|
|
|
|
Induced
2 Type I Collagen Gene (COL1A2) Expression in Human Fibroblasts via c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase/Activator Protein-1 Activation
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U532, Skin Research Institute, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
Received February 28, 2003; accepted May 21, 2003
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TGF-
) in keloid and scar formation, we have examined whether the
clinical benefits from 5-FU treatment may result from its capacity to
interfere with TGF-
signaling and resulting activation of type I
collagen gene expression. Using various molecular approaches to study the
mechanisms underlying 5-FU effects, we have demonstrated that 5-FU antagonizes
TGF-
driven COL1A2 transcription and associated type I
collagen production by dermal fibroblasts. In addition, 5-FU inhibits both
SMAD3/4-specific transcription and formation of SMAD/DNA complexes induced by
TGF-
. 5-FU induces c-Jun phosphorylation and activates both
AP-1-specific transcription and DNA binding. Overexpression of an antisense
c-jun expression vector, or that of a dominant-negative form of MKK4
that interferes with c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation, blocks the
inhibitory activity of 5-FU on TGF-
induced COL1A2
transcription. Furthermore, in a cellular context devoid of JNK activity
(i.e., JNK/ fibroblasts), 5-FU
inhibits neither formation of SMAD/DNA complexes nor SMAD-driven
COL1A2 transcription in response to TGF-
. Together, these
results identify 5-FU as a potent inhibitor of TGF-
/SMAD signaling,
capable of blocking TGF-
induced, SMAD-driven up-regulation of
COL1A2 gene expression in a JNK-dependent manner. We thus provide a
molecular explanation to the observed clinical benefits of 5-FU in the
treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.
The role of the transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
) as the main
factor inducing collagen gene expression leading to tissue fibrosis has been
suggested by the observation that 1) TGF-
expression often parallels
increased type I collagen gene expression in fibrotic lesions
(Nakatsukasa et al., 1990
;
Peltonen et al., 1990
;
Broekelmann et al., 1991
) and
2) TGF-
is a potent activator of extracellular matrix gene expression
both in vitro and in vivo (reviewed in
Verrecchia and Mauviel,
2002
).
The TGF-
s signal via specific serine/threonine kinase transmembrane
receptors (T
RI and T
RII) that phosphorylate cytoplasmic mediators
of the SMAD family (Massagué and
Chen, 2000
; Massagué
and Wotton, 2000
). The receptor-associated SMADs (R-SMADs), such
as SMAD2 and SMAD3, interact directly with and are phosphorylated by activated
T
RI. Upon phosphorylation, they form heteromeric complexes with SMAD4, a
common mediator for all SMAD pathways. These R-SMAD/SMAD4 complexes are
translocated into the nucleus, where they may function as transcription
factors, directly or in association with other DNA binding factors such as
Fast and Sp1 (reviewed in Massagué
and Chen 2000
; Massagué
and Wotton, 2000
). Recently, using a combined cDNA
microarray/promoter transactivation approach, we identified several skin
fibrillar collagen genes, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, and
COL5A2, to be direct SMAD3 targets downstream of TGF-
(Verrecchia et al.,
2001a
).
5-FU was first used for its antimetabolite activity. In this molecule, the
hydrogen atom in position 5' of uracil is replaced by the similarly
sized atom of fluoride, and the molecule was designed to occupy the active
sites of enzyme targets, thereby blocking metabolism. In the early 1980s, 5-FU
was investigated as an adjunct to glaucoma filtering surgery, a procedure in
which inhibition of wound healing is desirable to achieve surgical success
(Gressel et al., 1984
;
Skuta et al., 1987
). More
recently, local 5-FU application has shown some success in the treatment and
prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids
(Fitzpatrick 1999
;
Uppal et al., 2001
).
In this work, we investigated the effects of 5FU on
TGF-
induced type I collagen gene expression in human fibroblasts.
We identify c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation and subsequent c-Jun
phosphorylation in response to 5-FU as critical for the antagonism exerted by
5FU against TGF-
induced SMAD signaling and resulting
COL1A2 transactivation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 and 5-FU were purchased from R&D Systems Inc. (Minneapolis,
MN) and Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO), respectively. In all experiments,
TGF-
was used at a concentration of 10 ng/ml, which maximally induces
SMAD3/4 signaling in fibroblasts (F. Verrecchia and A. Mauviel, unpublished
results). Unless noted otherwise, 5-FU was used at a concentration of 10
µM.
Transient Cell Transfections and Reporter Assays. Transient cell
transfections were performed with Fugene-6 according to the manufacturer's
protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).
pRSV
-galactosidase was cotransfected in every experiment to
monitor transfection efficiencies. CAT activity was measured using
[14C]chloramphenicol as substrate followed by thin-layer
chromatography and quantitation with a PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences,
Uppsala, Sweden). Luciferase activity was determined with a commercial assay
kit (Promega, Madison, WI).
Plasmid Constructs. 3500COL1A2/CAT (gift from Francesco Ramirez, Mt.
Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY), and pRSV/AS-c-jun have been
described previously (Boast et al.,
1990
; Chung et al.,
1996
). pAP1-TA-lux (Mercury pathway profiling vector; BD
Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) was used to evaluate AP-1driven
transcription. Dominant-negative MKK4 expression vector was used to modulate
JNK activity (Verrecchia et al.,
2003
). To track JNK activity, we used a commercial reporter assay
based on the modification of the mammalian one-hybrid system, consisting of a
reporter plasmid, Gal4-Lux, bearing five Gal4 binding sites driving luciferase
expression, and a transactivator plasmid encoding a chimeric protein,
Gal4BD-c-Jun, consisting of the DNA binding domain of Gal4 (Gal4BD) fused to
the transactivation domain of c-Jun, the latter requiring phosphorylation by
JNK to fully transactivate Gal4-lux (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Northern Blotting. Total RNA was obtained using RNeasy (Qiagen GmbH,
Hilden Germany) and analyzed by Northern hybridization with
32P-labeled cDNA probes for COL1A2 and GAPDH as
described previously (Verrecchia et al.,
2002
). Quantitations were performed with a Storm 840
PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences).
Western Blot Analyses. Total protein cell extract (50 µg) in Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) were denatured by heating at 95°C for 3 min before resolution by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to Hybond enhanced chemiluminescence nitrocellulose filters (Amersham Biosciences), immunoblotted with either rabbit anti-type I collagen (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL), anti-phospho-c-Jun (Upstate Biotechnologies, Lake Placid, NY), anti-c-Jun (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), or anti-actin (Sigma) antibodies, all at a dilution of 1:1000 in 1x phosphate-buffered saline/5% nonfat milk for 1 h. After incubation, filters were washed and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h. Filters were then washed, developed according to chemiluminescence protocols (ECL, Amersham Biosciences), and revealed with a PhosphorImager.
Electrophoresis Mobility Shift Assays. A 3xCAGA
SMAD3/4-specific oligonucleotide (Dennler
et al., 1998
) and a consensus AP-1 binding oligonucleotide
(Promega Corp., Madison, WI) were used as probes. For supershift experiments,
nuclear extracts (57 µg) were incubated overnight at 4°C with
antisera before the binding reaction and separated electrophoretically on
native 4% acrylamide gels.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
5-FU Prevents TGF-
Induced COL1A2 Gene
Transactivation in Human Fibroblasts. We first wanted to determine whether
5-FU antagonized TGF-
driven COL1A2 promoter
transactivation in human dermal fibroblasts. As shown in
Fig. 2A, and as expected from
the literature, TGF-
enhanced 3500COL1A2/CAT activity 4- to
5-fold above control levels. Addition of 5-FU had a negligible effect on basal
COL1A2 promoter but completely abolished TGF-
response. To
determine the physiological relevance of such findings obtained with promoter
reporter constructs in transient cell transfection experiments, we next
examined whether endogenous COL1A2 expression followed the same
pattern of regulation. As a first approach to address this point, the effect
of 5-FU on TGF-
induced type I collagen gene expression was
examined, taking the COL1A2 mRNA steady-state levels as an endpoint.
As shown in Fig. 2B, Northern
analysis of total RNA with a specific COL1A2 probe revealed an
expected potent up-regulation by TGF-
(lane 2 versus lane 1, top), that
was completely prevented by 5-FU (lane 4 versus lane 2), whereas 5-FU alone
did not modify basal COL1A2 expression (lane 3 versus lane 1).
GAPDH mRNA steady-state levels were unaffected by treatments
(Fig. 2B, bottom), attesting to
the specificity of COL1A2 regulation.
|
The modulation of TGF-
induced elevation of COL1A2
mRNA steady-state levels by 5-FU translated into altered type I collagen
production, as determined by Western analysis of whole-cell lysates with an
anti-type I collagen antibody (Fig.
2C). Specifically, elevated type I collagen production in response
to TGF-
(top, lane 2 versus lane 1) was prevented by addition of 5-FU
(lane 4 versus lane 2). Actin levels (bottom) remained unchanged throughout
the experiments. Together, these results provide evidence that 5-FU
antagonizes TGF-
induced type I collagen production, and this effect of
5-FU occurs at the level of COL1A2 transcription.
5-FU Reduces SMAD-DNA Interactions. The SMAD pathway is critical for
activation of the human COL1A2 promoter by TGF-
(Chen et al., 1999
;
Zhang et al., 2000
;
Verrecchia et al., 2001a
).
Therefore, one possibility to explain the inhibitory activity of 5-FU against
TGF-
would be that it interferes with the SMAD pathway. To test this
hypothesis, two approaches were chosen. Firstly, we tested the capacity of
5-FU to alter SMAD3/4-specific transcription in a transient cell transfection
assay with the SMAD3/4-specific reporter construct (CAGA)9-lux
(Dennler et al., 1998
). As
shown in Fig. 3A, TGF-
up-regulated (CAGA)9-lux activity about 12-fold above control
values. 5-FU added 1 h before TGF-
completely abolished such
transactivation. To determine whether the blockade of SMAD3/4-dependent gene
transcription by 5-FU was caused by a capacity of the latter to interfere with
SMAD/DNA complex formation, EMSA experiments were carried out using nuclear
extracts from fibroblasts treated with TGF-
for 30 min, a time point at
which maximal amounts of SMAD/DNA complexes are formed in response to
TGF-
(Vindevoghel et al.,
1998a
,b
),
pretreated or not with 5-FU for 60 min. As shown in
Fig. 3B, SMAD/DNA complex
formation induced by TGF-
(lane 2 versus lane 1) was efficiently
prevented when 5-FU was added 60 min before TGF-
addition (lane 4 versus
lane 2). Therefore, a good correlation exists between the inhibitory effect of
5-FU on TGF-
/SMAD-dependent COL1A2 gene transactivation,
described in Fig. 2, and on the
formation of SMAD/DNA complexes.
|
5-FU Stimulates the cJun/AP-1 Signaling Pathway. We previously
reported the ability of c-Jun to block TGF-
-induced COL1A2
promoter transactivation and its critical role in mediating the antagonistic
effects of TNF-
on SMAD-dependent gene transactivation induced by
TGF-
(Chung et al., 1996
;
Verrecchia et al., 2000
,
2003
). Furthermore, it has
been shown that 5-FU stimulates JNK activity and subsequent c-Jun
transcriptional activity (Eichhorst et al.,
2000
). We therefore investigated whether activation of the
cJun/AP-1 signaling pathway by 5-FU may account for its antagonistic activity
against TGF-
signaling and resulting collagen gene modulation. First,
the AP-1specific reporter construct pAP1-TA-lux was used in transient
cell transfection experiments to determine the effects of 5-FU on
AP-1dependent transcription. As shown in
Fig. 4A, 5-FU (10 µM)
enhanced pAP-1-TA-lux activity approximately 3.8-fold above control levels.
Second, EMSAs were carried out with a radiolabeled consensus AP-1
oligonucleotide as a probe to determine whether 5-FU has the ability to induce
AP-1/DNA complexes. As shown in Fig.
4B, a strong retarded band was detected (lane 2 versus lane 1)
with nuclear extracts from fibroblasts treated with 5-FU for 1 h, which was
supershifted with an anti-c-Jun antibody (lane 4). Together, these results
demonstrate that 5-FU stimulates the cJun/AP-1 signaling pathway. To determine
whether c-Jun is directly responsible for the antagonistic activities exerted
by 5-FU against TGF-
/SMAD signaling, we examined the effect of 5-FU in
the presence of an antisense c-jun expression vector shown previously
to efficiently antagonize TNF-
induced c-jun expression
(Mauviel et al., 1996
). As
shown in Fig. 4C, overexpression of antisense c-jun prevented the inhibitory effect of
5-FU on TGF-
driven COL1A2 transactivation in human
fibroblasts. These experiments provide evidence that c-Jun plays a critical
role in mediating the inhibitory effect of 5-FU on TGF-
/SMAD signaling
and subsequent up-regulation of COL1A2 gene expression by
TGF-
.
|
A Role for JNK in 5-FUDriven Inhibition of SMAD-Dependent COL1A2
Gene Transcription Downstream of TGF-
. We recently demonstrated that
JNK-mediated phosphorylation of c-Jun is critical for c-Jun to antagonize
TGF-
/SMAD signaling and subsequent collagen gene transcription
(Verrecchia et al., 2002
,
2003
). We therefore examined
the capacity of 5-FU to induce c-Jun phosphorylation using a reporter assay
based on the mammalian one-hybrid system (see Materials and Methods).
As shown in Fig. 5A, 5-FU
efficiently transactivated the Gal4-lux construct in the presence of
Gal4BD-c-Jun, suggesting that 5-FU activates JNK and subsequent c-Jun
phosphorylation. The ability of 5FU to activate c-Jun phosphorylation was
further confirmed by Western blot analysis of phospho-c-Jun content in
response to 5-FU. As shown in Fig.
5B, 5-FU stimulates c-Jun phosphorylation (lanes 2 versus lanes 1)
to levels comparable with those achieved by TNF-
(lane 3).
|
Second, transient transfection experiments using human dermal fibroblasts
showed that expression of a dominant-negative mutant form of MKK4, blocking
JNK activation, prevented in part the antagonistic effect of 5-FU against
TGF-
driven COL1A2 transactivation
(Fig. 6A).
|
Third, we examined the effect of 5-FU on TGF-
driven
COL1A2 transactivation in fibroblasts devoid of JNK activity, namely
double JNK1-JNK2 knock-out fibroblasts
(JNK/ fibroblasts). As
shown in Fig. 6B, 5-FU
inhibitory activity against TGF-
induced COL1A2 promoter activity
was readily observed in wild-type fibroblasts but was completely absent in
JNK/ fibroblasts providing
definitive evidence for a crucial role of JNK in mediating 5-FU inhibitory
effect against TGF-
induced type I collagen gene expression.
Next, EMSA experiments were carried out using nuclear extracts from wt and
JNK/ fibroblasts treated with
TGF-
(30 min), preteated or not with 5-FU for 60 min. As shown in
Fig. 7, SMAD/DNA complex
formation was equally induced by TGF-
in both wt and
JNK/ fibroblasts (lanes 2 and
6). 5-FU efficiently reduced TGF-
induced SMAD/DNA complexes in wt
(lane 4 versus lane 2); however, no effect of 5-FU on SMAD/DNA complex
formation could be observed in
JNK/ fibroblasts. Thus, it
seems that a good correlation exists between the role of JNK on the inhibitory
effect of 5-FU on SMAD-dependent COL1A2 gene transactivation,
described in Fig. 6, and on the
formation of SMAD/DNA complexes.
|
Dose-Response Relationship of Effects of 5-FU. To ascertain the
relationship between JNK activation and repression of TGF-
induced
COL1A2 gene expression by 5-FU, we next performed a 5-FU
dose-response experiment, in which collagen expression, JNK activation, and
c-Jun phosphorylation were measured in parallel. As shown in
Fig. 8, 5-FU at a concentration
of 0.5 µM neither antagonized TGF-
induced COL1A2 gene
expression (A, lane 3) nor activated JNK (as measured using a
Gal4-c-Junbased mammalian one-hybrid system) (B, lane 2) or c-Jun
phosphorylation (C, lane 2). At 2.5 µM, 5-FU had little effect on
COL1A2 expression, JNK activity. and c-Jun phosphorylation
(Fig. 8, A, lane 4, and B and C, lanes
3.). Maximal JNK activity and c-Jun phosphorylation levels were
observed at 5-FU concentrations of 5 and 10 µM, resulting in significant
down-regulation of TGF-
induced COL1A2 gene expression
(lanes 4 and 5).
|
Together, these results demonstrate a direct correlation between the
capacity of 5-FU to activate JNK at concentrations above 2.5 µM and the
antagonistic activity of 5-FU against TGF-
induced COL1A2
expression.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induced type I
collagen synthesis was inhibited. We specifically demonstrated that 5-FU
inhibits TGF-
-SMAD-driven COL1A2 transactivation, providing a
molecular basis toward the understanding of the molecular mechanisms
underlying the antagonistic activities of 5-FU with TGF-
/SMAD.
SMAD signaling may be blocked by distinct mechanisms: 1) the inhibitory
SMADs (SMAD6 or SMAD7) prevent R-SMAD phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear
translocation of R-SMAD/SMAD4 heterocomplexes and 2) corepressors such as the
viral oncoprotein E1A (Nishihara et al.,
1999
), the proto-oncogenes c-Ski and SnoN
(Akiyoshi et al., 1999
), TGIF
(Wotton et al., 1999
), Snip-1
(Kim et al., 2000
), and SIP1
(Verschueren et al., 1999
),
which compete for R-SMAD/SMAD4 binding to CBP or p300. On the other hand,
induction of Jun proteins by cytokines have been shown to directly interfere
with the SMAD pathway either by preventing SMAD3 binding to cognate DNA
sequences or by sequestering the transcriptional coactivator p300
(Dennler et al., 2000
;
Verrecchia et al., 2000
,
2001b
,c
).
In accordance with a recent work showing that an
AP-1cis-element in the CD65L promoter are required for CD95L
up-regulation by 5-FU (Eichhorst et al.,
2000
), we provide evidence that 5-FU stimulates c-Jun
phosphorylation in dermal fibroblasts. In agreement with the original
observation that c-Jun overexpression blocks TGF-
induced
COL1A2 transactivation (Chung et
al., 1996
), we established that JNK/c-Jun play a central role in
allowing the antagonistic activity of 5-FU against TGF-
induced
type I collagen gene expression. The data establish a link between previous
reports about the interference of c-Jun and JNK with SMAD signaling
(Dennler et al., 2000
) and the
inhibition of TGF-
induced type I collagen gene expression by
TNF-
(Verrecchia et al.,
2000
,
2002
). Specifically, one of
the proposed mechanisms by which Jun proteins interfere with the SMAD pathway
involves direct SMAD-Jun interaction, not compatible with SMAD/DNA complex
formation (Verrecchia et al.,
2001b
,c
).
Also, overexpression of constituvely active forms of either MEKK1 or MKK4,
kinases involved in JNK activation, enhance SMAD-Jun associations and repress
SMAD-dependent transcription (Dennler et
al., 2000
).
Several different mechanisms could explain the excessive deposition of
collagen in the fibrotic skin diseases. First, local expansion of
synthetically active fibroblast populations, even with a normal rate of
collagen production per cell, could lead to tissue accumulation of collagen.
Second, the accumulation of collagen could result from accelerated production
of collagen by fibroblasts, and such increase could reflect enhanced collagen
gene expression at the transcriptional level
(Uitto and Kouba, 2000
). In
this work, we established that 5-FU effects on type I collagen expression and
subsequent collagen deposition could result from inhibition of
TGF-
driven type I collagen transcription.
The basis of keloid formation is not fully understood. Some authors
reported that keloid-derived fibroblasts produce increased amounts of collagen
per cell compared with normal fibroblasts in culture
(English and Shenefelt, 1999
).
They seem to function autonomously and demonstrate continued collagen
synthesis in vitro. These fibroblasts and the collagen produced by them have
been the target of antikeloid therapies
(Low and Moy, 1992
). Our work
provides a molecular explanation for the observed clinical benefits of 5FU in
the treatment of keloids.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: TGF-
, transforming growth factor-
;
R-SMAD, receptor-associated SMAD; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal
kinase; wt, wild type; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; TNF-
,
tumor necrosis factor-
; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Franck Verrecchia, INSERM U532, Institut de Recherche sur la Peau, Pavillon Bazin, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris cedex 10, France. E-mail: verrecchia{at}chustlouis.fr
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
signaling through interaction with SMADs.
J Biol Chem 274:
3526935277.
Broekelmann TJ, Limper AH, Colby TV, and McDonald JA
(1991) Transforming growth factor beta 1 is present at sites of
extracellular matrix gene expression in human pulmonary fibrosis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:
66426646.
Boast S, Su MW, Ramirez F, Sanchez M, and Avvedimento EV
(1990) Functional analysis of cis-acting DNA sequences
controlling transcription of the human type I collagen genes. J
Biol Chem 265:
1335113356.
Chen SJ, Yuan W, Mori Y, Levenson A, Trojanowska M and Varga J (1999) Stimulation of type I collagen transcription in human skin fibroblasts by TGF-beta: involvement of SMAD3. J Investig Dermatol 112: 4957.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chung KY, Agarwal A, Uitto J, and Mauviel A (1996) An
AP-1 binding sequence is essential for regulation of the human
2I collagen (COL1A2) promoter activity by transforming
growth factor-
. J Biol Chem
271:
32723278.
Dennler S, Itoh S, Vivien D, ten Dijke P, Huet S and Gauthier JM (1998) Direct binding of SMAD3 and SMAD4 to critical TGF beta-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 17: 30913100.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dennler S, Prunier C, Ferrand N, Gauthier JM, and Atfi A
(2000) c-Jun inhibits transforming growth factor
-mediated
transcription by repressing SMAD3 transcriptional activity. J Biol
Chem 275:
2885828865.
Ehrlich HP, Desmouliere A, Diegelmann RF, Cohen IK, Compton CC, Garner WL, Kapanci Y, and Gabbiani G (1994) Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar. Am J Pathol 145: 105113.[Abstract]
Eichhorst ST, Muller M, Li-Weber M, Schulze-Bergkamen H, Angel P,
and Krammer PH (2000) A novel AP-1 element in the CD95 ligand
promoter is required for induction of apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma
cells upon treatment with anticancer drugs. Mol Cell
Biol 20:
78267837.
English RS and Shenefelt PD (1999) Keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Surg 25: 631638.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fitzpatrick RE (1999) Treatment of inflamed hypertrophic scars using intralesional 5-FU. Dermatol Surg 25: 224232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gressel MG, Parrish RK, and Folberg R (1984) 5-fluorouracil and glaucoma filtering surgery: I. An animal model. Ophthalmology 91: 378383.[Medline]
Hendricks T, Martens MF, Huyben CM, and Wobbes T (1993) Inhibition of basal and TGF beta-induced fibroblast collagen synthesis by antineoplastic agents. Implications for wound healing. Br J Cancer 67: 545550.[Medline]
Jimenez SA and Saitta B (1999) Alterations in the regulation of expression of the alpha 1(I) collagen gene (COL1A1) in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Springer Semin Immunopathol 21: 397414.[Medline]
Kim RH, Wang D, Tsang M, Martin J, Huff C, de Caestecker MP, Parks
WT, Meng X, Lechleider RJ, Wang T, et al. (2000) A novel SMAD
nuclear interacting protein, SNIP1, suppresses p300-dependent TGF-beta signal
transduction. Genes Dev
14:
16051616.
Low SQ and Moy RL (1992) Scar wars strategies. Target collagen. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18: 981986.[Medline]
Nakatsukasa H, Nagy P, Evarts RP, Hsia CC, Marsden E, and Thorgeirsson SS (1990) Cellular distribution of transforming growth factor-beta 1 and procollagen types I, III and IV transcripts in carbon tetrachloride-induced rat liver fibrosis. J Clin Investig 85: 18331843.
Nishihara A, Hanai J, Imamura T, Miyazono K, and Kawabata M
(1999) E1A inhibits transforming growth factor-
signaling
through binding to SMAD proteins. J Biol Chem.
274:
2871628723.
Mauviel A, Chung KY, Agarwal A, Tamai K, and Uitto J
(1996) Cell-specific induction of distinct oncogenes of the Jun
family is responsible for differential regulation of collagenase gene
expression by transforming growth factor-
in fibroblasts and
keratinocytes. J Biol Chem
271:
1091710923.
Massagué J and Chen YG (2000) Controlling
TGF-beta signaling. Genes Dev
14:
627644.
Massagué J and Wotton D (2000) Transcriptional control by the TGF-beta/SMAD signaling system. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 19: 17451754.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peltonen J, Kähäri L, Jaakkola S, Kähäri VM, Varga J, Uitto J, and Jimenez SA (1990) Evaluation of transforming growth factor beta and type I procollagen gene expression in fibrotic skin diseases by in situ hybridization. J Investig Dermatol 94: 365371.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sabapathy K, Jochum W, Hochedlinger K, Chang L, Karin M, and Wagner EF (1999) Defective neural tube morphogenesis and altered apoptosis in the absence of both JNK1 and JNK2. Mech Dev 89: 115124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Skuta GL, Assil K, Parrish RK, Folberg R, and Weinreb RN (1987) Filtering surgery in owl monkeys treated with the antimetabolite 5-fluorouridine 5'-monophosphate entrapped in multivesicular liposomes. Am J Ophthalmol 103: 714716.[Medline]
Uitto J and Kouba D (2000) Cytokine modulation of extracellular matrix gene expression: relevance to fibrotic skin diseases. J Dermatol Sci 24: S60S69.
Uppal RS, Khan U, Kakar S, Talas G, Chapman P, and McGrouther AD (2001) The effects of a single dose of 5-fluorouracil on keloid scars: a clinical trial of timed wound irrigation after extralesional excision. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 12181224.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verrecchia F, Chu ML, and Mauviel A (2001a)
Identification of novel TGF-
/SMAD gene targets in dermal fibroblasts
using a combined cDNA microarray/promoter transactivation approach.
J Biol Chem 276:
1705817062.
Verrecchia F and Mauviel A (2002) Transforming growth factor-beta signaling through the Smad pathway: role in extracellular matrix gene expression and regulation. J Investig Dermatol 118: 211215.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verrecchia F, Pessah M, Atfi A, and Mauviel A (2000)
Tumor necrosis factor-
inhibits transforming growth factor-
/SMAD
signaling in human dermal fibroblasts via AP-1 activation. J Biol
Chem 275:
3022630231.
Verrecchia F, Tacheau C, Schorpp-Kistner M, Angel P, and Mauviel A (2001b) Induction of the AP-1 members c-Jun and JunB by TGF-beta/SMAD suppresses early SMAD-driven gene activation. Oncogene 20: 22052211.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verrecchia F, Tacheau C, Wagner EF and Mauviel A
(2003) A central role for the Jun-N-terminal kinase pathway in
mediating the antagonistic activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines against
transforming growth factor-
-driven SMAD3/4 specific gene expression.
J Biol Chem 278:
15851593.
Verrecchia F, Vindevoghel L, Lechleider RJ, Uitto J, Roberts AB, and Mauviel A (2001c) SMAD3/AP-1 interactions control transcriptional responses to TGF-beta in a promoter-specific manner. Oncogene 20: 33323340.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verrecchia F, Wagner EF, and Mauviel A (2002) Distinct involvement of the Jun-N-terminal kinase and NFkB pathways in the repression of the human COL1A2 gene by TNF-alpha. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) Rep 3: 10691074.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verschueren K, Remacle JE, Collart C, Kraft H, Baker BS,
Tylzanowski P, Nelles L, Wuytens G, Su MT, Bodmer R, et al.
(1999) SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts
with SMAD proteins and binds to 5'-CACCT sequences in candidate target
genes. J Biol Chem 274:
2048920498.
Vindevoghel L, Kon A, Lechleider RJ, Uitto J, Roberts AB, and
Mauviel A (1998a) Smad-dependent transcriptional activation of
human type VII collagen gene (COL7A1) promoter by transforming growth
factor-
. J Biol Chem
273:
1305313057.
Vindevoghel L, Lechleider RJ, Kon A, de Caestecker MP, Uitto J,
Roberts AB, and Mauviel A (1998b). SMAD3/4-dependent
transcriptional activation of the human type VII collagen gene (COL7A1)
promoter by transforming growth factor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 95:
1476914774.
Wotton D, Lo RS, Lee S, and Massague J (1999) A SMAD transcriptional corepressor. Cell 97: 2939.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang W, Ou J, Inagaki Y, Greenwel P, and Ramirez F
(2000) Synergistic cooperation between Sp1 and SMAD3/SMAD4
mediates transforming growth factor beta1 stimulation of
2I-collagen (COL1A2) transcription. J Biol
Chem 275:
3923739245.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-Q. Wang, Y.-K. Liu, Z.-Y. Wang, Wei Jun, Y.-z. Jiang, Qing Chun, and S.-L. Lu Antimitotic Drug Injections and Radiotherapy: A Review of the Effectiveness of Treatment for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, September 1, 2008; 7(3): 151 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Wang, A. Omar, T. Angelovska, V. Drobic, S. G. Rattan, S. C. Jones, and I. M. C. Dixon Regulation of collagen synthesis by inhibitory Smad7 in cardiac myofibroblasts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1282 - H1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Poulalhon, D. Farge, N. Roos, C. Tacheau, C. Neuzillet, L. Michel, A. Mauviel, and F. Verrecchia Modulation of Collagen and MMP-1 Gene Expression in Fibroblasts by the Immunosuppressive Drug Rapamycin: A DIRECT ROLE AS AN ANTIFIBROTIC AGENT? J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33045 - 33052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-K. Oh, H.-S. Son, Y.-W. Kwon, H.-S. Jang, and K.-S. Kwon Intralesional Fluorouracil Injection in Infantile Digital Fibromatosis Arch Dermatol, May 1, 2005; 141(5): 549 - 550. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wang and R. Hirschberg Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7 Signals Opposing Transforming Growth Factor {beta} in Mesangial Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23200 - 23206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||