![]() |
|
|
Section on Biochemical Physiology, Pulmonary-Critical Care Medical Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
Received March 11, 2003; accepted March 17, 2003
PDEs belong to a large superfamily [11 different gene families (PDEs
111)] of structurally related, functionally distinct, and highly
regulated enzymes (Francis et al.,
2001
). Most PDE families comprise more than one gene (
20 PDE
genes), which generate multiple protein products (>50 PDE proteins) via
alternative mRNA splicing or use of different promoters/transcription
initiation sites. Most cells contain representatives of multiple PDE gene
families, but in different amounts, proportions, and subcellular locations.
PDE5 isoforms, for example, are relatively abundant in vascular smooth muscle,
including the pulmonary vasculature and corpus cavernosum of the penis, where
they apparently regulate hydrolysis of cGMP pools that modulate vasodilation
(Corbin and Francis, 2002
;
Corbin et al., 2002
).
This Perspective will focus on the confluence of our understanding
of the biological and pharmacological roles of NO, cGMP, one specific PDE,
PDE5, and PDE5 inhibitors in regulation of smooth muscle relaxation, penile
erection, and treatment of erectile dysfunction, as well as on important
contributions of Jackie Corbin, Sharron Francis, and others in elucidating the
complex biology of PDE5 and thus facilitating the bench-to-bedside transition
of PDE5 inhibitors (Francis et al.,
2001
; Corbin and Francis,
2002
; Corbin et al.,
2002
). The emergence of the PDE5 inhibitor, sildenafil (Viagra),
as effective therapy for erectile dysfunction finally realizes the promise and
potential of specific PDEs to serve as important therapeutic targets and of
"family-specific" PDE inhibitors to function as safe and
efficacious drugs.
Mammalian PDEs exhibit a common structural organization, with a conserved
catalytic domain (
250300 amino acids) in the C-terminal portion of
the molecules and divergent regulatory domains and modules in N-terminal
portions. The catalytic core, more highly conserved among members of each gene
family than among different gene families, contains a signature motif, common
to all PDEs, and consensus metal-binding domains
(Francis et al., 2001
). In
addition to common structural elements, the catalytic core contains
family-specific sequences, responsible for differences in substrate
affinities, catalytic activities, and sensitivities to specific inhibitors.
Some PDE families are relatively specific for cAMP (PDEs 4, 7, 8) or for cGMP
(PDEs 5,6,9); others hydrolyze both (PDEs 1, 2, 3, 10, 11)
(Francis et al., 2001
).
Although methylxanthines inhibit almost all PDEs, selective inhibitors that
are relatively specific for individual families are available (i.e., for PDEs
16). Sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil are potent, selective PDE5
inhibitors (Francis et al.,
2001
; Corbin and Francis,
2002
; Corbin et al.,
2002
).
N-terminal portions of PDE molecules are highly divergent, containing
structural determinants that allow different PDEs to respond selectively to
specific regulatory signals (Francis et
al., 2001
). These regulatory regions and modules include, for
example, sites and domains that are subject to different types of covalent
modification (e.g., phosphorylation) or that interact with allosteric ligands,
protein partners, or molecular scaffolds and thereby regulate catalytic
activity, protein/protein interactions, and/or subcellular compartmentation.
Five PDE families (PDEs 2, 5, 6, 10, 11) contain homologous so-called GAF
domains. In three families (PDEs 2, 5, and 6) classified as cGMP-binding PDEs,
GAF domains bind cGMP with high affinity but without identical functional
consequences (Francis et al.,
2001
).
Signaling pathways, in general, include mechanisms for negative feedback
control. From this perspective, PDEs are critical homeostatic regulators of
intracellular cyclic nucleotide concentrations. For example, acute increases
in cAMP activate cAMP-dependent protein kinase, phosphorylation/activation of
PDE3 and PDE4, and enhanced destruction of cAMP. Long-term elevation of cAMP
also provides negative feedback, by increasing transcription of PDE3 and PDE4
genes, indirectly resulting in increased enzymatic activities
(Francis et al., 2001
).
With respect to PDE5, Corbin and Francis, their coworkers, and others
(Francis et al., 2001
,
Mullerhausen et al., 2001; Okada and
Asakawa, 2001
; Rybalkin et al.,
2002
,
2003
;
Corbin et al., 2003
) have
reported that binding of cGMP to PDE5 GAF domains induces conformational
changes that increase affinity of the catalytic site for cGMP; binding of cGMP
to the catalytic site, in turn, increases cGMP binding to GAF domains. cGMP
binding to GAF domains also facilitates phosphorylation by cGMP-dependent
protein kinase of a specific serine near the N terminus of PDE5, which in turn
induces binding of cGMP to GAF domains and allosteric activation of PDE5
(Francis et al., 2001
,
Mullerhausen et al., 2001; Okada and
Asakawa, 2001
; Rybalkin et al.,
2002
,
2003
). Thus, elevation of
intracellular cGMP provides negative feedback control and enhances its own
destruction via direct, cGMP-induced allosteric activation of PDE5 as well as
indirect activation caused by phosphorylation of PDE5 by cGMP-dependent
protein kinase (Francis et al.,
2001
, Mullerhausen et al., 2001;
Okada and Asakawa, 2001
;
Rybalkin et al., 2002
,
2003
). Corbin, Francis, and
coworkers have also examined interactions between the catalytic and GAF
domains in PDE5 using [3H]sildenafil, which selectively interacts
with the cGMP-binding site in the catalytic domain
(Francis et al., 2001
;
Corbin and Francis, 2002
;
Corbin et al., 2002
,
2003
). Inhibition of PDE5 by
sildenafil can increase cGMP that binds to PDE5 GAF domains; this in turn
increases binding affinity of the catalytic site for sildenafil, thus
providing positive feedback in terms of sildenafil potentiating accumulation
of cGMP (Corbin et al., 2003
).
This latter effect of sildenafil, and presumably of analogous PDE5 inhibitors,
may have important pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications. The ability
of sildenafil, with Ki/Kd values
<<Km for cGMP, to indirectly up-regulate its binding to
the catalytic site of PDE5 suggests that, in tissues enriched in PDE5, PDE5
inhibitors may be sequestered/concentrated bound to PDE5.The duration of the
effects of these drugs may depend not only on their inherent chemical
properties but also on their dissociation from PDE5, which could be regulated
more by the drugs Kd values than competition with cGMP
substrate.
cGMP signaling can mediate relaxation of smooth muscle, including
trabecular smooth muscle of the corpus cavernosum
(Francis et al., 2001
;
Corbin and Francis, 2002
;
Corbin et al., 2002
). Upon
sexual stimulation, neuronal impulses augment release of NO from
nonadrenergic, noncholinergic neurons and endothelial cells in the corpus
cavernosum. NO activates soluble guanylyl cyclase and increases cGMP, inducing
relaxation of trabecular smooth muscle, arterial vasodilation, increased blood
flow, occlusion of venous outflow, and penile erection. PDE5 is relatively
abundant in the corpus cavernosum and apparently controls the cGMP pool that
regulates vascular dilation and, consequently, tumescence; specific PDE5
inhibitors enhance effects of NO on accumulation of cGMP and penile erection.
A number of factors (especially disease states characterized by impaired
endothelial function and NO signaling) can disrupt this complex biological
network and thus cause erectile dysfunction. Formation and accumulation of
cGMP seem to be critical in this process, because oral administration of the
PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil (Viagra) improves penile erection with minimal risk
of side effects and adverse events in many men with erectile dysfunction
(Corbin and Francis, 2002
;
Corbin et al., 2002
).
Despite intensive efforts to develop other PDE inhibitors as therapeutic agents, and despite impressive preclinical data with some PDE inhibitors, only sildenafil (Viagra) has fulfilled the promise of PDEs as therapeutic targets in major disease processes. PDE4 inhibitors, such as cilomilast and rofumilast, potent anti-inflammatory agents in many preclinical studies and model systems, remain in phase III clinical trials as potential therapeutic agents for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PDE3 inhibitors, which enhance myocardial contractility and inhibit platelet aggregation, failed in clinical trials of long-term treatment of cardiac failure, although milrinone is used for emergent and short-term treatment of patients hospitalized for refractory cardiac failure, and cilostazol has been approved for the treatment of intermittent claudication
Why has Viagra proven safe and efficacious? Sildenafil is a potent
inhibitor that can be administered orally, when needed, at concentrations
sufficient to inhibit PDE5, with minimal serious side effects related to
inhibition of other PDEs or non-PDE targets
(Corbin and Francis, 2002
;
Corbin et al., 2002
).
Transient, mild visual disturbances, for example, are presumably related to
inhibition of PDE6, which is almost exclusively expressed in the retina.
Viagra acts in pharmacologically optimal conditions (i.e., PDE inhibitors work
most effectively in conjunction with active cyclases) in the penis in the
presence of augmented local production of cGMP via NO-induced activation of
guanyl cyclase. This latter effect, however, is also the basis for one major
contraindication of sildenafil therapy: concurrent treatment with
nitroglycerine or other nitrates (Corbin
and Francis, 2002
; Corbin et
al., 2002
). Combination of nitrates and sildenafil can result in
severe systemic hypotension and death. In sum, Viagra therapy combines
pharmacological specificity with specific biological targeting. PDE5
inhibitors inhibit a specific target in a specific, localized environment
relatively enriched in the therapeutic target (i.e., PDE5 of the corpus
cavernosum) in the context of a circumscribed, temporally and spatially
limited, and activated biological process (i.e., NO-induced elevation of cGMP
in the penis with consequent effects on vasodilation and erection during
periods of sexual activity) (Francis et
al., 2001
; Corbin and Francis,
2002
; Corbin et al.,
2002
),
The story, of course, is not complete. With increased understanding of PDE5 biology and additional experience with PDE5 inhibitors, we may discover adverse effects arising from long-term or repeated use of these drugs, perhaps related to previously unrecognized downstream effects of cGMP on signaling and metabolic pathways, on "cross-talk" between PDE5 and other PDEs, such as PDE2 and PDE3, as well as on gene expression, including, perhaps, up-regulation of PDE5 itself. Will the presence of individual genetic backgrounds and specific modifier genes teach us limits in the applications of PDE5 inhibitors as well as fundamental new insights into NO/cGMP signaling pathways and vascular smooth muscle physiology? Given the central role of NO, will focus on erectile dysfunction catalyze research and therapeutics related to the biology of NO signaling and, especially, of neuronal and endothelial NO synthases? Perhaps a more fundamental question relates to whether the current use of PDE5 inhibitors has established a new paradigm for PDE inhibitors. As discussed above, in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, Viagra targets a specific, temporally and spatially circumscribed, and activated biological process. Will successful therapeutic PDE inhibitors depend not only on the development of more potent "family-specific" inhibitors but also, as in the case of sildenafil, on rather precise biological targeting as well as pharmacological specificity? Will successful therapeutics require drugs that target individual PDE family-isoforms in specific cells or subcellular compartments/microdomains in the context of specific, activated cAMP/cGMP signaling pathways?
On the other hand, with increased understanding of these signaling pathways
and PDE5 biology, new PDE5 inhibitors and other therapeutic agents may improve
treatment of erectile dysfunction and also expand our repertoire of treatable
diseases. For example, not only have PDE5 inhibitors proven successful in the
treatment of erectile dysfunction but they are also exhibiting promise as
vasodilators in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension
(Ghofrani et al., 2002
).
| Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Dr. Vincent Manganiello, Section on Biochemical Physiology, PCCMB, NHLBI, NIH, DHHS, Building 10, Room 5N307, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. E-mail: manganiv{at}nhlbi.nih.gov
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Corbin JD and Francis SH (2002) Pharmacology of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Int J Clin Pract 56: 453459.[Medline]
Corbin JD, Francis SH, and Webb DJ (2002) Phosphodiesterase type 5 as a pharmacologic target in erectile dysfunction. Urology 2002;60(2 Suppl 2): 411.[Medline]
Francis SH, Turko IV, and Corbin JD (2001) Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: relating structure and function. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 65: 152.[Medline]
Ghofrani HA, Wiedemann R, Rose F, Olschewski H, Schermuly RT,
Weissmann N, Seeger W, and Grimminger F (2002) Combination
therapy with oral sildenafil and inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary
hypertension. Ann Intern Med
136:
515522.
Mullershausen F, Russwurm M, Thompson WJ, Liu L, Koesling D, and
Friebe A (2001) Rapid nitric oxide-induced desensitization of the
cGMP response is caused by increased activity of phosphodiesterase type 5
paralleled by phosphorylation of the enzyme. J Cell
Biol 155:
271278.
Okada D and Asakawa S (2001) Allosteric activation of cGMP-specific, cGMP-binding phosphodiesterase (PDE5) by cGMP. Biochemistry 41: 96729679.
Rybalkin SD, Rybalkina IG, Feil R, Hofmann F, and Beavo JA
(2002) Regulation of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE5)
phosphorylation in smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem
277:
33103317.
Rybalkin SD, Rybalkina IG, Shimizu-Albergine M, Tang X-B, and Beavo JA (2003) PDE5 is converted to an activated state upon cGMP binding to the GAF A domain. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 22: 469478.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Xiong, H.-T. Lu, Y. Li, G.-F. Yang, and C.-G. Zhan Characterization of a Catalytic Ligand Bridging Metal Ions in Phosphodiesterases 4 and 5 by Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Hybrid Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Calculations Biophys. J., September 1, 2006; 91(5): 1858 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang, Q. Feng, and R. H. Cote Efficacy and Selectivity of Phosphodiesterase-Targeted Drugs in Inhibiting Photoreceptor Phosphodiesterase (PDE6) in Retinal Photoreceptors Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3060 - 3066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mancina, S. Filippi, M. Marini, A. Morelli, L. Vignozzi, A. Salonia, F. Montorsi, N. Mondaini, G.B. Vannelli, S. Donati, et al. Expression and functional activity of phosphodiesterase type 5 in human and rabbit vas deferens Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 11(2): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Morelli, S. Filippi, R. Mancina, M. Luconi, L. Vignozzi, M. Marini, C. Orlando, G. B. Vannelli, A. Aversa, A. Natali, et al. Androgens Regulate Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Expression and Functional Activity in Corpora Cavernosa Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2253 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||