively active forms of either the
1-
or
2-adrenoceptor did not alter the capacity
of betaxolol to cause their up-regulation as monitored in subsequent
[3H]dihydroalprenolol binding studies (Fig.
6). The extent of up-regulation of the
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein was the same as for the isolated
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor, and the same was true for comparisons between
CAM
2-adrenoceptor-Gs
and the CAM
2-adrenoceptor (Fig. 6). Equally,
fusion of Gs
to the C terminus of the
wild-type forms of the
1-adrenoceptor or the
2-adrenoceptor did not allow significant
up-regulation by betaxolol (Fig. 6).
|
In certain receptors, such as the histamine H2
receptor (Alewijnse et al., 2000
), mutations within the highly
conserved DRY domain at the interface of transmembrane helix III and
the second intracellular loop produce significant receptor instability
and the capacity of receptor blockers to produce very high degrees of
up-regulation of these mutants. We thus also produced an
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor
and generated an
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein. The addition of membranes containing equal amounts of
the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
and
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion proteins to [35S]GTP
S binding assays
followed by immunoprecipitation with the anti-Gs
antiserum demonstrated that the
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor
was capable of producing enhanced guanine nucleotide exchange on
Gs
in the absence of ligand (Fig.
7A). However, the extent of constitutive
activity in this mutant was significantly lower than for the series of
mutants at the intracellular loop III/transmembrane helix VI interface
examined earlier. Although the
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor
constructs bound [3H]dihydroalprenolol with
equivalent affinity to the other
1-adrenoceptor mutants used in this study
(Table 1), this form of the receptor did not display an affinity that
was higher than that of the wild-type receptor to bind isoprenaline
(Table 2). This form of the receptor, both with and without C-terminal
attachment of Gs
, was up-regulated, however,
by betaxolol treatment at least as effectively as the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor
(Fig. 7B). Furthermore, as we noted previously for the
CAM
2-adrenoceptor (Ramsay et al., 2001
),
ligand-induced up-regulation was not restricted to antagonist/inverse
agonist ligands. Up-regulation of both the
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
and the
Arg156Ala
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
constructs was produced to similar extents by sustained exposure to
isoprenaline (Fig. 7C). There was, however, ligand specificity for
up-regulation because neither of these constructs was up-regulated by
exposure to the markedly
2-adrenoceptor-selective blocker ICI118551
(10µM) (Fig. 7C), which does cause up-regulation of the
CAM
2-adrenoceptor (McLean et al., 1999
; Ramsay
et al., 2001
).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of studies have noted that the
1-adrenoceptor displays relatively low levels
of constitutive activity compared with the
2-adrenoceptor (Lattion et al., 1999
; Zhou et
al., 2000
). However, enhanced signal transduction in the absence of
agonist that correlates with expression levels of this receptor has
been noted (Engelhardt et al., 2001
). The basis for the differences between these two
-adrenoceptors is unclear but may relate to their
differential targeting in cells because it seems that the
2-adrenoceptor is more selectively targeted to
detergent-insensitive membrane domains that also allow marked
concentration of heterotrimeric G proteins (Rybin et al., 2000
).
Although constitutively active mutants of the
2-adrenoceptor that have a markedly higher
capacity for signaling in the absence of agonist have been widely
studied (Samama et al., 1993
; MacEwan and Milligan, 1996
; Gether et
al., 1997
; Ramsay et al., 2001
), much less information is available on
the
1-adrenoceptor. In many regards, this is
surprising given the quantitative importance of this receptor in
cardiac function. Moreover, the single available study on
constitutively active mutants of the
1-adrenoceptor concentrated on a mutation of a single (Leu322) amino acid (Lattion et al.,
1999
).
Many constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors are
significantly destabilized compared with the wild type (Samama et al.,
1993
; MacEwan and Milligan, 1996
; Gether et al., 1997
; Li et al.,
2001a
,b
), and this can frequently be overcome by the binding of ligands
to the mutated receptor. Such ligand-induced stabilization can be
visualized directly if the mutant receptor is tagged with a fluorescent
protein (McLean et al., 1999
) or converted to a useful ligand screen if
tagged with an enzyme whose activity is easy to measure (Ramsay et al.,
2001
). Leu322Lys was the most constitutively
active point mutant of the
1-adrenoceptor reported by Lattion et al. (1999)
. Sustained treatment of cells expressing this mutant with the
1-adrenoceptor
selective blocker betaxolol resulted in significant up-regulation of
the number of [3H]dihydroalprenolol binding
sites and immunodetected amounts of the polypeptide, whereas equivalent
treatment of cells expressing the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor was without effect. The
originally defined CAM
2-adrenoceptor is known
to be up-regulated strongly by sustained treatment with betaxolol (Pei
et al., 1994
; MacEwan and Milligan, 1996
). This was confirmed in
the present studies, but an equivalent mutant of the
1-adrenoceptor in which the same segment of
the
1b-adrenoceptor was substituted was little
affected by treatment with betaxolol (Fig. 3). An examination of the
sequences of the adrenoceptors in this region (Fig. 2) showed that
Leu322 of the
1-adrenoceptor was altered to Ala by
substitution of the segment from the
1b-adrenoceptor. Although the
Leu322Ala
1-adrenoceptor
has been reported to display a significant level of constitutive
activity, it was not as marked as the Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor (Lattion et al., 1999
). We thus
further modified the CAM
1-adrenoceptor to
encode Lys at residue 322. This construct was up-regulated
significantly more strongly by treatment with betaxolol.
Most studies that examine the constitutive activity of receptors
monitor agonist-independent regulation of either second-messenger levels or activity of a reporter gene construct. However, direct analysis of the activation of the relevant G protein provides inherently the most direct and quantitative measure. The most popular
assay is to measure elevation of the binding of
[35S]GTP
S. Historically, however, this has
been extremely difficult for G proteins other than those in the
Gi-family because of combinations of their low
basal guanine nucleotide exchange and relatively low expression levels
(Wieland and Jakobs, 1994
). We recently overcame these problems for the
Gq/G11 family of G proteins
by combining receptor G-protein fusion proteins (Milligan, 2002
) with
their effective immunoprecipitation after a
[35S]GTP
S binding assay (Stevens et al.,
2001
). We thus used the same strategy for the
1-adrenoceptor and
Gs
. Fusion proteins were constructed between
the wild-type and various mutants of the
1-
and
2-adrenoceptor and the long isoform of
Gs
. Initially, we confirmed that the
C-terminal addition of Gs
did not alter the
effects of betaxolol on the extent of up-regulation of the
-adrenoceptors. Satisfied that this was the case (Fig. 6), we used
membranes expressing these constructs to explore the loading of
[35S]GTP
S. Immunoprecipitation of the
constructs with an antiserum directed to the extreme C terminus of
Gs
resulted in very low levels of
[35S]GTP
S to the
1-adrenoceptor-Gs
fusion protein in the absence of agonist. This could have been
interpreted either as reflecting low levels of agonist-independent
activation of the construct or that the basic assay concept was flawed.
However, [35S]GTP
S binding was increased
some 20- to 30-fold by the addition of a maximally effective
concentration of isoprenaline. The very low level of
[35S]GTP
S binding in the absence of ligand
is consistent with previous indications that the wild-type
1-adrenoceptor has low basal constitutive activity (Lattion et al., 1999
). However, when the CAMK mutant was
fused to Gs
and the same amount of this
construct was assayed, the level of
[35S]GTP
S binding in the absence of agonist
was markedly greater than that produced for the wild-type construct.
Furthermore, betaxolol was shown to act as an inverse agonist for the
CAMK
1-adrenoceptor because this ligand reduced
the basal [35S]GTP
S binding. As validation
for this assay, equivalent studies were also performed with
Gs
fusions incorporating the wild-type and CAM
forms of the
2-adrenoceptor. As anticipated
from previous studies, the CAM
2-adrenoceptor
produced marked levels of [35S]GTP
S binding
in the absence of ligand, and this was inhibited in the presence of
betaxolol (Fig. 5A). Although the ability of ligands to modulate the
binding of [35S]GTP
S to fusion proteins
containing the
2-adrenoceptor and Gs
has been monitored previously (Seifert et
al., 1999
; Milligan, 2002
), such studies have not incorporated an
immunoprecipitation step. Thus, in general, such studies have been
restricted to experiments performed in systems such as insect Sf9 cells
that have low levels of expression of endogenous
Gi family G proteins that elevate the background
signal in mammalian cells and thus limit the signal to noise and
sensitivity of assays. Prior 3H-ligand binding
studies also allowed for the addition of the same amount of the fusion
constructs containing different mutations in the receptors to each
[35S]GTP
S binding assay, and thus they
allowed direct comparisons of the level of constitutive activity
imparted to the GPCR by each set of mutations. This was of particular
relevance in these studies because mutations that imbue constitutive
activity are known to alter levels of expression and stability of the receptor.
Mutations and alterations of the
1-adrenoceptor that introduced similar levels
of constitutive activity (Fig. 4) did not result in an equivalent
capacity of an antagonist/inverse agonist to suppress this activity.
Thus, although betaxolol has been described previously as an effective
inverse agonist at the CAM
2-adrenoceptor (MacEwan and Milligan, 1996
) and clearly functioned in this manner for
the CAMK
1-adrenoceptor, this was not obviously
the case for the
Leu322Lys
1-adrenoceptor
(Fig. 4). This may indicate that not all constitutively active mutants
of the same receptor should be considered to be equivalent and,
individual ligands may suppress this activity to different degrees in
what might have been considered to be phenotypically similar GPCR
mutants. It is also obvious that none of the mutants used in these
studies caused a level of binding of
[35S]GTP
S in the absence of ligands such
that it was not increased markedly by the presence of the agonist
isoprenaline. Thus although it has been suggested that such mutants may
represent good models of the agonist-occupied or R* states of GPCRs
(Samama et al., 1993
; Scheer and Cotecchia, 1997
), the current studies
clearly indicate that they represent, at best, a rough approximation of an agonist-induced state. Other GPCRs may display significant agonist-independent G protein activation, and it is noteworthy that the
wild-type melanocortin MC4 receptor, at which the
agouti-related peptide functions as an endogenous antagonist/inverse
agonist (Adan and Vink, 2001
), displays high levels of constitutive
activity in this type of assay (G. Milligan, L. Ormiston, W. Nijenhuis, and R. Adan, unpublished observations). It is also of interest that
mutant
1-adrenoceptors displaying similar
levels of constitutive activity to load
[35S]GTP
S onto Gs
were not up-regulated to the same extent by treatment with betaxolol.
It may be instructive to note in this regard that the largest degree of
betaxolol-induced up-regulation was produced with the
1-adrenoceptor mutant (CAMK), at which
betaxolol clearly did function as an inverse agonist. It is also
noteworthy that although there were marked differences in the
steady-state levels of expression of the various forms of the
1-adrenoceptor (Table 1), there was no obvious
correlation between these and the extent of up-regulation produced by
betaxolol treatment.
These studies confirm that mutations in hot spots at the end of
transmembrane region III and the interface of transmembrane helix VI
and the third intracellular loop can generate forms of the GPCR with
elevated constitutive activity and provide a novel direct assay for the
extent of activation of G proteins by such mutant GPCRs. However, at
least for the
1-adrenoceptor, there is no
obvious direct correlation between the level of constitutive activity
of such mutants and their apparent structural instability. An
equivalent conclusion has been reached recently for distinct CAM forms
of the
1b-adrenoceptor (Stevens et al., 2000
).
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 15, 2002; Accepted May 23, 2002
Address correspondence to: Graeme Milligan, Davidson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, United Kingdom. E-mail: g.milligan{at}bio.gla.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
[35S]GTP
S, guanosine
5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate;
CAM, constitutively active mutant;
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
WT, wild-type;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
CS, C terminus of
Gs
;
ICI118551, (±)-1-(2,3-[dihydro-7-methyl-1H-inden-4-yl]oxy)-3-([1-methylethyl]-amino)-2-butanol.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-adrenergic receptor in
1-receptor transgenic mice.
Mol Pharmacol
60:
712-717
-1-adrenergic receptor.
FEBS Lett
457:
302-306[CrossRef][Medline].
2-adrenoceptor-green fluorescent protein fusion proteins.
Mol Pharmacol
56:
1182-1191
subunit of Gs promotes its removal from the plasma membrane.
Biochem J
260:
837-841[Medline].
1b-adrenoceptor.
Mol Pharmacol
58:
438-448
following fusion to the
1b-adrenoceptor. Palmitoylation of G11
is not required for interaction with
/
complex.
J Biol Chem
276:
35883-35890
-Thio)triphosphate binding by G proteins.
Methods Enzymol
237:
1-13.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Hildebrandt Bring Your Own G Protein Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1079 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ott, Y. Neldner, R. Cebe, I. Dodevski, and A. Pluckthun Engineering and functional immobilization of opioid receptors Protein Eng. Des. Sel., March 1, 2005; 18(3): 153 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ott, R. Frischknecht, and A. Pluckthun Construction and characterization of a kappa opioid receptor devoid of all free cysteines Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 1, 2004; 17(1): 37 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-Y. Zeng, A. J. McLean, G. Milligan, M. Lerner, D. T. Chalmers, and D. P. Behan Ligand Specific Up-Regulation of a Renilla reniformis Luciferase-Tagged, Structurally Unstable Muscarinic M3 Chimeric G Protein-Coupled Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2003; 64(6): 1474 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-J. Feng, E. Kellett, C. A. Scorer, J. Wilde, J. H. White, and G. Milligan Selective Interactions between Helix VIII of the Human {micro}-Opioid Receptors and the C Terminus of Periplakin Disrupt G Protein Activation J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33400 - 33407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||