![]() |
|
|
Department of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Received May 7, 2003; accepted May 7, 2003
Monoamine transporters selective for dopamine, norepinephrine, and
serotonin (5-HT) are presynaptic plasma membrane proteins responsible for the
reuptake of released transmitters from the synaptic cleft into nerve
terminals. This process not only limits the intensity and the duration of
monoamines at pre- and postsynaptic receptors but is also the primary
mechanism by which monoamine neurons maintain a transmitter pool available for
subsequent release. Pharmacological approaches, and more recently gene
targeting technologies, have revealed the profound neurochemical and
behavioral consequences of disrupting the function of each of these
transporters in mice (Gainetdinov and
Caron, 2003
). Clinically, monoamine transporters are important
pharmacological targets for many therapeutic agents currently used to treat a
variety of human conditions, including depression, obsessive-compulsive
disorder (OCD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and eating
disorders. In addition, psychostimulants, including cocaine, amphetamine, and
(+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, exhibit their rewarding and reinforcing
actions primarily by acting at monoamine transporters
(Amara and Sonders, 1998
).
Not surprisingly, monoamine transporters have been the subject of intensive
investigation by both basic and clinical researchers. Over the past few years,
we have witnessed a true explosion of information dealing with the functional
and regulatory aspects of monoamine transporters using both in vitro and in
vivo approaches (for review, see Torres et
al., 2003b
). These studies have examined the functional relevance
of transporter trafficking, modification of transporter function by
intracellular signaling, mechanisms of assembly and oligomerization,
interaction with regulatory proteins, transporter-associated currents,
structure-function analysis, brain imaging analysis with selective ligands,
and genetic ablation of transporter genes in vivo.
Given the importance of transporters in regulating monoamine homeostasis,
research efforts have recently been focused on the search for polymorphic
variations that might help explain the pathophysiology of certain human
conditions; alternatively, these variants could represent important factors
conferring disease susceptibility. In the case of the dopamine transporter, a
variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism has been identified in the
3'-untranslated region of the transporter. Alleles with 10 copies of a
40-base repeat unit have been reported in several populations of patients with
ADHD (DiMaio et al., 2003
). The
transcriptional control region of the 5-HT transporter (SERT) contains a
functional polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) consisting of an insertion (long allele, l)
or a deletion (short allele, s) of 44 bases. These polymorphic variants are
associated with differences in SERT gene expression and function that have
been proposed to be linked with anxiety, depression, ADHD, and other
mood-related disorders (Heils et al.,
1997
). However, the data thus far have not been totally
conclusive, motivating further research.
In this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Kilic and colleagues
describe the functional consequences of a single nucleotide polymorphism in
the coding region of the human SERT (Kilic
et al., 2003
). An isoleucine-to-valine substitution (I425V) in
transmembrane domain 8 of the transporter was found as a rarely occurring
variant of the human SERT. Analysis of the mutant transporter in heterologous
cells revealed an increase of
2-fold in uptake activity. This effect was
caused by an increase in both the maximal uptake activity (higher
Vmax) and the affinity of 5-HT for the transporter (lower
Km) compared with the wild-type transporter. Changes in
the levels of transporter expression at the plasma membrane were excluded as
the cause for the increase in uptake activity. Thus, the observed
gain-of-function phenotype is consistent with a change in the intrinsic
properties of the mutated transporter rather than with changes in trafficking
and/or transporter turnover. This residue is conserved in all SERT species;
however, other members of the monoamine transporter family already have a
valine residue at this position.
Interestingly, the mutant transporter was insensitive to up-regulation by a
nitric oxide-dependent pathway under conditions in which wild-type SERT
activity is increased by activation of this pathway. This observation led the
authors to suggest the intriguing possibility that the mutation might mimic
the effects of nitric oxide on the wild-type transporter. Although the effect
of increasing NO levels on SERT through the activation of adenosine receptors
has been documented in basophilic leukemia cells
(Miller and Hoffman, 1994
),
the physiological consequences of this mode of regulation in the brain are not
understood (Asano et al.,
1997
). However, the findings by Kilic and colleagues highlight the
exciting possibility that additional differences may exist in the phenotype of
the wild-type and mutant transporters. For instance, recent evidence suggests
that monoamine transporters function as oligomeric complexes
(Kilic and Rudnick, 2000
;
Hastrup et al., 2001
;
Sorkina et al., 2003
;
Torres et al., 2003a
). In that
context, naturally occurring gain- or loss-of-function transporter mutants
should display more than simple additive (gain of function) or subtractive
(loss of function) effects on transporter activity. Additional differences
might include changes in phosphorylation levels, the ability to interact with
regulatory proteins and, potentially, the differential ability of inhibitors
to block transporter uptake activity.
What is the physiological significance of this novel SERT variant? The
discovery of the I425V mutation originated in a study by Ozaki and et al.
(2003
). These authors
genotyped a population of 383 neuropsychiatric patients and healthy control
subjects. The I425V variant was detected in two unrelated patients affected
with OCD and other psychiatric disorders. Subsequent analysis of the families
of these patients with OCD revealed that six of the seven persons who were
heterozygous for the I425V allele had been previously diagnosed with OCD as
well as several other psychiatric conditions, including anorexia nervosa,
Asperger's syndrome, social phobia, and alcohol abuse.
OCD is a severe mental condition characterized by repetitive thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive actions (compulsions) accompanied by a marked impairment in life quality. Although the pathophysiology of this disease is poorly understood, effective treatment can be achieved in approximately half of patients with OCD by the use of selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors. The effectiveness of serotonergic medications in the treatment of patients with OCD has lead to the hypothesis of a serotonergic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of OCD. Consequently, the SERT gene has received considerable attention as a candidate gene for OCD.
To our knowledge, this report is the first to identify a naturally
occurring coding mutation in persons with a psychiatric condition for any of
the three monoamine transporters. In addition to the presence of the I425V
mutation, the two original probands and their two siblings were all homozygous
for the long allele of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism. Because the long allele
polymorphic variant is associated with an increased expression and function,
the combination of these two polymorphic variants should produce a further
increase in transporter activity and perhaps additional phenotypic
differences. In the study by Ozaki et al.
(2003
), most patients with OCD
did not carry the I425V mutation. However, those identified with the I425V
SERT variant were found to be resistant to treatment with selective 5-HT
reuptake inhibitors. As pointed out by the authors, it is possible that the
mutation in transmembrane domain 8 of SERT alone or in combination with the
promoter polymorphism may confer resistance to the clinical effects of SERT
inhibitors in these patients. These findings are of tremendous interest.
However, because the SERT variant was found in low frequency and a relatively
low number of individuals were genotyped, examination of larger and ethnically
diverse populations will be required to determine the true incidence and
clinical relevance of this genetic variant for OCD.
The search for polymorphic forms of monoamine transporter genes should be a
fertile approach. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms have already been described
for the human dopamine transporter and the human norepinephrine transporter
(Mazei and Blakely, 2002
;
Hahn and Blakely, 2002
;
Lin and Uhl, 2003
) but none of
these variants has been shown to change transporter function in a manner that
could contribute to a neuropsychiatric disease. When considering other
diseases, however, Shannon et al.
(1999
) have identified a
loss-of-function mutation in the coding region of the norepinephrine
transporter in a patient suffering from orthostatic intolerance and
tachycardia. The extent of the variability of SERT and other monoamine
transporters in healthy and nonhealthy populations and their potential
contributions to human conditions is just beginning.
At the structural and functional levels, these findings may provide
insights into the mechanism of transport function. Hundreds of engineered
mutations have been described in the monoamine transporter gene family. Kilic
and colleagues (2003
) have now
characterized the first gain-of-function mutation in one of these genes. It
will be of great interest to establish a full pharmacological profile of this
SERT variant and determine the mechanistic bases for its enhanced uptake
activity. Ultimately, "humanizing" a mouse with this SERT variant
might provide a useful model to examine the consequences of such mutation on
monoamine homeostasis.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Marc G. Caron, Department of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Carl Bldg, Rm. 487, Research Dr., Box 3287, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. E-mail: caron002{at}mc.duke.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Asano S, Matsuda T, Nakasu Y, Maeda S, Nogi H, and Baba A (1997) Inhibition by nitric oxide of the uptake of [3H]serotonin into rat brain synaptosomes. Jpn J Pharmacol 75: 123128.[Medline]
DiMaio S, Grizenko N, and Joober R (2003) Dopamine genes and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review. J Psychiatry Neurosci 28: 2738.[Medline]
Gainetdinov RR and Caron MG (2003) Monoamine transporters: from genes to behavior. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 43: 261284.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hahn MK and Blakely RD (2002) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human norepinephrine transporter gene assessed by pyrosequencing. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience; 2002 Nov 27; Orlando, FL. Program no. 646.14.
Hastrup H, Karlin A, and Javitch JA (2001) Symmetrical
dimer of the human dopamine transporter revealed by cross-linking Cys-306 at
the extracellular end of the sixth transmembrane segment. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 98:
1005510060.
Heils A, Mossner R and Lesch KP (1997) The human serotonin transporter gene polymorphismbasic research and clinical implications. J Neural Transm 104: 10051014.
Kilic F and Rudnick G (2000) Oligomerization of
serotonin transporter and its functional consequences. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 97:
31063111.
Kilic F, Murphy DL, and Rudnick G (2003) A human serotonin transporter mutation causes constitutive activation of transporter activity. Mol Pharmacol 64:440446.
Lin Z and Uhl GR (2003) Human dopamine transporter gene variation: effects of protein coding variants V55A and V382A on expression and uptake activities. Pharmacogenomics, in press.
Mazei MS and Blakely RD (2002) Evaluation of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human dopamine transporter. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience; 2002 Nov 27; Orlando, FL. Program no. 442.4.
Miller KJ and Hoffman BJ (1994) Adenosine A3 receptors
regulate serotonin transport via nitric oxide and cGMP. J Biol
Chem 269:
2735127356.
Ozaki N, Goldman D, Kaye WH, Plotnikov K, Greenberg BD, Rudnick G, and Murphy DL (2003) A missense mutation in the serotonin transporter is associated with a complex neuropsychiatric phenotype Mol Psychiatry, in press.
Shannon JR, Flattem NL, Jordan J, Jacob G, Black BK, Biaggioni I, Blakely RD, and Robertson D (1999) Orthostatic intolerance and tachycardia associated with norepinephrine-transporter deficiency. N Engl J Med 342: 541549.
Sorkina T, Doolen S, Galperin E, Zahnisev NR, and Sorkin A (2003) Oligomerization of dopamine transporters visualized in living cells by FRET microscopy. J Biol Chem, in press.
Torres GE, Carneiro A, Seamans K, Fiorentini C, Sweeney A, Yao WD
and Caron MG (2003a) Oligomerization and trafficking of the human
dopamine transporter. Mutational analysis identifies critical domains
important for the functional expression of the transporter. J Biol
Chem 278:
27312739.
Torres GE, Gainetdinov RR, and Caron MG (2003b) Plasma membrane monoamine transporters: structure, regulation and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 1325.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. F. Clarke, S. C. Walker, H. S. Crofts, J. W. Dalley, T. W. Robbins, and A. C. Roberts Prefrontal Serotonin Depletion Affects Reversal Learning But Not Attentional Set Shifting J. Neurosci., January 12, 2005; 25(2): 532 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Murphy, A. Lerner, G. Rudnick, and K.-P. Lesch Serotonin Transporter: Gene, Genetic Disorders, and Pharmacogenetics Mol. Interv., April 1, 2004; 4(2): 109 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||