![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
B in Tumor Necrosis Factor-Regulated Transcription of the Human µ-Opioid Receptor Gene
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
Received May 28, 2003; accepted July 16, 2003
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Materials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
B was identified as the factor responsible for induction of the gene in immune cells, whereas activator protein-1 was found to be uninvolved. Nuclear factor-B also mediates up-regulation of µ-opioid receptors in neuronal cells stimulated with tumor necrosis factor. Among six putative nuclear factor-B binding sites on the µ-opioid receptor gene promoter, three cis-active elements at nt -2174, -557, and -207 were identified using transfection experiments of reporter gene constructs, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and in vivo binding studies with decoy oligonucleotides. An allelic variation within the -557 element significantly reduced its trans-activating potency, which may affect regulation of the µ-opioid receptor gene in persons carrying this mutation. This study suggests a regulatory function of tumor necrosis factor in opioid-mediated processes in neuronal and immune cells, with possible impact on the complex of inflammation-induced analgesia.
, and (Kieffer, 1995
). In connection with the immune system, endogenous opioids, such as 
-endorphin, and exogenous opioids, such as morphine, are potent immunomodulators with inhibitory, and stimulatory effects on immune function. These include lymphoid organ atrophy, changes in CD4+ and CD8+ expression in thymocytes, reduced natural killer cell activity (Weber and Pert, 1989; Gaveriaux-Ruff et al., 1998), the balance between T helper type 1 and type 2 cells (Roy et al., 1999; Sacerdote et al., 2000), lipopolysaccharide-induced production of IL-6 and TNF, activity of the transcription factor NFB in macrophages and peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures (Chao et al., 1993; Roy et al., 1998a), and chemotactic responsiveness in thymocytes (McCarthy et al., 2001). These findings indicate the presence of µ-opioid receptors on various immune cells, because morphine binds preferentially this receptor subtype. The hypothesis that µ-opioid receptors are expressed on immune cells is further supported by recent observations demonstrating that endomorphins, which are extremely selective for this receptor subtype, have diverse immunomodulatory properties as well (Azuma and Ohura, 2002). However, transcription of µ-opioid receptors in immune effector cells does not proceed constitutively; rather, it is regulated by cytokines such as IL-1 (Vidal et al., 1998) and IL-4 (Kraus et al., 2001).
The cytokine TNF regulates a plethora of vital functions in the whole body, under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions (e.g., inflammation). Evidence for alterations within the opioid system in inflammation, which include changes in the levels of endogenous opioid peptides, as well as their receptors, is presented in numerous reports (Stein et al., 1990; Czlonkowski et al., 1993; Ji et al., 1995; Pol et al., 2001; Buzas et al., 2002; Cahill et al., 2003). An earlier study demonstrated that TNF up-regulates µ-opioid receptors in neuronal cells via the transcription factor NFB; however, a detailed promoter analysis identifying binding sites for this factor remains to be done (Börner et al., 2002).
Here, we addressed the question of whether TNF induces transcription of µ-opioid receptors in immune effector cells, and we investigated molecular mechanisms of this regulation. The most prominent transcription factors modulating target genes in response to TNF are NFB and AP-1 (Baud and Karin, 2001). Using an approach in which function of selected transcription factors can be specifically disrupted in vivo by decoy oligonucleotides, we directly identified NFBas the responsible transcription factor for TNF induction of µ-opioid receptor transcription in immune cells. Finally, NFB binding sites were localized on the human µ-opioid receptor gene promoter to link the action of this transcription factor to transcriptional regulation of the gene in neuronal and immune cells.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
). All cytokines and the anti-human TNFR1 and TNFR2 antibodies (mab225 and mab226) were purchased from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany). Cycloheximide (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) was used at a concentration of 10 µg/ml. Sulfasalazine (Sigma) was dissolved in cell culture medium and added at a concentration of 1 mM 30 min before TNF.
Conventional RT-PCR from Human Immune Effector Cells. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy columns (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and checked for accidental degradation on an agarose gel. Two micrograms were used for cDNA synthesis with Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, RNase H- (Promega, Mannheim, Germany), and diluted to 100 µl. GAPDH control RT-PCR, and amplification of µ-opioid receptor-specific transcripts has been described in detail previously (Kraus et al., 2001).
Quantitative Real-Time PCR. Real-time RT-PCR with Raji and U937 cDNAs was performed according to the supplier's manual in a total volume of 20 µl on a LightCycler instrument using the LightCycler fast-start DNA master SYBR green I kit (both from Roche, Mannheim, Germany). To calculate the amounts of µ-opioid receptor transcripts relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH, a 163-bp fragment of this gene was amplified (forward primer 5'-CAACTACATGGTTTACATGTTC-3', reverse primer 5'-GCCAGTGGACTCCACGAC-3', located on different exons) under the following conditions: 1) preincubation for 7 min at 95°C; 2) 50 cycles for 5 s at 95°C, 5 s at 64°C, and 10 s at 72°C. µ-Opioid receptor transcripts were amplified as follows: 1) preincubation for 8 min at 95°C. 2) 50 cycles for 5 s at 95°C, 10 s at 65°C, and 18 s at 72°C. The sequences of µ-opioid receptor primers were 5'-GATCATGGCCCTCTACTCCA-3' (located at position 216 in exon 1) and 5'-GCATTTCGGGGAGTACGGAA-3' (located at position 557 in exon 2, to avoid amplification of genomic DNA).
Reporter Gene Plasmids. Construction of the human µ-opioid receptor promoter reporter constructs -2624, -2229, -1372, -779, -2478/-2287, and -1854/-1224 has been described earlier (Kraus et al., 2001; Börner et al., 2002). The 5'-end deletion constructs -1854, -254, and -174 were made by cutting the -2624 plasmid with HindIII and AccI, PstI, and BlpI, respectively, and religation of the blunted ends. For the -2229/-1854 construct, a SauI-AccI fragment of the human µ-opioid receptor upstream region was inserted in front of the Herpes simplex virus tk promoter of pBLCAT2 (Luckow and Schutz, 1987). Plasmids -1372/-910, -910/-714, -714/-590, and -590/-363 were generated by digestion of the µ-opioid receptor promoter with Sau3A and shotgun cloning of the fragments into pBLCAT2's BamHI site. Insertion of oligonucleotides into pBLCAT2 was performed according to a described method (Kang and Inouye, 1993). All plasmids were sequenced from both sides to ensure correct orientations and sequences of the inserts.
Transfection Experiments. Plasmid DNA was isolated using QIAGEN plasmid kits. Before transfection, cells received fresh medium with 1% fetal calf serum. Raji and U937 cells were transfected as follows: 5 x 106 cells were pelleted, resuspended in 5 ml of medium, and transfected by drop-wise addition of 10 µg of plasmid DNA in 500 µl of a buffer containing 125 mM CaCl2, 140 mM NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, and 0.5 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.05. After a 17-h incubation at 3% CO2 and 35°C, cells were pelleted again and given fresh medium. SH SY5Y monolayer cells were transfected by the same procedure, but without centrifugation steps. Transient expression of CAT reporter gene products was allowed for a further 48 h with or without 100 U/ml TNF. The CAT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Roche) was performed according to the supplier's manual.
Decoy Oligonucleotide Approach in Immune Cells. Generally, in the decoy approach, double-stranded oligonucleotides with specific binding sequences for transcription factors are brought into living cells to selectively disrupt the function of these factors. In the cells, transcription factors then interact with an excess of decoy oligonucleotides instead of binding to the natural regulatory motifs of genes (Bielinska et al., 1990; Kraus et al., 2003). Decoy oligonucleotides (100 nM) were directly cotransfected either with reporter gene plasmid DNA (for the experiments shown in Figs. 4 and 7) or carrier DNA (the promoterless cloning vector pBLCAT3, for the experiments shown in Fig. 3). The oligonucleotides had no chemical modifications. To avoid any effect on transfection efficiency caused by different amounts of transfected DNA, the total amounts of both plasmid DNA and oligonucleotides were kept constant in the individual experiments by addition of oligonucleotides containing an AP-2 binding site, if necessary. To exclude unspecific effects of decoy oligonucleotides that might be a result solely of their presence, the following controls were performed: 100 nM oligonucleotides containing motifs for transcription factors AP-1, AP-2, or STAT6 did not change inducibility of a NFB-responsive reporter construct; single-stranded NFB oligonucleotides were not active as decoys (100 nM sense or antisense strand, or a mixture of 100 nM each of nonannealed sense and antisense strand). Oligonucleotides used are shown in Table 1.
|
|
|
|
Extraction of Nuclear Proteins and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay. Both procedures have been described recently (Börner et al., 2002). For immunoshift experiments, the p65 NFB antibody C-20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) was used.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
TNFR2 Mediates Induction of µ-Opioid Receptor Transcription in Raji Cells. Neutralizing antibodies against TNFR1 (p55, TNFRSF1A) and TNFR2 (p75, TNFRSF1B) were used to determine the TNFR by which the effect on µ-opioid receptor gene transcription is mediated (Fig. 2). These antibodies lack agonistic properties, which has been observed for some TNFR antibodies, and are suitable to neutralize effects of TNF (Matthews and Neale, 1987). Addition of TNFR1 antibodies before stimulation of Raji cells with TNF had no inhibitory effect. In contrast, µ-opioid receptor transcription was blocked in a concentration-dependent manner by TNFR2 antibodies, suggesting that the TNF effect is mediated solely via the TNFR2.
|
Induction of µ-Opioid Receptor Transcription in Immune Cells Depends on NFB, but Not on AP-1. Next, we addressed the question of whether the transcription factor AP-1 or NFB, or possibly both, mediates TNF-induction of µ-opioid receptor transcription. We used an approach that combined selective disruption of transcription factor function using AP-1 and NFB decoy oligonucleotides and quantitative real-time PCR to monitor µ-opioid receptor-specific transcripts (Fig. 3). Consistent with the results shown in Fig. 1, no µ-opioid receptor transcripts were observed in unstimulated Raji and U937 cells (data not shown). TNF-induced µ-opioid receptor transcription in these cells is displayed in curves 1 and 5 (Fig. 3). This TNF-induced transcription was negligibly affected by decoy oligonucleotides containing an AP-1 binding site (curves 2 and 6), suggesting that AP-1 is not involved in mediating the TNF effect. In contrast, loss of NFB function by transfection of NFB decoy oligonucleotides completely inhibited transcriptional induction of the µ-opioid receptor gene in TNF-stimulated immune cells (Fig. 3, curves 3, 4, 7, and 8), which directly demonstrates that the TNF effect is dependent on NFB. Controls demonstrating the efficacy and specificity of the decoy oligonucleotides are displayed in Fig. 4. Therefore, a reporter gene construct containing a classic NFB binding motif was cotransfected in Raji cells together with various decoy oligonucleotides (Fig. 4A). Then, the decoy oligonucleotide-provoked inhibition of the TNF-/NFB-mediated reporter gene activity was measured. Homologous NFB decoys resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of reporter gene activity (IC50, 47 nM). The specificity of NFB decoy oligonucleotides is shown in Fig. 7 with NFB-like motifs with mutations within the binding sequence. AP-1, AP-2, and STAT6 decoys did not inhibit reporter gene activation. Figure 4B shows similar controls for an AP-1-responsive reporter gene construct with wild type (IC50, 45 nM) and mutant AP-1 and NFB decoy oligonucleotides. The finding that the TNF-induced transcription of the µ-opioid receptor gene is entirely blocked by NFB decoy oligonucleotides implies that almost all cells were transfected with the decoys, which is unlikely, because the transfection rate of these cells in our experiments was lower than 50%. However, we observed that the decoy oligonucleotides were entering the cells also without transfection, by simple addition into the medium. Thus, addition of NFB decoys to culture medium immediately before TNF stimulation resulted in a decrease in TNF-induced µ-opioid receptor mRNA in Raji cells in a dose-dependent manner, as revealed by quantitative real time PCR, 24 h after stimulation: TNF-stimulated control cells, 100 ± 9% µ-opioid receptor transcripts; TNF-stimulated cells grown in medium containing 25 nM decoy oligonucleotides, 145 ± 39%; 50 nM decoys, 111 ± 15%; 75 nM decoys, 75 ± 14%; 100 nM decoys, 9 ± 3%**. Thus, both passive uptake of the decoy oligonucleotides and transfection of them contributes to the highly efficient inhibition of TNF-induced µ-opioid receptor transcription in our experiments.
The Human µ-Opioid Receptor Gene Promoter Contains Three NFB Binding Sites. Transient transfection experiments with reporter gene constructs containing sequences of the µ-opioid receptor promoter were performed to identify NFB elements. SH SY5Y cells were used for these experiments, because stimulation of these cells with TNF results only in activation of NFB, not, for example, AP-1, for which the promoter is responsive as well (Börner et al., 2002). As suggested by sequence homology, the µ-opioid receptor promoter contains six motifs to which NFB may bind. These putative elements, termed M1 through M6, are shown in Fig. 5A and their sequences are shown in Fig. 7A. Transfection of the longest promoter construct, -2624, revealed significant inducibility with TNF (Fig. 5A, lane 1). Consecutive 5'-end deletion of the promoter up to -254 did not abolish inducibility (lanes 2 to 6). However, the -174 construct showed no responsiveness to TNF (Fig. 5A, lane 7), indicating that M6 at position -207 may be an NFB site. To identify additional NFB elements and to determine whether these elements would be functional in front of a heterologous promoter, the µ-opioid receptor upstream sequences were dissected and tested in front of the Herpes simplex virus tk promoter. These experiments showed that sequences containing M2 (at nt -2174) and M5 (at nt -557) also conferred a response to TNF, whereas other sequences and the other motifs did not (Fig. 5A, lanes 8 to 14). The reporter gene vector pBLCAT2 was not responsive to TNF (Fig. 5A, lane 15). When oligonucleotides containing M2, M5, and M6 sequences were cloned in front of the tk promoter, they were sufficient to mediate the TNF response independent of their orientation (Fig. 5B). Treatment of transfected cells with the specific NFB inhibitor sulfasalazine (Wahl et al., 1998) before TNF stimulation abolished the effect of the cytokine (data not shown), which further supports the conclusion that these elements bind NFB. In a previous study, polymorphisms of the human µ-opioid receptor gene had been localized (Hoehe et al., 2000). Interestingly, one of these naturally occurring allelic variation alters the sequence of the -557 M5 motif from 5'-GGGGTTTTAG-3' to 5'-GGGATTTTAG-3'. To test whether this variation may have any impact on its trans- activating potency, a construct containing the mutated allele was also tested. The mutated motif also conferred a significant response to TNF but with a significantly reduced potency compared with the wild-type sequence (Fig. 5B).
|
The µ-Opioid Receptor Promoter Elements Bind NFB in Vitro. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed to investigate binding of NFB to the putative sites within the µ-opioid receptor gene promoter (Fig. 6). First, oligonucleotides containing M1 through M6 were tested to determine whether they were able to compete for NFB binding to a classic NFB element. In addition to homologous NFB oligonucleotides, M2, M5 (wild type), and M6 were efficient competitors (Fig. 6A), indicating that they are indeed NFB sites. This is in good accordance with the transfection experiments described above. To compare the wild-type M5 and the polymorphic M5 motif, the same experiments were performed using multiple amounts of competitor DNA (Fig. 6B). Clearly, the ability to compete for NFB binding was more pronounced for the wild-type motif, with a complete competition using 3.3 pmol of oligonucleotides. In contrast, using the mutated M5 motif, 10 pmol of oligonucleotides was needed for a complete competition.
|
Then, M2, M5 wild type, M5 variant, and M6 oligonucleotides were used as probes and tested for NFB binding (Fig. 6C). The band-shift patterns were identical for the three µ-opioid receptor motifs as well as for the classic NFB motif, yielding a typical double band. The µ-opioid receptor elements were confirmed as NFB binding sites by competition experiments with classic NFB oligonucleotides as well as by supershift experiments with a specific NFB antibody (Fig. 6D).
The µ-Opioid Receptor Promoter Elements Bind NFB in Intact Raji Cells. The decoy oligonucleotide approach was used to demonstrate binding of the µ-opioid receptor elements to NFB in intact cells. For these experiments, a reporter gene construct containing a classic NFB binding motif was cotransfected in Raji cells together with decoy oligonucleotides containing the µ-opioid receptor NFB sequences (Fig. 7A). In full accordance with the transfection and gel-shift experiments, the M2, M5 (wt), and M6 sequences were targets for NFB in the immune cells and inhibited TNF-induced stimulation of the reporter gene construct by capturing NFB in vivo. The effect of the polymorphism within element M5 could also be demonstrated with the decoy approach in Raji cells (Fig. 7B). Thus, wild-type M5 decoy oligonucleotides were significantly more effective competitors than mutated M5 decoys, with 44 and 55 nM concentrations of oligonucleotides, respectively, needed for a 50% inhibition of TNF-induced reporter gene activation.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
; Roy et al., 2001)], directly via atypical opioid receptors [which were postulated because some opioid effects cannot be blocked by the classic opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (Roy et al., 1998b)], or directly via the classic opioid receptor subtypes µ, , and present on immune cells. It has been shown previously that classic µ-opioid receptors are induced by IL-4 in various immune cells (Kraus et al., 2001) and by IL-1 in endothelial cells (Vidal et al., 1998). Here, we demonstrated that TNF also induces µ-opioid receptor transcription in immune cells. Considerable evidence indicates that transcription of µ-opioid receptors is correlated with expression of functional receptors on immune cells, demonstrated by the capacity of µ-opioid receptor ligands to affect immune cell functions described in numerous reports (Weber and Pert, 1989; Chao et al., 1993; Roy et al., 1998a; Gaveriaux-Ruff et al., 1998; Roy et al., 1999; Sacerdote et al., 2000; McCarthy et al., 2001; Azuma and Ohura, 2002). In addition to cells derived from the immune system, cytokines regulate µ-opioid receptor expression also in neuronal cells. Thus, induction of µ-opioid receptor expression is observed in primary astrocyte-enriched cultures of various brain regions by IL-1 (Ruzicka et al., 1996) and in primary fetal cortical neurons and SH SY5Y cells by IL-4 (Kraus et al., 2001) and TNF (Börner et al., 2002). Studies with IL-6 knockout mice revealed that levels of µ-opioid receptors are decreased in certain brain regions compared with wild-type animals, suggesting also a positive regulation of the gene by IL-6 (Bianchi et al., 1999). From the current point of view, cytokines thus represent potent physiological modulators of µ-opioid receptor transcription.
Transcriptional activation of µ-opioid receptors in response to TNF in Raji cells is dependent on TNFR2 and independent of de novo protein synthesis, although transcripts appear somewhat delayed after 2 to 6 h. To date, the physiological role of TNFR2 is not completely understood. It is clear, however, that TNFR2 can trigger inflammation (Tartaglia et al., 1991; Akassoglou et al., 2003). The involvement of µ-opioid receptors in inflammation is discussed below. By and large, TNF may lead to activation of two major transcription factors, AP-1 and NFB (Baud and Karin, 2001). Both factors could also be involved in TNF regulation of µ-opioid receptor transcription because the gene promoters of various species contain functional AP-1 elements as well (Kraus et al., 1995; Börner et al., 2002). Interestingly, an involvement of AP-1 could be clearly ruled out in the immune cell lines used, whereas loss of NFB function completely inhibited induction of the gene, demonstrating that transcriptional induction of the gene in response to TNF depends solely on NFB. The decoy oligonucleotide strategy to selectively disrupt function of a transcription factor in intact cells, which was used here, allows direct identification of the relevant factor(s) involved in a particular regulatory event. It is thus very useful to close the common gap between measuring an effect of a stimulus on a certain gene's transcription on the one hand and the identification of "possibly involved" transcription factor binding sites on that gene's promoter on the other hand.
Multiple NFB elements on the µ-opioid receptor gene most probably indicate the importance for regulation via this factor. Interestingly, the trans-activating potency of one of the NFB regulatory elements is markedly reduced because of an allelic variation. Currently, two mechanisms are being discussed to explain the well known heterogeneity of patients' responses to opioid analgetics: multiple protein variants of opioid receptors and opioid receptor gene polymorphisms. The µ-opioid receptor gene is expressed in a considerable number of protein variants (Pan et al., 2001) and has plenty of polymorphisms (Hoehe et al., 2000). Notably, 28 allelic variations, more than half of the polymorphisms identified so far on this gene, are located within the promoter region. Promoter polymorphisms may have considerable consequences for regulation of the gene if they affect binding sites for transcription factors. Interestingly, apart from the polymorphism within the NFB site described here, another allelic variation is located within a STAT6 element, which impairs regulation of the gene by cytokines like IL-4 (Kraus et al., 2001). Another polymorphism is located at nt -1699, immediately adjacent to a binding site for a still unknown nuclear protein (Börner et al., 2002).
It should be noted that transcription of the µ-opioid receptor gene in mice is under control of two distinct promoters. In addition to the main promoter flanking exon 1, there is another promoter flanking exon 11, which is located roughly 10 kilobases upstream of exon 1 (Pan et al., 2001). For the human gene, only the promoter upstream of exon 1 is known so far. Nevertheless, even if there is no evidence to date that the human gene is alternatively spliced in a similar way, the existence of an upstream promoter of the human gene cannot be excluded.
Regulation of µ-opioid receptors by TNF may be important within the complex of inflammation-induced analgesia. It is now established that immunocyte-derived endogenous opioids induce analgesia by activating peripheral opioid receptors at later stages during inflammation, which can be regarded as a physiological mechanism to counteract and reduce inflammatory pain (Stein et al., 1990; Cabot et al., 1997). Most probably, the relevant opioid receptors are of the µ subtype, because these are up-regulated in dorsal root ganglia in inflammation, whereas the subtype is down-regulated (Ji et al., 1995). Moreover, it was shown that cytokines such as TNF, IL-1, IL-6, and corticotropin-releasing factor contribute to inflammation-induced analgesia (Czlonkowski et al., 1993; Schafer et al., 1994). In this scenario, TNF could contribute to maximizing the analgesic effect of endogenous opioids by increasing the concentration of their receptors in the neuronal cells. In the immunocytes, TNF-induction of µ-opioid receptors could allow a feedback regulation in which the endogenous opioids could modulate either their own secretion or secretion of other cytokines.
A strategy to relieve pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is to inhibit TNF and/or NFB, which are recognized as key mediators for this disease. Interestingly, use of decoy oligonucleotides to disrupt NFB activity has also been discussed for gene therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (Tomita et al., 2000). We demonstrated that chemically nonmodified decoy oligonucleotides could enter blood cells without being transfected or transduced via viruses, which could be promising toward certain decoy gene therapies. Often, NFB inhibitors, such as sulfasalazine (Wahl et al., 1998), or preparations of antibodies against TNF, such as infliximab (Kalden, 2002), are applied. In the end, the strategy to block TNF/NFB may bear considerable side effects. These could include impaired antinociception as a result of the lack of natural activation of the opioid system via TNF and NFB. Especially in the case of rheumatoid arthritis, it may be not beneficial to impair the opioid system, because a recent study demonstrated that endogenous opioids ameliorate excessive synovial cell functions via µ-opioid receptors (Takeba et al., 2001). The authors speculated that endogenous opioids act in an antinociceptive as well as an antiinflammatory manner.
In conclusion, our study contributes to the understanding of the multiple interactions between the immune system and the nervous system and suggests additional functions of TNF in physiological and pathophysiological regulatory circuits.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
J.K. and C.B. contributed equally to this work.
ABBREVIATIONS: IL, interleukin; NFB, nuclear factor B; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); tk, thymidine kinase; AP, activator protein; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; nt, nucleotide; wt, wild type; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase.
1 Present address: Department of Medical Pharmacology, University of Rome, 5 Piazzale Aldo Moro, 00185 Roma, Italy. 
Address correspondence to: Jürgen Kraus, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Magdeburg, 44 Leipziger Strasse, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail juergen.kraus{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Azuma Y and Ohura K (2002) Endomorphin-2 modulates productions of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-10, and IL-12 and alters functions related to innate immune of macrophages. Inflammation 26: 223-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baud V and Karin M (2001) Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor and its relatives. Trends Cell Biol 11: 372-377.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bianchi M, Maggi R, Pimpinelli F, Rubino T, Parolaro D, Poli V, Ciliberto G, Panerai AE, and Sacerdote P (1999) Presence of a reduced opioid response in interleukin-6 knock out mice. Eur J Neurosci 11: 1501-1507.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bielinska A, Shivdasani RA, Zhang LQ, and Nabel GJ (1990) Regulation of gene expression with double-stranded phosphorothioate oligonucleotides. Science (Wash DC) 250: 997-1000.
Börner C, Höllt V, and Kraus J (2002) Involvement of activator protein-1 in transcriptional regulation of the human µ-opioid receptor gene. Mol Pharmacol 61: 800-805.
Buzas B, Rosenberger J, Kim KW, and Cox BM (2002) Inflammatory mediators increase the expression of nociceptin/orphanin FQ in rat astrocytes in culture. Glia 39: 237-246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cabot PJ, Carter L, Gaiddon C, Zhang Q, Schafer M, Loeffler JP, and Stein C (1997) Immune cell-derived beta-endorphin. Production, release and control of inflammatory pain in rats. J Clin Investig 100: 142-148.[Medline]
Cabot PJ, Carter L, Schafer M, and Stein C (2001) Methionine-enkephalin-and Dynorphin A-release from immune cells and control of inflammatory pain. Pain 93: 207-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cahill CM, Morinville A, Hoffert C, O'Donnell D, and Beaudet A (2003) Up-regulation and trafficking of delta opioid receptor in a model of chronic inflammation: implications for pain control. Pain 101: 199-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chao CC, Molitor TW, Close K, Hu S, and Peterson PK (1993) Morphine inhibits the release of tumor necrosis factor in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. Int J Immunopharmacol 15: 447-453.[Medline]
Czlonkowski A, Stein C, and Herz A (1993) Peripheral mechanisms of opioid antinociception in inflammation: involvement of cytokines. Eur J Pharmacol 242: 229-235.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gaveriaux-Ruff C, Matthes HW, Peluso J, and Kieffer BL (1998) Abolition of morphine-immunosuppression in mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 6326-6330.
Hoehe MR, Kopke K, Wendel B, Rohde K, Flachmeier C, Kidd KK, Berrettini WH, and Church GM (2000) Sequence variability and candidate gene analysis in complex disease: association of mu opioid receptor gene variation with substance dependence. Hum Mol Genet 9: 2895-2908.
Ji RR, Zhang Q, Law PY, Low HH, Elde R, and Hokfelt T (1995) Expression of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor-like immunoreactivities in rat dorsal root ganglia after carrageenan-induced inflammation. J Neurosci 15: 8156-8166.[Abstract]
Kalden JR (2002) Emerging role of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Res 4: S34-S40.
Kang C and Inouye M (1993) One-step insertion of oligonucleotide linkers or adapters to DNA using unphosphorylated oligonucleotides. Biotechniques 15: 659-662, 665-656, 668.
Kieffer BL (1995) Recent advances in molecular recognition and signal transduction of active peptides: receptors for opioid peptides. Cell Mol Neurobiol 15: 615-635.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kraus J, Börner C, Giannini E, Hickfang K, Braun H, Mayer P, Hoehe MR, Ambrosch A, König W, and Höllt V (2001) Regulation of µ-opioid receptor gene transcription by interleukin-4 and influence of an allelic variation within a STAT6 transcription factor binding site. J Biol Chem 276: 43901-43908.
Kraus J, Börner C, and Höllt V (2003) Distinct palindromic extensions of the 5'-TTC... GAA-3' motif allow STAT6 binding in vivo. FASEB J 17: 304-306.
Kraus J, Horn G, Zimprich A, Simon T, Mayer P, and Höllt V (1995) Molecular cloning and functional analysis of the rat mu opioid receptor gene promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 215: 591-597.[CrossRef][Medline]
Luckow B and Schutz G (1987) CAT constructions with multiple unique restriction sites for the functional analysis of eukaryotic promoters and regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 549019.
Matthews N and Neale ML (1987) in Lymphokines and Interferons, A Practical Approach (Clemens MJ, Morris AG and Gearing AJH eds) p 296, IRL Press, Oxford.
McCarthy L, Szabo I, Nitsche JF, Pintar JE, and Rogers TJ (2001) Expression of functional mu-opioid receptors during T cell development. J Neuroimmunol 114: 173-180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pan YX, Xu J, Mahurter L, Bolan E, Xu M, and Pasternak GW (2001) Generation of the mu opioid receptor (MOR-1) protein by three new splice variants of the Oprm gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 14084-14089.
Pol O, Alameda F, and Puig MM (2001) Inflammation enhances µ-opioid receptor transcription and expression in mice intestine. Mol Pharmacol 60: 894-899.
Roy S, Cain KJ, Chapin RB, Charboneau RG, and Barke RA (1998a) Morphine modulates NF kappa B activation in macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 245: 392-396.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roy S, Barke RA, and Loh HH (1998b) MU-opioid receptor-knockout mice: role of mu-opioid receptor in morphine mediated immune functions. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 61: 190-194.[Medline]
Roy S, Charboneau RG, and Barke RA (1999) Morphine synergizes with lipopolysaccharide in a chronic endotoxemia model. J Neuroimmunol 95: 107-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roy S, Wang JH, Balasubramanian S, Sumandeep, Charboneau R, Barke R and Loh HH (2001) Role of hypothalamic-pituitary axis in morphine-induced alteration in thymic cell distribution using mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. J Neuroimmunol 116: 147-155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ruzicka BB, Thompson RC, Watson SJ, and Akil H (1996) Interleukin-1 beta-mediated regulation of mu-opioid receptor mRNA in primary astrocyte-enriched cultures. J Neurochem 66: 425-428.[Medline]
Sacerdote P, Gaspani L, and Panerai AE (2000) The opioid antagonist naloxone induces a shift from type 2 to type 1 cytokine pattern in normal and skin-grafted mice. Ann NY Acad Sci 917: 755-763.
Schafer M, Carter L, and Stein C (1994) Interleukin 1 beta and corticotropin-releasing factor inhibit pain by releasing opioids from immune cells in inflamed tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 4219-4223.
Stein C, Hassan AH, Przewlocki R, Gramsch C, Peter K, and Herz A (1990) Opioids from immunocytes interact with receptors on sensory nerves to inhibit nociception in inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 5935-5939.
Takeba Y, Suzuki N, Kaneko A, Asai T, and Sakane T (2001) Endorphin and enkephalin ameliorate excessive synovial cell functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 28: 2176-2183.[Medline]
Tartaglia LA, Weber RF, Figari IS, Reynolds C, Palladino MA Jr, and Goeddel DV (1991) The two different receptors for tumor necrosis factor mediate distinct cellular responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 9292-9296.
Tomita T, Takano H, Tomita N, Morishita R, Kaneko M, Shi K, Takahi K, Nakase T, Kaneda Y, Yoshikawa H, et al. (2000) Transcription factor decoy for NFkappaB inhibits cytokine and adhesion molecule expressions in synovial cells derived from rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39: 749-757.
Vidal EL, Patel NA, Wu G, Fiala M, and Chang SL (1998) Interleukin-1 induces the expression of mu opioid receptors in endothelial cells. Immunopharmacology 38: 261-266.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wahl C, Liptay S, Adler G, and Schmid RM (1998) Sulfasalazine: a potent and specific inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B. J Clin Investig 101: 1163-1174.[Medline]
Weber RJ and Pert A (1989) The periaqueductal gray matter mediates opiate-induced immunosuppression. Science (Wash DC) 245: 188-190.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Borner, J. Kraus, A. Bedini, B. Schraven, and V. Hollt T-Cell Receptor/CD28-Mediated Activation of Human T Lymphocytes Induces Expression of Functional {micro}-Opioid Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2008; 74(2): 496 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. J. Edenberg, X. Xuei, L. F. Wetherill, L. Bierut, K. Bucholz, D. M. Dick, V. Hesselbrock, S. Kuperman, B. Porjesz, M. A. Schuckit, et al. Association of NFKB1, which encodes a subunit of the transcription factor NF-{kappa}B, with alcohol dependence Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2008; 17(7): 963 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Borner, A. Bedini, V. Hollt, and J. Kraus Analysis of Promoter Regions Regulating Basal and Interleukin-4-Inducible Expression of the Human CB1 Receptor Gene in T Lymphocytes Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 73(3): 1013 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. Williams, J. P. Thompson, J. McDonald, T. A. Barnes, T. Cote, D. J. Rowbotham, and D. G. Lambert Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Express Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ, but Not {micro}, {delta}, or {kappa} Opioid Receptors Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 998 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Chang, J. A. Beltran, and S. Swarup Expression of the Mu Opioid Receptor in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Transgenic Rat Model J. Virol., August 15, 2007; 81(16): 8406 - 8411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. K. Hwang, K. Y. Song, C. S. Kim, H. S. Choi, X.-H. Guo, P.-Y. Law, L.-N. Wei, and H. H. Loh Evidence of Endogenous Mu Opioid Receptor Regulation by Epigenetic Control of the Promoters Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2007; 27(13): 4720 - 4736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Borner, V. Hollt, W. Sebald, and J. Kraus Transcriptional regulation of the cannabinoid receptor type 1 gene in T cells by cannabinoids J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2007; 81(1): 336 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Matsuzaki, M. Canis, J.-L. Pouly, R. Botchorishvili, P.J. Dechelotte, and G. Mage Both GnRH agonist and continuous oral progestin treatments reduce the expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor B and mu-opioid receptor in deep infiltrating endometriosis Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 124 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Borner, V. Hollt, and J. Kraus Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonists Induce Transcription of the {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene in Jurkat T Cells Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1486 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-S. Kim, K. K. Pandey, H. S. Choi, S.-Y. Kim, P.-Y. Law, L.-N. Wei, and H. H. Loh Poly(C) Binding Protein Family Is a Transcription Factor in {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene Expression Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2005; 68(3): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. S. Choi, C. K. Hwang, C. S. Kim, K. Y. Song, P.-Y. Law, L.-N. Wei, and H. H. Loh Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse {micro} Opioid Receptor Gene: Sp3 Isoforms (M1, M2) Function as Repressors in Neuronal Cells to Regulate the {micro} Opioid Receptor Gene Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2005; 67(5): 1674 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-W. Lee, S. Wu, and Y.-M. Lee Differential Expression of {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene in CXBK and B6 Mice by Sp1 Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 66(6): 1580 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Borner, J. Kraus, H. Schroder, H. Ammer, and V. Hollt Transcriptional Regulation of the Human {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene by Interleukin-6 Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 66(6): 1719 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
X174 size marker (band-sizes from top to bottom: 1353 bp, 1078 bp, 872 bp, 603 bp, and 281/217 bp double band). B, time kinetic of µ-opioid receptor transcription initiation in Raji cells and effect of cycloheximide. Raji cells were stimulated with 100 U/ml TNF for different times as indicated. The 24-h incubations were tested with and without cycloheximide (CX). RNA and cDNA were prepared and subjected to real-time RT-PCR. The relative amounts of µ-opioid receptor mRNA at the different time points are plotted after normalization to equal GAPDH mRNA levels. The results are from two independent experiments performed in triplicate.
